Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Nov 5;9(45):e00755-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00755-20

Complete Genome Sequence of Serratia marcescens FY, Isolated from Drosophila melanogaster

Wei Liu a,b,, Ruxue Kang b, Kah Leong Lim a,c, Eng King Tan a,c,
Editor: Vincent Brunod
PMCID: PMC7645654  PMID: 33153999

In nature, the fruit fly frequently encounters various pathogens that cause a decrease in host fitness. Here, we present the genome sequence of Serratia marcescens strain FY that was isolated from the intestines of a Drosophila sp. specimen. The complete genome sequence comprises one chromosome of 5,074,453 bp and two plasmids of 100,934 bp and 87,789 bp. A total of 4,891 coding sequences are predicted from this assembly.

ABSTRACT

In nature, the fruit fly frequently encounters various pathogens that cause a decrease in host fitness. Here, we present the genome sequence of Serratia marcescens strain FY, which was isolated from the intestines of a Drosophila specimen. The complete genome sequence comprises one chromosome of 5,074,453 bp and two plasmids of 100,934 bp and 87,789 bp. A total of 4,891 coding sequences are predicted from this assembly.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Serratia marcescens is an opportunistic, Gram-negative bacterium belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae (1). S. marcescens has been reported to infect other animals, including some insects (2, 3). S. marcescens was selected as a model to investigate how the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, handles invasive pathogens (4 6). Here, we report the complete genome sequence of S. marcescens FY, isolated from D. melanogaster.

This isolate was recovered from the midguts of D. melanogaster specimens captured in the orchard (lat 37.265454, long 111.787759). The diluted lysate of homogenized guts was plated onto LB agar medium, and the medium was incubated for 2 days under aerobic conditions at 28°C. Single colonies were serially streaked twice for purification, and an individual colony was finally picked into LB broth for growth and stored in LB broth with 15% glycerol at −20°C. Total DNA was extracted using the DNeasy PowerLyzer PowerSoil kit (Qiagen) (7). The quantity of DNA was examined with a NanoDrop 2000 instrument, and the DNA was sent to Beijing Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Genomic DNA was sheared into the desired fragment size using a g-TUBE device (Covaris). Library preparation was performed with a SMRTbell template kit v3.0 (Pacific Biosciences). Fragments of the template smaller than 20 kbp were removed using the BluePippin size selection system v10 (Sage Science), and the constructed library was validated using a Bioanalyzer 2100 instrument (Agilent Technologies). The SMRTbell library was sequenced using PacBio single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing with C4 chemistry on the PacBio RS II platform. SMRT Analysis v2.3.0 (Pacific Biosciences) was used to perform demultiplexing, base calling, and quality filtering of the raw read sequences, and de novo assembly was conducted according to the RS Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process (HGAP) v3.0 workflow (8). Subsequently, Circlator v1.5.5 was used to ensure circularization of the chromosome by trimming overlapping ends and rotating to the start of the dnaA gene (9). After filtering 151,653 subreads, we retained a pool of 1,427,584,714 bp from 151,212 long reads with an N 50 value of 10,621 bp, yielding 223-fold genome coverage. Gene predictions and annotations were provided by NCBI using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (10). The SEED subsystem was used via Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) for functional categorization of the predicted proteins (11). Default software parameters were used except where otherwise noted.

The complete genome of S. marcescens FY contains one circular chromosome and two circular plasmids, named Plas1 and Plas2. The chromosomal genome assembly was 5,543,750 bp, with a G+C content of 59.7%. The genomic sequence from nucleotide positions 4618264 to 4619794 encodes 16S rRNAs and displays 99.8% (identities, 1,528/1,531) similarity with a published 16S rRNA gene sequence of S. marcescens (12). The plasmid assemblies were 100,934 bp (G+C content, 54.7%) and 87,789 bp (G+C content, 53.2%), respectively. The genome annotation was completed by submission to the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP) to obtain a total of 4,891 predicted genes, 22 rRNAs, 89 tRNAs, and 22 noncoding RNAs. The S. marcescens FY genome reveals not only the cellular and catabolic adaptation mechanisms of this bacterium to Drosophila intestine but also the acquisition of multiple plasmids.

Data availability.

The genome sequence and associated data for S. marcescens FY were deposited under GenBank accession no. CP053378 (chromosome), CP053379 (plasmid 1), and CP053380 (plasmid 2). The raw reads are available at the NCBI SRA (accession no. SRX8587283). The BioProject number is PRJNA631339, and the BioSample accession number is SAMN14859508.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research is supported by the Singapore Ministry of Health’s National Medical Research Council under its Singapore Translational Research (STaR) Investigator Award (NMRC/STaR/0030/2018), the National Parkinson’s Disease Translational Clinical Research (TCR) Programme (NMRC/TCR/013-NNI/2014), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31501175).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Yu VL. 1979. Serratia marcescens: historical perspective and clinical review. N Engl J Med 300:887–893. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197904193001604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bai L, Wang L, Vega-Rodriguez J, Wang G, Wang S. 2019. A gut symbiotic bacterium Serratia marcescens renders mosquito resistance to Plasmodium infection through activation of mosquito immune responses. Front Microbiol 10:1580. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Raymann K, Coon KL, Shaffer Z, Salisbury S, Moran NA. 2018. Pathogenicity of Serratia marcescens strains in honey bees. mBio 9:e01649-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01649-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Nehme NT, Liegeois S, Kele B, Giammarinaro P, Pradel E, Hoffmann JA, Ewbank JJ, Ferrandon D. 2007. A model of bacterial intestinal infections in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Pathog 3:e173. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lee K-Z, Lestradet M, Socha C, Schirmeier S, Schmitz A, Spenle C, Lefebvre O, Keime C, Yamba WM, Bou Aoun R, Liegeois S, Schwab Y, Simon-Assmann P, Dalle F, Ferrandon D. 2016. Enterocyte purge and rapid recovery is a resilience reaction of the gut epithelium to pore-forming toxin attack. Cell Host Microbe 20:716–730. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cronin SJF, Nehme NT, Limmer S, Liegeois S, Pospisilik JA, Schramek D, Leibbrandt A, Simoes RDM, Gruber S, Puc U, Ebersberger I, Zoranovic T, Neely GG, von Haeseler A, Ferrandon D, Penninger JM. 2009. Genome-wide RNAi screen identifies genes involved in intestinal pathogenic bacterial infection. Science 325:340–343. doi: 10.1126/science.1173164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Clark RI, Salazar A, Yamada R, Fitz-Gibbon S, Morselli M, Alcaraz J, Rana A, Rera M, Pellegrini M, Ja WW, Walker DW. 2015. Distinct shifts in microbiota composition during Drosophila aging impair intestinal function and drive mortality. Cell Rep 12:1656–1667. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hunt M, Silva ND, Otto TD, Parkhill J, Keane JA, Harris SR. 2015. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol 16:294. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0849-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ajithkumar B, Ajithkumar VP, Iriye R, Doi Y, Sakai T. 2003. Spore-forming Serratia marcescens subsp. sakuensis subsp. nov., isolated from a domestic wastewater treatment tank. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:253–258. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02158-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence and associated data for S. marcescens FY were deposited under GenBank accession no. CP053378 (chromosome), CP053379 (plasmid 1), and CP053380 (plasmid 2). The raw reads are available at the NCBI SRA (accession no. SRX8587283). The BioProject number is PRJNA631339, and the BioSample accession number is SAMN14859508.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES