Abstract
Repetitive DNA is an important component of eukaryotic genomes, accounting for more than 90% of the genome size of some species, including mobile elements and satellite DNA sequences. The aim of study was to characterize the genome of Hancornia speciosa Gomes using C-value genome size estimate and repetitive DNA sequences analysis. The genome size estimate was obtained by flow cytometry and the repetitive DNA sequences were accessed using graph-based clustering. Evolutionary relationships among species of Apocynaceae was obtained using reads of Catharanthus roseus L., Rhayza stricta Decne, and Asclepias syriaca L. from the NCBI and analyzed by graph-based clustering. The genome size estimates in two botanical varieties showed 2C-values ranging from 0.88 to 1.08 pg, indicating small genome size. Clusters representing repeats making up at least 0.01% of the genome revealed the proportion of repetitive DNA ranging from 19.87% (H. speciosa) to 51.674% (A. syriaca), of which the mobile elements were more abundant. Satellite DNA sequences were not found in H. speciosa and R. stricta, while at least one satellite was detected in C. roseus and A. syriaca, suggesting that the LTR retrotransposon Ty3/Gypsy/Chromovirus may have replaced the satellite DNA in H. speciosa and R. stricta.
Keywords: NGS, mangaba, satDNA, chromovirus, evolution
Repetitive DNA is the most relevant component in genome evolution and consists of several large classes, among which the transposable elements (TEs) and satellite DNA sequences (satDNA) are the most important (Biscotti et al., 2015). TEs are generally the most abundant and can be classified into retrotransposons or Class I (“copy and paste”) and transposons or Class II (Wicker et al., 2007; Rebollo et al., 2012). The second most abundant class is satDNA, which is characterized by long arrays of tandemly arranged units (known as monomers). SatDNAs are the main components of constitutive heterochromatin, spanning up to several megabases in length with high evolutionary dynamics and high intra- and inter-specific sequence diversity, of which most satellite families are species- or genus-specific (Macas et al., 2002; Belyayev et al., 2019).
Hancornia speciosa Gomes (family Apocynaceae, Gentianales) is a fruit tree from tropical and subtropical regions. The species has a broad geographic distribution in Brazil, occurs in Caatinga, Cerrado and in two ecoregions of the Atlantic Rain Forest: the Coastal Tablelands and Restinga (Lima and Scariot, 2010). The species also occurs in Paraguay, Bolivia and Peru (Collevatti et al., 2016). H. speciosa is an economically important plant, popularly known as “mangaba” or “mangabeira,” and is consumed as candy, ice-cream, juice or “in natura”, and the fruits have high concentration of vitamin C (Lima and Scariot, 2010; Santos et al., 2017). The leaves have medicinal properties for treating diabetes (Pereira et al., 2015) and blood pressure (Silva et al., 2016). The latex has been reported to have medicinal properties to treat ulcers, gastritis and tuberculosis (Ribeiro et al., 2016).
Hancornia speciosa is poor in molecular genetics studies and there is no information about the genome size, evolution or genome organization. In addition, monoculture of crop plants and urban expansion have reduced the natural populations. The Apocynaceae family has a robust phylogeny, containing monophyletic and paraphyletic subfamilies; however, some tribes and the paraphyletic Rauvolfioideae and Apocynoideae subfamilies require new studies for a better understanding of paraphyly (Fishbein et al., 2018). H. speciosa belongs to the Rauvolfioideae subfamily, and genomic studies, including repetitive DNA contribute to understanding paraphyly in Rauvolfioideae and the relationships among Apocynaceae species. The aims of this study were to determine the genome size and characterize the repetitive DNA in H. speciosa. We also explored high-throughput sequencing to characterize the repetitive fractions for a better understanding of H. speciosa genomic evolution. The following questions were of interest: (1) What is the genome size estimate of H. speciosa? (2) What are the components and amounts of the repetitive fractions in the H. speciosa genome? (3) What are the genomic relationships of S. speciosa with to other species of Apocynaceae family.
Genome size was determined by flow cytometry. A suspension of nuclei from young leaves was prepared as described by Dolezel et al. (2007) using WPB buffer. The genome sizes were estimated using a CyFlow SL flow cytometer (Partec, Görlitz, Germany). Final DNA content was calculated for each accession based on at least three different measurements. The young leaves of Solanum lycopersium L. (1C = 1.96 pg DNA) (Dolezel et al., 2010) were used as an internal control. FloMax software (Partec) was used for data processing. Genome size was estimated for two botanical varieties of H. speciosa (var. speciosa and var. gardneri).
H. speciosa plant material was collected in the state of Paraíba, Brazil (7°30’53”S; 34°53’07”W), and total DNA was extracted (including nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial DNA) from approximately 2 cm2 of leaves following the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide extraction method, according to the protocol in Doyle and Doyle (1990) without modifications. The quantity and quality of the extracted DNA was verified by visualization on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The DNA samples were fragmented into 400–600 bp fragments using a mechanical procedure to construct the sequencing paired-end library. The fragments were ligated with adapters using “Nextera DNA Sample Preparation” (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and 2×100 bp paired-ends were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform. Sequencing was performed at the Central Laboratory for High Performance Technologies in Life Sciences (LaCTAD-Laboratório Central de Tecnologias de Alto Desempenho em Ciências da Vida) at the State University of Campinas-UNICAMP, SP, Brazil.
The reads were trimmed using BBDuk and were used as input for comparative graph-based clustering with Repeat Explorer software (Novak et al., 2010) and Tandem Repeat Analyzer (TAREAN) software (Novák et al., 2017) implemented in the Galaxy environment (http://repeatexplorer-elixir.cerit-sc.cz) to identify satDNA, using repeatmasker database to provide information for annotation. The Repeat Explorer analysis allowed us to detect the genomic proportion of repetitive DNA, while TAREAN is a computational pipeline used to identify satDNAs from unassembled sequence reads. Paired-end reads of A. syriaca, R. stricta, and C. roseus were obtained from the NCBI and used for repeat identification and the comparative analysis in Apocynaceae.
The flow cytometry analysis revealed that the genome size ranged of the 2C-values 0.87 ± 0.02 and 0.88 ± 0.01 pg for H. speciosa var. speciosa and H. speciosa var. gairdneri, respectively, which corresponded to 1C-value of 430 Mb (1C values are measured in picograms, with 1 pg equivalent to 978 Mb). Pairwise comparisons among botanical varieties using Tukey's test (p < 0.05) showed that the botanical varieties had similar genomes (Table S1 (98.6KB, pdf) ). Graph-based clustering revealed that the repetitive fraction corresponded to 38.24% in H. speciosa, 49.23% in C. roseus, 38.85% in R. stricta, and 74.18% in A. syriaca (Table S1 (98.6KB, pdf) ). Clusters representing repeats making up at least 0.01% of the genome were characterized, of which the results for each species were 162 clusters in H. speciosa, 316 in C. roseus, 225 in R. stricta, and 239 in A. syriaca, corresponding to 19.87%, 36.63%, 23.025% and 51.674%, respectively (Figure 1 and Table 1). The repeatitive DNA showed that TEs were more abundant in all genomes, of which the LTR retrotransposons, including Ty1/copia and Ty3/Gypsy represented the major proportion. Abundance of the LTR retrotransposons ranged from 5.62% (H. speciosa) to 25.535% (S. syriaca), while the non-LTR was in a minor proportion or absent in some species (Table 1).
Figure 1. Graph-based clustering results. Repetitive DNA abundance (A) and characterization (B) of the repetitive DNA fraction in the Hancornia speciosa, Asclepias syriaca, Rhazya stricta, and Catharanthus roseus genomes.
Table 1. Genome proportions of repetitive sequences in Hancornia speciosa, Catharanthus roseus, Rhazya stricta and Asclepias syriaca.
| Class | Order | Superfamily | Family | Genome [%] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H. speciosa | C. roseus | R. stricta | A. syriaca | ||||
| Retrotransposons | LTR | Ty1-Copia | Ale | 0.342 | 0.801 | 0.678 | 0.606 |
| Angela | 0.250 | 0.850 | 0.355 | 0 | |||
| Bianca | 0.042 | 0.015 | 0.273 | 2.078 | |||
| Ikeros | 1.699 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.04 | |||
| Ivana/Oryco | 0 | 0.0099 | 0.721 | 0.427 | |||
| SIRE | 0 | 1.628 | 1.049 | 0 | |||
| TAR | 0.1 | 0.571 | 0.18 | 0 | |||
| Tork | 0.052 | 1.97 | 0.808 | 1.947 | |||
| Total | 2.485 | 6.1449 | 4.064 | 5.098 | |||
| Ty3- Gypsy | Athila | 0.3 | 1.302 | 1.702 | 15.58 | ||
| Chromovirus | 2.662 | 5.103 | 2.941 | 2.18 | |||
| Ogre/Tat | 0.171 | 0 | 1.066 | 2.677 | |||
| Total | 3.133 | 6.405 | 5.709 | 20.437 | |||
| Retrovirus | Pararetrovirus | 0.38 | 0.68 | 0.735 | 0 | ||
| Non-LTR (LINE) | L1 | 0.22 | 0.019 | 0.22 | 0 | ||
| Total | 6.218 | 13.249 | 10.728 | 25.535 | |||
| Transposons | TIR | CACTA | 0.459 | 1.179 | 0.05 | 0.021 | |
| hAT | 0.771 | 0.542 | 0.14 | 0 | |||
| PIF-Harbinger | 0 | 0 | 0.026 | 0 | |||
| Mutator | 0 | 1.439 | 0.265 | 0.042 | |||
| Total | 1.23 | 3.16 | 0.481 | 0.063 | |||
| Helitron | Helitron | 0.011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Total (TEs) | 7.459 | 16.409 | 11.209 | 25.598 | |||
| rDNA | 4.818 | 1.008 | 1.134 | 2.22 | |||
| satDNAs | 0 | 5.332 | 0 | 0.274 | |||
| Total unidentified | 7.609 | 13.882 | 10.682 | 23.582 | |||
| Total Repeat | 19.886 | 36.631 | 23.025 | 51.674 | |||
Among the LTR Ty3/Gypsy, the chromovirus family was most abundant in H. speciosa, C. roseus, and R. stricta, which corresponded to 2.662%, 5.103%, and 2.941%, respectively, while the Athila family was more abundant in A. syriaca with 15.58% of the genome (Table 1 and Figure S1 (255.9KB, pdf) ). A similar distribution among species was observed for the Ty1/Copia families, in which a major abundance of the Bianca family was detected in A. syriaca (Table 1 and Figure S1 (255.9KB, pdf) ). Among the transposons, Mutator was more abundant in C. roseus (1.439%); however, some elements were absent in H. speciosa, R. stricta, and A. syriaca (Table 1).
The high-throughput search for satDNAs revealed eight satDNAs in C. roseus (corresponding to 5.332% of the genome) and seven satDNAs in A. syriaca (corresponding to 0.274% of the genome), whereas satDNAs were not found for H. speciosa or R. stricta (Table 1 and Figure S1 (255.9KB, pdf) ). Moderately repetitive DNA was detected in the rDNA, ranging from 1% (C. roseus) to 4.818% (H. speciosa) (Table 1). Repeat DNA Ty3/Gypsy was interlaced on the rDNA intergenic spacer, resulting in the increase of the intergenic spacer (Figure S2 (93.6KB, pdf) ).
Repetitive DNA sequences are characterized as highest repetitive in eukaryotic genomes, which increases genome sizes (Kazazian Jr, 2004). Among the components of the repetitive DNA, TEs are most important and correspond to the highest proportion of the genome (Feschotte et al., 2008). The present study analyzed the fraction of repetitive DNA sequences in the three members of the Apocynaceae family and compared them to the fraction in the H. speciosa genome. We obtained H. speciosa (subfamily Rauvolfioideae) paired-end reads and paired-end reads of R. stricta (subfamily Rauvolfioideae), C. roseus (subfamily Rauvolfioideae), and A. syriaca (subfamily Asclepiodeae) were obtained from NCBI. Genome size is an important estimate of the amount of DNA in the cell nucleus and is known as the C-value (Pellicer et al., 2018). The genome size estimate is classified as a small genome when the 1C-value is < 3.5 pg (Kelly and Leitch, 2011). Accordingly, we concluded that H. speciosa has a small genome and there was some minor variation across botanical varieties. The small genome size of H. speciosa (average 1C-value = 0.44 pg), together with other Apocynaceae species (Table S1 (98.6KB, pdf) and Plant DNA C-values Database - https://cvalues.science.kew.org/), suggests that the family may be characterized with a small genome size. Genome size may be positively correlated with the repetitive fraction; however, the A. syriaca genome was highly repetitive, with a genome size 1C-value of 0.42 pg. The high proportion of repetitive DNA detected in A. syriaca may be due to the high abundance of the LTR retrotransposon (25.535%), of which 15.58% corresponded to the Athila family, while the repetitive DNA in other species may be compounded by several families with minor proportions that were undetectable by graph-based clustering.
Characterization of the H. speciosa genome revealed a greater abundance of the LTR retrotransposon, of which the chromovirus had a greater proportion. This characteristic is similar to other species of Apocynaceae, in which the LTR retrotransposons were more abundant in all of the genomes analyzed. SatDNA was absent in H. speciosa and R. stricta, suggesting that transposable elements may have replaced the typical satDNA. LTR retrotransposons are localized in the centromeres of plants (Weber and Schmidt, 2009) and the LTRs Gypsy/Chromovirus have a domain associated with chromatin, which interacts with centromeric proteins (Nagaki et al., 2003). Future molecular cytogenetics studies may clarify whether chromovirus replaced the satDNA in H. speciosa. We conclude that H. speciosa has a small genome characterized predominantly by LTR retrotransposons and the absence of satDNA.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Federal University of Alagoas for the laboratories and scientific support and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Alagoas (FAPEAL) for funding this project.
Supplementary material
The following online material is available for this article.
Footnotes
Associate Editor: Dario Grattapaglia
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Author Contributions
VS and CA. analyzed data and wrote the manuscript and EFS wrote the manuscript, all authors read and approved the final version.
References
- Bai C, Alverson WS, Follansbee A, Waller DM. New reports of nuclear DNA content for 407 vascular plant taxa from the United States. Ann Bot. 2012;110:1623–1629. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biscotti MA, Olmo E, Heslop-Harrison JS. Repetitive DNA in eukaryotic genomes. Chromosome Res. 2015;23:415–420. doi: 10.1007/s10577-015-9499-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Collevatti RG, Olivatti AM, Telles MPC, Chaves LJ. Gene flow among Hancornia speciosa (Apocynaceae) varieties and hybrid fitness. Tree Genet Genomes. 2016;12:74. [Google Scholar]
- Belyayev A, Josefiová J, Jandová M, Kalendar R, Krak K, Mandák B. Natural history of a satellite DNA family: from the ancestral genome component to species-specific sequences, concerted and non-concerted evolution. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1201. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dolezel J, Greilhuber J. Nuclear genome size: are we getting closer. Cytometry A. 2010;77:635–642. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dolezel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:2233–2244. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid total DNA preparation procedure for fresh plant tissue. Focus. 1990;12:13–15. [Google Scholar]
- Feschotte C. The contribution of transposable elements ot the evolution of regulatory networks. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:397–405. doi: 10.1038/nrg2337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fishbein M, Straub SCK, Boutte J, Hansen K, Cronn RC, Liston A. Evolution at the tips: Asclepias phylogenomics and new perspectives on leaf surfaces. Am J Bot. 2018;105:514–524. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guimarães G, Cardoso L, Oliveira H, Santos C, Duarte P, Sottomayor M. Cytogenetic characterization and genome size of the medicinal plant catharanthus roseus (L.) g. don. AoB Plants. 2012;12:1–10. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/pls002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kazazian HH., Jr Mobile elements: drivers of genome evolution. Science. 2004;303:1626–1632. doi: 10.1126/science.1089670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelly LJ, Leitch IJ. Exploring giant plant genomes with next-generation sequencing technology. Chromosom Res. 2011;19:939–953. doi: 10.1007/s10577-011-9246-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lima ILP, Scariot A. Boas práticas de manejo para o extrativismo sustentável da Mangaba. Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília. 2010:68p. [Google Scholar]
- Macas J, Mészáros T, Nouzová M. PlantSat: A specialized database for plant satellite repeats. Bioinformatics. 2002;18:28–35. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagaki K, Song J, Stupar RM, Parokonny AS, Yuan Q, Ouyang S, Liu J, Hsiao J, Jones KM, Dawe RK, et al. Molecular and cytological analyses of large tracks of centromeric DNA reveal the structure and evolutionary dynamics of maize centromeres. Genetics. 2003;163:759–770. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.2.759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Novák P, Neumann P, Macas J. Graph-based clustering and characterization of repetitive sequences in next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:1–12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Novák P, Robledillo LÁ, Koblízková A, Vrbová I, Neumann P, Macas J. TAREAN: A computational tool for identification and characterization of satellite DNA from unassembled short reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:e111. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pellicer J. Genome size diversity and its impact on the evolution of land plants. Genes. 2018;9:88. doi: 10.3390/genes9020088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pereira AC, Pereira ABD, Moreira CCL, Botion LM, Lemos VS, Braga FC, Cortes SF. Hancornia speciosa Gomes (Apocynaceae) as a potential anti-diabetic drug. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015;161:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2014.11.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rebollo R, Romanish MT, Mager DL. Transposable elements: an abundant and natural source of regulatory sequences for host genes. Annu Rev Genet. 2012;46:21–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro TP, Sousa TR, Arruda AS, Peixoto N, Gonçalves PJ, Almeida LM. Evaluation of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of Hancornia speciosa latex in Allium cepa root model. Braz J Biol. 2016;76:245–249. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.20114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sabir JSM, Jansen RK, Arasappan D, Calderon V, Noutahi E, Zheng C, Park S, Sabir MJ, Baeshen MN, Hajrah NH, et al. The nuclear genome of Rhazya stricta and the evolution of alkaloid diversity in a medically relevant clade of Apocynaceae. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33782. doi: 10.1038/srep33782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos PS, Santos FL, Silva JGS, Muniz EN, Rabbani ARC, Silva AVC. Genetic diversity and the quality of Mangabeira tree fruits (Hancornia speciosa Gomes – Apocynaceae), a native species from Brazil. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 2017;226:372–378. [Google Scholar]
- Silva GC, Braga FC, Lemos VS, Cortes SF. Potent antihypertensive effect of Hancornia speciosa leaves extract. Phytomedicine. 2016;23:214–219. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2015.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weber B, Schmidt T. Nested Ty3-gypsy retrotransposons of a single Beta procumbens centromere contain a putative chromodomain. Chromosom Res. 2009;17:379–396. doi: 10.1007/s10577-009-9029-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wicker T, Sabot F, Hua-Van A, Bennetzen JL, Capy P, Chalhoub B, Flavell A, Leroy P, Organte M, Panaud O, et al. Reply: A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements should reflect their phylogeny. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:276–276. doi: 10.1038/nrg2165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

