Abstract
Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Proteins (FPOP) is a powerful covalent labeling tool that uses hydroxyl radicals generated by laser flash photolysis of hydrogen peroxide to footprint protein surfaces. Because radical production varies with many experimental parameters, hydroxyl radical dosimeters have been introduced to track the effective radical dosage experienced by the protein analyte. FPOP experiments performed using adenine optical radical dosimetry containing protein in Tris buffer demonstrated unusual dosimetry behavior. We have investigated the behavior of Tris under oxidative conditions in detail. We find that Tris can act as a novel gain-of-signal optical hydroxyl radical dosimeter in FPOP experiments. This new dosimeter is also amenable to inline real-time monitoring thereby allowing real-time adjustments to compensate for differences in samples for their quenching ability.
Introduction:
Since its introduction by Hambly and Gross [1], Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Proteins (FPOP) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS)-based bottom-up proteomic methods has become a powerful technique for characterizing protein topography. FPOP relies on characterizing protein topography by measuring the apparent rate of reaction of amino acid side chains with diffuse hydroxyl radicals generated by laser flash photolysis of hydrogen peroxide. The apparent oxidation rate of each amino acid is dependent on both its inherent reactivity (which in turn is dependent on the sequence context [2, 3] and side chain structure [4]) and the radical accessibility of the side chain [3, 5–7]. These labeling reactions produce covalently bound, stable modification products which are unaffected by downstream sample-handling [8–10], and, though it currently provides lower resolution than other structural biology techniques such as X-ray crystallography, NMR, and cryo-EM, FPOP benefits from a low sample-size requirement, tremendous flexibility in sample characteristics (homogeneity, size, dynamics, etc.), and the ability to complete initial protein-radical chemistry on a low microsecond timescale that is faster than conformational changes can occur [1, 8, 9], although secondary reactions can persist longer [11, 12].
Structural characterization by FPOP typically depends on comparing protein footprints obtained under several conditions. However, alterations to hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity due to changes in buffer composition or the addition of some ligands and/or binding partners make it difficult to standardize results for comparison between experiments and between labs. To overcome this issue, several molecules have been introduced to the FPOP workflow which allow the effective hydroxyl radical concentration experienced by the analyte to be determined, thereby providing a metric with which experiments can be compared [13–16]. Each of these dosimeters competes with the analyte for hydroxyl radicals and experiences a change in its measurable properties proportional to the amount of radical present and not scavenged by other pathways.
The UV-absorbent molecule adenine offers an easy option for radical dosimetry [15, 17], and although it initially necessitated the introduction of additional steps to the FPOP workflow, the recent introduction of an inline UV-spectrometer [10] negates this issue and allows hydroxyl radical production to be monitored in real-time. Adjustments to peroxide concentration, laser fluence, and scavenging capacity can then be made as an experiment is performed to maintain a consistent level of oxidation across all samples [18].
Recently, while performing FPOP experiments in Tris buffer with the adenine dosimeter, we observed adenine dosimetry readings that were inconsistent with protein oxidation and exhibited unexpected gain of absorbance behavior. We investigated the properties of Tris under oxidative conditions and found that Tris acted as an effective intrinsic buffer/dosimeter that allows for optical hydroxyl radical dosimetry without the need to add an exogenous molecule; the buffer itself provides the hydroxyl radical dosimeter.
Material and Methods:
Tris, myoglobin, Glu1-fibrinopeptide B (GluB), and MES hydrate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO, USA). Hydrogen peroxide (30%) was purchased from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA), and sequencing grade-modified trypsin was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). Methionine amide was purchased from Bachem (Torrance, CA, USA). Dithiothreitol (DTT) was purchased from Soltec Ventures (Beverly, MA, USA). LC/MS-grade formic acid and LC/MS-grade acetonitrile were purchased from Fisher chemical (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA). 8.5 mM Tris was used in all experiments in order to maintain a hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity comparable to the 1 mM adenine and 17 mM glutamine used in many FPOP experiments [1, 9, 19]. All oxidation was performed by exposure to the pulsed beam of a COMPex Pro 102 KrF excimer laser (Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, CA) using standard FPOP methods described previously [1]. For offline dosimetry, ultraviolet absorbance was measured on a Thermo NanoDrop 2000c UV spectrophotometer. For real-time inline dosimetry, a Pioneer Series inline dosimeter (GenNext Technologies, Montara, CA) was used [10]. All samples were deposited after FPOP directly into a quench solution containing 0.5 μg/μL catalase and 0.5 μg/μL methionine amide to reduce secondary oxidation products.
Oxidized GluB and myoglobin samples were denatured by incubation at 90°C for 15 minutes, and digested by adding 1:20 w/w sequencing grade modified trypsin and incubating with rotation at 37 °C overnight. Digestion was stopped by adding 0.1% formic acid, and samples were analyzed by LC-MS/MS on an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Myoglobin peptide separation was performed on an Acclaim PepMap 100 C18 nanocolumn (0.75 mm × 150 mm, 2 μm, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Peptides were eluted using a binary gradient of water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (B) by increasing an initial 2% B gradient to 35% B over 22 minutes, ramping to 95% B over 5 minutes, holding for 3 minutes, returning to 2% B over 3 minutes, and finally holding at 2% B for 9 minutes. Electrospray voltage was set to 2500 V, and the ion transfer tube temperature was 300 °C. The top eight peaks from MS1 were fragmented by CID. Oxidation events per peptide were calculated using methods previously described [10].
Results and Discussion:
In order to investigate the behavior of Tris buffer under oxidative conditions, quadruplicate samples of Tris were reacted with hydroxyl radicals produced from the photolysis of hydrogen peroxide with an excimer laser. Upon comparing the UV absorbance spectra of Tris (obtained with a NanoDrop spectrometer) both with and without laser irradiation, we observed that, while Tris buffer is inherently absorbent in the short wavelength region of the ultraviolet spectrum, this absorbance changes little after oxidation by FPOP. In contrast, unoxidized Tris buffer was seen to be minimally absorbing in the longer wavelength UV region from 250–310 nm, but oxidation caused a substantial absorbance increase in this region with a maximum at 265 nm (Figure S1, Supplementary Information). In order to determine the source of Tris absorbance behavior, quadruplicate samples were oxidized under four different conditions as shown in Figure 1. As expected, all samples maintained a basal level of absorbance at 265 nm, but the absorbance significantly increased upon exposure to hydroxyl radicals. Based on these observations, we hypothesized that Tris buffer could be used as a hydroxyl radical dosimeter in FPOP reactions. Any such dosimeter must be capable of measuring the effective hydroxyl radical dose experienced by the protein analyte under diverse conditions. We performed FPOP on quadruplicate samples containing Tris and the model peptide GluB to evaluate the correlation between Tris absorbance and peptide oxidation. Laser fluence was held at 10.23 mJ/mm2 for all samples, and the concentration of hydrogen peroxide was varied from 5–40 mM in increments of 5 mM to generate increasing concentrations of radical. Because an increase in radical concentration corresponds to increased oxidation of analytes, we expected to see a direct, positive correlation between Tris absorbance and GluB oxidation. Figure 2 shows that the absorbance of Tris at 265 nm does strongly positively correlate to average GluB oxidation per peptide, with deviations most likely dominated by error in the measurement of GluB oxidation [20].
Figure 1.

Absorbance of Tris at 265 nm as measured by NanoDrop after exposure to four sample conditions. Absorbance increases significantly only upon reaction with hydroxyl radicals generated by flash photolysis of hydrogen peroxide.
Figure 2.

Tris absorbance at 265 nm correlates positively with average oxidation of GluB peptide.
We also observed that the gain in Tris absorbance was less when a competing radical scavenger, MES buffer, was added in the solution (Figure S2, Supplementary Information). Both of these observations support the hypothesis that Tris could be used as a potential dosimeter. However, it is important to note that both experiments used a simple sample mixture containing only Tris and one additional component. In most FPOP experiments, the sample contains several additional analytes, which compete with the dosimeter for radicals, so it is important to see that Tris maintains its dosimetry abilities under such complex conditions.
In order to test the robustness of Tris acting as a radical dosimeter, a standard FPOP reaction containing myoglobin was carried out with buffer pH held at 8.0 to maintain myoglobin conformational stability. The reaction mixture was oxidized in the presence as well as the absence of MES buffer, and absorbance readings were obtained in real-time using inline dosimeter monitoring. First, myoglobin was oxidized and the ΔAbs265 readings were 4.97±0.15 absorbance units, at a laser fluence of 11.66 mJ/mm2. In the presence of 10 mM MES buffer, the ΔAbs265 decreased to 3.37±0.30 absorbance units at 11.66 mJ/mm2, reflecting scavenging by the MES buffer. In a separate experiment, laser fluence was increased to 15.30 mJ/mm2 during the exposure of the myoglobin+MES sample to achieve a ΔAbs265 reading ≈ 4.97, identical to that of myoglobin without MES buffer (Figure 3A). When FPOP is performed in the Tris buffer alone, the peptides are more oxidized; when MES is also added to the mixture, a drop in the oxidation of all myoglobin peptides is observed. By compensating for the scavenging capacity of MES buffer using Tris as a dosimeter, the compensated oxidation of all myoglobin peptides in the presence of MES buffer is the same as in the samples without MES scavenger as shown in Figure 3B, demonstrating that Tris can act as a functional and practical radical dosimeter for scavenging compensation [18].
Figure 3.

A) Tris absorbance change for myoglobin samples without MES scavenger, with 10 mM MES scavenger, and compensated conditions with 10 mM MES scavenger and increased laser fluence to obtain a ΔAbs265 ≈ 4.97. B) (Blue) Peptide oxidation for myoglobin peptides in the absence of MES; (Orange) Peptide oxidation for myoglobin peptides in the presence of 10 mM MES; (Grey) Peptide oxidation for myoglobin in the presence of 10 mM MES under compensating laser fluence conditions, using Tris as a doseimeter for radical compensation. No statistically significant differences were detected in peptide oxidation between no MES samples and with MES-containing samples compensated using Tris dosimetry.
Conclusion:
We have shown that the common buffer Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane can be used as a highly effective hydroxyl radical dosimeter for FPOP experiments. Increases in Tris absorbance correlate strongly with peptide oxidation (R2 = 0.827) and scavenging capacity (R2 = 0.9625), and the absorbance loss resulting from increased scavenging capacity can be compensated in real-time to maintain consistent protein footprints. We suspect that this new chromophore is the result of formation of a gem-diol followed by water elimination, resulting in aldehyde and/or imine formation [21, 22], with a proposed scheme as shown in Figure S3, Supplementary Information.
Several characteristics of Tris suggest that it may be a favorable replacement for adenine dosimeter in many FPOP applications. Because the molecule is UV-active in the same range as adenine, no modifications to current measurement technologies are required for its adoption. As shown in Figure S4, Tris is the major contributor to absorbance change after laser exposure, so there is little interference from proteins or other buffer components. Tris also eliminates the need for the background scavenger glutamine thereby simplifying sample preparation. Furthermore, the use of Tris instead of adenine will allow for the application of FPOP to nucleoside and nucleotide binding proteins (a very large category of proteins) without concern about dosimeter interference in protein structure.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments:
This work was funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM127267 and R43GM125420). We would like to thank Dr. Gerald B. Rowland and Dr. Daniell L. Mattern for many valuable discussions about possible reaction schemes resulting in Tris oxidation product absorbance behavior.
Footnotes
Financial Conflict of Interest Disclosure
J.S.S. and S.R.W. disclose a significant financial interest in GenNext Technologies, Inc., an early-stage company seeking to commercialize technologies for protein higher-order structure analysis. This manuscript and all data were reviewed by S.K.M., who has no financial conflict of interest, in accordance with the University of Mississippi FCOI management practices.
References:
- 1.Hambly DM, Gross ML Laser flash photolysis of hydrogen peroxide to oxidize protein solvent-accessible residues on the microsecond timescale. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 16(12), 2057–2063 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sharp JS, Tomer KB Effects of anion proximity in peptide primary sequence on the rate and mechanism of leucine oxidation. Anal Chem. 78(14), 4885–4893 (2006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xie B, Sood A, Woods RJ, Sharp JS Quantitative Protein Topography Measurements by High Resolution Hydroxyl Radical Protein Footprinting Enable Accurate Molecular Model Selection. Sci Rep. 7(1), 4552 (2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Xu G, Chance MR Radiolytic modification and reactivity of amino acid residues serving as structural probes for protein footprinting. Anal Chem. 77(14), 4549–4555 (2005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kaur P, Kiselar J, Yang S, Chance MR Quantitative protein topography analysis and high-resolution structure prediction using hydroxyl radical labeling and tandem-ion mass spectrometry (MS). Mol Cell Proteomics. 14(4), 1159–1168 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang W, Ravikumar KM, Chance MR, Yang S Quantitative mapping of protein structure by hydroxyl radical footprinting-mediated structural mass spectrometry: a protection factor analysis. Biophys J. 108(1), 107–115 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chance MR Unfolding of apomyoglobin examined by synchrotron footprinting. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 287(3), 614–621 (2001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li KS, Shi L, Gross ML Mass Spectrometry-Based Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Proteins (FPOP) for Higher Order Structure Characterization. Acc Chem Res. 51(3), 736–744 (2018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gau BC, Sharp JS, Rempel DL, Gross ML Fast photochemical oxidation of protein footprints faster than protein unfolding. Anal Chem. 81(16), 6563–6571 (2009) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sharp JS, Misra SK, Persoff JJ, Egan RW, Weinberger SR Real Time Normalization of Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Proteins Experiments by Inline Adenine Radical Dosimetry. Anal Chem. 90(21), 12625–12630 (2018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Watson C, Janik I, Zhuang T, Charvatova O, Woods RJ, Sharp JS Pulsed electron beam water radiolysis for submicrosecond hydroxyl radical protein footprinting. Anal Chem. 81(7), 2496–2505 (2009) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vahidi S, Konermann L Probing the Time Scale of FPOP (Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Proteins): Radical Reactions Extend Over Tens of Milliseconds. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 27(7), 1156–1164 (2016) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Niu B, Zhang H, Giblin D, Rempel DL, Gross ML Dosimetry determines the initial OH radical concentration in fast photochemical oxidation of proteins (FPOP). J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 26(5), 843–846 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li Z, Moniz H, Wang S, Ramiah A, Zhang F, Moremen KW, Linhardt RJ, Sharp JS High structural resolution hydroxyl radical protein footprinting reveals an extended Robo1-heparin binding interface. J Biol Chem. 290(17), 10729–10740 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xie B, Sharp JS Hydroxyl Radical Dosimetry for High Flux Hydroxyl Radical Protein Footprinting Applications Using a Simple Optical Detection Method. Anal Chem. 87(21), 10719–10723 (2015) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Niu B, Mackness BC, Rempel DL, Zhang H, Cui W, Matthews CR, Zitzewitz JA, Gross ML Incorporation of a Reporter Peptide in FPOP Compensates for Adventitious Scavengers and Permits Time-Dependent Measurements. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 28(2), 389–392 (2017) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Riaz M, Misra SK, Sharp JS Towards high-throughput fast photochemical oxidation of proteins: Quantifying exposure in high fluence microtiter plate photolysis. Anal Biochem. 561–562(32–36 (2018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Misra SK, Orlando R, Weinberger SR, Sharp JS Compensated Hydroxyl Radical Protein Footprinting Measures Buffer and Excipient Effects on Conformation and Aggregation in an Adalimumab Biosimilar. AAPS J. 21(5), 87 (2019) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Buxton GV, Greenstock CL, Helman WP, Ross AB Critical-Review of Rate Constants for Reactions of Hydrated Electrons, Hydrogen-Atoms and Hydroxyl Radicals (.OH/.O-) in Aqueous-Solution. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data. 17(2), 513–886 (1988) [Google Scholar]
- 20.Abolhasani Khaje N, Mobley CK, Misra SK, Miller L, Li Z, Nudler E, Sharp JS Variation in FPOP Measurements Is Primarily Caused by Poor Peptide Signal Intensity. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 29(9), 1901–1907 (2018) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Atkinson R Kinetics and Mechanisms of the Gas-Phase Reactions of the Hydroxyl Radical with Organic Compounds under Atmospheric Conditions. Chemical Reviews. 85(69–201 (1985) [Google Scholar]
- 22.Garrison WM Reaction-Mechanisms in the Radiolysis of Peptides, Polypeptides, and Proteins. Chemical Reviews. 87(2), 381–398 (1987) [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
