Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2020 Nov 9;22(Suppl 2):ii52. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.211

CTNI-45. A PHASE 1B/2 CLINICAL STUDY OF NAPABUCASIN IN COMBINATION WITH TEMOZOLOMIDE FOR ADULT PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT OR PROGRESSED GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME (GBM)

Andrew Chi 1, Paula DeRobles 2, Emma Foos 3, Matthew Hitron 3, Warren Mason 4
PMCID: PMC7650421

Abstract

Napabucasin is an orally-administered NQO1–bioactivatable investigational agent hypothesized to affect multiple oncogenic cellular pathways including STAT3. This open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study assessed napabucasin plus temozolomide for recurrent/progressive GBM. Phase 1b objectives were safety/tolerability, recommended phase 2 dose (primary), preliminary antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (secondary). Phase 2 objectives were preliminary antitumor activity via 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6 [20% projected]) (primary); disease control rate; median PFS; objective response rate (ORR); and overall survival (OS) (secondary). Arm A enrolled repeat surgical resection candidates; arm B enrolled patients ineligible for further resection. Patients received napabucasin (oral, 480 mg twice-daily) plus temozolomide (150 mg/m2, days 1–5, 28-day cycles). Arm A closed after 4 patients enrolled to prioritize Arm B enrollment. Arm B data are reported. Arm B enrolled/treated 30 patients (median age=56.5 [range=19–83] years; median napabucasin duration=55.0 [range=1–743] days; previous temozolomide=22 [73.3%] patients); all stopped therapy (radiologic progressive disease [PD], n=20; clinically unacceptable toxicities, n=7; follow-up loss, n=2; clinical PD, n=1). Mean relative dose intensity was 67.2% for napabucasin and 90.9% for temozolomide; 14/30 (46.7%) and 25/30 (83.3%) patients received ≥ 90% intended napabucasin and temozolomide doses, respectively. All patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE, grade ≤4); grade 3 TEAEs (≥ 10% patients) were diarrhea (23.3%, 7/30) and abdominal pain (16.7%, 5/30). One patient reported a grade 4 TEAE (seizure, treatment unrelated). PFS-6 was 28.1% (80% CI=16.8%-40.5%). Median PFS was 1.9 months (95% CI=1.8–3.3), with PFS-12 and PFS-18 both 16.8% (80% CI=7.8%-28.8%). ORR was 10% (95% CI=2.1%-26.5%), with 3 partial responses, 6 stable disease, 14 PD, and 7 patients not evaluated. OS-12 was 28.3%. The napabucasin-plus-temozolomide safety profile was consistent with that anticipated for each agent. Napabucasin (480 mg twice-daily) was associated with grade 3 diarrhea and suboptimal compliance. Antitumor effects were observed per the primary endpoint in this patient population.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES