Abstract
Background
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with basal features, lacking the expression of receptors targeted successfully in other breast cancer subtypes. Treatment response to adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy is often short-lived and metastatic spread occurs at higher rates than other subtypes within the first five years after diagnosis. TNBCs exhibit stem cell features and are enriched for cancer stem cell (CSC) populations. E1A Binding Protein P300 (EP300) is a large protein with multiple cellular functions, including as an effector in stem cell biology.
Methods
We used a genetic knockdown (KD) model of EP300 in TNBC cell lines to investigate the effect on CSC phenotype, tumor growth and metastasis. Side population assay and tumorsphere suspension culture were used in vitro. Xenograft mouse models were used for in vivo studies. We performed in silico analysis of publicly available gene expression data sets to investigate CSC gene expression and molecular pathways as well as survival outcomes associated with EP300 expression in patients with TNBC and basal-like BC.
Results
EP300 KD abolished the CSC phenotype by reducing ABCG2 expression, side population cells and tumorsphere formation capacity in vitro as well as tumor formation in a xenograft mouse model in vivo. Metastatic capacity was markedly reduced in EP300 KD cells in vivo, with no detection of circulating tumor cells. TCGA data analysis demonstrated that genes positively correlated with EP300 expression in TNBC and basal-like BC were associated with CSC biology. Survival analysis demonstrated that EP300 expression predicts poor recurrence free survival in TNBC and basal BC.
Conclusion
We report a novel oncogenic role for EP300 in driving CSC phenotype representing a potential target to address tumor initiation and metastatic spread in TNBC and basal-like BC. EP300 might serve as a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target in TNBC.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-020-07573-y.
Keywords: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), Basal-like BC, E1A-associated protein p300 (EP300), Cancer stem cells (CSC), ATP-binding cassette super-family G member 2 (ABCG2)/breast Cancer resistance protein (BCRP), Metastasis
Background
Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease with distinct subtypes each with different pathological and molecular features, variable responsiveness to therapy and clinical outcomes. Approximately 10–20% of all breast cancers are triple negative (TN) and lack the expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors as well as the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2.
Early disease progression and metastasis often occurs within the first 5 years after diagnosis. The lack of targeted therapy options contributes to worse survival for TNBC, despite receipt of cytotoxic chemotherapy [1–3]. Non-targeted neoadjuvant and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy remains as the pharmacological backbone in the clinical management of TNBC. More recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for a subset (10–15%) of TNBCs harboring germline mutations in BRCA1/2 [4] that work via synthetic lethality in this subgroup [5]. Immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination with chemotherapy and targeted therapies are approved [6] or under active investigation (e.g. TOPACIO/KEYNOTE-162, KEYNOTE-086, KEYNOTE-173). Nevertheless, targeted therapies for TNBC are an urgent unmet need in the breast cancer research community and for patients affected by the disease. Molecular studies led to a more detailed understanding of TNBC by defining distinct subtypes with clinical and therapeutic implications, showing that these cancers often exhibit basal-like features and are enriched for cancer stem cell (CSC) populations [7–9]. CSCs are thought to be responsible for tumor initiation, drug resistance and metastasis [10] and were first described in BC by Al-Hajj et al. [11]. CSCs can be identified by the expression of ATP-binding cassette transporters (e.g. MDR1 or ABCG2) as a side population in FACS assays [12].
EP300 (E1A-associated protein p300) is a large (~300KDa), multi-domain protein that functions as a histone/ lysine acetyl transferase and chromatin remodeler as well as acetyltransferase for non-histone targets [13]. As part of various transcriptional complexes EP300 has important and diverse biological functions in cellular proliferation, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, DNA damage repair, cell fate determination and stem cell pluripotency [14]. EP300 has been implicated in cancer biology in general [15] and breast cancer in particular [16], and has been described as both a tumor suppressor [16, 17] and more recently as an oncogene promoting tumor growth, metastatic potential and CSC phenotype in BC [18–20]. In TNBC specific EP300 mutations have been described and EP300 was included in the triple negative breast cancer team project biomarker panel [21]. We hypothesized that EP300 plays an oncogenic role in TNBC biology by regulating CSC populations. We show that knockdown of EP300 abrogates the CSC phenotype of TNBC cells and reduces tumor growth and metastasis.
Methods
Cell culture
MDA-MB-231 and BT20 cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA) and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Canoga Park, CA) + 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA) + 1% Antibiotic-Antimycotic mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). CAL51 was obtained from The Leibniz Institute DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (Braunschweig, Germany) and cultured in DMEM + 20% FBS. Cell lines were authenticated at the University of Arizona Genetics Core (UAGC, Tucson, AZ) using short tandem repeat (STR) profiling. Cell lines were also routinely tested to exclude mycoplasma contamination (MycoAlert™ PLUS Mycoplasma Detection Kit, Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). No ethics approval was required for cell line use. Cell cultures were maintained and propagated in cell culture flasks (Corning Inc., Corning, NY) in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2. To mimic in vivo conditions more closely, cells were also cultured in low glucose (1000 mg/L) DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and under low oxygen conditions (2%). For tumorsphere suspension culture, 20,000 cells per well were cultured in MammoCult culture medium (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) in ultra-low adherence 6-well culture plates (Corning Inc.) for up to 14 days. Spheres of ≥50 μm were counted.
Cell migration assay
To measure cell migration, confluent cell monolayers of 1 × 106cells per well seeded overnight in 6-well plates were scratched using 200 μL plastic micropipette tips. Gap area was recorded immediately after scratching and 72 h later using an inverted microscope (AxioVert.A1, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Gap area was quantified using ImageJ software.
Stable and transient transfection
Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for stable and transient gene knockdown (KD) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Before transfection, cells were seeded at 3 × 105 cells per well in 6-well plates or 1 × 105 cells per well in 24-well plates and incubated with transfection medium for up to 48 h. For stable knockdown EP300 and scramble shRNA vectors (sense 5′- CCGGGCCTTCACAATTCCGAGACATCTCGAGATGTCTCGGAATTGTGAAGGCTTTTTG.
− 3′) were used (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). For selection of cell clones with successful DNA integration, KD cells were further cultured as single cells in 96-well plates under the addition of G418 (geneticin) at 50 μg/ml. Knockdown efficiency was validated via western blotting as described below. siRNA transient gene KD for EP300 (siRNA ID 106443) and negative control were performed in duplicate using Silencer Select siRNAs (Thermo Fisher Scientific). As a control for transfection efficiency, the cells were simultaneously transfected with BLOCK-iT Alexa Fluor Red Fluorescent Oligo (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and red fluorescence expression was validated after 24 h transfection using a Zeiss Axiovert 200 inverted microscope. Gene knockdown was validated via qRT-PCR.
Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA extraction was performed using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. First strand synthesis was performed using the qScript cDNA Supermix (Quantabio, Beverly, MA) and 1 μg of total RNA per reaction. The following reaction conditions were used on a T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Irvine, CA): 25 °C for 5 min, 42 °C for 30 min, 85 °C for 5 min. Samples were prepared as triplicates.
For gene expression quantification, SYBR Green RT-PCR master mix (Quantabio) or TaqMan assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used. Reaction were performed in 96-well plates (Bio-Rad), using 2 μL cDNA, 12.5 μL SYBR Green master mix, 1 μL each forward and reverse primer probes and 8.5 μL nuclease free deionized water. The following reaction conditions were used on a MyiQ or CFX96 Real-Time system (Bio-Rad): 95 °C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 30 s. Primer sequences were obtained via the Harvard primer bank and synthesized by ValueGene (San Diego, CA). To ensure gene-specific priming, the primer sequences were validated using the NCBI BLAST tool and only exon-junction spanning primers used. Primer sequences and corresponding genes are listed in supplementary Table S2.
Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)
Cells were harvested using non-enzymatic cell dissociation buffer (Sigma Aldrich). FACS was performed on a BD LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) equipped with a 405 nm excitation wavelength.
Side population assay
The cell number was adjusted to 1 × 106 cells per mL and re-suspended in complete culture medium (DMEM + 10% FBS + 1% pen strep). Five μg of Hoechst 33342 dye (Sigma Aldrich) was added to each sample. For negative controls, samples were prepared in the same way, plus the addition of 100 μM verapamil (Sigma-Aldrich) to block dye efflux. The samples were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in a cell culture incubator and gently agitated every 30 min. Following incubation, samples were immediately placed on ice and centrifuged at 1000 rpm at 4 °C for 5 min. Cell pellets were re-suspended in 300 μL cold PBS containing 5 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for dead cell exclusion. Our gating strategy included exclusion of cell debris (using forward area vs side scatter are), doublet exclusion (side scatter area vs. height), dead cell exclusion (using PI) and identification of SP cell using Hoechst red vs. Hoechst blue.
Antibody staining
Cells were re-suspended in FACS buffer (PBS + 2% FBS) at 1 × 106 cells per 100 μL and incubated for 15 min on ice with 10 μL of allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated mouse anti-human CD44 antibody (G44–26) (BD Biosciences) or APC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD24 antibody (32D12) (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). For dead cell exclusion,4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma-Aldrich) nuclear dye solution was added.
Cell cycle analysis
Cells were washed twice in ice-cold FACS buffer (PBS + 2% FBS) and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min between washes. After the second wash, the cell pellets were re-suspended in ice cold 80% ethanol. The ethanol was added dropwise under constant vortex agitation, to a final volume of 500 μL ethanol per 1 × 106 cells. Samples were stored at 4 °C until further use. For analysis, 10 μL of a 1 μg/ml 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma-Aldrich) nuclear dye solution was added to a 100 μL ethanol cell suspension.
Protein quantification
Cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and subsequently scraped into ice-cold PBS plus protease inhibitor (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA) and 1 μM Dithiothreitol (DTT) (Sigma-Aldrich), pelleted at 1000 rpm for 5 min and stored and − 80 °C until further use.
For protein extraction, the cell pellets were thawed on ice and processed using the Pierce M-PER Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To ensure loading of equal amounts of protein for each sample, colorimetric protein quantification was performed using a Bio-Rad Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and a SpectraMax M3 spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). For standard curve values, an albumin standard (Thermo Fisher Scientific) dilution serious was used. Protein extracts were mixed 1:1 with 2x Laemmli Sample Buffer (Bio-Rad) containing 5% of 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich) and boiled for 5 min. The samples were loaded onto pre-cast 4–20% gradient gels (PAGEr Gold Precast gels, Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) including a Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standard (Bio-Rad) for size determination. After gel electrophoresis (running buffer: 25 mM Tris HCl, 193 mM glycine, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), pH 8.3) the separated protein fractions were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad) (transfer buffer: 80% Tris-Borate buffer [0.089 M Tris, 0.089 M Borate, pH 8.3], 20% methanol, 25 mM Tris HCl, 193 mM glycine) at 4 °C overnight. The membranes were then blocked in 5% skim milk for 60 min. Primary antibody incubation was performed in blocking solution over night at 4 °C. Primary antibodies: polyclonal rabbit anti-human p300 (N-15), monoclonal mouse anti-human ACTB (H-102) (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies). Secondary antibody incubation was performed for 60 min at room temperature. Secondary antibodies: goat anti-mouse IgG HRP conjugated; and goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP conjugated (both from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies). Subsequently the membranes were incubated with HRP substrate (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA) for 5 min. and chemiluminescence was recorded using a ChemiDoc MP gel imaging system (Bio-Rad). ImageJ software was used for quantification. Samples were prepared in technical duplicates.
Animal experiments
Eight to ten weeks old female NOD scid gamma (NSG) mice (NOD scid IL2Rgammanull, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine) were used for all xenograft experiments. The animals were housed at the USC Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute vivarium, according to IACUC requirements (protocol number 11204). For tumor cell injection, the mice were anesthetized with 2.5–4% isoflurane (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, San Diego, CA) under continuous infusion via a nose cone. At the experimental endpoint (tumor size ~1500mm3 or mice showing significant signs of sickness due to cumulative tumor burden) mice were sacrificed using carbon dioxide in an enclosed chamber, followed by cervical dislocation. All animal procedures adhered to the ARRIVE guidelines [22].
Tumor cell line subcutaneous (s.c.) and tail vein injection
For subcutaneous xenograft experiments, cells were prepared at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells per 100 μL in a 1:1 mix of 75 μL cell culture medium (DMEM/ F12) and 75 μL Matrigel basement membrane (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), for a final volume of 150 μL slurry. A 100 μL bolus of cell slurry was injected subcutaneously into the left hind flank region of each mouse and the puncture site sealed using degradable tissue adhesive (3 M Health Care, St. Paul, MN). Tumor growth was monitored weekly using a digital caliper (VWR, Radnor, PA). Tumor volume was calculated using the formula Volume = (Width × 2 × Length)/2. To investigate whether micro-environmental or paracrine factors affect tumor growth of MDA-MB-231EP300KD cells, wild type cells expression mCherry and MDA-MB-231EP300KD clone 1 (GFP positive) were injected as a 1:1 mix for a total of 1 × 106 cells per mouse.
For tail vein injections, the mice were placed under a heating lamp for 2 min to dilate blood vessels. After subsequent immobilization in a rodent holder (Kent Scientific, Torrington, CT) 1 × 106 cells in 100 μL culture medium were injected per mouse using hypodermic syringes.
In vivo imaging
Tumor growth and spread after tail vein injection was monitored intra-vitally once per week for a total of 5 weeks. Luciferin (Promega, Madison, WI) was prepared at a final concentration of 300 mg/ml. After induction of anesthesia as described above, 300 μL of luciferin was injected intraperitoneally per mouse and allowed to distribute through the body of the animal for 15 min before imaging. Imaging was performed using an IVIS Spectrum pre-clinical in vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) under continued anesthesia. Images were taken after 10 s, 1 min and 3 min each for supine and prone position. Bioluminescence was quantified using the Living Image 4.2 software (PerkinElmer).
Gene association and survival analysis
For gene association studies publicly available data sets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer cohort were used and analyzed via Ingenuity pathway (IPA) tool and cBioPortal [23–25]. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) plotter web interface was used to assesses the effect of EP300 gene expression on survival in breast cancer patients [26]. KM plotter is a meta-analysis-based biomarker assessment tool using a manually curated gene expression database downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The auto selected cut-off was used to define high vs. low expression, which computes the best threshold between the upper and lower quartiles based on sample selection. Recurrence free survival (RFS) was reported at 60-month survival.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad PRISM (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA) was used for statistical analysis of all experiments. Non-normal distribution was assumed, and appropriate non-parametric statistical tests were used; for experiments with single variables and groups of two Mann-Whitney test was used; for three or more groups, non-parametric one-way ANOVA (Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparison) was used. For two variables and groups of two or more two-way ANOVA was used. Statistical hypothesis testing (Sidak test) was used to correct for multiple comparison. Data for repeats were presented as means and standard deviation. A two-tailed statistical significance level (alpha) of 0.05 for all statistical tests was considered meaningful to reject the null hypothesis. For survival analysis after tail vein injection, Kaplan-Meier curves were created and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests were used.
Results
Knockdown of EP300 in MDA-MB-231 cells leads to down-regulation of ABCG2 expression and elimination of the side population CSC phenotype
Reduction in protein and mRNA levels after EP300 knockdown in MDA-MB-231EP300KD clones compared to wild type (WT) and a non-specific scramble control (MDA-MB-231EP300KD clone 1: 27% KD, clone 2: 63% KD) are shown in Fig. 1a (for full membrane image see additional file 1) and Fig. 1b, respectively. Stable EP300 KD in MDA-MB-231 cells as well as transient KD in two other TNBC cell lines (BT20 and CAL51) reduced mRNA expression of ABCG2 (ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily G Member 2) (Fig. 1b and c). The Hoechst 33341 dye efflux assay (side population assay) demonstrated that both MDA-MB-231EP300KD clones were depleted of cells with side population (SP) phenotype (scramble: 1.5%, MDA-MB-231EP300KD clone 1: 0.1%, clone 2: 0%) (Fig. 1d). In summary, these results showed that EP300 KD led to a strong reduction in the expression of the CSC marker ABCG2 and abolished cells with CSC phenotype characterized by the side population in TNBC cells. no different in the distribution of CD44 and CD24 cell surface markers was observed between EP300 KD and scramble transfected MDA-MB-231 cells (supplementary Fig. 1).
Tumorsphere formation capacity is reduced after EP300 KD in TNBC cells
MDA-MB-231EP300KD clones showed significantly reduced tumorsphere formation capacity in vitro (scramble 78 ± 5, KD clone 1 10 ± 2 n.s., KD clone 2 2 ± 3 p = 0.02, n = 3 each) (Fig. 2a). Transient siRNA-mediated KD of EP300 in BT20 also showed reduction of tumorsphere formation, albeit to a lesser degree than stable KD (BT20 KD 43 ± 6 vs. scramble 77 ± 14, p = 0.018; n = 3 each) (Fig. 2b). Gene expression analysis showed reduced expression of CSC markers (EP300, ABCG2, ABCC1, NES) in EP300 KD tumorspheres compared to scramble tumorspheres (Fig. 2c). These results demonstrated that anchorage independent sphere formation as a characteristic of cell with CSC phenotype is reduced by EP300 knockdown to a varying degree in TNBC cell lines.
Knockdown of EP300 abolishes tumor formation and causes G2/M blockade in vivo
While mice bearing xenografts of MDA-MB-231WT and scramble cells developed large tumors within three weeks of cell injection, tumors in MDA-MB-231EP300KD cell xenograft bearing mice barely grew (tumor volume: WT 756.34 ± 58.34 mm3 scramble 978.18 ± 155.87 mm3, EP300 KD clone 1 31.54 ± 10.67 mm3, EP300 KD clone 2 68.17 ± 10.28 mm3) (Fig. 3a and b). In contrast, MDA-MB-231WT and EP300 KD cells showed similar growth dynamics in standard 2D monolayer culture in vitro (Fig. 3c). MDA-MB-231EP300KD cells from dissociated tumors after xenograft culture resumed regular growth dynamics in 2D culture (Fig. 3d). FACS based cell cycle analysis demonstrated that both MDA-MB-231EP300KD and scramble transfected cells showed similar cell cycle phase profiles under in vitro conditions. MDA-MB-231Scramble cells isolated after xenograft culture in vivo showed a similar cell cycle profile to in vitro cultured cells, while MDA-MB-231EP300KD cells displayed a cycle profile indicative of a G2/M block after in vivo culture (Supplementary Fig. S2). Altered metabolic conditions more closely mimicking in vivo settings (low glucose, 2% low oxygen) demonstrated no statistically significant difference in growth behavior of MDA-MB-231EP300KD compared to MDA-MB-231WT or scramble cells in vitro (Supplementary Fig. S3). Similar tumor formation was observed in the mixed xenograft (MDA-MB-231EP300KD plus MDA-MB-231WT) and MDA-MB-231WT cells only xenografts, without any detection of EP300 KD (GFP positive) cells in the mixed xenograft (tumor volume: WT 1076.04 ± 257.3 mm3, mixed xenograft 1178.82 ± 405.16 mm3, EP300 KD clone 1 13.5 mm3) (Fig. 3e). Post xenograft FACS analysis of dissociated tumors revealed that only mCherry positive (WT) cells were present in the mixed xenograft, indicating that tumor growth was due to wild type cell growth only (Fig. 3f). Taken together, the data showed that EP300 KD inhibited tumor initiation/growth in vivo but did not affect the growth behavior of KD cells in vitro even under conditions partially mimicking in vivo condition.
EP300 KD reduces migratory and invasive phenotype and circulating tumor cells
The wound healing assay showed a reduction in gap closure after 72 h in MDA-MBA-231 EP300KD compared to scramble transfected controls as a surrogate for reduced migratory potential (gap area 0 h vs. 72 h: scramble 466,457 ± 58,776 vs. 12,898 ± 20,148, MDA-MBA-231 EP300KD 607,539 ± 44,278 vs. 320,399 ± 88,116, p = 0.0017) (Fig. 4a). After tail vein injection, MDA-MB-231EP300KD cells expressing GFP/luciferase showed no tumor formation in the lungs or other parts of the mouse body in vivo compared to large tumor masses (as determined by fluorescence signal intensity) in the control (scramble) group (RLU × 105: scramble 2.6 ± 3.19, EP300 KD clone 1 0.006 ± 0.004, EP300 KD clone 2 0.004 ± 0.003) (Fig. 4b and c) (MDA-MB-231EP300KD clone 1 vs. scramble p = 0.005, clone 2 vs. scramble p > 0.0001). While all mice in the control group show significant signs of sickness, including low body weight and were sacrificed after 57.5 ± 5.4 days, mice injected with EP300 KD clones showed no sign of disease (Fig. 4d and supplementary Fig. S4) (p = 0.0009). Post necropsy, blood samples of all mice were investigated for the presence of circulating tumor cells based on the presence of GFP-positive cancer cells in FACS analysis. While scrambled xenografted mice had 0.75 ± 0.42% GFP-positive cells in circulation, only 0.05 ± 0.1 and 0% were found in MDA-MB-231p300KD xenograft mice from clone 1 and 2, respectively (Fig. 4e) (p < 0.05). The results showed the EP300 KD abolishes metastatic colonization and spread in the form of circulating tumor cells in TNBC cells.
EP300 correlated genes show CSC related transcription in TNBC and basal-like BC
The TCGA breast cancer cohort was filtered for TNBC (n = 82) or basal-like breast cancers (n = 81), which based on gene expression showed an overlap of n = 33 cases between both sample groups (Fig. 5a). Gene expression demonstrated that n = 3037 and n = 509 genes in TNBC and basal-like BC, respectively, correlated positively with EP300 expression (FDR < 0.05), with n = 298 genes correlating in both subgroups (Fig. 5b and supplementary Table S1). The top associated pathways and biological functions in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) are shown in Fig. 5b. While genes correlating with EP300 in basal breast cancer were associated with stem cell biology and cancer metastasis, EP300 correlated genes in TNBC were associated with growth factor signaling pathways (Fig. 5c). All three sets of genes positively correlated with EP300 (TNBC, basal-like BC and the overlap between both) were linked to PTEN and Protein kinase A (PKA) signaling (Fig. 5c).
Using the overlap gene signature (n = 298 genes) to analyze associated biological function via cBioPortal showed that the top associated pathways were TP53/BRCA, Notch and Wnt signaling (Fig. 5d and supplementary Fig. S5). The expression of affected genes in these pathways (Notch – CREBBP, SPEN; Wnt – GSK3B) showed strong positive correlation with EP300 expression on a per sample basis (Fig. 5e). The graphs for Fig. 5d and e were created and directly exported form cBioPortal [25]. These results demonstrated that EP300 expression correlated with CSC related genes and pathways (Notch, Wnt, BRCA/TP53) suggesting at complex role of EP300 in CSC biology.
EP300 is prognostic in TNBC and basal-like BC
The association between EP300 expression and RFS was assessed in 6234 breast cancer patients, of which 198 TNBC cases were available for analysis. High EP300 gene expression was statistically significantly correlated with worse RFS in TNBC and basal-like BC patients with lymph node metastasis or high-grade tumors (G3) (Fig. 6). Although not all results reached statistical significance, there was a clear trend towards increasing hazard ratios (HR) associated with higher histological grade (G3) and lymph node (LN) metastasis, with the highest HR in TNBC G3 and positive LN metastasis (Fig. 6). Comparing all PAM50 subtypes to basal-like BC had no significant effect on recurrence free survival. Of note, while higher EP300 RNA expression was associated with a better prognosis in BC in general (Supplementary Fig. S6A), high EP300 protein expression demonstrated worse RFS (HR 3.32, 1.53–7.19) in all BC patients (Supplementary Fig. S6B). The results demonstrated that high EP300 RNA expression might function as prognostic marker for poor RFS in TNBC/basal-like breast cancer.
Discussion
We demonstrated that knockdown of EP300 reduced the expression of ABCG2, eliminated side population cells and decreased tumor initiating as well as metastatic potential. EP300 gene expression in large published breast cancer data sets positively corresponded with genes and molecular pathways associated with CSC function and predicted poor RFS in TNBC and basal-like BC. Collectively these data demonstrated a novel oncogenic role for EP300 in TNBC and basal-like breast cancer biology.
ABCG2 (also known as the breast cancer resistance protein – BCRP) plays a pivotal role in drug resistance (e.g. anthracyclines and topoisomerase inhibitors) and as important marker of side population cells, which are enriched for cells with CSC characteristics in breast cancer [27, 28]. Our study showed a correlation between reduction in ABCG2 expression and side population phenotype. Patrawala et al. showed that while the side population was enriched for tumorigenic CSC-like cells, ABCG2 levels did not affect their tumorigenic potential [28]. Other BC-CSC markers and phenotypes have been described (e.g. EPCAM+CD44+CD24− phenotype [11], SOX2 [29], and ALDH1 [30]) and it would be of interest to investigate the effect of EP300 KD on these cell populations. Nevertheless, functional characterization (i.e. tumor initiation) of CSCs should be considered the gold standard as limited marker profiles may identify distinct subpopulations and not fully capture functional CSC [31].
We observed a stark difference between regular 2D culture and 3D tumorsphere as well as in vivo tumor formation. The microenvironment plays a critical role in tumor development via paracrine signaling or physical factors. Stromal cells can function as both tumor suppressors or promoters, depending on context [32–34]. Although xenograft co-culture with MDA-MB-231WT or oxygen and glucose levels did not affect MDA-MB-231EP300KD growth in vivo or in vitro, respectively, it is conceivable that the complex interplay between cancer cells, in particular CSC and the tumor environment may affect growth and tip the balance towards the suppression of tumor outgrowth after EP300 knockdown. EP300 has been shown to affect tumor-propagating physical properties [35], in concordance with the observed difference in 2D adherent culture and 3D suspension culture in the current study. Differences we observed in tumorsphere formation capacity after EP300 KD between different TNBC cell lines could be due to technical differences in gene knock down (stable vs. transient) or have distinct biological reasons such as the claudin-low versus basal-like subtypes [36].
Since we used an immunocompromised (NSG) mouse model, immunological factors are unlikely to play a role in the absence of in vivo tumor formation through EP300 KD. Nevertheless, Xiong et al. showed that EP300 expression might be predictive of hyper progressive disease after PD-L1 blockade [37] and it would be of interest to investigate the role of EP300 in TNBC cells in the context of a functional immune system [38].
In agreement with findings that EP300 increases migratory potential and invasiveness of cancer cells [39, 40], we demonstrated reduced lung colonization and distant metastasis as well as circulating tumor cells via EP300 KD in TNBC cells.
Based on our findings, future studies should investigate whether EP300 targeted drugs (flufenamic acid [18], VV59 [19], A-485 [41]) can inhibit tumor initiation and metastasis in TNBC pre-clinical models.
TCGA analysis of TNBC and basal-like BC samples showed that pathways associated with CSC biology (integrin and integrin-linked kinase (ILK) signaling [42], Wnt/ß-catenin [43], actin-ARP-WASP [44], Notch signaling [45], BRCA [46] and embryonic stem cells (ES) transcriptional networks) were positively correlated with EP300 expression. Specific genes, such as PTEN, protein kinase A (PKA), GSK3B, CREBBP, SPEN have been linked to CSC biology and metastasis in breast cancer [47–51]. Since EP300 is an important epigenetic regulator via histone modifications, further analysis of the relationship between CSC gene expression and histone acetylation through EP300 are warranted.
Our survival analysis in-silico demonstrated worse RFS correlated with high EP300 expression in TNBC and basal-like BC patients with high grade (G3) or LN metastasized tumors. Although not statistically significant due to small patient numbers, there was a trend toward increased hazard ratios for patients with both high grade and LN metastasized tumors.
Naturally there are limitations to our study. The fact that only a single cell line was used for in vivo studies, as well as the use of immunocompromised mice limits the extrapolation of our results to the complex conditions in individual BC patients. The effect of the immune system on tumor growth is one of the most exciting and promising area of cancer research and the effect of EP300 expression in this context should be explored. The role of the tumor microenvironment more generally seems to play a critical role in the findings described here and invites further detailed experimentation. EP300 has been found to have tumor suppressor [16, 17] as well as an oncogenic properties [18, 19]. Another famous tumor suppressor, TP53, has been shown to potentially have pro-tumorigenic effects via increased inflammation [52] or anti-apoptotic mechanisms [53]. Collectively, these findings raise the possibility that context matters.
Conclusion
The data presented here is to our knowledge the first study describing a context-depended oncogenic role of EP300 in CSC phenotype in TNBC and basal-like breast cancer. Knockdown of EP300 eliminated CSCs in vitro and decreased tumor initiating as well as metastatic potential in vivo. Large breast cancer gene expression data sets revealed that EP300 expression is positively correlated with the expression of CSC markers and poor prognosis in TNBC and basal-like BC. Our results warrant further exploration of EP300 as a prognostic factor and potential therapeutic target in TNBC and basal-like BC.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for support from the laboratory of Michael Kahn which provided reagents, equipment and expertise for this study. We also thank the USC Molecular Imaging Center for their support and valuable insights.
Abbreviations
- ABCG2
ATP-binding cassette super-family G member 2
- CSC
Cancer Stem Cells
- EP300
E1A Binding Protein P300
- FACS
Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting
- GFP
Green Fluorescent Protein
- KD
Knockdown
- NOD
Non-Obese Diabetic
- RFS
Recurrence Free Survival
- RLU
Relative Light Unit
- TCGA
The Cancer Genome Atlas
- SCID
Severe Combined Immunodeficiency
- TNBC
Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Authors’ contributions
A.R. conceptualization, methodology, A.R. and J.E.L.; validation, A.R., J.E.L. and P.K.; data curation, A.R., J.E.L. and P.K.; writing – original draft preparation, A.R. and J.E.L., writing – review and editing, A.R., J.E.L. and P.K.; visualization, X.X.; supervision, J.E.L..; project administration, J.E.L.; funding acquisition, A.R. and J.E.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by a California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) clinical fellowship (TG2–01161) to A.R. and in part by award number P30CA014089 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to J.E.L. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Availability of data and materials
The gene expression datasets analyzed during the current study are publicly available in the cBioPortal and KM plotter as referenced in the manuscript. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The animals were housed at the USC Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute vivarium, according to IACUC requirements (protocol number 11204). All procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of Southern California (USC).
Consent for publication
not applicable.
Competing interests
Dr. Julie Lang is on the speaker bureau of Genomic Health and received research funding unrelated to this work from ANGLE Parsortix. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Liedtke C, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(8):1275–1281. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dent R, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(15 Pt 1):4429–4434. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Reddy SM, et al. Long-term survival outcomes of triple-receptor negative breast cancer survivors who are disease free at 5 years and relationship with low hormone receptor positivity. Br J Cancer. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 4.McCann KE, Hurvitz SA. Advances in the use of PARP inhibitor therapy for breast cancer. Drugs Context. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Ashworth A, Lord CJ, Reis-Filho JS. Gentic interactions in cancer progression and treatment. Cell. 2011;145(1):30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schmid P, et al. Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 7.Lehmann BD, et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest. 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Banerjee S, et al. Basal-like breast carcinomas: Clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy. J Clin Pathol. 2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Ma F, et al. Enriched CD44+/CD24- population drives the aggressive phenotypes presented in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cancer Lett. 2014. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 10.Adorno-Cruz V, et al. Cancer stem cells: targeting the roots of cancer, seeds of metastasis, and sources of therapy resistance. Cancer Res. 2015;75(6):924–929. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Al-Hajj M, Wicha MS, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(7):3983–3988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0530291100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hirschmann-Jax C, et al. A distinct ‘side population’ of cells with high drug efflux capacity in human tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(39):14228–14233. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400067101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ogryzko VV, Schiltz RL, Russanova V, Howard BH, Nakatani Y. The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases. Cell. 1996;87(5):953–959. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)82001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Goodman RH, Smolik S. CBP/p300 in cell growth, transformation, and development. Genes Dev. 2000;14(13):1553–1577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Iyer NG, Ozdag H, Caldas C. p300/CBP and cancer. Oncogene. 2004;23(24):4225–4231. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gayther SA, et al. Mutations truncating the EP300 acetylase in human cancers. Nat Genet. 2000;24(3):300–303. doi: 10.1038/73536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Asaduzzaman M, et al. Tumour suppressor EP300, a modulator of paclitaxel resistance and stemness, is downregulated in metaplastic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;163(3):461–474. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4202-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mahmud Z, et al. Oncogenic EP300 can be targeted with inhibitors of aldo-keto reductases. Biochem Pharmacol. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 19.Fermento ME, et al. Inhibition of p300 suppresses growth of breast cancer. Role of p300 subcellular localization. Exp Mol Pathol. 2014. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20.Cho MH, et al. DOT1L cooperates with the c-Myc-p300 complex to epigenetically derepress CDH1 transcription factors in breast cancer progression. Nat Commun. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Bemanian V, et al. Somatic EP300-G211S mutations are associated with overall somatic mutational patterns and breast cancer specific survival in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 22.Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: The arrive guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Ciriello G, et al. Comprehensive Molecular Portraits of Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer. Cell. 2015;163(2):506–519. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cancer Genome Atlas N. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490(7418):61–70. doi: 10.1038/nature11412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cerami E, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(5):401–404. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Györffy B, et al. An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1,809 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 27.Zhou S, Morris JJ, Barnes Y, Lan L, Schuetz JD, Sorrentino BP. Bcrp1 gene expression is required for normal numbers of side population stem cells in mice, and confers relative protection to mitoxantrone in hematopoietic cells in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Patrawala L, Calhoun T, Schneider-Broussard R, Zhou J, Claypool K, Tang DG. Side population is enriched in tumorigenic, stem-like cancer cells, whereas ABCG2 + and ABCG2 - cancer cells are similarly tumorigenic. Cancer Res. 2005. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 29.Leis O, et al. Sox2 expression in breast tumours and activation in breast cancer stem cells. Oncogene. 2012. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 30.Ginestier C, et al. ALDH1 Is a Marker of Normal and Malignant Human Mammary Stem Cells and a Predictor of Poor Clinical Outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 31.Liu Y, et al. Lack of correlation of stem cell markers in breast cancer stem cells. Br J Cancer. 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Bussard KM, Mutkus L, Stumpf K, Gomez-Manzano C, Marini FC. Tumor-associated stromal cells as key contributors to the tumor microenvironment. Breast Cancer Res. 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Maris P, et al. Asporin Is a Fibroblast-Derived TGF-β1 Inhibitor and a Tumor Suppressor Associated with Good Prognosis in Breast Cancer. PLoS Med. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Kalluri R, Zeisberg M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Dou C, et al. P300 Acetyltransferase Mediates Stiffness-Induced Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells Into Tumor-Promoting Myofibroblasts. Gastroenterology. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Prat A, et al. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 37.Xiong D, Wang Y, Singavi AK, Mackinnon AC, George B, You M. Immunogenomic Landscape Contributes to Hyperprogressive Disease after Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy for Cancer. iScience. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Zou Y, et al. The proto-oncogene Bcl3 induces immune checkpoint PD-L1 expression, mediating proliferation of ovarian cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Hou X, et al. p300 promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion via inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Retracted]
- 40.Liao ZW, et al. P300 promotes migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in a nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell line. Oncol Lett. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.Lasko LM, et al. Discovery of a selective catalytic p300/CBP inhibitor that targets lineage-specific tumours. Nature. 2017;550(7674):128–132. doi: 10.1038/nature24028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Seguin L, Desgrosellier JS, Weis SM, Cheresh DA. Integrins and cancer: Regulators of cancer stemness, metastasis, and drug resistance. Trends Cell Biol. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Pohl SG, Brook N, Agostino M, Arfuso F, Kumar AP, Dharmarajan A. Wnt signaling in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogenesis. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 44.Frugtniet B, Martin TA. Role of the wasp and wave family proteins in breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Breast Cancer Targets Ther. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 45.Bhola NE, et al. Treatment of triple-negative breast cancer with TORC1/2 inhibitors sustains a drug-resistant and notch-dependent cancer stem cell population. Cancer Res. 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Kim H, Lin Q, Yun Z. BRCA1 regulates the cancer stem cell fate of breast cancer cells in the context of hypoxia and histone deacetylase inhibitors. Sci Rep. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Baker A, et al. Notch-1-PTEN-ERK1/2 signaling axis promotes HER2+ breast cancer cell proliferation and stem cell survival. Oncogene. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Shi P, et al. Metformin suppresses triple-negative breast cancer stem cells by targeting KLF5 for degradation. Cell Discov. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Vijay GV, et al. GSK3β regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell properties in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 50.Légaré S, Chabot C, Basik M. SPEN, a new player in primary cilia formation and cell migration in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Ring A, et al. CBP/Β-catenin/FOXM1 is a novel therapeutic target in triple negative breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 52.Yan HX, et al. DNA damage-induced sustained p53 activation contributes to inflammation-associated hepatocarcinogenesis in rats. Oncogene. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 53.Jänicke RU, Sohn D, Schulze-Osthoff K. The dark side of a tumor suppressor: Anti-apoptotic p53. Cell Death Differ. 2008. [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The gene expression datasets analyzed during the current study are publicly available in the cBioPortal and KM plotter as referenced in the manuscript. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).