Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics and Molecular Biology logoLink to Genetics and Molecular Biology
. 2020 Nov 6;43(4):e20190418. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2019-0418

Brazilian Kayabi Indian accessions of peanut, Arachis hypogaea (Fabales, Fabaceae): origin, diversity and evolution

Eliza Fabricio de Melo Bellard do Nascimento 1,2, Soraya Cristina de Macedo Leal-Bertioli 3, David John Bertioli 3, Carolina Chavarro 3, Fábio Oliveira Freitas 2, Márcio de Carvalho Moretzsohn 2, Patricia Messenberg Guimarães 2, José Francisco Montenegro Valls 2, Ana Claudia Guerra de Araujo 2
PMCID: PMC7644258  PMID: 33174976

Abstract

Peanut is a crop of the Kayabi tribe, inhabiting the Xingu Indigenous Park, Brazil. Morphological analysis of Xingu accessions showed variation exceeding that described for cultivated peanuts. This raised questions as to the origin of the Xingu accessions: are they derived from different species, or is their diversity a result of different evolutionary and selection processes? To answer these questions, cytogenetic and genotyping analyses were conducted. The karyotypes of Xingu accessions analyzed are very similar to each other, to an A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata accession and to the wild allotetraploid A. monticola. The accessions share the number and general morphology of the chromosomes; DAPI+ bands; 5S and 45S rDNA loci distribution and a high genomic affinity with A. duranensis and A. ipaënsis genomic probes. However, the number of CMA3 + bands differs from those determined for A. hypogaea and A. monticola, which are also different from each other. SNP genotyping grouped all Arachis allotetraploids into four taxonomic groups: Xingu accessions were closer to A. monticola and A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea. Our data suggests that the morphological diversity within these accessions is not associated with a different origin and can be attributed to morphological plasticity and different selection by the Indian tribes.

Keywords: Chromosome, in situ hybridization, morphological plasticity, SNPs, Xingu Indigenous Park

Introduction

Cultivated peanut, Arachis hypogaea (Fabales, Fabaceae) is a recent allotetraploid, with an origin estimated between 3,500 and 9,400 years ago (Simpson et al., 2001; Bertioli et al., 2016, 2019). The vast archaeological findings dating to 3,700 years ago certify its relevance in the human diet since the distant past (Pickersgill and Heiser, 1977). It is a South American native oil legume, cultivated worldwide, including in Brazil by local indigenous populations.

The most probable center of origin of the genus Arachis is located in central region of Brazil (Valls, 2000). The genus Arachis displays a peculiarity that defines all the species: the underground development of seeds, known as geocarpy (Smith, 1950; Krapovickas and Gregory, 1994). The genus comprises mostly wild diploid species (2n = 2x = 20), including the progenitor species of the peanut, A. duranensis (A genome) and A. ipaënsis (B genome). The section Arachis, to which A. hypogaea belongs, has another allotetraploid species, the wild A. monticola (Krapovickas and Gregory, 1994; Valls et al., 2013), with A and B subgenomes, from the same progenitors of peanut (Seijo et al., 2004, 2007; Moretzsohn et al., 2013; Bertioli et al., 2016, 2019). Besides the A and B genomes, section Arachis comprises species with D, F, K and G genomes, separated based on morphological, cytological aspects, FISH mapping of rDNA loci and heterochromatin distribution (Stalker, 1991; Robledo and Seijo, 2008, 2010; Silvestri et al., 2015).

The cultivated peanut, being an allotetraploid, is not easily crossable to its wild diploid relatives. This has prevented gene flow between the cultigen and its wild diploid relatives and restricted its genetic variability (Kochert et al., 1991, 1996; Stalker and Simpson, 1995; Moretzsohn et al., 2004; Bertioli et al., 2016, 2019). However, the variability in morphological and agronomical aspects is surprisingly high; two subspecies are recognized, hypogaea and fastigiata, divided into a total of six botanical varieties (Krapovickas and Gregory, 1994). The various processes of selection under cultivation produced variation, bushy and erect growth habits, variable numbers of seeds per pod, size and color of seeds, among others (Krapovickas and Gregory, 1994).

Peanuts are the fifth most produced oilseed in the world (USDA-FAS, 2019). In Brazil, commercial cultivation is mostly concentrated in the state of Sao Paulo, but importantly, it is also grown in small-scale for subsistence, including by some Brazilian indigenous tribes. One major ethnic group maintaining and using peanut accessions is the Kayabi tribe, inhabiting the Xingu Indigenous Park, situated at the northeast area of Mato Grosso Brazilian state. They have inhabited this region since the early sixties, when they were moved there from further west, near Bolivia and Peru (Novaes, 1985).

The Kayabi people have a complex system of agriculture that includes peanut as one of the main sources of food (Freitas et al., 2007). As such, they are important caretakers of their accessions and guardians of distinct genetic resources. Because of this, scientific expeditions have been organized to identify and collect the local peanut accessions, as well as to learn about their agriculture practices (Freitas et al., 2007).

The characterization of these accessions from Xingu Indigenous Park and surrounding areas using taxonomic descriptors has shown morphological characteristics that surpassed the variation described for the six botanical varieties of A. hypogaea, as observed in the shape, size, texture and color of the pods and seeds (Suassuna et al., 2016). These differences raised questions about the possible contribution of progenitor species other than A. duranensis and A. ipaënsis in the origin of some Xingu accessions. In fact, it is reasonable to consider the possible participation of other diploid Arachis species in the origin of the accessions, due to the occurrence in the region of the Central Brazil of wild species that share some aspects of the morphology of the pods with the Xingu accessions, specially A. stenosperma, which is also cultivated by indigenous tribes in Brazil that has pods with a thin smooth shell, and A. magna, very closely related to A. ipaënsis, with pods showing a moderate longitudinal prominence (Simpson et al., 2001; Freitas et al., 2007; Koppolu et al., 2010; Moretzsohn et al., 2013). However, an alternative possibility is that the origin of the Xingu Park accessions is the same as A. hypogaea and A. monticola, and their isolation, selection and genetic recombination has produced morphological features not present in accessions from other areas.

Aiming to better characterize the accessions from Xingu Park, herein is presented a cytogenetic and SNP genotyping study of some A. hypogaea types from Xingu, and compared to peanut cultivars, A. monticola and four wild diploid species.

Material and Methods

Plant material

Three accessions of A. hypogaea (AB genome) collected at the Kayabi indigenous villages Guarujá and Ilha Grande, in the Xingu Indigenous Park (Mato Grosso, Brazil), accessions Of 115, Of 120 and Of 126; A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata var. fastigiata ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ (AB genome) and the wild allotetraploid A. monticola V 14165 (AB genome) were used for cytogenetic analysis. The diploid species, A. duranensis V 14167 (A genome), A. stenosperma V 10309 (A genome), A. ipaënsis K 30076 (B genome) and A. magna K 30097 (B genome) were used in the cytogenetic analysis as source of genomic DNA for genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) probes. For the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping, five Xingu Park accessions, 22 accessions of A. hypogaea, and five of A. monticola were used (Table 1). All seeds were obtained from the Active Germplasm Bank of Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (Cenargen, Brasília, Brazil).

Table 1. Genotypes of Arachis used for cytogenetic and genotyping analysis, indicating the state, number of chromosomes, genomic formula and identification.

Genotypes State 2n Genomic formula Identification
A. hypogaea “Xingu/Nambikwara” intermediate Cultivated by indians 40 AABB Of 115*
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated by indians 40 AABB Of 120*
A. hypogaea type “Xingu” Cultivated by indians 40 AABB Of 122
A. hypogaea type “Xingu” Cultivated by indians 40 AABB Of 126*
A. hypogaea “Nambikwara” type Cultivated by indians 40 AABB Of 128
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB Tifguard
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB Runner IAC 886
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB Tifrunner
A. hypogaeasubsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB IAC OL4
A. hypogaeasubsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB Tif 5-646-10
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB Tif 13-1014
A. hypogaeasubsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB TifGp-2
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB FloRun 107
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB FloRun 157
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB FloRun 331
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB Florida Fancy
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB Florida-EP 113
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB GA-06G
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB GA-09B
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB GA-12Y
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB TUFRunner 511
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB TUFRunner 297
A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Cultivated 40 AABB TUFRunner 727
A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata Waldron var. fastigiata Cultivated 40 AABB IAC Tatu-ST*
A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata var. fastigiata Cultivated 40 AABB BR1
A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata var. vulgaris C. Harz Cultivated 40 AABB Senegal 55-437
A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata var. vulgaris Cultivated 40 AABB Fleur 11
A. monticola Krapov. & Rigoni Wild 40 AABB V 14165*
A. monticola Wild 40 AABB Sc 21768
A. monticola Wild 40 AABB Sc 21769
A. monticola Wild 40 AABB K 30062
A. monticola Wild 40 AABB K 30063
A. monticola Wild 40 AABB Ba 7264
A. duranensis Krapov. & W.C. Greg. Wild 20 AA V 14167*
A. stenosperma Krapov. & W.C. Greg. Wild 20 AA V 10309*
A. ipaënsis Krapov. & W.C. Greg. Wild 20 BB K 30076*
A. magna Krapov., W.C. Greg. & C.E. Simpson Wild 20 BB K 30097*
Open in a new tab
*

Accessions cytogenetically analyzed.

Metaphase chromosomes

Seeds were germinated for 5 days at 25 °C, then plantlets were transferred to pots with soil and maintained in an open plan greenhouse at Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Brasília, DF, Brazil. After four weeks, root tips (5-10 mm long) were isolated from five plants, for each genotype and treated with 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline for 3 h at room temperature (Fernández and Krapovickas, 1994). Samples were incubated in a fixative solution containing absolute ethanol: glacial acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 12 h at 4 °C. Somatic chromosome spreads were prepared according to Schwarzacher and Heslop-Harrison (2000). Meristems were digested in 10 mM citrate buffer containing 2% cellulase (from Trichoderma viridae; Onozuka R-10 Serva) and 20% pectinase (from Aspergillus niger, Sigma) for 2 h at 37 °C. Chromosomes of each root were spread in a drop of acetic acid 45% on a slide and mounted with coverslip. Spread was obtained under pressure and the best slides were selected using the phase contrast in the AxiosKop microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Those slides containing more than ten metaphases nicely spread and clean were chosen and the coverslips removed using the difference of temperature between slide and coverslip after submersion of the slide in liquid nitrogen. Slides were air-dried for 24h and kept at −20°C until use.

Heterochromatic banding

CMA 3 / DAPI banding

In order to localize GC and AT-rich heterochromatin, CMA3/DAPI banding was conducted in all genotypes following Schweizer and Ambros (1994). Chromosome spreads were treated with the fluorophore chromomycin A3 (CMA3, 0,5 mg/ml) for 1 h at room temperature, posteriorly with 4’, 6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 2 μg/ml) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Slides were mounted with glycerol/McIlvaine buffer. Analysis were conducted in the epifluorescent Zeiss AxioPhot photomicroscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Images were captured using Zeiss AxioCam MRc digital camera (Zeiss Light Microscopy, Göttingen, Germany) and AxioVision Rel. 4.8 software and further processed using the Adobe Photoshop CS software.

Probes for in situ hybridization

In order to obtain the probes for GISH, genomic DNA (1 μg) was isolated from young leaflets of A. duranensis, A. stenosperma, A. ipaënsis and A. magna (Table 1), according to one CTAB protocol (Doyle and Doyle, 1987). DNA was purified, then labeled with either, digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Roche Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH) or Cy3-dUTP (Roche Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH) by Nick Translation kit (Roche Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH). No previous fragmentation of DNA sequences was necessary since this kit contains DNase. For probes to be used in fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), clones containing the sequences corresponding to the 5S ribosomal DNA of Lotus japonicus (Pedrosa et al., 2002) and 18S-5.8S-25S of Arabidopsis thaliana (Wanzenböck et al., 1997) were used. The rDNA was isolated with the Illustra plasmid Prep Midi Flow kit (GE Heltcare) and rDNA sequences were labeled by Nick translation, using the same kit described for genomic probes.

In situ hybridization

The in situ hybridization experiments were performed as described by Schwarzacher and Heslop-Harrison (2000). The hybridization steps and conditions were similar for GISH and FISH. Metaphase spreads were pre-treated with RNase A (10 mg/ml) for 2 h at 37 °C, followed by treatment with pepsin (10 mg/ml) for 15 min at 37 °C. Slides were incubated in a fixative solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. Double GISH used simultaneously, both genomic probes, each one from a different different diploid species (approx. 50 ng of each probe/slide). FISH also used both ribosomal probes simultaneously, 5S and 45S rDNA. Hybridizations were performed for 12 h at 37 °C, followed by 73% stringent washes, using saline citrate buffer (SSC) 2X. Loci obtained by hybridization with the probe labeled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP were immunocytochemically detected, using the antibody anti-digoxigenin conjugated to fluorescein (Roche Diagnostics), while loci obtained with Cy3-dUTP probes were detected by direct observation in the epifluorescence microscope. Slides were counterstained with DAPI before observation in the Zeiss AxioPhot.

SNP genotyping and data analysis

SNP genotyping was performed to analyze the genetic relationships of 32 accessions including the Xingu accessions, representatives of the two subspecies of A. hypogaea and A. monticola (Table 1).

Genotyping was done using the Axiom_Arachis2 48K array (Korani et al., 2019). Data were analyzed using Axiom Analysis Suite v.1.1.0.616 (Applied Biosystems, USA) and filtered by quality using the QC call rate > 90%. The genotyping information was filtered, allowing a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.05 and 20% missing calls. Markers showing inconsistent calls from duplicates of the same sample were discarded. Data output was visualized in Microsoft Excel. Genetic distances were obtained by 1-IBS (identity by state) in pairwise comparisons of the 32 accessions and an UPGMA tree was constructed using Tassel 5 (Bradbury et al., 2007). The tree was plotted using FigTree software v.1.4.4.

Additionally, 448 A. stenosperma-specific SNPs were identified and compared to the genotypes of Xingu samples and two subspecies of A. hypogaea. Six accessions of A. stenosperma were included in this analysis: V 7762, V 10309, V 13796, V 13840, V 13844, and HLK 410.

Results

The choice of the Xingu accessions analyzed here considered first the larger morphological differences and genetic distances based on Freitas et al. (2007), followed by current germination and growth success. Differences in the morphology focused on shape, size, texture and color of the pods and seeds. Xingu/Nambikwara Of 115 (Figure 1A) is characterized by straight pods, prominent longitudinal and thick ridges and hard fruit shell, comprising some characteristics in between the other two types, the Nambikwara and Xingu. Arachis hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Of 120 (Figure 1B) is considered the most primitive peanut cultivated by the Kayabi tribes, with some characteristics comparable to those of A. monticola, but much larger seeds. The third one, A. hypogaea Xingu type Of 126 (Figure 1C) has a thin and smooth fruit shell and an easily broken constriction in the middle of the pod. For comparison, the seeds of the Xingu accessions, cultivated peanut (A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’) (Figure 1D) and A. monticola (Figure 1E) are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Pods and seeds of the Arachis genotypes cytogenetically analyzed showing differences in size, color and middle constriction. A) A. hypogaea Xingu/Nambikwara Of 115; B) A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea Of 120; C) A. hypogaea “Xingu” type Of 126; D) A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata var. fastigiata ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ and E) A. monticola V 14165.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Chromosome morphology

The chromosomes of the three accessions from Xingu Park were similar to each other, as shown by Of 126 as the representative of the three accessions (Figure 2A), and to cultivar ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ (Figure 2B) and A. monticola (Figure 2C), comprising 36 metacentric and four submetacentric chromosomes. One pair of chromosomes showed a secondary constriction, with a satellite segment, usually observed near to the proximal segment of the long arm of the chromosome, assigned as A10, based on the corresponding chromosomes 10 of the diploid progenitor A. duranensis, A. hypogaea and A. monticola (Seijo et al., 2004). The small pair ‘A’, previously designated as chromosome 9 in A. duranensis was easily identified in all Xingu accessions due to the presence of the DAPI+ bands on the centromeres of these chromosomes, characteristic by the high condensation level of the heterochromatin.

Figure 2. Metaphase chromosomes after DAPI counterstaining (bright white) in A) Xingu type of 126, representing similar results for the three Xingu accessions; B) A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ and C) A. monticola V 14165. Ten pairs of chromosomes show DAPI+ bands on centromeric region of A subgenome (red arrows), while the other 10 pairs, corresponding to the chromosomes of the B subgenome, lack DAPI+ bands (green arrows). A9: small pair “A”. A10 with secondary constriction, short arm and proximal segment of the long arm (*) and satellite is (°). Bar: 5μm.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Distribution of heterochromatic banding

The Xingu accessions showed evident DAPI+ bands on the centromere region of ten pairs of chromosomes (A subgenome), corroborating the richness of repetitive A T in the DNA sequences of centromeres. These bands could not be detected on centromeres or other genome regions in the other ten pairs (B subgenome) (Figure 2A). DAPI+ banding pattern on the centromeres of chromosomes of the A subgenome was similar among the Xingu accessions, A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ and A. monticola (Figures 2B and C).

The Xingu accessions had two pairs of chromosomes displaying CMA3 + bands, situated on the proximal regions of the chromosomes A10 and B10 (Figures 3A, B) and representing the sum of CMA3 + bands observed in A. duranensis and A. ipaënsis (Nascimento et al., 2018). These bands differed from those present in the other tetraploids studied. In A. hypogaea 'IAC Tatu-ST’, besides the bands on chromosomes A10 and B10, there were bands most likely in A2, B3 and B7 (Figures 3C, D), while in A. monticola, CMA3 + bands were located only on chromosomes A2 and A10 (Figures 3E, F).

Figure 3. Chromosomes showing CMA3 + bands (arrows) on the proximal region of the chromosomes (A, C, E). Overlap of CMA3 (yellow) and DAPI (blue) (B, D, F). A, B Xingu type Of 126, representing the similar results of all three Xingu accessions; C, D A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ and E, F) A. monticola V 14165. A10: short arm and proximal segments of the long arm (*) and satellite (°). Bar: 5μm.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Affinity of diploid genomes detected by GISH

Double GISH in chromosomes of the three Xingu accessions, using simultaneously the genomic probes from A. duranensis and A. ipaënsis (Figure S1 (241.4KB, pdf) ) showed that each probe hybridized preferentially, with chromosomes of the corresponding subgenome, i.e., A. duranensis probe hybridized strongly and extensively with chromosomes of the A subgenome, whilst the A. ipaënsis probe hybridized clearly with chromosomes of the B subgenome (Figure 4A-C).

Figure 4. GISH using simultaneously the genomic probes from different diploid species in Xingu accessions. A, D) Xingu/Nambikwara Of 115; B, E) Of 120 and C, F) Xingu type Of 126. Hybridization with A. duranensis (red) and A. ipaënsis (green) probes (A, B, C), followed by DAPI counterstaining (blue), including the overlap of signals (greenish) of both probes. More discrete signals after hybridization with the probes from A. stenosperma (red) and signals almost absent in A. magna (green) (D, E, F). A10 with secondary constriction, short arm and proximal segment of the long arm (*) and satellite (°). Bar: 5μm.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Signals after hybridization (GISH) were evident in all chromosomes, of both subgenomes, for the three Xingu accessions analyzed. Except for A9, short arm and proximal segment of the long arm of A10, that together with the centromeres of the chromosomes of the A subgenome and terminal regions of all chromosomes showed weak hybridization (Figures 4A-C). Furthermore, overlapping of hybridization signals, i.e., both probes hybridizing to the same DNA region was observed in most of the chromosomes, for both subgenomes, in all accessions.

The DNA from A. stenosperma (A genome) and A. magna (B genome) were also used as genomic probes for GISH (Figure S2 (236KB, pdf) ) to investigate the possible contribution of these genomes, as donors for Xingu subgenomes. After hybridization with A. stenosperma probe, signals on Xingu accessions were mostly observed on chromosomes of the A subgenome, while few signals generated by hybridization with A. magna probe were dispersed on chromosomes of B subgenome, in all accessions (Figures 4D-F).

Most importantly, in the chromosomes of the Xingu accessions, hybridization with A. duranensis probe was stronger and uniform when compared to A. stenosperma probe. Similarly, hybridization with the A. ipaënsis probe was stronger and uniform than that with A. magna probe.

Distribution of rDNA loci detected by FISH

The number, size and position of the 5S rDNA (green) loci on chromosomes of Xingu accessions were similar among them (Figure 5A), as well as in A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ (Figure 5B) and A. monticola (Figure 5C). The loci were on the proximal region of chromosomes A3 and B3, along the short arms, as observed in the diploid species A. duranensis, A. ipaënsis, A. stenosperma and A. magna. This pattern corresponds to an additive character, with one locus from the species with A genome and the other from a B genome species, as already established for A. hypogaea and A. monticola (Seijo et al., 2004; Robledo et al., 2009; Robledo and Seijo, 2010).

Figure 5. FISH using 5S (green) and 45S (red) rDNA probes, followed by DAPI counterstaining (blue). A) Xingu type Of 126; B) A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ and C) A. monticola V 14165. Chromosome B3 shows 5S and 45S rDNA signals co-localized. A10 with secondary constriction, short arm and proximal segment of the long arm (*) and the satellite (°). Bar: 5μm.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Similarly, 45S rDNA loci (red) number is also an additive character in Xingu accessions (Figure 5A), A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ (Figure 5B) and A. monticola (Figure 5C). Loci were located on the proximal regions of long arms of A2, A10 and B10, proximal regions of short arms of B3 and terminal region of short arms of B7. These loci result from the sum of the two loci from A. duranensis and three from A. ipaënsis, since the number, size and position are not compatible with the loci present in the other diploid species, A. stenosperma and A. magna.

Hybridization signals using the 45S rDNA probe can form, consistently, a distinguishable thread-like constriction linking the long segment and satellite region of A10 (Figure 5A). This aspect depicts the 45S rDNA being translated, what is characteristic of NORs (Nucleoli Organizing Region), which is frequently observed and available in the literature, including our previous work (Seijo et al., 2004; Nascimento et al., 2018). Co-localization of FISH signals after simultaneous use of 5S and 45S rDNA probes was observed on B3 of Xingu accessions (Figure 5A), as well as in A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ (Figure 5B) and A. monticola (Figure 5C).

These results are summarized in Figure 6, including a karyotype of the Xingu type Of 126, representing the other two accessions studied, showing schematically chromosomes morphology, centromere position, DAPI+ and CMA3 + banding patterns and 5S and 45S rDNA loci distribution. Together, A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata var. fastigiata ‘IAC Tatu-ST’, A. monticola (V 14165), A. duranensis (V 14167), A. ipaënsis (K 30076), A. stenosperma (V 10309) and A. magna (K 30097) karyotypes were included to enable an easy cytogenetic comparison.

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the Arachis karyotypes showing the morphology of chromosomes; position of centromeres (m: metacentric and sm: submetacentric); DAPI+ (white) and CMA3 + (yellow) bands and rDNA loci, 5S (green) and 45S (red) in chromosomes of Xingu type Of 126; A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’; A. monticola V 14165; A. duranensis V 14167; A. stenosperma V 10309; A. ipaënsis K 30076 and A. magna K 30097.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Genetic relationships based on SNP data

Five accessions from Xingu, 18 A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea, four A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata, and five A. monticola accessions were genotyped using the Axiom_Arachis2, an array composed of 47,837 SNPs. After filtering and exclusion of inconsistent calls, 7,883 SNPs were identified. Using this data, genetic distances in pairwise comparisons of the 32 accessions (Table 1) were estimated by the formula 1-IBS, with IBS defined as the probability that alleles drawn at random from two individuals at the same locus are the same (Figure S3 (709.2KB, pdf) ). The resulting matrix was used to construct a dendrogram using UPGMA (Figure 6). The 32 accessions were grouped according to the four taxonomic groups, as expected: A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea, A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata, A. monticola and Xingu accessions (Figure 7). The Xingu accessions were closer to A. monticola than to the other A. hypogaea accessions of the two subspecies. When considering only A. hypogaea, the Xingu accessions were closer to subsp. hypogaea.

Figure 7. Dendrogram representing the genetic distance matrix based on SNP data, showing four taxonomic clusters including 22 A. hypogaea, five A. monticola and five Xingu Park accessions.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Affinity analysis of different Xingu accessions and accessions of A. hypogaea using A. stenosperma specific SNPs, showed no significant signal of A. stenosperma regions in any analyzed sample (Table S1 (2.1MB, pdf) ). These data evidenced that A. stenosperma had not been involved in the origin of these Xingu accessions, as well as other cultivated peanut accessions.

Discussion

High levels of genetic variation in Xingu Park accessions have previously been detected using microsatellite markers (Freitas et al., 2007). In this study, 31 Xingu accessions were classified into three similarity groups, from which the Xingu accessions included in this study were selected. Despite of morphological differences and genetic variation evidenced by microsatellite markers, this cytogenetic study did not detect differences among the three Xingu accessions (Of 115, Of 120 and Of 126).

The similar DAPI+ heterochromatic banding pattern detected for the three Xingu accessions, A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’, and A. monticola, as well as as the previous description of for the induced allotetraploid IpaDur1 (Nascimento et al., 2018), corresponded to the sum of the patterns present in A. duranensis and A. ipaënsis. This indicates the maintenance of the organization of the AT rich DNA sequences on the centromere region of the chromosomes of the A subgenome. Interestingly, DAPI+ centromeric bands are equally conserved in these allotetraploids, independent of spontaneous or induced origin and masculine or feminine role played by the species during the formation of allotetraploid.

On the other hand, a diversified pattern of CMA3 + bands could be herein observed. The distribution pattern of CMA3 + bands in the three Xingu accessions corresponds only to that found in the induced allotetraploid IpaDur1 (Nascimento et al., 2018), which is the sum of the bands present in both the progenitor species, which differs from the patterns in A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ and A. monticola. It is well known that CMA3 + bands are highly associated with rDNA loci, and NORs (Schweizer, 1976; Sato and Yoshioka, 1984; Guerra, 2000; Penãloza and Valls, 2005; Silva et al., 2010), since these loci comprise DNA regions flanked by CG-rich heterochromatin (Salvadori et al., 1995; Deiana et al., 2000). The association between rDNA loci and CMA3 bands is entire only in A. hypogaea, ‘IAC Tatu-ST’, where the correspondence between number, position and intensity of CMA3 + bands and 45S rDNA loci is evident, suggesting the same type of heterochromatin in both (Galasso et al., 1996; Cerbah et al., 1998). However, not all GC-rich heterochromatin DNA regions behave equally to CMA3 (Schwarzacher and Schweizer, 1982; Kenton, 1991), as it is observed in other allotetraploids and diploids here studied, where the CMA3 + bands and 45S rDNA loci correspondence is only detected with a large 45S rDNA loci that corresponds to NORs.

Variation in CMA3 + bands distribution have been also reported for other plant species and their related genotypes (Guerra, 2000; Carvalho et al., 2005; Cabral et al., 2006), revealing differences in GC-rich heterochromatin (Schwezer, 1981). Additionally, it is acknowledged that most plant species have at least one pair of chromosomes containing a NOR, hence at least one pair of chromosomes displays the corresponding CMA3 + band (Morawetz, 1986; Röser, 1994; Guerra et al., 2000). As like in Arachis, some species, such as Hedera helix (König et al., 1987) and Cicer arietinum (Galasso et al., 1996) have one or two pairs of CMA3 + bands at a very similar chromosome position to that of the NOR, although no secondary constriction can be observed, as it is the case of the chromosome B10 of these Arachis allotetraploids.

Therefore, the absence of direct and clear correspondence between CMA3 + bands and some of the 45S rDNA loci in the Arachis genomes may be the result of possible variations in DNA bases composition, affecting the fluorescence patterns obtained. For example, changes could be due to the type of DNA content along the chromosome and substitutions of DNA bases by analogs. Variations in the accessibility of the chromosomal DNA can result in differential protein distribution, associated with the chromosome and remodeling of chromatin fibers that could be here, influencing detection of CMA3 fluorescence (Schwezer, 1981). Yet, 45S rDNA loci could be so small that the corresponding CMA3 bands display bands with low intensity, not detectable (Zoldos et al., 1999; Marcon et al., 2003, 2005), as for example, Citrus (Carvalho et al., 2005) and Maxillaria (Cabral et al., 2006), where the correspondence between rDNA loci and CMA3 + bands is not complete.

There are numerous processes involved in chromatin remodeling, therefore rDNA sequences may exist in distinct conformation in allotetraploids mainly, since the doubling of genomes significantly affects gene expression, resulting for example, in induced gene silencing (Liu and Wendel, 2002, 2003). These changes are mostly determined by specific epigenetic codes, such as cytosine methylation and post translational changes in histones (Neves et al., 2005) that affect the chromatin structure and interaction with fluorophores (Cabral et al., 2006). Since expected 45S rDNA loci were detected in all genotypes after in situ hybridization, it is considered that heterochromatin is differently organized in these genotypes of Arachis, where depending the levels of condensation, the detection of CMA3 + bands can be favored or not (Schwezer, 1981).

GISH using probes of A. duranensis and A. ipaënsis on chromosomes of Xingu accessions corroborated the preferential hybridization of these diploid genomes to their corresponding subgenomes, as previously described for A. hypogaea, A. monticola and the induced allotetraploid, IpaDur1 (A. duranensis x A. ipaënsis)4x (Seijo et al., 2007; Nascimento et al., 2018). The hybridization on A chromosomes of Xingu accessions with A. duranensis probe, together with the exclusive DAPI+ bands on centromeres of the chromosomes of the A subgenome allowed the differentiation of A and B subgenomes in these accessions. Additionally, the numerous repetitive elements between subgenomes was indicated by numerous overlapping signals after double GISH in Xingu chromosomes, consistent to what has been previously shown in other Arachis allotetraploids (Nascimento et al., 2018).

The low levels of hybridization on A9, A10 and the terminal regions of chromosomes of the allotetraploids reflects a low repetitive DNA content, and, being gene rich (Bertioli et al., 2016), are likely in an open chromatin conformation and and therefore, expected to show lower levels of fluorescence intensity in GISH assays (Seijo et al., 2007; Nascimento et al., 2018). Lastly, the centromeric regions of A subgenomes of Arachis seems to be evidenced only by DAPI, although centromeres are the most condensed regions of chromosomes that could be labeled by in situ hybridization. Therefore, the poor hybridization on the centromeric regions of A subgenome chromosomes may be related to different levels of accessibility of the probes to the homologous sequences (Seijo et al., 2007). The accessibility also depends on the DNA sequence organization, determined by the families of tandemly repetitive DNA sequences present in the region. It is important to note that longer exposure to enzymatic treatment can improve the hybridization but results in a considerable loss of chromosome morphology.

Double GISH, using the genomic probes from A. stenosperma and A. magna showed lower hybridization levels than observed after hybridization with A. duranensis and A. ipaënsis probes, respectively. This is a key cytogenetic evidence that the latter species were also the genome donors of the Xingu accessions, and the contribution of A. stenosperma or A. magna to Xingu genomes is very unlikely. In fact, the center of origin of A. stenosperma is nearby the Xingu Indigenous Park and hybridization with its genomic probe shows evident signals, however this may indicate the occurrence of similarities between repetitive elements with another Arachis species with A genome, such as A. duranensis (Bertioli et al., 2013, 2016; Moretzsohn et al., 2013; Shirasawa et al., 2013). In addition, five Xingu accessions were screened for SNPs present in seven diverse accessions of A. stenosperma and absent in two accessions of A. duranensis, A. ipaënsis and six non-Xingu A. hypogaea – no significant signal of these A. stenosperma SNPs was found in the Xingu accessions.

Besides, intron sequences from the A subgenome and their homeologs from the B subgenome were sequenced in seven accessions of A. hypogaea, representing both subspecies and the six varieties, plus an accession collected in Xingu Indigenous Park (Of 122), showing that the A and B subgenomes of all genotypes analyzed were grouped with A. duranensis and A. ipaënsis, respectively, and separately from all the other wild diploid species, including A. stenosperma (Moretzsohn et al., 2013). It is also important to mention that the patterns resulting from recombination between ancestral A and B genomes are extremely similar in more than 200 genotypes of A. hypogaea, and other three Xingu accessions (Of 292, Of 299, and Of 303) (Bertioli et al., 2019). Together, these studies studies corroborate the shared origin and similarity between Xingu accessions and representatives accessions of the two subspecies and six varieties of A. hypogaea.

In the three Xingu accessions, the number and localization of 5S rDNA loci were the same and corresponded to the sum of those found in A. duranensis and A. ipaënsis, as well as A. stenosperma and A. magna. Moreover, the distribution was the same as previously found for other A. hypogaea accessions, A. monticola, several Arachis diploid species, and IpaDur1 (Seijo et al., 2004; Robledo and Seijo, 2010; Nascimento et al., 2018), confirming the stability and heritance of 5S rDNA sequence in Arachis genome.

The 45S rDNA loci distribution in the three Xingu accessions, observed on A2, A10, B3, B7 and B10 chromosomes, was similar to other A. hypogaea accessions and A. monticola (Seijo et al., 2004; Nascimento et al., 2018), but different from IpaDur1, that lacks loci on B7 and B10. The loss of 45S rDNA loci in IpaDur1 might be related to the fact that it has A. ipaënsis as the female progenitor, the opposite direction to A. hypogaea and A. monticola. Despite this difference, the presence of the NOR on the chromosomes of the A subgenome in these Arachis allotetraploids corroborates the dominance of A10 of A. duranensis after allotetraploidization, as described for IpaDur1 and other spontaneous Arachis allotetraploids (Nascimento et al., 2018).

The 45S rDNA loci in the three Xingu accessions were similar to the sum of those present in A. duranensis (A2, A10) and A. ipaënsis (B3, B7 and B10), distinctive from those in A. stenosperma (A2, A10 and A7) (Robledo et al., 2009) and A. magna (B3, B7, B10 and B4) (Robledo and Seijo, 2010). Interestingly, the cytogenetic analysis of five Brazilian accessions of A. magna (V 13748, V 13765, V 14724, V 14727 and V 14750) (Custódio et al., 2013) identified polymorphisms of the 45S rDNA loci among themselves, and these various patterns also differed from the K 30097. Most importantly is that all of the patterns observed in these accessions were different from that in the Xingu accessions and conclusively, it is assumed that none of these accessions may had participate in the genome origin of the Xingu accessions. On the other hand, is interesting to note that the accession V 14165 of A. monticola, despite being from Argentina, showed similar patterns of rDNA distribution and GISH affinity to those previously determined for another three accessions (Sn 2774, Sn 2775 and K 30062) (Seijo et al., 2004). Additionally, the genotyping (SNPs) of others five accessions (Sc 21768, Sc 21769, K 30062, K 30063 and Ba 7264) confirmed the high similarity among them, suggesting that A. monticola accessions are genetically very close to each other, and may share similar characteristics, including the cytogenetic patterns, what allowed us the generalization of the cytogenetic conclusion based in our experiments with Argentinian.

Considering other Arachis species with A and B genomes previously studied and comparing with these Xingu accessions, it is possible to observe differences, such as the morphology of the chromosomes, the heterochromatin and SAT chromosomes (Robledo et al., 2009; Robledo and Seijo, 2010), number, size and localization of rDNA loci and variation in the NORs (Seijo et al., 2004; Robledo et al., 2009; Robledo and Seijo, 2010). In addition, the low genomic affinity of these diploid species was observed by GISH when hybridized to chromosomes of A. hypogaea and A. monticola (Raina and Mukai, 1999; Seijo et al., 2007), strengthening the hypothesis that A. duranensis and A. ipaënsis are the closest genomes and share similarities with the allotetraploids studied here.

Overall, the majority of the cytogenetic differences detected among the Xingu accessions, A. hypogaea ‘IAC Tatu-ST’ and A. monticola are related to the distribution of CMA3 + bands, more specifically in chromosomes B3, B7 and B10, suggesting that the B subgenome, inherited from A. ipaënsis, may be more affected by allotetraploidization than A subgenome. Differences in chromosomes B3 and B7 were also observed in the induced allotetraploid IpaDur1 (Nascimento et al., 2018), where 45S rDNA loci lacked detection. Furthermore, chromosome B10 of this induced allotetraploid shows the indicative of recombination between A and B subgenomes, after double GISH. Finally, the SNP genotyping studies detected deletions and recombinations, such as tetrasomy and exchange of DNA blocks and alleles interspersed along the chromosomal segments, between the induced allotetraploid subgenomes (Bertioli et al., 2019), a bias of DNA sequences of the B subgenome towards the A subgenome. These data strengthen the idea that the genomic instability may be affecting more the reorganization of chromosomes B.

For SNP genotyping, two additional accessions from Xingu Park were included: Of 122 also classified as Xingu type, and Of 128, morphologically distinguished as Nambikwara type, characterized by very large seeds, straight pods with prominent longitudinal ridges, and a thick, hard fruit shell (Freitas et al., 2007). Despite being morphologically very different, four of the five accessions included grouped together, corroborating the results of the cytogenetic analyses. The exception was Of 120, which is considered the most antique among the peanuts cultivated by the Kayabi, having some characteristics comparable to those of A. monticola, but with much larger seeds. Of 120 showed to be closely related to A. monticola in a previous study (Freitas et al., 2007). However, it is morphologically different from the other Xingu accessions and classified as A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea. Therefore, its clustering outside the group of Xingu and A. monticola was expected and seems to be more realistic. The number and genomic distribution of SNP markers used in the present study (47,837) was considerably higher than the 13 microsatellite loci used in the previous study of Freitas et al. (2007) and can explain this contradictory result.

The Xingu Park accessions were found to be more closely related to A. monticola than to A. hypogaea accessions from the two subspecies. Although classified as A. hypogaea, the Xingu Park accessions have morphological traits, especially in the pods, that exceeds the variation described for the species. Arachis monticola is considered the immediate tetraploid ancestor from which A. hypogaea has arisen upon domestication (Raina and Mukai, 1999; Grabiele et al., 2012; Bertioli et al., 2019). The group containing the Xingu and A. monticola accessions was more closely related to A. hypogaea subsp. hypogaea than to the group of A. hypogaea subsp. fastigiata accessions, as expected and corroborating the microsatellite-based analysis of Freitas et al. (2007). These results suggest that the accessions from Xingu Park have experienced a distinct process of evolution under artificial selection, as compared to the other A. hypogaea accessions, despite of the origin from the same diploid species. The taxonomic status of the Xingu Park accessions deserves further investigation.

Conclusively, the hypothesis that all varieties and subspecies of A. hypogaea originated from a single allotetraploid, or that they could had arisen from allotetraploid populations originating from the same two diploid species (Seijo et al., 2007) is herein reinforced. Our results strongly suggest the same origin for the different accessions of Xingu and the two subspecies of A. hypogaea. The contribution of A. duranensis and A. ipaënsis genomes for the formation of the three Xingu Park accessions was confirmed, together with the identification of many cytogenetic resemblances among themselves and with the fastigiata subspecies of A. hypogaea, wild species and induced allotetraploids.

We conclude that the morphological variability existing in the three Xingu Park accessions is not due to the participation of different diploid species on their origin, but it is mostly result of the high morphological plasticity and selection done by the Brazilian indigenous people. To further investigate the taxonomic status of the Xingu Park accessions, additional collections of Arachis germplasm are necessary, followed by characterization and conservation of known and new genotypes.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. M.T. Pozzobon for technical support and useful discussions; Leandro Mesquita, for greenhouse assistance; financial support from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES - Brasil, Finance code 001) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAP-DF) and to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq-Proc. 310026/2018-0).

Supplementary material

The following online material is available for this article:

Figure S1. Double GISH showing similar labeling patterns in chromosomes of Xingu/Nambikwara of 115.
Click here for additional data file. (241.4KB, pdf)
Figure S2. Double GISH showing similar labeling patterns in chromosomes of Xingu/Nambikwara Of 115.
Click here for additional data file. (236KB, pdf)
Figure S3. Matrix representing the genetic distance among the Arachis accessions obtained by 1-IBS (identity by state) in pairwise comparisons.
Click here for additional data file. (709.2KB, pdf)
Table S1. Genotyping of Arachis accessions using A. stenosperma specific SNPs.
Click here for additional data file. (2.1MB, pdf)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Marcelo Guerra

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicial to the impartiality of the reported research.

Authors Contributions

ACGA, SCMLB, FOF, PMGG and JFMV conceived and the study; EFMBN, CC, MCM and DJB conducted the experiments; EFMBN, ACGA, MCM, CC, SCMLB, DJB, FOF analyzed the data; EFMBN, ACGA, SCMLB, DJB, MCM, FOF, JFMV, CC and PMG wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version.

References

  1. Bertioli DJ, Vidigal B, Nielen S, Ratnaparkhe MB, Lee TH, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Kim M, Guimarães PM, Seijo G, Schwarzacher T, et al. The repetitive component of the A genome of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and its role in remodelling intergenic sequence space since its evolutionary divergence from the B genome. Ann Bot. 2013;112:545–559. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertioli DJ, Cannon SB, Froenicke L, Huang G, Farmer AD, Cannon EKS, Liu X, Gao D, Clevenger J, Dash S, et al. The genome sequences of Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaënsis, the diploid ancestors of cultivated peanut. Nat Genet. 2016;48:438–446. doi: 10.1038/ng.3517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertioli DJ, Jenkins J, Clevenger J, Dudchenko O, Gao D, Seijo G, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Ren L, Farmer AD, Pandey MK, et al. The genome sequence of segmental allotetraploid peanut Arachis hypogaea . Nat Genet. 2019;51:877. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0405-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2633–2635. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cabral JS, Felix LP, Guerra M. Heterochromatin diversity and its colocalization with 5S and 45S rDNA sites in chromosomes of four Maxillaria species (Orchidaceae) Genet Mol Biol. 2006;29:659–664. [Google Scholar]
  6. Carvalho R, Soares-Filho WS, Brasileiro-Vidal AC, Guerra M. The relationships among lemons, limes and citron: a chromosomal comparison. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;109:276–282. doi: 10.1159/000082410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cerbah M, Coulaud J, Siljak-Yakovlev S. rDNA organization and evolutionary relationships in the genus Hypochaeris (Asteraceae) J Hered. 1998;89:312–318. [Google Scholar]
  8. Custódio AR, Seijo G, Valls JFM. Characterization of Brazilian accessions of wild Arachis species of section Arachis (Fabaceae) using heterochromatin detection and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) Genet Mol Biol. 2013;36:364–370. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572013000300011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deiana AM, Cau A, Salvadori S, Coluccia E, Cannas R, Milia A, Tagliavini J. Major and 5S ribosomal sequences of the largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides (Perciformes, Centrarchidae) are localized in GC-rich regions of the genome. Chromosome Res. 2000;8:213–218. doi: 10.1023/a:1009248828365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 1987;19:11–15. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fernández A, Krapovickas A. Cromosomas y evolucion en Arachis (Leguminosae) Bonplandia. 1994;8:187–220. [Google Scholar]
  12. Freitas FO, Moretzsohn MC, Valls JFM. Genetic variability of Brazilian Indian accessions of Arachis hypogaea L. Genet Mol Res. 2007;6:675–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Galasso I, Frediani M, Cremonini R, Pignone D. Chromatin characterization by banding techniques, in situ hybridization, and nuclear DNA content in Cicer L. (Leguminosae) Genome. 1996;39:258–265. doi: 10.1139/g96-035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grabiele M, Chalup L, Robledo G, Seijo G. Genetic and geographic origin of domesticated peanut as evidenced by 5S rDNA and chloroplast DNA sequences. Plant Syst Evol. 2012;298:1151–1165. [Google Scholar]
  15. Guerra M. Patterns of heterochromatin distribution in plant chromosomes. Genet Mol Biol. 2000;23:1029–1041. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kenton A. Heterochromatin accumulation, disposition and diversity in Gibasis karwinskyana (Commelinaceae) Chromosoma. 1991;100:467–478. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kochert G, Halward T, Branch WD, Simpson CE. RFLP variability in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars and wild species. Theor Appl Genet. 1991;81:565–570. doi: 10.1007/BF00226719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kochert G, Stalker HT, Gimenes M, Galgaro L, Lopes CR, Moore K. RFLP and cytogenetic evidence on the origin and evolution of allotetraploid domesticated peanut, Arachis hypogaea (Leguminosae) Am J Bot. 1996;83:282–1291. [Google Scholar]
  19. König C, Ebert I, Greilhuber J. A DNA cytophotometric and chromosome banding study in Hedera helix (Araliaceae), with reference to differential DNA replication associated with juvenile-adult phase change. Genome. 1987;29:498–503. [Google Scholar]
  20. Koppolu R, Upadhyaya HD, Dwivedi SL, Hoisington DA, Varshney RK. Genetic relationships among seven sections of genus Arachis studied by using SSR markers. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Korani W, Clevenger JP, Chu Y, Ozias-Akins P. Machine learning as an effective method for identifying true single nucleotide polymorphisms in polyploid plants. Plant Genome. 2019;12:1. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2018.05.0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krapovickas A, Gregory WC. Taxonomía del género Arachis (Leguminosae) Bonplandia. 1994;8:1–186. [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu B, Wendel JF. Non-Mendelian phenomena in polyploid genome evolution. Curr Genomics. 2002;3:489–505. [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu B, Wendel JF. Epigenetic phenomena and the evolution of plant allopolyploids. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003;29:365–379. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00213-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Marcon AB, Barros ICL, Guerra M. A karyopyte comparison between two closely related species of Acrostichum . Am Fern J. 2003;93:116–125. [Google Scholar]
  26. Marcon AB, Barros ICL, Guerra M. Variation in chro- mosome numbers, CMA bands and 45S rDNA sites in species of Selaginella (Pteridophyta) Ann Bot. 2005;95:271–276. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Morawetz W. Remarks on karyological differentiation patterns in tropical woody plants. Plant Syst Evol. 1986;152:49–100. [Google Scholar]
  28. Moretzsohn MC, Hopkins MS, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Valls JFM, Ferreira ME. Genetic diversity of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and its wild relatives based on the analysis of hypervariable regions of the genome. BMC Plant Biol. 2004;4:11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-4-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Moretzsohn MC, Gouvea EG, Inglis PW, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Valls JFM, Bertioli DJ. A study of the relationships of cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and its most closely related wild species using intron sequences and microsatellite markers. Ann Bot. 2013;111:113–126. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nascimento EFDM, Santos BV, Marques LO, Guimarães PM, Brasileiro AC, Leal-Bertioli SC, Bertioli DJ, Araujo AC. The genome structure of Arachis hypogaea (Linnaeus, 1753) and an induced Arachis allotetraploid revealed by molecular cytogenetics. Comp Cytogenet. 2018;12:111–140. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v12i1.20334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Neves N, Delgado M, Silva M, Caperta A, Morais-Cecílio L, Viegas W. Ribosomal DNA heterochromatin in plants. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;109:104–111. doi: 10.1159/000082388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Novaes W. Xingu - uma flecha no coração. Editora Brasiliense; São Paulo: 1985. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pedrosa A, Sandal N, Stougaard J, Schweizer D, Bachmair A. Chromosomal map of the model legume Lotus japonicus . Genetics. 2002;161:1661–1672. doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.4.1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Penãloza APS, Valls JFM. Chromosome number and satellited chromosome morphology of eleven species of Arachis (Leguminosae) Bonplandia. 2005;14:65–72. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pickersgill B, Heiser C. Origins and distribution of plants domesticated in the New World Tropics. Origins of agriculture. 1977:803–835. [Google Scholar]
  36. Raina SN, Mukai Y. Genomic in situ hybridization in Arachis (Fabaceae) identifies the diploid wild progenitors of cultivated (A. hypogaea) and related wild (A. monticola) peanut species. Plant Syst Evol. 1999;214:251–262. [Google Scholar]
  37. Robledo G, Seijo G. Characterization of the Arachis (Leguminosae) D genome using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) chromosome markers and total genome DNA hybridization. Genet Mol Biol. 2008;31:717–724. [Google Scholar]
  38. Robledo G, Seijo G. Species relationships among the wild B genome of Arachis species (section Arachis) based on FISH mapping of rDNA loci and heterochromatin detection: A new proposal for genome arrangement. Theor Appl Genet. 2010;121:1033–1046. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1369-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Robledo G, Lavia GI, Seijo G. Species relations among wild Arachis species with the A genome as revealed by FISH mapping of rDNA loci and heterochromatin detection. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;118:1295–1307. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-0981-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Röser M. Pathways of karyological differentiation in palms (Arecaceae) Plant Syst Evol. 1994;189:83–122. [Google Scholar]
  41. Salvadori S, Deiana AM, Coluccia E, Floridia G, Rossi E, Zuffardi O. Colocalization of (TTAGGG)n telomeric sequences and ribosomal genes in Atlantic eels. Chromosome Res. 1995;3:54–58. doi: 10.1007/BF00711162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sato S, Yoshioka T. Heterogeneity of heterochromatin segments in Nothoscordum fragrans chromosomes. Caryologia. 1984;37:197–205. [Google Scholar]
  43. Schwarzacher T, Schweizer D. Karyotype analysis and heterochromatin differentiation with Giemsa C-banding and fluorescent counterstaining in Cephalanthera (Orchidaceae) Plant Syst Evol. 1982;141:91–113. [Google Scholar]
  44. Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison J. Practical in situ hybridization. BIOS Scientific Publishers; Oxford: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  45. Schweizer D. Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma. 1976;58:307–324. doi: 10.1007/BF00292840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schwezer D. Counterstainenhanced chromosome banding. Hum Genet. 1981;57:1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schweizer D, Ambros P. Chromosome banding: stain combinations for specific regions. Methods Mol Biol. 1994;29:97–112. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-289-2:97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Seijo JG, Lavia GI, Fernández A, Krapovickas A, Ducasse D, Moscone EA. Physical mapping of the 5S and 18S-25S rRNA genes by FISH as evidence that Arachis duranensis and A. ipaënsis are the wild diploid progenitors of A. hypogaea (Leguminosae) Am J Bot. 2004;91:1294–1303. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.9.1294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Seijo G, Lavia GI, Fernández A, Krapovickas A, Ducasse DA, Bertioli DJ, Moscone EA. Genomic relationships between the cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea, Leguminosae) and its close relatives revealed by double GISH. Am J Bot. 2007;94:1963–1971. doi: 10.3732/ajb.94.12.1963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shirasawa K, Bertioli DJ, Varshney RK, Moretzsohn MC, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Thudi M, Pandey MK. Integrated consensus map of cultivated peanut and wild relatives reveals structures of the a and b genomes of Arachis and divergence of the legume genomes. DNA Res. 2013;20:173–184. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dss042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Silva SC, Martins MIG, Santos RC, Peñaloza APS, Melo PA, Filho, Benko-Iseppon AM, Valls JFM, Carvalho R. Karyological features and banding patterns in Arachis species belonging to the Heteranthae section. Plant Syst Evol. 2010;285:201–207. [Google Scholar]
  52. Silvestri MC, Ortiz AM, Lavia GI. rDNA loci and heterochromatin positions support a distinct genome type for ‘x = 9 species’ of section Arachis (Arachis, Leguminosae) Plant Syst Evol. 2015;301:555–562. [Google Scholar]
  53. Simpson CE, Krapovickas A, Valls JFM. History of Arachis, including evidence of A. hypogaea L. progenitors. Peanut Science. 2001;28:78–80. [Google Scholar]
  54. Smith BW. Arachis hypogaea. Aerial flower and subterranean fruit. Am J Bot. 1950;37:802–815. [Google Scholar]
  55. Stalker HT. A new species in section Arachis of peanuts with a D genome. Am J Bot. 1991;78:630–637. [Google Scholar]
  56. Stalker HT, Simpson CE. Germplasm resources in Arachis. In: Pattee HE, Stalker HT, editors. Advances in Peanut Science. APRES Inc.; Stillwater, OK: 1995. pp. 14–53. [Google Scholar]
  57. Suassuna TMF, Matos RG, Freitas FO. Diálogos de saberes: relatos da Embrapa. Embrapa; Brasília: 2016. [Google Scholar]
  58. Valls JFM. Diversidade genética no gênero Arachis e a origem do amendoim. Anais do Encontro sobre temas de Genética e Melhoramento, Piracicaba. 2000:19. [Google Scholar]
  59. Valls JFM, Costa LC, Custódio AR. A novel trifoliolate species of Arachis (Fabaceae) and further comments on the taxonomic section Trierectoides. Bonplandia. 2013;22:91–97. [Google Scholar]
  60. Wanzenböck EM, Schöfer C, Schweizer D, Bachmair A. Ribosomal transcription units inte- grated via T - DNA transformation associate with the nucleolus and do not require upstream repeat sequences for activity in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant J. 1997;11:1007–1016. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.11051007.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zoldos V, Papes D, Cerbah M, Panaud O, Besenborfer V, Siljak-Yakovlev S. Molecular cytogenetic studies of ribosomal genes and heterochromatin reveal conserved genome organization among 11 Quercus species. Theor Appl Genet. 1999;99:969–977. [Google Scholar]

Internet Resources

  1. FigTree software v.1.4.4. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed September 2019)
  2. United States Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service - USDA-FAS World Agricultural Production. 2019. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/production.pdf. (accessed March 2019)

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. Double GISH showing similar labeling patterns in chromosomes of Xingu/Nambikwara of 115.
Click here for additional data file. (241.4KB, pdf)
Figure S2. Double GISH showing similar labeling patterns in chromosomes of Xingu/Nambikwara Of 115.
Click here for additional data file. (236KB, pdf)
Figure S3. Matrix representing the genetic distance among the Arachis accessions obtained by 1-IBS (identity by state) in pairwise comparisons.
Click here for additional data file. (709.2KB, pdf)
Table S1. Genotyping of Arachis accessions using A. stenosperma specific SNPs.
Click here for additional data file. (2.1MB, pdf)

Articles from Genetics and Molecular Biology are provided here courtesy of Sociedade Brasileira de Genética

RESOURCES