Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Physiology logoLink to Journal of Applied Physiology
. 2018 Sep 1;125(3):970. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.zdg-2795-corr.2018

CORRIGENDUM

PMCID: PMC7654635  PMID: 30444679

Azevedo P, Bhammar DM, Babb TG, Bowen S, Witte KK, Rossiter HB, Brugniaux JV, Perry BD, Dantas de Lucas R, Turnes T, Sabino-Carvalho JL, Lopes TR, Zacca R, Fernandes RJ, McKie GL, Hazell TJ, Helal L, Donelli da Silveira A, McNulty CR, Roberg RA, Nightingale TE, Alrashidi AA, Mashkovskiy E, Krassioukov A, Clos P, Laroche D, Pageaux B, Poole DC, Jones AM, Schaun GZ, Santos de Souza D, de Oliveira Barreto Lopes T, Vagula M, Zuo L, Zhou T. Commentaries on Viewpoint: V̇o2peak is an acceptable estimate of cardiorespiratory fitness but not V̇o2max. J Appl Physiol (1985) 125: 233–240, 2018; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00319.2018.—Several commentaries were not included and have now been published: https://www.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2018.


Articles from Journal of Applied Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES