Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Nov 5;10:19168. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76069-3

A primer set for the rapid isolation of scFv fragments against cell surface antigens from immunised rats

Francesco Nannini 1, Farhaan Parekh 1, Patrycja Wawrzyniecka 1, Leila Mekkaoui 1, Matteo Righi 1, Fatemeh V Dastjerdi 2, Jenny Yeung 2, Claire Roddie 1, Yuchen Bai 3, Biao Ma 3, Mathieu Ferrari 3, Shimobi Onuoha 3, Kerry Chester 2,#, Martin Pule 1,3,✉,#
PMCID: PMC7644676  PMID: 33154441

Abstract

Antibody phage display is a powerful platform for discovery of clinically applicable high affinity monoclonal antibodies against a broad range of targets. Libraries generated from immunized animals offer the advantage of in vivo affinity-maturation of V regions prior to library generation. Despite advantages, few studies have described isolation of antibodies from rats using immune phage display. In our study, we describe a novel primer set, covering the full rat heavy chain variable and kappa light chain variable regions repertoire for the generation of an unbiased immune libraries. Since the immune repertoire of rats is poorly understood, we first performed a deep sequencing analysis of the V(D)J regions of VH and VLK genes, demonstrating the high abundance of IGVH2 and IGVH5 families for VH and IGVLK12 and IGVLK22 for VLK. The comparison of gene’s family usage in naïve rats have been used to validate the frequency’s distribution of the primer set, confirming the absence of PCR-based biases. The primers were used to generate and assemble a phage display library from human CD160-vaccinated rats. CD160 represents a valid therapeutic target as it has been shown to be expressed on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells and on the surface of newly formed vessels. We utilised a novel phage display panning strategy to isolate a high affinity pool (KD range: 0.399–233 nM) of CD160 targeting monoclonal antibodies. Subsequently, identified binders were tested for function as third generation Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR) T cells demonstrating specific cytolytic activity. Our novel primer set coupled with a streamlined strategy for phage display panning enable the rapid isolation and identification of high affinity antibodies from immunised rats. The therapeutic utility of these antibodies was demonstrated in CAR format.

Subject terms: Antibody generation, Membrane proteins, Immunotherapy

Introduction

Single-chain variable fragment (scFv) immune phage libraries are convenient tools for antibody discovery. Immune libraries are constructed by incorporating scFv derived from an immunized animal into a phage display system. Panning of an immune scFv phage library combines advantages of both hybridoma and phage display methodologies and can quickly identify multiple diverse binders1,2.

Immune libraries are typically derived from immunized mice; but several species have served as the source of variable region diversity for antibody phage libraries including mouse, rabbit, and human35. However, the generation of rat immune libraries is still relatively unstudied6,7, despite rats having several advantages for this application8,9. For instance, rats typically undergo rapid seroconversion, have a large set of variable chains and can generate unique binders. Here, we describe a primer set for rat immune library generation which covers all rat germline heavy and kappa light chain variable genes. We exclude bias by comparing deep sequencing of pooled amplified variable regions with rat variable sequence usage.

To determine how well our primers perform, we generated binders against CD160 as a test antigen. CD160 is a GPI-anchored protein with potential to be a useful cancer target10,11; it has been detected on endothelial cells of newly formed blood vessels in human colon carcinoma and mouse B16 melanoma but not in vessels of healthy tissues12,13 CD160 has been also shown to be aberrantly expressed on B cell malignancies such as B cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL) and hairy cell leukaemia (HCL)14,15. Following successful identification of several anti-CD160 binders, we went on to determine how well the discovered binders function when incorporated into Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) format.

In the present study we have generated a rat immune phage display library for human CD160 through genetic vaccination and v-region amplification with a novel primer set. Antibodies obtained after phage selection on antigen-coated magnetic beads were characterized and studied in functional assays. The identified high affinity antibodies were used to construct 3rd generation CARs able to eradicate CD160 positive cells. This work provides a method for the rapid isolation of specific high affinity antibodies from immunized rats for use in such applications as CAR generation.

Results

Design of degenerate primer library for rat VH and VL germline genes

The IMGT database16 lists 232 Rattus norvegicus germline heavy variable (VH) sequences with 13 families, and 164 kappa light variable (VLK) sequences in 21 families. We designed 39 forward primers which anneal to the VH genes and 29 to the variable kappa light chains. Predicted pseudogenes and not in-frame Open Reading Frames (ORFs) were excluded. In rodents, the kappa light chain is predominantly used, with only 5% of mouse immunoglobulin expressing the lambda light chain, hence primers for the lambda light chain were not designed17.

Three strategies allowed the size of the primer set to be kept to a minimum: (1) The similarity shared within each family at the start of the VH genes allowed the design of several primers which cover many functional ORFs. (2) In addition, judicious incorporation of up to 3 ambiguous DNA nucleotides per primer increased the numbers of genes primed per primer; (3) Locked Nucleic Acids (LNA)18 were incorporated to anneal to conserved residues of the variable chains’ genes. This avoided the need to design long primers that further extend into the target gene; ensuring specific amplification while covering a large number of genes with the same primer (Tables 1, 2).

Table 1.

Sequence of the primers used to amplify and fuse the heavy variable chain genes into an scFv phage display library.

VH family Primer Nucleotide sequence
Family 1 MP20877 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAAGTCCAGCTGCAGCAGT
MP20878 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAGGTCCAGCTGCAGCAGTC
MP20879 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAGGTCCAGYTGCAGCAGTCTG
MP20880 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAGGTAAAGCTGCARCAGTCTGGAG
MP20881 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAGGTYAAGCTGCWGCAGTCTGG
MP20882 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAGGTACAGCTGCAGCARTCTGG
MP20883 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAGGTCCAGTTGCAGCARTCTGG
MP20884 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAGGTCCAGCTGCAKCAGT
MP20885 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGARGTTCAWCTGCARCAGTCTGGG
MP20886 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGGAGTMCWGCTGCAGMAGTC
Family 2 MP20887 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAAGTGCARCTRAAGGAGTCAGGACC
MP20888 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAGGTGCAGCTGAAGGAGACAGGACC
MP20889 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAAGTGCAGTGGAAGGAGTCAGG
MP20890 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAGGTGCAGCTCAAGGAGTCAG
Family 3 MP20891 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAGGTGCAGMTTCAGGAGTCAGG
MP20892 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAGGTGAATCTTCAGGAGTCAGGACC
Family 4 MP20893 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAGGTGAARCTTGTCGAGTCTGGAGG
Family 5 MP20894 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAGGTGCAGCTGGTGGAGTC
MP20895 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAGGTGCAGCTRGTGGAGWCTG
MP20896 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAGGTACAGCTGGTKGAGTCTGG
MP20897 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGARGTGAAGCTGGTRGAGTCTGGG
MP20898 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAGTCTGGGGGAGGATTAGTACAGC
Family 6 MP20899 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAGGTGAAACTGGAGGAATCTGGG
MP20900 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAGGTGCAGCTTGTAGAGACAGG
Family 8 MP20901 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAGGTTACTCTGAAAGAGTCTGGTCC
Family 9 MP20902 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCCAGATYCAGTTGGTACAGTCTGGACCTG
Family 10 MP20903 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAGGTGCAGCTTGTTGAGTCTGG
Family 11 MP20904 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAAGYACAGCTGGTGGAGTCTGG
MP20905 AAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCGAAGTGAAGCTGGTGGARTCTGGAG
Joining region (HJ) MP20906 CCAGAGCCACCTCCGCCTGAACCGCCTCCACCTGAGGACACGGTGACCATGG
MP20907 CCAGAGCCACCTCCGCCTGAACCGCCTCCACCTGAGGAGACTGTGACCATGACTCCT
MP20908 CCAGAGCCACCTCCGCCTGAACCGCCTCCACCTGAAGAGACAGTGACCAGAGTGCC
MP20909 CCAGAGCCACCTCCGCCTGAACCGCCTCCACCTGAGGAGACAGTGACTGAAGCTCC
Overlap extension PCR VH outer primer TAGATAGATTAAAGGCCCAGCCGGCCATG

The table includes forward and reverse primer specific for different genes of the heavy variable chain families and joining regions of Rattus norvegicus germline sequences. An outer forward primer was used for the overlap extension PCR with the kappa variable chains products to generate the scFv phagemid library. The primer may include an ambiguous DNA nucleotide (Y, R, W, S, K and M) to increase the coverage for families containing large number of subgroups while only 1 or 2 primers were required for smaller families. Four reverse primer were designed to cover all the joining regions of the VH.

Table 2.

Sequence of the primers used to amplify and fuse the kappa light variable chain genes into an scFv phage display library.

VLK family Primer Nucleotide sequence
Family 1 MP20913 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGATGTTGTG + ATGACACAAACTCC
MP20914 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGATGTTGTGTTG + ACACAAACTC
MP20915 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGATGTTGTGATGACCCAGACACCAC
MP20916 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGATATTGTG + ATGACMCAGACTCC
MP20917 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGATGTTGTGMTGACCCAGACTCCA
Family 2 MP20918 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGATAT + TGTGATGACTCAAGCTCC
MP20919 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGATATTGTGATGACCCAGGGTGCAC
MP20920 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGATATCATGATGACTCAGTCTCCCCTCTC
Family 3 MP20921 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATTGTGCTGACCCAGTCTCC
MP20922 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATTGTCTTGACCCAGTCTCCTG
MP20923 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACACTGTRCTGACCCAGTCTCC
Family 4 MP20924 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGAAATTGTGCTCACTCAGTCTCCAACAAC
MP20925 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGAA + ATTGTGCTCAYCCAGTCTC
MP20926 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGATAATGTGCTCCCTCAGTCTCCAAC
MP20927 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGAAACTGTGCTCACTCAATCTCCAACC
MP20928 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGCTATTGTTCTCAACCAGTCTCCATCCATC
MP20929 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGAAAT + TATACTCACCCAGTCTCC
Family 5 MP20930 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATCGTGCTRACTCAGTCTCCA
MP20931 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACRTTGTGYTGACTCAGTCTCCAGC
Family 6 MP20932 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACAYTGTGATGACCCAGTCTCC
MP20933 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGAACAYTGTGATGACYCAGTCTCCCA
Family 7 MP20934 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGAATGTCATGATGACCCAGTCTCCAAC
Family 8 MP20935 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACAT + TGTGATRACCCARTCT
MP20936 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATTGCGATAACCCAGTCTCC
MP20937 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACAT + TKTGATGAC + CCAG
MP20938 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATTTTGATAAACCAGTCTCCAGCCTC
Family 9 MP20939 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGCAGATCACGCTCACCCAGCAAG
Family 10 MP20940 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATCCAGWTGACCCAGTCTCCATC
MP20941 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATC + CAGWTKACCCAG
Family 12 MP20942 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATCCA + GATGACACAGTCTCC
MP20943 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGATATCCRGATG + ACWCAGTCTCC
Family 14 MP20944 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATCCAGATGACCCAGTCTCC
MP20945 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATTCAGATGACCCAGTCTCCATCC
MP20946 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATTCAGATGACSCAGKCTYCATC
Family 15 to 20 MP20947 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGATRTCCAGATG + ACMCAGTC
MP20948 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGAAACTACTGTGACCCAGTCTCCAGC
MP20949 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGACTGGAGAAACAACACAGTCTCCAGC
MP20950 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATTAGGATGACTCAGACTCCAGC
MP20951 GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGATCGGACATCCACATGACTCAGAACCCAG
Joining region (KJ) MP23454 TGCACGCTGCTAGATATGAGGCACTGCGGCCGCGTTTCAATTCCAGCTTGGTGCCTCC
MP23455 TGCACGCTGCTAGATATGAGGCACTGCGGCCGCGTTTCAGTTCCAGCTTGGTCCCAG
MP23456 TGCACGCTGCTAGATATGAGGCACTGCGGCCGCGTTTTATTTCCAGTCTGGTCTCATCACTG
MP23457 TGCACGCTGCTAGATATGAGGCACTGCGGCCGCGTTTTATTTCCAACTTCGTCCCTGAGCC
MP23458 TGCACGCTGCTAGATATGAGGCACTGCGGCCGCGTTTGATCTCCAGCTTGGTCCCAGAAC
Overlap extension PCR VLK outer primer TGCACGCTGCTAGATATGAGGCAC

The table includes forward and reverse primer specific for different genes of the kappa light chain families and joining regions of Rattus norvegicus germline sequences. An outer reverse primer was used for the overlap extension PCR for the assembly as scFv phagemid library. The primer may include an ambiguous DNA nucleotide (Y, R, W, S, K and M) and Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs) were incorporated in specific conserved residues of the variable chains’ genes facilitating the generation of short primers to avoid extension into the frame, minimizing mismatches in other regions of the primer. Five reverse primer were designed to cover all the joining regions of the VLK.

For VH regions, on average each primer amplified 23 variable genes, although smaller families required 1 or 2 primers (Supplementary Table S1). The kappa light chain genes contain a higher number of families, but a smaller number of different subgroups (Supplementary Table S2). This allowed the coverage of each family with fewer primers per family. In this instance, an average of 19 subgroups were covered per primer. We designed 4 reverse primers for VH [annealing to the heavy chain joining regions (HJ)] and 5 reverse primers for the VLK [annealing to the kappa chain joining regions (KJ)]. Together these primers cover all the possible joining regions in rat VH and VLK.

The primer tail at the 5′ end of the VH gene and the 3′ end of the VLK gene contained the annealing sites for the nested PCR outer primers and SfiI/NotI restriction sites for cloning into the phagemid vector (pHEN119). The tails at the 3′ end of the VH and the 5′ end of the VLK included the serine-glycine linker sequence (3xGGGGS) as overlapping regions. The primary PCR amplification of VH and VLK chains incorporated the outer tail regions. Overlap extension PCR created a single amplicon encoding an scFv in the VH-VLK orientation separated by a serine-glycine linker sequence.

Primer set effectively amplifies VH and VL genes without PCR-biases

We first sought to better understand the VH/VLK usage in rats, since this has not been well studied. We then could determine if our novel primer set result in biased amplification of certain VH/VLK families. Deep-sequencing of VH/VLK genes from 5′RACE and primer set amplified cDNA were studied and compared; cDNA was isolated from three wild type naïve, antigen unchallenged, Wistar rats. The material was used as template for both an Ig specific 5′RACE PCR and for primer set amplification and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq Next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform.

Analysis of the VH and VLK usage in naïve rat following 5′ RACE showed that VH family 5 was the most represented (39%) followed by family 2 and 1 with 28 and 16% respectively. The other families were all present at a lower frequency (1–4%) while family 12 and 15 were the least represented with a frequency of less than 0.1%. Analysis of VLK usage showed that family 22 and 12 and 1 were the most represented (28%, 20%, 12% of the total VLK usage respectively) while the majority of VLK families were present at similar frequencies between 3 to 5%. Families, 5, 9, 17, 19 and 21 were present at less than 1% and family 7, 13, 18 and 20 were less than 0.1% (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

NGS analysis of the VH and VLK genes in naïve rats. Chord diagram representation of the V and J genes frequency and their respective pairing; analysis of the 5′RACE-amplified cDNA(left) and primer set amplified (right) for VH (a) and VLK (b) genes. The diagrams are color-coded showing the pairing network of the joining regions with each variable gene family, the size of the inner segments correlates with the number of sequences identified for each gene. The frequency of unique CDR3 sequences with different nucleotide lengths in the heavy chain and kappa light chain genes are shown as histograms (c) for both the VH (left) and VLK (right).

In order to determine whether our primer set was able to amplify the rat VH/VLK repertoire in an unbiased fashion, we compared the repertoire from 5′RACE described above with that amplified by our primer set, again in the context of unchallenged naïve rats. The relative frequency of variable heavy (VH) and joining (HJ) genes was similar in both primer and 5′RACE amplified sets (Fig. 1a). In the 5′ RACE amplified dataset 55% of the VH genes were paired with J2 the next most frequently used J region was J3 while a similar proportion of J1 and J4 genes were used. The V-J pairing distribution was maintained after primer set amplification in which J2 remained predominantly used (49%), followed by J3 (33%). Thus, the frequency of the VH family usage was preserved before and after V region specific PCR.

The kappa light chain (VLK) samples were similarly analysed. Here we observed that the V-J pairing pattern was comparable in both 5′RACE and primer set amplified products (Fig. 1b). For example, the VLK22-KJ2 pairing frequency was observed at 55% and 50% in the 5′RACE and primer amplified samples respectively. This again suggested that the PCR amplification using gene specific primers did not bias the repertoire towards specific clones. The general frequency of the usage for each kappa V chain family and J genes did not show differences in the two samples.

The PCR products obtained after V region specific amplifications demonstrated a similar representation of VLK families as the 5′RACE sample. IgVLK7, IgVLK13, IgVLK18, IgVLK20, IgVLK21 were present at low frequency in the pre-PCR sample and were observed at a similar proportion post-amplification with the primer set. A notable omission in the primer set sample was the absence of IgVLK13 which had a low representation in the 5′RACE dataset and a reduction in the frequency of the J4 region in the kappa light chain pairing. The larger proportion of J5-assigned sequences suggest that the J5 reverse primer, which shares homology with J4, may have preferentially amplified this region over the J4. Overall, both the frequency of the gene-usage and the V-J pairing suggest that PCR amplification using this primer set did not skew the rat’s immune repertoire, but enabled generation of V-J products as close as possible to the originally repertoire present in these rats.

As additional confirmation, we have looked at the frequency distribution of unique CDR3 sequences within both the VH and VLK genes in the naïve rat data sets. The percentage unique clones containing CDR3 sequences of different length was almost identical in 5′RACE and primer set amplified genes for both heavy and light chain (Fig. 1c). Gaussian analysis of the data indicated a mean CDR3 length of 14.09 and 13.78 for the heavy chain and 10.87 and 10.94 for the light chain, in 5′RACE and primer amplified data sets respectively (Supplementary Fig. S1). This data supports the lack of bias introduced by the PCR amplification of the variable genes and demonstrates that the overall diversity is faithfully represented with our primer-set.

Generation and selection of an scFv immune phage library from CD160-vaccinated rats

The human CD160 open reading frame was cloned into the pVAC2 expression vector (pVAC2.CD160). Expression was confirmed by transient transfection in HEK293T cells and staining with the commercial BY55 antibody. Three Wistar rats were genetically vaccinated using the plasmid pVAC2 encoding CD160. Twenty-one days post vaccination, serum-conversion was observed in all three rats (Supplementary Fig. S2). CD160 was also cloned into the retroviral vector SFG and SupT1 cells expressing high levels of CD160 were generated (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Pooled cDNA from the three vaccinated rats was used as template with 68 individual PCR reactions (29 for the VH and 39 for VLK primers). Reverse primers for the joining region were used in an equimolar mixture for each individual forward primer PCR reaction. (Supplementary Fig. S4). A notable feature was the presence of the VH family 3 which was sequenced at low frequency (0.4%) from 5′RACE amplicon in naïve rats. In the case of CD160-immunised animals this region was successfully amplified with only one of the two primers designed to anneal to this region (MP20891). After overlap extension PCR, the approximately 800 bp scFv insert was subsequently cloned in the phagemid vector and displayed on the phage surface for biopanning.

We displayed the human GPI-anchored protein CD160 on Strep-Tactin magnetic beads. This facilitated direct capture on to beads from the supernatant of transfected HEK293T cells and convenient elution with biotin (Fig. 2a). To confirm quality of the CD160 protein from the transfected HEK293T, we prepared it to 95% purity, analysed it by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF), and compared it with different sources of CD160 protein (Supplementary Fig. S5). The success of the biopanning process was assessed by flow cytometry staining of the beads at the various stages using an anti-CD160 antibody (Fig. 2b). Three sequential biopanning rounds of the phage-scFv library were conducted using the CD160-Strep-Tactin magnetic beads; enrichment was tested after each round of selection. To increase the likelihood of finding functional binders against the native conformation of the target antigen, we screened individual clones using flow cytometry. Successful enrichment was assessed using IPTG-induced bacterial supernatant to stain CD160 positive SupT1 cells (Fig. 2c). A clear binding of the supernatant was observable in selection rounds 2 and 3, but a small enrichment is also evident in round one, highlighting the presence of specific binders after a single round of phage selection. Screening clones derived from individual bacterial colonies identified 15 unique scFvs that specifically bind CD160 positive cells (Fig. 2d).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Biopanning of the scFv phage display library on Streptactin magnetic beads. (a) Schematic representation of the biopanning process employing the StreptagII-Streptactin system. CD160 fused with Twin streptag was capture directly from cell supernatant on the surface of Streptactin magnetic beads. Phages were incubated with the antigen’ coated beads and bound phages were subsequently recovered by eluting with a 30 mM biotin solution and used to amplify the library for the next biopanning round. (b) The process of coating and elution of the beads throughout the biopanning process was assessed by flow cytometry analysis. These were stained during the several steps of the procedure (coating, blocking with 3%BSA and elution) using commercial anti CD160-PE. (c) Enrichment of the phage library for CD160 was determined after three rounds of biopanning on beads. The bacterial library from the different rounds of selection was induced to express the soluble scFv fragment in the supernatant. This was used to stain SupT1 cells overexpressing human CD160, due to the presence of a myc-tag at the C-terminus of productive scFvs we were able to detect binding using anti myc antibody. 2xTY media + anti myc-tag-DL549 and the commercial anti-CD160-PE Ab were used as controls. (d) The 15 individual bacterial colonies identified in the third round of biopanning carrying unique combination of CDR1,2 and 3 were screened by against SupT1 CD160 positive and negative cells (NT).

Characterization of identified binders revealed high affinity kinetic clones

Alignment of the VH genes to the IMGT database of rat germline variable genes revealed that the 15 unique scFv clones which contained 5 different HCDR3 originating from rearranged germline family V2 and V5. Two of these CDR3s were found to account for 46.67% and 26.67% of the total diversity (Fig. 3a).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Characterization of the monoclonal scFv identified in the biopanning. (a) Alignment to the IMGT database of Rattus norvegicus germline variable sequence showed rearrange sequences originated from family 2 and 5 of the VH genes. We identified five different HCDR3 in which three were represented in multiple clones and three occurring only once. (b) Flow cytometry analysis of the five selected HCDR3 expressed secreted as chimeric scFv fused with mIgG2aFc. Supernatant from transfected HEK293T cells was used to stain SupT1 negative and SupT1 CD160 positive cells; the binding was detected with a secondary anti-mouseIgGFc-PE and anti CD160-PE (BY55) was used as positive control. (c) The affinity of these five scFv was determined using Biacore T200 technology. Individual scFvs were captured on a CM5 chip and CD160 was injected as analyte at 5 different concentration (3.70 nM, 11.11 nM, 33.33, nM, 100 nM and 300 nM) in a single-cycle kinetic study. The double-reference subtracted sensorgrams fitted with the 1:1 Langmuir binding model; kinetic and model fitting data are reported in the table.

Five binders (SC14, C10, C25, C83, C123) carrying unique CDR3s were studied further as recombinant chimeric rat scFv/mouse IgG2aFc antibodies. Flow cytometric analysis determined that the recombinant antibodies selectively bound cell lines engineered to express CD160 (Fig. 3b).

The kinetic profile of the scFvs was studied by SPR using purified CD160 as the analyte. We found a range of high affinity scFvs (Fig. 3c). SC14, C25 and C123 were the highest affinity with KD values of 0.399, 0.869 and 0.206 nM respectively. These clones all exhibited rapid association and slow dissociation kinetics as expected for high affinity binding antibodies, (ka = 1.8–5.4 × 105, kd = 2.53 × 10–4–7.50 × 10–5). The KD values of clones C10 and C83 were 233 nM and 1.051 nM. Clone C83 demonstrated a rapid association (ka 9.65 × 105) and intermediate dissociation rate (kd = 1.01 × 10–3). Interestingly, despite C10 and C83 showing equivalent binding in flow cytometry experiments, clone C10 demonstrated a very rapid dissociation rate (kd = 0.1269) and the binding was likely compensated by a rapid association rate (ka = 5.44 × 105). The range of kinetics observed in the clones suggest that the binders selected from the library will have utility in a wide range of applications.

CAR engineered T cells were functional and able to specifically kill CD160 positive cells

We next sought to demonstrate the therapeutic potential of CD160 binders. For this we converted the 5 different CD160 scFvs into CAR format. A third generation CAR construct with CD28 and OX40 costimulatory endodomains20 and with a CD8STK as spacer moiety21 was selected as the format for CAR comparison.

Normal donor, peripheral blood T cells were transduced to express CAR constructs using gamma retroviral vectors. Transduced T cells were then co-cultured at different effector to target ratios (E:T) with either SupT1 cells (which do not express CD160) and SupT1 cells engineered to express CD160. One day post co-culture we observed already a drastic control in the growth of the SupT1 cells expressing CD160, with complete killing of the CD160 target cells by 72 h (Fig. 4a) at all the E:T tested. Furthermore, the 5 different CARs showed no non-specific killing with complete recovery of the NT target cells at both time point.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Functional assays as chimeric antigen receptor. Four different healthy donors PBMCs were transduced with lentivirus to express the five different scFvs fused in a third generation (CD28-OX40ζ) CAR structure and tested in a cytotoxic assay. T cells were incubated with SupT1 CD160 positive and negative cells (NT) at different effector to target ratio (1:2, 1:4 and 1:8). The residual number of target cells for each donor was normalized against non-engineered PBMCs and all the five CARs demonstrated excellent killing at both 24 h and 72 h (a). Total cytokine production was assessed at 72 h and showed high levels of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and IL-2 (b) with no background on target-negative cells. The mean from each donor was plotted individually and analysed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test for comparison between CARs within the same target group. ***p < 0.0001.

The 5 different CD160 CARs were further evaluated for the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and Interleukin-2 (IL-2) at 72 h. All CARs tested showed high levels of cytokine production (Fig. 4b). No background cytokine release was observed to SupT1 cells. No differences were observed at any of the effector to target ratio tested, suggesting equal potency of all CARs generated. An interesting feature of all CARs tested was the high levels of IL2 secretion observed. This particular feature could be beneficial in the improvement of CAR T cells persistence in vivo.

Discussion

Phage display has been successful in generating a large number of antibodies used in a variety of application including therapeutics22. Immune phage libraries combine advantages of both phage display and hybridoma technology. The in vivo selective expansion of high affinity B cell clones after immunization allows use of a small phage library and typically, multiple high affinity binders can be identified after limited rounds of bio-panning23,24.

Immune libraries are typically derived from mice whose immune repertoire has been exhaustively studied25. Rats are rarely used for construction of such phage libraries, despite having advantages over mice as a host species to generate antibodies. For example, the propensity of rats to undergo rapid serum-conversion typically means that fewer animals need to be vaccinated7. Furthermore, being larger than mice, a tenfold greater amount of serum can typically be extracted, and larger secondary lymphoid organs allow the isolation of a greater number of lymphoid tissues. The use of rats as vaccination host results in non-cross-reactive antibodies and species-specific epitopes, distinct from those raised in mice2628.

Primers designed for the amplification of mouse immunoglobulins29,30 have been successfully applied for the generation of scFv based phage libraries from immunized sources31,32. However, few primer sets that specifically amplify immunoglobulin variable regions from rats have been described. In 2008, Sepulveda and Shoemaker6 compared rat EST sequences and mouse VL/VH coding sequences and designed a primer set which amplifies 65 heavy and 77 light chains-predicted variable domains. From the curated IMGT database, we currently know that in spite of the close similarity to mouse, rats have a very high number of functional variable genes in the genome (232 VH and 164VLK) with IGVH1, IGVH2 and IGVH533 being the most abundant families. Sepulveda’s primer set only covers family 1 and 2, lacking coverage of the highly abundant family IGVH5 and other families such as IGVH8 and IGVH11. The Sepulveda primer set covers only IGVLK-IGVLK6 families, which is only a small proportion of possible Kappa light chain variable sequences.

In order to expand the possibilities of using phage display-based methods for antibody discovery from immunized rats, we have utilised the curated IMGT database to design a set of primers that covers all currently known VH and VLK germline sequences in rats16. We used two strategies to exploit the similarity shared within each family at the start of the VH genes to minimize the numbers of primers: First, we incorporated up to 3 ambiguous nucleotides in each primer and secondly, we incorporated LNAs to shorten primers within highly homologous regions. This allowed us to cover all the families with a small number of primers (29 for VH and 39 for VLK) while fully covering the most represented families, such as IGVH1, IGVH2 and IGVH533. Indeed, these were the most expressed families in rats as shown by NGS, confirming that the design of the primer set specifically captures the diversity of rat’s immunoglobulins response.

Because the rat’s immunoglobulin repertoire is relatively unstudied, we first used NGS sequencing to investigate the family’s usage in rats. This confirmed the IMGT annotation33 with family 5 being the most represented VH family followed by an equal frequency of family 1 and 2, while for VLK we identified family 22 and 12 as the most commonly used genes in naïve rats. We compared these data with NGS of pooled VH and VLK amplified with our primer set to determine if our primer library resulted in any bias. Families containing fewer subgroups were also identified at lower frequencies and were covered proportionally in both the data sets. A similar profile of J region associated with each VH gene also confirms lack of bias introduced by the PCR with our primer set. Finally. the analysis of the CDR3 distribution in both the 5′RACE and primer set-amplified products demonstrated an almost identical pattern of diverse CDR3 length in both the VH and VLK genes, again confirming faithful amplification.

To validate the performance of the primer set we used CD160 as a test antigen for the generation of a rat immune library. CD160 is a small protein expressed either as a GPI-anchored protein, with physiological expression restricted to NK cells and a subset of T cells. CD160 is a promising target for a number of clinical applications. The protein is expressed in neovasculature13, and has the potential to be used for vasculature targeting. It has been found in exhausted HIV-specific CD8+ T cells34 and aberrantly expressed on B cell lymphoproliferative disorders14.

We generated a phage display immune library for human CD160 from DNA immunized rats. We selected the immune phage display library with CD160 fused to the Strep-tag II peptide at the carboxy-terminus of the antigen. This construct facilitated direct capture to magnetic beads from the supernatant of transfected cells, avoiding the necessity of purification, biotinylation or passive absorption of the target molecule. Further, exploiting the higher affinity of biotin to Strep-Tactin compared with Strep-tag II, the addition of biotin allowed the gentle desorbing on phage from the beads through competitive elution. Sequence analysis identified fifteen unique scFvs with five different HCDR3 from either family 2 or 5 of the rat germline VH genes. Furthermore, characterisation of the obtained binders showed specific binding to the target with binding affinities from the mid-nanomolar to picomolar range.

CAR T cells have demonstrated success in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies targeting CD19, and more recently BCMA35,36. To demonstrate the utility of the discovered scFv, we derived CARs from 5 of the scFv with unique HCDR3. Primary human T cells engineered to express these CARs showed specific cytokine release and cytotoxicity and in response to cells expressing CD160. Interestingly, there was limited difference in the cytotoxic capacity or secretion of cytokine despite measurable differences in the binding affinities of the different binders.

Here, we describe a method of antibody isolation using phage display libraries based on a novel set of primers which amplifies the entire rat variable VH and VLK repertoires. We demonstrated the utility of such libraries in combination with genetic immunization and a simple display technique to generate antibodies, with a range of affinities to the target CD160. We anticipate this primer set will be of use in generating immune libraries from rats, in addition to other applications such as single B-cell antibody discovery methods. Finally, we hope that the overall methodology described here, combining immunization and panning strategy, opens up rapid and simple antibody discovery to laboratories with limited experience and resources for antibody engineering for CAR T and other applications.

Materials and methods

Rat immunizations, RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Three adult Wistar rats were immunized with the target human CD160 (accession number: NM_007053.3). Genetic vaccinations were carried out using DNA encoding coated gold nanoparticles at Aldevron, GmBH. Briefly, the gene coding for human CD160 was cloned into a pVAC2 vector for the rats vaccination. A GeneGun system was used to deliver plasmid coated gold nanoparticles intramuscularly. Homogenized lymph nodes and spleens from the vaccinated animals were preserved in RNA later (QIAGEN). RNA was extracted from 7 × 106 lymph node cells using RNAeasy kit (QIAGEN). RNA from multiple aliquots of cells was pooled together for downstream RT-PCR. The cDNA reaction was performed with 7 µg of RNA using QuantiTect Reverse Transcription kit (QIAGEN). The success of the reaction and potential genomic contamination was assessed by PCR amplification followed by gel electrophoresis of the housekeeping gene GAPDH using a 1:5 working dilution of the cDNA.

All animals were used under protocols approved by UCL Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWERB) and authorization granted by the UK Home Office under the Animal Scientific Procedures Act 1986 (licence number: 12570).

5′ RACE amplication of Ig genes naïve rats

Three 8–10-week-old wild-type Wistar rats (2 female and 1 male) were purchased from Charles River, UK. The animals were sacrificed and RNA extracted from homogenised spleens. Applying the Simple Method for Amplifying RNA Targets (SMART)37, Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) was used to generate cDNA; the reaction was primed to incorporate a specific tail for subsequent PCR. The resulting cDNA from each animal was then pooled and used to amplify the total VH and VLK gene set. The PCR was performed at 68 °C using KOD polymerase (Thermo Scientific) and a forward primer (5-cgacgtggactatccatgaacgca-3′) specific for the tail in the cDNA with a reverse primer specific for either the CH1 portion of the rat IgG’s constant region (5-ccagactgcaggacagctgg-3′) or the kappa constant region (5′-atgatgtcttatgaacaacctcacaggtatagag-3′). Successful amplification was confirmed on an agarose gel by the presence of product between 600 and 700 bp. The DNA was subsequently purified by ethanol precipitation and resuspended in 20 μl of nuclease-free dH20. The amplified fragments for VH and VLK chains were used for NGS sequencing.

NGS sequencing and analysis

The total pool of VH and VLK products were sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq platform with 2 × 300 bp paired-end configuration (GENEWIZ). A quality FASTAQ report was delivered and used as input files in sequence reconstruction. The software for adaptative immune profiling MiXCR38 was employed to overlap the paired-end sequencing and the rat’s germline database obtained from IgBlast39 was used as reference sequences for the alignment of the V, D and J segments. Output of each processing stage was converted to tab-delimited text files for manual inspection. Gene segments were identified using IMGT’s nomenclature, including functional and open reading frame-defined gene segments. All productive VH and VLK segments were analysed and the percentage of usage was determined by dividing sequencing reads corresponding to each gene segment by the total number of gene segments. V(D)J pairing was only assessed from productive VH and VLK segments. Undetermined or unproductive sequences were excluded. Total counts from V-J pairings for heavy- and light-chains were tabulated and chord diagrams were generated using Circos Online40.

Amplification of VH and VLK chains

The primary amplification of the two variable chains was performed with oligonucleotides designed on the Rattus norvegicus germline sequences of heavy variable chain (VH) and kappa light chain (VLK) genes; primers were designed to have the annealing portion with a melting temperature around 60 °C (Table 1). A PCR master mix was prepared using High Fidelity Phusion polymerase and buffer (NEB) in a 50 µl reaction with 1 µl of a 25 nM working dilution of each primer and 1 µl of the cDNA pool. An individual reaction for each forward primer containing 1 µl of an equimolar pooled mix of the reverse primers was performed. The samples were heated at 98 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 98 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for 40 s with a 10 min final extension at 72 °C. Each product at approximately 400 bp was purified from the agarose gel.

Overlap extension PCR

The amplified primary PCR products of VH and VL were pooled together for the overlap extension reaction. The outer primers were design to anneal 5′ end of the VH gene and the 3′ end of the VL gene for fusing into scFv format linked by a (Gly4Ser)3 repeats as linker. The reaction mixture was amplified as above using 100 ng of each pool. After the initial denaturation for 2 min at 98 °C the PCR was cycled as follows: 98 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 40 s and 72 °C for 1 min with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR product was run on agarose gel and the 800 bp band was extracted and purified using QIAquick PCR clean up kit (QIAGEN). The reaction was scaled up for the subsequent enzymatic digestion.

Generation of the scFv library

1 µg of purified fused product was digested with SfiI and NotI restriction enzymes (NEB) and cloned in to the phagemid vector pHEN1. The generated ligation mixture of plasmid DNA was cleaned-up by ethanol precipitation and re-suspended in 80 µl of dH2O prior to the electroporation into TG1 E. coli bacteria (MicroPulser, Bio-Rad). The transformed bacteria were recovered in 2xTY medium at 37 °C shaking at 225 rpm for 1 h before spreading on a Bio-Assay Dish (Fisher Scientific) containing 200 ml of 2xTY-agar, 100 µg/ml ampicillin and 1% glucose (w/v). Following overnight incubation, the dish was harvested and the library re-suspended in 10 ml of 2xTY and 15% glycerol (v/v) for storage in 500 µl aliquots at − 80 °C. The successful generation and estimation of the library size was performed by counting the colonies plated on serially diluted 2xTY-agar/Amp/Gluc petri-dishes; a number of single colonies were grown in liquid culture and the plasmid DNA was screened by colony PCR using M13 primers that generated a ~ 1000 bp DNA in the presence of the full-length scFv insert (~ 800 bp). The library glycerol stock was then used to inoculate the starting culture of the phage production for the first biopanning round.

Phage production

To produce phage-scFv particles for the biopanning steps, a 2xTY/Amp/Gluc starting culture (OD600nm: 0.1) was inoculated with the library glycerol stock and grown to OD600nm: 0.4–0.5, before infection with 100 µl of M13KO17 helper phage (NEB) followed by incubation for 40 min at 37 °C without shaking. The bacteria were then centrifuged and re-suspended in 100 ml 2xTY containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin, 50 µg/mL kanamycin without glucose overnight at 30 °C shaking at 225 rpm.

Next day, the culture was centrifuged at 3300×g for 20 min at 4 °C to remove bacterial cells, 18 ml of ice-cold 20% PEG-6000/2.5 M NaCl was added to the phage-containing supernatant and the solution was incubated 4 °C for 1 h. After centrifugation at 3300×g for 20 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was discarded and the phage-containing pellet was re-suspended in 1.5 ml of dH2O. The solution was then centrifuged at ≥ 14,000×g in a microfuge for 5 min to pellet any remaining bacterial cells and the supernatant was transferred into a clean 1.7 ml tube. 0.25 ml of ice-cold 20% PEG-6000/2.5 M NaCl added, the solution was incubated at 4 °C for 1 h then centrifuged at ≥ 14,000×g for 10 min; the supernatant was discarded and the final phage pellet was re-suspended in 1 ml of dH2O. To assess the titre of phage particles, 10 µl were kept aside for E. coli infection and the remaining solution was divided into two ~ 500 µl aliquots which were blocked with 1 ml of PBS, 4% BSA (w/v) for 1 h at room temperature and subsequently used for the rounds of biopanning.

SDS-PAGE

CD160-containing supernatant from HEK293T cells and mouse IgG2a Fc purified protein were run by SDS-PAGE alongside a purified commercial source of CD160-His (Sino Biological). 1 µg of purified protein or 5 µl of supernatant were run on to a TGX 4–20% gel according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Bio-Rad). Samples were prepared as follows: 5 µL of sample loading buffer, 2 µL of reducing buffer (not included under non-reducing conditions), made up to 20 µL final volume with PBS. Following SDS-PAGE, the gel was covered with Coomassie R-250 stain solution (Sigma-Aldrich) and stained for 60 min with gentle agitation on a rotating plate shaker. Staining solution was decanted and the gel was destained (dH2O, methanol, and acetic acid in a ratio of 50/40/10 (v/v/v)) until the protein bands became visible. Images of the proteins gel were acquired using QuantStudio imager (GE Lifesciences).

Differential scanning fluorimetry

Protein stability was analysed on a Prometheus NT.48 (NanoTemper Technologies GmbH, Munich, Germany) as previously described41.

ELISA

Antigens (CD160-Fc HEK supernatant 1:10 dilution; CD160-Fc HEK purified 1 µg/ml, 0.5 µg/ml, 0.25 µg/ml; CD160-Fc CHO purified 1ug/ml, 0.5 µg/ml, 0.25 µg/ml; CD160-His Sino biologicals) were coated in Nunc Maxisorp plates in coating buffer (Biologend, 50 μl/well) O/N at 4C. Plate were washed four times with PBS 0.05% Tween20, and blocked in 2% BSA (200 µl) for 1 h at RT. Primary antibody (BY55-humanFc HEK supernatant) was incubated with 1:3 serial dilutions in PBS 0.5% BSA for 1 h at RT. Plates washed in PBS 0.05% Tween20 4 times and incubated with anti-human HRP (Jackson Immunotools) at 1:3000 dilutions in PBS 0.5% BSA for 1 h at RT. Plates washed four times with PBS 0.05% Tween20, developed using one step TMB ultra (Thermo) 45 μl and stopped with 1 M H2SO4 45 µl. The absorbance of the plate was read at 450 nm and used to determine the EC50 of the different formats of CD160 protein.

Biopanning on magnetic beads

The biopanning rounds were performed using Strep-Tactin type II (IBA Lifesciences) magnetic beads coated with the target of interest. Human CD160 was genetically engineered to be fused with a mouse IgG Fc and a Strep-tagII (WSHPQFEKGGGSGGGSGGSAWSHPQFEK) and cloned as a secreted protein into a SFG expression plasmid as described elsewhere42. HEK293T cells cultured in complete DMEM medium (Gibco) were transfected with 12.5 µg plasmid DNA using GeneJuice transfection reagent (MerckMillipore). After 48 h, the cell supernatant was harvested and 0.2 µm filtered prior to the coating of magnetic beads. 5 µl of beads suspension were incubated with 1.5 ml of filtered cell supernatant for 1 h at room temperature shaking. Supernatant from non-transfected HEK293T cells was used to coat magnetic beads as a negative control during phage selection. The beads were magnetized and washed three times with PBS. The presence of CD160-mIgGFc-Strep-tag II fusion protein on the beads was assessed by flow cytometry of a representative aliquot of NT-supernatant coated beads and CD160-coated beads stained with anti-CD160 antibody (BY55-PE, BD Pharmigen). 20 µl of beads coated with NT-supernatant and CD160-supernatant were respectively incubated with the blocked phage particles for 1 h at room temperature shaking. The bead-phage complex was magnetized and washed five times with PBS 0.1% Tween20 and five times with PBS. Phage particles were eluted from the beads by re-suspending the washed beads in 1.5 ml of DMEM 30 mM biotin and incubating for 2 h at room temperature shaking. The beads were removed using a magnet and the supernatant used to infect a 10 ml culture of TG1 E. coli grown to OD600nm: 0.4–0.5 in 2xTY medium. Every aliquot of bacteria infected with phage was split; a portion was serially diluted and plated on 2xTY-agar/Amp/Gluc plates to assess phage titre. The remaining bacteria were spread on a Bio-Assay dish for the generation of the bacteria glycerol stock for the next round of biopanning, as described in the previous section.

Screening of phage display scFv library

Individual colonies plated on 2xTY-agar/Amp/Gluc from the glycerol stock of the previous round of biopanning were grown in 4 ml of 2xTY/Amp/Gluc liquid culture and the plasmid purified with the Qiagen miniprep kit. Approximately 300 ng of extracted DNA from each colony was screened on agarose gel after SfiI and NotI restriction digestion.

Expression of soluble scFv from positive bacteria colonies was obtained by re-suspending 1 ml of an overnight single colony culture into 1 ml of 2xTY, 100 µg/ml ampicillin and 1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and cultured at 30 °C for further 16 h shaking at 225 rpm.

SupT1 cells were engineered to overexpress the human transmembrane protein CD160 and after centrifugation at 3300×g for 10 min, 200 µl of the induced bacteria supernatant was used as primary antibody for staining 105 CD160 positive supT1 cells followed by 1 µl of anti c-myc-DyLight549 (9E10, Bio-Rad). Cells were acquired on a BD Fortessa x20II flow cytometer. Anti CD160 antibody (BY55-PE, BD Pharmigen) was used as positive control and either induced bacteria supernatant from previous round of biopanning or 2xTY medium as negative control for the staining. Positive clones were subsequently cloned in to an SFG plasmid as secreted scFv fused to mouse IgG2a Fc and transfected in HEK293T cells for transient protein production. Specific binding of the produced scFv supernatant was assessed on CD160 positive and negative supT1 cells stained with 1 μl of anti-mouse-IgG-PE (Jackson Laboratories).

Affinity measurement

The binding kinetic of the selected scFvs were studied at 25 °C by SPR technology using a Biacore T200 machine. Supernatant from HEK293T cells transfected with different anti CD160 scFv-mIG2aFc was harvested at 48 h and immobilized on a CM5 sensor chip using a mouse antibody capture kit (GE, healthcare). The purified CD160 analyte (Sino Biological) was dialysed against the experimental running buffer HBS-EP + (GE, healthcare) prior to use. All steps were performed at a flow rate of 30 μL/min and the analyte was injected in a single-cycle kinetic mode at five different concentration (3.7 nM, 11.11 nM, 33.33 nM, 100 nM and 300 nM). The binding data were double-referenced using the interspots (representing unmodified chip surface) and the in-line buffer blank (“0 nM CD160” injection). The double-referenced sensorgrams were locally fit using the 1:1 Langmuir binding model for the extrapolation of Ka (on rate), Kd (off rate) and KD (affinity), using the BiaEvaluation software Version 3.0.

Cytotoxicity and cytokine release assay

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from 4 healthy donors leucocyte cones (NHSBT) by Ficoll (Sigma-Aldrich) density centrifugation using SepMate PBMC Isolation tube (STEMCELL). VSV-G-pseudotyped lentivirus encoding the chimeric antigen receptors were produced in HEK293T cells by transient transfection with a 1:2:4 ratio respectively of plasmids encoding for VSV-G envelope (pMD2.G, Addgene #12259), gag-pol (gift of Elio Vanin, Baylor College of Medicine) and the transfer vector.

Before transduction, T cells were depleted of CD56-expressing NK cells using EasySep human CD56 Positive Selection Kit II (STEMCELL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PBMCs were transduced 72 h after stimulation with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 antibodies (Miltenyi) and 100 U/mL human IL-2 (GeneScript) and cultured in complete media RPMI1640, 1% glutamax and 10% FCS. The cells were transduced on retronectin (Takara) coated 6-well plates at 1.2 × 106 cells/well in complete RPMI1640 media, 100 U/mL human IL-2, 4 mL of lentiviral supernatant and were spun at 1000 g for 40 min.

5 × 104 SupT1 wild-type (NT) or SupT1 CD160-positive cells were used as target cells and co-cultured with CAR-engineered T cells to achieve an effector:target ratio of 1:2, 1:4 and 1:8 in 200 μL of complete media. CAR-mediated cytotoxicity was assessed by flow cytometry at 24 h and 72 h timepoints. T cells were identified from target cells by staining for human CD3 (UCHT1, Biolegend) and human CD2 (RPA-2.1, Biolegend) and target cells were gated by their lack of huCD3 and huCD2 expression. Viability was assessed with live/dead cell exclusion dye eFluor780 (Thermo Scientific). Viable target cells were enumerated for each co-culture condition by acquiring a fixed amount of counting-beads (CountBright, Thermo Scientific) and the percentage cytotoxicity was calculated by normalising the number of viable target cells to that recovered from co-cultures carried out with non-transduced T cells.

Supernatants from the 72 h timepoint were harvested and used to measure the total amount of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and IL-2 produced. Cytokine concentrations were measured using human IFN-γ ELISA MAX kit (Biolegend) and human IL2 ELISA MAX kit (Biolegend) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test for comparison between CARs within the same target group. *p < 0.1, **p < 0.001 and ***p < 0.0001.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures. (766.5KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table S1. (20.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table S2. (18.2KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

MP is supported by the University College London Hospital Biomedical Research Centre funded by the UK National Institute of Health Research. This work was funded by CRUK (515707).

Author contributions

M.P., F.D. and K.C. designed the primers. M.P. and F.N. devised the panning strategy. F.N. analysed sequences and performed Biacore. F.N. performed the experiments. LM prepared and tested the rat vaccination. Y.B. and B.M. performed primer validation. M.R. and J.Y. helped with the phage library generation. F.P. and P.W. helped with the phage display selection. M.F. performed the protein quality experiments. S.O., C.R., K.C. and M.P. supervised the study, contributed to scientific discussion, data interpretation and manuscript preparation. M.P. and F.N. wrote the manuscript. K.C. introduced the rat immunization concept, provided experimental protocols and contributed to the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Kerry Chester and Martin Pule.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-76069-3.

References

  • 1.Bazan J, Całkosiński I, Gamian A. Phage display—A powerful technique for immunotherapy: 1. Introduction and potential of therapeutic applications. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2012;8:1817–1828. doi: 10.4161/hv.21703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rossant CJ, et al. Phage display and hybridoma generation of antibodies to human CXCR2 yields antibodies with distinct mechanisms and epitopes. mAbs. 2014;6:1425–1438. doi: 10.4161/mabs.34376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Winter G, Griffiths AD, Hawkins RE, Hoogenboom HR. Making antibodies by phage display technology. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1994;12:433–455. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.002245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nguyen TTH, Lee JS, Shim H. Construction of rabbit immune antibody libraries. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ. 2018;1701:133–146. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7447-4_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang Z, et al. Universal PCR amplification of mouse immunoglobulin gene variable regions: The design of degenerate primers and an assessment of the effect of DNA polymerase 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity. J. Immunol. Methods. 2000;233:167–177. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(99)00184-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sepulveda J, Shoemaker CB. Design and testing of PCR primers for the construction of scFv libraries representing the immunoglobulin repertoire of rats. J. Immunol. Methods. 2008;332:92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Osaki T, et al. Generation and characterization of rat monoclonal antibodies against epidermal growth factor receptor. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2015;34:418–422. doi: 10.1089/mab.2015.0034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Singh V, Gupta D, Almasan A. Development of novel anti-Cd20 monoclonal antibodies and modulation in Cd20 levels on cell surface: Looking to improve immunotherapy response. J. Cancer Sci. Ther. 2015;7:347–358. doi: 10.4172/1948-5956.1000373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Holgate RGE, Weldon R, Jones TD, Baker MP. Characterisation of a novel anti-CD52 antibody with improved efficacy and reduced immunogenicity. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0138123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu FT, et al. CD160 signaling mediates PI3K-dependent survival and growth signals in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2010;115:3079–3088. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-239483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schnorfeil FM, et al. T cells are functionally not impaired in AML: Increased PD-1 expression is only seen at time of relapse and correlates with a shift towards the memory T cell compartment. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2015;8:93. doi: 10.1186/s13045-015-0189-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Giustiniani J, Bensussan A, Marie-Cardine A. Identification and characterization of a transmembrane isoform of CD160 (CD160-TM), a unique activating receptor selectively expressed upon human NK cell activation. J. Immunol. 2009;182:63–71. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chabot S, et al. A novel antiangiogenic and vascular normalization therapy targeted against human CD160 receptor. J. Exp. Med. 2011;208:973–986. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Farren TW, et al. Differential and tumor-specific expression of CD160 in B-cell malignancies. Blood. 2011;118:2174–2183. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-334326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Farren TW, et al. Minimal residual disease detection with tumor-specific CD160 correlates with event-free survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e273. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2014.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alamyar E, Duroux P, Lefranc M-P, Giudicelli V. IMGT tools for the nucleotide analysis of immunoglobulin (IG) and T cell receptor (TR) V-(D)-J repertoires, polymorphisms, and IG mutations: IMGT/V-QUEST and IMGT/HighV-QUEST for NGS. In: Christiansen FT, Tait BD, editors. Immunogenetics. Totowa: Humana Press; 2012. pp. 569–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haughton G, Lanier LL, Babcock GF. The murine kappa light chain shift. Nature. 1978;275:154–157. doi: 10.1038/275154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koshkin AA, et al. LNA (locked nucleic acid): An RNA mimic forming exceedingly stable LNA:LNA duplexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998;120:13252–13253. doi: 10.1021/ja9822862. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hoogenboom HR, et al. Multi-subunit proteins on the surface of filamentous phage: Methodologies for displaying antibody (Fab) heavy and light chains. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:4133–4137. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.15.4133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pulè MA, et al. A chimeric T cell antigen receptor that augments cytokine release and supports clonal expansion of primary human T cells. Mol. Ther. J. Am. Soc. Gene Ther. 2005;12:933–941. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Campana D, Schwarz H, Imai C. 4–1BB chimeric antigen receptors. Cancer J. Sudbury Mass. 2014;20:134–140. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Frenzel A, Schirrmann T, Hust M. Phage display-derived human antibodies in clinical development and therapy. mAbs. 2016;8:1177–1194. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1212149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lim TS, Chan SK. Immune antibody libraries: Manipulating the diverse immune repertoire for antibody discovery. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016;22:6480–6489. doi: 10.2174/1381612822666160923111924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schofield DJ, et al. Application of phage display to high throughput antibody generation and characterization. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R254. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-11-r254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rettig TA, Ward C, Bye BA, Pecaut MJ, Chapes SK. Characterization of the naive murine antibody repertoire using unamplified high-throughput sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0190982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ben-Barak Y, Russell JT, Whitnall M, Ozato K, Gainer H. Phylogenetic cross-reactivities of monoclonal antibodies produced against rat neurophysin. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 1984;4:339–349. doi: 10.1007/BF00733596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jost KL, et al. Generation and characterization of rat and mouse monoclonal antibodies specific for MeCP2 and their use in X-inactivation studies. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e26499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yamada S, Itai S, Kaneko MK, Konnai S, Kato Y. Epitope mapping of anti-mouse podoplanin monoclonal antibody PMab-1. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2018;15:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2018.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schaefer JV, Honegger A, Plückthun A. Construction of scFv fragments from hybridoma or spleen cells by PCR assembly. In: Kontermann R, Dübel S, editors. Antibody Engineering. Berlin: Springer; 2010. pp. 21–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Krebber A, et al. Reliable cloning of functional antibody variable domains from hybridomas and spleen cell repertoires employing a reengineered phage display system. J. Immunol. Methods. 1997;201:35–55. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1759(96)00208-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bialon M, et al. Cloning murine antibody V-genes with non-degenerate primers and conversion to a recombinant antibody format. Monoclon. Antibodies Immunodiagn. Immunother. 2014;33:369–377. doi: 10.1089/mab.2014.0044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cheng M, et al. Construction and characterization of single-chain variable fragment antibody library derived from germline rearranged immunoglobulin variable genes. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hendricks J, et al. Organization of the variable region of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene locus of the rat. Immunogenetics. 2010;62:479–486. doi: 10.1007/s00251-010-0448-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chibueze CE, Yoshimitsu M, Arima N. CD160 expression defines a uniquely exhausted subset of T lymphocytes in HTLV-1 infection. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014;453:379–384. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.09.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.June CH, O’Connor RS, Kawalekar OU, Ghassemi S, Milone MC. CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Science. 2018;359:1361–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Scarfò I, Maus MV. Current approaches to increase CAR T cell potency in solid tumors: Targeting the tumor microenvironment. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2017;5:28. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0230-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McCalla SE, et al. A simple method for amplifying RNA targets (SMART) J. Mol. Diagn. JMD. 2012;14:328–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bolotin DA, et al. MiXCR: Software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:380–381. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ye J, Ma N, Madden TL, Ostell JM. IgBLAST: An immunoglobulin variable domain sequence analysis tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W34–40. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Krzywinski MI, et al. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009 doi: 10.1101/gr.092759.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ghorashian S, et al. Enhanced CAR T cell expansion and prolonged persistence in pediatric patients with ALL treated with a low-affinity CD19 CAR. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1408–1414. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0549-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brewin J, et al. Generation of EBV-specific cytotoxic T cells that are resistant to calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease. Blood. 2009;114:4792–4803. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-228387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures. (766.5KB, pdf)
Supplementary Table S1. (20.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Table S2. (18.2KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES