Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct;28(5):323–328. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000648

Microtechnologies for inner ear drug delivery

Farzad Forouzandeh 1, David A Borkholder 1
PMCID: PMC7645730  NIHMSID: NIHMS1638614  PMID: 32796268

Structured Abstract

Purpose of review

Treatment of auditory dysfunction is dependent on inner ear drug delivery, with microtechnologies playing an increasingly important role in cochlear access and pharmacokinetic profile control. This review examines recent developments in the field relevant to both clinical and animal research environments.

Recent findings

Micropump technologies are being developed that provide dynamic control of flow rates with refillable reservoirs to enable timed delivery of a series of multiple agents for protection or regeneration therapies. These micropumps can be combined with cochlear implants with integral catheters or used independently with cochleostomy or RWM delivery modalities for therapy development in animal models. Sustained release of steroids with coated cochlear implants remains an active area of research with first-time-in-human demonstration of reduced electrode impedances. Advanced coatings containing neurotrophin producing cells have enhanced spiral ganglion neuron survival in animal models, and have proven safe in a human study. Microneedles have emerged as a novel method for controlled microperforation of the round window membrane with significant enhancement in permeability, which can be combined with emerging matrix formulations that optimize biological interaction and drug release kinetics.

Summary

Microsystem technologies and associated fabrication techniques are providing enhanced and more controlled access to the inner ear for advanced drug delivery approaches, alone and in conjunction with cochlear implants.

Keywords: Inner ear drug delivery, Micropump, Cochlear Implant, Microneedle

Introduction

Effective delivery of protective and curative agents to the inner ear remains challenging due to the anatomical structure of the bony labyrinth. Key barriers include the blood-labyrinth barrier which impacts the efficacy of systemically delivered agents, and the tympanic, oval and round window membranes which are barriers to drugs delivered via the middle ear cavity. Controlling intracochlear drug concentrations, achieving therapeutic dosing, and avoiding systemic side effects have led to significant efforts in improving site-directed delivery approaches. There are numerous review and research articles covering the broad range of approaches to inner ear drug delivery [14] important work in nanoparticles and hydrogels for site-directed delivery [58], mechanisms for propelling nanoparticles through membranes [9], and overviews of advances in molecular and cell-based therapies [10,11,12**]. Important pharmacokinetic principles have been reviewed by Salt and Plontke [13**], with novel methods emerging to quantify intracochlear transport parameters [14*]. This review focuses on state-of-the-art advances in microtechnologies for improving control, and the pharmacokinetic profile, of site-directed drug delivery to the inner ear.

Micropumps for Inner Ear Drug Delivery

Active, acute, local delivery has been done with micropipettes or syringe pumps to investigate various drug delivery features such as concentration gradients of a delivered drug from base to apex in the cochlea [1518], or to deliver gene and stem cell therapies to the inner ear [19]. Commercially available osmotic pumps (Durect Corp, Cupertino, CA) have also been used extensively for more sustained delivery profiles [2022]. The device enables continuous drug delivery from 1 day to 6 weeks at flow rates from 0.1 to 10 μL/hr [23]. While straightforward to implant and power-free, these pumps have a fixed infusion rate and are not refillable once implanted. Hence several groups have pursued research into micropump technologies that can provide dynamic control of flow rates, with refillable reservoirs to enable delivery of a timed series of multiple agents.

Reciprocating Micropumps

Tandon et al. demonstrated a reciprocating micropump which was designed to be used with a head mount for guinea pigs [24*]. This microsystem consists of a drug reservoir, a fluid storage capacitor filled with artificial perilymph, and electromagnetic actuators for valves and pumping. The system operates in a push-pull mode to enable both infusion and withdrawal of fluid from the cochlear compartment, enabling net-zero volume change, with a residence time for diffusion. Each pump stroke generates pulsatile peak flows of ~50 μL/min (infusion) and ~15 μL/min (withdrawal). Acute in vivo experiments with infusion of DNQX into ST of guinea pigs demonstrated safety and efficacy of the micropump with expected auditory shifts as measured by DPOAE and CAP. The long-term impact on hearing with the push-pull delivery modality has not yet been evaluated. The size of the micropump (40 × 30 × ~10 mm3) limits application in smaller rodent models and makes implantation challenging.

Peristaltic Micropumps

Peristaltic micropumps (PMPs) offer unique capabilities for drug delivery, such as continuous flow and high-tolerance to backpressure. iPRECIO(R) SMP-310R pumps are miniature, programmable, commercially available implantable micropumps consisting of a motor-driven rotary finger capable of flow rates down to 0.1 μL/hr [25]. These pumps were used for infusion of fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran as a marker into the guinea pig cochlea [26**]. Contrary to expectations, they observed large longitudinal gradients in dextran concentration along scala tympani after 1 and 7 days of sustained infusion. Although these pumps provide ultra-low flow rates suitable for inner ear delivery, the overall size (25 × 15 × 8 mm3), weight (3.4 g), and catheter size (1.5 mm OD) can create challenges for inner ear drug delivery in small rodents such as mice.

An implantable microsystem optimized for murine inner ear drug delivery has been reported [27]. The microsystem consists of a battery-powered, wirelessly controlled phase-change-driven PMP, a 10 μL refillable microreservoir, and a microcatheter of only 0.25 mm OD. The pump demonstrated flow rates of 10–100 nL/min with 2.4 nL/min resolution [28*]. The 1-mm-thick septum of the microreservoir demonstrated thousands of refill injections without leakage [29*]. The integrated device achieved a thin profile suitable for subcutaneous implantation in mice (size: 19 × 13 × 3 mm3, weight: 0.8 g) and was implanted in mice for delivery of salicylate to the RWM with expected shifts in DPOAE thresholds. Testing including successful long-term biocompatibility assays and chronic implantation.

Co-delivery with Cochlear Implants

Cochlear implants (CI) have provided dramatic results for the profoundly deaf, but with significant inter-user variability. Co-delivery of anti-inflammatories at the time of implantation, sustained, long-term delivery of steroids, neurotrophins, and growth factors, or delivery of gene therapy has the potential to improve cell survival and spiral ganglion neural transmission throughout the cochlea [11,30]. Integration of drug delivery modalities, either via drug elution coatings or via integrated catheters, continues to be an active area of research. Plontke provides an excellent review paper on the co-delivery of drugs with CIs [31**]. Specific recent publications in this area are presented herein.

Steroid Elution Coatings

Coatings on cochlear implants represent a delivery modality that is easily integrated with research and clinical devices. There continues to be significant work characterizing the release kinetics with the objective of achieving stable and sustained concentration profiles within ST. A simulated CI device consisting of DEX loaded silicon rods, with DEX concentrations of 0.1%, 1%, and 10%, was tested via implantation in ST of guinea pigs with perilymph sampling up to 7 weeks post-implantation [32]. Sustained concentrations of about 60 and 100 ng/mL were observed in the perilymph for the 1 and 10% loaded rods respectively, demonstrating the potential for therapeutic dosing by loading of DEX into the silicone of a CI electrode array. Commercial arrays with silicone loaded with 40% (w/w) DEX demonstrated inhibition of osteoneogenesis and reduced SGN loss four weeks post-implant in a guinea pig model of high insertion trauma [33]. Briggs and colleagues demonstrated a first-time-in-human study of a DEX-eluting investigational electrode array [34**]. The commercial array was modified with 40% (w/w) DEX in a silicone back-strap along the length of the electrode array. With experimental implants in 10 human subjects (14 controls), electrode impedances were lower for basal, middle, and apical cochlear regions for the DEX eluting CIs for up to 24 months post-implant. These results support the clinical benefit of steroid eluting CIs.

Neurotrophin Delivery via Encapsulated Cells

While the majority of coating work for CIs has focused on steroid elution to reduce inflammation, there is also interest in coatings consisting of cells that release protective factors. A cell encapsulation device was developed for releasing neurotrophic factors in deafened guinea pigs via immortalized human retinal pigment epithelial cell line transfected to encode either GDNF or BDNF [35*]. The encapsulated cell device (0.4 mm OD, 4 mm length) was positioned within ST of the guinea pig with a tether via a basal turn cochleostomy in combination with a stimulus electrode mimicking a CI. The release of neurotrophic factors (BDNF or GDNF) to the inner ear significantly protected auditory SGNs from neomycin-induced cell death and maintained their electrical responsiveness.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor-producing MSCs encapsulated in alginate have been used to deliver BDNF in combination with CI insertion in a guinea pig model [36,37*]. In deafened animals, the alginate-MSC coating on the CI significantly reduced insertion forces and SGN degeneration, demonstrating the potential for cell-mediated drug delivery in combination with a CI. Interestingly, direct injection of the alginate-MSCs into ST did not provide neuroprotective effects. Roemer and colleagues conducted a human safety study with a biohybrid CI [38**]. Autologous mononuclear cells were isolated from the patient’s bone marrow (BM-MNC) and were coated on a silicone-based CI array using fibrin adhesive. In vitro analysis demonstrates human BM-MNCs release cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors that provide anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects with neonatal rat SGNs. There were no adverse effects in a trial with three human subjects, although the CI performance was highly variable, making it difficult to assess the benefits of the BM-MNC coated array.

MEMS-based Scaffolds

A microelectromechanical system (MEMS)-based microscaffold cochlear electrode array (MiSCEA) was recently developed for steroid elution into the inner ear following CI insertion [39*]. The MiSCEA consists of a flexible electrode array and a 3D microscaffold porous scaffold created with two photon polymerization and subsequently coated with titanium for biocompatibility. The scaffold is 4.28 mm long, 0.27 mm tall, and 0.61 mm wide, and was coated with a DEX-poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) mixture for sustained release of DEX. In vitro results demonstrated six weeks of continuous release of DEX. In vivo experiments with implantation in guinea pigs demonstrated non-statistically significant improvements in hearing thresholds relative to control.

Integral Catheters

An alternate approach to drug elution matrices (polymer or cellular) is direct delivery of therapeutics via a catheter integrated with the CI, where the catheter is connected via a coupler to a pump. This approach has the potential to provide dynamic control of intracochlear drug concentrations, and can enable time sequenced delivery of multiple agents if connected to a pump with a refillable reservoir. There are two basic approaches to catheter integration, either direct molding within the CI array during production, or by external coupling to a prefabricated CI. Shepherd and Xu developed a custom CI with a 0.163 mm polyimide catheter embedded within the core of a silicone molded array, with fluid efflux at the tip driven by an osmotic pump [40]. More recently, Salt and colleagues affixed a 0.102 mm ID polyimide catheter to the exterior surface of a commercially available CI array, with the tip positioned after the second electrode [26**]. A commercial PMP was used for delivery of FITC-labeled dextran markers as described above.

Microneedles

Transtympanic delivery of therapeutic agents to the middle ear represents a clinically accessible route which has been recently reviewed [4]. One key challenge is variable absorption through the RW and OW resulting in inconsistency in intracochlear concentrations. Several recent investigations attempt to improve the RWM permeability via chemical (reviewed at [41]) and physical methods. Ultrasound-aided microbubble cavitation has been used to enhance RWM permeability, with 11.2× enhancement of DEX delivery to the guinea pig RWM [42,43,44*]. However, there has been increasing interest in physical disruption of the RWM using microneedles which have demonstrated a 35× increase in the permeability coefficient of the guinea pig RWM membrane [45*], with permeability enhancement dependent on perforation size and the drug delivered [46]. Yu et al. showed that for a guinea pig model, a 100 μm microneedle can leave a 93 × 35 μm2 hole that heals within a week after perforation [47]. Microneedles were also tested on frozen human temporal bones with 154 × 16 μm2 and 103 × 8 μm2 perforations using 150 μm and 100 μm microneedles respectively [48*].

One of the challenges of using microneedles is controlling insertion depth to ensure perforation while not damaging the sensitive tissues within ST. Silver-plated microneedles as silver/silver chloride electrodes were tested in vitro and demonstrated the ability to detect the moment of penetration across the RWM [49]. This will be an important capability in clinical translation of this technology to ensure consistency and efficacy of the procedure. Effective microneedle design requires an understanding of the microanatomical and mechanical properties of the RWM along with the mechanical properties of the microneedle to minimize tissue damage and needle failure [48*,50]. Different shapes for the microneedles have been fabricated, including tapered [48*,50], serrated [51], and dual-wedge [52]. Polymers, silicon, and metals have all been used as substrates or coating materials to fabricate microneedles using various fabrication processes including micromachining, micro-milling, electrical discharge machining, and two-photon polymerization lithography which are reviewed in [50].

Miscellaneous Microtechnologies

Recently new methods are being developed to create drug delivery matrices of controlled composition and shape. Porous scaffolds have been created using electrospinning fabrication, utilizing current to print charged fibers from a metformin and polylactic acid (PLA) solution onto a surface [53]. The reservoirs were 2 mm in diameter, 0.15–0.25 mm thick, with fiber diameters ranging from ~0.35 to 1.1 μm. In vitro experiments showed at least 6 weeks of continuous elution of metformin through a model of RWM, however, the protective efficacy of metformin was not observed using Sh-Sy5y cells. Nonetheless, this novel and tunable drug delivery mechanism has potential for inner ear drug delivery.

Hot-melt extrusion was recently used to fabricate PLGA-based thin rod-shaped biodegradable implants (0.3 mm OD, 3 mm long) for controlled intracochlear release [54*]. The extrudates had 10% of DEX, while PEG was used in different compositions to improve flexibility and release rate. Ex-vivo experiments demonstrated the right balance of stiffness and flexibility for implant in the guinea pig ST. In vitro experiments showed weeks of DEX release with the rate depending on the composition of PEG/PLGA. Simulations show controlled release over a period of 35 days suggesting this type of implant could provide sustained DEX concentrations within ST. However, morphological analysis of the implant demonstrates significant swelling (43% length, 77% diameter) over a 21-day period. The impact of this swelling on the confined ST space is unknown. At four weeks the implants disintegrated into several fragments, suggesting the potential for full disintegration over time.

Diamond-shaped DEX microcrystals were synthesized and coated with poly L-lysine (PLL) and silk fibroin (SF) to improve mucous adhesive properties [55*]. The DEX-PLL/SF microcrystals enhanced adherence to the RWM, with guinea pig in vivo results demonstrating sustained release kinetics based on perilymph sampling and HPLC analysis. The research highlights the importance of engineering drug delivery vehicles at the micro-scale to achieve the right balance of biological interaction and drug release kinetics.

Conclusions

Microsystem technologies have enabled new classes of micropumps with precise dosing control and multi-agent delivery that create opportunities to advance emerging protective and restorative therapies for the inner ear. These pumps can be combined with CIs in the future for co-delivery of steroids, neurotrophins, and other agents to reduce insertion-related inflammatory response, and to preserve SGNs. Advances in coating technologies with demonstrated DEX sustained release, and neurotrophin delivery via encapsulated, engineered cells offer a near-term opportunity to improve CI success and reduce inter-user variability. For drug delivery through the RWM, mechanical microperforation with microneedles has yielded promising results for transient enhancements in RMW permeability. These techniques can be combined with emerging microfabricated matrix formulations and engineered microcrystals to improve the consistency and dosing of RWM drug delivery approaches. Future research will leverage the potential of these microsystem technologies in emerging otoprotective and regeneration therapies.

Key Points.

  • Effective inner ear therapies require accurate control of intracochlear drug concentrations over time.

  • Microtechnologies are improving cochlear access and pharmacokinetic profile control.

  • Micropump technologies with refillable reservoirs are sufficiently miniaturized for chronic implantation in mice for programmed delivery of multiple curative agents, with or without cochlear implants.

  • Drug-eluting cochlear implants with steroids or live-cell-produced neurotrophic factors have seen first-time-in-human use.

  • Microneedles can transiently increase round window membrane permeability to enhance the efficacy of middle ear drug delivery approaches.

Acknowledgments

Financial support and sponsorship.

This work was supported by the NIH NIDCD 1R01DC014568.

Abbreviations

BDNF

Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

BM-MNC

Bone Marrow derived Mononuclear Cells

CAP

Compound Action Potential

CI

Cochlear Implants

DNQX

6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione

DPOAE

Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions

DEX

Dexamethasone

FITC

Fluorescein IsoThioCyanate

GDNF

Glial Cell-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

ID

Inner Diameter

MEMS

MicroElectroMechanical Systems

MiSCEA

MicroScaffold Cochlear Electrode Array

MSC

Mesenchymal Stem Cells

PEG

Polyethylene Glycol

PLGA

Poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid)

PMP

Peristaltic MicroPump

OD

Outer Diameter

RWM

Round Window Membrane

SGN

Spiral Ganglion Neurons

ST

Scala Tympani

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest.

None.

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, (18 months / 2019 - present) have been highlighted as:

• of special interest

•• of outstanding interest

  • 1.Piu F, Bishop KM. Local Drug Delivery for the Treatment of Neurotology Disorders. Front Cell Neurosci 2019; 13: 238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chin OY, Diaz RC. State-of-the-art methods in clinical intracochlear drug delivery. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 2019; 27: 381–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Anderson CR, Xie C, Su MP, et al. Local Delivery of Therapeutics to the Inner Ear: The State of the Science. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 2019; 13: 418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Patel J, Szczupak M, Rajguru S, et al. Inner Ear Therapeutics: An Overview of Middle Ear Delivery. Front Cell Neurosci 2019; 13: 261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mittal R, Pena SA, Zhu A, et al. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery in the inner ear: current challenges, limitations and opportunities. Artif Cells, Nanomedicine Biotechnol 2019; 47: 1312–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hao J, Li SK. Inner ear drug delivery: Recent advances, challenges, and perspective. Eur J Pharm Sci 2019; 126: 82–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Leterme G, Guigou C, Oudot A, et al. Superparamagnetic Nanoparticle Delivery to the Cochlea Through Round Window by External Magnetic Field: Feasibility and Toxicity. Surg Innov 2019; 26: 646–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ramaswamy B, Roy S, Apolo AB, et al. Magnetic nanoparticle mediated steroid delivery mitigates cisplatin induced hearing loss. Front Cell Neurosci 2017; 11: 268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Liang Z, Yu H, Lai J, et al. An easy-to-prepare microshotgun for efficient transmembrane delivery by powering nanoparticles. J Control Release 2020; 321: 119–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ma Y, Wise AK, Shepherd RK, et al. New molecular therapies for the treatment of hearing loss. Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2019; 200: 190–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Devare J, Gubbels S, Raphael Y. Outlook and future of inner ear therapy. Hearing Research 2018; 368: 127–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ren Y, Landegger LD, Stankovic KM. Gene therapy for human sensorineural hearing loss. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 2019; 13: 323.** Comprehensive review of gene therapy for sensorineural hearing loss covering viral, non-viral, and surgical delivery approaches.
  • 13.Salt AN, Plontke SK. Pharmacokinetic principles in the inner ear: Influence of drug properties on intratympanic applications. Hearing Research 2018; 368: 28–40.** Pharmacokinetics of the inner ear with consideration of drug molecular properties on transport into, and clearance from the cochlea. Drugs commonly used in clinical practice are analyzed to elucidate characteristics that impact clinical efficacy.
  • 14.Moudgalya SS, Wilson K, Zhu X, et al. Cochlear pharmacokinetics - Micro-computed tomography and learning-prediction modeling for transport parameter determination. Hear Res 2019; 380: 46–59.* Non-invasive technique for quantifying agents within the cochlea in 3D. Learning of transport parameters between the major cochlear scalae and to clearance based on direct imaging of the cochlea during in vivo delivery of a contrast agent.
  • 15.Borkholder DA, Zhu X, Hyatt BT, et al. Murine intracochlear drug delivery: Reducing concentration gradients within the cochlea. Hear Res 2010; 268: 2–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Borkholder DA, Zhu X, Frisina RD. Round window membrane intracochlear drug delivery enhanced by induced advection. J Control Release 2014; 174: 171–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Talaei S, Schnee ME, Aaron KA, et al. Dye Tracking Following Posterior Semicircular Canal or Round Window Membrane Injections Suggests a Role for the Cochlea Aqueduct in Modulating Distribution. Front Cell Neurosci 2019; 13: 471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Raghu V, Ramakrishna Y, Burkard RF, et al. A novel intracochlear injection method for rapid drug delivery to vestibular end organs. J Neurosci Methods 2020; 341: 108689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yoshimura H, Shibata SB, Ranum PT, et al. Enhanced viral-mediated cochlear gene delivery in adult mice by combining canal fenestration with round window membrane inoculation. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Draf C, Chavez E, Pak K, et al. An In Vivo Model As An Approach To Deliver Potential Therapies For Noise-Induced Hair Cell Loss. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 2020; 99(S 02): S291. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee MY, Lee JH, Lee HS, et al. Continuous topical drug delivery using osmotic pump in animal cochlear implant model: Continuous steroid delivery is effective for hearing preservation. Acta Otolaryngol 2015; 135: 791–798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee MY, Kim YC, Jang J, et al. Dexamethasone delivery for hearing preservation in animal cochlear implant model: continuity, long-term release, and fast release rate. Acta Otolaryngol 2020; 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Specifications – ALZET® Osmotic Pumps, https://www.alzet.com/products/alzet_pumps/specifications/ (accessed 29 June 2020).
  • 24.Tandon V, Kang WS, Robbins TA, et al. Microfabricated reciprocating micropump for intracochlear drug delivery with integrated drug/fluid storage and electronically controlled dosing. Lab Chip 2016; 16: 829–846.* Backpack micropump with a novel push-pull delivery mode to enable zero net volume fluid delivery to the cochlea, demonstrated with acute delivery of DNQX to the guinea pig cochlea.
  • 25.IPRECIO SMP-310R, https://www.iprecio.com/products/tabid/245/Default.aspx (accessed 3 July 2020).
  • 26.Salt A, Hartsock J, Gill R, et al. Perilymph pharmacokinetics of marker applied through a cochlear implant in guinea pigs. PLoS One 2017; 12(8): e0183374.** Integration of a catheter with a guinea pig cochlear implant with delivery of a marker for up to 7 days. Persistent longitudinal concentration gradients from base to apex were inconsistent with pharmacokinetic models, suggesting inner ear pharmacokinetics may be altered in the period after cochlear implantation.
  • 27.Forouzandeh F, Zhu X, Ahamed NN, et al. A modular microreservoir for active implantable drug delivery. bioRxiv 2019; 762716. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Forouzandeh F, Zhu X, Alfadhel A, et al. A nanoliter resolution implantable micropump for murine inner ear drug delivery. J Control Release 2019; 298: 27–37.* Fully programmable, implantable micropump designed specifically for murine inner ear drug delivery with nL/min resolution and a microtubing catheter of 250 μm OD, eliminating the need to connect a smaller catheter for interfacing with the biological system as with other pumps.
  • 29.Forouzandeh F, Ahamed NN, Hsu M-C, et al. A 3D-Printed Modular Microreservoir for Drug Delivery. Micromachines 2020; 11: 1–17.* Microreservoir design for micropumps that incorporates a 1 mm thick septum to enable refilling while maintaining an ultra-thin profile (3mm) for subcutaneous implantation. This represents a key microtechnology advancement for miniaturization critical for advanced therapy development in the mouse.
  • 30.Pinyon JL, von Jonquieres G, Crawford EN, et al. Neurotrophin gene augmentation by electrotransfer to improve cochlear implant hearing outcomes. Hearing Research 2019; 380: 137–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Plontke SK, Götze G, Rahne T, et al. Intracochlear drug delivery in combination with cochlear implants: Current aspects. HNO 2017; 65: 19–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liebau A, Schilp S, Mugridge K, et al. Long-Term in vivo Release Profile of Dexamethasone-Loaded Silicone Rods Implanted Into the Cochlea of Guinea Pigs. Front Neurol 2020; 10: 1377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chambers S, Newbold C, Stathopoulos D, et al. Protecting against electrode insertion trauma using dexamethasone. Cochlear Implants Int 2019; 20: 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Briggs R, O ‘Leary S, Birman C, et al. Comparison of electrode impedance measures between a dexamethasone-eluting and standard CochlearTM Contour Advance® electrode in adult cochlear implant recipients. Hear Res 2020; 390: 107924.** First-time-in-human study of a dexamethasone-eluting investigational cochlear implant electrode array. Electrode impedance was tracked for a period of 24 months post-implant, with statistically significant enhancement in impedance for basal and middle regions with the eluting implant.
  • 35.Fransson A, Tornøe J, Wahlberg LU, et al. The feasibility of an encapsulated cell approach in an animal deafness model. J Control Release 2018; 270: 275–281.* Genetically modified cells are encapsulated in a semi-permeable membrane for implantation in ST. GDNF production enhanced SGN survival over BDNF four weeks post-implant.
  • 36.Hügl S, Scheper V, Gepp MM, et al. Coating stability and insertion forces of an alginate-cell-based drug delivery implant system for the inner ear. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019; 97: 90–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Scheper V, Hoffmann A, Gepp MM, et al. Stem Cell Based Drug Delivery for Protection of Auditory Neurons in a Guinea Pig Model of Cochlear Implantation. Front Cell Neurosci 2019; 13: 177.* BDNF producing MSCs encapsulated in an alginate coating on a cochlear implant enhanced SGN survival with no impact to fibrosis or impedance after 4 weeks post-implant in the guinea pig. Demonstrated coating the CI is more beneficial than directly injecting the encapsulated cells into ST.
  • 38.Roemer A, Köhl U, Majdani O, et al. Biohybrid cochlear implants in human neurosensory restoration. Stem Cell Res Ther 2016; 7: 1–14.** BM-MNC cells were isolated from the patient’s bone marrow and affixed to a human CI with no adverse effects noted in three human subjects. This is the first use of autologous cell transplantation to the human inner ear.
  • 39.Jang J, Kim J young, Kim YC, et al. A 3D Microscaffold Cochlear Electrode Array for Steroid Elution. Adv Healthcare Materials 2019; 8: 1900379.* 3D micro-scaffolds were coated with DEX/PLGA for integration around a CI array for drug elution. The thinness of the technology and flexibility in design can enable integration over commercial CI arrays to enhance surface area for drug elution.
  • 40.Shepherd RK, Xu J. A multichannel scala tympani electrode array incorporating a drug delivery system for chronic intracochlear infusion. Hear Res 2002; 172: 92–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Szeto B, Chiang H, Valentini C, et al. Inner ear delivery : Challenges and opportunities. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2020; 5: 122–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shih CP, Chen HC, Chen HK, et al. Ultrasound-aided microbubbles facilitate the delivery of drugs to the inner ear via the round window membrane. J Control Release 2013; 167: 167–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Liao AH, Wang CH, Weng PY, et al. Ultrasound-induced microbubble cavitation via a transcanal or transcranial approach facilitates inner ear drug delivery. JCI Insight 2020; 5(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shih C-P, Chen H-CH-K, Lin Y-YY-C, et al. Middle-ear dexamethasone delivery via ultrasound microbubbles attenuates noise-induced hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2019; 129: 1907–1914.* This study demonstrates efficacy of ultrasound aided delivery of DEX via the RWM in a noise induced hearing loss paradigm. Cavitation of phospholipid microbubbles reduces required ultrasound energy to levels that do not impact normal hearing. This approach could be applied clinically to enhance middle ear therapy delivery.
  • 45.Kelso CM, Watanabe H, Wazen JM, et al. Microperforations significantly enhance diffusion across round window membrane. Otol Neurotol 2015; 36: 694–700.* Diffusion cell model to quantify RWM permeability, with a demonstrated 35x enhancement by microperforations that occupy only 0.22% of the RWM area. This paper provides the quantitative basis for subsequent microneedle development.
  • 46.Santimetaneedol A, Wang Z, Arteaga DN, et al. Small molecule delivery across a perforated artificial membrane by thermoreversible hydrogel poloxamer 407. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2019; 182: 110300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yu M, Arteaga DN, Aksit A, et al. Anatomical and Functional Consequences of Microneedle Perforation of Round Window Membrane. Otol Neurotol 2019; 41: 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chiang H, Yu M, Aksit A, et al. 3D-Printed Microneedles Create Precise Perforations in Human Round Window Membrane in Situ. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41: 277–284.** Microneedle design for the human RWM, considering important aspects including needle strength and membrane deformation. Results and analysis will be important for translation of successful animal experiments to human clinical trials.
  • 49.Wazen JM, Stevens JP, Watanabe H, et al. Silver/silver chloride microneedles can detect penetration through the round window membrane. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater 2017; 105: 307–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Aksit A, Rastogi S, Nadal ML, et al. Drug delivery device for the inner ear: ultrasharp fully metallic microneedles. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2020; 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Stevens JP, Watanabe H, Kysar JW, et al. Serrated needle design facilitates precise round window membrane perforation. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A 2016; 104: 1633–1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Watanabe H, Cardoso L, Lalwani AK, et al. A dual wedge microneedle for sampling of perilymph solution via round window membrane. Biomed Microdevices 2016; 18: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kita A, Saldate J, Chang C, et al. Implantable Drug Reservoir Devices for Inner Ear Delivery of Pharmacotherapeutics. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg (United States) 2020; 019459982093022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lehner E, Gündel D, Liebau A, et al. Intracochlear PLGA based implants for dexamethasone release: Challenges and solutions. Int J Pharm X 2019; 1:100015.* Biodegradable PLGA/PEG/DEX micro-rods were tested with ex vivo ST insertion, and in vitro analysis of drug release kinetics and biodegradation. Mechanical analysis of the rods for different formulations are beneficial for others creating drug elution implants for the inner ear.
  • 55.Li M, Ai M, Yang Y, et al. Silk-coated dexamethasone non-spherical microcrystals for local drug delivery to inner ear. Eur J Pharm Sci 2020; 150: 105336.* Synthesized DEX microcrystals were coated with a combination of poly L-lysine and silk fibrin to enhance adhesion to the RWM. The study effectively balanced biological interaction and drug release kinetics, with implications to a broad range of inner ear drug delivery approaches.

RESOURCES