Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2020 Nov 3;11:5561. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18844-4

Self-templated synthesis of uniform hollow spheres based on highly conjugated three-dimensional covalent organic frameworks

Yuan-Yuan Liu 1,#, Xiang-Chun Li 1,#, Shi Wang 1, Tao Cheng 1, Huiyan Yang 1, Chen Liu 1, Yanting Gong 1, Wen-Yong Lai 1,2,, Wei Huang 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7642269  PMID: 33144580

Abstract

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have served as a family of porous crystalline molecules for various promising applications. However, controllable synthesis of COFs with uniform morphology is paramount yet still remains quite challenging. Herein, we report self-templated synthesis of uniform and unique hollow spheres based on highly conjugated three-dimensional (3D) COFs with diameters of 500–700 nm. A detailed time-dependent study reveals the continuous transformation from initial nano sphere-like particles into uniform hollow spherical structures with Ostwald ripening mechanism. Particularly, the resulting 3D COF (3D-Sp-COF) is prone to transport ions more efficiently and the lithium-ion transference number (t+) of 3D-Sp-COF reaches 0.7, which even overwhelms most typical PEO-based polymer electrolytes. Inspiringly, the hollow spherical structures show enhanced capacitance performance with a specific capacitance of 251 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1, which compares favorably with the vast majority of two-dimensional COFs and other porous electrode materials.

Subject terms: Metal-organic frameworks, Porous materials


Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are promising porous crystalline materials but controllable synthesis of COFs with uniform morphology remains challenging. Here, the authors report a self-templated synthesis of uniform and unique hollow spheres based on highly conjugated three-dimensional COFs.

Introduction

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs), as an important type of crystalline porous materials with well-defined and predictable structures, demonstrate extensive applications in molecule storage and separation1,2, catalysis3,4, energy storage5,6, optoelectronics7,8, and sensors9,10. Despite their crystalline features, COFs are usually obtained as microcrystalline morphologies and their long-range ordered growth is limited in the nano/micro domain because of the internal defects and kinetic trapping of smaller crystallites1113. The morphology of the crystallites is an important factor for their applications, such as molecular absorption and catalysis14,15, drug delivery16,17, energy storage18,19, etc. In general, the geometry of the building blocks plays a key role to determine the morphology of the crystallites2022. Based on the geometry of the building blocks, COFs are mainly classified as two-dimensional (2D) COFs and three-dimensional (3D) COFs2325. Since the first report on 2D COFs presented by Yaghi and co-workers in 2005 (ref. 26), extensive efforts have been devoted to this fast developing area6,27,28. Controllable synthesis of COF crystallites with uniform morphology, which is beneficial to fine modulating the material performance and better understanding the forming mechanisms of COF crystallites29,30, is highly desirable yet quite challenging11,31,32. Various COFs with uniform morphology such as free-standing films3336, nanosheets3739, tubes12,40, shuttle41, belts22,42, fibers43,44, and spheres45,46 have been recently reported mainly based on 2D COFs with fully exploring the potential of the 2D-layered structures. As compared with 2D COFs, 3D COFs with extended networks are generally able to achieve intrinsically large surface areas47,48, low density of open sites49,50, and fascinating confinement effects5153, which have recently received increasing interest. However, the synthesis of 3D COFs with uniform morphologies remains unexplored. It is quite challenging to obtain 3D COF crystallite structures with uniform morphology mainly due to the “unavoidable” existence of cross-linked networks53. Considering their unique chemical and structural characteristics, it is charming to construct 3D COFs with uniform morphologies via controllable synthesis.

Herein, we report the controllable synthesis of 3D COFs (3D-Sp-COF) with uniform and unique hollow spherical morphology based on highly conjugated building blocks via self-templated synthetic methods. Their formation mechanism of hollow spheres based on 3D COFs has been investigated by a detailed time-dependent study and the growth process has been dominated by Ostwald ripening. Interestingly, all the 3D COFs show large surface area (up to 1016 m2 g−1) and high ion mobility, which serve as attractive candidates as electrode materials for energy storage applications. Among these, the well-defined hollow spherical 3D-Sp-COF@96 h shows enhanced specific capacitance (251 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1) as compared with the 3D COFs with defective intermediate morphology, revealing that the characteristics of 3D COFs can be facilely regulated by exploring the potential of the microstructures. According to our preliminary specific capacitance studies, overwhelming high specific capacitance of 251 F g−1 has been achieved for 3D COFs by facilely modulating the morphological features.

Results

Synthesis and structural characterizations

Schematic illustration for the synthesis of 3D-Sp-COF is depicted in Fig. 1a. Spirobifluorene core Sp-4(Ph-NH2) was synthesized by Suzuki cross-coupling reaction (Supplementary Figs. 14). 3D COF (3D-Sp-COF) with spirobifluorene core and imine bonds was prepared by the solvothermal reaction between Sp-4(Ph-NH2) and terephthalaldehyde (Ph-2CHO) with an acetic acid catalyst at 120 °C (Supplementary Fig. 5). For comparison, polymerization between Sp-4(Ph-NH2) and 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalaldehyde was also conducted under the same conditions to afford 3D-SpOH-COF (Supplementary Fig. 5). 3D-Sp-COF and 3D-SpOH-COF were isolated as yellow microgranular powder in 72% and orange powder in 68% yield, respectively. The crystalline nature of 3D-Sp-COF was determined by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) (Fig. 1b). As shown in the experimental PXRD pattern (Fig. 1b, black curve), 3D-Sp-COF exhibited intense diffraction peaks (2θ) at 4.73°, 9.52°, 12.36°, and 14.13° corresponding to the (200), (400), (411), and (501) Bragg planes of the space group I41/AMD, respectively, indicating high crystallinity of the resulting 3D COF. 3D-SpOH-COF exhibited intense diffraction peaks (2θ) at 4.17°, 8.46°, 10.07°, 12.76°, 13.92°, 19.78°, and 14.13° corresponding to the (200), (400), (211), (411), (431), and (631), respectively (Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7). Pawley refined PXRD patterns (Supplementary Fig. 6, red) with negligible difference (residuals Rp = 6.58%, Rwp = 12.18% for 3D-Sp-COF and residuals Rp = 6.53%, Rwp = 11.75% for 3D-SpOH-COF) compared favorably with the experimental patterns, which shows that the obtained crystal structure is very close to the predicted structure. To illustrate the lattice packing, the crystal models were constructed by employing Materials Studio 8.0 software package. Considering that 3D-Sp-COF was composed of tetragonal disphenoid-shaped spirobifluorene core and linear imine bonds, the possible lattice structures with different interpenetration degrees were proposed to demonstrate a fold-interpenetrated diamond (dia) topology similar to the reported SP-3D-COF 1 and SP-3D-COF 2 (ref. 53). According to the detailed simulation, the calculated PXRD pattern of 3D-Sp-COF (Fig. 1b, red curve) of sevenfold-interpenetrated diamond (dia-c7) net with I41/AMD symmetry was consistent with the experimental results. The refinement data of 3D-Sp-COF (a = b = 35.554 Å, c = 11.351 Å, α = β = γ = 90.0°) and 3D-SpOH-COF (a = b = 41.6510 Å, c = 9.9993 Å, α = β = γ = 90.0°, Fig. S5) both yielded a unit cell with parameters nearly equivalent to those of suggested models. The other possible lattice structures with non-, twofold-, threefold-, fourfold-, fivefold-, and sixfold-interpenetrated diamond topologies for 3D-Sp-COF were constructed with different space groups (Supplementary Figs. 814). However, the simulated PXRD patterns of these hypothetical topologies were not in agreement with the experimental results. Obviously, the lattice structures of 3D-Sp-COF and 3D-SpOH-COF (dia-c7) are different from those of SP-3D-COF 1 (dia-c6)53, which may play a role to affect the micro-morphology of the resulting COFs.

Fig. 1. Synthesis and characterization of 3D-Sp-COFs.

Fig. 1

a Schematic illustration for the synthesis of 3D-Sp-COF (@m h is on behalf of the reaction time). b The experimental PXRD profiles of 3D-Sp-COF (black curve) compared with theoretical PXRD calculated from crystal models with different degrees of interpenetration. c Unit cell, top view, and side view of the cell of 3D-Sp-COF (dia-c7): C, gray; N, blue; H, white.

To elucidate the Schiff-base polymerization, Fourier transform infrared spectra of Sp-4(Ph-NH2), Ph-2CHO, and 3D-Sp-COF were tested (Supplementary Fig. 15). The aldehyde band at 1703 cm−1 and the N–H stretching band at 3372 cm−1 were significantly weakened after the Schiff-base reaction. However, the new C = N stretching band at 1625 cm−1 was significantly enhanced, which suggested the formation of the imine linkage in this 3D COF. Note that the C = O stretching band at 1703 cm−1 appeared in 3D-Sp-COF, probably due to moisture included in the pores. According to thermogravimetric analysis, 3D-Sp-COF showed an excellent thermal stability up to 475 °C (Supplementary Fig. 16). As shown in Fig. 2, 3D-Sp-COF is prone to transport ions (such as Li+) more efficiently. As predicted, the lithium-ion transference number (t+) of 3D-Sp-COF of 0.7 is recorded (Supplementary Table 1), which overwhelms most typical polyethylene oxide (PEO)-based polymer electrolytes54,55 and even comparable to the signal-ion electrolyte systems5658. According to the results, ion conduction pathways provided by 3D COFs play a positive role on improving the ion transport. The lithium ion cell has a discharge capacity of 130, 120, and 75 mA h g−1 at the current densities of 54, 105, and 210 µA, respectively, suggesting superior cell performance using 3D-Sp-COF-based electrolyte (Supplementary Fig. 17). The lithium ion migration phenomenon of 3D-Sp-COF is explained by density functional theory calculation. Specifically, lithium ion migration in the pores is studied by comparing three pathways (x-axis pathway, y-axis pathway, and z-axis pathway; Supplementary Fig. 18). The results show that the Li-ion migration along the x-axis pathway and z-axis pathway require a lower energy barrier (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Table 2) as compared to that along the y-axis pathway. This preferred x- and z-axial Li-ion migration could be attributed to the shorter hopping distances, which is promoted by the N atoms of Schiff-base.

Fig. 2. The lithium ion migration characterization of 3D-Sp-COF.

Fig. 2

a The chronoamperometry of the Li/3D-Sp-COF/Li symmetric cells (experiment condition: ambient temperature, potential step of 10 mV). The insets present the EIS before and after polarization at ambient temperature. b Theoretical calculation of Li-ion migration behaviors inside the pore (top) with corresponding energy diagrams (bottom). The initial, transition, and final states are abbreviated as IS, TS, and FS, respectively.

Morphology characterizations

Interestingly, well-defined hollow spherical structures were observed for 3D-Sp-COF with an average diameter of 500–700 nm (Supplementary Fig. 19). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first hollow spheres based on 3D COFs. Similarly, 3D-SpOH-COF also forms well-defined spherical structure (Supplementary Fig. 20). Unlike hollow sphere structure of 3D-Sp-COF, 3D-SpOH-COF shows a solid sphere structure even with reaction time over 96 h (Supplementary Fig. 20b, 3D-SpOH-COF@96 h). In contrast, although SP-3D-COF 1 with similar spirobifluorene backbone structures shows the characteristics of crystallization, it exists in the form of irregular microcrystals53, whereas its long-range ordering growth in the nano/microdomain may have been limited due to the internal defects and kinetic trapping of smaller grains. The results suggest that the formation of spherical structure is closely related to chemical structures of the monomers, the reaction conditions, the type of unit cells, and the symmetry groups. To understand the formation mechanism of hollow spheres, the morphological changes at different reaction time (6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h) were studied by means of field emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and SEM-energy-dispersive spectrum (EDS) mapping (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 21). As shown in Fig. 3a, these nanospheres grew up gradually and formed uniform spherical structures with diameters of 500–700 nm as the reaction time increased. The rough surface on the wall of these nanospheres gradually became smooth. The size of the spheres increased obviously at the beginning of the reaction. After 24 h, the spheres size increased slowly and approximately keeps almost consistent with the increase of reaction time. It is important to note that the structure tend to be strong and stable only when the reaction time is long enough (>48 h). Otherwise, the structure will collapse during the washing process. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 22, the structure of 3D-Sp-COF@12 h was decomposed from nanopheres into irregular blocks after repeated washing. Furthermore, TEM images provided useful information to explore the growth pattern of these hollow spheres (Fig. 3b). It was found that 3D-Sp-COF@72 h from different experiment batches presented hollow spherical morphologies such as complete hollow spheres, symmetric core–shell hollow spheres, and asymmetric core–shell hollow spheres, which may originate from the packing of original nanoparticles and ripening characteristics. 3D-Sp-COF was also tested after soaking in different solvents for 2 h. Impressively, the crystal form and spherical structures of 3D-Sp-COF remained basically unchanged after treating by different solvents, which shows that 3D-Sp-COF has a good chemical stability (Supplementary Fig. 23). Various hollow spherical structures were also measured by SEM-EDS mapping (Fig. 3c). Based on these data, the construction process of these hollow spherical structures is similar to those of inorganic and organic hollow nanostructures, in which Ostwald ripening dominated the growth of spherical structures5961.

Fig. 3. Structural characterization of 3D-Sp-COFs by different microscopic techniques.

Fig. 3

a FE-SEM images. b TEM images, 72 h (1)–(4) represents 3D-Sp-COF@72 h synthesized from different experimental batches. c SEM-energy-dispersive spectrum (EDS) elemental mapping images: solid sphere (left), full hollowing sphere (middle), and homogeneous core–shell sphere (right).

Mechanism of hollow sphere formation

Detailed Ostwald-ripening mechanism of hollow spheres based on 3D-Sp-COF is illustrated in Fig. 4. Firstly, due to the Schiff-base polymerization, a large number of small 3D COF microcrystals nucleate from solution and rapidly assemble into larger solid microspheres to reduce the surface energy. Subsequently, the size and density of the solid microspheres continue to grow. In the process of solid growth, the crystal structure on the spherical surface can facilitate the formation of nanoparticles outside the spheres to produce coarse microspheres (Fig. 4a). Next, the surfaces of these crystal microspheres gradually become smooth due to the presence of unreacted amino or aldehyde end functional groups (Fig. 4b). Meanwhile, the crystallization of 3D COF microspheres yielded hollow shell microspheres and microporosity via inside-out Ostwald-ripening mechanism (Fig. 4c). In this case, microspheres finally evolve into complete hollow spheres (Fig. 4d), symmetric core–shell spheres (Fig. 4e), and asymmetric core-shell spheres (Fig. 4f). As shown in Fig. 4, the complete hollow spheres evolve from the center of solid microspheres. The evacuation of symmetric core–shell spheres and asymmetric core–shell spheres begins at the surface of the solid particles62. Since the asymmetric Ostwald ripening occurs in the area with lower crystal density, the solid microspheres evolve into asymmetric core–shell spheres or more complex morphologies63.

Fig. 4. Self-templated hollowing evolvement process of 3D-Sp-COFs via Ostwald ripening mechanism.

Fig. 4

a Extinction of small particles and growth of large particles and continuous growth of large particles with dense cores and rough surfaces; b crystallites on the surface to achieve a smooth morphology; c dissolution and outmigration of inner crystallites; d formation of complete hollow spheres; e formation of symmetric core–shell hollow spheres; f formation of asymmetric core–shell hollow spheres.

Gas adsorption

The permanent porosity of 3D-Sp-COFs at various reaction time was characterized by the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K (Supplementary Figs. 2428). As shown in Fig. 5a, all 3D-Sp-COFs showed a type I isotherm with significant increase under low relative pressure region (P/P0 < 0.05), demonstrating as a typical property of microporous molecule. The nonlocal density functional theory showed pore size distributions with a major pore width of 1.86 nm for 3D-Sp-COF@72 h and 3D-Sp-COF@96 h (Supplementary Fig. 29). What is more, the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of 3D-Sp-COFs increased with the increment of reaction time. The BET surface area were calculated as 508, 550, 651, 965, and 1016 m2 g−1 for 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, respectively. Meanwhile, the total pore volume (VP) increased from 0.24 to 0.47 cm3 g−1 (P/P0 = 0.99). Based on these data, the specific surface area of hollow microspheres increased significantly compared with that of the solid microspheres.

Fig. 5. The porosity of 3D-Sp-COFs.

Fig. 5

a N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of 3D-Sp-COF@m h (m = 12, 24, 48, 72, 96). b The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area of 3D-Sp-COF-3@m h (m = 12, 24, 48, 72, 96).

Electrochemical performance

Inspired by our previous work6466, the large surface area and conjugated microporous property of 3D-Sp-COFs suggest potential applications in supercapacitance. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) experiments for 3D-Sp-COFs were performed to explore the electrochemical characteristics (Supplementary Figs. 3035). The reversible redox peaks in the CV plots indicate the specific capacitance is pseudocapacitive in nature. The area under the CV curve of 3D-Sp-COF@96 h with well-defined hollow spherical structure is significantly larger than that of 3D-Sp-COF@6 h for nanoparticles, indicating that the uniform hollow spherical structures are beneficial to improving the capacitance performance (Fig. 6a). It was further verified by GCD test (Fig. 6b). The capacitance performance increases with the increment of reaction time, matching well with CV data mentioned above. The calculated specific capacitances for 3D-Sp-COF@6 h, 3D-Sp-COF@12 h, 3D-Sp-COF@24 h, 3D-Sp-COF@48 h, 3D-Sp-COF@72 h, and 3D-Sp-COF@96 h are 45, 64, 86, 100, 180, and 251 F g−1, respectively, at current densities of 0.5 A g−1. Most notably, the specific capacitance of uniform hollow spheres 3D-Sp-COF@96 h is more than twice that of the solid spheres 3D-Sp-COF@48 h. As far as we are concerned, the excellent capacitive value of hollow spheres based on 3D-Sp-COF is superior to that of 2D COF-based materials previously reported (Supplementary Table 3). Moreover, the capacitance performance overwhelms those of porous electrode molecules, including metal organic frameworks, conjugated microporous polymers, porous triazine-based frameworks, and N-doped carbon nanotubes (Supplementary Table 4)6769. In order to study the capacitance stability at high power density, the specific capacitances at different current densities (0.125–15 A g−1) were tested (Fig. 6c). The specific capacitance of 3D-Sp-COF@96 h maintained above 191 F g−1 at a high current density of 15 A g−1, implying that such excellent capacitance behaviors can still remained at high power density due to the stable hollow spherical structures. Subsequently, the cycling stability of 3D-Sp-COF@96 h was investigated at current density of 3 A g−1 (Fig. 6d). Unexpectedly, the specific capacitance increased dramatically with the increase of cycle numbers, reaching a maximum of 364 F g−1 at the 6000th cycle. Even after 8000 cycles, the specific capacitance remained at 316 F g−1, which was 1.4 times as large as the initial value. The increase of specific capacitance during cyclic scanning may be ascribed to the wetting activation of the hollow spheres, which leads to the effective transport of electrolyte ions in the ordered channels. The electron and ion transport characteristics of the 3D-Sp-COF@96 h were further studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 36). The Nyquist curve shows a steep straight line in the low-frequency region with a small intercept, indicating ideal capacitance behaviors. In addition, there is almost no semicircle in the high frequency region, suggesting that its conductivity is relatively ideal.

Fig. 6. Electrochemical performance of 3D-Sp-COFs.

Fig. 6

a CVs at 50 mV s−1. b GCDs at 0.5 A g−1. c Specific capacitance dependence on current density. d Long-term cyclic stability performance of 3D-Sp-COF@96 h at 3 A g−1 in 6 M KOH electrolyte. Inset: GCD curves of the 500th and the 6000th cycle, respectively.

Discussion

In summary, a set of highly conjugated 3D-Sp-COFs was designed and synthesized, beginning from tetrahedral tetraamine and terephthalaldehyde with spirobifluorene core structure as building blocks by means of imine condensation reactions. PXRD patterns and modeling studies demonstrated these 3D COFs are seven-fold-interpenetrated microporous diamond (dia-c7) net with I41/AMD symmetry. Remarkably, 3D-Sp-COF crystallites self-assembled into uniform hollow microspheres with narrow size distribution (500–700 nm) and large surface area (1016 m2 g−1), which were proved by SEM, TEM, EDS, and BET investigations. The mechanism of hollow spheres formation was studied using a detailed real-time tracking method, indicating that the formation of hollow spheres is the result of Ostwald ripening mechanism. In the Li/3D-COF/Li symmetric cells, ion conduction pathways provided by 3D COF are beneficial for enhancing the ion transport and the t+ of 3D-Sp-COF approaches 0.7. The value overwhelms most of the typical PEO-based polymer electrolytes and even comparable to the signal-ion electrolyte systems. Because of the large surface area and hollow spherical architecture, the 3D COF shows a high specific capacitance of 251 F g−1 at a current density of 0.5 A g−1, which is superior to the vast majority of 2D COFs and other porous electrode materials. Remarkably, the specific capacitance increases dramatically with the numbers of cycles, achieving a maximum of 364 F g−1 at the 6000th cycle due to the wetting activation of the hollow spheres. This study provides a feasible morphological modulation strategy to improve the electrochemical characteristics, which provides a deep insight into the design and synthesis of efficient and stable electrode materials for energy storage applications.

Methods

Materials

2,2′,7,7′-Tetrabromo-9,9′-spirobifluorene, 4-aminophenylboronic acid pinacol ester, terephthalaldehyde, and 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalaldehyde were purchased from Energy Chemical. All other reagents and solvents were commercially available and used as received.

Synthesis of 3D-Sp-COF

A Pyrex tube was charged with 4,4′,4″,4‴-(9,9′-spirobifluorene-2,2′,7,7′-tetrayl)tetraaniline (68.1 mg, 0.1 mmol), terephthalaldehyde (26.8 mg, 0.2 mmol), and solvent mixture of 1,2-dichlorobenzene/n-butanol/6 M aqueous acetic acid (7:3:1, by volume). This mixture was sonicated for 5 min in order to get a homogeneous dispersion. The tube was then flash frozen at 77 K (liquid N2 bath), degassed by freeze–pump–thaw technique for three times. The tube was sealed off and then placed in an oven at 120 °C for a certain period of time (6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 h). The resulting precipitate was filtered, washed with anhydrous tetrahydrofuran, and extracted by Soxhlet extractor for 24 h. The solid was dried at 80 °C under vacuum for 12 h to afford yellow powder (63.0 mg, 72% yield).

Synthesis of 3D-SpOH-COF

A Pyrex tube was charged with 4,4′,4″,4‴-(9,9′-spirobifluorene-2,2′,7,7′-tetrayl)tetraaniline (68.1 mg, 0.1 mmol), 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalaldehyde (33.2 mg, 0.2 mmol), and solvent mixture of 1,2-dichlorobenzene/n-butanol/6 M aqueous acetic acid (8:5:1, by volume). This mixture was sonicated for 5 min in order to get a homogeneous dispersion. The tube was then flash frozen at 77 K (liquid N2 bath), degassed by a freeze–pump–thaw technique for three times. The tube was sealed off and then placed in an oven at 120 °C for a certain period of time (12, 24, 48, 72, 96 h). The resulting precipitate was filtered, washed with anhydrous tetrahydrofuran, and extracted by a Soxhlet extractor for 24 h. The solid was dried at 80 °C under vacuum for 12 h to afford orange powder (63.9 mg, 68% yield).

Supplementary information

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21835003, 91833304, 21674050, 21422402, 61704077, 62005126), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2017YFB0404501, 2014CB648300), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BE2019120), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M650121, 2016M601784, 2017M620519, 2017T100358), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (1701135B), Program for Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professor (RK030STP15001), the Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province (TD-XCL-009), the 333 Project of Jiangsu Province (BRA2017402), the NUPT “1311 Project” and the NUPT Scientific Foundation (NY219021, NY218164, NY217169), the Leading Talent of Technological Innovation of National Ten-Thousands Talents Program of China, the Excellent Scientific and Technological Innovative Teams of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (TJ217038), the Synergetic Innovation Center for Organic Electronics and Information Displays, and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Author contributions

Y.-Y.L. and X.-C.L. contributed to the material synthesis, theoretical calculation, and the mechanism analysis. S.W. performed X-ray diffraction and chronoamperometry measurements. T.C. and C.L. performed CV and GCD measurements. H.Y. performed TEM measurements. Y.G. performed TGA and FT-IR measurements. W.-Y.L. and W.H. contributed to overall experimental design and supervised the project. Y.-Y.L., X.-C.L., and W.-Y.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Data availability

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions given in the paper are present in the Article and Supplementary Information. Any additional data related to this paper may be requested from the corresponding authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Yuan-Yuan Liu, Xiang-Chun Li.

Contributor Information

Wen-Yong Lai, Email: iamwylai@njupt.edu.cn.

Wei Huang, Email: iamwhuang@nwpu.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-020-18844-4.

References

  • 1.Yuan S, et al. Covalent organic frameworks for membrane separation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48:2665–2681. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00919H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fan H, et al. Covalent organic framework-covalent organic framework bilayer membranes for highly selective gas separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:10094–10098. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b05136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yan S, et al. Three-dimensional salphen-based covalent-organic frameworks as catalytic antioxidants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:2920–2924. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b00485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang X, et al. Sulfone-containing covalent organic frameworks for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water. Nat. Chem. 2018;10:1180–1189. doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0141-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.DeBlase CR, et al. β-Ketoenamine-linked covalent organic frameworks capable of pseudocapacitive energy storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:16821–16824. doi: 10.1021/ja409421d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen X, et al. High‐lithium‐affinity chemically exfoliated 2D covalent organic frameworks. Adv. Mater. 2019;31:1901640. doi: 10.1002/adma.201901640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xiong Y, et al. Ultrahigh responsivity photodetectors of 2D covalent organic frameworks integrated on graphene. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:1907242. doi: 10.1002/adma.201907242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Keller N, et al. Oligothiophene-bridged conjugated covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:8194–8199. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kulkarni R, et al. Real-time optical and electronic sensing with a β-amino enone linked, triazine-containing 2D covalent organic framework. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3228. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11264-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cui W-R, et al. Regenerable and stable sp2 carbon-conjugated covalent organic frameworks for selective detection and extraction of uranium. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:436. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14289-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zwaneveld NA, et al. Organized formation of 2D extended covalent organic frameworks at surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:6678–6679. doi: 10.1021/ja800906f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gole, B. et al. Microtubular self-assembly of covalent organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.57, 846–850 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Kandambeth S, et al. Self-templated chemically stable hollow spherical covalent organic framework. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:6786. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Long J, et al. Bi2MoO6 nanobelts for crystal facet‐enhanced photocatalysis. Small. 2014;10:2791–2795. doi: 10.1002/smll.201302950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Peng Y, et al. Ultrathin two-dimensional covalent organic framework nanosheets: preparation and application in highly sensitive and selective DNA detection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:8698–8704. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b04096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang Z, et al. Activatable semiconducting theranostics: simultaneous generation and ratiometric photoacoustic imaging of reactive oxygen species in vivo. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1707509. doi: 10.1002/adma.201707509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mitra S, et al. Targeted drug delivery in covalent organic nanosheets (CONs) via sequential postsynthetic modification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:4513–4520. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b00925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Strasser P, Gliech M, Kuehl S, Moeller T. Electrochemical processes on solid shaped nanoparticles with defined facets. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47:715–735. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00759K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang S, et al. Exfoliation of covalent organic frameworks into few-layer redox-active nanosheets as cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:4258–4261. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b02648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haase F, et al. Topochemical conversion of an imine-into a thiazole-linked covalent organic framework enabling real structure analysis. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2600. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04979-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nguyen V, Grünwald M. Microscopic origins of poor crystallinity in the synthesis of covalent organic framework COF-5. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:3306–3311. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b12529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Halder A, et al. Decoding the morphological diversity in two dimensional crystalline porous polymers by core planarity modulation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:7806–7810. doi: 10.1002/anie.201600087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bi S, et al. Two-dimensional semiconducting covalent organic frameworks via condensation at arylmethyl carbon atoms. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2467. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10504-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ma T, et al. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction structures of covalent organic frameworks. Science. 2018;361:48–52. doi: 10.1126/science.aat7679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ascherl L, et al. Molecular docking sites designed for the generation of highly crystalline covalent organic frameworks. Nat. Chem. 2016;8:310–316. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2444. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cote AP, et al. Porous, crystalline, covalent organic frameworks. Science. 2005;310:1166–1170. doi: 10.1126/science.1120411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Banerjee T, et al. Sub-stoichiometric 2D covalent organic frameworks from tri-and tetratopic linkers. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2689. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10574-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wei S, et al. Semiconducting 2D triazine-cored covalent organic frameworks with unsubstituted olefin linkages. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:14272–14279. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b06219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tan J, et al. Manipulation of amorphous-to-crystalline transformation: towards the construction of covalent organic framework hybrid microspheres with NIR photothermal conversion ability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:13979–13984. doi: 10.1002/anie.201606155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Karak S, et al. Constructing ultraporous covalent organic frameworks in seconds via an organic terracotta process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:1856–1862. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b08815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Beaudoin D, Maris T, Wuest JD. Constructing monocrystalline covalent organic networks by polymerization. Nat. Chem. 2013;5:830. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Evans AM, et al. Seeded growth of single-crystal two-dimensional covalent organic frameworks. Science. 2018;361:52–57. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Matsumoto M, et al. Lewis-acid-catalyzed interfacial polymerization of covalent organic framework films. Chem. 2018;4:308–317. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang H, et al. Recent progress in covalent organic framework thin films: fabrications, applications and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48:488–516. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00376A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dey K, et al. Selective molecular separation by interfacially crystallized covalent organic framework thin films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:13083–13091. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b06640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yu F, et al. Photostimulus‐responsive large‐area two‐dimensional covalent organic framework films. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58:16101–16104. doi: 10.1002/anie.201909613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Khayum MA, et al. Chemically delaminated free‐standing ultrathin covalent organic nanosheets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:15604–15608. doi: 10.1002/anie.201607812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ying Y, et al. Ultrathin two-dimensional membranes assembled by ionic covalent organic nanosheets with reduced apertures for gas separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:4472–4480. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b13825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhu H-J, et al. Efficient electron transmission in covalent organic framework nanosheets for highly active electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:497. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14237-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.El‐Mahdy AF, et al. A hollow microtubular triazine-and benzobisoxazole-based covalent organic framework presenting sponge-like shells that functions as a high-performance supercapacitor. Chem. Asian J. 2019;14:1429–1435. doi: 10.1002/asia.201900296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lu Z, et al. A hollow microshuttle-shaped capsule covalent organic framework for protein adsorption. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2019;7:1469–1474. doi: 10.1039/C8TB02870B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wan S, et al. A belt‐shaped, blue luminescent, and semiconducting covalent organic framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:8826–8830. doi: 10.1002/anie.200803826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Huang W, et al. Solvothermal synthesis of microporous, crystalline covalent organic framework nanofibers and their colorimetric nanohybrid structures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2013;5:8845–8849. doi: 10.1021/am402649g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang S, et al. Reversible polycondensation-termination growth of covalent-organic-framework spheres, fibers, and films. Matter. 2019;1:1592–1605. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2019.08.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ma W, et al. Size-controllable synthesis of uniform spherical covalent organic frameworks at room temperature for highly efficient and selective enrichment of hydrophobic peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:18271–18277. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b09189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sasmal HS, et al. Covalent self-assembly in two dimensions: connecting covalent organic framework nanospheres into crystalline and porous thin films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:20371–20379. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b10788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baldwin LA, Crowe JW, Pyles DA, McGrier PL. Metalation of a mesoporous three-dimensional covalent organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:15134–15137. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b10316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang Y, et al. Three‐dimensional anionic cyclodextrin‐based covalent organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:16313–16317. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Liu Y, et al. 3D covalent organic frameworks of interlocking 1D square ribbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;141:677–683. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b12177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lin G, et al. 3D porphyrin-based covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:8705–8709. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b04141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ma Y-X, et al. A dynamic three-dimensional covalent organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:4995–4998. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ding H, et al. An AIEgen-based 3D covalent organic framework for white light-emitting diodes. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:5234. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07670-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wu C, et al. Highly conjugated three-dimensional covalent organic frameworks based on spirobifluorene for perovskite solar cell enhancement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:10016–10024. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b06291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ghosh A, Wang C, Kofinas P. Block copolymer solid battery electrolyte with high Li-ion transference number. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010;157:A846–A849. doi: 10.1149/1.3428710. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhou W, et al. Plating a dendrite-free lithium anode with a polymer/ceramic/polymer sandwich electrolyte. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:9385–9388. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b05341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhou D, et al. Stable conversion chemistry-based lithium metal batteries enabled by hierarchical multifunctional polymer electrolytes with near-single ion conduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58:6001–6006. doi: 10.1002/anie.201901582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang H, et al. Single lithium-ion conducting solid polymer electrolytes: advances and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46:797–815. doi: 10.1039/C6CS00491A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Watanabe M, Tokuda H, Muto S. Anionic effect on ion transport properties in network polyether electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta. 2001;46:1487–1491. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00743-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mao B, et al. Solubility‐parameter‐guided solvent selection to initiate Ostwald ripening for interior space‐tunable structures with architecture‐dependent electrochemical performance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018;57:446–450. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Xie J, et al. Intralayered Ostwald ripening to ultrathin nanomesh catalyst with robust oxygen‐evolving performance. Adv. Mater. 2017;29:1604765. doi: 10.1002/adma.201604765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shen L, et al. Self‐templated formation of uniform NiCo2O4 hollow spheres with complex interior structures for lithium‐ion batteries and supercapacitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:1868–1872. doi: 10.1002/anie.201409776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tian XL, et al. Nearly monodisperse ferroelectric BaTiO3 hollow nanoparticles: size-related solid evacuation in ostwald-ripening-lnduced hollowing process. Cryst. Growth Des. 2010;10:3990–3995. doi: 10.1021/cg1005727. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Liu B, Zeng HC. Symmetric and asymmetric Ostwald ripening in the fabrication of homogeneous core-shell semiconductors. Small. 2005;1:566–571. doi: 10.1002/smll.200500020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Li X-C, et al. Redox-active triazatruxene-based conjugated microporous polymers for high-performance supercapacitors. Chem. Sci. 2017;8:2959–2965. doi: 10.1039/C6SC05532J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhang YZ, et al. A simple approach to boost capacitance: flexible supercapacitors based on manganese oxides@ MOFs via chemically induced in situ self-transformation. Adv. Mater. 2016;28:5242–5248. doi: 10.1002/adma.201600319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhang Y-Z, et al. Printed supercapacitors: materials, printing and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48:3229–3264. doi: 10.1039/C7CS00819H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sun J, et al. A molecular pillar approach to grow vertical covalent organic framework nanosheets on graphene: hybrid materials for energy storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018;57:1034–1038. doi: 10.1002/anie.201710502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sheberla D, et al. Conductive MOF electrodes for stable supercapacitors with high areal capacitance. Nat. Mater. 2017;16:220. doi: 10.1038/nmat4766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Halder A, et al. Interlayer hydrogen-bonded covalent organic frameworks as high-performance supercapacitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:10941–10945. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b06460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions given in the paper are present in the Article and Supplementary Information. Any additional data related to this paper may be requested from the corresponding authors.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES