Skip to main content
Microbiology logoLink to Microbiology
. 2020 Jul 30;166(9):854–860. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000963

Activation of a [NiFe]-hydrogenase-4 isoenzyme by maturation proteases

Alexander J Finney 1,2, Grant Buchanan 2,3, Tracy Palmer 2,3, Sarah J Coulthurst 2, Frank Sargent 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC7654741  PMID: 32731905

Abstract

Maturation of [NiFe]-hydrogenases often involves specific proteases responsible for cleavage of the catalytic subunits. Escherichia coli HycI is the protease dedicated to maturation of the Hydrogenase-3 isoenzyme, a component of formate hydrogenlyase-1. In this work, it is demonstrated that a Pectobacterium atrosepticum HycI homologue, HyfK, is required for hydrogenase-4 activity, a component of formate hydrogenlyase-2, in that bacterium. The P. atrosepticum ΔhyfK mutant phenotype could be rescued by either P. atrosepticum hyfK or E. coli hycI on a plasmid. Conversely, an E. coli ΔhycI mutant was complemented by either E. coli hycI or P. atrosepticum hyfK in trans. E. coli is a rare example of a bacterium containing both hydrogenase-3 and hydrogenase-4, however the operon encoding hydrogenase-4 has no maturation protease gene. This work suggests HycI should be sufficient for maturation of both E. coli formate hydrogenlyases, however no formate hydrogenlyase-2 activity was detected in any E. coli strains tested here.

Keywords: Escherichia coli, Pectobacterium atrosepticum, formate hydrogenlyase, hydrogenase, maturase, protease

Full-Text

Hydrogenases are enzymes that are widespread in microbial systems where they catalyse the oxidation or production of molecular hydrogen (H2) [1]. A major class of hydrogenases common in Proteobacteria are the [NiFe]-hydrogenases that rely on an elaborate Ni-Fe-CO-2CN- metallocofactor at their active sites [1]. These two-part enzymes, consisting of a large subunit (~60 kDa) harbouring the [NiFe]-cofactor and a small subunit (~30 kDa) that contains iron-sulfur clusters, require the coordination of both specific and housekeeping biosynthetic pathways for their assembly and activation [2]. The biosynthesis pathway of the large subunit includes the critical final steps of cofactor assembly and insertion. Here, the HypA and HypB accessory proteins insert the nickel ion in to the large subunit as the final component of the [NiFe]-cofactor, where the HypA monomer interacts with the unstructured N-terminus and a C-terminal beta strand of the immature large subunit [3]. This novel interaction brings the HypA nickel binding site and immature hydrogenase large subunit active site in proximity to allow nickel transfer [3]. Next, and for the vast majority [NiFe]-hydrogenases, one final maturation step is required before small subunit docking and full enzymatic activation can occur. This is the proteolytic cleavage of a short stretch of polypeptide from the C-terminus of the hydrogenase large subunit [4].

Proteolytic maturation of hydrogenases is well understood for the model Escherichia coli [NiFe]-hydrogenase-3 isoenzyme (Hyd-3). Here, the Hyd-3 large subunit (encoded by the hycE gene) is cleaved after residue Arg-537 by a specific metallopeptidase termed HycI [5–8]. Removal of the 32-residue C-terminal ‘assembly peptide’ from HycE results in essentially irreversible cofactor-loading, correct folding of the large subunit and successful docking of the small subunit to generate the final active Hyd-3 [2]. Deletion of the hycI gene in E. coli led to the complete loss of all Hyd-3 activity and accumulation of an immature, unprocessed version of HycE [9]. Subsequent research in numerous other biological systems resulted in the central dogma that, where [NiFe]-hydrogenase large subunits were synthesized with a C-terminal extension or assembly peptide, that they would require processing by a specific protease for activation, and that said protease would be encoded close to the gene for the large subunit, and that said protease would not normally recognize any other hydrogenase homologues [4].

E. coli Hyd-3 is a member of the group 4A [NiFe]-hydrogenases [10] and a component of the formate hydrogenlyase-1 (FHL-1) complex [11]. It is encoded within the hycABCDEFGHI operon that includes the gene for the protease [6, 12]. Interestingly, laboratory strains of E. coli encode two separate group 4A [NiFe]-hydrogenases, each predicted to be part of distinct formate hydrogenlyase complexes. Thus in addition to Hyd-3, the E. coli [NiFe]-hydrogenase-4 isoenzyme (Hyd-4) is encoded by the hyfABCDEFGHIJR-focB operon [13] and is predicted to be a component of a formate hydrogenlyase-2 (FHL-2) complex [11]. FHL-1 and FHL-2 share the same core architecture, with FHL-2 predicted to contain extra membrane-embedded components [11]. FHL activity is normally maximal under fermentative conditions when the enzyme catalyses the oxidation of formic acid and couples this directly to the reduction of protons to molecular H2. Thus group 4A [NiFe]-hydrogenases have a physiological role in the evolution of hydrogen gas [11]. Directly demonstrating the enzymatic activity of E. coli FHL-2 or Hyd-4 has proven challenging. Under laboratory conditions, the enzyme appeared to be neither transcribed nor enzymatically active [14–16], although there is some evidence for a physiological role in H2 metabolism under some specific environmental conditions [17, 18]. In addition, disruption of Hyd-4 genes alone did not affect overall H2 production by E. coli [19, 20], again indicating that cellular Hyd-4 activity was very low or absent under the conditions tested. It is also clear that the E. coli hyfABCDEFGHIJR-focB operon does not encode any homologue of HycI (Fig. 1a) nor any other protease [2, 13]. Therefore, while the large subunit of Hyd-4 (HyfG) shares a high degree of sequence identity with HycE including the presence of a 32-residue C-terminal assembly peptide (Fig. 1b), it must also be considered that the apparent low activity of Hyd-4 may stem from incomplete maturation of the enzyme.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The genetics of processing group 4A [NiFe]-hydrogenases (a) Schematic showing the genetic organization of E. coli K-12 hyc and hyf operons as well as P. atrosepticum SCRI1043 hyf operon. Gene products are indicated in the legend and colour coded. (Top) The E. coli K-12 hycABCDEFGHI operon comprises genes ECK2720-ECK2712. (Middle) The E. coli K-12 hyfABCDEFGHIJRfocB operon comprises genes ECK2477-ECK2488. (Bottom) The P. atrospecticum (formerly Erwinia carotovora ) hyfABCDEFGHIJK-hyfR cluster comprises genes ECA1247-ECA1236. The hycI- or hyfK-like genes are highlighted in red. (b) A sequence alignment of the final 93 amino acids, including the proteolytically processed assembly peptides, of HycEEc, HyfGEc and HyfGPa with black to white shading showing most to least conserved residue positions. Sequence alignment was performed using Clustal [45] and presented using BOXSHADE (http://sourceforge.net/projects/boxshade/). (c) The hydrogenase hybrid ('HYD-BRID') C-terminal sequence of the ϕHyfG-HycEEc construct introduced into E. coli FTE001, FTE002, FTE004 and FTE007 strains (Table 1). The sequence coloured black corresponds to the relevant part of the E. coli HyfG protein, and the sequence shaded green is the terminal arginine of the mature enzyme and the C-terminal assembly peptide of E. coli HycE. (d) A phylogenetic tree of all group 4A [NiFe]-hydrogenase-associated endopeptidases. Homologues were identified using blast [46] before multiple sequence alignment was carried out in Jalview [47]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using FigTree (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). Dark blue and yellow colouring highlight those organisms with maturation protease genes associated with hyf and hyc type group 4A subtypes, respectively. Purple and cyan colouring shows organisms with an additional removal or variation in position of the hyfD gene, respectively (occurs within the hyf type only). Red colouring highlights organisms with both hyc and hyf operons (but note that these harbour only one maturation protease gene within their hyc operons). Note that this sequence analysis identified a HyfK homologue in Trabulsiella guaensis, which produces a functional Hyd-4 [29].

In this work, we set out to test the initial hypotheses that the E. coli hyf operon is not sufficiently expressed, and that HyfG is not correctly processed, such that a hydrogenase-null phenotype is observed. To do this we took a recombineering approach and constructed 15 new strains (Table 1 and Supplementary Material, available in the online version of this article) with alternative promoters and/or ϕhyfG::hycE fusion alleles at the native hyf locus on the chromosome. None of the new strains displayed any Hyd-4 activity (Table 1). Briefly, a group of E. coli strains with modified hyf transcriptional promoter regions were generated using P1 phage transduction [21] and allelic exchange [22]. All engineering was carried out in single copy on the chromosome, and the strains’ ability to produce H2 gas under fermentative conditions was assayed by gas chromatography [23]. Initially, an E. coli K-12 strain (MG056G1, Table 1) was constructed based on the MG1655 parent strain [24] but encoding an internal 10-His tag between residues Gly-85 and Ala-86 within the HyfG protein. The rationale here was that a similarly modified version of HycE (Hyd-3) had retained full activity [25] and that the tag would allow further characterization of Hyd-4 at the protein level if the promoter engineering were successful. Next, the MG056G1 strain was further modified to replace the native hyf promoter region with that from the E. coli hyc operon encoding Hyd-3. This new strain (AF01, Table 1) was then extensively modified, first with the genetic removal of hydrogenase-3 activity (resulting in strains AF02 and AF03, Table 1), then by the additional deletion of the gene encoding the hydrogenase-1 catalytic subunit (yielding strains AF04 and AF06, Table 1). Culturing of all of these strains in triplicate 5 ml Lysogeny Broth (LB) supplemented with 0.8 % (w/v) glucose in sealed Hungate tubes for 16 h at 37 °C demonstrated that replacement of the hyf promoter region with that of hyc did not result in detectible H2 production from Hyd-4 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Rational engineering of the E. coli hyf operon does not induce H2 production

E. coli K-12 strain

Relevant genotype

Source

H2 production

MG1655

F-, λ-, rph-1

[24]

Positive

MG056G1

as MG1655, hyfG His

This Work

Positive

AF01

as MG1655, hyfG His, Phyc::hyfA

This Work

Positive

AF02

as MG1655, hyfG His, Phyc::hyfA, ΔhycA-I:: KanR

This Work

Negative

AF03

as MG1655, hyfG His, Phyc::hyfA, ΔhycA-I

This Work

Negative

AF04

as MG1655, hyfG His, Phyc::hyfA, ΔhycA-I, ΔhyaB::KanR

This Work

Negative

AF06

as MG1655, hyfG His, Phyc::hyfA, ΔhycA-I,ΔhyaB

This Work

Negative

FTE001

as MG1655, hyfG His, Phyc::hyfA, ΔhycA-I,

ϕhyfG (nt 1–1569)::hycE (nt 1611–1707)

This Work

Negative

MG059e1

as MG1655, hycE His

[25]

Positive

MGE1dI

as MG1655, hycE His, ΔhycI

This Work

Negative

MC4100

F, araD139, Δ(argF-lac)169, λ, e14, flhD5301, Δ(fruK-yeiR)725(fruA25), relA1, rpsL150(StrR), rbsR22, Δ(fimB-fimE)632(::IS1), deoC1

[27]

Positive

FTD147

as MC4100, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE

[16]

Negative

AF05

as MC4100, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE, Phyc::hyfA

This Work

Negative

FTE002

as MC4100, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE, Phyc::hyfA,

ϕhyfG (nt 1–1569)::hycE (nt 1611–1707)

This Work

Negative

FTE003

as MC4100, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE, PT5::hyfA

This Work

Negative

FTE004

as MC4100, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE, PT5::hyfA,

ϕhyfG (nt 1–1569)::hycE (nt 1611–1707)

This Work

Negative

FTE005

as MC4100, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE, PT5::hyfA, hyfG His

This Work

Negative

FTE006

as MC4100, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE, PT5::hyfA, hyfG His, ϕhyfG (nt 1–1569)::hycE (nt 1611–1707)

This Work

Negative

FTE007

as MC4100, ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE,

ϕhyfG (nt 1–1569)::hycE (nt 1611–1707)

This Work

Negative

*E. coli strains were grown under anaerobic fermentative conditions in LB medium supplemented with 0.8 % (w/v) d-glucose at 37 °C for 16 h. Production of molecular H2 in the culture headspace was determined by gas chromatography. Hungate tube headspace gas was injected into a 500 µl loop and separated through a 5A molecular packed column before thermal conductivity detection. A hydrogen standard curve was generated using N2:H2 mixes [23].

LB, Lysogeny Broth.

Next, an alternative E. coli K-12 parental strain (based on MC4100 [26, 27]) was tested. The E. coli FTD147 strain (deleted for the genes encoding the catalytic subunits of Hyd-1, -2 and -3 [16]) was modified by replacement of the native hyf promoter with that of the strong T5 promoter from the pQE plasmid series (yielding strain FTE003, Table 1). Growth of this strain under fermentative conditions did not result in any detectible H2 production from Hyd-4 (Table 1).

Finally, it was considered that potential problems with HyfG processing could be leading to synthesis of an immature, inactive Hyd-4. This hypothesis is based on the fact that the hyf operon encodes no specific maturation protease and the reasonable possibility that HycI might not recognize HyfG as a substrate. In order to test this hypothesis, with the aim of forcing HycI to recognize and activate HyfG, a series of strains were carefully constructed where the C-terminal assembly peptide of HycE was added to the mature sequence of HyfG (Table 1, Fig. 1c). Careful genetic engineering generated a ϕhyfG::hycE fusion sequence that would comprise the first 1569 nucleotides of hyfG precisely in-frame with hycE nucleotides 1611–1707 and retaining the ribosome binding site and initiation codon on the downstream hyfH gene to mitigate against potential polar effects. The resulting protein sequence is shown in Fig. 1c. This construct was transferred to the chromosome of a number of promoter-engineered strains (note that these all remain hycI +) using the technique of homologous recombination [22]. No H2 production from Hyd-4 was detected in any of the engineered large subunit fusion strains (Table 1). Taken altogether, the strain-engineering experiments suggest that additional, unknown, biosynthetic problems are hindering assembly of E. coli Hyd-4.

Clearly, making progress in the understanding the biochemistry of Hyd-4-like enzymes requires an alternative model system. Recently, group 4A [NiFe]-hydrogenases from Pectobacterium atrosepticum [28], Trabulsiella guaensis [29], Sulfurospirillum multivorans [30], Campylobacter concisus [31] and Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius [32] have been identified as possible candidates for study of this [NiFe]-hydrogenase group. Our sequence analysis suggests that genetic loci encoding each of these ‘hyf-type’ enzymes contained a hycI-like gene (Fig. 1d). Indeed, bioinformatic analysis of group 4A hydrogenases revealed only four organisms that encode both a Hyd-3 and Hyd-4 orthologue within their respective genomes: Escherichia coli; Shimwellia blattae; Hafnia alvei; and Koskonia radicincitans [11, 33]. In every case only one endopeptidase gene is found within the hyc-like operons, and none could be identified within the hyf-like operons (Fig. 1d, organisms linked by the red line). This suggests that a single HycI-like protease may be sufficient for Hyd-4 biosynthesis, given that a second copy is never conserved.

P. atrosepticum SCRI1043 is a γ-Proteobacterium that contains an active FHL-2 and Hyd-4 encoded by a hyf operon (Fig. 1a), but no FHL-1 or Hyd-3 isoenzyme [28]. Unlike the E. coli hyf operon, the P. atrosepticum SCRI1043 hyf operon encodes HyfK (HyfKPa, Fig. 1a), which shares 74 % overall sequence identity with E. coli HycI (HycIEc). Due to this sequence similarity it was considered that these endopeptidases could be tested for their ability to activate either the Hyd-3-type and the Hyd-4-type hydrogenase. To begin, both hycIEc and hyfKPa genes were cloned separately in to pQE80L (AmpR) expression vectors using standard PCR and molecular cloning techniques. Both plasmids, and a vector control, were used to transform the E. coli ΔhycI strain MGE1dI (Table 1). E. coli MGE1dI is based on MG059e1 (as MG1655, hycE His [25]) but carries an unmarked in-frame deletion in hycI. The transformed E. coli strains were grown in triplicate 5 ml LB 0.2 % (w/v) formate cultures, with or without addition of 1 mM IPTG, anaerobically in sealed Hungate tubes, for 24 h at 37 °C, before GC analysis of the culture headspace. The MGE1dI (ΔhycI) strain of E. coli , containing empty vector control, displayed no physiological FHL-1 activity and did not evolve H2 gas under fermentative conditions (Fig. 2a). However, incorporation of either hycIEc or hyfKPa in the E. coli ΔhycI strain rescued H2 production (Fig. 2a). These data demonstrate that the hyfKPa gene product can facilitate the maturation of the E. coli Hyd-3 enzyme.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

P. atrosepticum HyfK can activate E. coli Hyd-3, and E. coli HycI can activate P. atrosepticum Hyd-4. (a) E. coli strains MC4100 (FHL-1+) and MGE1dI (ΔhycI) were transformed separately with plasmids harbouring hycIEc, hyfKPba or a vector control (pQE80). Strains were grown anaerobically in LB medium supplemented with 0.2 % (w/v) formate, ampicillin and 1 mM IPTG where indicated (+) for 24 h at 37 °C. (b) P. atrosepticum strains PH002 (ΔhybC, FHL-2+) and PH006 (ΔhybC, ΔhyfK) were transformed with plasmids containing hycIEc, hyfKPba or pQE80. Strains were grown anaerobically in low-salt LB (LSLB) medium supplemented with ampicillin and 1 mM IPTG where indicated (+) for 48 h at 24 °C. (c) E. coli strains MGE1dI (ΔhycI), FTE003 (ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE, PT5::hyfA) and FTE004 (ΔhyaB, ΔhybC, ΔhycE, PT5::hyfA, ϕhyfG::hycE) were transformed with plasmids containing hycIEc, hyfKPba or a vector control (pQE80). Strains were grown anaerobically in LB medium supplemented with 0.8 % (w/v) glucose, ampicillin and 1 mM IPTG for 16 h at 37 °C. In all cases, H2 headspace samples were extracted and analysed by gas chromatography (Shimadzu GC2014 using a 5A molecular packed column with thermal conductivity detection). Data was normalized by OD600 and culture volume. Error bars represent sd (n=3).

To study the role of maturation proteases in the activation of Hyd-4/FHL-2, P. atrosepticum SCRI1043, which contains active FHL-2, was studied [28]. First, a genetic approach was taken to assess the role of hyfK in hydrogen production. A P. atrosepticum double-mutant strain was constructed, using an allele exchange protocol [28], which carried both ΔhybC and ΔhyfK in-frame deletions (PH006, Table 2 and Supplementary Material). The ΔhybC deletion removes all Hyd-2 activity leaving Hyd-4 as the only active hydrogenase in the bacterium [28]. Next, the P. atrosepticum ΔhybC ΔhyfK double-mutant (PH006), together with the P. atrosepticum PH002 parent strain (ΔhybC only), were separately transformed with the pQE80 plasmids containing either hycIEc or hyfKPa, or the empty vector as a control. The transformed P. atrosepticum strains were then grown in triplicate 5 ml low salt LB cultures (5 g l−1 NaCl as opposed to the commonly used 10 g l−1), with or without addition of 1 mM IPTG, in sealed Hungate tubes, fermentatively for 48 h at 24 °C, before GC analysis of the headspace gases. The P. atrosepticum PH002 parent strain (ΔhybC) was able to generate H2 gas under all conditions (Fig. 2b). However, the ΔhybC ΔhyfK double-mutant was incapable of producing any H2 gas in this experiment when carrying an empty vector (Fig. 2b). This shows the hyfKPa protease gene is essential for FHL-2 and Hyd-4 activity in P. atrosepticum SCRI1043. Moreover, the P. atrosepticum ΔhybC ΔhyfK double-mutant strain was clearly rescued for H2 production by inclusion of either hycIEc or hyfKPa (Fig. 2b). These data demonstrate that Hyd-4 isoenzymes do require a maturation step for successful biosynthesis and they also suggest that, in the rare cases where an organism has the capability to produce both FHL-1 and FHL-2, that a single copy of hycI should be sufficient for this task.

Table 2.

Mutagenesis of the P. atrosepticum hyf operon

P. atrsosepticum strain

Relevant genotype

Source

H2 production

SCRI1043

wild-type

[48]

Positive

PH002

as SCRI1043, ΔhybC

[28]

Positive

PH006

as SCRI1043, ΔhybC, ΔhyfK

This Work

Negative

*P. atrosepticum strains were grown under anaerobic fermentative conditions in low salt (LS) LB medium supplemented with 0.8 % (w/v) d-glucose at 24 °C for 48 h. Production of molecular H2 in the culture headspace was determined by GC [28]

GC, Gas Chromatography; LB, Lysogeny Broth; LSLB, Low Salt Lysogeny Broth.

This compatibility of HycIEc and HyfKPa for activation of either E. coli Hyd-3 or P. atrosepticum Hyd-4 points strongly towards the idea that E. coli HycI should be capable of maturation of the endogenous Hyd-4 found in E. coli . In one final attempt to observe Hyd-4 activity in E. coli , the hycIEc and hyfKPa encoding plasmids, and a vector control, were each used to transform the E. coli FTE003 and FTE004 strains encoding the HyfG::HycE fusion proteins (Table 1). All strains were grown in triplicate 5 ml LB 0.8 % (w/v) glucose cultures, with addition of 1 mM IPTG, in sealed Hungate tubes, for 16 h at 37 °C, before GC analysis. Hydrogen production was only detected in the control strains (Fig. 2c), demonstrating that cellular levels of a maturation protease is not the sole factor limiting Hyd-4 activity in E. coli .

This work presents the first demonstration of cross-species complementation by hydrogenase maturation endopeptidases, highlighting the close evolutionary relationship between group 4 [NiFe]-hydrogenases and demonstrating the critical importance of the HycI-type protease in the biosynthesis of these enzymes. These data are in line with studies showing a endopeptidase for a group 1D hydrogenase was able to activate a different group 1D enzyme within the same organism ( Salmonella enterica ) [34], and one endopeptidase was able to activate both a group 3B hydrogenase and group 4D hydrogenase within the same organism ( Thermococcus kodakarensis ) [35].

Though the proteolytic maturation schedule for [NiFe]-hydrogenases is now dogma, there are known and emerging variations on the canonical pathway for large subunit biosynthesis. Protelolytic processing is not required for all [NiFe]-hydrogenases, such as examples of the H2-sensing, Ech- and CODH-linked hydrogenases [36–39]. Indeed, recent genetic engineering work showed that removal of the C-terminal assembly peptide from the membrane bound hydrogenase (MBH) in Cupriavidus necator ( Ralstonia eutropha ) did not disrupt cofactor insertion and resulted in no loss of hydrogenase-specific activity [40]. Given that in S. enterica a maturation protease was found to retain the ability to recognize and bind to a large subunit completely lacking the maturation peptide [34], perhaps it should be considered that the maturation protease has a role in hydrogenase biosynthesis beyond the simple cleavage of the C-terminal extension. This could certainly be tested in the C. necator system [40] by deleting the gene encoding the processing protease (HoxM [41]) in the stain already lacking the hydrogenase assembly peptide and observing any changes to hydrogenase activity.

It is becoming increasingly clear that the C-terminal assembly peptide may not be the key recognition motif for the protease [34, 42]. Early work showed that swapping of the E. coli HycE (Hyd-3) assembly peptide for that of HybC (Hyd-2) led to a ‘dead-end’ fusion protein that could not be processed by any maturation protease tested [43]. While more recently, swapping the HybC (Hyd-2) assembly peptide for that of HyaB (Hyd-1) did not lead to any changes in the requirement for the Hyd-2-specific protease (HybC) for maturation [42, 44].

In conclusion, this work has demonstrated that group 4 [NiFe]-hydrogenases require a functional hycI-like accessory gene for correct biosynthesis. A model bacterium ( P. atrosepticum SCRI1043), which contains an active Hyd-4 and FHL-2 as the only formate hydrogenlyase activity, required the presence of the native hyfK gene product for maturation. The E. coli hycI gene could substitute for P. atrosepticum hyfK if supplied on a plasmid, providing an explanation of why it is that in rare examples of organisms that contain both an FHL-1 and an FHL-2 only one copy of a hycI-like gene is conserved.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1

Funding information

This research was funded primarily by the BBSRC through award of a four‐year EASTBIO PhD studentship to AJF (#1510231). SJC is a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellow, and TP is a Wellcome Trust Investigator.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Jennifer S. McDowall for construction of the E. coli strain MGE1dI. We are much obliged to Dr Magali Roger and Mr Tom Reed for helpful discussion and advice.

Author contributions

AJF performed research, analysed data, prepared figures for publication, and wrote the paper. GB and TP performed research. SJC and FS supervised the research. FS conceived the study and wrote the paper.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts to declare.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: GC, gas chromatography; LB, Lysogeny Broth; LSLB, Low Salt Lysogeny Broth.

Supplementary Material is available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Lubitz W, Ogata H, Rüdiger O, Reijerse E. Hydrogenases. Chem Rev. 2014;114:4081–4148. doi: 10.1021/cr4005814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sargent F. The Model [NiFe]-Hydrogenases of Escherichia coli . Adv Microb Physiol. 2016;68:433–507. doi: 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2016.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kwon S, Watanabe S, Nishitani Y, Kawashima T, Kanai T, et al. Crystal structures of a [NiFe] hydrogenase large subunit HyhL in an immature state in complex with a Ni chaperone HypA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:7045–7050. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801955115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Böck A, King PW, Blokesch M, Posewitz MC. Maturation of hydrogenases. Adv Microb Physiol. 2006;51:1–71. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(06)51001-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rossmann R, Sauter M, Lottspeich F, Böck A. Maturation of the large subunit (HYCE) of Escherichia coli hydrogenase 3 requires nickel incorporation followed by C-terminal processing at Arg537. Eur J Biochem. 1994;220:377–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18634.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rossmann R, Maier T, Lottspeich F, Böck A. Characterisation of a protease from Escherichia coli involved in hydrogenase maturation. Eur J Biochem. 1995;227:545–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20422.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang F, Hu W, Xu H, Li C, Xia B, et al. Solution structure and backbone dynamics of an endopeptidase HycI from Escherichia coli: implications for mechanism of the [NiFe] hydrogenase maturation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:3856–3863. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609263200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kumarevel T, Tanaka T, Bessho Y, Shinkai A, Yokoyama S. Crystal structure of hydrogenase maturating endopeptidase HycI from Escherichia coli . Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;389:310–314. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.08.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Binder U, Maier T, Böck A. Nickel incorporation into hydrogenase 3 from Escherichia coli requires the precursor form of the large subunit. Arch Microbiol. 1996;165:69–72. doi: 10.1007/s002030050299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Greening C, Biswas A, Carere CR, Jackson CJ, Taylor MC, et al. Genomic and metagenomic surveys of hydrogenase distribution indicate H2 is a widely utilised energy source for microbial growth and survival. Isme J. 2016;10:761–777. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Finney AJ, Sargent F. Formate hydrogenlyase: a group 4 [NiFe]-hydrogenase in tandem with a formate dehydrogenase. Adv Microb Physiol. 2019;74:465–486. doi: 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2019.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Böhm R, Sauter M, Böck A. Nucleotide sequence and expression of an operon in Escherichia coli coding for formate hydrogenlyase components. Mol Microbiol. 1990;4:231–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00590.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Andrews SC, Berks BC, McClay J, Ambler A, Quail MA, et al. A 12-cistron Escherichia coli operon (hyf) encoding a putative proton-translocating formate hydrogenlyase system. Microbiology. 1997;143 (Pt 11):3633–3647. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-11-3633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Skibinski DAG, Golby P, Chang Y-S, Sargent F, Hoffman R, et al. Regulation of the hydrogenase-4 operon of Escherichia coli by the sigma(54)-dependent transcriptional activators FhlA and HyfR. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:6642–6653. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.23.6642-6653.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Self WT, Hasona A, Shanmugam KT. Expression and regulation of a silent operon, hyf, coding for hydrogenase 4 isoenzyme in Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol. 2004;186:580–587. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.2.580-587.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Redwood MD, Mikheenko IP, Sargent F, Macaskie LE. Dissecting the roles of Escherichia coli hydrogenases in biohydrogen production. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;278:48–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00966.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Trchounian K, Poladyan A, Vassilian A, Trchounian A. Multiple and reversible hydrogenases for hydrogen production by Escherichia coli: dependence on fermentation substrate, pH and the F(0)F(1)-ATPase. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2012;47:236–249. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2012.655375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bagramyan K, Vassilian A, Mnatsakanyan N, Trchounian A. Participation of hyf-encoded hydrogenase 4 in molecular hydrogen release coupled with proton-potassium exchange in Escherichia coli . Membr Cell Biol. 2001;14:749–763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sanchez-Torres V, Maeda T, Wood TK. Protein engineering of the transcriptional activator FHLA to enhance hydrogen production in Escherichia coli . Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:5639–5646. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00638-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lacasse MJ, Sebastiampillai S, Côté J-P, Hodkinson N, Brown ED, et al. A whole-cell, high-throughput hydrogenase assay to identify factors that modulate [NiFe]-hydrogenase activity. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:15373–15385. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.008101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Miller JH. Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hamilton CM, Aldea M, Washburn BK, Babitzke P, Kushner SR. New method for generating deletions and gene replacements in Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol. 1989;171:4617–4622. doi: 10.1128/JB.171.9.4617-4622.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pinske C, Sargent F. Exploring the directionality of Escherichia coli formate hydrogenlyase: a membrane-bound enzyme capable of fixing carbon dioxide to organic acid. Microbiology Open. 2016;5:721–737. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Blattner FR, Plunkett G, Bloch CA, Perna NT, Burland V, et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 1997;277:1453–1462. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5331.1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McDowall JS, Murphy BJ, Haumann M, Palmer T, Armstrong FA, et al. Bacterial formate hydrogenlyase complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E3948–E3956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407927111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Peters JE, Thate TE, Craig NL. Definition of the Escherichia coli MC4100 genome by use of a DNA array. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:2017–2021. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.6.2017-2021.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Casadaban MJ, Cohen SN. Lactose genes fused to exogenous promoters in one step using a Mu-lac bacteriophage: in vivo probe for transcriptional control sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:4530–4533. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Finney AJ, Lowden R, Fleszar M, Albareda M, Coulthurst SJ, et al. The plant pathogen Pectobacterium atrosepticum contains a functional formate hydrogenlyase-2 complex. Mol Microbiol. 2019;112:1440–1452. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lindenstrauß U, Pinske C. Dissection of the hydrogen metabolism of the enterobacterium Trabulsiella guamensis: identification of a formate-dependent and essential formate hydrogenlyase complex exhibiting phylogenetic similarity to complex I. J Bacteriol. 2019;201:e00160-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00160-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kruse S, Goris T, Wolf M, Wei X, Diekert G. The [NiFe] hydrogenases of the tetrachloroethene-respiring Epsilonproteobacterium Sulfurospirillum multivorans: biochemical studies and transcription analysis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:444. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Benoit SL, Maier RJ. Site-directed mutagenesis of Campylobacter concisus respiratory genes provides insight into the pathogen's growth requirements. Sci Rep. 2018;8:14203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32509-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mohr T, Aliyu H, Küchlin R, Zwick M, Cowan D, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius strains with distinct hydrogenogenic capacities. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:880. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5302-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Søndergaard D, Pedersen CNS, Greening C. HydDB: a web tool for hydrogenase classification and analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34212. doi: 10.1038/srep34212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Albareda M, Buchanan G, Sargent F. Identification of a stable complex between a [NiFe]-hydrogenase catalytic subunit and its maturation protease. FEBS Lett. 2017;591:338–347. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kanai T, Yasukochi A, Simons J-R, Scott JW, Fukuda W, et al. Genetic analyses of the functions of [NiFe]-hydrogenase maturation endopeptidases in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis . Extremophiles. 2017;21:27–39. doi: 10.1007/s00792-016-0875-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fox JD, He Y, Shelver D, Roberts GP, Ludden PW. Characterization of the region encoding the CO-induced hydrogenase of Rhodospirillum rubrum . J Bacteriol. 1996;178:6200–6208. doi: 10.1128/JB.178.21.6200-6208.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Künkel A, Vorholt JA, Thauer RK, Hedderich R. An Escherichia coli hydrogenase-3-type hydrogenase in methanogenic archaea. Eur J Biochem. 1998;252:467–476. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2520467.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vignais PM, Billoud B. Occurrence, classification, and biological function of hydrogenases: an overview. Chem Rev. 2007;107:4206–4272. doi: 10.1021/cr050196r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kleihues L, Lenz O, Bernhard M, Buhrke T, Friedrich B. The H(2) sensor of Ralstonia eutropha is a member of the subclass of regulatory [NiFe] hydrogenases. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:2716–2724. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.10.2716-2724.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hartmann S, Frielingsdorf S, Caserta G, Lenz O. A membrane‐bound [NiFe]‐hydrogenase large subunit precursor whose C‐terminal extension is not essential for cofactor incorporation but guarantees optimal maturation. Microbiology Open. 2020;9:e1029–1206. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bernhard M, Schwartz E, Rietdorf J, Friedrich B. The Alcaligenes eutrophus membrane-bound hydrogenase gene locus encodes functions involved in maturation and electron transport coupling. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:4522–4529. doi: 10.1128/JB.178.15.4522-4529.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pinske C, Thomas C, Nutschan K, Sawers RG. Delimiting the function of the C-terminal extension of the Escherichia coli [NiFe]-Hydrogenase 2 large subunit precursor. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2223. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Theodoratou E, Paschos A, Böck A. Analysis of the cleavage site specificity of the endopeptidase involved in the maturation of the large subunit of hydrogenase 3 from Escherichia coli . Arch Microbiol. 2000;173:110–116. doi: 10.1007/s002039900116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Thomas C, Muhr E, Sawers RG. Coordination of synthesis and assembly of a modular membrane-associated [NiFe]-hydrogenase Is determined by cleavage of the C-terminal peptide. J Bacteriol. 2015;197:2989–2998. doi: 10.1128/JB.00437-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview Version 2: a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–1191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bell KS, Sebaihia M, Pritchard L, Holden MTG, Hyman LJ, et al. Genome sequence of the enterobacterial phytopathogen Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica and characterization of virulence factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:11105–11110. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402424101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Articles from Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES