Residents' Perceived Impact of COVID-19 on Saudi Ophthalmology Training Programs-A Survey

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of the current pandemic on ophthalmology residency training in Saudi Arabia, focusing on its effects on clinical education, training, and the mental well-being of the trainees.

Methods

An online self-administered questionnaire was distributed among residents in the Saudi ophthalmology training programs between July 7 and 14, 2020. In this study, we explored residents’ opinions regarding training disruption and virtual education. The patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to assess the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on their mental health. We used descriptive statistics for data analysis.

Results

Out of 183 registered ophthalmology residents, 142 participated in this study. Ninety-six participants (35.4%) were rotated at a specialized eye hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic, while 52 (19.2%) had rotations in the ophthalmology department at general hospitals. Those who rotated in both types of hospitals were 123 (45.4%). According to the participants, there was a significant decline in exposure to surgical and office-based procedures compared to emergency eye consultations (Friedman P <0.001). The COVID-19 pandemic’s effect on mental health was reported by 100 (70.5%) participants. Eighty-five (55.4%) respondents were satisfied with the virtual method of education.

Conclusion

COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted residents’ clinical and surgical training in the Saudi ophthalmology training programs. Additionally, we believe that COVID-19 may have a negative impact on trainees’ mental health. Fortunately, the current pandemic provided an innovative education method that will likely be used even after the pandemic.

Introduction

In December 2019, an outbreak of pneumonia emerged from Wuhan, a city in China, caused by a new coronavirus.¹ A few months later, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared it a pandemic.² This pandemic has affected many sectors, including world economics, lifestyle, and the healthcare system.

On March 02nd, 2020, the first confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) case in Saudi Arabia was reported in the eastern region.³

As recommended by national and international ophthalmic societies, routine ophthalmic services ceased to operate and, only urgent and emergency services kept running.^4,5 Unfortunately, this negatively impacted residents’ surgical and clinical training. In response to the letter sent by the American Academy of Ophthalmology to its members about reopening of routine services, some centers have opted to reopen clinics and perform surgeries while implementing precautionary measures to limit the risk of exposure and transmission of the disease.^6,7 In addition to disruption in clinical and surgical teaching, didactic teaching programs such as grand rounds and lectures were administered through virtual platforms such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Cisco WebEx. We believed that ophthalmology residents had experienced remarkable limitations in their clinical training and surgical exposure due to these dramatic changes. Given the uncertainty of this pandemic’s duration and impact on the residents’ mental health, assessing residents’ perception and well-being is crucial.

In Saudi Arabia, the impact of COVID 19 on ophthalmology training was not studied yet. This study aimed to assess the pandemic impact on ophthalmology residency training by obtaining the residents’ perspective as we believe that their perception is crucial and valuable to adapt to changes while maintaining a successful residency training.^8,9 We believe that identifying the pandemic’s true impact on training from the residents’ point of view will provide beneficial insight for program directors and decision-makers to implement solutions for disrupted clinical training and insufficient surgical exposure. Moreover, exploring the efficiency of virtual teaching is important because of its novelty and the probability of permanently replacing the conventional teaching way. Finally, mental health well-being is an essential part of the residents’ overall health, and assessing it at the time of crisis is crucial since mental illness can have long-lasting negative effects on them, and recognizing them earlier allows for rapid interventions, subsequently a better outcome.¹⁰

Methods

The institutional review board at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital (KKESH) approved the current study (number: 20100-P). All study conducts adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. A questionnaire was sent to all residents (n-183) currently enrolled in SCFHS accredited ophthalmology training programs, between 7 and 14 July 2020. Participation was voluntary and complete anonymity was ensured. All participants provided informed consent to take part in this study. The survey (Appendix 1) consisted of 50 questions. The questions covered mainly demographics data such as program location, type of hospital general or specialized, level of training, gender, marital status, and whether he/she lives alone or with family or friends. We included questions about the pandemic’s impact on the training changes in clinical working hours, surgical exposure, on-call, emergency room coverage, and overall training. Regarding the hospital policies/general health guidelines changes, we asked the participants whether the hospital kept operated or services forced to shut down, whether the participant was exposed to COVID-19 cases or deployed to cover other services, personal protective equipment (PPE) availability, and types. Specific questions were directed to a subset of residents who were diagnosed with COVID-19.

Additionally, the questionnaire included questions related to theoretical teaching and the quality of the virtual teaching. The effect of the pandemic on studying, research, and elective rotations was also explored. Finally, we used the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) to assess the impact of COVID-19 on mental health.^11,12 In a study conducted by Kroenke et al, PHQ-9 was found to have a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 88% for diagnosing major depression. Thereby, they concluded that PHQ-9 is a valid and reliable tool to assess depressive symptoms.¹¹

Statistical Analysis

The data was transferred from the SurveyMonkey platform into a Microsoft XL spreadsheet. The Data analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Studies (SPSS 25) (IBM, NY, USA). The qualitative variables like gender, training level were presented as numbers and percentages. The quantitative variables like impact on training scores were studied for distribution. If the variables were not normally distributed, the median and interquartile range were estimated. To compare the impact score in subgroups, we used a nonparametric method, and for two independent variables, the Wilcoxon P-value was estimated. For more than two independent variables, Friedman P-value was presented. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 183-total number of ophthalmology residents in Saudi Arabia, 142 (77.6%) answered the submitted questionnaire. The comparison between ophthalmic residents and surveyed participants is given in Table 1. Those who participated were not significantly different from those who did not. Among surveyed residents, eighty-six (60.6%) were males, 88 (62%) were unmarried, 104 (73.9%) were living with their family. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 96 participants (35.4%) were rotated at a specialized eye hospital, while 52 (19.2%) had rotations in the ophthalmology department at general hospitals. Those who rotated in both types of hospitals were 123 (45.4%).

Table 1.

Comparison of the Profile of All Ophthalmology Residents and Surveyed Participants

		All Ophthalmology Residents		Survey Participants		Validation
		Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage
Total		183	100	142	77.6
Gender	Male	106	57.9	86	60.6	P = 0.17
	Female	77	42.1	56	39.4
Level	R1	51	27.9	45	31.7	P = 0.88
	R2	46	25.1	27	19.0
	R3	43	23.5	38	26.8
	R4	43	23.5	32	22.5
Region	Central	85	46.4	68	47.9	χ2 = 0.21 Df =3 P = 0.64
	Eastern	36	19.7	35	24.6
	Western	42	23.0	21	14.8
	Southern	20	10.9	18	12.7

Abbreviation: DF, degree of freedom.

Changes in the participants’ clinical and surgical activities during the COVID-19 pandemic are shown in Table 2. Only 129 participants responded to these questions. According to the participants, the overall score suggested a significant reduction of 45.7% compared to the pre-pandemic. Compared to emergency eye consultations, there was a significant reduction in numbers of surgeries performed, office-based procedures such as corneal cross-linking and intravitreal injections, as well as laser for proliferative retinal diseases and maculopathy (Friedman P <0.001).

Table 2.

Changes in Ophthalmology Residents’ Working Patterns During the Shutdown of Routine Services

(N = 129)	Markedly Reduced n (%)	Reduced n (%)	Same n (%)	Increased n (%)	Markedly Increased n (%)
Overall	59 (45.7%)	55 (42.6%)	8 (6.2%)	5 (3.9%)	2 (1.6%)
Surgical	121 (93.8%)	6 (4.7%)	1 (0.8%)	1 (0.8%)	0
Office-based Procedures	107 (82.9%)	16 (12.4%)	5 (3.9%)	1 (0.8%)	0
Laser clinic	95 (73.6%)	21 (16.3%)	13 (10.1%)	0	0
Outpatient	79 (61.2)	46 (35.7)	3 (2.3)	1 (0.8)	0
Emergencies	16 (12.4)	34 (26.4)	37 (28.7)	24 (18.6)	18 (14.0)

The resources to protect health staff against the risk of COVID-19 transmission as perceived by ophthalmic residents are summarized in Table 3. Our data indicate that programs provided masks to 92.2% of the respondents. Around 72% received gowns, and 75.2% also received gloves. Besides that, built-in shields for slit lamps were provided, as stated by 72.1% of the participants. However, other protective equipment types such as face shields and goggles were only provided for 17.8% and 20.9% of the participants, respectively. Additionally, 83.7% of participants stated that programs provided updated protocols and guidelines on limiting SARS-CoV-2 transmission; however, according to 62%, there was a delay in providing these guidelines and protocols. Moreover, the majority of the participants reported that the recommended precautionary measures were implemented, such as providing PPE for patients and staff, screening and triaging at entry gates for both patients and staff, practicing social or physical distancing by limiting the number of people sitting in waiting areas or offices to 4 individuals in each room, shifting to telemedicine or virtual consultations.

Table 3.

Personal Protective Equipment and Infection Control Measures Provided to Ophthalmology Residents by Their Training Programs

		Number	Percentage
Masks	Yes	119	92.2
	No	10	7.8
Face shield	Yes	23	17.8
	No	106	82.2
Goggles	Yes	27	20.9
	No	102	79.1
Gown	Yes	93	72.1
	No	36	27.9
Built-in shield at the slit-lamp	Yes	93	72.1
	No	36	27.9
Gloves	Yes	97	75.2
	No	32	24.8
Updated infection control guidelines and protocols	Yes	28	21.7
	Delayed	80	62.0
	No	9	7.0
Implementation of recommended precautionary measures	Yes	96	92.5
	No	27	20.9
Implementation of telemedicine and virtual consultations	Yes	67	51.9
	No	62	48.1

One hundred eight participants replied to the questions regarding the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health. Eight (5.6%) residents reported no effect. Mild and moderate depressive symptoms were observed in 47 (33.1%) and 37 (26.1%) of the trainees. Sixteen (11.3%) ophthalmology residents scored high (severe depressive symptoms) in the PHQ-9 scale. As many as 34 (23.9%) participants did not respond to this part of the survey. (Figure 1)

Figure 1.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on ophthalmology residents’ mental health (n=108).

Ophthalmology Resident’s feedback on web-based training during the COVID-19 pandemic suggested that One (0.8%) resident was highly dissatisfied, 29 (22.8%) were dissatisfied, 67 (52.8%) were satisfied, and 18 (14.2%) were highly satisfied with the web-based ophthalmic education. Twenty-four residents did not respond, and three residents said they did not attend any web-based training. The majority of residents 111 (78.4%) used Zoom, one resident (0.8%) used the Microsoft team, and three residents (2.4%) used other tools. (Table 4).

Table 4.

The Feedback of Ophthalmology Residents on Web-Based Teaching

		Number	Percentage
Use of web-based trained	Yes	127	89.4
	No	3	2.1
	Did not respond	24	16.9
Grade of satisfaction	Highly satisfied	18	14.2
	Satisfied	67	52.8
	Cannot say	12	9.4
	Dissatisfied	29	22.8
	Highly dissatisfied	1	0.8
The preferred platform for web-based teaching	Zoom	111	87.4
	Microsoft	1	0.8
	Other	3	2.4
	Missing	12	9.4

Regarding the questions related to the COVID-19 duties and infection, 26 (18.3%) residents were deployed to COVID-19 areas. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was negative in 58 (40.8%) trainees. At the time of conducting the current survey, the test result of 8 (5.2%) residents was pending. Six (4.2%) of the residents were tested positive. Regarding the source of infection, one resident got the infection from a family member while the rest did not know its source. One resident was hospitalized, two received supportive treatment. Residents with COVID-19 positive status were looked after through the local employee health clinic. Also, their program directors frequently inquired about their health.

Discussion

The current cross-sectional study aimed to explore COVID-19 related experiences and perceptions of ophthalmology residents in various Saudi programs. Additionally, we aimed to assess their mental wellness during the current pandemic.

According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),¹³ and international ophthalmic societies,⁴ hospitals were asked to postpone routine services such as outpatient clinics and elective surgical procedures to reduce COVID-19 transmission risk and conserve healthcare resources. Our data clearly illustrates the significant impact of these measures on the ophthalmology residency training programs in Saudi Arabia. The participants in this study believed that their training was severely affected. They reported a significant reduction in routine outpatient care and a dramatic decline in exposure to surgical training and minor procedures such as injections and lasers. However, no changes were noted in residents’ emergency care exposure as emergency departments continued to run normally during the lockdown. These findings are in line with the recently published data from various residency programs worldwide.^8,9,14–23 In the United Kingdom, 87% were concerned about the impact of COVID-19 on their training, specifically their surgical exposure and postponement of the board certification examinations.²⁴

Globally, the supply of personal protective equipment (PPE) is limited. The WHO has released guidance on how to optimize the PPE supply in case of shortage.²⁵ In this study, we investigated the availability of PPE for ophthalmology residents. Our data indicated that most participants were provided with PPE, built-in shields for slit-lamps, and updated protocols and guidelines on how to limit SARS-CoV-2 transmission. These protocols included providing PPE for all patients and staff, screening and triaging at entry gates for both patients and staff, limiting the number of people sitting in waiting areas or offices to 4 individuals in each room, shifting to telemedicine, or virtual consultations.

Despite implementing precautionary measures, several studies reported that trainees were afraid of contracting the disease or transmitting it to their families.¹⁶ Such fears may negatively influence the physician’s critical thinking and decision making.¹⁶ In our survey, we used Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to measure the severity of depression among trainees.¹¹ Nearly half of the responded participants to this part of the questionnaire demonstrated mild to moderate depressive symptoms, while around 11% have severe symptoms. Civantos et al reported a high prevalence of burnout (21.8%), anxiety (47.9%), and distress (60.2%) among otolaryngology residents and attending physicians. Moreover, 10.6% of the participants in their study scored positive for depression symptoms using the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire.²⁶ In another study by Robbins et al, the current pandemic negatively impacted the morale of 44.8% of the residents.²⁷ Also, Khanna et al found that many ophthalmologists who participated in their study were psychologically affected.²⁸ Overall, the findings in our study are alarming. Seeking Services that support the mental well-being of the trainees should be facilitated and encouraged. Mishra et al²³ also reported that 54.8% of their study participants were stressed. Additionally, they also reported that 46.5% of their study participants were “unhappy” during the lockdown.²³

Redeployment of trainees to other areas of need during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased anxiety levels, especially if not proceeded with special training.²⁹ In our study, only 18% of participants were asked to provide care in areas designated for COVID-19 patients’ care.

Six residents in our sample contracted the disease, and all of them received support and inquiry about their health from their program directors. Interestingly, in a study conducted by Khusid et al, the residency program’s support was associated with a lower level of anxiety and depression.¹⁸

This pandemic has provided a unique opportunity for innovative teaching methods. As part of maintaining physical distancing, grand rounds and lectures are now delivered using virtual platforms and software. Moreover, this new teaching method allows recording the lectures to be stored later and accessed by those interested. Under the umbrella of the Saudi Commission for health specialties (SCFHS), ophthalmology residency programs have organized and overseen more than 110 virtual teaching sessions in April 2020 alone.³⁰ According to our data, nearly half of the participants were satisfied with the new method. In line with this finding, this distance method of teaching was welcomed by participants in several studies.^9,20,31,32 After the pandemic concludes, medical education will likely adopt this teaching method in addition to traditional face-to-face education.^8,20

This study, however, has several limitations that are important to be acknowledged. We did not inquire whether participants tried to contact the SCFHS mental health support services “Daem” or not.³³ Additionally, we did not investigate whether these depressive symptoms are new or due to preexisting mental health conditions. In this study, 34 (23.9%) did not respond to questions related to mental health. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility of a non-response bias. Those who did not respond to this part of the questionnaire may not have experienced mental health issues.

We did not inquire about the reasons for dissatisfaction reported by approximately 20% of the participants regarding virtual education, whether these reasons were related to technical difficulties or was the time to conduct these activities unsuitable. As these lectures were mostly broadcasted in the evening time, conflicting with family responsibilities.

Despite these limitations, our study has several strengths. Compared to other studies, the response rate in our study is high (77.6%).^17,18,26,34 Additionally, we used a validated questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), to assess depressive symptoms.¹²

In summary, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly altered the face of medical education and training. During the current crisis, clinical and surgical training has been disrupted. Therefore, the adoption of alternative teaching methods is critical. We believe that COVID-19 had significantly impacted trainees’ mental health currently enrolled in the Saudi ophthalmology residency programs. Access to psychological support programs should be facilitated and encouraged. Fortunately, the current pandemic provided the ophthalmology community with a great unique opportunity to boost knowledge. In the future, besides traditional teaching, E-learning will continue to be used in medical education. Flexibility, embracing changes, and frequent curriculum revisions and evaluation will enable training programs to ensure continuity of a high-quality education even at disastrous events.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest for this work.