Skip to main content
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics logoLink to Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
. 2020 Jun 12;18(2):186–193. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2019.03.007

BGVD: An Integrated Database for Bovine Sequencing Variations and Selective Signatures

Ningbo Chen 1,#, Weiwei Fu 1,#, Jianbang Zhao 2, Jiafei Shen 1, Qiuming Chen 1, Zhuqing Zheng 1, Hong Chen 1, Tad S Sonstegard 3, Chuzhao Lei 1, Yu Jiang 1,
PMCID: PMC7646086  PMID: 32540200

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing has yielded a vast amount of cattle genomic data for global characterization of population genetic diversity and identification of genomic regions under natural and artificial selection. However, efficient storage, querying, and visualization of such large datasets remain challenging. Here, we developed a comprehensive database, the Bovine Genome Variation Database (BGVD). It provides six main functionalities: gene search, variation search, genomic signature search, Genome Browser, alignment search tools, and the genome coordinate conversion tool. BGVD contains information on genomic variations comprising ~60.44 M SNPs, ~6.86 M indels, 76,634 CNV regions, and signatures of selective sweeps in 432 samples from modern cattle worldwide. Users can quickly retrieve distribution patterns of these variations for 54 cattle breeds through an interactive source of breed origin map, using a given gene symbol or genomic region for any of the three versions of the bovine reference genomes (ARS-UCD1.2, UMD3.1.1, and Btau 5.0.1). Signals of selection sweep are displayed as Manhattan plots and Genome Browser tracks. To further investigate and visualize the relationships between variants and signatures of selection, the Genome Browser integrates all variations, selection data, and resources, from NCBI, the UCSC Genome Browser, and Animal QTLdb. Collectively, all these features make the BGVD a useful archive for in-depth data mining and analyses of cattle biology and cattle breeding on a global scale. BGVD is publicly available at http://animal.nwsuaf.edu.cn/BosVar.

Keywords: Bovine, Sequence variation, Selective signatures, QTL, Database

Introduction

Cattle are usually considered the most economically important livestock. The species numbers more than 1.4 billion on a global scale, constituting some 800 extant cattle breeds in 2016 according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO; http://www.fao.org/home/en/). Cattle are now kept on all inhabited continents, in contrasting climatic zones and under very different conditions [1]. The different uses of cattle and the selection for desired traits have resulted in diverse populations distributed across the world. To meet projected global demands for food, initiatives [2], [3], [4], [5] such as the 1000 Bull Genomes Project are generating resequencing data from breeds worldwide. The DNA-based selection tools built from these data are further accelerating rates of genetic gain and improving animal health and welfare [2]. However, the limited amount of variation data provided by dbSNP [6], restricted access to the 1000 Bull Genomes Project [7], and the existence of only sporadic cattle databases that are specialized in gene and quantitative trait locus (QTL) annotation [8], [9], [10] considerably hinder the utility of these data. Furthermore, accessing and integrating resequencing data in a highly interactive, user-friendly web interface, especially data for allele frequency resource and selection in natural populations, is a pre-requisite for identifying functional genes. Therefore, building a public data repository is vital for collecting a wide variety of cattle resequencing data and performing integrative, in-depth analyses within the research community.

Here, we develop the Bovine Genome Variation Database (BGVD), the first web-based public database for accessing dense and broadly representative bovine whole-genome variation data. BGVD is a data repository that focuses on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), indels, copy number variations (CNVs), as well as selective signatures underlying domestication and population bottleneck events. We have implemented a large number of summary statistics informative for the action of selection, such as nucleotide diversity (Pi) [11], heterozygosity (Hp) [12], integrated haplotype score (iHS) [13], Fixation index (FST) [14], cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity (XP-EHH) [15], and the cross-population composite likelihood ratio (XP-CLR) [16] (Table 1). Six early differentiated ancestral populations were used for selection analysis, including African taurine, European taurine, Eurasian taurine, East Asian taurine, Chinese indicine, and Indian indicine. The current version of BGVD contains 60,439,391 SNPs, 6,859,056 indels, and 76,634 CNV regions derived from 432 cattle samples representing 54 breeds. With its functionalities for browsing variations and their selection scores, BGVD provides an important publicly accessible resource to the research community to facilitate breeding research and applications, and offers information on dominant functional loci and targets for genetic improvement through selection.

Table 1.

Statistical terms for selection sweep in BGVD

Statistical term Abbreviation Population 1 Population 2 Window size (kb)
Nucleotide diversity Pi Indian indicine (IN) 30
Heterozygosity Hp Chinese indicine (CN) 60
Integrated haplotype score iHS East Asian taurine (EA) 30
Eurasian taurine (EUA)
European taurine (EUR)
African taurine (AFR)
Bos indicus (BIN)
Bos taurus (BTA)
Fixation index FST Indian indicine (IN) Other five groups 30
Cross-population composite likelihood ratio XP-CLR Chinese indicine(CN) Other five groups 30
Cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity XP-EHH East Asian taurine (EA) Other five groups 30
Eurasian taurine (EUA) Other five groups
European taurine (EUR) Other five groups
African taurine (AFR) Other five groups
Bos indicus (BIN) Bos taurus (BTA)

Note: BGVD, Bovine Genome Variation Database.

Database structure and content

The BGVD includes SNPs, indels, CNVs, genomic selection, and other database resources for cattle, such as NCBI, the UCSC Genome Browser, Animal QTLdb, KEGG, and AmiGO2. A detailed description is provided in the following sections and documents on the homepage.

Sample information

Our data set integrates genomes from previously published cattle genetic studies [3], [4], [5], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], providing a total of 432 samples representing 54 breeds. All raw sequence data were obtained from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of NCBI. The set of samples is grouped by location of breed origin and contains the following number of individuals: 108 West European, 83 Central-South European, 9 Middle East, 9 Tibetan, 28 Northeast Asian, 47 North-Central Chinese, 21 Northwest Chinese, 33 South Chinese, 24 Indo-Pakistan, and 70 African cattle. Geographic information and other detailed information for each sample is provided on the homepage and the corresponding “Sample Table” page.

Variant information

Data were processed and loaded into the BGVD using the following pipeline according to previously published protocols [5] (Figure 1A, see detailed description on the Documentation page at of the website). First, short, 250-bp paired-end Illumina reads were aligned to the Btau 5.0.1 genome assembly (GCF_000003205.7) using BWA [22], resulting in an average of ~13× coverage of the bovine genome among the cattle varieties. Duplicate reads were removed using Picard tools (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). The Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) was used to detect SNPs and indels [23]. A total of ~60.4 million autosomal SNPs and ~6.8 million autosomal indels were identified. Beagle was used to phase the identified SNPs [24]. Annotation of SNPs and indels was carried out using snpEff [25]. Minor allele frequency (MAF) for all cattle as well as allele frequencies for each breed and the “core” cattle group (see Population structure section) were calculated with PLINK [26]. CNVcaller [27] was used to discover CNVs, and 76,634 CNV regions (CNVR) were detected in 432 cattle genomes. Then, the CNVs were annotated using Annovar [28]. Given that three versions of the bovine genome, Btau 5.0.1, UMD3.1.1, and the newly-released ARS-UCD1.2 (project accession: NKLS00000000), are commonly used, we produced liftOver chain files (Btau5.0.1ToUMD3.1.1.chain.gz and Btau5.0.1ToARS-UCD1.2.chain.gz) and converted variation coordinates to those of the other two genomes using liftOver [29].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Pipeline used to construct BGVD and population analysis of 432 cattle

A. Analysis pipeline used to construct BGVD. B. Principal component analysis of 432 cattle. Six “core” cattle groups are numbered in the plot. C. Model-based clustering of cattle breeds using the program ADMIXTURE with K = 2–8 (plotted in R). BGVD, Bovine Genome Variation Database.

Population structure

The population structure of all cattle was inferred using Eigensoft and ADMIXTURE [30], [31], based on the genome-wide unlinked SNP dataset, according to previously published protocols [5]. All 432 individuals were used for principal component analysis, and the results were consistent with our previous results [6], except that the African taurine cattle were split from other taurine cattle (Figure 1B). To reduce the bias due to sample size, 10 individuals were randomly selected for breeds that had more than 10 samples. A total of 317 cattle samples were selected for estimating ancestral populations by setting K = 2 through K = 8 in ADMIXTURE (Figure 1C). Combining with our previous results [5], in addition to five geographically distributed ancestral groups (European taurine, Eurasian taurine, East Asian taurine, Chinese indicine, and Indian indicine), African taurine was added in this study (Figure 1B).

Selection evaluation

BGVD provides signatures of selection for eight groups, six of which were the “core” cattle groups that we identified as ancestral groups and the other two of which were directly divided into two categories based on sub-species: Bos indicus and Bos taurus. Here, selective signals were evaluated using six methods, namely, Pi, Hp, iHS, FST, XP-EHH, and XP-CLR (Table 1).

Database implementation

The web interface of BGVD was built by combining an Apache web server, PHP language, HTML, JavaScript, and the relational database managements system MySQL. High-quality SNPs, indels, CNVs, selection scores and their corresponding annotations, classification, and threshold values, were processed with Perl scripts and stored in the MySQL database. The server application was written in PHP, and CodeIgniter was chosen as the model-view-controller (MVC) framework for the system. A client interface developed with HTML5 and JavaScript was used to implement search, data visualization, and download. Moreover, we introduced web-based software, such as BLAST, BLAT, liftOver, and the UCSC Genome Browser (hereafter referred to as ‘Gbrowse’) [29], [32], into BGVD. Information including variations, selection scores, gene annotation, QTLs, and phastCons conserved elements of 20-way mammals and 100-way vertebrates was integrated into Gbrowse to facilitate global presentation.

Web interface and usage

BGVD uses a series of user-friendly interfaces to display results. All the parts in our browser are dynamic and interactive. We provided six main functionalities: (i) Gene Quick Search, (ii) Variation Search, (iii) Genomic Selection Search, (iv) Genome Browser, (v) Alignment Search Tools (BLAT/BLAST), and (vi) Genome Coordinate Conversion Tool (liftOver).

For “Gene Quick Search”, we integrated information from NCBI, AmiGO 2, and KEGG. Users can input a gene symbol to view all available information, including basic gene information (e.g., genomic location, transcript and protein profile, relevant Gene Ontology (GO) ID, GO terms, and KEGG pathways), gene variations (e.g., SNPs, indels, and CNVs), as well as selective signatures. We also provide links to Gbrowse and external databases (NCBI, AmiGO 2, and KEGG) to help users obtain more information, such as gene/mRNA/protein sequence, KEGG Orthology (KO), and motif.

For “Variation Search”, BGVD allows users to obtain information on SNPs, indels, and CNVs by searching for a specific gene or a genomic region in three versions of the bovine genome (ARS-UCD1.2, UMD3.1.1, and Btau 5.0.1) (Figure 2A). Users can filter SNPs and indels further by “Advanced Search”, in which certain parameters (Figure 2B), such as MAF and consequence type, can be set; this option enables users to narrow down the items of interest in an efficient and intuitive manner.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Screenshots of SNP data search and the results retrieved for two SNP examples

A. Search items involving rsID, gene name, and position of three bovine reference genomes. B. Advanced Search menu enabling filtering for MAF and consequence type. C. Detailed annotation of the rs384881761 locus of the KRT27 gene and the allele frequency distribution pie chart of 54 cattle breeds worldwide. D. Display format of the allele frequency for the rs109815800 locus of the PLAG1 among defined ancestral groups. MAF, minor allele frequency.

The results are presented in an interactive table and graph. For SNPs and indels, users can obtain related details including variant position, alleles, MAF, variant effect, rsID, and the allele frequency distribution pattern in 54 cattle breeds worldwide (Figure 2C) or in six “core” cattle groups (Figure 2D), which could help users dynamically visualize breed-specific (exemplified with rs384881761, KRT27) [2] or ancestral group-specific (exemplified with rs109815800, PLAG1) [33] variants and their global geographical distributions.

For CNVs, users can obtain information about CNVR, such as intersected genomic regions, CNV length, the closest gene, consequence type (Figure 3A), and copy number distribution in 432 individuals representing 49 cattle populations. We provide three types of display formats of copy number distributions, in which the categories and haploid copy number of each individual can be viewed (Figure 3B–D), such as the “view” button, which produces a scatter plot (exemplified with MATN3); “Gbrowse”, which is linked to the “CNVR Bar” track (exemplified with KIT); and the more detailed visualization “cnvBar” track, which generates a box-whisker plot (exemplified with CIITA) [34].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Screenshots of CNVR data search and three types of formats for result display

A. Search items involving the gene name and position of three bovine reference genomes. B. Results involving detailed annotation for the CNVR and copy number distribution patterns of 432 individuals representing 49 populations. Displayed is an example for MATN3, which shows different copy numbers in the West Europe Holstein population. C. “CNVR Bar” track in the bar chart format in Gbrowse. Displayed is an example for the KIT gene, which is related to coat color in Herefords. D. The more detailed visualization “CNVR Bar” track in the format of a box-whisker plot, displaying copy number distribution in 49 cattle populations. Displayed is an example for CIITA, which lies within a high-frequency gain CNVR identified in multiple breeds that show nematode resistance. CNVR, copy number variation region; Gbrowse, UCSC Genome Browser.

In the genomic signature interface, users can select a specific gene symbol or genomic region, one of the statistical methods (Pi, Hp, iHS, FST, XP-CLR, and XP-EHH), and a specific “core” cattle group to view the selection scores (Table 1 and Figure 4A). In our database, the selection scores are pre-processed by several algorithms (Z-transform and logarithm). The results are retrieved in a tabular format (Figure 4B). When users click the “show” button on the table, selective signals are displayed in Manhattan plots or common graphics, where the target region or gene is highlighted in red/blue color. In addition, the “Gbrowse” button can locate the position of the selection and differentiation profiles of specific groups (Figure 4C). To demonstrate the function of our database, we extracted results for a number of putatively selected genes detected using different methods: OR2T33 [35], POFUT1 (Figure 4B and C), STOM, EPB42 [3], PLAG1 [33], MSRB3 [35], CDC42SE1 [36], R3HDM1 [37], and ASIP [5].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Screenshots of search for genomic selection data and representation of the selection data

A. Search items involving gene name, position, statistical method (Pi, Hp, iHS, FST, XP-EHH, and XP-CLR), and specific “core” cattle groups. B. Detailed annotation for the target gene or region in the variant grid and the corresponding selective signal at the chromosome and whole-genome levels. Displayed is an example for selective signal of the OR2T33 gene in Eurasian taurine population. C. Example of the OR2T33 gene in “SNPs&Hap” track. Different haplotypes of the Bos taurus and Bos indicus groups are shown in blue and red, respectively. Numbers 1–16 indicate 16 representative tracks. D. Examples showing selection scores of the POFUT1 gene, calculated using 6 different statistical methods, in the CN group in red, with each group represented by a different color. Here, we show Fst scores of IN and EA groups in orange and green, respectively. Regions with strong selection in the CN group are highlighted in cyan. E. The 57 tracks in Gbrowse. Each button represents a track. Pi, nucleotide diversity; Hp, heterozygosity; iHS, integrated haplotype score; Fst, fixation index; XP-EHH, cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity; XP-CLR, cross-population composite likelihood ratio; CN, Chinese indicine; IN, Indian indicine; EA, East Asian.

To further investigate the relationship between variations and signatures of selection, Gbrowse has been introduced to support our database. Currently, 57 tracks have been released for the Btau 5.0.1 assembly (Figure 4E). Users can search with a gene symbol or genomic region to see SNPs, indels, CNVs, genomic signatures, QTLs, and conserved elements in the global view. All search pages in the BGVD allow quick access to Gbrowse to deepen the functional inference of the candidate gene or region by combining other tracks. Most noteworthy, the phased haplotypes from six “core” cattle groups are displayed in “SNPs&Hap” track. The ‘squish’ or ‘pack’ view highlights local patterns of genetic linkage between variants. In the haplotype sorting display, variants are presented as vertical bars with reference alleles in blue and alternate alleles in red so that local patterns of linkage can be easily discerned when clustering is used to visually group co-occurring allele sequences in haplotypes. We display different haplotypes of the Bos taurus and Bos indicus groups in Figure 4C. We highlight that the tracks of selection statistics from different populations are visualized in different colors (Figure 4D).

We also introduced two sequence alignment tools, webBlat and NCBI BLAST, as well as a genome coordinate conversion tool (liftOver) [29] into the BGVD. The webBlat tool can be used to quickly search for homologous regions of a DNA or mRNA sequence, which can then be displayed in Gbrowse. BLAST can find regions of local similarity between sequences, which can be used to infer functional and evolutionary relationships between sequences. The liftOver tool is used to translate genomic coordinates from one assembly version into another. BGVD provides an online lift from Btau_5.0.1 to UMD_3.1.1 and from Btau_5.0.1 to ARS-UCD1.2.

Discussion

By applying summary statistics to a relatively extensive data set from cattle genomes, we provide a timely and expandable resource for the population genomics research community. An associated user-friendly genome browser gives a representation of the genetic variation in a genomic region of interest and offers functionality for an array of downstream analyses. We expect that BGVD will prove useful for genome mining through the large number of test statistics and the fine-grained character of resequencing data. We believe that this expandable resource will facilitate the interpretation of signals of selection at different temporal, geographical, and genomic scales.

Data availability

BGVD is publicly available at http://animal.nwsuaf.edu.cn/BosVar.

Authors' contributions

NC, WF, and YJ conceived the project and designed the study. NC and WF drafted the manuscript. TSS, CL, YJ, HC, and ZZ revised the manuscript. NC, JS, and QC performed the data analyses. WF and JZ wrote the source code for BGVD. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31822052), and the National Thousand Youth Talents Plan, China (Grant No. Z111021502) awarded to YJ. The project was also supported by the National Beef Cattle and Yak Industrial Technology System, China (Grant No. CARS-37) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31872317) awarded to CL.

Handled by Songnian Hu

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Genetics Society of China.

References

  • 1.Felius M., Koolmees P.A., Theunissen B., Lenstra J.A. On the breeds of cattle—historic and current classifications. Diversity. 2011;3:660–692. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Daetwyler H.D., Capitan A., Pausch H., Stothard P., Van Binsbergen R., Brondum R.F. Whole-genome sequencing of 234 bulls facilitates mapping of monogenic and complex traits in cattle. Nat Genet. 2014;46:858–865. doi: 10.1038/ng.3034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim J., Hanotte O., Mwai O., Dessie T., Bashir S., Diallo B. The genome landscape of indigenous African cattle. Genome Biol. 2017;18:34. doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1153-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stothard P., Liao X., Arantes A.S., De Pauw M., Coros C., Plastow G. A large and diverse collection of bovine genome sequences from the Canadian Cattle Genome Project. GigaScience. 2015;4:49. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0090-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chen N., Cai Y., Chen Q., Li R., Wang K., Huang Y. Whole-genome resequencing reveals world-wide ancestry and adaptive introgression events of domesticated cattle in East Asia. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2337. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04737-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cunningham F., Achuthan P., Akanni W., Allen J., Amode M.R., Armean I.M. Ensembl 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;47:745–751. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hayes B.J., MacLeod I.M., Daetwyler H.D., Phil B.J., Chamberlain A.J., Vander Jagt C.J. Genomic prediction from whole genome sequence in livestock: the 1000 bull genomes project. 10th World Cong Genet Appl Livestock Produc (WCGALP) 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Song S., Tian D., Li C., Tang B., Dong L., Xiao J. Genome Variation Map: a data repository of genome variations in BIG Data Center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:944–949. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Elsik C.G., Unni D., Diesh C., Tayal A., Emery M.L., Nguyen H.N. Bovine Genome Database: new tools for gleaning function from the Bos taurus genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:834–839. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Childers C.P., Reese J.T., Sundaram J.P., Vile D.C., Dickens C.M., Childs K.L. Bovine Genome Database: integrated tools for genome annotation and discovery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:830–834. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nei M., Li W. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:5269–5273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rubin C., Zody M.C., Eriksson J., Meadows J.R.S., Sherwood E., Webster M.T. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature. 2010;464:587–591. doi: 10.1038/nature08832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Voight B.F., Kudaravalli S., Wen X., Pritchard J.K. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:446–458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of populaition structure. Evolution. 1984;38:1358–1370. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sabeti P.C., Varilly P., Fry B., Lohmueller J., Hostetter E., Cotsapas C. Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature. 2007;449:913–918. doi: 10.1038/nature06250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen H., Patterson N., Reich D. Population differentiation as a test for selective sweeps. Genome Res. 2010;20:393–402. doi: 10.1101/gr.100545.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Heaton MP, Smith TPL, Carnahan JK, Basnayake V, Qiu J, Simpson B, et al. Using diverse U.S. beef cattle genomes to identify missense mutations in EPAS1, a gene associated with pulmonary hypertension. F1000Res 2016;5:2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Bickhart D.M., Xu L., Hutchison J.L., Cole J.B., Null D.J., Schroeder S.G. Diversity and population-genetic properties of copy number variations and multicopy genes in cattle. DNA Res. 2016;23:253–262. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsw013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shin D., Lee H.J., Cho S., Kim H.J., Hwang J.Y., Lee C. Deleted copy number variation of Hanwoo and Holstein using next generation sequencing at the population level. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:240. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tsuda K., Kawaharamiki R., Sano S., Imai M., Noguchi T., Inayoshi Y. Abundant sequence divergence in the native Japanese cattle Mishima-Ushi (Bos taurus) detected using whole-genome sequencing. Genomics. 2013;102:372–378. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2013.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kawaharamiki R., Tsuda K., Shiwa Y., Araikichise Y., Matsumoto T., Kanesaki Y. Whole-genome resequencing shows numerous genes with nonsynonymous SNPs in the Japanese native cattle Kuchinoshima-Ushi. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li H. Exploring single-sample SNP and INDEL calling with whole-genome de novo assembly. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1838–1844. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mckenna A., Hanna M., Banks E., Sivachenko A., Cibulskis K., Kernytsky A.M. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Browning S.R., Browning B.L. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:1084–1097. doi: 10.1086/521987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cingolani P., Platts A.E., Wang L.L., Coon M., Nguyen T., Wang L. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. 2012;6:80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Purcell S., Neale B.M., Toddbrown K., Thomas L., Ferreira M.A.R., Bender D. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559–575. doi: 10.1086/519795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang X., Zheng Z., Cai Y., Chen T., Li C., Fu W. CNVcaller: highly efficient and widely applicable software for detecting copy number variations in large populations. GigaScience. 2017;6:1–12. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang K., Li M., Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Casper J., Zweig A.S., Villarreal C., Tyner C., Speir M.L., Rosenbloom K.R. The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:762–769. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Patterson N., Price A.L., Reich D. Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2006;2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alexander D.H., Novembre J., Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009;19:1655–1664. doi: 10.1101/gr.094052.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Geer L.Y., Marchlerbauer A., Geer R.C., Han L., He J., He S. The NCBI BioSystems database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:492–496. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bouwman A.C., Daetwyler H.D., Chamberlain A.J., Ponce C.H., Sargolzaei M., Schenkel F.S. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for cattle stature identifies common genes that regulate body size in mammals. Nat Genet. 2018;50:362–367. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0056-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu G.E., Brown T., Hebert D.A., Cardone M.F., Hou Y., Choudhary R.K. Initial analysis of copy number variations in cattle selected for resistance or susceptibility to intestinal nematodes. Mamm Genome. 2011;22:111–121. doi: 10.1007/s00335-010-9308-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ramey H.R., Decker J.E., Mckay S.D., Rolf M.M., Schnabel R.D., Taylor J.F. Detection of selective sweeps in cattle using genome-wide SNP data. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:382. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Portoneto L.R., Sonstegard T.S., Liu G.E., Bickhart D.M., Silva M.V.G.B.D., Machado M.A. Genomic divergence of zebu and taurine cattle identified through high-density SNP genotyping. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:876. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gibbs R., Taylor J., Van Tassel C., Barendse W., Eversole K., Gill C. Genome-wide survey of SNP variation uncovers the genetic structure of cattle breeds. Science. 2009;324:528–532. doi: 10.1126/science.1167936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

BGVD is publicly available at http://animal.nwsuaf.edu.cn/BosVar.


Articles from Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES