Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241718

Evaluation of bioabsorbable calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads for local delivery of carboplatin

Marine Traverson 1,*, Connor E Stewart 2, Mark G Papich 3
Editor: Simon Clegg4
PMCID: PMC7644016  PMID: 33151989

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate a novel kit of resorbable calcium sulfate beads marketed specifically for use in veterinary medicine and generally used for local delivery of antimicrobials as carboplatin-delivery system. The study characterized the elution of carboplatin in vitro, and investigated whether the initial dose and formulation of carboplatin, or the bead size significantly influences carboplatin elution in vitro. Calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads of 3- and 5-mm diameter were prepared. Five doses and two formulations of carboplatin (20, 50, 100, and 500 mg carboplatin per kit in powder formulation; 20 mg in liquid formulation) were tested in triplicates for each diameter beads. Beads were placed in 37°C phosphate buffered saline for 72 hours. Carboplatin concentrations in the eluent were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography at 11 time points with a modified United States Pharmacopeia assay. Concentrations of carboplatin in the eluent proportionally increased with the initial dose and peaked between 13 and 52 hours, ranging from 42.1% to 79.3% of the incorporated load. Higher peak concentrations, percentages released, and elution rates were observed with the liquid formulation and with higher carboplatin doses. There was no significant difference in maximum carboplatin concentrations between 3- and 5-mm diameter beads, but 5-mm diameter beads had slower elution rates. The novel kit can be used for preparation of carboplatin-impregnated resorbable calcium sulfate beads at variable doses, sizes and formulations. Further study is warranted to define the in vivo requirements and effective carboplatin dose, spatial diffusion and desired duration of elution.

Introduction

Carboplatin-impregnated biodegradable calcium sulfate beads are commercially available on the human pharmaceutical market (Osteoset resorbable mini bead kit, Wright Medical Technology Inc, Arlington, TN, USA; Stimulan Rapid Cure, Biocomposites Inc, Wilmington, NC, USA) and compounded at an accredited veterinary compounding pharmacy (Wedgewood Pharmacy, Swedesboro, NJ, USA). These drug-delivery systems carry the advantage of allowing high and sustained release of carboplatin locally in the tissue, with minimal systemic exposure. These properties enable local tumor control after marginal and/or incomplete excision [19], which is not uncommon in veterinary medicine when the extent of the lesion and/or ethical and economic factors limit wide tumor excision. Their use has been described in previous veterinary studies, and in vitro elution of platinum from these products has been reported [1, 2, 10]. However, compounded drugs are typically not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and no routine safety or efficacy control is performed by the agency [4, 11]. A recent study showed that the amount of carboplatin found in 3-mm diameter calcium sulfate beads compounded at an accredited veterinary pharmacy (Wedgewood Pharmacy, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) was highly variable between lots with a mean content of 10.24 ± 1.84 mg carboplatin per bead, which was twice as high as the labeled strength of 4.6 mg/bead [4].

The amount of platinum delivered in situ has been variable between studies, with a peak delivery at 12 hours in vitro ranging from 27 to 89% of the incorporated carboplatin [1, 2, 10]. The size of the beads significantly influences the rates of dissolution and elution in vitro, with 4.8-mm diameter beads producing significantly higher dissolution rate and longer elution time than 3-mm diameter beads [12]. This difference in dissolution and elution rate between beads of different sizes has not been confirmed in regards to carboplatin delivery. However, higher peak percentage of incorporated carboplatin released was reported with 3-mm compared to 4.8-mm diameter beads [10].

A novel kit of resorbable high purity alpha hemihydrate calcium sulfate beads (Kerrier Local Antibiotic Delivery, Palm Beach Garden, FL, USA) has been marketed specifically for use in veterinary medicine and local delivery of antimicrobials. This novel kit offers the flexibility of preparing the beads on demand prior to use while mixing the commercialized calcium sulfate powder and mixing solution (sterile saline) with an appropriate antimicrobial drug at the desired dose. The paste obtained is then plated in 3.0- or 5.0-mm diameter bead molds until complete set, and is typically ready for use within 15 to 45 minutes depending on the antimicrobial and formulation selected. No data is available regarding the use of the kit for local delivery of platinum agents.

The objective of this study was to (1) evaluate the use of the novel kit generally use for the local delivery of antimicrobial agents as a carrier for local delivery of carboplatin, (2) characterize the elution of carboplatin from the novel carboplatin-impregnated calcium sulfate beads in vitro, (3) investigate whether the initial dose and formulation of carboplatin, or the size of the beads significantly influence the elution rate and percentage of total incorporated carboplatin released.

The effective in vivo tissue concentration of carboplatin carrying antitumor effects is unknown. In vitro studies have evaluated the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of carboplatin for different neoplastic cell lines, which corresponds to the dose required to achieve 50% inhibition of neoplastic cell replication in vitro [1317].

We hypothesized that the novel calcium sulfate hemihydrate kit would be suitable for delivery of carboplatin, and that the drug would elute over 3 days in vitro at concentrations greater than the IC50 reported for different canine and feline neoplastic cell lines. We also hypothesized that the concentration of carboplatin in the eluent and the rate of elution would be positively associated with the dose and formulation of carboplatin as well as the size of the beads. While other studies have measured elemental platinum from elution experiments, we have chosen to measure intact carboplatin for this study as the release of platinum may be influenced by diverse factors that impact the degradation of carboplatin in the eluent.

Materials and methods

Pilot study

An initial pilot study was conducted to measure the standard elution profile of commercially available medical grade hemihydrate calcium sulfate beads (Absorbable bead kit, Kerrier Local Antibiotic Delivery, Palm Beach Garden, FL, USA; Ref 12–0125, Lot 04272016) impregnated with methylene blue (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Methylene blue is often used in pilot elution experiments because it is readily available and can be quickly and easily measured with a spectrophotometer. Beads were prepared using a dose equivalent to 100 mg methylene blue per kit and allowed to elute in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for six days. Temperature of 37°C and constant agitation were maintained in a shaker incubator (New Brunswick C25 Incubator Shaker, Edison, NJ, USA). Samples were taken at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 6 days, and the concentration of methylene blue was calculated from the absorbance measured using a VersaMax microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) set at a wavelength of 663 nm and a standard curve created with serial dilutions of methylene blue. Peak elution concentration was achieved after approximately 3 days, which guided our study to a duration of 72 hours when using carboplatin-impregnated beads.

Preparation of carboplatin-impregnated calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads

Five total formulations and doses of carboplatin were assessed: 20, 50, 100, and 500 mg carboplatin per kit in powder formulation (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; Category C2538 Lot MKCK1243, C2538 MKCF9647, C1096407 R064PO) and 20 mg carboplatin per kit in liquid formulation (Accord Healthcare, Durham, NC, USA) at 10 mg/mL. Considering the absence of literature reference or guidelines describing the local concentration of carboplatin required in the tissues, the different doses tested were selected arbitrarily taking into account the amount of powder and liquid (carboplatin) that could safely be added to the calcium sulfate powder without compromising the production of the beads.

Each kit was divided in half before mixing to form 3.0- and 5.0-mm diameter beads using the manufacturer’s standard preparation technique. Under a laminar flow biological safety cabinet (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), half of the total dose of carboplatin powder was added to half of the hemihydrate calcium sulfate powder, mixed with 2 mL mixing solution (half kit), and allowed to set for 60 min in the template until completely dry. The beads impregnated with the liquid formulation carboplatin were prepared using 1 mL of mixing solution and 1 mL of liquid formulation carboplatin (10 mg total). The procedure was repeated in triplicate for each bead size and carboplatin dose and formulation to obtain a mean of three measurements at each time point. Control beads of both sizes were prepared similarly, in triplicate, using a half kit of hemihydrate calcium sulfate powder with 2 mL mixing solution and no carboplatin. The beads were stored overnight in individual Erlenmeyer flasks at room temperature shielded from light. The following day, 200 mL PBS solution (pH 7.4) was added into each flask containing the beads, and the flask openings were covered with aluminum foil to prevent evaporative losses. Temperature and constant agitation were maintained at 37°C and 50 revolution per minute (rpm) in a shaker incubator, according to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) standards for dissolution testing [18]. The volume of the solvent used for dissolution was selected to avoid reaching the maximum thermodynamic solubility reported for carboplatin (15 mg/mL) [18].

Samples collection

The elution profile of carboplatin was measured over 72 hours. Immediately before addition of PBS to each flask, 1 mL sample of PBS solution was collected (time 0). Subsequent samples were collected at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours. The samples were stored at -80°C until the end of the elution study. After each sample collection, 1 mL of fresh PBS was added to the flask to maintain a constant volume of 200 mL. The temperature and agitation of the incubator were recorded before each sample collection, and the volume of solution in each flask was assessed to correct for any variation. The beads‘ dissolution was assessed subjectively by visual inspection.

Calculation of carboplatin concentration in the eluent

The concentration of carboplatin in each sample was evaluated using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). The Agilent 1260 series HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) consisting of a quaternary solvent delivery system, autosampler, and UV detector set at a wavelength of 220 nm was used for the analysis, and chromatograms were integrated in a computer program (Agilent OpenLab version C.01.09, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Retention times for the peaks of interest were measured between 3.6 and 3.7 minutes. Official USP analytic reference standard carboplatin (United States Pharmacopeia (USP), Rockville, Maryland, USA; Lot R01080, Catalog 1096407) was used to create a stock solution in 100% HPLC-grade distilled water at 1 mg/mL. Standard serial dilution series of the stock solution were generated with distilled water to prepare fortifying solutions for quality control and calibration. Eight calibration standards (range: 0 to 50 μg/mL) were completed by adding the fortifying solutions to the PBS solution. HPLC columns (Ace C18—AR stationary phase; Advanced Chromatography Technologies Ltd., Aberdeen, Scotland, UK) measuring 4.6 mm x 15 cm were used, and maintained at a constant temperature of 40°C. The mobile phase consisted of 100% HPLC grade distilled water (flow rate: 1 mL/min). A volume of 40 μL was loaded into HPLC vials for injection of all study samples, calibration samples, and control samples. The assay met acceptance criteria of the USP monograph for the testing of carboplatin [18]. The concentration obtained in a sample was multiplied by the total eluent volume (i.e. 200 mL) at the time of sample collection to calculate the total amount of carboplatin released in PBS. The result was expressed as a percentage of the initial dose of carboplatin incorporated into the beads.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (Version 9.4, SAS, Cary, NC, USA). Triplicate flasks were used for each carboplatin dose, formulation, and bead size, according to the solution protocols used in previous elution studies with a minimum statistical power of 80% [13]. This required results of the three replicates for each dose, formulation, and bead size to be reported as mean ± standard deviation. No outliers were removed from the analysis and there was no missing data.

Because the experiment was designed factorially with three replicates at each time point, a repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to analyze the percentage of carboplatin released. Fixed effects were all between-subject effects and included carboplatin dose, bead size, time, and all interactions between the three. A random replicate effect was used to account for individual variation in the construction and homogeneity of the beads (a within-subject effect). The covariance matrix was treated as unstructured, which was the model suggested using Akaike’s Information Criterion.

The peak percentage of carboplatin released, the peaking times of those maximal values, the rate of carboplatin released (calculated as the peak percentage released divided by the hours at which the peak percentage occurred), and the final concentrations were compared across doses and bead sizes using a two-factor ANOVA. Due to increasing variances with increasing means (heteroskedasticity), the rate values were natural-log transformed before the model was run.

The difference between liquid and powder percentages of carboplatin released were compared using a repeated-measures ANOVA allowing for fixed effects of carboplatin dose, bead size, time, and all interactions between the three, and a random replicate effect to account for individual variation in the construction and homogeneity of the beads. The covariance matrix was treated as first-order autoregressive moving average (ARMA(1,1)), which was the model suggested using Akaike’s Information Criterion.

In all linear models, results were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. Once an effect was found to be statistically significant, least squares means were compared using the Tukey correction for multiple comparisons.

Results

Bead preparation and study completion

All beads set and were ready for use within 45 to 60 minutes of preparation independently of the dose or the formulation of carboplatin used. The 5.0-mm diameter beads tended to require longer setting time than the 3.0-mm diameter beads. The beads demonstrated minor dissolution throughout the study period, with a subjectively roughened surface starting at 24 hours, and a mild progressive opacification of the PBS. No subjective difference was observed between flasks of different carboplatin doses, formulations or bead sizes.

All flasks maintained a volume of 200 mL of PBS through the entire study period, with the exception of two flasks in the 500 mg equivalent carboplatin dose group. One flask containing 3.0-mm diameter beads decreased to 195 mL PBS volume, and one flask of 5.0-mm diameter beads to 190 mL PBS. Those changes were most likely related to evaporative losses, despite the fact that each flask was covered with an aluminum foil. The carboplatin concentration values for these flasks were therefore adjusted at those particular time points to reflect the actual quantity of carboplatin available in 195 and 190 mL of PBS. In other words, the total quantity of carboplatin obtained in 1 mL of sampled PBS solution analyzed by HPLC was multiplied by 195, and 190 respectively instead of 200 in order to obtain the corrected total quantity of carboplatin in those 2 flasks at these specific time-points. The temperatures of the incubator at the time of sample collection ranged from 36.9 to 37.1°C, and the oscillation ranged from 50 to 51 rpm.

Carboplatin elution

Effect of carboplatin dose

The peak concentration of carboplatin achieved in the eluent increased proportionally with the carboplatin dose loaded into the beads (p = 0.001), with mean peak percentage of incorporated carboplatin released ranging from 42.1 to 79.3% of the initial dose (Table 1). The model indicated that carboplatin dose significantly impacted peaking time (p = 0.021), with a significant difference between the 500 mg dose, which had a mean time to peak of 13.5 hours, and all the other doses. The other doses did not differ significantly from each other, with mean peaking time ranging from 44 to 52 hours (all with SE = 3.9). Carboplatin dose had a significant effect on elution rate (p < 0.001). The highest dose (500 mg) released carboplatin at a significantly higher rate than all the other doses (p < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons), but the lower doses did not differ significantly from each other (p > 0.240 for all pairwise comparisons) (Fig 1).

Table 1. Peak carboplatin concentrations achieved in PBS after elution from calcium sulfate beads impregnated with different carboplatin doses.
Carboplatin dose (mg/kit) Peak carboplatin concentration (μg/mL; mean ± SD)
(peak percentage of incorporated carboplatin released)
3-mm beads 5-mm beads Both sizes combined
(n = 3) (n = 3) (n = 6)
0 0.02 ± 0.05 0.0 ± 0.00 0.0 ± 0.03
(0%) (0%) (0%)
20 27.67 ± 4.17 21.07 ± 6.30 24.4 ± 6.00
(55.3%) (42.1%) (48.7%)
50 67.77 ± 15.00 72.27 ± 13.87 70.02 ± 13.15
(54.2%) (57.8%) (56.0%)
100 157.20 ± 20.06 172.76 ± 24.55 164.98 ± 21.79
(62.9%) (69.1%) (66.0%)
500 991.33 ± 16.01 844.00 ± 141.27 903.83 ± 113.31
(79.3%) (67.5%) (72.3%)

All carboplatin doses indicated refer to the powder formulation. Dilution factor: 0.

Fig 1. Mean peak percentage of incorporated carboplatin released achieved in PBS after elution from calcium sulfate beads impregnated with different carboplatin doses.

Fig 1

Percentages are shown for 3-mm and 5-mm diameter beads. Powder formulation constant.

Effect of carboplatin formulation

When comparing powder to liquid formulations, the only carboplatin dose tested was 20 mg as higher doses would have exceeded the recommended amount of solution used per kit (when maintaining half dilution with the mixing solution). The 3.0- and 5.0-mm diameter beads released a peak of 55.3% and 42.1% of incorporated carboplatin from the powder formulation, respectively, and 76.7% and 82.7% of incorporated carboplatin from the liquid formulation, respectively (Table 2). Beads prepared with the powder formulation produced a continuous carboplatin release over up to 52 hours, while a drop was observed with the liquid formulation after peaking at 9 and 12 hours for the 3.0- and 5.0-mm diameter beads, respectively (Fig 2). When holding bead size constant, the liquid formulation was associated with a higher peak carboplatin concentration achieved in the eluent (p < 0.001), a higher percentage of incorporated carboplatin released (p < 0.001), as well as a significantly higher elution rate (p < 0.001).

Table 2. Mean peak carboplatin concentrations achieved in PBS after elution from calcium sulfate beads impregnated with different carboplatin formulations.
Carboplatin formulation Peak carboplatin concentration (μg/mL; mean ± SD) (peak percentage of incorporated carboplatin released)
3-mm beads 5-mm beads Both sizes combined
(n = 3) (n = 3) (n = 6)
Powder 27.66 ± 4.17 21.07 ± 6.30 24.37 ± 6.00
(55.3%) (42.1%) (48.7%)
Liquid 38.33 ± 3.51 41.33 ± 2.52 39.7 ± 2.73
(76.7%) (82.7%) (79.3%)

Total dose of 20 mg carboplatin per kit maintained constant. Dilution factor: 0.

Fig 2. Total percentage of incorporated carboplatin released achieved in PBS after elution from calcium sulfate beads impregnated with different carboplatin formulations.

Fig 2

Percentages are shown for 3-mm and 5-mm diameter beads. Carboplatin dose constant at 20 mg.

Effect of bead size

The model indicated that bead size did not significantly impact mean peak percentage of incorporated carboplatin released (F(1,19) = 0.72, p = 0.408), nor mean percentage of incorporated carboplatin released at 72 hours (F(1,19) = 0.04, p = 0.708). However, bead size had a significant impact on peaking time (F(3,19) = 21.37, p < 0.001), without interaction with carboplatin dose (F(3,16) = 0.06, p = 0.980). The mean time to peak for the 3-mm diameter beads was 35 hours (SE = 2.74), while the 5-mm diameter beads peaked at 44.8 hours (SE = 2.74). Bead size also significantly impacted elution rate (F(1,19) = 8.22, p = 0.010), and smaller beads released carboplatin at a higher rate.

Comparison to half maximal inhibitory concentrations of reported neoplastic cell lines

Peak carboplatin concentrations achieved in the eluent with a half kit of calcium sulfate beads exceeded the reported in vitro carboplatin IC50 values of various canine and feline neoplastic cell lines for most carboplatin doses. The reported IC50 values of canine melanoma (2.3 μg/mL; 6.1 μM) [15] and malignant mammary tumor (11.3 μg/mL; 30.5 μM) [13] were exceeded by all doses and carboplatin formulations at both bead sizes (Tables 1 and 2). The reported IC50 values of feline injection site sarcoma (11.3–32.5 μg/mL; 30.5–87.5 μM) [16], canine osteosarcoma (37.1 μg/mL; 100 μM) [14], and canine transitional cell carcinoma (19.5–52.2 μg/mL; 52.4–140.5 μM) [17] were exceeded by the peak carboplatin concentrations obtained from the half kits mixed with 50, 100, and 500 mg equivalent carboplatin dose per kit (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Comparison between concentration of incorporated carboplatin released achieved in PBS after elution from calcium sulfate beads and half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of carboplatin for different neoplastic cell lines.

Fig 3

Carboplatin concentration is shown for 3-mm diameter beads, 50 mg carboplatin dose, and powder formulation.

Discussion

This study evaluated the use of a novel kit of resorbable high purity alpha hemihydrate calcium sulfate beads (Kerrier Local Antibiotic Delivery, Palm Beach Garden, FL, USA) marketed specifically for use in veterinary medicine and generally used for local delivery of antimicrobials as a potential drug delivery system for carboplatin. The kit appeared suitable for use with carboplatin at variable doses and formulations, and required a total preparation time of 45 to 60 minutes. Carboplatin-impregnated calcium sulfate beads delivered peak in vitro carboplatin concentrations proportional to the initial carboplatin dose, with peak concentrations achieved predominantly at 48 hours and ranging from 42 to 79% of the initial incorporated carboplatin dose. Three main observations were made: (1) carboplatin concentrations in the eluent were significantly higher and the drug eluted faster when the liquid formulation was used as opposed to the powder formulation; (2) the bead size influenced the rate of carboplatin elution proportionally to the initial carboplatin dose but did not affect the total concentration of carboplatin eluted in solution; and (3) the percentage of total incorporated carboplatin released and the elution rate were proportionally higher as the initial carboplatin loading dose increased.

Carboplatin formulation had the largest effect on drug elution. Beads prepared with the liquid formulation released 1.4 to 2 times more carboplatin proportionally than beads prepared with the powder formulation. To our knowledge, no previous study described such a difference in dissolution or elution between liquid and powder formulations of any drug loaded into calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads. The reasons for these differences are undetermined without further undue study. We ruled out pH differences as we used a buffered solution with a pH of 7.4. Both carboplatin formulations were added to the beads in a non-ionic form (C6H12N2O4Pt) without additional excipients. Yet, there was a difference in the proportion of mixing solution (sterile saline, NaCl 0.9%) and carboplatin solution (C6H12N2O4Pt diluted in sterile water at 10 mg/mL), both having a pH of 5 to 7.

No statistical difference was observed in this study regarding the peak carboplatin concentration achieved in the eluent by the 3.0- and 5.0-mm diameter calcium sulfate beads, however 5.0-mm diameter beads showed a slower elution rate. The first result is discordant from another study [10], that demonstrated a higher percentage release from 4.8-mm compared to 3.0-mm diameter carboplatin-impregnated beads. Smaller beads (3.0-mm) did also release faster than larger beads (4.8-mm) when loaded with vancomycin [12]; however, one should use caution when comparing different drugs. Still, it is interesting to consider that different bead sizes may achieve different clinical goals, and small beads could be favored for rapid carboplatin release while large beads may be chosen if a prolonged delivery is required.

A large variation was observed in the carboplatin elution rate and pattern observed with 5.0-mm diameter calcium sulfate beads. This could be related to some degree of inconsistency in their preparation, and the fact that some of the 5.0-mm diameter molds were more commonly incompletely filled with calcium sulfate paste towards the edges of the plate when using a half kit volume, creating beads of inconsistent shapes and sizes. This was less of an issue when filling the 3.0-mm diameter molds. Each kit technically allows for the preparation of 113 beads of 5.0-mm diameter, or 333 beads of 3.0-mm. Half kits of calcium sulfate powder volume were used in this study. However, the total volume of the mixture varied according to the amount of carboplatin powder or solution added, and the mold plating resulted in variable numbers of beads per flasks. Beads were not individually counted as the total amount of carboplatin remained equivalent per groups of similar carboplatin dose and certain beads were not fully formed. However, disparity in plating may have influenced carboplatin elution results.

A significantly higher percentage of incorporated carboplatin released and faster carboplatin elution was observed as the initial carboplatin dose increased, with an earlier and steeper decay after 13.5 hours for the highest dose. To our knowledge, although predictable, no previous report raised such a correlation between high incorporated dose and high percentage release with carboplatin-impregnated calcium sulfate beads. This pattern has been observed with other drugs [19]. The high concentration gradients created by high carboplatin loads into each calcium sulfate bead likely caused a faster and higher carboplatin release [2, 20].

The peak percentage of incorporated carboplatin released was lower than previously demonstrated [1, 2], using the compounded veterinary product (Wedgewood Pharmacy, Swedesboro, NJ, USA). However, it remains above the mean percentages of 27 to 48% achieved after 96 hours in another study which evaluated products commercialized on the human market (Osteoset resorbable mini bead kit, Wright Medical Technology Inc, Arlington, TN, USA; Stimulan Rapid Cure, Biocomposites Inc, Wilmington, NC, USA) [10]. In this study, we used a high volume of beads compared to previous reports [1, 2]. The saturation of carboplatin in the environment certainly shouldn’t have impacted the release as we followed the USP experimental guidelines for dissolution study to limit this risk. However, it is possible that the high volume of beads used in this study created an overcrowded environment that decreased the surface of contact with the eluent and thereby the elution of carboplatin.

We observed a decline in concentration of carboplatin over time after the maximum concentration was attained. We ruled out a dilution effect because the volume used to replace the aliquot of solvent withdrawn at each time point was insignificant and consistent with other study designs [10]. The decline is likely caused by degradation of the hydrophilic molecule in solution. One of the strengths of this study is that we measured intact carboplatin in our analysis in opposition to other previously cited studies that measured elemental platinum. If carboplatin degraded in solution, presence of platinum would not reflect the true amount of intact carboplatin eluted.

A limitation of our study is that carboplatin elution was measured in vitro only and the in vivo release in a tissue environment may differ according to locoregional factors [2, 21, 22]. Therefore it is difficult to predict the effective in vivo carboplatin concentration. Indeed, the only published recommendation corresponds to the systemic maximum tolerated dose (MTD) established at 300 mg carboplatin/m2 of body surface area in dogs (240 mg/m2 in cats), leading to a peak plasma concentration of 200 μM equivalent to 80 mg carboplatin/L 4 to 6 hours after IV injection [2325]. The desired local carboplatin dose may vary according to the microenvironment as well as the tumor type. In vitro studies have evaluated the susceptibility of diverse neoplastic cell lines to carboplatin [1317]. Considering the IC50 of common neoplastic cell lines, it appears that carboplatin concentrations achieved from the beads used in this study would inhibit all reported neoplastic cells. However, this is not a straight-forward extrapolation and the actual concentration in the tissues is influenced by the volume, the size of the beads, and the diffusion of carboplatin in the surrounding tissues. We recognize that the parallel drawn between carboplatin concentrations obtained in solution and the IC50 of different neoplastic cell lines is highly artificial, and difficult to interpret clinically. However, we find it useful to know that the concentrations obtained in solution after elution of a half kit are in similar reference ranges than the reported IC50 of classic neoplastic cell lines with which the kit could be used clinically. To our knowledge, no study has demonstrated a negative impact of a supra-MTD local dose of carboplatin. In vivo biocompatibility and safety studies are required to evaluate the systemic absorption of the drug, and rule out systemic toxicity.

The kit evaluated in this study has favorable advantages, including low expense, high versatility, wide availability, and biodegradable and biocompatible matrix. However, the powder formulation which has the potential to carry the highest carboplatin doses has to be purchased in a laboratory setting, restricting its use to compounding pharmacies. The liquid carboplatin formulation is the only accessible product to most veterinary clinics. Although it is proportionally associated with higher elution rate and concentration, the loaded dose is theoretically limited to 40 mg carboplatin per kit even if one were to maximize the carboplatin load and mix 4 mL of carboplatin solution total per kit (and discard the mixing solution) instead of 2 mL as we used in this study. Despite the lower carboplatin load obtained when using the liquid formulation, the resulting carboplatin concentration delivered may be sufficient to inhibit microscopic neoplastic cells in vivo, with low local and systemic toxicity.

Although common precautions should be used when handling chemotherapy drugs [2628], it does not prevent the beads to be prepared on demand in the operating setting. But if local chemotherapy requirements in a hospital limit handling of the chemotherapy drugs to a biosafety cabinet and hood, it will limit the kit’s use in the clinical setting. Such requirements may restrict its preparation to facilities equipped with a compounding pharmacy or biosafety assurances that meet the requirements of the local boards of pharmacy. Authorized pharmacies can prepare the beads under sterile conditions before being carried to the operating room. It is also possible to mix the beads with carboplatin beforehand and sterilize them prior to use by γ-irradiation or ethylene oxide [1, 29, 30].

Conclusions

This commercially-available kit of resorbable high purity alpha hemihydrate calcium sulfate beads (Kerrier Local Antibiotic Delivery, Palm Beach Garden, FL, USA) marketed for use in veterinary medicine and local delivery of antimicrobials could expand its use to include local tissue delivery of carboplatin. Doses ranging from 20 mg to 500 mg carboplatin per kit were tested, and would allow on demand preparation of carboplatin-impregnated calcium sulfate beads within 45 to 60 minutes of use with peak carboplatin delivery achieved within 48 hours in the local environment. The results reported here provide a foundation for future studies evaluating the in vivo efficacy of carboplatin treatment delivered with this product.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(XLSX)

S1 Statistics

(PDF)

S1 Statistics code

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Emily Griffith and James B. Robertson of the Office of Research at North Carolina State University for their expertise in performing the statistical analysis.

The authors thank Delta R. Dise, of the Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory at North Carolina State University for her expertise in performing the drug analysis, and Anne Crews, Laboratory Supervisor at the Adler Lab at North Carolina State University for her help with the elution study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The study was funded by North Carolina state University as part of Dr. Marine Traverson start-up funds. The authors thank Kerrier for providing the calcium sulfate hemihydrate kits used in this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Tulipan RJ, Phillips H, Garrett LD, Dirikolu L, Mitchell MA. Elution of platinum from carboplatin-impregnated calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads in vitro. Am J Vet Res. 2016;77(11):1252–7. 10.2460/ajvr.77.11.1252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tulipan RJ, Phillips H, Garrett LD, Dirikolu L, Mitchell MA. Characterization of long-term elution of platinum from carboplatin-impregnated calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads in vitro by two distinct sample collection methods. Am J Vet Res. 2017;78(5):618–23. 10.2460/ajvr.78.5.618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hewes CA, Sullins KE. Use of cisplatin-containing biodegradable beads for treatment of cutaneous neoplasia in equidae: 59 cases (2000–2004). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2006;229(10):1617–22. 10.2460/javma.229.10.1617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hess TA, Drinkhouse ME, Prey JD, Miller JM, Fettig AA, Carberry CA, et al. Analysis of platinum content in biodegradable carboplatin-impregnated beads and retrospective assessment of tolerability for intralesional use of the beads in dogs following excision of subcutaneous sarcomas: 29 cases (2011–2014). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2018;252(4):448–56. 10.2460/javma.252.4.448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bergman NS, Urie BK, Pardo AD, Newman RG. Evaluation of local toxic effects and outcomes for dogs undergoing marginal tumor excision with intralesional cisplatin-impregnated bead placement for treatment of soft tissue sarcomas: 62 cases (2009–2012). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 2016;248(10):1148–56. 10.2460/javma.248.10.1148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Phillips H, Maxwell EA, Schaeffer DJ, Fan TM. Simulation of spatial diffusion of platinum from carboplatin-impregnated calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads by use of an agarose gelatin tissue phantom. Am J Vet Res. 2018;79(6):592–9. 10.2460/ajvr.79.6.592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Johnson JG 3rd, Naples LM, Chu C, Kinsel MJ, Flower JE, Van Bonn WG. Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Panther Chameleon (Furcifer Pardalis) and Treatment with Carboplatin Implantable Beads. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2016;47(3):931–4. 10.1638/2015-0230.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Maxwell EA, Phillips H, Clark-Price SC, Vieson MD, Selmic LE, Schaeffer DJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of platinum and safety evaluation of carboplatin-impregnated calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads after implantation in healthy cats. Veterinary surgery. 2020;49(4):748–57. 10.1111/vsu.13372 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dorbandt DM, Lundberg AP, Roady PJ, Huey JA, Phillips H, Hamor RE. Surgical excision of a feline orbital lacrimal gland adenocarcinoma with adjunctive cryotherapy and carboplatin-impregnated bead implantation. Vet Ophthalmol. 2018;21(4):419–25. 10.1111/vop.12501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Risselada M, Marcellin-Little DJ, Messenger KM, Griffith E, Davidson GS, Papich MG. Assessment of in vitro release of carboplatin from six carrier media. Am J Vet Res. 2016;77(12):1381–6. 10.2460/ajvr.77.12.1381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Boothe DM. Veterinary compounding in small animals: a clinical pharmacologist's perspective. The Veterinary clinics of North America Small animal practice. 2006;36(5):1129–73, viii. 10.1016/j.cvsm.2006.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roberts R, McConoughey SJ, Calhoun JH. Size and composition of synthetic calcium sulfate beads influence dissolution and elution rates in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(4):667–73. 10.1002/jbm.b.33045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Simon D, Knebel JW, Baumgartner W, Aufderheide M, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Nolte I. In vitro efficacy of chemotherapeutics as determined by 50% inhibitory concentrations in cell cultures of mammary gland tumors obtained from dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2001;62(11):1825–30. 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Holmes KE, Thompson V, Piskun CM, Kohnken RA, Huelsmeyer MK, Fan TM, et al. Canine osteosarcoma cell lines from patients with differing serum alkaline phosphatase concentrations display no behavioural differences in vitro. Veterinary and comparative oncology. 2015;13(3):166–75. 10.1111/vco.12031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Knapp DW, Chan TC, Kuczek T, Reagan WJ, Park B. Evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs against canine tumor cells. Am J Vet Res. 1995;56(6):801–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maxwell EA, Phillips H, Schaeffer DJ, Fan TM. In vitro chemosensitivity of feline injection site-associated sarcoma cell lines to carboplatin. Veterinary surgery. 2018;47(2):219–26. 10.1111/vsu.12709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.de Brito Galvao JF, Kisseberth WC, Murahari S, Sutayatram S, Chew DJ, Inpanbutr N. Effects of gemcitabine and gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin on five canine transitional cell carcinoma cell lines. Am J Vet Res. 2012;73(8):1262–72. 10.2460/ajvr.73.8.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary (USP 43-NF 38). In: Convention USP, editor. Rockville, MD2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wichelhaus TA, Dingeldein E, Rauschmann M, Kluge S, Dieterich R, Schafer V, et al. Elution characteristics of vancomycin, teicoplanin, gentamicin and clindamycin from calcium sulphate beads. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;48(1):117–9. 10.1093/jac/48.1.117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ye F, Larsen SW, Yaghmur A, Jensen H, Larsen C, Ostergaard J. Drug release into hydrogel-based subcutaneous surrogates studied by UV imaging. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012;71:27–34. 10.1016/j.jpba.2012.07.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Aukland K, Reed RK. Interstitial-lymphatic mechanisms in the control of extracellular fluid volume. Physiol Rev. 1993;73(1):1–78. 10.1152/physrev.1993.73.1.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wiig H, Swartz MA. Interstitial fluid and lymph formation and transport: physiological regulation and roles in inflammation and cancer. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(3):1005–60. 10.1152/physrev.00037.2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Page RL, McEntee MC, George SL, Williams PL, Heidner GL, Novotney CA, et al. Pharmacokinetic and phase I evaluation of carboplatin in dogs. Journal of veterinary internal medicine. 1993;7(4):235–40. 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1993.tb01013.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gaver RC, George AM, Duncan GF, Morris AD, Deeb G, Faulkner HC, et al. The disposition of carboplatin in the beagle dog. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1988;21(3):197–202. 10.1007/BF00262769 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bailey DB, Rassnick KM, Dykes NL, Pendyala L. Phase I evaluation of carboplatin by use of a dosing strategy based on a targeted area under the platinum concentration-versus-time curve and individual glomerular filtration rate in cats with tumors. Am J Vet Res. 2009;70(6):770–6. 10.2460/ajvr.70.6.770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services PHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Alert: Preventing occupational exposures to antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs in healthcare settings. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. ASHP guidelines on handling hazardous drugs. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2006;63:1172–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Polovich M, White JM, Kelleher LO. Chemotherapy and biotherapy guidelines and recommendations for practice. 2nd ed Pittsburgh, PA: Oncology Nursing Society; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sanicola SM, Albert SF. The in vitro elution characteristics of vancomycin and tobramycin from calcium sulfate beads. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44(2):121–4. 10.1053/j.jfas.2005.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Santschi EM, McGarvey L. In vitro elution of gentamicin from Plaster of Paris beads. Veterinary surgery. 2003;32(2):128–33. 10.1053/jvet.2003.50010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Simon Clegg

12 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-21335

Evaluation of bioabsorbable calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads for local delivery of carboplatin

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Traverson,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The manuscript was reviewed by three experts in the field, and they have all commended the article, but made some suggestions for minor modifications.

I therefore invite you to make the minor changes to the manuscript and resubmit it.

If you could write a response to reviewers that will aid in review upon resubmission.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 26 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

I wish you the best of luck with your revisions.

Hope you are keeping safe and well in these difficult times.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Simon Clegg, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the Methods section, please provide the product number and any lot numbers of the carboplatin purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Accord Healthcare for your study.

3. In the Methods section, please provide the specific name, product number and any lot numbers of the hemihydrate calcium sulfate bead kit purchased from (Kerrier Local Antibiotic Delivery for your study.

4. To comply with PLOS ONE submission guidelines, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding your statistical analyses. For more information on PLOS ONE's expectations for statistical reporting, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines.#loc-statistical-reporting.

5. Thank you for stating the following in the Financial Disclosure section:

"The study was funded by North Carolina state University as part of Dr. Marine Traverson start-up funds.

The authors thank Kerrier for providing the calcium sulfate hemihydrate kits used in this study.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

We note that you received funding from a commercial source: Kerrier.

Please provide an amended Competing Interests Statement that explicitly states this commercial funder, along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, marketed products, etc.

Within this Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your amended Competing Interests Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: very nice, highly interesting manuscript. Thank you for your work in this direction and field.

Minor thing: Page 8, line 156 the word "to" is missing

"The desired local carboplatin dose may vary according to the microenvironment as well as the tumor type." ==> In my opinion a graphic or at least a table showing desired doses as well as results to allow for an easier comparison would help.

You describe a loss of 5 ml or 10 ml PBS buffer solution - how is this accounted for? Do you see a specific reason?

Where do you describe the disadvantages of too high local concentrations or carboplatine?

Just an idea - have you read this: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27067337/ ?

Reviewer #2: The authors have carried out the work on “Evaluation of bioabsorbable calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads for local delivery of carboplatin”

The work is mainly dealt on the in vitro elution of drug carboplatin. I have no specific concern on the article except in future experiment; the elution property of drug may be mimiced at in vivo model to justify in real situation. Reference 8 of the manuscript is to be checked.

Reviewer #3: Comments: Overall, the manuscript is well organized with a comprehensive presentation of carboplatin release from the beads. Below the are the comments.

General: For more clarity, a suggestion to revise the text, wherever applicable as follows “carboplatin, an anti-tumor agent is being investigated using these beads, which are generally used for the local delivery of anti-microbial agents”.

Introduction:

Line number: 45: What is the route of administration and what is the minimal systemic exposure. Please mention.

Materials and Methods:

Line number- 103: I understand the benefits of methylene blue, but why and how it can be compared with carboplatin release (3 days). Are they structurally relevant?

Line number 107: Please mention any literature justification for the selection of 4 doses for powder and 1 liquid formulation dose.

Line number 114: Please revise the text /typo “allowed to set for 60 min in the template”?

Line number 115: Please make it clear, 200ml pbs is added to the flask. Where are the beads, are they transferred to the flask?

Statistical analysis:

Line number 158: Delete the duplicate word “for each”

Line number 160- Grammar “was designed”

Line number 172- please align these parameters “fixed effects, dose, bead size and time” with line number 162

Results:

Line number 187- How many beads were there in each flask? And What could be the reason for volume reduction from 200ml to 190 and 195ml?

Line number 235- Carboplatin impregnated beads are placed in PBS and the eluted drug concentration is determined using HPLC which is compared with the IC50 values of carboplatin in different cell lines. It is not clearly written how this comparison is useful/hopeful for any further investigations (safety/cytotoxicity).

Discussion:

Line number 265 – “reason cannot be determined for the difference between powder and liquid carboplatin formulations behavior”. Any opinion why / which factors is influence this due to which further studies are required.

Table: What is the dilution factor?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241718.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


5 Oct 2020

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Formatting of affiliation was modified (single space). We do not see any other style requirement mismatch; please indicate specifically as needed.

2. In the Methods section, please provide the product number and any lot numbers of the carboplatin purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Accord Healthcare for your study.

Added lines 109-110 (USP). Unfortunately, the Carboplatin from Accord Healthcare was provided by the hospital pharmacy, and we do not have the product number.

3. In the Methods section, please provide the specific name, product number and any lot numbers of the hemihydrate calcium sulfate bead kit purchased from (Kerrier Local Antibiotic Delivery for your study.

Added line 93-94.

4. To comply with PLOS ONE submission guidelines, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding your statistical analyses. For more information on PLOS ONE's expectations for statistical reporting, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines.#loc-statistical-reporting.

Statistical analysis software was reported line 164. Additional information regarding the statistical methods and results were reported lines 167-169, and 248-254.

5. Thank you for stating the following in the Financial Disclosure section:

"The study was funded by North Carolina state University as part of Dr. Marine Traverson start-up funds.

The authors thank Kerrier for providing the calcium sulfate hemihydrate kits used in this study.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

We note that you received funding from a commercial source: Kerrier.

Please provide an amended Competing Interests Statement that explicitly states this commercial funder, along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, marketed products, etc.

Within this Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your amended Competing Interests Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Modified accordingly.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: very nice, highly interesting manuscript. Thank you for your work in this direction and field.

Minor thing: Page 8, line 156 the word "to" is missing

Line 165: Corrected.

"The desired local carboplatin dose may vary according to the microenvironment as well as the tumor type." ==> In my opinion a graphic or at least a table showing desired doses as well as results to allow for an easier comparison would help.

Thank you for your suggestion. A graphic comparing carboplatin concentration achieved in PBS after elution from the beads with IC50 of different neoplastic cell lines was added lines 266-269.

You describe a loss of 5 ml or 10 ml PBS buffer solution - how is this accounted for? Do you see a specific reason?

Changes were most likely related to evaporation, despite the fact that each flask was covered with an aluminum foil to prevent evaporative losses. The detail of the calculation has been added lines 202-208.

Where do you describe the disadvantages of too high local concentrations or carboplatin?

Just an idea - have you read this: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27067337/ ?

To our knowledge, there is no description of the concept of “too high local concentrations”. As long as systemic absorption is limited, the use of supra-IC50 doses of carboplatin should not have any negative impact on the patient. Comment added lines 353-360.

Reviewer #2: The authors have carried out the work on “Evaluation of bioabsorbable calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads for local delivery of carboplatin”

The work is mainly dealt on the in vitro elution of drug carboplatin. I have no specific concern on the article except in future experiment; the elution property of drug may be mimicked at in vivo model to justify in real situation. Reference 8 of the manuscript is to be checked.

Thank you for this suggestion. Updated reference. Line 433-435.

Reviewer #3: Comments: Overall, the manuscript is well organized with a comprehensive presentation of carboplatin release from the beads. Below the are the comments.

General: For more clarity, a suggestion to revise the text, wherever applicable as follows “carboplatin, an anti-tumor agent is being investigated using these beads, which are generally used for the local delivery of anti-microbial agents”.

Modifications made in lines 20-21, 73-74, 273.

Introduction:

Line number: 45: What is the route of administration and what is the minimal systemic exposure. Please mention.

Thank you for your comment. The route of administration is implanted during surgery, as mentioned in the introduction. Unfortunately, we do not know what the systemic exposure is at this time because we have not implanted these beads into animals and measured the plasma concentrations. Therefore, we do not know the minimal systemic exposure; perhaps this could be done in future studies.

Materials and Methods:

Line number- 103: I understand the benefits of methylene blue, but why and how it can be compared with carboplatin release (3 days). Are they structurally relevant?

Thank you for your comment. Methylene blue is a very stable compound, and it is stable in solution. It cannot be directly compared to carboplatin, because they are different chemicals. However, we used it as a chemical marker because it is easy to measure as a dye. It provided preliminary evidence of the rate of release.

Line number 107: Please mention any literature justification for the selection of 4 doses for powder and 1 liquid formulation dose.

To our knowledge, there is no particular literature reference or guidelines describing the local concentration of carboplatin required. Therefore, the dose was selected arbitrarily and taking into account the amount of powder and liquid that could safely be added to the calcium sulfate powder without compromising the production of the beads. Comment added Line 111-115.

Line number 114: Please revise the text /typo “allowed to set for 60 min in the template”?

Line 120: Corrected.

Line number 115: Please make it clear, 200ml pbs is added to the flask. Where are the beads, are they transferred to the flask?

Line 128: Comment added. The beads were stored in the flasks overnight, and PBS added into the flasks containing the beads at time 0.

Statistical analysis:

Line number 158: Delete the duplicate word “for each”

Deleted.

Line number 160- Grammar “was designed”

Line 170: Corrected.

Line number 172- please align these parameters “fixed effects, dose, bead size and time” with line number 162

Line 183-184: Adjusted.

Results:

Line number 187- How many beads were there in each flask? And What could be the reason for volume reduction from 200ml to 190 and 195ml?

Changes were most likely related to evaporation, despite the fact that each flask was covered with an aluminum foil to prevent evaporative losses. The detail of the calculation has been added lines 202-208.

Number of beads in each flask varied based on the plating technique and amount of carboplatin (powder or solution) added to the mixture. The fact that some of the beads were not fully formed and the amount of bead per flasks prevented counting. A comment was added in discussion (lines 309-315).

Line number 235- Carboplatin impregnated beads are placed in PBS and the eluted drug concentration is determined using HPLC which is compared with the IC50 values of carboplatin in different cell lines. It is not clearly written how this comparison is useful/hopeful for any further investigations (safety/cytotoxicity).

This parallel between carboplatin concentrations obtained in solution and the IC50 of different neoplastic cell lines is certainly highly artificial, and difficult to interpret clinically as the required local carboplatin dose is unknown and may vary according to multiple locoregional factors. However, we felt that it would be useful to ensure that the concentrations obtained in solution after elution of a half kit would at least find themselves in similar reference range than the reported IC50 of classic neoplastic cell lines with which the kit could be used clinically. Comment added line 353-360.

Discussion:

Line number 265 – “reason cannot be determined for the difference between powder and liquid carboplatin formulations behavior”. Any opinion why / which factors is influence this due to which further studies are required.

We are not sure how to explain these differences between the powder and the liquid formulation. It could be due to factors that are unknown. At this time, all we can say is that “the reason for these differences are undetermined without further undue study” (added lines 289-290). Such studies may include for example using the powder carboplatin and mixing it into the solution prior to preparation of the beads. This may not be as relevant as the carboplatin powder itself was mixed with sterile saline after addition to the calcium sulfate powder in our study. It is difficult to understand why such a difference was noted.

Table: What is the dilution factor?

The dilution factor is 0 (no dilution). Added Lines 224 and 242.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PLOS One Review final comment revision.docx

Decision Letter 1

Simon Clegg

20 Oct 2020

Evaluation of bioabsorbable calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads for local delivery of carboplatin

PONE-D-20-21335R1

Dear Dr. Traverson,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Simon Clegg, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

Many thanks for resubmitting your manuscript to PLOS One

As you have addressed all comments and the manuscript reads well, I have recommended it for publication

You should hear from the Editorial Office soon

It was a pleasure working with you and I wish you all the best for your future research

Hope you are keeping safe and well in these difficult times

Thanks

Simon

Acceptance letter

Simon Clegg

27 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-21335R1

Evaluation of bioabsorbable calcium sulfate hemihydrate beads for local delivery of carboplatin

Dear Dr. Traverson:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Simon Clegg

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data

    (XLSX)

    S1 Statistics

    (PDF)

    S1 Statistics code

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLOS One Review final comment revision.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES