Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Poultry Science logoLink to Poultry Science
. 2020 Aug 26;99(11):6196–6204. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.012

Effects of manganese and Bacillus subtilis on the reproductive performance, egg quality, antioxidant capacity, and gut microbiota of breeding geese during laying period

Yang Wang ∗, Hefei Wang ∗, Baowei Wang †, Beibei Zhang ∗, Wenli Li ∗,1
PMCID: PMC7647850  PMID: 33142537

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of manganese (Mn) and Bacillus subtilis (BS) on the production performance, egg quality, antioxidant capacity, and gut microbiota of breeding geese during laying period. A total of 120 forty-six-week-old breeding geese (Wulong) were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 treatment diets formulated to supply 10, 20, and 30 mg/kg Mn with 5 × 109 CFU/kg or 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg BS for a 10-wk trial. Results showed that dietary supplementation with 20 and 30 mg/kg Mn could decrease the daily feed intake (DFI) of geese. Moreover, 30 mg/kg Mn significantly increased the laying rate. Besides, although Mn addition had no obvious effect on egg quality, 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS was found to elevate the hatching egg hatching rate and eggshell thickness. For the serum hormones, 30 mg/kg Mn promoted estradiol secretion, while 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS increased the level of follicle-stimulating hormone. Furthermore, 20 and 30 mg/kg Mn and 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS significantly enhanced the total antioxidant capacity by increasing the activity of total superoxide dismutases or decreasing the content of malondialdehyde. Dietary supplementation with 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS also increased the intestinal villus height and upregulated the abundance of Fusobacteria, Fusobacteriaceae, Fusobacterium, and Faecalibacterium in cecal content. In addition, 20 and 30 mg/kg Mn elevated the levels of Bacteroidetes, Bacteroidaceae, Bacteroides, and Ruminococcaceae but decreased Streptococcaceae. Importantly, an interaction effect was observed between Mn and BS on the DFI, egg mass, average egg size, and the abundance of Bacteroides as well as Faecalibacterium. In conclusion, dietary inclusion of Mn and BS could improve the production performance, egg quality, antioxidant capacity, intestinal structure, as well as gut microbiota. Supplementation of 30 mg/kg Mn and 5.0 × 109 CFU/kg BS provided the optimal effect.

Key words: breeding geese, Bacillus subtilis, gut microbiota, manganese, production performance

Introduction

As one of the essential trace elements in human and animals, manganese (Mn) has an important effect on the reproduction, the carbohydrate metabolism, the maintenance of neurological tissues, and the formation of connective tissues, bone marrow, as well as lipids (Park and Park, 2010). It is also an essential component of key enzymes such as glutamine synthetase, arginase, phosphoenolpyruvate decarboxylase, and mitochondrial superoxide dismutase (Shao et al., 2012). As the Mn level is low in the diet ingredients and the absorption of Mn is also low in the gut, for most poultry, Mn needs to be supplemented in the diet to meet the nutrition requirements (Li et al., 2011). Insufficient dietary Mn may result in the malfunction of reproduction and affect bone growth (Olgun, 2017). In the recent decades, the effects of Mn on the laying performance and egg quality of hens have been widely investigated. Report showed that Mn supplementation can improve the expression of genes encoding proteoglycans and glycoproteins in the eggshell gland, thus increasing the mammillary-knob density during the initial deposition stage of shell formation (Zhang et al., 2018). Besides, 10 mg/kg Mn improved hatchability of hens, 20 mg/kg Mn decreased death embryos, and 40 mg/kg Mn reduced embryos abnormality (Attia et al., 2010). However, studies regarding the role of Mn in the production performance of breeding geese are rare.

Probiotics refer to live nonpathogenic microorganisms, which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer microbial balance, particularly in the gastrointestinal tract (Ayasan et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2017a). Probiotics have been used in many poultry production settings. It is reported that probiotics can improve body weight gain, immune function, intestinal health, and antioxidant ability and reduce the mortality in chickens, ducks, and geese (Jin et al., 1998; Ayasan, 2013; Chen et al., 2013; Rajput et al., 2013; Inci and Ayasan, 2019). Bacillus species, including Bacillus subtilis (BS), are spore-forming bacteria and produce various enzymes such as protease, amylase, and lipase; thus, BS are ideally suited as feed additives (Wang et al., 2017a). BS was found to improve the production and egg quality of hens (Guo et al., 2017; Prazdnova et al., 2019), but little is known about the effects of BS on geese.

Previously, our research indicated that the dietary Mn supplemental level of breeding geese during laying period is 24.27 to 32.91 mg/kg (Wang et al., 2019a). As BS also improves the reproductive performance, in the present study, we aimed to explore the synergetic effects of Mn and BS on the production performance and egg quality of breeding geese. Furthermore, the antioxidant capacity, intestinal morphology, and gut microbiota were measured.

Materials and methods

Study Design

A 10-wk experiment was conducted in a 3 × 2 factorial design by formulating six dietary treatments using 3 levels of Mn (10, 20, and 30 mg/kg) and 2 levels of BS (2.5 × 109 and 5 × 109 CFU/kg) (Table 1). A total of 120 breeding Wulong geese, 46 wk of age, were provided by the High Quality Waterfowl Research Institute of Qingdao Agricultural University. Geese were randomly divided into six groups, each of which had 4 replicates of 5 geese (male:female = 1:4). The MnSO4·H2O (active ingredient content 98%) was purchased from Puxing Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China). During the experimental period, birds were fed the diets ad libitum twice daily in the morning and evening, respectively, and allowed free access to water with a supplementary artificial light to 16 h. The experiment was carried out in accordance with the Chinese guidelines for animal welfare and approved by the animal welfare committee of College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University (March 12, 2018).

Table 1.

Treatment of the experiment.

Treatment Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ
Mn (mg/kg) 10 20 30 10 20 30
Bacillus subtilis (CFU/Kg) 5 × 109 5 × 109 5 × 109 2.5 × 109 2.5 × 109 2.5 × 109
Open in a new tab

Diets and Bacterial Strains

All geese were fed the same basal diet (Supplementary Table 1) as defined by the NRC (1994) to which Mn and BS were added to derive treatments. BS powders (2 × 1010 CFU/kg) were purchased from Puxing Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China). BS powders were added to the basal diet at levels of 2.5 × 109 and 5 × 109 CFU/kg. The experimental diet was stored in a dry and well-ventilated storeroom.

Laying Performance and Egg Quality

Daily feed intake (DFI), egg mass (EM), number of eggs, and number of qualified eggs were recorded daily. Average egg size (AES), average daily feed intake, and feed conversion ratio were calculated. During the experimental period, 12 eggs from each group (5 from each replicate) were collected to assess egg quality parameters. Egg shape index (ESI), eggshell strength (ES), eggshell thickness (ET), yolk color (YC), egg protein height (EPH), Haugh units (HU), and yolk rate (YR) were measured with a digital egg tester after eggs were weighed and cracked open within 48 h. Besides, 20 eggs from each group (5 from each replicate) were collected for hatching. Number of eggs into hatch, number of infertile eggs, number of dead embryos, hatching number, number of healthy goslings, and number of weak goslings were recorded weekly. Then, the laying rate (LR), hatching egg qualified rate (HEQR), hatching egg fertilization rate (HEFR), hatching egg hatching rate (HEHR), and healthy rate were calculated. LR = total number of eggs produced/total number of hens reared; HEQR = total number of qualified eggs/total number of hatching eggs; HEFR = the fertilization rate of hatching eggs; HEHR = total number of hatching/total number of hatching eggs; healthy rate = total number of healthy chicks/total number of chicks.

Blood Sampling

At the end of the experiment, after 12 h of feed withdrawal, blood samples of 2 female geese per replicate were drawn from the axillary vein into vacuum tubes (5 mL) containing coagulant and centrifuged for 10 min (3,000 × g) at 4°C. Pure serum samples were collected and stored in sterilized 1.5-mL Eppendorf tubes at −80°C (Wang et al., 2017b).

Antioxidant Capacity Analysis

Assay kits for total superoxide dismutases (T-SOD), total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), malondialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) were obtained from the Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China), and levels of each parameters were measured by spectrophotometric methods using a spectrophotometer according to manufacture's protocols.

Serum Hormone Determination

Concentrations of serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol (E2), and prolactin (PRL) were measured by ELISA with commercial kits provided by Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China) according to manufacture's protocol.

Intestinal Histological Structure Analysis

At the end of the experiment, a medullary section of duodenum from 3 female geese of each replicate were fixed in 10% buffered formaldehyde for 24 h. Tissue samples were later embedded in paraffin, and the section of each sample was placed on a glass slide and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The villus was observed under a OLYMPUS microscope (OLYMPUS, Japan) using the HMIAS-2000 software. Villus height (VH) equals to the length from the top of the villus to the villus crypt junction. Crypt depth (CD) equals to the depth of the invagination between adjacent villus (Shan et al., 2019).

Cecal Content DNA Extraction and 16S rDNA Sequencing

Cecal content from 3 female geese of each replicate were collected. The genomic DNA from cecal content was extracted using a TIANamp Stool DNA Kit according to the manufacturer's protocols (Tiangen Biotech, China). The V3/V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the universal primers 341F and 805R, and 16S rDNA sequencing was performed by Annoroad Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). All the DNA data sets have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive database (accession number: PRJNA604688).

Taxonomic Classification

Microbial operational taxonomic units were derived from the trimmed sequences of the PCR amplicon for the V3/V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene; the sequencing data were analyzed by using quantitative insights into microbial ecology (http://qiime.org/index.html). The operational taxonomic units were classified at the phylum, class, family, and genus level. Alpha-diversity analysis was calculated for all the samples (Wang et al., 2019b).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed by the general linear model using the SPSS20.0 statistical software, and the significance analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan multiple-range test. The data were expressed by the least squares mean and SEM. The values with a P value <0.05 were considered significant, and those with a P value <0.01 were considered extremely significant.

Results

Effects of Mn and BS on the Production Performance and Egg Quality

Based on Table 2, Mn addition did not alter EM, feed-egg ration (F/E), and AES significantly (P > 0.05); however, compared with the Mn at 10 mg/kg, Mn at 20 or 30 mg/kg significantly decreased the DFI of geese (P < 0.01). Moreover, there were no obvious differences in DFI, EM, F/E, and AES with BS treatment (P > 0.05). Nevertheless, the interaction between Mn and BS had significant effects on DFI (P < 0.05), EM (P < 0.01), and AES (P < 0.05).

Table 2.

Effects of Mn and BS on the laying performance of breeding geese during laying period.

Group Mn (mg/Kg) BS (CFU/Kg) DFI (g) EM (g) F/E AES (g)
I 10 5 × 109 189.20a 21.07 8.12 131.40
II 20 5 × 109 156.50c 24.61 6.94 128.08
III 30 5 × 109 162.18c 23.98 7.01 131.71
IV 10 2.5 × 109 170.82a 28.18 6.74 129.49
V 20 2.5 × 109 169.89c 21.85 7.19 132.11
VI 30 2.5 × 109 167.08c 22.69 7.25 135.84
10 180.00a 24.62 7.43 130.44
20 163.20c 23.23 7.07 130.01
30 164.63c 23.33 37.13 133.77
5 × 109 169.29 23.21 7.35 130.40
2.5 × 109 169.27 24.24 7.06 132.49
SEM 13.66 3.10 0.80 5.83
P value Mn 0.006 0.407 0.595 0.276
BS 0.995 0.281 0.347 0.212
Mn × BS 0.015 0.001 0.069 0.038
Open in a new tab

In the same column, values with the same small or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), while with adjacent small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.05), and with alternate small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.01).

Abbreviations: AES, average egg size; BS, Bacillus subtilis; DFI, daily feed intake; EM, egg mass. F/E, feed-egg ratio.

Then, the reproduction performance of geese was further analyzed. Table 3 indicates that Mn had no significant influence on HEQR, HEFR, HEHR, and HEIR (P > 0.05), but 30 mg/kg Mn could increase LR compared with the Mn at lower levels (10, 20 mg/kg) (P < 0.05). Besides, BS addition did not affect LR, HEQR, HEFR, and HEHR obviously (P > 0.05), but BS of 5 × 109 CFU/kg significantly increased HEHR compared with that of 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg (P < 0.05). However, the interaction between Mn and BS had no significant influence on LR, HEQR, HEFR, HEHR, and HEIR (P > 0.05).

Table 3.

Effects of Mn and BS on the reproductive performance of breeding geese during laying period.

Group Mn (mg/Kg) BS (CFU/Kg) LR (%) HEQR (%) HEFR (%) HEHR (%) HR (%)
I 10 5 × 109 37.76b 93.75 83.75 93.47a 91.15
II 20 5 × 109 36.48b 92.50 90.00 90.91a 89.52
III 30 5 × 109 38.84a 95.00 88.75 94.72a 90.34
IV 10 2.5 × 109 34.28b 97.50 81.25 89.58b 90.08
V 20 2.5 × 109 35.18b 93.75 87.50 88.05b 89.67
VI 30 2.5 × 109 38.93a 92.50 90.00 86.28b 93.74
10 36.02b 95.62 82.50 27.62 90.61
20 35.80b 93.13 88.75 89.48 89.59
30 38.88a 93.75 89.37 91.52 92.03
5 × 109 37.70a 93.75 87.50 93.04a 90.33
2.5 × 109 36.10a 94.58 86.25 87.97b 91.16
SEM 0.29 0.57 0.46 0.26 0.59
P value Mn 0.013 0.723 0.272 0.731 0.752
BS 0.074 0.753 0.741 0.026 0.758
Mn × BS 0.278 0.624 0.894 0.523 0.778
Open in a new tab

In the same column, values with the same small or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), while with adjacent small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.05), and with alternate small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.01).

Abbreviations: BS, Bacillus subtilis; HEFR, hatching egg fertilization rate; HEHR, hatching egg hatching rate; HEQR, hatching egg qualified rate; HR, healthy rate; LR, laying rate.

Thereafter, we measured the egg quality and found that different levels of Mn and the interaction between Mn and BS did not change the ESI, ES, ET, EPH, YC, HU, and YR dramatically (P > 0.05). BS treatment also had no significant effects on ESI, ES, EPH, YC, HU, and YR (P > 0.05), but geese receiving 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS had a higher ET than the geese receiving 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg BS (P < 0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Effects of Mn and BS on the quality of goose egg during laying period.

Group Mn (mg/Kg) BS (CFU/Kg) ESI ES (Kg) ET (mm) EPH YC HU YR (%)
I 10 5 × 109 1.47 5.078 0.52a 14.57 3.03 112.48 42.57
II 20 5 × 109 1.46 5.029 0.51a 15.23 2.83 118.30 37.76
III 30 5 × 109 1.52 5.126 0.52a 16.18 2.63 120.18 41.52
IV 10 2.5 × 109 1.47 4.284 0.47b 16.13 3.65 119.90 43.90
V 20 2.5 × 109 1.50 5.085 0.48b 15.23 3.55 112.20 39.81
VI 30 2.5 × 109 1.49 5.122 0.49b 16.25 2.90 119.78 42.93
10 1.47 4.681 0.49 15.35 3.34 116.19 43.28
20 1.47 5.052 0.50 14.71 3.19 115.25 38.78
30 1.51 5.124 0.53 16.21 2.76 119.98 42.45
5 × 109 1.48 5.074 0.52a 15.32 2.83 116.98 40.63
2.5 × 109 1.48 4.830 0.49b 15.52 3.37 117.21 41.46
SEM 0.08 0.47 0.06 2.49 0.74 9.54 5.66
P value Mn 0.621 0.093 0.514 0.536 0.271 0.615 0.330
BS 0.893 0.160 0.039 0.855 0.079 0.941 0.571
Mn × BS 0.560 0.092 0.628 0.629 0.804 0.417 0.980
Open in a new tab

In the same column, values with the same small or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), while with adjacent small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.05), and with alternate small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.01).

Abbreviations: BS, Bacillus subtilis; EPH, egg protein height; ES, eggshell strength; ESI, egg shape index; ET, eggshell thickness; HU, Haugh units; YR, yolk rate; YC, yolk color.

Effects of Mn and BS on the Serum Hormone

In the present study, Mn supplementation had no significant effects on FSH and PRL levels (P > 0.05). However, geese receiving 30 mg/kg Mn showed an increased E2 content (P < 0.01) compared with those receiving 10 and 20 mg/kg Mn. In addition, 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS significantly enhanced FSH secretion (P < 0.05) compared with the BS at 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg. But, BS addition had no obvious influence on PRL and E2 (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the interaction between Mn and BS did not affect these hormones significantly (P > 0.05) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Effects of Mn and BS on the serum hormone of breeding geese during laying period.

Group Mn (mg/Kg) BS (CFU/Kg) FSH (mIU/mL) PRL (mIU/L) E2 (pg/mL)
I 10 5 × 109 2.73a 267.42 209.39c
II 20 5 × 109 3.18a 277.03 200.34c
III 30 5 × 109 3.26a 299.12 240.02a
IV 10 2.5 × 109 2.51b 273.65 186.67c
V 20 2.5 × 109 2.69b 274.20 204.59c
VI 30 2.5 × 109 2.77b 287.18 228.58a
10 2.62 270.53 198.03c
20 2.94 275.6 220.44c
30 3.02 293.15 234.30a
5 × 109 3.06a 281.19 216.57
2.5 × 109 2.67b 278.33 206.61
SEM 0.43 28.73 23.06
P value Mn 0.110 0.313 <0.01
BS 0.019 0.820 0.146
Mn × BS 0.705 0.835 0.245
Open in a new tab

In the same column, values with the same small or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), while with adjacent small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.05), and with alternate small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.01).

Abbreviations: BS, Bacillus subtilis; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; PRL, prolactin.

Effects of Mn and BS on the Antioxidant Capacity

According to Table 6, Mn addition had no significant influence on GSH-Px activity and MDA level (P > 0.05). However, compared with 10 mg/kg Mn, 20 and 30 mg/kg Mn were able to increase T-AOC activity (P < 0.05) while 30 mg/kg Mn could elevate the activity of T-SOD (P < 0.05). Moreover, BS administration had no obvious effects on the activities of GSH-Px and T-SOD (P > 0.05), but a higher level of BS increased the T-AOC and decreased MDA (P < 0.01) compared with the BS at a lower level. Besides, there was no interaction between Mn and BS for all the antioxidation-related parameters tested (P > 0.05).

Table 6.

Effects of Mn and BS on the antioxidant function of breeding geese during laying period.

Group Mn (mg/Kg) BS (CFU/Kg) T-AOC (U/mL) GSH-Px (U/mL) MDA (nmol/mL) T-SOD (U/mL)
I 10 5 × 109 12.16b 227.49 9.34c 319.00b
II 20 5 × 109 12.31a 236.27 9.27c 273.75b
III 30 5 × 109 13.30a 248.83 8.53c 358.75a
IV 10 2.5 × 109 10.14b 228.64 10.56a 314.32b
V 20 2.5 × 109 11.34a 234.35 9.49a 300.73b
VI 30 2.5 × 109 12.96a 240.54 9.20a 339.60a
10 11.15b 228.01 9.95 316.10b
20 11.83a 235.31 9.38 287.25b
30 13.13a 244.67 8.89 349.17a
5 × 109 12.59a 237.53 9.05c 317.17
2.5 × 109 11.15c 234.51 9.76a 318.11
SEM 8.13 35.64 5.80 55.99
P value Mn 0.016 0.053 0.067 0.034
BS <0.01 0.376 <0.01 0.964
Mn × BS 0.312 0.073 0.183 0.661
Open in a new tab

In the same column, values with the same small or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), while with adjacent small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.05), and with alternate small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.01).

Abbreviations: BS, Bacillus subtilis; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; T-SOD, total superoxide dismutases.

Effects of Mn and BS on the Intestinal Morphology

There was no significant difference in VH, CD, and V/C with different Mn levels in the diets (P > 0.05). However, compared with the BS at 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg, 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS significantly increased the VH (P < 0.01). But the interaction between Mn and BS had no obvious effects on VH, CD, and V/C (P > 0.05) (Table 7).

Table 7.

Effects of Mn and BS on the intestinal structure of breeding geese during laying period.

Group Mn (mg/Kg) BS (CFU/Kg) VH (μm) CD (μm) V/C
I 10 5 × 109 601.84a 101.66 5.95
II 20 5 × 109 650.18a 105.11 6.19
III 30 5 × 109 603.28a 87.19 7.52
IV 10 2.5 × 109 577.57c 91.66 6.40
V 20 2.5 × 109 539.31c 104.67 5.15
VI 30 2.5 × 109 548.94c 110.70 5.48
10 589.71 96.66 6.17
20 594.75 104.89 5.67
30 576.10 93.95 6.50
5 × 109 618.44a 97.99 6.55
2.5 × 109 555.27c 99.01 5.67
SEM 55.26 13.03 1.38
P value Mn 0.644 0.218 0.450
BS <0.01 0.843 0.114
Mn × BS 0.124 0.197 0.182
Open in a new tab

In the same column, values with the same small or no letter superscripts mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), while with adjacent small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.05), and with alternate small letter superscripts mean significant difference (P < 0.01).

Abbreviations: BS, Bacillus subtilis; CD, crypt depth; VH, villus height.

Overall Structural Modulation of the Gut Microbiota after Mn and BS Treatment

A-diversity (richness and evenness) of the communities was measured by Chao1's, Simpson's, Shannon's, and Coverage's indexes, respectively. However, Mn, BS, or the interaction between Mn and BS had no significant influence on the a-diversity tested (P > 0.05) (Table 8). Histograms illustrating the gut microbiota structure revealed the microbial species and their relative abundance (Figure 1). At phylum level, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Proteobacteria were accounted for the majority. Interestingly, 20 and 30 mg/kg Mn could increase Bacteroidetes relative abundance (P < 0.05) compared with Mn at 10 mg/kg. Moreover, the relative level of Bacteroidetes was downregulated by 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS (P < 0.05), while the relative level of Fusobacteria was upregulated by 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS (P < 0.01) compared with the BS at 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg (Figure 1, Supplementary Table 2). At class level, Mn at 20 and 30 mg/kg significantly increased the abundance of Actinobacteria compared with the Mn at 10 mg/kg (P < 0.05). Moreover, 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS induced higher Fusobacteriia level than 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg BS (Figure 1, Supplementary Table 3). At family level, 20 and 30 mg/kg Mn dramatically increased the abundance of Bacteroidaceae and Ruminococcacea but decreased Streptococcaceae compared with the 10 mg/kg Mn (P < 0.05). Fusobacteriaceae level was significantly elevated by 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS compared with the 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg BS (P < 0.01). Moreover, the interaction between Mn and BS also had a significant effect on Bacteroidaceae (P < 0.05) (Figure 1, Supplementary Table 4). Then, at genus level, 20 and 30 mg/kg Mn induced more Bacteroides than Mn at 10 mg/kg (P < 0.05), and 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS induced more Faecalibacterium and Fusobacterium than BS at 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the interaction between Mn and BS also obviously affected the abundance of Bacteroides and Faecalibacterium (P < 0.05) (Figure 1, Supplementary Table 5).

Table 8.

Changes in α-diversity of gut microbiota communities.

Group Mn (mg/Kg) Bacillus subtilis (BS) (CFU/Kg) Chao1 index Simpson index Shannon index Coverage
I 10 5 × 109 1685.76 0.704 4.48 0.9889
II 20 5 × 109 1988.49 0.874 4.27 0.9871
III 30 5 × 109 1753.85 0.586 4.36 0.9875
IV 10 2.5 × 109 2123.28 0.371 4.95 0.9882
V 20 2.5 × 109 1582.37 0.456 4.46 0.9915
VI 30 2.5 × 109 1992.54 0.292 4.87 0.9891
10 1904.52 0.537 4.72 0.9886
20 1785.43 0.665 4.37 0.9893
30 1873.15 0.439 4.62 0.9883
5 × 109 1809.37 0.721 4.37 0.9878
2.5 × 109 1899.40 0.373 4.77 0.9896
SEM 457.82 0.37 0.57 0.04
P value Mn 0.910 0.068 0.601 0.925
BS 0.704 0.582 0.192 0.428
Mn × BS 0.333 0.957 0.873 0.632
Open in a new tab

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Changes in the cecal content community at the phylum level, class level, family level, and genus level.

Discussion

In the present study, we first explored the effects of Mn and BS on the production performance of breeding geese during laying period. Results showed that 20 and 30 mg/kg Mn decreased the DFI, while 30 mg/kg Mn and 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS increased the LR as well as HEHR, indicating that Mn and BS played an important role in improving the production performance of breeding geese. It is known that the reproduction performance can be regulated by hormones. Mn is one of the enzyme cofactors involved in the synthesis of cholesterol (Ismail, 2018), a main structure of ovarian steroids. Dietary deficiency of Mn influenced the circulating ovarian steroids in layer hens (Olgun, 2017). BS was also reported to effectively improve the laying performance of poultry (Li et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017). In the present study, we also noticed that 30 mg/kg Mn increased the level of E2, and 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS enhanced the secretion of FSH. In avian species, FSH stimulates the maturation of granulosa cells, playing an important role in the course of follicular development and ovulation (Scanes, 2000; Long et al., 2017). Thus, the increased production performance of breeding geese may be due to the elevated E2 and FSH secretions induced by Mn and BS.

In addition, Mn plays a role in eggshell quality by promoting the synthesis of mucopolysaccharides (Qiu et al., 2019). However, in the present study, the egg quality was not significantly altered by the supplementation of Mn. In the study by Inal et al. (2001), diet supplementation with 25 mg/kg Mn was shown to increase the egg production, egg weight, and feed conversion ratio, but for the optimal eggshell quality, the requirement of laying hens was suggested to be much higher. Thus, higher dosage of Mn may promote eggshell quality of geese more significantly. Giving probiotics to laying hens has been found to improve eggshell quality and reduce the number of damaged eggs (Mikulski et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012). In this study, the ET was also significantly increased in geese receiving 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS.

Mn participates in the antioxidant protection as it is an integral part of Mn-superoxide dismutase (Zhu et al., 2015). Accordingly, here, the T-SOD activity was elevated as the additive dosage of Mn increased to 30 mg/kg, leading to the increase of T-AOC. MDA is the end product of lipid oxidation. Probiotics can elevate the antioxidant ability of hosts through enhancing the expression of antioxidases, increasing the level of antioxidant metabolites, or decreasing the activities of enzymes producing ROS (Wang et al., 2017a). Here, we also found that 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS significantly decreased the content of MDA and increased the T-AOC. Therefore, the aforementioned findings imply that 30 mg/kg Mn or 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS could enhance the antioxidant capacity of breeding geese.

It has been reported that intestinal health, including the intestinal microbiota, is related to the reproduction and antioxidation of animals (Czarnecki-Maulden, 2008; Abdelqader et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2017a). Thus, the effects of Mn and BS on the intestinal morphology and microbiota were investigated. Although Mn had no significant effect on the intestinal structure, a high level of BS obviously elevated the VH of duodenum, which is similar to the results of other studies (Samanya and Yamanuchi, 2002; Sen et al., 2012). Moreover, In the recent studies, dietary Mn has been found to affect the fecal microbial relative abundance (Chi et al., 2017; Faulkner et al., 2017). Besides, probiotic was able to regulate physiological functions and diseases by regulating the intestinal microbiota composition. For example, B. subtilis DSM 32315 induced greater abundance of Lactobacillaceae family members and Lactobacillus salivarius than control in broilers with necrotic enteritis challenge (Whelan et al., 2018). In the ceca of broilers fed with B. subtilis CGMCC 1.1086, the relative abundance of Alistipes, Odoribacter, Ruminococcus, Blautia, and Desulfovibrio was higher, while the potential pathogens such as Staphylococcus and Escherichia-Shigella were lower than those of control (Li et al., 2016). In the present study, although the α-diversity of gut microbiota communities was not altered by Mn and BS, changes in the cecal content community were noticed. The gram-positive Bacteroideses phylum, the Bacteroidaceae family, and Bacteroides genus were upregulated by high dosages of Mn addition (20 or 30 mg/kg). Bacteroides genus was also infected by the interaction between Mn and BS. Sergeant et al. (2014) discovered more than 500 polysaccharide utilization systems in bacteria of the Bacteriodetes phylum that were present in the chicken cecum. Members of the Bacteroides genus are found to have a broad saccharolytic potential as they can metabolize a variety of plant- and animal-derived glycans (Thomas et al., 2011; Pfefferle and Renz, 2014). Thus, the degraders of resistant polysaccharides can contribute to improved performance (Chalvatzi et al., 2016) in high-Mn groups. It is reported that Streptococcaceae has been associated with colon cancer (Abdulamir et al., 2011). Actinobacteria might be used as a nutritional tool in terrestrial animals (Vinothini et al., 2018). Besides, Ruminococcaceae was considered to be related to intestinal barrier recovery (Olguín-Calderón et al., 2019). In the present study, the abundance of Actinobacteria and Ruminococcaceae were increased, while Streptococcaceae was decreased by 20 and 30 mg/kg Mn. In addition, we also found that 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS significantly augmented the abundance of Fusobacteria phylum, Fusobacteriia class, Fusobacteriaceae family, and Fusobacterium genus. Studies have shown that Fusobacteria activate host inflammatory responses to protect against pathogens that promote tumor growth (Kelly et al., 2018). Moreover, in a recent study, Sun et al. (2018) have compared the gut microbial composition of 2 chicken breeds in different rearing patterns. Results showed that Fusobacteria was only detected in the cecal samples of Partridge Shank chickens in free-range group. As far as the author concerned, the uniqueness of Fusobacteria to Partridge Shank chickens may play a role in cecal digestion. In addition, Faecalibacterium genus was also induced by 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS, and an interaction effect between Mn and BS was found on the abundance of Faecalibacterium. Faecalibacterium, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, are among the major butyrate producers in human colon (Louis and Flint, 2009), as well as in broilers' cecum (Bjerrum et al., 2006). Besides, F. prausnitzii was also reported to regulate the balance of immunity and protect against colitis in mice (Miquel et al., 2013). In this study, although we did not examine the inflammation status of geese, lots of evidence indicates that the administration of BS can reduce inflammation of poultry (Rajput et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2018). Hence, we conjecture that the increased Faecalibacterium may regulate the immunity of breeding geese to improve the production performance.

In conclusion, data in this study imply that the combinational supplementation of Mn and BS effectively increased the production performance, egg quality, antioxidant capacity, and gut microbiota of geese during laying period. Moreover, in the context of this research experiment, dietary addition of 30 mg/kg Mn and 5.0 × 109 CFU/kg BS is an optimal combination for improving reproductive performance in breeder geese. Noticeably, 30 mg/kg Mn and 5 × 109 CFU/kg BS also had beneficial effects for intestinal health through the regulation of gut microbiota. Given the favorable alteration of the cecal microbial community, it is possible that these bacteria can consecutively contribute to improved production performance of breeding geese.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Waterfowl Industrial Technology System (CARS-43-11), the National Key Research and Development Project (2018YFD0501501), and the Doctoral Science Research Startup Funding of Qingdao Agricultural University (663/1119042).

Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.012.

Supplementary data

Supplementary Tables
mmc1.docx (36.5KB, docx)

References

  1. Abdelqader A., Al-Fataftah A.R., Das G. Effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis and inulin supplementation on performance, eggshell quality, intestinal morphology and microflora composition of laying hens in the late phase of production. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 2013;179:103–111. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdulamir A.S., Hafidh R.R., Abu Bakar F. The association of Streptococcus bovis/gallolyticus with colorectal tumors: the nature and the underlying mechanisms of its etiological role. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011;30:11. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Attia Y.A., Qota E.M., Bovera F., Tag El-Din A.E., Mansour S.A. Effect of amount and source of manganese and/or phytase supplementation on productive and reproductive performance and some physiological traits of dual purpose cross-bred hens in the tropics. Br. Poult. Sci. 2010;51:235–245. doi: 10.1080/00071661003786111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayasan T., Ozcan B.D., Baylan M., Canogullari S. The effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic protexin on egg yield parameters of Japanese Quails (Coturnix coturnix Japonica) Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006;5:776–779. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayasan T. Effects of dietary inclusion of protexin (probiotic) on hatchability of Japanese quails. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 2013;83:78–81. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bjerrum L., Engberg R.M., Leser T.D., Jensen B.B., Finster K., Pedersen K. Microbial community composition of the ileum and cecum of broiler chickens as revealed by molecular and culture-based techniques. Poult. Sci. 2006;85:1151–1164. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.7.1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chalvatzi S., Kalamaki M.S., Arsenos G., Fortomaris P. Dietary supplementation with the clay mineral palygorskite affects performance and beneficially modulates caecal microbiota in laying pullets. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016;120:1033–1040. doi: 10.1111/jam.13041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen W., Zhu X.Z., Wang J.P., Wang Z.X., Huang Y.Q. Effects of Bacillus subtilis var. natto and Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermented liquid feed on growth performance, relative organ weight, intestinal microflora, and organ antioxidant status in Landes geese. J. Anim. Sci. 2013;91:978–985. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chi L., Gao B., Bian X.M., Tu P.C., Ru H.Y., Lu K. Manganese-induced sex-specific gut microbiome perturbations in C57BL/6 mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2017;331:142–153. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2017.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Czarnecki-Maulden G.L. Effect of dietary modulation of intestinal microbiota on reproduction and early growth. Theriogenology. 2008;70:286–290. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.05.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Faulkner M.J., Wenner B.A., Solden L.M., Weiss W.P. Source of supplemental dietary copper, zinc, and manganese affects fecal microbial relative abundance in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2017;100:1037–1044. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo J.R., Dong X.F., Liu S., Tong J.M. Effects of long-term Bacillus subtilis CGMCC 1.921 supplementation on performance, egg quality, and fecal and cecal microbiota of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2017;96:1280–1289. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Inal F.B., Coskun N. Gulsen, Kurtoglu V. The effects of withdrawal of vitamin and trace mineral supplements from layer diets on egg yield and trace mineral composition. Br. Poult. Sci. 2001;42:77–80. doi: 10.1080/713655024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Inci H., Ayasan T. ISPEC 2. Uluslararasi Tarim Ve Kirsal Kalkinma Kongresi; Kiev-UKRAYNA: 2019. The Effect of Probiotic Use on Growth Performance and Some Blood Parameters in Japanese Quail Exposed to Temperature Stress. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ismail H.T.H. Hematobiochemical disturbances and oxidative stress after subacute manganese chloride exposure and potential protective effects of ebselen in rats. Biol. Trace. Elem. Rese. 2018;187:452–463. doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1395-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jin L.Z., Ho Y.W., Abdullah N., Jalaludin S. Growth performance, intestinal microbial populations, and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poult. Sci. 1998;77:1259–1265. doi: 10.1093/ps/77.9.1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kelly D., Yang L., Pei Z. Gut microbiota, fusobacteria, and colorectal cancer. Diseases. 2018;6:109. doi: 10.3390/diseases6040109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li S., Lu L., Hao S., Wang Y., Zhang L., Liu S., Liu B., Li K., Luo X. Dietary manganese modulates expression of the manganese-containing superoxide dismutase gene in chickens. J. Nutr. 2011;141:189–194. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.126680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li Y., Xu Q., Huang Z., Lv L., Liu X., Yin C., Yan H., Yuan J. Effect of Bacillus subtilis CGMCC 1.1086 on the growth performance and intestinal microbiota of broilers. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016;120:195–204. doi: 10.1111/jam.12972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu J., Xia X.B., Du X., Zeng T., Liu Y., Chen L., Lu L., Li C. Effects of water supplemented with Bacillus subtilis and photosynthetic bacteria on egg production, egg quality, serum immunoglobulins and digestive enzyme activity of ducks. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2017;46:322–326. [Google Scholar]
  21. Long L., Wu S.G., Yuan F., Zhang H.J., Wang J., Qi G.H. Effects of dietary octacosanol supplementation on laying performance, egg quality, serum hormone levels, and expression of genes related to the reproductive axis in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2017;96:894–903. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Louis P., Flint H.J. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009;294:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mikulski D., Jankowski J., Zdunczyk Z., Juskiewicz J., Slominski B. The effect of different dietary levels of rapeseed meal on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in turkeys. Poult. Sci. 2012;91:215–223. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miquel S., Martin R., Rossi O., Bermudez-Humaran L.G., Chatel J.M., Sokol H., Thomas M., Wells J.M., Langella P. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and human intestinal health. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2013;16:255–261. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Olgun O. Manganese in poultry nutrition and its effect on performance and eggshell quality. World Poult. Sci. J. 2017;73:45–56. [Google Scholar]
  26. Olguín-Calderón D., González-Escobar J.L., Ríos-Villa R., Dibildox-Alvarado E., de León-Rodríguez A., de la Rosa A.P.B. Modulation of caecal microbiome in obese mice associated with administration of amaranth or soybean protein isolates. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2019;69:35–44. [Google Scholar]
  27. Park E.J., Park K. Induction of oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines by manganese chloride in cultured T98G cells, human brain glioblastoma cell line. Toxicol. Vitro. 2010;24:472–479. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pfefferle P., Renz H. The mucosal microbiome in shaping health and disease. F1000prime Rep. 2014;6:11. doi: 10.12703/P6-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Prazdnova E.V., Mazanko M.S., Chistyakov V.A., Denisenko Y.V., Makarenko M.S., Usatov A.V., Bren A.B., Tutelyan A.V., Komarova Z.B., Gorlov I.F., Weeks R., Chikindas M.L. Effect of Bacillus subtilis KATMIRA1933 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-1895 on the productivity, reproductive aging, and physiological characteristics of hens and roosters. Benef. Microbes. 2019;10:395–412. doi: 10.3920/BM2018.0149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Qiu J., Lu X., Ma L., Hou C., He J., Liu B., Yu D., Lin G., Xu J. Low-dose of organic trace minerals reduced fecal mineral excretion without compromising performance of laying hens. Asian Austral. J. Anim. 2019;33:588–596. doi: 10.5713/ajas.19.0270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rajput I.R., Li W.F., Li Y.L., Jian L., Wang M.Q. Application of probiotic (Bacillus Subtilis) to enhance immunity, antioxidation, digestive enzymes activity and hematological profile of Shaoxing duck. Pak. Vet. J. 2013;33:69–72. [Google Scholar]
  32. Samanya M., Yamauchi K.E. Histological alterations of intestinal villi in chickens fed dried Bacillus subtilis var. Natto. Comp. Biochem. Phys. A. 2002;133:95–104. doi: 10.1016/s1095-6433(02)00121-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Scanes C.G. Introduction to endocrinology: Pituitary gland. In: Whittow G.C., editor. Sturkie’s Avian Physiology. Academic Press; London, UK: 2000. pp. 437–460. [Google Scholar]
  34. Sen S., Ingale S.L., Kim Y.W., Kim J.S., Kim K.H., Lohakare J.D., Kim E.K., Kim H.S., Ryu M.H., Kwon I.K., Char B.J. Effect of supplementation of bacillus subtilis ls 1-2 to broiler diets on growth performance, nutrient retention, caecal microbiology and small intestinal morphology. Res. Vet. Sci. 2012;93:264–268. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sergeant M.J., Constantinidou C., Cogan T.A., Bedford M.R., Penn C.W., Pallen M.J. Extensive microbial and functional diversity within the chicken cecal microbiome. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shao J.J., Yao H.D., Zhang Z.W., Li S., Xu S.W. The disruption of mitochondrial metabolism and ion homeostasis in chicken hearts exposed to manganese. Toxicol. Lett. 2012;214:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shan C., Sun B., Dalloul R.A., Zhai Z., Sun P., Li M., Yang S., Luan W. Effect of the oral administration of astragalus polysaccharides on jejunum mucosal immunity in chickens vaccinated against Newcastle disease. Microb. Pathogenesis. 2019;135:103621. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sun J., Wang Y., Li N.Z., Zhong H., Xu H.Y., Zhu Q., Liu Y.P. Comparative analysis of the gut microbial composition and meat flavor of two chicken breeds in different rearing patterns. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018;2018:4343196. doi: 10.1155/2018/4343196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Thomas F., Hehemann J.H., Rebuffet E., Czjzek M., Michel G. Environmental and gut bacteroidetes: the food connection. Front. Microbiol. 2011;2:93. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vinothini G., Kavitha R., Latha S., Arulmozhi M., Dhanasekaran D. Cell aggregating temperament and biopotency of cultivable indigenous actinobacterial community profile in chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) gut system. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2018;43:3429–3442. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang H.F., Li W.L., Sui F.L., Dai G., Shi J., Wang B.W. Effects of dietary manganese supplemental level on reproductive performance, egg quality, serum reproductive hormone and antioxidant indices of breeding geese during laying period. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2019;31:3095–3102. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang Y., Wu Y., Wang B., Xu H., Mei X., Xu X., Zhang X., Ni J., Li W. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SC06 protects mice against high-fat diet-induced obesity and liver injury via regulating host metabolism and gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1161. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang W.C., Yan F.F., Hu J.Y., Amen O.A., Cheng H.W. Supplementation of Bacillus subtilis based probiotic reduces heat stress-related behaviors and inflammatory response in broiler chickens. J. Anim. Sci. 2018;96:1654–1666. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang Y., Wu Y.P., Wang Y.Y., Xu H., Mei X.Q., Yu D.Y., Wang Y.B., Li W.F. Antioxidant properties of probiotic bacteria. Nutrients. 2017;9:521. doi: 10.3390/nu9050521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang Y., Du W., Lei K., Wang B., Wang Y., Zhou Y., Li W. Effects of dietary Bacillus licheniformis on gut physical barrier, immunity, and reproductive hormones of laying hens. Probiotics Antimicro. Prot. 2017;9:292–299. doi: 10.1007/s12602-017-9252-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Whelan R.A., Doranalli K., Rinttilä T., Vienola K., Jurgens G., Apajalahti J. The impact of Bacillus subtilis DSM 32315 on the pathology, performance, and intestinal microbiome of broiler chickens in a necrotic enteritis challenge. Poult. Sci. 2018;98:3450–3463. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhang Z.F., Zhou T.X., Ao X., Kim I.H. Effects of b-glucan and Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, blood profiles, relative organ weight and meat quality in broilers fed maize soybean meal based diets. Livest. Sci. 2012;150:419–424. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang Y.N., Zhang H.J., Wu S.G., Wang J., Qi G.H. Dietary manganese supplementation affects mammillary knobs of eggshell ultrastructure in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2018;97:1253–1262. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhu Y.W., Lu L., Li W.X., Zhang L.Y., Ji C., Lin X., Liu H.C., Odle J., Luo X.G. Effect of dietary manganese on antioxidant status and expression levels of heat-shock proteins and factors in tissues of laying broiler breeders under normal and high environmental temperatures. Br. J. Nutr. 2015;114:1965–1974. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515003803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Tables
mmc1.docx (36.5KB, docx)

Articles from Poultry Science are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES