Abstract
Background
Pulmonary manifestations are regularly reported in both human and animal filariasis. In human filariasis, the main known lung manifestations are the tropical pulmonary eosinophilia syndrome. Its duration and severity are correlated with the presence of microfilariae. Litomosoides sigmodontis is a filarial parasite residing in the pleural cavity of rodents. This model is widely used to understand the immune mechanisms that are established during infection and for the screening of therapeutic molecules. Some pulmonary manifestations during the patent phase of infection with L. sigmodontis have been described in different rodent hosts more or less permissive to infection.
Methods
Here, the permissive Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) was infected with L. sigmodontis. Prevalence and density of microfilariae and adult parasites were evaluated. Lungs were analyzed for pathological signatures using immunohistochemistry and 3D imaging techniques (two-photon and light sheet microscopy).
Results
Microfilaremia in gerbils was correlated with parasite load, as amicrofilaremic individuals had fewer parasites in their pleural cavities. Fibrotic polypoid structures were observed on both pleurae of infected gerbils. Polyps were of variable size and developed from the visceral mesothelium over the entire pleura. The larger polyps were vascularized and strongly infiltrated by immune cells such as eosinophils, macrophages or lymphocytes. The formation of these structures was induced by the presence of adult filariae since small and rare polyps were observed before patency, but they were exacerbated by the presence of gravid females and microfilariae.
Conclusions
Altogether, these data emphasize the role of host-specific factors in the pathogenesis of filarial infections.
Keywords: Filariasis, Microfilaria, Lung, Polyps, Vascularization, Eosinophils
Background
Many helminth parasites interact with respiratory tissues and the pulmonary immune system. Among them, the filariae Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi and Loa loa (family Onchocercidae) are major human pathogens [1]. They have evolved a circadian behaviour where the offspring, i.e. microfilariae, cycle between circulating in the blood and sequestering in the pulmonary vasculature [2]. In a small number of individuals infected by W. bancrofti and B. malayi, immune hyperreaction to microfilariae induce a syndrome called tropical pulmonary eosinophilia [3–5]. In these patients the microfilariae released in blood circulation become trapped in the pulmonary microcirculation and are cleared. The degenerating larvae release antigenic constituents which trigger an immune response that is characteristic of a Type 2 reaction and induce asthma-like symptoms. In addition, the human filaria Mansonella perstans has been reported to induce pleural effusion in some clinical cases [6–9]. Finally zoonotic Dirofilaria immitis filarial infections often result in pulmonary inflammation and damage due to the migration of larvae and/or adult parasites to the lungs [10–12].
Human filariae are specific to their host. Consequently, the discovery of drugs against filariasis, the study of filarial pathologies or the analysis of the immune response in the vertebrate host rely on substitute filaria. The most commonly used model is the rodent filaria Litomosoides sigmodontis which, like M. perstans, resides in the serous body cavities, including the pleural spaces [13–15]. The difficulties in breeding and handling of its natural host, the cotton rat Sigmodon hispidus gave rise to the search for other adequate laboratory hosts. To date, the gerbil Meriones unguiculatus, the murid rodent Mastomys natalensis, the albino rat, and the BALB/c mouse have been or are successfully used as experimental hosts of L. sigmodontis [16–21]. This filarial species develops a patent infection in these rodents. The infection is cleared in subcutaneous-inoculated mice about 100 days post-infection [22], whereas it can persist for more than a year in gerbils [16, 23]. Microfilariae appear in peripheral blood 8 weeks after infection in about half of infected BALB/c mice and around 9–12 weeks after infection in about 70–90% of infected gerbils [16, 18, 24–26].
Infective larvae migrate from the skin to the pleural cavity [15, 27] where they settle, grow and moult until they reach the adult stage. In the pleural cavity of BALB/c mice, the presence of the filariae induces a granulomatic cell reaction. The first granulomas are observed between day 8 and day 10 and are essentially composed of macrophages and eosinophils. Some contain exuviae of L3 [23]. Later, after the fourth moult, granulomas containing exuviae of young adults present 70% eosinophils but no neutrophils [23]. Finally from day 60 onwards granulomas composed of macrophages, eosinophils and neutrophils contain remains of adult filaria. In parallel to these granulomas, the inflammatory reaction recruits cells to the pleural cavity as early as the L3 arrive there [28, 29]. These infiltrates are mainly composed of macrophages, neutrophils and eosinophils [30] with a peak 30 days post-infection [31]. The proliferation and the alternative activation of these pleural macrophages is promoted by the interleukin (IL)-4 receptor and IL-33 (ST2) in L. sigmodontis infected BALB/c mice [32]. The alteration of IL-4/IL-5 signalling alters this cellular environment and leads to increased susceptibility to L. sigmodontis infection and influences adult worm burden and/or microfilaremia [24, 33, 34] as well as lung pathogenesis [24, 33]. Particularly, a central role of IL-13 and IL-4 in macrophage activation and eosinophil recruitment and in lung pathogenesis has been highlighted in a recent analysis of cytokine and chemokine transcripts in the lungs of 70 days-infected BALB/c mice [24]. Some lung pathology was also partially described in cotton rats, gerbils and white rats [19, 20, 35] showing a cellular and fibrotic reaction on the outside of the lung pleura. Most of these infected rodents were in various stages of mite-induced infection with L. sigmodontis but all animals developed patent infections. However there was no evidence that the findings in these rodents were dependent on the microfilariae. We recently showed that lung pathology in L. sigmodontis-infected BALB/c mice is dependent on microfilariae and Th2 immune responses [24]. Here we further describe the pulmonary pleural pathology in L. sigmodontis-infected gerbils Meriones unguiculatus and discuss the role of microfilariae in the development of lung inflammation. We also highlight the importance of parasite location within the host in the mating process.
Methods
Rodents and infestation protocol
The filaria Litomosoides sigmodontis Chandler, 1931 is maintained in the National Museum of Natural History (MNHN) facilities and infective third-stage larvae (L3) were recovered by dissection of the mite vector Ornithonyssus bacoti as previously described [18, 36].
Eight-week-old gerbils were purchased from Janvier (Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France) and maintained in the MNHN animal facilities on a 12-h light:dark photocycle. Gerbils were inoculated subcutaneously with a single dose of 40 L3 in 200 μl of RPMI1640 (Eurobio, Les Ulis, France) into the left lumbar area.
Filarial recovery
Gerbils were sacrificed at 70 days post-inoculation (p.i.). Filariae were collected from the pleural cavity, counted, sexed and the presence of microfilariae in female uteri was assessed using light microscopy (Olympus BX63 microscope, DP72 camera, Olympus Europa, Hamburg, Germany).
Lung imaging by scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Lungs from L. sigmodontis naive (n = 3), 50 days-infected (n = 3), 70 days-infected microfilaremic (Mfpos) gerbils (n = 2) and 70 days-infected amicrofilaremic (Mfneg) gerbils (n = 1) were removed from the chest, placed in a petri dish containing PBS and cut in 3–4 mm thick sections. Sections were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 30 min, dehydrated with increasing concentrations of ethanol (50% for 5 min, 70% for 5 min, 90% for 5 min, 100% for 3 × 5 min), and then with hexamethyldisilane (HMDS) for 2 × 5 min. Thereafter, the samples were immersed in HMDS and were left evaporating overnight under a fume hood. Dried lungs were fixed on metal supports using double-sided carbon tape and metallized by sputtering gold (Jeol FJC-1200 metallizer, JEOL, Peabody, USA). Observations of the visceral pleura were made with a Hitachi SU3500 SEM (MNHN Technical Electron Microscopy Platform, Paris, France; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
Lung histology and immunohistology
Lungs from naive and L. sigmodontis infected gerbils (n = 3–19 per group) were inflated with and fixed in 4% buffered formalin overnight. Fixative was changed 24 h post-fixation for a further 24 h. Thereafter, lungs were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of 70% to 100% ethanol baths, and then placed in toluene before paraffin embedding. Four-micron-thick serial sections were prepared. All sections were cut deep enough to see the main bronchi and perivascular adventitial cuff.
Various stainings were performed: (i) Picrosirius red (Bio Optica, Italy) to visualize collagen fibers according to the manufacturerʼs recommendations; (ii) Congo Red staining was performed using the following online protocol http://www.ihcworld.com/_protocols/special_stains/congo_red_highman.htm to visualize eosinophils; (iii) Toluidine blue staing was performed using the following online protocol http://www.ihcworld.com/_protocols/special_stains/toluidine_blue.htm to visualize mast cells; (iv) a cytokeratin immunostaining was used to visualize mesothelial cells: antigen retrieval was performed using a solution of Proteinase K (10 μg/ml) in Tris-EDTA buffer (10 min, 37 °C), then peroxidases and endogenous alkaline phosphatases were blocked by adding Dual Endogenous Enzyme Block for 10min (Dako, Santa Clara, USA). Non-specific sites were blocked with 5% rat-serum in PBS. Sections were incubated with the mouse anti-human cytokeratin monoclonal antibody (Ab) (1/50, clone AE1/AE3, Dako) for 45 min and then rinsed twice with PBS. Binding of the antibodies was detected by HRP linked universal secondary antibody (DAKO) and AEC substrate (DAKO) for 10 min. Sections were then counterstained with a Mayerʼs hematoxylin solution; (v) Immunostaining for leukocytes was performed at the Beatson Institute’s Histology Facility. Antigen retrieval was performed using Leica ER2 retrieval buffer (20 min, 95 °C). Sections were then stained at a previously optimised dilution, CD3: 1/100 (rabbit anti-mouse/human antibody, clone SP7; ab16669, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and CD45: 1/1000 (rabbit anti-mouse/human antibody, clone ab10558, Abcam) for 30 min at room temperature with the autostainer Bond Rx (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Antigen retrieval was performed on histological sections for CD68 (mouse anti-human antibody, clone PG-M1; M0876, Agilent, Santa Clara, USA) using Target Retrieval Solution, high pH (Agilent) (20 min at 97 °C) on a Dako PT retrieval module. CD68 sections were then stained on-board a Dako Autostainer Link48 platform at 1/500. All the IHC sections were visualised with 3,3’Diaminobenzidine.Stained sections were then digitally scanned using a Leica Aperio AT2 slide scanner at ×20 magnification.
Hearts and diaphragms fixed in 4% buffered formalin were also embedded into paraffin and 4-µm-thick sections were prepared. The tissues were deparaffinized with toluene and then hydrated using a series of decreasing concentrations of ethanol and a hematoxylin-eosin staining was performed. Visceral pleura, pericardium and diaphragmatic pleura were analyzed by light microscopy (Olympus BX63 microscope, DP72 camera) using the cell Sens Dimension 1.9 software.
Tissue processing and immunostaining for 3D imaging
Some paraffin-embedded tissues were used for 3D imaging after histological analysis. The protocol was adapted from [37]. The blocks were first deparaffinized by warming at 60 °C to melt the paraffin and immersing in 3 consecutive baths of xylene (1 h/8 h/1 h). Samples were then rehydrated in decreasing concentrations of 100% to 70% ethanol baths, and placed in PBS. Samples were stored in PBS/Bovine serum albumin (BSA)1%/Azide 0.05% at 4 °C.
For 2-photon imaging, the left lung was isolated and cut with a vibrating microtome (Campden5100mz) into 500-μm slices. The post-caval lobe was kept intact and used for light sheet microscopy imaging.
Samples were permeabilized for 24 h in PBS/Neutral goat serum (NGS) 10%/BSA1%/TritonX-100 (Tx100) 0.3%/Azide 0.05% at 37 °C and stained for 48 h with Cy3 anti-mouse/human αSMA antibody (clone 1A4, Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) in PBS/NGS10%/BSA1%/TX-100 0.1%/Azide 0.05% at 37 °C. Samples were then washed for 24 h in PBS/BSA1%/TX-100 0.1%/Azide 0.05% at 37 °C and 2 × 1 h in PBS before and after 4% paraformaldehyde post-fixation.
Samples were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of 50–100% methanol baths and cleared with Ethyl Cinnamate (Sigma Aldrich). 500-μm slices were transferred to a glass slide with slide chambers (Frame-Seal, Biorad, Hercules, USA), covered with Ethyl Cinnamate and a coverslip. Images were acquired with a Zeiss 880 2-photon microscope (Beatson Advanced Imaging Ressources, Beatson Institute, Glasgow, UK; Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equiped with a 32 channel Gallium arsenide phosphide (GaAsP) spectral detector (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using 20×/1 NA water immersion objective lens. Samples were excited with a tunable laser (680–1300 nm) set up at 950 nm and signal was collected onto a linear array of the 32 GaAsp detectors in lambda mode with a resolution of 8.9 nm over the visible spectrum. Spectral images were then unmixed with Zen software (Carl Zeiss) using references spectra acquired from unstained tissues (tissue autofluorescence and second harmonic generation) or beads labelled with Cy3 anti αSMA antibodies.
Intact lobes were immersed in Ethyl Cinnamate in an imaging chamber and imaged with a M Squared Aurora Light Sheet Microscope (IMPACT facility, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK) using 488 nm and 568 nm laser lines.
Analysis of lung pathology
Histology images were analysed using Sens Dimension 1.9 software. To analyse pleural inflammation, full lobe sections were imaged by mosaic imaging and pleural pathology (100 × length of pathologic pleura / total perimeter) was measured. Only the support area of the polyp on the mesothelium, or pedicle, was measured to evaluate this percentage.
To analyse immune composition of polyps, digital slides were analysed with QuPath [38]. All polyps/subpleural foci from the sections were manually annotated and DAB/Congo red/toluidine blue positive cells within the annotated areas were detected using the “positive cell detection” tool. The stain vectors used for detection were adjusted for each slide to correct any difference in staining/acquisition. Results were then expressed as number of positive cells/mm2 of polyp/subpleural foci.
2-photon and light sheet microscopy images were analysed using the IMARIS software v9 (Bitplane, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, UK). The different planes (z) were stacked to obtain a three-dimensional reconstruction of the different fluorescence signals. The different structures (blood vessels, polyps, bronchi, pleura) were segmented manualy using autofluorescence and alpha-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) signals. Blood vessels segmentation was started by drawing main veins/arteries which were then followed to segment the full vascular tree.
The volume of each segmented polyp and the surface of the pleura were exported and used to calculate the concentration of polyps of different size (No. of polyps/mm2 of pleura).
Statistical analyses
The choice of statistical tests was based on the sample size and on the Shapiro-Wilk test to determine whether the distribution of the samples conformed to a normal distribution. Data from separate experiments were pooled when possible (homoscedascity). The number of parasites was compared between the groups of gerbils (Mfneg versus Mfpos). Normally distributed data were analyzed using Student’s t-test.The proportion of pathological pleura was compared between the groups of gerbils (naive versus Mfneg versus Mfpos). Non-parametrically distributed data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-hoc test for a further comparison of the groups. The correlation between pleural pathology and the presence of filariae (adult male and/or female, or microfilariae) was analyzed using the Spearmanʼs rank correlation test then a linear regression was performed to describe relationship between variables (the pleural pathology is the dependent variable and the presence of filariae is the explanatory variable). Representation and data analyses were performed with R 3.6.1 and Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Inc.,San Diego, USA). Statistically significant P-values are given or indicated as *P < 0.05.
Results
Amicrofilaremic gerbils have fewer parasites in their pleural cavity
Gerbils were inoculated subcutaneously with 40 L3. After 70 days of infection, all gerbils had adult filariae in their pleural cavity (8.8 ± 1.4 filariae per cavity) and 66% of them were microfilaremic (Mfpos) (Fig. 1). Microfilaremia was highly variable depending on the gerbils. Microfilaremic load was correlated to the adult filarial load (r = 0.81, P < 0.0001). In contrast with what was observed in BALB/c mice [24], amicrofilaremic gerbils (Mfneg) had significantly fewer parasites in the pleural cavity (Mfneg: n = 2.7 ± 0.78; Mfpos: n = 11.1 ±1.13; t (24) = 4.32, P = 0.0002).
Fibrotic polyps are present on the thoracic pleurae of infected gerbils
The lungs of naive gerbils presented a smooth visceral mesothelium (Figs. 2a and 3a). Whilst the lungs of 50-days-infected gerbils and Mfneg gerbils displayed small and rare polyps on the visceral pleura (Fig. 2b, c), the visceral pleura of the lungs of Mfpos gerbils showed a strong inflammatory reaction with the formation of polypoid structures (Figs. 2d–f and 3b–g). In addition, hypertrophy of mesothelial cells and hyperplasia of the mesothelium, similar to that described in BALB/c infected mice [24], were both observed on the lungs covered with polyps (Fig. 3b). Lung pathology was quantified as the percentage of the visceral pleura covered with polyps compared to the perimeter of both the left and right lungs (Fig. 3d). About 14% of the visceral mesothelium of Mfpos lungs was covered with polyps, while only 1% of Mfneg pleura showed these structures. Different sizes of polyps were observed on the visceral pleura of gerbils, from small to large polyps regarding the height of each polyp (Fig. 3e–g). Most of the polyps were relatively small (more than 70% measured between 20–150 µm in height). Larger polyps measuring more than 250 µm were rare (less than 1%). Polyps grew out from an area below the visceral mesothelium and remained surrounded by the mesothelial cells thoughout their development (cytokeratin staining; Fig. 3f). Polyps and hyperplastic mesothelium both contain a fibrous structure rich in collagen (yellow/orange bright fibers in polarized light; Fig. 3g). Polyps were also observed on the diaphragmatic pleura of all Mfpos gerbils (Additional file 1: Figure S1 and Additional file 2: Fig.S2A,C-D) and occasionally on the pericardium of Mfpos gerbils (Additional file 2: Figure S2b, e, f). Diaphragm pathology was quantified in the same way as for the lungs and about 14% of the parietal pleura of the diaphragm was covered with polyps in Mfpos gerbils (Additional file 2: Figure S2g).
Large polyps are vascularized
Small polyps (< 150 µm) were never vascularized. Sections of blood vessels bordered by endothelial cells were only identified on polyps measuring more than 150 µm (Fig. 4a and Additional file 3: Fig. S3). They were all vascularized, as shown by anti-CD31 immunostaining and the presence of blood cells (Fig. 4b). To determine the origin of the vasculature in bigger polyps we took advantage of the development of tissue clearing methods to image large volumes of tissue in 3 dimensions [37, 39]. Briefly, lungs were recovered from paraffin blocks, stained for αSMA and cleared with Ethyl Cinnamate (see methods for more details). In the lung, αSMA is mainly expressed by smooth muscles surrounding bronchi, veins and arteries [40]. 2-photon imaging of thick tissue sections indicated that polyp vasculature also expressed αSMA (Fig. 4c). The segmentation of the vasculature showed that blood vessels in the polyps were connected to pulmonary blood circulation (Fig. 4 and Additional file 4: Movie S1) suggesting that a sprouting angiogenesis occurs in the polyps. The analysis of full lobes using a light sheet microscope confirmed the previous histological analysis (Additional file 5: Figure S4): no angiogenesis was observed in small polyps and only the larger ones presented vasculature (Fig. 4e–h and Additional file 6: Movie S2). These blood vessels originated from veins as well as arteries (Fig. 4h and Additional file 6: Movie S2). In addition, polyp vasculature was very dense, tortuous and disorganized (Fig. 4d, h, Additional file 4: Movie S1 and Additional file 6: Movie S2) which is somewhat similar to immature vasculature in some tumours [41, 42].
Polyps of Mfpos gerbils present massive cellular infiltrates
Inflammation of the pleura was then analysed by histology (Fig. 5). The staining of the pan-leukocyte marker CD45 indicated that if Mfneg animals showed a relatively mild pleural inflammation, the pleural area and the polyps of Mfpos gerbils were infiltrated by numerous immune cells (Fig. 5a–c). Smaller polyps (< 150 µm) were composed of about 40% of leukocytes while in larger ones immune infiltrates reached 60% of total cells. Dense subpleural inflammatory foci mostly composed of immune cells (80%) were also observed under most large polyps and some small ones (Fig. 5c, d, i). Infiltrates in polyps and subpleural foci were mainly composed of CD3+ lymphocytes, CD68+ macrophages and eosinophils (Fig. 5e–g, i). A few mast cells could also be observed in polyps but they were absent from subpleural foci (Fig. 5h, i).
Microfilaria and gravid females induces the formation of polyps on the visceral pleura
Microfilariae were not only observed in the area below the polyps (Fig. 2f) but also in lung polyps (Fig. 6a, c) and in the inflamed diaphragmatic pleura (Fig. 6b). The relationship was linear between the number of Mf in peripheral blood and the pleural pathology (Spearmanʼs test; n = 21, r = 0 .79, P < 0.0001). A linear regression was used to study the strength and the direction of the relationship, showing that 67% (R2 = 0.6752, P < 0.0001) of the pleural pathology can be significantly explained by the microfilarial load (Pleural pathology = 0.2431 × microfilarial load + 1.408) (Fig. 6d). The observed pathology was related to the presence of adults (both males and females, males, females, or gravid females only); the relationship was always linear and positive (n = 26, r = 0.83, P < 0.001; r = 0.83, P < 0.001; n = 26, r = 0.68, P < 0.001; n = 14, r = 0.67, P < 0.01, respectively). However, the observed pathology was mainly driven by the presence of gravid females in the pleural cavity (gravid females: R2 = 0.76, P < 0.0001; both males and females : R2 = 0.6; P < 0.0001; males : R2 = 0.59, P < 0.0001; all females : R2 = 0.43, P < 0.0001). Thus, the linear regression showed that 76% (R2= 0.7629, P < 0.0001) of the pleural pathology can be significantly explained by the number of gravid female (Pleural pathology = 2.050 × number of gravid females + 0.6341) (Fig. 6e).
Discussion
Here we show that infection of an immunocompetent and highly microfilaremic host with the filaria Litomosoides sigmodontis results in a strong pleural pulmonary manifestation with formation of vascularized eosinophilic polyps on the visceral pleura.
Litomosoides sigmodontis induces pleuro-pulmonary manifestations in a variety of rodents (cotton rats, rats, gerbils and BALB/c mice), which may differ in extent according to species, strain or individuals. However when we consider the pulmonary manifestations induced by L. sigmodontis, the available information mainly concerns the pleural space in which developing and adult filariae reside. Changes in lung tissue or in the pleura lining the thoracic cavity, the tissue with the closest contact with larvae and adult worms are less documented. The immune response in the thoracic cavity between the two pleurae has been extensively characterized at different stages of the filarial infection from the arrival of L3 larvae in the pleural space to the patent phase in susceptible (BALB/c) and resistant (C57BL/6) mouse models [15, 29, 31, 43–45]. Depending on the mouse strain, the mode of infection (natural through the vector or inoculation of a known number of L3) and the amount of the inoculum, the intensity of cell recruitment and the secretions of specific cytokines are different [25, 29, 46–48]. Regarding the mode of infection, subcutaneous (SC) injection of L3 may circumvent some of the skin immune responses and later pathological responses in the thoracic cavity. For example, the increased parasite load in IL-6 and NOD2-deficient mice, which show a delayed neutrophil recruitment at the site of infection, is overcome by subcutaneous infection [47, 49], resulting in a worm burden comparable to that of immunocompetent WT mice. However, mice deficient in S100A9 (which together with S100A8 forms a calprotectin that accounts for 40% of the cytosolic content of neutrophils) showed a similar decrease in parasite burden and an identical cell response in the pleural cavity, whether subcutaneously inoculated or naturally infected [50]. Also, at 8 days p.i., i.e. when the L3 settled in the pleural cavity, the recovery rate was similar in naturally or subcutaneously infected mice [15]. In gerbils, the presence of polyps on the visceral pleura was described in both animals naturally infected [35] or inoculated with L. sigmodontis. However, as it is not possible to control the inoculum, natural infections can lead to very variable parasite burden. The previous reports of pulmonary pathology after natural infection presented much higher worm burdens than those obtained after SC injection of 40 L3 larvae (depending on studies, an average of 20–250 adult parasites was isolated from the thoracic cavity vs 8–10 after SC infection) [19, 21, 24, 33, 35]. These massive parasite loads could explain an earlier onset of the pathology in some studies and hide the microfilaria-specific effect observed here. This suggests that if circumventing natural immune responses in the skin does not necessarily alter the pleuropulmonary phenotype, worm burden could have an impact. Indeed, until now, the pleuropulmonary manifestations have been considered to be caused mainly by adult worm products [16, 21, 35]; they were not seen to be associated with the presence of microfilariae. To support this proposition, some lung pathologies were observed even before the patent phase, when adult worms are present but the microfilariae are not yet released [20, 21]. In our experimental system, small and rare polyps were observed on the pleura of 50-days-infected gerbils, i.e. before the production of microfilariae but only microfilaremic gerbils have numerous and large polyps on the visceral pleura. Thus it is likely that developing filariae present in the pleura cavity are responsible for the initiation of the pleuropulmonary pathology but the release of microfilariae can further increase the phenomenon. Indeed, microfilariae are present in small polypoid structures and the number of microfilariae present in the peripheral blood is correlated with the extent of the pathology. Moreover, the formation of polyps could be enhanced by inflammation of the mesothelium in contact with the microfilariae as pleural mesothelium reacts rapidly to infection by producing cytokines which recruit cells [51]. Regarding the mouse strain, a strong proliferation of resident macrophages is observed in the pleural cavity of C57BL/6 mice whereas the increase in macrophage population is mainly due to an influx of circulating monocytes in BALB/c mice [45]. The mesothelial cells contiguous to the visceral pleura have been shown to produce inflammatory chemokines such as CCL2 or CXCL12 in both strains of mice [29, 52]. Pathological alterations in the lung caused by L3 larvae migration were noted with hemorrhages and granulomas observed in the pulmonary parenchyma of BALB/c mice [15]. Later the presence of adult filariae in the pleural space leads to pleural hypertrophy, and in the presence of microfilariae, pleural hyperplasia with dense mesh of collagen fibers (a signature of fibrosis) was also described [24]. Pathological changes of the visceral mesothelium was also described in highly microfilaremic and immunocompetent hosts of L. sigmodontis. The proliferative reaction of the visceral mesothelium lead to the formation of polyps that protrude from the surface of the pleura. Polyps are also present in other areas of the thoracic cavity such as the pericardium and diaphragmatic pleura. Such pathologies were noticed in the gerbil M. unguiculatus [19] or in albino rats [53] and to a much lesser extent in the cotton rats [35] or in Mastomys natalensis [54] but never in the mouse [24].
Similar to BALB.Xid mice that are deficient in B1 lymphocytes, gerbils present an deficiency of antibody response to T-independent antigen [55]. BALB.Xid mice show higher susceptibility to L. sigmodontis infection resulting in higher microfilarial burdens which was accompanied by a lower Th2 response and the inability of BALB.Xid B cells to produce IL-10 [56]. An alteration in the Th2 response could explain the strong permissiveness of the gerbil to infection with L. sigmodontis. However, the immune response is still Th2-oriented because a strong eosinophilic response in the polyps is observed. Other cells can then stimulate the Th2 response, such as innate lymphoid type 2 cells, which have been shown to play a role in triggering the Th2 response to helminth infection (including filariasis) by secreting specific cytokines [57, 58]. This response plays an important role in the observed pathology because in the absence of eosinophils, the pleura of mice does not show any signs of hyperplasia and therefore protects against fibrosis [24]. Although eosinophils are known to be a central feature of the host response for the elimination of adult worms and microfilariae [59–61], they also accelerate the development of the parasite in the early stages of infection [44] and participate in the damages in the event of hyperresponsiveness [62–64]. In lymphatic filariasis, eosinophils have a dual role regarding their involvement in the pathogenesis associated with the tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. On one hand they participate in the destruction of the microfilariae trapped in the pulmonary microcirculation but on the other hand they are responsible for some of the damage to the lungs. This happens through the release of the components of the eosinophilic granule, such as major basic protein, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and eosinophil cationic protein or mediators, such as transforming growth factor, which act directly on target fibroblasts to promote fibrosis [3, 62, 64]. The host must then regulate its eosinophilic balance to resolve the infection and avoid tissue damage such as polyps on the pleura. Mast cells are also involved in the immune response to infection by helminths including filaria [47, 65–67] but appears to have a limited role during the infection with L. sigmodontis [68]. As only a very few mast cells were observed in polyps, it seems unlikely that they play an important role in the observed pathology.
The etiology of the polyps is currently unknown. They are likely the result of a proliferative reaction of the visceral mesothelium. Initially they appeared as a slight uplift of the mesothelium, then as they develop they are invaded by inflammatory cells such as eosinophils, macrophages, lymphocytes and a few mast cells. Larger polyps formed in less than 20 days. The growth of polyps was associated with the rapid development of imperfect vascularization. This is reminiscent of the tortuous and leaky vessels observed in some tumors [41]. However, it remains to be elucidated whether the vascularization here is associated with the explosive inflammatory response of the host, the hypoxic environment in the polyps and/or the parasite itself, through the release of angiogenic factors [69–71]. Little information on direct pro-angiogenic functions of filarial antigens is available. For example Ov-ASP proteins from Onchocerca volvulus may directly induce an angiogenic response [72, 73] and may therefore contribute to corneal neovascularization in onchocercal keratitis. After the formation of subcutaneous nodules around adult O. volvulus worms, angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis occurs inside associated with angio-lymphangiogenic factors such as CXCL12 and VEGF-C [74]. Asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase (BmAsnRS) of Brugia malayi induced in vitro proliferation and tube formation by endothelial cells but also vasodilatation and lengthening of vessels ex vivo [75]. In addition, Dirofilaria immitis has an indirect effect on angiogenesis by stimulating the secretion of the pro-angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) by the endothelial cells [76]. The presence of the filariae/microfilariae may stimulate the formation of new vessels which are usually beneficial defense processes generated in response to parasitic infection. Indeed the formation of new vessels results in a local influx of plasma and inflammatory cells to encounter the parasite [77, 78]. These inflammatory cells in turn can help amplify the angiogenic signal. The role of eosinophils in tissue remodeling and angiogenesis in allergic disease is also well documented [79–82]. They can release several proangiogenic mediators such as VEGF or eosinophil peroxidase [79, 83, 84] and can therefore contribute in the neovascularization process. Macrophages exhibit a variety of cellular functions including the secretion of growth factors, enzymes and chemokines, which are potentially important for the vascular growth and remodeling during angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis [85]. Thus, all these cells can act in synergy to promote the formation of new vascularization.
Conclusions
This study shows that although the pathology is initiated by the presence of young adult filariae in the pleural cavity of gerbils, the presence of gravid females and then microfilariae exacerbates the inflammation of the pleural mesothelium. Whatever the rodent host, the pathological changes in the visceral pleura seem to follow the same etiology: the mesothelial cells become hypertrophic before the release of microfilariae. However, each rodent species has its own specificities. For example, unlike cotton rats, white rats and gerbils, no polyp has ever been observed in mice regardless of their permissiveness to infection and immune status. When the infection becomes patent with the appearance of microfilariae in the pleural cavity and then in the bloodstream, the damage already initiated by the presence of adult worms was exacerbated in high microfilaremic hosts. For example, only microfilaremic mice have a hyperplasic and fibrous visceral pleura. In amicrofilaremic gerbils, the polyps are punctual and remain small whereas they can become very large and vascularized in microfilaremic gerbils.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We deeply thank Geraldine Toutirais (PTME, Plateau Technique de Microscopie Électronique et de Microanalyses du Museum National dʼHistoire Naturelle, Paris) for assistance with SEM imaging. We also thank Professor Matthew Nolan (Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, The university of Edinburgh) for the access to the Light Sheet Microscope and Neveen Hosny, Pedro Almada and Tom Mitchell from Msquared life for assistance with light sheet microscopy imaging. We thank Dr Catherine Winchester (CRUK Beatson institute) for proofreading the manuscript.
Abbreviations
- αSMA
Alpha-smooth muscle actin
- BSA
Bovine serum albumin
- HMDS
Hexamethyldisilane
- IL
Interleukin
- L3
Infective third-stage larvae
- Mfneg
Amicrofilaremic
- Mfpos
Microfilaremic
- NGS
Neutral goat serum
- PBS
Phosphate-buffered saline
- p.i.
Post-inoculation
- SEM
Scanning electron microscopy
Authorsʼ contributions
Conceptualization: FF, LC and CM. Formal analysis: FF, ER, JQ, LC and CM. Funding acquisition: LC and CM. Investigation: FF, ER, NV, JA, LR, CN, LC and CM. Resources: LC and CM. Visualization: FF and ER. Writing (original draft): FF, ER and CM; Writing (review and editing): FF, ER, JQ, LC and CM.
Funding
CM is grateful for core funding from the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle and the European Community grant H2020-EU.3.1.3.-HELP-815628. ER is recipients of a PhD fellowship from the “Ecole doctorale 227 (MNHN/UPMC)”. LMC and FF are grateful for the core funding from Cancer Research UK (CRUK A17196 and A23983). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
All data supporting the findings of this article are included in the article and its additional files.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the EU Directive 2010/63/UE and the relevant national legislation, namely the French “Decret No. 2013±118, 1er fevrier 2013, Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Agroalimentaire et de la Foret”. Protocols were approved by the ethical committee of the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Comité Cuvier, Licence: 68-002) and by the “Direction départementale de la cohésion sociale et de la Protection des populations” (DDCSPP) (No. C75-05-15).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Frédéric Fercoq and Estelle Remion contributed equally to this work
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s13071-020-04428-0.
References
- 1.Bouchery T, Lefoulon E, Karadjian G, Nieguitsila A, Martin C. The symbiotic role of Wolbachia in Onchocercidae and its impact on filariasis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:131–140. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anderson RC. Nematode parasites of vertebrates: their development and transmission. Wallingford: Cabi; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mullerpattan JB, Udwadia ZF, Udwadia FE. Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia - a review. Indian J Med Sci. 2013;138:295. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ottesen EA, Nutman TB. Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Annu Rev Med. 1992;43:417–424. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.43.020192.002221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Webb JK, Job CK, Gault EW. Tropical eosinophilia. Lancet. 1960;1:835–842. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(60)90730-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kabego L, Kasengi JB, Mirindi P, Ruhanya V, Lupande D, Bulabula A, et al. Pulmonary localization of Mansonella perstans in a 16 months-old male patient in a tertiary care hospital in Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Germs. 2016;6:151–154. doi: 10.11599/germs.2016.1101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kahn JB. Pleural effusion associated with Dipetalonema perstans (Acanthocheilonema perstans) J Infect Dis. 1983;147:166. doi: 10.1093/infdis/147.1.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Simonsen PE, Onapa AW, Asio SM. Mansonella perstans filariasis in Africa. Acta Trop. 2011;120:109–120. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ta-Tang TH, Crainey J, Post RJ, Luz SLB, Rubio J. Mansonellosis: current perspectives. Res Rep Trop Med. 2018;9:9–24. doi: 10.2147/RRTM.S125750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kramer L, Grandi G, Leoni M, Passeri B, McCall J, Genchi C, et al. Wolbachia and its influence on the pathology and immunology of Dirofilaria immitis infection. Vet Parasitol. 2008;158:191–195. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lok JB. Dirofilaria sp.: taxonomy and distribution. In: Boreham PFL, Atwell RB, editors. Dirofilariasis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018. pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Simon F, Siles-Lucas M, Morchon R, Gonzalez-Miguel J, Mellado I, Carreton E, et al. Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic. Clin Micro Rev. 2012;25:507–544. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00012-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bain O, Wanji S, Vuong PN, Maréchal P, Le Goff L, Petit G, et al. Larval biology of six filariae of the sub-family Onchocercinae in a vertebrate host. Parasite. 1994;1:241–254. doi: 10.1051/parasite/1994013241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fulton A, Babayan SA, Taylor MD. Use of the Litomosoides sigmodontis infection model of filariasis to study Type 2 immunity. In: Reinhardt RL, editor. Type 2 immunity. New York: Humana; 2018. pp. 11–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Karadjian G, Fercoq F, Pionnier N, Vallarino-Lhermitte N, Lefoulon E, Nieguitsila A, et al. Migratory phase of Litomosoides sigmodontis filarial infective larvae is associated with pathology and transient increase of S100A9 expressing neutrophils in the lung. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0005596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jacquet C. Litomosoides carinii (Travassos, 1919) Chandler, 1913 (Filarioidea) in cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus, Say et Ord, 1825) and Jirds (Meriones unguiculatus, Milne-Edwards, 1867) Neuchâtel: Doctoral dissertation, University of Neuchâtel; 1980. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Maréchal P, Le Goff L, Petit G, Diagne M, Taylor DW, Bain O, et al. The fate of the filaria Litomosoides sigmodontis in susceptible and naturally resistant mice. Parasite. 1996;3:25–31. doi: 10.1051/parasite/1996031025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Petit G, Diagne M, Maréchal P, Owen D, Taylor D, Bain O. Maturation of the filaria Litomosoides sigmodontis in BALB/c mice; comparative susceptibility of nine other inbred strains. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1992;67:144–150. doi: 10.1051/parasite/1992675144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schneider CR, Blair LS, Schardein JL, Boche LK, Thompson PE. Comparison of early Litomosoides carinii infections in cotton rats and gerbils. J Parasitol. 1968;54:1099–1105. doi: 10.2307/3276972. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mohan RN. Pathological changes in white rats infected with Litomosoides carinii. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1973;67:883–884. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(73)90021-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zahner H, Rudolph R, Nolte I. Histopathological and electron microscopical studies in Litomosoides carinii infected Mastomys natalensis. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 1987;34:51–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1987.tb00370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fercoq F. Interactions filaire/poumon dans le modèle murin de filariose. Paris: Doctoral dissertation, Museum national d’histoire naturelle; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Attout T, Martin C, Babayan SA, Kozek WJ, Bazzocchi C, Oudet F, et al. Pleural cellular reaction to the filarial infection Litomosoides sigmodontis is determined by the moulting process, the worm alteration, and the host strain. Parasitol Int. 2008;57:201–211. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2008.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fercoq F, Remion E, Frohberger SJ, Vallarino-Lhermitte N, Hoerauf A, Le Quesne J, et al. IL-4 receptor dependent expansion of lung CD169+ macrophages in microfilaria-driven inflammation. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Le Goff L, Lamb TJ, Graham AL, Harcus Y, Allen JE. IL-4 is required to prevent filarial nematode development in resistant but not susceptible strains of mice. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32:1277–1284. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00125-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Morris CP, Evans H, Larsen SE, Mitre E. A Comprehensive, model-based review of vaccine and repeat infection trials for filariasis. Clin Micro Rev. 2013;26:381–421. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kilarski WW, Martin C, Pisano M, Bain O, Babayan SA, Swartz MA. Inherent biomechanical traits enable infective filariae to disseminate through collecting lymphatic vessels. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2895. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10675-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Babayan S, Attout T, Specht S, Hoerauf A, Snounou G, Rénia L, et al. Increased early local immune responses and altered worm development in high-dose infections of mice susceptible to the filaria Litomosoides sigmodontis. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2005;194:151–162. doi: 10.1007/s00430-004-0226-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Babayan S, Ungeheuer M-N, Martin C, Attout T, Belnoue E, Snounou G, et al. Resistance and susceptibility to filarial infection with Litomosoides sigmodontis are associated with early differences in parasite development and in localized immune reactions. Infect Immun. 2003;71:6820–6829. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.12.6820-6829.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Loke P, MacDonald AS, Robb A, Maizels RM, Allen JE. Alternatively activated macrophages induced by nematode infection inhibit proliferation via cell-to-cell contact. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30:2669–2678. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(200009)30:9<2669::AID-IMMU2669>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bouchery T, Ehrhardt K, Lefoulon E, Hoffmann W, Bain O, Martin C. Differential tissular distribution of Litomosoides sigmodontis microfilariae between microfilaremic and amicrofilaremic mice following experimental infection. Parasite. 2012;19:351–358. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2012194351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jackson-Jones LH, Rückerl D, Svedberg F, Duncan S, Maizels RM, Sutherland TE, et al. IL-33 delivery induces serous cavity macrophage proliferation independent of interleukin-4 receptor alpha. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46:2311–2321. doi: 10.1002/eji.201646442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ritter M, Tamadaho RS, Feid J, Vogel W, Wiszniewsky K, Perner S, et al. IL-4/5 signalling plays an important role during Litomosoides sigmodontis infection, influencing both immune system regulation and tissue pathology in the thoracic cavity. Int J Parasitol. 2017;47:951–960. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2017.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Frohberger SJ, Ajendra J, Surendar J, Stamminger W, Ehrens A, Buerfent BC, et al. Susceptibility to L. sigmodontis infection is highest in animals lacking IL-4R/IL-5 compared to single knockouts of IL-4R, IL-5 or eosinophils. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:248. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3502-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wharton DR. Pathological changes in natural and experimental filariasis in the cotton rat. J Infect Dis. 1947;80:307–318. doi: 10.1093/infdis/80.3.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Diagne M, Petit G, Liot P, Cabaret J, Bain O. The filaria Litomosoides galizai in mites; microfilarial distribution in the host and regulation of the transmission. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1990;65:193–199. doi: 10.1051/parasite/1990654193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tanaka N, Kanatani S, Tomer R, Sahlgren C, Kronqvist P, Kaczynska D, et al. Whole-tissue biopsy phenotyping of three-dimensional tumours reveals patterns of cancer heterogeneity. Nat Biomed Eng. 2017;1:796–806. doi: 10.1038/s41551-017-0139-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernández JA, Dombrowski Y, McArt DG, Dunne PD, et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ueda HR, Ertürk A, Chung K, Gradinaru V, Chédotal A, Tomancak P, et al. Tissue clearing and its applications in neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020;21:61–79. doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0250-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Moiseenko A, Kheirollahi V, Chao C-M, Ahmadvand N, Quantius J, Wilhelm J, et al. Origin and characterization of alpha smooth muscle actin-positive cells during murine lung development: ACTA2 + Cells in murine lung development. Stem Cells. 2017;35:1566–1578. doi: 10.1002/stem.2615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mattheolabakis G, Mikelis CM. Nanoparticle delivery and tumor vascular normalization: the chicken or the egg? Front Oncol. 2019;9:1227. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Viallard C, Larrivée B. Tumor angiogenesis and vascular normalization: alternative therapeutic targets. Angiogenesis. 2017;20:409–426. doi: 10.1007/s10456-017-9562-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Makepeace BL, Martin C, Turner JD, Specht S. Granulocytes in helminth infection - who is calling the shots? Curr Med Chem. 2012;19:1567–1586. doi: 10.2174/092986712799828337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Babayan SA, Read AF, Lawrence RA, Bain O, Allen JE. Filarial parasites develop faster and reproduce earlier in response to host immune effectors that determine filarial life expectancy. PLOS Biology. 2010;8:e1000525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Campbell SM, Knipper JA, Ruckerl D, Finlay CM, Logan N, Minutti CM, et al. Myeloid cell recruitment versus local proliferation differentiates susceptibility from resistance to filarial infection. eLife. 2018;7:e30947. doi: 10.7554/eLife.30947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Finlay CM, Allen JE. The immune response of inbred laboratory mice to Litomosoides sigmodontis: a route to discovery in myeloid cell biology. Parasite Immunol. 2020;42:e12708. doi: 10.1111/pim.12708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Muhsin M, Ajendra J, Gentil K, Berbudi A, Neumann A-L, Klaas L, et al. IL-6 is required for protective immune responses against early filarial infection. Int J Parasitol. 2018;48:925–935. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Specht S, Taylor MD, Hoeve MA, Allen JE, Lang R, Hoerauf A. Over expression of IL-10 by macrophages overcomes resistance to murine filariasis. Exp Parasitol. 2012;132:90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ajendra J, Specht S, Ziewer S, Schiefer A, Pfarr K, Parčina M, et al. NOD2 dependent neutrophil recruitment is required for early protective immune responses against infectious Litomosoides sigmodontis L3 larvae. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39648. doi: 10.1038/srep39648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Frohberger SJ, Fercoq F, Neumann AL, Surendar J, Stamminger W, Ehrens A, et al. S100A8/S100A9 deficiency increases neutrophil activation and protective immune responses against invading infective L3 larvae of the filarial nematode Litomosoides sigmodontis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Batra H, Antony VB. Pleural mesothelial cells in pleural and lung diseases. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:17. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.02.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bouchery T, Dénécé G, Attout T, Ehrhardt K, Lhermitte-Vallarino N, Hachet-Haas M, et al. The chemokine CXCL12 is essential for the clearance of the filaria Litomosoides sigmodontis in resistant mice. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e34971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bagai RC, Subrahmanyam D. Studies on the host-parasite relation in albino rats infected with Litomosoides carinii. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1968;17:833–839. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1968.17.833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pringle G. Notes on the host-parasite relationship during infection of Praomys (Mastomys) natalensis with the filarial parasite Litomosoides carinii. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1974;68:205–224. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1974.11686938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mohanty MC, Ravindran B. Deficiency of antibody responses to T-independent antigens in gerbils Meriones unguiculatus. Dev Comp Immunol. 2002;26:385–391. doi: 10.1016/S0145-305X(01)00086-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Al-Qaoud KM, Fleischer B, Hoerauf A. The Xid defect imparts susceptibility to experimental murine filariosis - association with a lack of antibody and IL-10 production by B cells in response to phosphorylcholine. Int Immunol. 1998;10:17–25. doi: 10.1093/intimm/10.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Boyd A, Killoran K, Mitre E, Nutman TB. Pleural cavity type 2 innate lymphoid cells precede Th2 expansion in murine Litomosoides sigmodontis infection. Exp Parasitol. 2015;159:118–126. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2015.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Herbert DR, Douglas B, Zullo K. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2): Type 2 immunity and helminth immunity. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:2276. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cadman ET, Thysse KA, Bearder S, Cheung AYN, Johnston AC, Lee JJ, et al. Eosinophils are important for protection, immunoregulation and pathology during infection with nematode microfilariae. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003988. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Saeftel M, Arndt M, Specht S, Volkmann L, Hoerauf A. Synergism of gamma interferon and interleukin-5 in the control of murine filariasis. Infect Immun. 2003;71:6978–6985. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.12.6978-6985.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Volkmann L, Bain O, Saeftel M, Specht S, Fischer K, Brombacher F, et al. Murine filariasis: interleukin 4 and interleukin 5 lead to containment of different worm developmental stages. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2003;192:23–31. doi: 10.1007/s00430-002-0155-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.O’Bryan L, Pinkston P, Kumaraswami V, Vijayan V, Yenokida G, Rosenberg HF, et al. Localized eosinophil degranulation mediates disease in tropical pulmonary eosinophilia. Infect Immun. 2003;71:1337–1342. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.3.1337-1342.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sharma P, Sharma A, Vishwakarma AL, Agnihotri PK, Sharma S, Srivastava M. Host lung immunity is severely compromised during tropical pulmonary eosinophilia: role of lung eosinophils and macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;99:619–628. doi: 10.1189/jlb.4A0715-309RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Vijayan VK. Tropical pulmonary eosinophilia: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2007;13:428–433. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e3281eb8ec9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hepworth MR, Danilowicz-Luebert E, Rausch S, Metz M, Klotz C, Maurer M, et al. Mast cells orchestrate type 2 immunity to helminths through regulation of tissue-derived cytokines. PNAS. 2012;109:6644–6649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112268109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ryan NM, Oghumu S. Role of mast cells in the generation of a T-helper type 2 dominated anti-helminthic immune response. Biosci Rep. 2019;39:BSR20181771. doi: 10.1042/BSR20181771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sasaki Y, Yoshimoto T, Maruyama H, Tegoshi T, Ohta N, Arizono N, et al. IL-18 with IL-2 protects against Strongyloides venezuelensis infection by activating mucosal mast cell-dependent type 2 innate immunity. J Exp Med. 2005;202:607–616. doi: 10.1084/jem.20042202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Linnemann LC, Reitz M, Feyerabend TB, Breloer M, Hartmann W. Limited role of mast cells during infection with the parasitic nematode Litomosoides sigmodontis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14:e0008534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Krock BL, Skuli N, Simon MC. Hypoxia-induced angiogenesis: good and evil. Genes Cancer. 2011;2:1117–1133. doi: 10.1177/1947601911423654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Szade A, Grochot-Przeczek A, Florczyk U, Jozkowicz A, Dulak J. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of inflammation-induced angiogenesis. IUBMB life. 2015;67:145–159. doi: 10.1002/iub.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Dennis RO, Schubert U, Bauer C. Angiogenesis and parasitic helminth-associated neovascularization. Parasitology. 2011;138:426. doi: 10.1017/S0031182010001642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Higazi TB, Pearlman E, Whikehart DR, Unnasch TR. Angiogenic activity of an Onchocerca volvulus Ancylostoma secreted protein homologue. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2003;129:61–68. doi: 10.1016/S0166-6851(03)00094-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Tawe W, Pearlman E, Unnasch TR, Lustigman S. Angiogenic activity of Onchocerca volvulus recombinant proteins similar to vespid venom antigen 5. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000;9:91–99. doi: 10.1016/S0166-6851(00)00231-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Attout T, Hoerauf A, Dénécé G, Debrah AY, Marfo-Debrekyei Y, Boussinesq M, et al. Lymphatic vascularisation and involvement of Lyve-1+ macrophages in the human Onchocerca nodule. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Dhanraj M, Solaiappan S, Sivanesan S, Kron M, Dhanasekaran A. Brugia malayi asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase stimulates endothelial cell proliferation, vasodilation and angiogenesis. PloS ONE. 2016;11:e0146132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zueva T, Morchón R, Carretón E, Montoya-Alonso JA, Santana A, Bargues MD, et al. Angiogenic response in an in vitro model of dog microvascular endothelial cells stimulated with antigenic extracts from Dirofilaria immitis adult worms. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:315. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3570-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Danese S, Dejana E, Fiocchi C. Immune regulation by microvascular endothelial cells: directing innate and adaptive immunity, coagulation, and inflammation. J Immunol. 2007;178:6017–6022. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Frantz S, Vincent KA, Feron O, Kelly RA. Innate immunity and angiogenesis. Circ Res. 2005;96:15–26. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000153188.68898.ac. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Aceves S, Broide D. Airway fibrosis and angiogenesis due to eosinophil trafficking in chronic asthma. CMM. 2008;8:350–358. doi: 10.2174/156652408785161023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Humbles AA. A Critical role for eosinophils in allergic airways remodeling. Science. 2004;305:1776–1779. doi: 10.1126/science.1100283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Nissim Ben Efraim AH, Levi-Schaffer F. Roles of eosinophils in the modulation of angiogenesis. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2014;99:138–154. doi: 10.1159/000353251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Puxeddu I, Ribatti D, Crivellato E, Levi-Schaffer F. Mast cells and eosinophils: a novel link between inflammation and angiogenesis in allergic diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116:531–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Panagopoulos V, Zinonos I, Leach DA, Hay SJ, Liapis V, Zysk A, et al. Uncovering a new role for peroxidase enzymes as drivers of angiogenesis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;68:128–138. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Puxeddu I, Alian A, Piliponsky AM, Ribatti D, Panet A, Levi-Schaffer F. Human peripheral blood eosinophils induce angiogenesis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;37:628–636. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2004.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Corliss BA, Azimi MS, Munson JM, Peirce SM, Murfee WL. Macrophages: an inflammatory link between angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Microcirculation. 2016;23:95–121. doi: 10.1111/micc.12259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data supporting the findings of this article are included in the article and its additional files.