Correction to: Archives of Toxicology 10.1007/s00204-020-02792-5
In the original publication of the article, Table 3 has been published with an error. The red mark-ups were not changed to black color.
The correct Table 3 is given in this correction.
Table 3.
Statistical significance of concentration responses relative to all performed experiments excluding ETC inhibition specificity assay
Significance levels were calculated comparing treatment responses to assay’s specific control using one way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett’s test, *p < 0.05. Light grey = chemical not tested in particular assay, dark grey = not enough replicates to perform statistics. The numbers correspond to the used concentrations in µM: a = 0.000128, b = 0.0064, c = 0.0032, d = 0.016, e = 0.08, f = 0.4, g = 7 and h = 10
The original article has been updated.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Wanda van der Stel, Email: w.van.der.stel@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl.
Giada Carta, Email: g.carta@vu.nl.
Julie Eakins, Email: j.eakins@cyprotex.com.
Salihanur Darici, Email: Salihanur.Darici@glasgow.ac.uk.
Johannes Delp, Email: johannes.delp@uni-konstanz.de.
Anna Forsby, Email: anna.forsby@dbb.su.se.
Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Email: shobe@food.dtu.dk.
Iain Gardner, Email: iain.gardner@certara.com.
Marcel Leist, Email: marcel.leist@uni-konstanz.de.
Erik H. J. Danen, Email: e.danen@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl
Paul Walker, Email: P.Walker@cyprotex.com.
Bob van de Water, Email: water_b@lacdr.leidenuniv.nl.
Paul Jennings, Email: p.jennings@vu.nl.