Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2020 Nov 9;22(Suppl 2):ii80–ii81. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.329

EPID-11. A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CLINICAL, GENOMIC, AND SURVIVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PEDIATRIC, YOUNG ADULT AND OLDER ADULT PATIENTS WITH IDH-MUTANT GLIOMA

Mary Jane Lim-Fat 1, Jayne Vogelzang 2, Eleanor Woodward 2, Alana McGovern 3, Clement Ma 3, Hasan Al-sayegh 3, Sanda Alexandrescu 3, Ashley Margol 4, Jennifer Cotter 4, Kristina Cole 5, Marilyn Li 5, Emily Owens 6, Amy Smith 6, Stewart Goldman 7, Kristiyana Kaneva 7, Emily Burton 8, Kellie Nazemi 8, Karen Wright 9, Patrick Wen 10, Katherine Warren 1, Mehdi Touat 11, David Reardon 12, Wenya Linda Bi 13, Keith Ligon 14, Kee Kiat Yeo 1
PMCID: PMC7651346

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prognostic significance of IDH-mutation in glioma is incompletely understood in children and adolescents/young adults (YAs). We compared the clinico-genomic features, outcomes and prognostic factors observed in IDH-mutant gliomas across age groups.

METHODS

Clinical, histologic and molecular data of patients with IDH-mutant gliomas from 8 pediatric institutions (spanning twenty years) and adult patients from two institutions (from 2013–2019) were identified. Patients were grouped as pediatric (< 19y), YA (19y to < 40y) or older adult (≥ 40y). Genomic alterations, including somatic mutations and copy number variants, were captured with institutional next generation sequencing. Factors were compared across age categories using Fisher’s exact test or analysis-of-variance. Cox proportional-hazards regression tested factors for association with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Of 379 patients, 48(13%) were pediatric, 204(54%) YA and 127(33%) older adult. Histological subtype differed significantly by age group (p< 0.0001). YAs had higher rates of malignant transformation (p=0.01) and shorter time-from-diagnosis-to-malignant transformation (p=0.01) compared to other age groups. Analysis of genomic alterations revealed an age-related difference in distribution in ATRX mutations only (p=0.0018). Median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 4.62 and 17.19 years. In univariate models, PFS differed by age group (p=0.0012), with YAs having the worst outcomes. Lack of MGMT methylation (p=0.024) predicted poorer OS. Upfront observant management was predictive of poorer PFS. Gene mutations were not associated with PFS. In multi-variable models, YAs had shorter PFS compared to pediatric (hazard ratio [HR]=2.03, p=0.01) and older adults (HR=1.59, p=0.003) after adjusting for histology, extent of resection, and initial therapy. Age at diagnosis was not associated with OS in multi-variable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Within our cohort, YA with IDH-mutant tumors progressed more quickly compared to their pediatric counterparts. Further study of YA patients with IDH-mutant glioma is critical to better define best practices for this group.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES