Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2020 Nov 9;22(Suppl 2):ii47. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.190

CTNI-23. IDH1/2wt ANAPLASTIC GLIOMAS OF THE EORTC RANDOMIZED PHASE III INTERGROUP CATNON TRIAL: OVERALL SURVIVAL RELATED TO TREATMENT, MGMT STATUS AND MOLECULAR FEATURES OF GLIOBLASTOMA

C Mircea S Tesileanu 1, Pim French 1, Sarah Erridge 2, Michael Vogelbaum 3, Anna Nowak 4, Marc Sanson 5, Alba Brandes 6, Wolfgang Wick 7, Paul Clement 8, Jean Baurain 8, Warren Mason 9, Helen Wheeler 10, Michael Weller 11, Kenneth Aldape 12, Pieter Wesseling 13, Johan M Kros 1, Vassilis Golfinopoulos 14, Thierry Gorlia 14, Brigitta Baumert 15, Martin van den Bent 1
PMCID: PMC7650495

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The phase III CATNON trial randomized 751 adult patients with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-codeleted anaplastic glioma to 59.4 Gy radiotherapy +/- concurrent and/or adjuvant TMZ. Here, we present the molecular analysis of the IDH1/2wt subgroup, and associations between molecular characteristics and patient outcomes.

METHODS

CNV data and MGMT promoter methylation status were assessed from EPIC methylation array data. IDH1/2 and H3F3A mutation status were determined with a glioma tailored next-generation sequencing panel and TERT promoter mutation status using a SNaPshot assay. Overall survival (OS) was measured from date of randomization.

RESULTS

Of 654 assessed tumors, 211 (32%) were IDH1/2wt. An H3F3A mutation was present in 14 tumors (K27M: n=10; G34R: n=4). Of the remaining 197 patients, 154 tumors had molecular features of glioblastoma according to cIMPACT-NOW 3 criteria (‘IDH1/2wt astrocytomas WHO IV’), 39 tumors did not (‘IDH1/2wt astrocytomas WHO III’), and 4 had inconclusive molecular data. IDH1/2wt astrocytomas WHO III patients had significantly better survival than WHO IV patients: median OS of 2.83 yrs vs 1.43 yrs respectively [log-rank test: p< 0.001]. Of the 154 IDH1/2wt astrocytoma WHO IV, 55 (36%) were found MGMT promoter methylated. MGMT promoter methylation was prognostic in IDH1/2wt astrocytomas WHO IV patients, with a median OS of 1.86 yrs for methylated vs 1.34 yrs for unmethylated [HR 1.62, p=0.006]. In the IDH1/2wt astrocytomas WHO IV, no effect of concurrent and/or adjuvant TMZ was observed; the HR for OS after RT with any TMZ vs RT alone was 1.31 [95% CI 0.73–2.36, p=0.4] for MGMT promoter methylated and 0.90 [95% CI 0.55–1.45, p=0.7] for unmethylated glioma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study validated the prognostic value of the cIMPACT-NOW 3 criteria. MGMT promoter methylation is prognostic but not predictive for outcome to TMZ treatment in this cohort of IDH1/2wt anaplastic gliomas with molecular features of glioblastoma.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES