Skip to main content
Eye and Brain logoLink to Eye and Brain
. 2020 Nov 3;12:139–167. doi: 10.2147/EB.S277760

Neuro-ophthalmic Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review

Caberry W Yu 1, Matthew Yau 2, Natalie Mezey 1, Ishraq Joarder 3, Jonathan A Micieli 4,5,
PMCID: PMC7648547  PMID: 33173368

Abstract

Objective

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel cancer therapies that may be associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and come to the attention of neuro-ophthalmologists. This systematic review aims to synthesize the reported ICI-associated IRAEs relevant to neuro-ophthalmologists to help in the diagnosis and management of these conditions.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature indexed by MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases was searched from inception to May 2020. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Primary studies on ICIs and neuro-ophthalmic complications were included. Outcomes included number of cases and incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs.

Results

Neuro-ophthalmic complications of ICIs occurred in 0.46% of patients undergoing ICI and may affect the afferent and efferent visual systems. Afferent complications include optic neuritis (12.8%), neuroretinitis (0.9%), and giant cell arteritis (3.7%). Efferent complications include myasthenia gravis (MG) (45.0%), thyroid-like eye disease (11.9%), orbital myositis (13.8%), general myositis with ptosis (7.3%), internuclear ophthalmoplegia (0.9%), opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome (0.9%), and oculomotor nerve palsy (0.9%). Pembrolizumab was the most common causative agent for neuro-ophthalmic complications (32.1%). Mortality was highest for MG (19.8%). Most patients (79.8%) experienced improvement or complete resolution of neuro-ophthalmic symptoms due to cessation of ICI and immunosuppression with systemic corticosteroids.

Conclusion

While incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs is low, clinicians involved in the care of cancer patients must be aware of their presentation to facilitate prompt recognition and management. Collaboration between oncology and neuro-ophthalmology teams is required to effectively manage patients and reduce morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer immunotherapy, CTLA-4 inhibitors, PD-1 inhibitors, PD-L1 inhibitors

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel immunologic monoclonal antibodies that block inhibitory receptors of the immune system, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1), and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1).1 They are increasingly used as cancer therapies for cancers such as melanoma due to their activation of specific antitumor T-cell immune responses.2 These immune checkpoint molecules maintain immune homeostasis and prevent autoimmunity, but are also used by cancers to suppress normal antitumor immune responses.1,2 CTLA-4, located on T-cells, regulates T-cell activity in the priming phase by preferentially binding to B7 on antigen-presenting cells. CTLA-4 inhibitors decrease the preferential binding between CTLA-4 and cluster of differentiation 28 (CD28) to allow binding of CD28 to B7 to occur and activate T-cells, thereby enhancing antitumor activity.3 PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors work by inhibiting the PD-1 (expressed on T or B cells) and the PD-L1 (expressed on cells like tumor cells) interaction that dampens immune response.4 There are currently seven ICIs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, cemiplimab, atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab.

Due to their efficacious antitumor responses in advanced malignancies, ICIs are increasingly used, and potential new ICIs are investigated in clinical trials. However, there are frequent toxicities associated with their use that can lead to their discontinuation. The toxicities that occur due to immune system activation are termed immune-related adverse events (IRAEs), which can occur in 70–90% of patients and affect any organ system.5,6 The skin and gastrointestinal systems are most affected by ICIs and usually involve low-grade IRAEs such as rashes, diarrhea, and nausea.7,8 ICIs have also been associated with de novo endocrinopathies or exacerbations of existing ones.9 Ophthalmic IRAEs have been reported in less than 1% of patients, common examples include anterior uveitis and dry eye.1012

Neuro-ophthalmic complications warrant their own investigation and can present with higher morbidity and mortality than IRAEs of other systems.7 Currently, established guidelines for the management of IRAEs contain very few neuro-ophthalmic conditions (eg myasthenia gravis (MG), general myositis and thyroid eye disease) and have been nonspecific in describing the unique complications in neuro-ophthalmology.13 While there have been systematic reviews on ophthalmic10,14 and neurologic1517 complications alone, they focus on complications like uveitis or central nervous system disorders that may not involve the visual pathways. No systematic reviews exist on neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs specifically. Thus, the present review was conducted to investigate the neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs of ICIs to collate information on presentation, treatment, and outcome to guide diagnosis and management.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions18 and the reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.19

Search Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched from inception to May 8, 2020 (complete search strategy available in Table S1). Articles were limited to English language with no year restrictions. A manual search of references in original studies and reviews and editorials was also conducted. When full-texts were unavailable, library copies were requested. Covidence was used to manage records identified by the literature search.20

Eligibility Criteria and Study Selection

All published articles on ICIs and neuro-ophthalmic outcomes were considered for inclusion. Reviews were used to identify potential eligible articles, but excluded from final analysis. The primary outcomes of the review were the number of cases and incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs. These included complications of the afferent visual system (eg, optic neuritis; giant cell arteritis, GCA; neuroretinitis), efferent visual system (eg, MG, thyroid-like eye disease, orbital myositis, orbital apex syndrome, oculomotor nerve palsies), and other disorders (eg Tolosa–Hunt Syndrome, neuromyelitis optica). Neurological conditions such as MG were only included if ocular symptoms were involved.

Each study was reviewed by two reviewers, independently and in duplicate, by title and abstract, and subsequently by full text, with discrepancies resolved by an independent third reviewer. During abstract screening, all clinical trials, cohort studies, and case series on side effects not specific to neuro-ophthalmology with ICIs were included for full-text review to ensure that papers that only mentioned neuro-ophthalmic outcomes in the full-text were included.

Data Collection and Synthesis

Data extraction occurred for each study using predefined data abstraction forms in accordance with PRISMA. Extracted data included study characteristics (eg, author, publication year, country, study design), patient demographics (eg, age, sex, cancer type), intervention (eg ICI name, cycles and duration prior to onset), and outcome (eg, neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis, presentation, treatment, and final outcome). Prevalence was also collected for observational studies and clinical trials. Risk of bias was not assessed due to the higher number of case reports and series included. Qualitative analysis was carried out for each neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis reported. Quantitative analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel to calculate mean incidence or mortality of diagnoses when more than one pharmacovigilance or clinical trial reported such data. Overall prevalence of neuro-ophthalmic complications was calculated by dividing the number of cases of neuro-ophthalmic complications in included clinical trials and observational studies by the total number of patients who received ICIs in these studies.

Results

From 3507 abstracts obtained from the search strategy, 2469 abstracts were screened after de-duplication, and 394 full texts were reviewed. Of these, 115 papers met our inclusion criteria. Figure 1 depicts a PRISMA flow diagram.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PRISMA chart for screening process, PRISMA figure adapted from Liberati A, Altman D, Tezlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2009;62(10). Creative Commons.

Study Characteristics

Of the 115 included studies, 98 were case reports or series and 17 were retrospective chart reviews or clinical trials that reported incidence of neuro-ophthalmic complications. Table 1 provides a summary of these observational or pharmacovigilance studies.2138 Tables 26 detail 109 individual cases (including cases described in observational studies) of optic neuritis/neuroretinitis, neuromuscular disorders, orbital disorders, GCA, and other diseases. A breakdown of the diagnoses can be found in Table 7. Of the cases, 31.2% of all patients with a neuro-ophthalmic complication were female. The mean (range) age at presentation was 66.5 (9–87) years. Cutaneous melanoma was the most common indication for ICI treatment for (48/109, 44.0%), followed by non-squamous cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (19/109, 17.4%). Pembrolizumab was the most common causative agent for neuro-ophthalmic complications (35/109, 32.1%), followed by nivolumab (27/109, 24.8%), ipilimumab (23/109, 21.1%), combination of ICIs (17/109, 15.6%), and atezolizumab (4/109, 3.7%). One case was reported for each of tremelimumab, durvalumab, and sintilimab. There were no reports on neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs for dostarlimab.

Table 1.

Summary of Observational Studies or Clinical Trials

Author Year Ref Purpose Cancer Type ICI Name Diagnosis Prevalence
Camacho 200921 Phase I and II study on safety of tremelimumab Metastatic melanoma Tremelimumab Thyroid-like eye disease 1 of 28 patients in phase I
Voskens 201322 Retrospective chart review on prevalence of IRAEs for ipilimumab Metastatic melanoma Ipilimumab Tolosa–Hunt Syndrome 1 of 752
Weber 201331 Phase I study evaluating safety and IRAEs of nivolumab with peptide vaccine in ipilimumab—refractory or —naïve melanoma Unresectable stage III or IV melanoma Nivolumab Optic neuritis 1 of 90
Hodi 201432 Phase I study on safety of bevacizumab plus ipilimumab inpatients with metastatic melanoma Metastatic melanoma Ipilimumab + bevacizumab Giant cell arteritis 1 of 46
Balar 201733 Phase II Study (KEYNOTE-052) evaluating safety of pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with urothelial cancer Advanced urothelial cancer Pembrolizumab Eyelid ptosis 1 of 370
Diehl 201734 Retrospective chart review on relationship between absolute lymphocyte counts and risk of IRAEs Lung cancer, melanoma, RCC, urothelial, HNSCC, Merkel cell carcinoma, and colon cancer Nivolumab or pembrolizumab Optic neuritis 1 of 167
Suzuki 201735 Safety databases based on postmarketing surveys in Japan investigating clinical features of myasthenia gravis induced by ICIs compared to idiopathic myasthenia gravis Melanoma, NSCLC, and colon cancer Nivolumab or ipilimumab Myasthenia gravis with myositis and myocarditis 12 of 10,277, including 4 with concurrent myositis
Omuro 201836 Phase I study (CheckMate 143) evaluating safety and IRAEs of nivolumab ± ipilimumab for glioblastoma Glioblastoma Nivolumab ± ipilimumab Optic neuritis 2 of 40
Touat 201837 Retrospective chart review on myositis for all ICIs, multicenter Melanoma, NSCLC, breast cancer, and renal cell cancer Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, or ipilimumab Myocarditis and myositis 10 cases of myositis
Kao 201738 Retrospective cohort study on prevalence of neurological complications in all patients receiving anti-PD-1 therapy at one centre Malignant melanoma and other solid-organ tumors Pembrolizumab or nivolumab Necrotizing myopathy, bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia 1 of 347 necrotizing myopathy, 1 of 347 bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia
Kaur 201923 Retrospective chart review on IRAEs at one centre for all ICIs Melanoma, NSCLC, renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, clear cell sarcoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell cancer Pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, or combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab Optic neuritis 1 of 220
Mancone 201824 Retrospective chart review on prevalence of neurologic IRAEs at one centre Squamous cell lung carcinoma Nivolumab Oculomotor nerve palsy 1 of 526
Johnson 201925 Disproportionality analysis using pharmacovigilance database to compare neurologic IRAEs in patients receiving ICI vs control Lung cancer, melanoma, and other cancers Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, other anti-PD-1/PD-L1, anti CTLA-4 drugs, or combination of drugs Myasthenia gravis 228 of 48,653
Kim 201926 Retrospective chart review on ophthalmic IRAEs at one centre Metastatic cutaneous melanoma, uveal melanoma, NSCLC Nivolumab ± ipilimumab Optic neuritis 1 of 1474
Moreira 201927 Retrospective chart review on autoimmune neurological IRAEs at one centre for all ICIs Metastatic skin cancers Ipilimumab, tremelimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab All neurologic complications including myositis, myasthenia gravis (ocular involvement unknown) 38 cases of autoimmune neurological disorders
Safa 201928 Retrospective chart review on myasthenia gravis at one center for all ICIs Metastatic melanoma and other cancers Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, or other ICIs Myasthenia gravis 63 of 5898, including 24 with concurrent myositis
Seki 201929 Retrospective cohort study on inflammatory myopathy associated with PD-1 inhibitors NSCLC and other cancers Nivolumab or pembrolizumab Myositis with ocular involvement Of 19 cases of inflammatory myopathy, 13 had diplopia and 15 had ptosis
Williams 201930 Retrospective chart review of patients receiving ICIs to evaluate corticosteroid use in management of IRAEs at one centre Melanoma, lung cancer, RCC, HNSCC, and other cancers Nivolumab, ipilimumab, or pembrolizumab Optic neuritis 3 of 103

Abbreviations: IRAEs, immune-related adverse effects; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitors; PD-1, programmed death-1 receptor; NSCLC, non-squamous cell lung cancer; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Table 2.

Summary of Cases—Optic Neuritis or Neuroretinitis

Author Year Ref Age M/F Cancer Type ICI Name Cycles and Duration Before Symptoms Neuro-Ophthalmic Diagnosis Ophthalmic Presentation Treatment ICI Continued/Held/Terminated Neuro-Ophthalmic Outcome Follow-up Period (Months)
Boisseau 201742 27F Renal cell carcinoma Ipilimumab 5 cycles: then 5 weeks Optic neuritis OU: vision loss and optic disc edema IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 3 days then po steroid taper, PLEX 10 sessions Held Resolution (1 month) 6
Francis 202043 61F Melanoma Ipilimumab 3 cycles Optic neuritis OU: vision loss and optic disc edema Prednisone 80 mg with taper, topical prednisolone, timolol/dorzolamide Terminated Cecocentral detect OD 33
Francis 202043 71M NSCLC Pembrolizumab 3 cycles Optic neuritis OU: vision loss and optic disc edema/pallor IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 5 days, prednisone 80 mg with taper Terminated Disc pallor with resolved edema, thinning OU 7
Francis 202043 58M Small-cell lung carcinoma Ipilimumab and nivolumab 4 cycles Optic neuritis OU: vision loss IV methylprednisolone 1 gx5 days and 5 PLEX, prednisone 50 mg with taper over 6 months Terminated Pink OD, 4+ pallor OS 6
Hahn 201548 44M Melanoma Ipilimumab 3 infusions then 2 months Neuroretinitis OD metamorphopsia, OS scotoma, OU: eye pain, redness, photophobia, optic disc edema Prednisone 80 mg, gtts: prednisolone 1%, brimonidine 0.2%, timolol 0.5% TID OU Terminated Resolution (2 months) 2
Kartal 201845 9M Glioblastoma multiforme Nivolumab 2 cycles: then 2 days Optic neuritis OU: decreased vision, optic disc edema IV corticosteroids 1 g daily for 5 days Terminated Improvement 1 week
Kaur 201923 27F Melanoma Ipilimumab 4 cycles Optic neuritis NR Corticosteroids Continued Improvement NR
Kim 201926 61F Melanoma Ipilimumab and nivolumab 4 cycles of combination, 1 cycle of nivolumab monotherapy Optic neuritis OU: decreased VF, optic disc edema IVIg and infliximab Terminated Death (cancer progression) 18
Mori 201846 64M NSCLC Atezolizumab NR cycles: then 12 months Optic neuritis OS: sudden vision loss, optic disc edema, venous congestion without bleeding IV methylprednisolone 1 g for 3 days followed by 30 mg po prednisolone administration NR Resolution (24 months) 24
Noble 201911 65M Prostate cancer Durvalumab NR Optic neuritis OS: inferior scotoma with central sparing, EOM discomfort, optic disc edema IV corticosteroid bolus Continued Improvement NR
Samanci 201947 53M Lung adenocarcinoma Atezolizumab 1 cycle: then 20 days Optic neuritis OU: blurry vision, optic disc edema IV methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg followed by po methylprednisolone Terminated Resolution (1 month) 1
Sun 200839 72M Bladder cancer Ipilimumab 1 dose: then 3 weeks Optic neuritis OU: vision loss, optic disc edema IV dexamethasone 20 mg, then IV methylprednisolone 250 mg q6 h, later prednisone 100 mg daily then taper Terminated Improvement 24 weeks
Sun 202040 43M Melanoma Pembrolizumab NR Optic neuritis NR NR NR NR NR
Wilson 201641 53M Melanoma Ipilimumab 3 cycles: 4 months after start Optic neuritis OS: no light perception, optic disc edema, retinal whitening Prednisone, methylprednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil with prednisone, plasmapheresis Held Resolution (15 months) 17
Yeh 201544 67M Melanoma Ipilimumab 3 infusion: then 3 weeks Optic neuritis OU: left VF vision loss, photopsia, blurry vision, optic disc edema; OD reduced color vision gtts: prednisolone and atropine OU Terminated Normal visual acuity, persistent VF defects 6

Abbreviations: NSCLC, non-squamous cell lung cancer; OU, both eyes; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; IV, intravenous; po, per os; IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; NR, not reported; PLEX, plasma exchange; BID, twice daily; TID, three times daily; QID, four times daily.

Table 3.

Summary of Cases – Neuromuscular

Author Year Ref Age M/F Cancer Type ICI Name Cycles and Duration Before Symptoms Neuro-Ophthalmic Diagnosis Concomitant Myositis, CK Levels (IU/L) Ophthalmic Presentation Treatment ICI Continued/Held/Terminated Neuro-Ophthalmic Outcome Follow-up Period (Months)
Algaeed 201851 73M Melanoma Pembrolizumab NR cycles: then 3 weeks MG N OS: ptosis IVIg 2 g/kg daily, prednisone 60 mg daily, plasmapheresis 5 exchanges NR Improvement 5 weeks
Alnahhas 201652 84M Melanoma Pembrolizumab 2 cycles: then 2 months MG N OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia Prednisone 60 mg daily, pyridostigmine 60 mg TID, and IVIg 0.4 g/kg/day for 5 days Terminated Death (hypercapnic respiratory failure) 3 days
Becquart 201963 75F Melanoma Nivolumab 3 cycles (6 weeks) MG N OU: diplopia, ptosis Prostigmine 3 mg daily Continued Improvement, continued prostigmine 21
Chang 201774 75M Transitional cell carcinoma of bladder and ureter Nivolumab 2 doses: then 3 weeks MG N OU: diplopia, ptosis Pyridostigmine 90 mg QID, and IVIg 0.4 g/kg daily over 5 days Terminated Improvement in 6 days, death (unknown cause) 10 days 10 days
Chen 201785 57M NSCLC Nivolumab and ipilimumab 1 cycle ipilimumab, 2 cycles nivolumab: then 2 weeks MG Y, 2682 OD: ptosis IV prednisolone 2 mg/kg daily for 5 days followed by 1 mg/kg daily for 2 days, po pyridostigmine 60 mg TID Terminated Improvement, death (pneumonia) 1 week 1 week
Chen 201792 65M NSCLC Nivolumab 3 cycles: then 5 days MG Y, CK NR OU: ptosis Methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg daily and pyridostigmine 60 mg po BID Terminated Death (hypercapnic respiratory failure) 3 weeks
Cooper 201793 68F NSCLC Nivolumab 5 cycles: then 1 month MG exacerbation N OU: diplopia, ophthalmoplegia Pyridostigmine and prednisone at 60 mg daily, 5 exchanges of plasmapheresis Terminated Minimal improvement, hospice care 18 days
Crusz 201894 78M Melanoma Pembrolizumab 2 doses: then 6 days MG Y, 1109 OD: ptosis IVIg, pyridostigmine, later mycophenolate + PLEX, later rituximab 1 g infusion Terminated Resolution 4
Dhenin 201995 79F Lung adenocarcinoma Pembrolizumab 6 doses (22 weeks), then 3 months MG N OU: ptosis Pyridostigmine 60 mg, five times daily, IV methylprednisolone 80 mg daily Completed Resolution 3
Earl 201796 74M Melanoma Pembrolizumab 2 doses: then 12 days MG exacerbation N OD: impaired adduction, OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia IVIg 2 g/kg total, prednisone 80 mg daily, mycophenolate 1500 mg BID, pyridostigmine 120 mg TID, plasmapheresis Terminated Minimal improvement, death (unknown cause) NR
Fazel 201953 78F Melanoma Ipilimumab and nivolumab 1 cycle: then 5 days MG Y (systemic myositis), CK NR OU: diplopia, ptosis IV methylprednisolone 1000 mg daily for 3 days, IVIg 2 g/kg daily for 2 days Continued Worsened, hospice care 8 days
Fellner 201854 68M Melanoma Pembrolizumab 2 doses (5 weeks): then 2 weeks MG N OS: ptosis, esophoria Prednisone 10 mg daily then taper Held Resolution 6 weeks
Fukasawa 201755 69F Lung adenocarcinoma Nivolumab 3 cycles: then 1 week MG N OU: diplopia, OS: impaired adduction Methylprednisolone 1 g for 3 days followed by 1 mg/kg daily NR Improvement, continued steroids 36 days
Gonzalez 201756 71F Uterine carcinosarcoma Pembrolizumab 4 doses MG N OU: diplopia, ptosis, OS: impaired abduction po pyridostigmine up to 60 mg TID, prednisone 20 mg daily Held Resolution (3 weeks), death (cancer progression) 5 months 5
Hasegawa 201757 76F NSCLC Nivolumab 2 doses: then 26 days MG Y, 6566 OU: diplopia, OS: ptosis IVIg, PLEX 3 sessions, prednisolone 10 mg daily Terminated Improvement 85 days
Hibino 201858 83M Lung squamous cell carcinoma Pembrolizumab 2 cycles (on day 38 of treatment) MG Y, 4361 OU, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, diplopia po pyridostigmine 60 mg TID for 7 days NR Improvement 3
Huh 201759 34F Thymic squamous cell carcinoma Pembrolizumab 4 cycles MG Y, 2125 OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia IVIg for 5 days, IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 3 days, prednisolone 1 mg/kg daily, then 5 cycles of plasmapheresis Terminated Improvement, ptosis resolved, ophthalmoplegia persisted 6
Johnson 201560 69F Melanoma Ipilimumab 3 doses: then several days MG N OU: diplopia, ptosis Pyridostigmine 30 mg TID, then IV methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg and plasmapheresis, then 40 mg prednisone daily NR Improvement 3
Kim 201961 76M NSCLC Nivolumab 4 doses: then 3 days MG Y, 2934 OD: ptosis, diplopia IV methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg daily for 32 days, pyridostigmine 30 mg TID for 6 days and was increased to 60 mg TID, tapered to po prednisolone 40 mg BID Completed Improvement 8
Konstantina 201962 30F Type B3 thymoma Pembrolizumab 1 dose: then 3 days Myasthenic crisis Y, CK NR Unilateral ptosis, diplopia Corticosteroids and pyridostigmine 400 mg/kg for 5 days, then rituximab 375/m2 for 3 weeks Terminated Death (septic shock) 54 days
Lara 201964 63F NSCLC-adenocarcinoma Pembrolizumab 2 cycles MG N OU: ptosis, EOM palsies IVIg, high-dose corticosteroid therapy, and pyridostigmine Terminated Improvement NR
Lau 201665 75M Melanoma Pembrolizumab 5 weeks MG N OS: ptosis IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 5 days, IVIg 0.5 g/kg daily for 4 days, discharged with prednisone 60 mg daily Held Resolution 4
Liao 201466 70F Melanoma Ipilimumab 2 cycles: then 1 week MG Y, 1200 OU: ptosis Plasmapheresis daily for 3 days, 125 mg IV methylprednisolone daily Terminated Improvement 2 weeks
Liu 201967 73M Melanoma Pembrolizumab 2 doses: then <1 week MG N OU: ptosis IVIg 2 g/kg daily for 5 days, and IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 3 days Terminated Improvement 6 weeks
Loochtan 201568 70M SCLC Ipilimumab Day 16 MG N OU: diplopia, ptosis Prednisone 1 mg/kg daily, followed by 3 sessions of plasmapheresis, prednisone 90 mg daily Terminated Death (septic shock, cardiac, ulcers) 22 days
Maeda 201669 79M Melanoma Nivolumab 3 doses: day 106 MG exacerbation Y, 1627 OU: diplopia None Held Resolution (timing NR) 9
Mancano 201870 76F NSCLC Nivolumab 2 doses: day 26 Myasthenic crisis Y, 6566 OS: ptosis IVIg for 2 days, then immunoadsorption plasmapheresis therapy and IVIg for 5 days, prednisolone 10 mg daily NR Improvement 65 days
March 201771 63M NSCLC Pembrolizumab 1 dose: then 2 weeks MG Y, 10,386 OD: ptosis, blurry vision, periorbital edema with mild erythema Pyridostigmine 120 mg q6 h and prednisone 60 mg daily, methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 9 days, 5 IVIg treatments, 4 plasmapheresis rounds Terminated Death (respiratory failure) 12 days
Mitsune 201872 62M Neuroendocrine carcinoma of trachea Nivolumab 2 cycles: day 25 MG exacerbation Y, 14,229 OU: diplopia, ptosis IV methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg daily Terminated Resolution 60 days
Mohn 201973 82M Melanoma Nivolumab 1 dose: then 8 weeks MG Y, 2000 OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia IV methylprednisolone 1000mg daily for 5 days, then IVIg Terminated Improvement, death (blood loss) at 8 weeks 8 weeks
Mohn 201973 87F Melanoma Nivolumab 1 dose: then 4 weeks MG Y, CK NR OU: ptosis Prednisolone 100mg daily Terminated Death (cause unknown) 12 days
Montes 201875 74M Melanoma Ipilimumab 3 doses: then 1 day MG N OU: diplopia, OD: ophthalmoplegia High-dose corticosteroids and pyridostigmine Terminated Improvement, diplopia persisted, continued steroids 1
Nakatani 201850 73F Lung squamous cell carcinoma Nivolumab 25 doses: at 51 weeks Lambert–Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome N OU: photophobia, ptosis po prednisolone 20 mg daily for 7 days, pyridostigmine and ambenonium, 3,4-DAP Restarted then terminated Improvement 16
Nguyen 201776 81M Melanoma Pembrolizumab 3 cycles: then 2 weeks MG N OU: ptosis Prednisolone 25 mg daily then taper Continued Resolution 6
Nguyen 201776 86F Melanoma Pembrolizumab 2 cycles MG N OU: ptosis IV methylprednisolone 500 mg daily for 5 days, then po prednisolone taper Continued Improvement 3
Onda 201977 73M Lung adenocarcinoma Pembrolizumab Day 23 MG Y, 7311 OU: diplopia, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia Prednisolone total 20 mg, methylprednisolone 1g daily for 3 days NR Resolution 4
Phua 202078 66M Lung adenocarcinoma Durvalumab 5 doses: then 3 days MG Y, 499 OU: diplopia, ptosis Prednisone 60 mg daily, pyridostigmine 120 mg TID, mycophenolate mofetil 1 g BID, IVIg 2 g/kg Terminated Improvement 2
Polat 201679 65M NSCLC Nivolumab 3 doses: then 3 days MG N OU: blurry vision, diplopia, ptosis Pyridostigmine 45 mg q6 h for 6 weeks Completed Resolution (6 weeks) 4
Sciacca 201680 81M NSCLC Nivolumab 3 cycles MG N OU: blurry vision, diplopia, ptosis Prednisone 50 mg daily for 4 weeks Terminated Resolution (4 weeks) 1
So 201981 55F Melanoma Nivolumab 2 doses: then 1 day Myasthenic crisis Y, CK NR OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia IVIg 0.5 g/kg daily for 5 days, 4 cycles of steroid pulse, 2 cycles of PLEX Terminated Improvement 6
Takai 202082 77M Bladder cancer Pembrolizumab 1 dose: then 20 days MG Y, 8574 OU: diplopia, ptosis Prednisone 80 mg daily, IVIg at 0.4 g/kg daily for 5 days Terminated Death (cardiac arrest) 13 days
Tan 201783 45M NSCLC Nivolumab 1 dose: then 2 weeks MG Y, CK NR OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia Pyridostigmine, methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 3 days, and IVIg 400 mg/kg daily for 5 days Held for 5 months Improvement 5
Tedbirt 201984 77M Melanoma Pembrolizumab and nivolumab 4 doses MG N OU: ptosis, visual disorders (unspecified) IVIg 0.4 g/kg daily for 5 days, pyridostigmine 360 mg daily, prednisone 60 mg daily Held for 5 months Recurrence of myasthenic syndrome, improvement 29
Thakolwiboon 201986 87M Urothelial carcinoma Atezolizumab 2 doses MG Y, 1542 OU: diplopia, ptosis Prednisone 60 mg daily for 1 week, IVIg 0.4 g/kg daily, low-dose pyridostigmine Terminated Death (cardiac arrest) 10 days
Tozuka 201887 82M Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma Pembrolizumab 3 cycles: then 44 days MG with agranulocytosis N OU: diplopia Pyridostigmine 60 mg TID Terminated NR NR
Veccia
202088
65M Lung squamous cell carcinoma Nivolumab 2 doses: day 27 MG Y, 3844 OU: diplopia, OD: ptosis IVIg 0.4 mg/kg daily for 5 days, pyridostigmine 60 mg daily for 1 week, IV dexamethasone 8 mg BID, prednisone 1 mg/kg daily Terminated Worsened, death 7 weeks
Werner 201989 62M Melanoma Nivolumab and ipilimumab 2 doses: then 1 week MG N OD: ptosis Pyridostigmine 300 mg daily, prednisone 20 mg daily Held for 6 weeks Resolution (6 weeks) 2
Wilson 201891 57M Lung adenocarcinoma Pembrolizumab 4 weeks MG N OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia Corticosteroids and pyridostigmine 400 mg/kg daily for 5 days, followed by rituximab 375 mg/m2 for 3 weeks Terminated Resolution, death (cancer progression) 6
Wilson 201891 62F Melanoma Nivolumab and ipilimumab 4 weeks MG N OU: ptosis Pyridostigmine and corticosteroids Terminated Resolution 12
Xing 202090 66M Lung adenocarcinoma Sintilimab 2 doses: then 4 days Myasthenic crisis Y, 11,919 OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia Pyridostigmine bromide 120 mg BIG, IV methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg daily, IVIg 400 mg/kg daily for 5 days, PLEX Terminated Improvement 3

Abbreviations: NSCLC, non-squamous cell lung cancer; OU, both eyes; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; IV, intravenous; po, per os; IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; NR, not reported; PLEX, plasma exchange; BID, twice daily; TID, three times daily; QID, four times daily; MG, myasthenia gravis.

Table 4.

Summary of Cases— Orbit

Author Year Ref Age M/F Cancer Type ICI Name Cycles and Duration Before Symptoms Neuro-Ophthalmic Diagnosis For Myositis: EOMs Normal or Abnormal Size Ophthalmic Presentation Treatment ICI Continued/Held/Terminated Neuro-Ophthalmic Outcome Follow-up Period (Months)
Borodic 2011100 51F Melanoma Ipilimumab 2 infusions TEDa OU: diplopia, proptosis Cantholysis, corticosteroids NR Resolution NR
Campredon 2018101 61M NSCLC Nivolumab 3 infusions TED OU: ptosis, conjunctival injection with chemosis, proptosis, ophthalmoplegia IV methylprednisolone 1 g for 2 weeks, 500 mg for 4 weeks, and 250 mg for 5 weeks Terminated Improvement of chemosis, ptosis and ophthalmoplegia unchanged, death (massive hemoptysis) 13 weeks
McElnea 2014104 68F Melanoma Ipilimumab 3 cycles (4 doses each): then 5 weeks TED OU: ophthalmoplegia IV methylprednisolone 1 g for 5 days and po prednisolone 60 mg daily for 1 week then taper Terminated Improvement 6 weeks
Min 2011105 51F Melanoma Ipilimumab 4 doses (8 weeks) TEDa OU: eye pain, proptosis, conjunctival injection, periorbital edema IV methylprednisolone 250 mg q6h for 12 doses, prednisone 100 mg BID then taper NR Improvement 12
Park 2018107 52M Merkel cell carcinoma Pembrolizumab 3 doses (6 weeks) TEDa (euthyroid) OU: diplopia, proptosis Prednisone daily, ocular lubricants and po atenolol, Fresnel prisms (diplopia) Terminated Improvement 3
Rhea 2018106 83M Melanoma Ipilimumab and pembrolizumab 1 infusion of ipilimumab: then 3 days; 1 infusion of pembrolizumab: then 1 day TEDa OU: diplopia, blurry vision, proptosis, chemosis Prednisone 60 mg daily Continued Resolution then recurrence 10
Ricciuti 2017102 63F Non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer Nivolumab 6 cycles: then 7 months TED OU: diplopia, blurry vision, ophthalmoplegia, exophthalmos High-dose steroids Held for 6 months Resolution 6
Sabini 2018108 70M Lung adenocarcinoma Tremelimumab and durvalumab 1 month TEDa OU: diplopia, exophthalmos, ophthalmoplegia Prednisone 25 mg daily then taper Terminated Persistent bilateral orbitopathy with primary gaze diplopia and ophthalmoplegia 6
Sagiv 2019103 42M Renal cell carcinoma Nivolumab 4 doses (2 months) TED OU: diplopia, eyelid retraction NR Continued Resolution 24
Sagiv 2019103 51M Melanoma Tremelimumab 6 months TEDa OU: diplopia, periocular swelling and erythema, exophthalmos. Methylprednisolone 125 mg daily then taper Continued Resolution 3
Bitton 2019109 80M NSCLC Pembrolizumab 2 infusions: then 1 day Orbital myositis NR OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia OD ophthalmoplegia OS Systemic corticosteroid 1 mg/kg daily, IVIg 2 g/kg daily, methotrexate 15 mg per week Terminated Resolution 6
Haddox 2017111 78M Melanoma Pembrolizumab 2 cycles: then 2 weeks Orbital myositis NA OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia Prednisone 1 mg/kg, after 1 week: PLEX Terminated Worsened, death (respiratory failure) 3 days
Henderson 2015112 55M Melanoma Ipilimumab 3 cycles Orbital myositis Abnormal size OU: burning, injection, FB sensation, photophobia, diplopia, chemosis, ophthalmoplegia, ptosis, periorbital edema Prednisone Terminated Improvement with persistent abduction deficit OS and binocular diplopia NR
Kamo 2019113 78M Renal, pelvis, and ureter cancer Pembrolizumab NR Orbital myositis Abnormal size OU: ophthalmoplegia, ptosis IV methylprednisolone, PLEX Terminated Improvement, death (cancer progression) NR
Kamo 2019113 72F Lung cancer Pembrolizumab NR Orbital myositis Abnormal size OU: ophthalmoplegia, OD: ptosis Prednisone 0.5 mg/kg daily then taper NR Resolution NR
Liewluck 2018114 78M Melanoma Pembrolizumab 2 cycles (28 days) Orbital myositis Normal size (assumed) OU: diplopia, proptosis Prednisone, PLEX Terminated Death (respiratory failure) NR
Liewluck 2018114 68M Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma Pembrolizumab 2 cycles (30 days) Orbital myositis Abnormal size OU: diplopia, proptosis IV methylprednisolone, prednisone, and PLEX Terminated Resolution NR
Liewluck 2018114 55M Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma Pembrolizumab 4 cycles (72 days) Orbital myositis NR OU: diplopia Prednisone Terminated Resolution NR
Nardin 2018115 68M Melanoma Ipilimumab 51 cycles (3 years) Orbital myositis Abnormal size OU: diplopia, eyelid swelling and retraction, proptosis, ophthalmoplegia, OD: retro-orbital pain, redness IV methylprednisolone 500 mg weekly for 3 months, then prednisone 1 mg/kg daily Terminated Resolution 10
Nasr 2018116 79M Gastric adenocarcinoma Pembrolizumab 2 doses: then 2 weeks Orbital myositis Abnormal size OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia IV prednisone 1 mg/kg daily, IVIg 2 mg/kg for 4 days, pyridostigmine 10 mg daily Terminated No improvement, death (cause NR) NR
Patel 2016110 39M Melanoma Ipilimumab 4 cycles: then 4 days Orbital myositis Abnormal size OU: blurry vision, diplopia Prednisone up to 125 mg daily, later IV steroids NR Resolution 3
Pushkarevskaya 2017117 60F Melanoma Ipilimumab 2 cycles (4 doses each): then 2 months Orbital myositis Abnormal size OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia IV methylprednisolone, mycophenolate mofetil 3 g daily, IVIg 2 g/kg monthly Terminated Improvement with minor difficulties with distant vision 11
Pushkarevskaya 2017117 60F Melanoma Ipilimumab 2 cycles: then 2 weeks Orbital myositis Abnormal size OU: ophthalmoplegia, blurry vision, diplopia Prednisolone up to 160 mg daily, then mycophenolate mofetil 3g daily Continued Resolution 3
Sagiv 2019103 73M Bladder urothelial carcinoma Nivolumab and ipilimumab 3 doses Orbital myositis NR OU: diplopia, periocular pain, ophthalmoplegia, exophthalmos, conjunctival injection, eyelid edema and erythema Methylprednisolone 1g daily for 3 days, 80mg prednisone BID then tapered to 60 mg daily Continued Resolution (2 weeks), death (cancer progression, 1 months) 1
Valenti-Azcarate 2020118 66M NSCLC Nivolumab and Ipilimumab 2 cycles (4 weeks) Orbital myositis NR (MRI showed “inflammation” did not specify which muscle) OU: diplopia IV prednisolone 2 mg/kg daily Continued Improvement, death (cancer progression) 2
Williams 2020119 69M Prostate adenocarcinoma Nivolumab and Ipilimumab 2 cycles Orbital myositis Normal size OS: ptosis IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily, plasmapheresis, IVIg 4 cycles, and mycophenolate mofetil Terminated Resolution (6 months), death (cancer progression) 12
Hassanzadeh
2017120
64F Melanoma Ipilimumab NR Orbital apex syndrome OD: vision loss, right RAPD, proptosis, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 7 days, then taper prednisone 1mg/kg Terminated Persistent esotropia on prednisone 10 mg daily 6
Voskens 201322 65M Melanoma Ipilimumab 1 dose: then 18 weeks Tolosa–Hunt Syndrome Unilateral headache, OU: diplopia, OD: pain, epiphora, mydriasis, ptosis, paresis of oculomotor nerve IV methylprednisolone, oral dexamethasone, local radiotherapy (10⨰3 Gy) Terminated Improvement of pain and paresis, visual disturbance persisted NR

Note: aAssociated with Graves’ disease.

Abbreviations: NSCLC, non-squamous cell lung cancer; OU, both eyes; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; IV, intravenous; po, per os; IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; NR, not reported; PLEX, plasma exchange; BID, twice daily; TID, three times daily; QID, four times daily; TED, thyroid-like eye disease.

Table 5.

Summary of Cases— Giant Cell Arteritis

Author Year Ref Age M/F Cancer Type ICI Name Cycles and Duration Before Symptoms Neuro-Ophthalmic Diagnosis Ophthalmic Presentation Treatment ICI Continued/Held/Terminated Outcome and Follow-up Period Follow-up Period (Months)
Betrains 2020121 72F Melanoma Nivolumab 30 cycles GCA Blurry vision, proximal myalgia, frontal headache, temporal artery tenderness, jaw claudication Prednisolone 1 mg/kg then taper Held Resolution (timeline NR) 12
Chow 2020122 69M Pleural mesothelioma Nivolumab and ipilimumab 5 months (weekly treatment) GCA 1st visit: blurry vision, fatigue, myalgia; 2nd visit: diplopia, scalp tenderness, jaw claudication; 3rd visit: transient amaurosis fugax High dose prednisolone Terminated at 8 months Resolution (4 days) 10
Goldstein 2014123 62M Melanoma Ipilimumab 5 cycles: then 1 week GCA Transient diplopia, amaurosis fugax, occipital headache, scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, proximal myalgia Prednisone 60 mg daily Completed Resolution (2 days) 6
Hid Cadena 2018124 70M Melanoma Nivolumab or ipilimumab (clinical trial), then another ICI 9 months GCA Scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, proximal myalgia, no visual complaints Prednisolone 60 mg daily then taper Terminated, then started on another ICI Persistence of low-grade symptoms 13
Micaily 2017125 88F NSCLC Pembrolizumab 1 dose: then 1 week GCA OS: sudden onset blindness High dose prednisone Held Resolution (timeline NR) NR

Abbreviations: NSCLC, non-squamous cell lung cancer; OS, left eye; IV, intravenous; GCA, giant cell arteritis.

Table 6.

Summary of Cases— Other

Author Year Ref Age M/F Cancer Type ICI Name Cycles and Duration Before Symptoms Neuro-Ophthalmic Diagnosis For Myositis: EOMs Normal or Abnormal Size Ophthalmic Presentation Treatment ICI Continued/Held/Terminated Neuro-Ophthalmic Outcome Follow-up Period (Months)
Maller 2018134 74M Epithelioid mesothelioma Ipilimumab and nivolumab 2 ipilimumab and 5 nivolumab infusions: then 10 weeks Opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome OU: involuntary and conjugate horizontal eye movements IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily, IVIg 0.4 g/kg daily for 5 days, prednisone taper Completed Resolution 8 weeks
Alnabulsi 2018130 67M Melanoma Ipilimumab and nivolumab Day 10 Myositis Normal size OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia IV methylprednisolone up to 1 g daily IVIg 81 mg for 2 doses, IV infliximab 400 mg for 1 dose Terminated No improvement, death (cardiac arrest, multi-organ failure) NR
Bourgeois-Vionnet 2018126 79NR Lung adenocarcinoma Nivolumab 2 injections: then 1 week Myositis Normal size (assumed) OU: ptosis IVIg, po corticosteroids 1 mg/kg daily for 6 months Terminated Resolution 6
Carrera 2017131 68M NSCLC Tremelimumab and durvalumab 2 doses: then 4 days Myositis NR OU: diplopia, OS: hypertropia, ptosis 60 mg prednisone then taper Terminated Resolution (1 month) 6
Diamantopoulos 2017129 82M Melanoma Pembrolizumab 1 infusion: then 15 days Myositis NR OS: ptosis, miosis, OU: diplopia Prednisolone 75 mg, IVIg 0.3 g/kg daily, plasmapheresis Terminated Improvement, death (respiratory failure) 34 days
Hamada 2018128 83M Lung adenocarcinoma Pembrolizumab 2 cycles: then 1 week Myositis NR OD: ptosis Systemic prednisone 40 mg/day Terminated Resolution 2
Hellman 2019127 83M Urothelial carcinoma Pembrolizumab 2 cycles Myositis NR OU: ptosis, ophthalmoplegia Prednisone 1 mg/kg daily, later IV methylprednisolone Terminated Improvement, death (pneumothorax) 33 days
Kang 2018133 75M HNSCC Nivolumab 1 infusion: then 3 weeks Myositis Normal size (assumed) OU: ptosis IV methylprednisolone 80 mg daily for 3 weeks, then prednisone 100 mg daily, plasmapheresis, a trial of pyridostigmine 60 mg Terminated No improvement, death (cardiac arrest) 2
Khoo 2019132 80F Urothelial cancer Atezolizumab 8 weeks Myositis Normal size (assumed) OU: ptosis IV methylprednisolone 1 g daily for 3 days, IVIg 2 g/kg total dose, po prednisolone slow taper Terminated Improvement with residual ptosis 3
Kao 201738 Age NR, F Leiomyosarcoma Nivolumab 3 cycles Internuclear ophthalmoplegia OU: internuclear ophthalmoplegia Corticosteroid (dose NR) for 1 week Continued Improvement NR
Mancone 201824 75M Lung squamous cell carcinoma Nivolumab 3 cycles Oculomotor nerve palsy OU: diplopia, OD: ptosis Prednisone taper Terminated Resolution NR

Abbreviations: NSCLC, non-squamous cell lung cancer; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; OU, both eyes; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; IV, intravenous; po, per os; IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; NR, not reported; PLEX, plasma exchange; BID, twice daily; TID, three times daily; QID, four times daily; TED, thyroid-like eye disease.

Table 7.

Breakdown of Neuro-ophthalmic Diagnoses. Excludes Pharmacovigilance or Observational Trials That Do Not Include Details of the Patients

Neuro-ophthalmic primary diagnosis N % of Total (n=109)
Optic neuritis 14 12.8
Neuroretinitis 1 0.9
Myasthenia gravis* 49 45.0
Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome gravis* 1 0.9
Orbital myositis 15 13.8
Thyroid-like eye disease 13 11.9
Giant cell arteritis 4 3.7
General myositis* 8 7.3
Internuclear ophthalmoplegia 1 0.9
opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome 1 0.9
Oculomotor nerve palsy 1 0.9

Note: *With ocular involvement.

The overall incidence of neuro-ophthalmic outcomes following ICI therapy was 0.46%. The median time to symptom onset was two cycles and ranged from one to 51 doses. ICIs were terminated in most patients following neuro-ophthalmic complication (67/109, 61.5%). They were held in 12 patients (11.0%) and continued in 13 patients (11.9%). Death occurred in 20 of 109 patients (18.3%) due to various causes, including worsening symptoms or other causes prior to improvement of neuro-ophthalmic symptoms. Improvement in neuro-ophthalmic symptoms with persistent deficits (eg, ptosis, diplopia) at last follow-up was seen in 45 of 109 (41.3%) patients, while 42 of 109 (38.5%) patients experienced complete resolution of neuro-ophthalmic symptoms. Outcome was not reported in two patients.

Optic Neuritis

Optic neuritis11,23,26,30,31,34,36,3947 (n=12 case reports, n=9 in larger studies) and neuroretinitis48 (n=1) have been associated with various ICIs, most commonly with ipilimumab (60%). Pharmacovigilance studies showed a combined incidence of 9/2094 (0.43%) for ICI-associated optic neuritis. Of cases that reported laterality, optic neuritis was bilateral in most cases (9/12, 75.0%). While corticosteroids form the mainstay of the treatment, four of 14 patients (28.6%) required additional interventions: intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), plasma exchange (PLEX), infliximab, and/or mycophenolate mofetil. All cases experienced resolution (4/14) or improvement with residual symptoms or signs (eg, visual defects, disc pallor) (10/14). Hahn and Pepple reported a patient with neuroretinitis, which involved optic disc and macular edema that resolved with topical and systemic corticosteroids.48

Patients were only confirmed to have optic neuritis if abnormalities in optic nerve enhancement were shown on MRI and clinical presentation was consistent with optic neuritis as highlighted in a previous paper.49 This could not be confirmed for several cases.26,41,44,45

Neuromuscular Disorders

The most common disorder of neuromuscular transmission reported with ICI was MG. Only one case of Lambert–Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS) occurred with nivolumab, with symptoms improving with amifampridine.50 Forty-nine case reports of MG were found in the literature.5196 Pharmacovigilance studies suggested that ICI-associated MG has a combined incidence of 303/64,828 (0.47%).25,28,35 However, milder cases of MG may be underdiagnosed due to nonspecific symptoms such as weakness and fatigue. While few cases involved exacerbation of underlying MG (4/49, 8.2%), the rest were de novo (45/49, 91.8%).

Among the 49 cases, most (38/49, 77.6%) occurred with anti-PD-1 (eg, pembrolizumab, nivolumab). Pharmacovigilance studies also supported that MG occurred more commonly in anti-PD-1 (eg, pembrolizumab or nivolumab) or anti-PD-L1 (eg, atezolizumab) compared to anti-CTLA-4 (eg, ipilimumab) therapy (ROR: 3.9, 95%CI: 2.3–6.8).28 Suzuki et al found no cases of MG with ipilimumab.35

There was a shorter time to onset (median 29 days) for ICI-associated MG compared to other neurologic IRAEs (61–80 days).25 The median number of cycles prior to symptom onset amongst all cases was two cycles and ranged from three days after the first dose to three months after the sixth dose. The neuro-ophthalmic symptoms of MG included ptosis and diplopia. In comparison to idiopathic MG, ICI-associated MG patients were more likely to experience bulbar symptoms, specifically dysphagia, dysarthria, and dyspnea, as well as myasthenic crisis.35 ICI-associated MG was also more frequently associated with undetectable or lower acetylcholine receptor antibodies compared to idiopathic MG.28,97,98

ICI-associated MG overlapped with myositis (myalgia and/or elevated creatine kinase, CK) in 24 of 49 cases (49.0%). These results were lower than findings in larger studies—MG was associated with myositis in 85% and myocarditis in 8% of patients.28 There may be an underdiagnosis of concurrent myositis as many cases with elevated CK levels were not formally assessed. Few studies performed skeletal muscle biopsy, but five of seven tested patients had inflammatory infiltrates.28

ICI-associated MG presented with a more common life-threatening fulminant presentation than idiopathic MG.28 Myasthenic crisis had a weighted incidence of 35/78 (46.7%) in larger studies.28,35 In contrast, idiopathic MG has around 15% to 20% lifetime risk of myasthenic crisis in the literature.99 Median onset from presentation to respiratory failure requiring intubation was one week for ICI-associated MG.28

A wide spectrum of clinical severity existed for MG, however, aggressive treatment led to improvement of symptoms in 55.5% and complete remission in 18.9% of patients in larger studies.28,35 While corticosteroids are appropriate for MG, IVIg or PLEX used as a first-line therapy for patients presenting with severe respiratory or bulbar symptoms showed better MG outcomes compared to those who received steroids alone (95% vs 63% symptom improvement).28 However, none of those who had respiratory failure following first-line corticosteroids showed clinical improvement with secondary IVIg or PLEX, unlike patients with idiopathic MG.28

A fatality rate of 19.8% (70/354) was found in case reports and larger studies.25,28,35 Outcomes were worse in patients with concurrent myositis and/or myocarditis, with highest mortality in patients with both (5/8, 62.5%) compared with MG alone (29/179, 16.2%), or with myositis only (6/29; 20.7%).25,28 Overall, complete recovery of MG symptoms occurred in (28/123, 22.8%) of patients. Most patients were maintained on prolonged steroid tapers and showed improvement (63/123, 51.2%).

Orbital Disorders

ICIs were associated with both thyroid-like eye disease (TED)100108 (n=10) and idiopathic orbital myositis103,109119 (n=16). TED may develop in patients on ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or tremelimumab, even in the absence of existing thyroid dysfunction. In TED, patients generally presented with proptosis, chemosis, and thickening of extra-ocular muscles. They were associated with Graves' disease in 6/10 (60%) of case reports. Labs usually showed abnormal thyroid function, but up to 5% of patients with TED can be euthyroid or hypothyroid.107 Orbital myositis occurred in 15 patients, either from pembrolizumab or ipilimumab with or without nivolumab therapy. The median number of cycles prior to onset of symptoms for TED and myositis was three doses and ranged from one to 51 doses. In TED, orbital imaging showed thickening and enlargement of extraocular muscles without involvement of tendons, while in orbital myositis, tendons were involved. For TED, 9/10 patients (90%) showed improvement or resolution of TED with systemic corticosteroids, while one patient required canthotomy/cantholysis.100 Outcomes were worse for orbital myositis, with nine of 16 patients requiring additional therapy beyond systemic steroids (IVIg, methotrexate, PLEX, mycophenolate mofetil). Thirteen of 16 patients improved or experienced resolution, while two patients died from respiratory failure111,114 and one did not experience improvement before dying from unknown causes.116

In addition, one case each of orbital apex syndrome120 and Tolosa–Hunt syndrome22 occurred with ipilimumab. The former presented with painless vision loss, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia as a result of simultaneous dysfunction of the optic nerve and cranial nerves, and showed improvement on systemic steroids, albeit with persistent esotropia.120 The latter presented with severe unilateral periorbital pain and ophthalmoplegia, which improved with systemic steroids and local radiotherapy.22

Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA)

Five cases of GCA were reported following nivolumab, ipilimumab, combination of both, or pembrolizumab with one to 30 cycles of therapy.121125 Patients presented similar to idiopathic GCA with blurry vision, diplopia, transient vision loss, along with headache, scalp tenderness, and jaw claudication. One patient presented with sudden onset loss of vision alone, while another had no visual symptoms.124,125 Three of five cases also had polymyalgia rheumatica.121,123,124 Most cases resolved with discontinuation of ICI and high-dose corticosteroids between two and four days, while one case persisted with low-grade symptoms and worsened upon starting another ICI.124 No larger trials existed to evaluate incidence of ICI-associated GCA.

Other Neuro-ophthalmic Disorders

Eight cases of generalized myositis with ptosis were reported in literature, most commonly following pembrolizumab therapy (3/8, 37.5%).126133 A high rate of mortality was seen with general myositis (4/8, 50%). The remaining cases improved or resolved with corticosteroids alone or with IVIg. Other neuro-ophthalmic disorders included one case of oculomotor nerve palsy in 526 patients receiving nivolumab.24 This followed three cycles of nivolumab and resolved with a prednisone taper. Another study showed one case of bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia following nivolumab of 347 patients, which also improved with corticosteroids.38 One case of opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome was reported following ipilimumab and nivolumab therapy, which resolved with systemic corticosteroids and IVIg.134

Discussion

Neuro-ophthalmic complications may occur in patients being treated with ICIs. These include afferent disorders including optic neuritis, neuroretinitis, and GCA, and efferent disorders such as TED, MG, LEMS, orbital apex syndrome, oculomotor nerve palsy, orbital myositis, myositis with ptosis, Tolosa–Hunt Syndrome, and bilateral internuclear ophthalmoplegia. In general, ICIs may be held or discontinued for neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs, this decision should be made in consultation with the oncology team and appropriate guidelines, in particular, for more common IRAEs such as myasthenia gravis and myositis.13,135 Almost all patients require initial therapy with high-dose corticosteroids and may require other immunomodulatory therapy. Most afferent visual disorders (12/20, 60.0%) were treated with intravenous corticosteroids while others were treated orally. Out of all the afferent and efferent complications, four of 20 (20.0%) and 40 of 89 (44.9%), respectively, required additional immunomodulatory therapy, most commonly single therapy of IVIg. ICI re-challenge can be considered in cases of mild symptoms that resolve. In our review, 19 cases had either continued or held and then were re-challenged with ICI. Of these cases, four had recurrence or worsening of the same IRAE.84,106,124,136 In cases refractory to corticosteroids and recurrence of IRAE occurs to tapering of corticosteroids, IVIg and plasma exchange have been useful in the acute setting. Given the severity of symptoms and concern for new neuro-ophthalmic symptoms in patients with cancer, hospitalization is often necessary in patients with severe symptoms and multidisciplinary care involving oncology, ophthalmology, neurology, and neuro-ophthalmology is often required.

While ICIs are highly effective in stimulating the immune system to lead to a robust antitumor response, our study supports existing literature that ICIs have significant IRAEs that must be properly managed. In the literature, combination therapies have been discontinued more frequently than monotherapy.137 The mechanisms of induction of IRAEs is not fully elucidated, but are hypothesized to involve decreased peripheral tolerance and induction of organ-specific inflammatory processes.

In our review, several IRAEs occurred with a long duration after ICI administration and occurred with various doses and cycles of ICI. The earliest complication was TED, which arose after one dose (three days) of ipilimumab and pembrolizumab combination therapy,106 while the latest complication of orbital myositis arose after 51 doses (three years) of ipilimumab.115 Thus, the potential dose effects of ICIs on toxicity is difficult to determine at this time. There are key differences between neuro-ophthalmic and ophthalmic complications, our study found that neuro-ophthalmic ones were more likely to be associated with pembrolizumab, while ocular side effects were more common with ipilimumab in literature, likely due to differences in reporting adverse events between the two ICIs.14 In addition, the mean age of patients with neuro-ophthalmic complications was 66.5 years, higher than the mean age of 54 years for ophthalmic complications like uveitis.46 Ophthalmic complications generally had more favorable clinical outcomes compared to neuro-ophthalmic complications such as MG, which had a fatality rate of 19.8%.46

It is also unknown currently if neuro-ophthalmic IRAE severity can be used to predict treatment efficacy. An early study suggested that IRAE such as enterocolitis could signify response to treatment for metastatic melanoma;138 however, other studies have shown that occurrence of IRAE did not correlate with survival outcome or ICI treatment failure.139,140 Horvat et al also reported that the use of corticosteroids for IRAEs (primarily diarrhea, hepatitis, and dermatitis) did not impair overall survival in patients receiving ipilimumab for melanoma.140 This finding was supported by a recent systematic review of nine studies.141 There are currently a large number of novel ICIs, including two anti-CTLA-4, nine anti-PD-1, and four anti-PD-L1 currently in late-stage clinical studies for cancer indications.142

There are several limitations in this review. Data largely consisted of case series, which do not prove cause and effect between ICI and neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs. This link has not been firmly established, especially for conditions such as GCA where prevalence is higher in the patient demographics reported. We have reviewed each case to ensure that other common entities have been excluded in diagnostic consideration. Epidemiologic data on ICI complications were limited by the few number of studies that had neuro-ophthalmic complications. Some conditions may be under-reported due to nonspecific symptoms. While some diseases render a resemblance to established disorders, such as TED, it is possible that ICI-associated disorders (eg, inflammatory orbitopathy) is a distinct clinical syndrome. Future studies should aim to evaluate syndromes consistently (eg, tested for thyroid receptor antibody, thyroglobulin antibody, and thyroid peroxidase antibody). We have described misdiagnosis in previous reports of optic neuritis and emphasized the importance of proper investigations to confirm the diagnosis (eg, use of orbital MRI to detect optic nerve enhancement postgadolinium administration for optic neuritis, anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies for neuromyelitis optica).49 Efforts must be made to exclude common entities.

With the growing number of ICIs and increasing number of indications, it is important for neuro-ophthalmologists to be aware of potential adverse events. Future directions will include identifying minimum active doses for ICIs to achieve antitumor responses while minimizing IRAEs. The rapid identification and initiation of immunosuppression can improve patient outcomes. A collaborative approach and open communication with oncology is necessary in management of these IRAEs.

Funding Statement

There is no funding to report.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Sharma P, Wagner K, Wolchok JD, Allison JP. Novel cancer immunotherapy agents with survival benefit: recent successes and next steps. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:805–812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Garrett MD, Collins I. Anticancer therapy with checkpoint inhibitors: what, where and when? Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2011;32:308–316. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2011.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Buchbinder E, Stephen Hodi F. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and immune checkpoint blockade. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:3377–3383. doi: 10.1172/JCI80012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ohaegbulam KC, Assal A, Lazar-Molnar E, et al. Human cancer immunotherapy with antibodies to the PD-1 and PD-L1 pathway. Trends Mol Med. 2015;21:24–33. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.10.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Michot JM, Bigenwald C, Champiat S, et al. Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint blockade: a comprehensive review. Eur J Cancer. 2016;54:139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Spain L, Diem S, Larkin J. Management of toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016;44:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cousin S, Italiano A. Molecular pathways: immune checkpoint antibodies and their toxicities. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:4550–4555. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bertrand A, Kostine M, Barnetche T, et al. Immune related adverse events associated with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2015;13. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0455-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Puwanant A, Isfort M, Lacomis D, Živković SA. Clinical spectrum of neuromuscular complications after immune checkpoint inhibition. Neuromuscul Disord. 2019;29:127–133. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2018.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Antoun J, Titah C, Cochereau I. Ocular and orbital side-effects of checkpoint inhibitors: a review article. Curr Opin Oncol. 2016;28:288–294. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Noble CW, Gangaputra SS, Thompson IA, et al. Ocular adverse events following use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for metastatic malignancies. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2020;28(6):854–859. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1583347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cunningham ET, Moorthy RS, Zierhut M. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2020;28:847–849. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2020.1801286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1714–1768. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dalvin LA, Shields CL, Orloff M, et al. Checkpoint inhibitor immune therapy. Retina. 2018;38:1063–1078. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pan PCW, Haggiagi A. Neurologic immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibition. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019;21. doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0859-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Möhn N, Beutel G, Gutzmer R, et al. Neurological immune related adverse events associated with nivolumab, ipilimumab, and pembrolizumab therapy—review of the literature and future outlook. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1777. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haugh AM, Probasco JC, Johnson DB. Neurologic complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2020;19:479–488. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1738382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Higgins JPT GS, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Cochrane Collab; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700–b2700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. 2019. Available from: www.covidence.org. Accessed September27, 2020.
  • 21.Camacho LH, Antonia S, Sosman J, et al. Phase I/II trial of tremelimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1075–1081. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.2435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Voskens CJ, Goldinger SM, Loquai C, et al. The price of tumor control: an analysis of rare side effects of anti-CTLA-4 therapy in metastatic melanoma from the ipilimumab network. PLoS One. 2013;8:e53745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kaur A, Doberstein T, Amberker RR, et al. Immune-related adverse events in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a single-center experience. Med. 2019;98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mancone S, Lycan T, Ahmed T, et al. Severe neurologic complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a single-center review. J Neurol. 2018;265:1636–1642. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8890-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Johnson DB, Manouchehri A, Haugh AM, et al. Neurologic toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance study. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:134. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0617-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kim JM, Materin MA, Sznol M, et al. Ophthalmic immune-related adverse events of immunotherapy: a single-site case series. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:1058–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Moreira A, Loquai C, Pföhler C, et al. Myositis and neuromuscular side-effects induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Eur J Cancer. 2019;106:12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Safa H, Johnson DH, Trinh VA, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor related myasthenia gravis: single center experience and systematic review of the literature. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:319. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0774-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Seki M, Uruha A, Ohnuki Y, et al. Inflammatory myopathy associated with PD-1 inhibitors. J Autoimmun. 2019;100:105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Williams KJ, Grauer DW, Henry DW, Rockey ML. Corticosteroids for the management of immune-related adverse events in patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019;25:544–550. doi: 10.1177/1078155217744872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Weber JS, Kudchadkar RR, Yu B, et al. Safety, efficacy, and biomarkers of nivolumab with vaccine in ipilimumab-refractory or -naive melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4311–4318. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.4802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hodi FS, Lawrence D, Lezcano C, et al. Bevacizumab plus ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:632–642. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Balar AV, Castellano D, O’Donnell PH, et al. First-line pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial cancer (KEYNOTE-052): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1483–1492. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30616-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Diehl A, Yarchoan M, Hopkins A, et al. Relationships between lymphocyte counts and treatmentrelated toxicities and clinical responses in patients with solid tumors treated with PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. Oncotarget. 2017;8:114268–114280. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Suzuki S, Ishikawa N, Konoeda F, et al. Nivolumab-related myasthenia gravis with myositis and myocarditis in Japan. Neurology. 2017;89:1127–1134. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Omuro A, Vlahovic G, Lim M, et al. Nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: results from exploratory Phase I cohorts of CheckMate 143. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20:674–686. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Touat M, Maisonobe T, Knauss S, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myositis and myocarditis in patients with cancer. Neurology. 2018;91:e985–e994. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kao JC, Liao B, Markovic SN, et al. Neurological complications associated with anti–programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:1216–1222. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.1912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boisseau W, Touat M, Berzero G, et al. Safety of treatment with nivolumab after ipilimumab-related meningoradiculitis and bilateral optic neuropathy. Eur J Cancer. 2017;83:28–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Francis JH, Jaben K, Santomasso BD, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor associated optic neuritis. Ophthalmology. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yeh OL, Francis CE. Ipilimumab-associated bilateral optic neuropathy. J Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2015;35:144–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kartal Ö, Ataş E. Bilateral optic neuritis secondary to nivolumab therapy: a case report. Med. 2018;54:82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mori S, Kurimoto T, Ueda K, et al. Optic neuritis possibly induced by anti-PD-L1 antibody treatment in a patient with non-small cell lung carcinoma. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2018;9:348–356. doi: 10.1159/000491075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Samanci NS, Ozan T, Çelik E, Demirelli FH. Optic neuritis related to atezolizumab treatment in a patient with metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16:96–98. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sun J, Schiffman J, Raghunath A, et al. Concurrent decrease in IL-10 with development of immune-related adverse events in a patient treated with anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Cancer Immun. 2008;8:9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sun MM, Levinson RD, Filipowicz A, et al. Uveitis in patients treated with CTLA-4 and PD-1 checkpoint blockade inhibition. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2020;28:217–227. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1577978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wilson MA, Guld K, Galetta S, et al. Acute visual loss after ipilimumab treatment for metastatic melanoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2016;4. doi: 10.1186/s40425-016-0170-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hahn L, Pepple KL. Bilateral neuroretinitis and anterior uveitis following ipilimumab treatment for metastatic melanoma. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2016;6. doi: 10.1186/s12348-016-0082-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Micieli JA, Margolin E. Re: Francis et al.: immune checkpoint inhibitor associated optic neuritis (Ophthalmology. 2020 May 8 [Epub ahead of print]). Ophthalmology. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.05.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nakatani Y, Tanaka N, Enami T, et al. Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic syndrome caused by Nivolumab in a patient with squamous cell lung cancer. Case Rep Neurol. 2018;10:346–352. doi: 10.1159/000494078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Algaeed M, Mukharesh L, Heinzelmann M, Kaminski HJ. Pearls & Oy-sters: pembrolizumab-induced myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2018;91:E1365–E1367. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Alnahhas I, Wong J. A case of new-onset antibody-positive myasthenia gravis in a patient treated with pembrolizumab for melanoma. Muscle Nerve. 2017;55:E25–E26. doi: 10.1002/mus.25496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fazel M, Jedlowski PM. Severe myositis, myocarditis, and myasthenia gravis with elevated anti-striated muscle antibody following single dose of ipilimumab-nivolumab therapy in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Case Reports Immunol. 2019;2019:1–3. doi: 10.1155/2019/2539493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fellner A, Makranz C, Lotem M, et al. Neurologic complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Neurooncol. 2018;137:601–609. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2752-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fukasawa Y, Sasaki K, Natsume M, et al. Nivolumab-induced myocarditis concomitant with myasthenia gravis. Case Rep Oncol. 2017;10:809–812. doi: 10.1159/000479958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gonzalez NL, Puwanant A, Lu A, et al. Myasthenia triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors: new case and literature review. Neuromuscul Disord. 2017;27:266–268. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hasegawa Y, Kawai S, Ota T, et al. Myasthenia gravis induced by nivolumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a case report and literature review. Immunotherapy. 2017;9:701–707. doi: 10.2217/imt-2017-0043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hibino M, Maeda K, Horiuchi S, et al. Pembrolizumab-induced myasthenia gravis with myositis in a patient with lung cancer. Respirol Case Reports. 2018;6:e00355. doi: 10.1002/rcr2.355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Huh SY, Shin SH, Kim MK, et al. Emergence of myasthenia gravis with myositis in a patient treated with pembrolizumab for thymic cancer. J Clin Neurol. 2018;14:115–117. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2018.14.1.115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Johnson DB, Saranga-Perry V, Lavin PJM, et al. Myasthenia gravis induced by ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:e122–e124. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.1683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kim JS, Nam TS, Kim J, et al. Myasthenia gravis and myopathy after nivolumab treatment for non-small cell lung carcinoma: a case report. Thorac Cancer. 2019;10:2045–2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Konstantina T, Konstantinos R, Anastasios K, et al. Fatal adverse events in two thymoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 immune check point inhibitor and literature review. Lung Cancer. 2019;135:29–32. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.06.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Becquart O, Lacotte J, Malissart P, et al. Myasthenia gravis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother. 2019;42:309–312. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lara MS, Afify A, Ellis MP, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myasthenia gravis in a patient with advanced NSCLC and remote history of thymoma. Clin Lung Cancer. 2019;20:e489–e491. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lau KHV, Kumar A, Yang IH, Nowak RJ. Exacerbation of myasthenia gravis in a patient with melanoma treated with pembrolizumab. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54:157–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Liao B, Shroff S, Kamiya-Matsuoka C, Tummala S. Atypical neurological complications of ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16:589–593. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Liu Q, Ayyappan S, Broad A, Narita A. Pembrolizumab-associated ocular myasthenia gravis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2019;47:ceo.13499. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Loochtan AI, Nickolich MS, Hobson-Webb LD. Myasthenia gravis associated with ipilimumab and nivolumab in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Muscle Nerve. 2015;52:307–308. doi: 10.1002/mus.24648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Maeda O, Yokota K, Atsuta N, et al. Nivolumab for the treatment of malignant melanoma in a patient with pre-existing myasthenia gravis. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2016;78:119–122. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mancano MA, Von BJE, Ro M. ISMP adverse drug reactions: lithium-induced cardiomyopathy fixed drug eruption due to cetirizine, levocetirizine, and hydroxyzine nivolumab-induced myasthenia gravis nivolumab-induced cholangitic liver disease torsade de pointes caused by psychiatric polypharmacy trichotillomania associated with aripiprazole. Hosp Pharm. 2018;53:371–375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.March KL, Samarin MJ, Sodhi A, Owens RE. Pembrolizumab-induced myasthenia gravis: a fatal case report. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2018;24:146–149. doi: 10.1177/1078155216687389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mitsune A, Yanagisawa S, Fukuhara T, et al. Relapsed myasthenia gravis after nivolumab treatment. Intern Med. 2018;57:1893–1897. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9153-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Möhn N, Sühs KW, Gingele S, et al. Acute progressive neuropathy-myositis-myasthenia-like syndrome associated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2019;29:435–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chang E, Sabichi AL, Sada YH. Myasthenia gravis after nivolumab therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Immunother. 2017;40:114–116. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Montes V, Sousa S, Pita F, et al. Myasthenia gravis induced by ipilimumab in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Front Neurol. 2018;9:150. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Nguyen BHV, Kuo J, Budiman A, et al. Two cases of clinical myasthenia gravis associated with pembrolizumab use in responding melanoma patients. Melanoma Res. 2017;27:152–154. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Onda A, Miyagawa S, Takahashi N, et al. Pembrolizumab-induced ocular Myasthenia Gravis with anti-titin antibody and necrotizing myopathy. Intern Med. 2019;58:1635–1638. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1956-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Phua CS, Murad A, Fraser C, et al. Myasthenia gravis and concurrent myositis following PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor for non-small cell lung cancer. BMJ Neurol Open. 2020;2:e000028. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2019-000028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Polat P, Donofrio PD. Myasthenia gravis induced by nivolumab therapy in a patient with non–small-cell lung cancer. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54:507. doi: 10.1002/mus.25163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Sciacca G, Nicoletti A, Rampello L, et al. Benign form of myasthenia gravis after nivolumab treatment. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54:507–509. doi: 10.1002/mus.25212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.So H, Ikeguchi R, Kobayashi M, et al. PD-1 inhibitor-associated severe myasthenia gravis with necrotizing myopathy and myocarditis. J Neurol Sci. 2019;399:97–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Takai M, Kato D, Iinuma K, et al. Simultaneous pembrolizumab-induced myasthenia gravis and myocarditis in a patient with metastatic bladder cancer: a case report. Urol Case Reports. 2020;31:101145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tan RYC, Toh CK, Takano A. Continued response to one dose of nivolumab complicated by myasthenic crisis and myositis. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:e90–e91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.02.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Tedbirt B, De Pontville M, Branger P, et al. Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitor after pembrolizumab-induced myasthenia gravis. Eur J Cancer. 2019;113:72–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Chen JH, Lee KY, Hu CJ, Chung CC. Coexisting myasthenia gravis, myositis, and polyneuropathy induced by ipilimumab and nivolumab in a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer: a case report and literature review. Med. 2017;96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Thakolwiboon S, Karukote A, Wilms H. De novo myasthenia gravis induced by atezolizumab in a patient with urothelial carcinoma. Ann Neurol. 2019;86:S109–S110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Tozuka T, Sugano T, Noro R, et al. Pembrolizumab-induced agranulocytosis in a pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma patient who developed interstitial lung disease and ocular myasthenia gravis. Oxford Med Case Reports. 2018;11:398–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Veccia A, Kinspergher S, Grego E, et al. Myositis and myasthenia during nivolumab administration for advanced lung cancer: a case report and review of the literature. Anticancer Drugs. 2020;31:540–544. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Werner J-M, Schweinsberg V, Schroeter M, et al. Successful treatment of myasthenia gravis following PD-1/CTLA-4 combination checkpoint blockade in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Front Oncol. 2019;9:84. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Xing Q, Zhang Z-W, Lin Q-H, et al. Myositis-myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome complicated with myasthenia crisis and myocarditis associated with anti-programmed cell death-1 (sintilimab) therapy for lung adenocarcinoma. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:250. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Wilson R, Menassa DA, Davies AJ, et al. Seronegative antibody-mediated neurology after immune checkpoint inhibitors. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018;5:640–645. doi: 10.1002/acn3.547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chen YH, Liu FC, Hsu CH, Chian CF. Nivolumab-induced myasthenia gravis in a patient with squamous cell lung carcinoma. Med. 2017;96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Cooper DS, Meriggioli MN, Bonomi PD, Malik R. Severe exacerbation of myasthenia gravis associated with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2017;4:169–173. doi: 10.3233/JND-170219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Crusz SM, Radunovic A, Shepherd S, et al. Rituximab in the treatment of pembrolizumab-induced myasthenia gravis. Eur J Cancer. 2018;102:49–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Dhenin A, Samartzi V, Lejeune S, Seront E. Cascade of immunologic adverse events related to pembrolizumab treatment. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12:e229149. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-229149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Earl DE, Loochtan AI, Bedlack RS. Refractory myasthenia gravis exacerbation triggered by pembrolizumab. Muscle Nerve. 2018;57:E120–E121. doi: 10.1002/mus.26021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kolb NA, Trevino CR, Waheed W, et al. Neuromuscular complications of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Muscle Nerve. 2018;58:10–22. doi: 10.1002/mus.26070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Psimaras D, Velasco R, Birzu C, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced neuromuscular toxicity: from pathogenesis to treatment. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2019;24:S74–S85. doi: 10.1111/jns.12339 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Wendell LC, Levine JM. Myasthenic crisis. Neurohospitalist. 2011;1:16–22. doi: 10.1177/1941875210382918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Borodic G, Hinkle DM, Cia Y. Drug-induced graves disease from CTLA-4 receptor suppression. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27:e87–e88. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181ef72a1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Campredon P, Imbert P, Mouly C, et al. Severe inflammatory ophthalmopathy in a euthyroid patient during nivolumab treatment. Eur Thyroid J. 2018;7:84–87. doi: 10.1159/000485742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ricciuti B, Metro G, Baglivo S, et al. Long-lasting response to nivolumab and immune-related adverse events in a nonsquamous metastatic non–small cell lung cancer patient. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:e51–e55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sagiv O, Kandl TJ, Thakar SD, et al. Extraocular muscle enlargement and thyroid eye disease-like orbital inflammation associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in cancer patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;35:50–52. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.McElnea E, Á NM, Moran S, et al. Thyroid-like ophthalmopathy in a euthyroid patient receiving Ipilimumab. Orbit. 2014;33:424–427. doi: 10.3109/01676830.2014.949792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Min L, Vaidya A, Becker C. Thyroid autoimmunity and ophthalmopathy related to melanoma biological therapy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164:303–307. doi: 10.1530/EJE-10-0833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Rhea L, Yoon JW, Jang S. Rapid development of Graves’ ophthalmopathy after treatment with ipilimumab and recurrence with pembrolizumab in a patient with previously treated Graves’ disease. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14:747–749. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Park ESY, Rabinowits G, Hamnvik OPR, Dagi LR. A case of Graves’ ophthalmopathy associated with pembrolizumab (Keytruda) therapy. J AAPOS. 2018;22:310–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2018.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Sabini E, Sframeli A, Marinò M. A case of drug-induced Graves’ Orbitopathy after combination therapy with Tremelimumab and Durvalumab. J Endocrinol Invest. 2018;41:877–878. doi: 10.1007/s40618-018-0906-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Bitton K, Michot JM, Barreau E, et al. Prevalence and Clinical patterns of ocular complications associated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 anticancer immunotherapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;202:109–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Patel D, Tremont A, Fuloria J. Orbital myositis secondary to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibody – a case report. Clin Oncol. 2016;1:1149. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Haddox CL, Shenoy N, Shah KK, et al. Pembrolizumab induced bulbar myopathy and respiratory failure with necrotizing myositis of the diaphragm. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:673–675. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Henderson AD, Thomas DA. A case report of orbital inflammatory syndrome secondary to ipilimumab. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;31:e68–e70. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kamo H, Hatano T, Kanai K, et al. Pembrolizumab-related systemic myositis involving ocular and hindneck muscles resembling myasthenic gravis: A case report. BMC Neurol. 2019;19:184. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1416-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Liewluck T, Kao JC, Mauermann ML. PD-1 inhibitor-associated myopathies: emerging immune-mediated myopathies. J Immunother. 2018;41:208–211. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Nardin C, Borot S, Beaudoin MA, et al. Long-term adverse event: inflammatory orbitopathy induced by pembrolizumab in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Invest New Drugs. 2019;37:375–377. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0659-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Nasr F, El Rassy E, Maalouf G, et al. Severe ophthalmoplegia and myocarditis following the administration of pembrolizumab. Eur J Cancer. 2018;91:171–173. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Pushkarevskaya A, Neuberger U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, et al. Severe ocular myositis after ipilimumab treatment for melanoma: a report of 2 cases. J Immunother. 2017;40:282–285. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Valenti-Azcarate R, Esparragosa Vazquez I, Toledano Illan C, et al. Nivolumab and Ipilimumab-induced myositis and myocarditis mimicking a myasthenia gravis presentation. Neuromuscul Disord. 2020;30:67–69. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2019.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Williams KJ, Allen R. Immune checkpoint inhibitor–induced ptosis in a patient with prostate cancer. J Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2020. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Hassanzadeh B, DeSanto J, Kattah JC. Ipilimumab-induced adenohypophysitis and orbital apex syndrome: importance of early diagnosis and management. Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2018;42:176–181. doi: 10.1080/01658107.2017.1368090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Betrains A, Blockmans DE. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis occurring in a patient after treatment with nivolumab. J Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Feb 19 [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Chow KL, Perju-Dumbrava L, Malhotra A, et al. Giant cell arteritis secondary to combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in metastatic pleural mesothelioma. Neurol Asia. 2020;25. [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Goldstein BL, Gedmintas L, Todd DJ. Drug-associated polymyalgia rheumatica/giant cell arteritis occurring in two patients after treatment with ipilimumab, an antagonist of CTLA-4. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:768–769. doi: 10.1002/art.38282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Hid Cadena R, Abdulahad WH, Hospers GAP, et al. Checks and balances in autoimmune vasculitis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:315. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Micaily I, Chernoff M. An unknown reaction to pembrolizumab: giant cell arteritis. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:2621–2622. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Bourgeois-Vionnet J, Joubert B, Bernard E, et al. Nivolumab-induced myositis: a case report and a literature review. J Neurol Sci. 2018;387:51–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.01.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Hellman JB, Traynis I, Lin LK. Pembrolizumab and epacadostat induced fatal myocarditis and myositis presenting as a case of ptosis and ophthalmoplegia. Orbit. 2019;38:244–247. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2018.1490439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Hamada S, Fuseya Y, Tsukino M. Pembrolizumab-induced rhabdomyolysis with myositis in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma. Arch Bronconeumol. 2018;54:346–348. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2018.01.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Diamantopoulos PT, Tsatsou K, Benopoulou O, et al. Inflammatory myopathy and axonal neuropathy in a patient with melanoma following pembrolizumab treatment. J Immunother. 2017;40:221–223. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Alnabulsi R, Hussain A, DeAngelis D. Complete ophthalmoplegia in Ipilmumab and Nivolumab combination treatment for metastatic melanoma. Orbit. 2018;37:381–384. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2017.1423349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Carrera W, Baartman BJ, Kosmorsky G. A case report of drug-induced myopathy involving extraocular muscles after combination therapy with tremelimumab and durvalumab for non-small cell lung cancer. Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2017;41:140–143. doi: 10.1080/01658107.2017.1291686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Khoo A, Zhuang YZ, Boundy K, Frasca J. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myositis associated with atezolizumab therapy. Neurol Clin Pract. 2019;9:E25–E26. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Kang KH, Grubb W, Sawlani K, et al. Immune checkpoint-mediated myositis and myasthenia gravis: a case report and review of evaluation and management. Am J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Med Surg. 2018;39:642–645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Maller B, Peguero E, Tanvetyanon T. Ipilimumab/nivolumab-related opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome variant in a patient with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Immunother. 2018;41:411–412. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the society for immunotherapy of cancer (SITC) toxicity management working group. J Immunother Cancer. 2017;5:95. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0300-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Fazel M, Jedlowski PM. Severe myositis, myocarditis, and myasthenia gravis with elevated anti-striated muscle antibody following single dose of ipilimumab-nivolumab therapy in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Case Reports Immunol. 2019;2019:1–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:23–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Beck KE, Blansfield JA, Tran KQ, et al. Enterocolitis in patients with cancer after antibody blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2283–2289. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Ascierto PA, Simeone E, Sileni VC, et al. Clinical experience with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg: real-world efficacy and safety data from an expanded access programme cohort. J Transl Med. 2014;12:116. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Horvat TZ, Adel NG, Dang TO, et al. Immune-related adverse events, need for systemic immunosuppression, and effects on survival and time to treatment failure in patients with melanoma treated with ipilimumab at memorial sloan kettering cancer center. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3193–3198. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Petrelli F, Signorelli D, Ghidini M, et al. Association of steroids use with survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers. 2020;12:546. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Kaplon H, Muralidharan M, Schneider Z, Reichert JM. Antibodies to watch in 2020. MAbs. 2020;12:1703531. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2019.1703531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Eye and Brain are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES