Skip to main content
PLOS Biology logoLink to PLOS Biology
. 2020 Nov 10;18(11):e3000885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000885

NOX5-induced uncoupling of endothelial NO synthase is a causal mechanism and theragnostic target of an age-related hypertension endotype

Mahmoud H Elbatreek 1,2,*, Sepideh Sadegh 3, Elisa Anastasi 4, Emre Guney 1,5, Cristian Nogales 1, Tim Kacprowski 3,6, Ahmed A Hassan 1, Andreas Teubner 7, Po-Hsun Huang 8,9, Chien-Yi Hsu 10,11, Paul M H Schiffers 12, Ger M Janssen 12, Pamela W M Kleikers 1, Anil Wipat 4, Jan Baumbach 3,13, Jo G R De Mey 1, Harald H H W Schmidt 1,*
Editor: Cecilia W Lo14
PMCID: PMC7654809  PMID: 33170835

Abstract

Hypertension is the most important cause of death and disability in the elderly. In 9 out of 10 cases, the molecular cause, however, is unknown. One mechanistic hypothesis involves impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation through reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation. Indeed, ROS forming NADPH oxidase (Nox) genes associate with hypertension, yet target validation has been negative. We re-investigate this association by molecular network analysis and identify NOX5, not present in rodents, as a sole neighbor to human vasodilatory endothelial nitric oxide (NO) signaling. In hypertensive patients, endothelial microparticles indeed contained higher levels of NOX5—but not NOX1, NOX2, or NOX4—with a bimodal distribution correlating with disease severity. Mechanistically, mice expressing human Nox5 in endothelial cells developed—upon aging—severe systolic hypertension and impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation due to uncoupled NO synthase (NOS). We conclude that NOX5-induced uncoupling of endothelial NOS is a causal mechanism and theragnostic target of an age-related hypertension endotype. Nox5 knock-in (KI) mice represent the first mechanism-based animal model of hypertension.


The causes of hypertension are not understood; treatments are symptomatic and prevent only few of the associated risks. This study applies network medicine to identify a subgroup of patients with NADPH oxidase 5-induced uncoupling of nitric oxide synthase as the cause of age-related hypertension, enabling a first-in-class mechanism-based treatment of hypertension.

Introduction

Hypertension is of major medical relevance as a risk factor for myocardial infarction, stroke, and other chronic conditions and death [1]. Except for 5% of patients with secondary hypertension (due to renal artery stenosis, adrenal adenomas, pheochromocytomas, and numerous single-gene mutations involving renal transporters [2]), the cause of hypertension remains unknown in the remaining 95% of all cases. In these cases of so-called ‘essential hypertension,’ treatments have to focus on symptomatic vasodilatory drug therapy and lifestyle management. Even this symptomatic antihypertensive therapy is sometimes ineffective, i.e., in treatment-resistant hypertension, and requires a high number to treat, with many patients still experiencing adverse outcomes such as stroke and myocardial infarction [3].

One molecular mechanism of hypertension that has been suggested for decades is oxidative stress, i.e., an unphysiological production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in blood vessels interferes with vasodilation by the endothelium-derived relaxing factor, nitric oxide (NO) [4]. No hypertension-relevant cellular source of ROS, however, has been identified to either prove this hypothesis or exploit it for a mechanism-based or even curative clinical therapy.

Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [5] in search of hypertension risk genes point towards NADPH oxidases (Nox), the only known enzyme family dedicated to ROS formation, in particular the genes Nox4 and Nox5. This matches preclinical studies, excluding other vascular NOX isoforms, i.e., NOX1 and NOX2, for causing hypertension, unless animals are infused with pro-hypertensive agents [68]. Mice overexpressing p22phox (an essential component of NOX 1–4) or lacking the antioxidant extracellular superoxide dismutase (ecSOD) in the vasculature develop hypertension upon ageing [9]. Thus, the data regarding the role of NOX1 and NOX2 regarding preclinical hypertension are controversial and suggest that these isoforms may contribute to basal blood pressure regulation but not hypertension [6, 8, 10, 11]. With respect to NOX4, this isoform is widely expressed, but it appears irrelevant for blood pressure or hypertension [12] and is rather vasoprotective [13]. Regarding NOX5, this enzyme is physiologically expressed in vascular endothelial cells of human blood vessels and may be associated with diabetic nephropathy [1416]; mice expressing human Nox5 in vascular smooth muscle cells are, however, normotensive [17]. Thus, the role of NOX5 in hypertension is unclear.

Network medicine [18] predicts that, for most particularly complex diseases, not a single protein but protein modules, i.e., sub-graphs of the interactome, are in fact relevant [1921]. Therefore, we set out to re-investigate the association of NOX with hypertension and NO-dependent vasodilation using 3 complementing unbiased in silico approaches and to validate any prediction both in mice and—if possible—also human patient samples.

Results

NOX5 is the only direct neighbor of endothelial NO-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) signaling

To explore the possible link between NOX isoforms and hypertension and NO-dependent vasodilation, we constructed a pruned molecular subnetwork from the first neighbors of NOX family members and NO-cGMP-related proteins as seed nodes in the experimentally validated interactome obtained from the IID [22] interactome database. These included NOX1, NOX4, NOX5, NO synthase 1 (NOS1), NOS3, soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) alpha-1 (GCYA1), sGC alpha-2 (GCYA2), sGC beta-1 (GCYB1), phosphodiesterase 5A (PDE5A), PDE9A, and cGMP-dependent protein kinase 1 (KGP1), but not NOX2 and NOS2. The resulting subnetwork was further pruned according to the subnetwork-participation-degree (SPD) to correct for hub nodes (i.e., proteins that occurred mainly because of their high number of interactions in the whole network). This resulted in a disease module consisting of several connected components, which revealed that all NOX isoforms but NOX5 were excluded as a close neighbor of endothelial NO-cGMP signaling. NOX5 fell into the same connected component with the subunits of the NO receptor, GCYA1, GCYA2, and GCYB1, and with endothelial NOS (NOS3) (Fig 1A). From IID, this connection is based on a physical interaction suggested by high-throughput affinity chromatography [23].

Fig 1. Identification of NOX5 as direct neighbor of endothelial NO-cGMP signaling and clinical validation in hypertension.

Fig 1

(A) NOX module was constructed by first neighbor subnetwork pruned based on SPD (the middle panel) where NOX isoforms (red nodes) and NO-cGMP related proteins (green nodes) were used as seed nodes. The resulting NOX module was confirmed with 2 disease module identification methods, global modularity optimization (the left panel) and the agglomerative local method (the right panel). All the methods identified NOX5 as the closest link to NO-cGMP signaling and excluded NOX1–4. (B) NOX5 levels in endothelial microparticles (MPs) isolated from plasma of NT, normoalbuminuric individuals and HT normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric patients were measured by ELISA. (C) NOX5 levels were increased in HT patients with normoalbuminuria (n = 20) compared to NT individuals (n = 10). NOX5 levels were even higher in HT patients with microalbuminuria (n = 20). Comparison between groups was done by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (D) Subgroup analysis of all HT patients shows a bimodal distribution (p = 0.0007, two-tailed F-test, adjusted r2 = 0.9973), where only the right but not the left subgroup peak of HT patients has NOX5 levels that are significantly different from the healthy individuals. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n independent experiments *p = 0.014, ***p = 0.0003. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file. cGMP, cyclic GMP; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; GCYA, soluble guanylate cyclase alpha; GCYB, soluble guanylate cyclase beta; HT, hypertensive; KGP1, cGMP-dependent protein kinase 1; MP, microparticle; NO, nitric oxide; NOS, NO synthase; NOX, NADPH oxidase; NT, normotensive; PDE, phosphodiesterase; SPD, subnetwork-participation-degree.

To cross-check our in silico findings of a NOX disease module, we employed 2 additional computational network module identification methods, global modularity optimization and agglomerative local search, both of which have been top performers in the recent Module Identification DREAM Challenge [24]. In brief, the global modularity optimization approach combines multiple module detection algorithms to avoid suboptimal partitions resulting from individual algorithms [25]. The agglomerative local method uses the Speed and Performance In Clustering (SPICi) algorithm [26] to optimize the local density of modules around seed nodes. With all 3 in silico methods, we reached the same conclusion: exclusion of all NOXs, except NOX5, as a direct neighbor of endothelial NO-cGMP signaling (Fig 1A).

NOX5 protein levels are increased in hypertensive patients

To test this causal endothelial NOX5 hypothesis for human hypertension, we enrolled consecutive outpatients with essential hypertension and a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Study participants were divided into 3 groups, healthy (n = 10), hypertensive patients with normoalbuminuria (n = 20), and hypertensive patients with moderately increased albuminuria (previously termed microalbuminuria) (n = 20). The baseline characteristics of the patients are listed in Table 1. To measure NOX5 protein levels, circulating endothelial microparticles, i.e., membrane vesicles that are released from endothelial cells upon cellular activation or cell death and that carry endothelial proteins [27], were isolated from plasma of the participants (Fig 1B). We observed higher NOX5 protein levels in endothelial microparticles of hypertensive compared with normotensive individuals, and within hypertensive individuals, patients with microalbuminuria showed even higher NOX5 protein levels (Fig 1C). These data suggest that NOX5 levels are associated with hypertension and correlate with disease severity. Hypertension is rather an umbrella term that may involve different molecular mechanisms all resulting in a similar phenotype, i.e., elevated blood pressure. NOX5-dependent hypertension may be such an endotype but apply only to a subset of patients [2830]. We therefore performed a subgroup analysis of all hypertensive patients, and indeed, NOX5 levels showed a bimodal distribution (Fig 1D). Based on this, approximately every fourth hypertensive patient would fall into a high NOX5 mechanotype, which according to the protein-protein interactions (PPIs) would cause NO-cGMP signaling dysfunction. With respect to other vascular NOX isoforms, i.e., NOX1, NOX2, and NOX4, their levels did not differ significantly between normotensive and hypertensive individuals. However, patients with microalbuminuria showed higher NOX1, but lower NOX2, levels compared to normotensive individuals (S1 Fig). The higher NOX1 levels in those patients is in agreement with previous preclinical data showing that NOX1 is not associated with elevation of blood pressure but with renal oxidative stress in a model of chronic hypertension [6] and renal pathology [3133].

Table 1. Baseline characteristics in healthy individuals and hypertensive patients.

Healthy individuals
(n = 10)
HTN patients without albuminuria
(n = 20)
HTN patients with microalbuminuria
(n = 20)
p-Value
Age (y) 44 ± 4 56 ± 3 60 ± 3 0.012
Men 7 (70%) 12 (60%) 13 (65%) 0.859
Diabetes 0 (0%) 3 (15%) 6 (30%) 0.118
BMI 24.1 ± 0.94 26.1 ± 0.76 26.9 ± 0.73 0.096
Smoking 0 (0%) 7 (35%) 9 (45%) 0.042
T. Chol 178 ± 11 193 ± 9 199 ± 8 0.358
Triglyceride 158 ± 42 146 ± 19 214 ± 27 0.139
HDL 50 ± 3 47 ± 3 41 ± 2 0.081
LDL 97 ± 11 117 ± 8 115 ± 9 0.360
Fasting glucose 96 ± 6 104 ± 8 120 ± 7 0.107
Serum Cr 0.81 ± 0.07 0.91 ± 0.05 1.01 ± 0.07 0.144
Uric acid 6.2 ± 0.53 6.1 ± 0.31 6.5 ± 0.29 0.656
GFR 87.0 ± 5.69 83.2 ± 3.57 79.3 ± 5.52 0.606
FRS 5.2 ± 1.73 8.2 ± 1.78 10.9 ± 1.9 0.168
ACR 0.008 ± 0.0009 0.010 ± 0.0001 0.059 ± 0.0008 < 0.001
hs-CRP 0.56 ± 0.33 0.25 ± 0.03 0.52 ± 0.09 0.188
Adiponectin 16.0 ± 2.75 20.4 ± 3.08 18.5 ± 2.99 0.671
NT-pro-BNP 75.1 ± 11.95 80.9 ± 8.76 95.8 ± 16.9 0.572
Medications
ACE-I 0 (0%) 4 (20%) 1 (5%) 0.143
ARB 0 (0%) 14 (70%) 16 (80%) < 0.001
CCB 0 (0%) 13 (65%) 14 (70%) < 0.001
Beta-blocker 0 (0%) 2 (10%) 9 (45%) 0.005
Thiazides 0 (0%) 6 (30%) 8 (40%) 0.069
Statin 1 (10%) 3 (15%) 7 (35%) 0.185

Values are mean ± SEM or number (%).

Abbreviations: ACE-I, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ACR, albumin/creatinine ratio; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; CCB, calcium channel blocker; Cr, creatinine (mg/dL); FRS, Framingham risk score (%); GFR, glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2/year); HDL, high-density lipoprotein (mg/dL); hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/dL); HTN, hypertension; LDL, low-density lipoprotein (mg/dL); T. Chol, total cholesterol (mg/dL); T-pro-BNP, N terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pg/mL)

In addition, we determined plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) levels, a biomarker of NOS uncoupling and endothelial dysfunction [34]. We found that ADMA levels were significantly increased in hypertensive patients compared to healthy individuals (S1 Fig), which is in agreement with previous findings [35, 36].

Endothelial NOX5 induces age-related hypertension

In the absence of NOX5 specific inhibitors, we tested the possible role of NOX5 in endothelial NO-cGMP signaling dysfunction and hypertension in mice. Mice, however, lack the Nox5 gene. We therefore analyzed a knock-in (KI) mouse model expressing human Nox5 in its physiological endothelial cell location [37] (Fig 2A). In young (9–15 weeks old) NOX5 KI mice of both genders (n = 19–20), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were, however, not different from age- and sex-matched wild-type (WT) mice (Fig 2B and 2C and S2 Fig). Upon aging (68–87 weeks), though, systolic blood pressure and MAP were significantly elevated throughout the day in KI (n = 33) compared to age- and sex-matched WT mice (n = 31) (Fig 2D and S2 Fig). Diastolic blood pressure remained unmodified (Fig 2E) as did heart to body weight ratio (S3 Fig) indicating that there was no cardiac hypertrophy in KI mice, which is in line with the late (age-dependent) development of hypertension. In addition, cardiac hypertrophy does not necessarily exist with hypertension. For example, other hypertensive animal models such as endothelial NOS (eNOS) knock-out (KO) mice do not have cardiac hypertrophy [38, 39]. This is also in agreement with clinical observations that not all hypertensive patients (subgroups) have cardiac hypertrophy [4042]. Notably, there was no difference in blood pressure between aged KI male (72-hour MAP, 120 ± 3.4, n = 15, p = 0.13) and female (114 ± 2.1, n = 18) mice.

Fig 2. Preclinical validation of NOX5 in hypertension.

Fig 2

(A) Both young WT and NOX5 KI mice were normotensive; however, only KI mice become hypertensive upon ageing. (B, C) There was no significant difference in systolic (B) and diastolic (C) blood pressure between young WT (n = 19) and KI (n = 20). (D, E) Aged KI mice (n = 33) had higher systolic (D) but similar diastolic (E) blood pressure compared to WT (n = 31). Telemetry data were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals **p < 0.01. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file. KI, knock-in; NOX5, NADPH oxidase 5; WT, wild type.

Taken together, our observations indicate that in mice, expression of NOX5 in the endothelium leads, upon aging, to a selective elevation of systolic arterial blood pressure. Having established the potential of NOX5 to induce a hypertensive phenotype, we wanted to test the mechanistic link to vascular NO-cGMP signaling as suggested from the in silico network analysis.

Endothelial NOX5 causes endothelial dysfunction by uncoupling NOS

In the thoracic aorta, femoral artery, and saphenous artery isolated from aged KI and WT mice of both genders (n = 9), we analyzed the structural, smooth muscle, and endothelial vasomotor properties. Collectively, these blood vessels cover the entire range of large elastic conduit, muscular conduit, and small muscular resistance-sized arteries, respectively. In the thoracic aorta, femoral artery, and saphenous artery of the aged animals, the relation between resting wall tension and arterial lumen diameter did not differ between KI and WT mice (S4 Fig). It is therefore unlikely that the blood pressure phenotype of the KI mice resulted from stiffening or inward remodeling of the conduit or resistance arteries. This is in agreement with previous studies that structural stiffening of arteries is not a general observation in rodent models of (essential) hypertension [4346]. Also, clinical data, especially from aged hypertensive patients, are in line with this finding [4750].

To test the effect of endothelial NOX5 on endothelium-dependent, NO-cGMP–mediated relaxation, arterial segments were pre-contracted by either depolarization (K+), α1-adrenergic activation (phenylephrine), or endothelin-1; vasorelaxation was then induced by acetylcholine (Ach) the classical endothelium-derived relaxing factor stimulant [51]. In femoral arteries, irrespective of whether pre-contracted with K+, phenylephrine, or endothelin-1, the amplitudes of Ach-induced relaxing responses were significantly smaller in KI compared to WT mice (Fig 3A) (S5 Fig). Conversely, in the saphenous artery (Fig 3B) (S5 Fig) and thoracic aorta (S5 Fig), Ach-induced relaxing responses did not differ between KI and WT mice. When comparing ours to previous studies, the Ach-induced relaxation of the saphenous arteries of both mice groups seemed attenuated [5254]. There are 2 possible explanations for this discrepancy. First, we have used very old mice and other studies used young mice [5254]. Second, we have used mice with a mixed genetic background (80% 129/Sv and 20% C57Bl6), and previous data showed that endothelium-dependent relaxation is smaller in 129/Sv compared with C57Bl6 mice [55].

Fig 3. Endothelial NOX5 induces endothelial dysfunction and hypertension by uncoupling NOS.

Fig 3

(A) Femoral arteries of aged KI mice (n = 9) precontracted with Phe had less responsiveness to Ach-induced relaxation compared to WT (n = 9), while pretreatment with sepiapterin (100 μM) improved relaxation in KI (n = 4), which was not different from WT (n = 3). (B) Saphenous arteries of aged KI mice (n = 9) precontracted with Phe showed no difference in Ach-induced relaxation compared to WT (n = 8). Myograph data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. (C) Schematic representation of NOX5-induced age-dependent hypertension. In ageing, endothelial NOX5 is activated and interferes with normal NO-cGMP signaling, which results in impaired vascular smooth muscle relaxations and raised blood pressure. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals ***p < 0.001. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file. Ach, acetylcholine; cGMP, cyclic GMP; ET-1, endothelin-1; H4Bip, tetrahydrobiopterin; KI, knock-in; NA, noradrenaline; NO, nitric oxide; NOS3, endothelial nitric oxide synthase; NOX5, NADPH oxidase; Phe, phenylephrine; sGC, soluble guanylate cyclase; SN, sympathetic nerve; uc-NOS3, uncoupled NOS3; WT, wild type.

In segments of the thoracic aorta and femoral artery contracted with 256 nM endothelin-1, the relaxing effects of Ach were reversed by 100 μM L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (a pharmacological inhibitor of NOSs), and this did not differ significantly between preparations of KI and WT mice (S5 Fig). In the saphenous arteries of both types of mice, L-NAME did not modify the relaxing effects of Ach (S5 Fig). This is in line with our earlier findings indicating that in these resistance-sized arteries, Ach-induced relaxation is mediated by endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization but not NO [5254].

To check whether this caliber-specific effect on vasomotor function was due to differential expression of NOX5 along the systemic arterial tree, we measured Nox5 gene expression by quantitative PCR (qPCR). There was, however, no difference in Nox5 gene expression between thoracic aorta, femoral arteries, and saphenous arteries of Nox5 KI mice (S6 Fig). These data suggest an aging-dependent dysfunction of endothelial NO-cGMP signaling due to NOX5 and that this effect is not uniformly distributed along the systemic arterial tree.

We next tested whether, alternatively, chronic changes in the underlying arterial smooth muscle layer could have contributed to the observed blood pressure and vasomotor phenotypes in aged Nox5 KI mice. Contractile responses to K+ and the sensitivity and maximal responsiveness to phenylephrine and endothelin-1 did not, however, differ between KI and WT mice in all arterial segments (S7 Fig). Also, the blunting of agonist-induced contractile responses by indomethacin was similar in the thoracic aorta of the KI and WT mice (S7 Fig).

To test which component of NO-cGMP signaling was most likely affected, we tested an uncoupling effect on endothelial NOS [56] or oxidative damage of the NO receptor, soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) yielding oxidized or heme-free apo-sGC [57, 58]. To test for sGC/apo-sGC, relaxing responses to the NO donor compound and sGC stimulator, propylamine propylamine NONOate (PAPA/NO) (0.01–10 μM) [59], and to the apo-sGC activator, BAY 60–2770 (0.01–10 μM) [57], were analyzed. Neither the PAPA/NO (S8 Fig) nor the BAY 60–2770 response (S8 Fig) differed between WT and KI mice. These observations suggested that sGC was not dysfunctional in aged NOX5 KI mice.

Uncoupling of endothelial NOS is considered a major cause of endothelial dysfunction characterized by decreased NO formation and increased superoxide production and occurs mainly when ROS oxidize the NOS cofactor tetrahydrobiopterin (H4Bip) [60]. When we incubated femoral arteries of aged NOX5 KI mice, precontracted with phenylephrine, with the H4Bip precursor sepiapterin (100 μM), Ach-induced relaxations were greatly improved and became indistinguishable from those in WT (Fig 3A). Also, femoral arteries of aged NOX5 KI mice showed higher superoxide formation (as indicated by dihydroethidium [DHE] staining) than WT, and this increase was inhibited by pretreatment with the NOS inhibitor, L-NAME (S9 Fig). We also tested whether the impaired Ach-induced relaxation in the femoral arteries of Nox5 KI mice could be reversed by adding antioxidants to the bath medium. Neither 10 μM N-acetylcysteine nor 100 μM tempol, however, were effective (S10 Fig). Collectively, these data suggest that endothelial NOX5 induces endothelial dysfunction by uncoupling of endothelial NOS leading to impaired endothelium-dependent relaxation of muscular conduit arteries and thus systolic hypertension (Fig 3C).

Discussion

Based on human genetic, human clinical, and genetic preclinical mechanistic validation, we here report the first identified causal molecular mechanism of human systolic hypertension associated with aging. This endotype affects approximately one in 4 patients and molecularly consists of a NOX5-induced uncoupling of endothelial NOS followed by impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in muscular conduit arteries. Detection of elevated levels of NOX5 in circulating microparticles appears to serve as a mechanism-based liquid biopsy marker to stratify patients for therapeutic intervention. Based on our in vivo validation, such an intervention may include the H4Bpi precursor and NOS recoupling agent sepiapterin and (once such compounds should become clinically available) [6164] a NOX5 inhibitor.

Here, we used a KI mouse model that expresses human NOX5 in endothelial cells and white blood cells mimicking, to a large extent, the physiological pattern of NOX5 expression in humans [37]. While we cannot exclude a potential contribution of leukocytic NOX5 on hypertension in aged animals in our in vivo experiments, a contribution of adhering leukocytes is unlikely in our ex vivo experiments. Expression of human Nox5 in mice led with aging to severe systolic hypertension. This was not due to stiffening, structural remodeling, or increased sensitivity to vasoconstrictor stimuli in the systemic arterial tree. It rather resulted from a regionally selective and specific attenuation of NO-mediated endothelium-dependent relaxation in medium-sized muscular conduit arteries via uncoupling of NOS.

Collectively, our data warrant clinical proof-of-concept trials aiming at a theragnostic [65] strategy in carefully stratified hypertensive patients based on the detection of elevated NOX5, ROS overproduction, e.g., by oxidatively modified proteins, and mechanism-based functional repair by a network pharmacology approach that inhibits NOX5 and recouples NOS. If successful, this will be the first case of a molecular redefinition of the phenotypic disease definition, essential hypertension, and the first step towards precision medicine in a currently high number-needed-to-treat indication. This may be the case for about a fourth of all hypertensives. Our estimate, though significant, is limited by the relatively small number of patients in the present study and needs to be validated in larger and international hypertension cohort. In addition, other factors that might affect NOX5 and endothelial function, including smoking, comorbidities, and antihypertensive drugs, warrant investigation in future studies.

Because NOX5 is also involved in a worse outcome in stroke [37]—for which hypertension is a major risk factor [66]—and correlates with atherosclerosis [67], this approach may lower not only blood pressure but also 2 major consequences of hypertension, stroke and myocardial infarction.

On a broader scale, our present 3-fold interactome-based approach for disease module discovery, preclinical and clinal validation appears to be applicable to a wide range of common or complex diseases. We here identify NOX5 as the missing link between ROS and impaired NO signaling. The full module consists of NOX5, NOS3, the different subunits of the NO receptor sGC, and the phosphodiesterases PDE5 and PDE9, as well as the cGMP-dependent protein kinase, PKG1. The dysregulation of such a module may be best treated by multiple drugs targeting different protein components. In the present case, the WT mice mimic pharmacological NOX5 inhibition (not yet available) and the treatment with sepiapterin, NOS recoupling.

Disease module construction is a young research field at the interface of biomedicine and bioinformatics. We began with a seed gene-based approach, based on clinically validated proteins. Noxs were suggested by GWAS in old [5] but not in younger patients [68] and are the only known enzyme family solely dedicated to ROS formation [69]. The NO-cGMP pathway is important for blood pressure regulation and its dysfunction a hallmark of hypertension [70]. Our approach yielded a module containing a sufficient set of NO-cGMP signaling components, and, importantly, NOX5 was the sole ROS source. We confirmed our findings independently by 2 complementing in silico network module detection approaches. As a potential limitation of our in silico findings, the interaction between NOX5 and cGMP-related proteins has been shown experimentally so far in only one study [23].

Our clinical data are yet still correlative and deserve extensive further investigation. Endothelial microparticles are, however, well established surrogate biomarkers associated with hypertension and its progression [71, 72]. They produce ROS, contain NOX, induce endothelial dysfunction, and impair endothelium-dependent relaxation [73]. In human endothelial cells, angiotensin II—the target of clinically used angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors—and the pro-hypertensive autacoid endothelin-1 increase NOX5 expression (gene and protein) and activity [74]. In addition to its physiological vascular expression in endothelial cells, NOX5 is also increased (gene, protein, and activity) to higher levels in human renal proximal tubule cells of hypertensive patients [75], which may contribute to the observed correlation of NOX5, blood pressure, and microalbuminuria. Induction of NOX5 in smooth muscle cells does not cause hypertension per se but correlates with advanced atherosclerotic lesions, and diseased coronary arteries show high NOX5 expression and activity [67]. Hypertension is rather an umbrella term for different blood pressure–elevating mechanisms. Some of these may be related to worse clinical outcomes, some not. NOX5-dependent hypertension, however, appears to be disease relevant as this molecular mechanism also leads to or aggravates hypertension-associated clinical outcomes, stroke [37], myocardial infarction [76], and renal failure [75, 77]. Together, the human NOX5 data provide an exciting clinical lead, which we are now planning on following up in a major multicenter, multinational clinical trial (HYPERNET).

GWAS had delivered 2 Nox candidate genes, Nox4 and Nox5. Knocking out Nox4 is without a blood pressure phenotype [12, 78]; in many models, Nox4 was rather a vasoprotective [13, 79, 80]. The enzymatic product of NOX4, H2O2, activates NOS [81] and is an alternative endothelium-derived relaxing factor in its own right [8284]. This left Nox5 as a candidate gene, which was confirmed by first neighbor analysis linked to NO-cGMP signaling. Unlike NOX4, NOX5 produces superoxide, which can either uncouple endothelial NOS in hypertension by oxidation of H4Bip [85, 86] in a sepiapterin-reversible manner [87] or scavenge NO to form peroxynitrite, which may also act as a cytotoxic agent or vasodilator [88, 89]. The mechanistic validation of this role of NOX5 in hypertension was performed in a preclinical mouse KI model expressing Nox5, not present in the mouse genome, in the physiological cell type, endothelial cells where NOX5 is important for endothelial migration and angiogenesis [90]. In mice expressing Nox5 non-physiologically in smooth muscle cells, blood pressure is normal, and angiotensin II–induced high blood pressure is not augmented [17]. Of note, in other animal models of hypertension—e.g., spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and Dahl salt-sensitive rats, in which NOX5 is not present—antioxidants can reduce blood pressure [9193]. This may suggest that, if relevant also to humans, other endotypes of hypertension may involve other ROS sources (mitochondria, xanthine oxidase, or myeloperoxidase).

Of particular interest is the regionally selective effect of NOX5, which was reminiscent of the vascular heterogeneity in age-related endothelial dysfunction [94, 95]. It was present in muscular femoral conduit arteries but not in the small resistance-sized saphenous arteries (lumen diameter <250 μm) of the KI mice and could thus selectively result in systolic hypertension with accompanying elevation of arterial pulse pressure. However, we have not considered other small resistance arteries, including renal arteries, which control sodium handling and blood pressure and are more relevant in secondary renovascular hypertension [96]. This effect of NOX5 was not reversed in our ex vivo experiments by antioxidants, presumably because NOS uncoupling was already established chronically in vivo by NOX5-derived superoxide or NO production was reduced as part of age-related endothelial dysfunction. Preclinically, sepiapterin or H4Bip lower elevated blood pressure induced by NOS uncoupling [97, 98]. As a potential limitation to our study, we did not re-examine in vivo in Nox5 KI mice the efficacy of sepiapterin to reverse NOS uncoupling and hypertension. Another limitation and general pitfall of all animal models (particularly the KI mouse model) are differences between human and mouse physiology and that expressing a human protein in mice may not wholly reflect its role in human pathology [99].

With respect to the clinical dimension of our findings, our observation that plasma ADMA levels were elevated in hypertensive patients speaks in favor of NOS uncoupling [35, 36]; yet a similar mechanistic link to NOX5 as we obtained pre-clinically in Nox5 KI mice would require the ex vivo analysis of isolated human blood vessels or an interventional trial with sepiapterin. Indeed, sepiapterin analogs, i.e., folic acid and H4Bip, are clinically effective to reduce elevated blood pressure by improving endothelial function [100, 101]. Folic acid, either alone [102] or in combination with antihypertensives [103, 104], reduces the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in hypertensive patients.

Overall, our findings using in silico network approaches as well as further clinical and preclinical validation explain the long-observed correlation between oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and systolic hypertension. Humanized endothelial cell Nox5 KI mice represent the first mechanism-based animal model of human age-related hypertension and endothelial dysfunction. Therapeutically, NOX5 inhibition and NOS recoupling, ideally in combination with mechanistic biomarker stratification, e.g., based on endothelial microparticle liquid biopsies, represents a first-in-class mechanism-based approach for curative antihypertensive therapy obviating the need for symptomatic vasodilators.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

This human subjects study was approved by the research ethics committee of Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Taipei Veterans General Hospital Institutional Review Board, No.: 96-12-42A), and all participants provided their written informed consent. The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. It was approved by the appropriate health authorities, an independent ethics committees, and the Institutional Review Board of Taipei Veterans General Hospital.

All animal experimental research was approved by the Animal Welfare Body (IvD) of Maastricht University, the Animal Ethics Committee (Dier Experimenten Commissie [DEC]), and the Central Authority for Scientific Procedures on Animals (Centrale Commissie Dierproeven [CCD]). The DEC project numbers are 2012–123 and PV 2017–029, and the license number is AVD1070020174486. The animal care and use protocol adhere to the ARRIVE guidelines (“Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments”; https://arriveguidelines.org/), Wet op dierproeven (WoD; 2014, https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0003081/2019-01-01), the Dierproevenregeling (DpR; 2014, https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2014-34746.html), the Dierproevenbesluit (DpB; 2014, https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0035866/2014-12-18), and the EU Directive 2010/63 (2010, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/63/2019-06-26).

Study design

The human subjects sample size was determined by G*Power software. For mice, we used a power analysis according to the formula n = 2× s2× (Za/2 + Zb)2/D2 (L. Sachs, Angewandte Statistik, Springer, 1983, Berlijn, Springer Verlag). Human subjects with history or clinical evidence of angina, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, inflammatory disease, or any disease predisposing to vasculitis were excluded. Causes of secondary hypertension were excluded by appropriate investigations. Patients with stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease (GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) were also excluded. Human samples were allocated to different groups based on blood pressure and albuminuria values. Mice were allocated to experimental groups according to genotypes. Investigators were blinded to the experimental groups. Replicate experiments were successful. All experiments were reproduced at least 3 times with independent biological samples.

In silico methods

We extracted a molecular subnetwork from experimentally validated PPIs from the IID [22] database (interactome) version 2018–11 using NOX family members and NO-cGMP related proteins as seed nodes. This set of seeds comprises NOX1, NOX4, NOX5, NOS1, NOS3, GCYA1, GCYA2, GCYB1, PDE5A, PDE9A, and KGP1. We obtained the subnetwork induced by all first neighbors of the seed genes from the interactome. The induced subnetwork was then pruned according to the SPD, defined as the degree of the node (protein) inside the subnetwork normalized by the degree of the node in the full interactome. The SPD quantifies how enriched the interactions of a given protein are in a given subnetwork. This way, we emerged a weighted disease module, which is represented by a set of connected components and some single nodes. We selected an SPD cutoff corresponding to 80% of the cumulative sum of the percentage of the nodes as a cutoff value in the pruning step, as this includes most module-specific interactions while excluding most nonspecific nodes. The final subnetwork consisted of 56 proteins and 83 PPIs.

Moreover, we applied the 2 top-ranked disease network module identification methods from the Module Identification DREAM Challenge [24] to the interactome. We selected these methods from 2 complementary categories of methods, global and local. The main difference between these 2 methods is that global methods exploit the global structure information of PPIs networks, while the local method considers only local neighbor information. The global modularity optimization method (M1) of the DREAM challenge bundled in the MONET tool and the agglomerative local method (L1) from SPICi tool [26] have been selected (as best-performers in their categories) and applied to find disease modules in the interactome. Note that M1 is an ensemble approach combining multiple module detection algorithms to avoid suboptimal partitions resulting from individual algorithms [25], which notably works without any seed nodes in this tool. The agglomerative L1 method clusters the network greedily, starting from automatically selected local seeds with a high weighted degree. This algorithm improves the local density of modules in the neighboring region of seed nodes.

Human study participants

We designed the current study based on a previous study in which we had enrolled consecutive outpatients with essential hypertension and a baseline eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between April 2008 and December 2008 [105, 106]. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, or use of antihypertensive drugs. Individuals with history or clinical evidence of angina, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, inflammatory disease, or any disease predisposing to vasculitis were excluded. Causes of secondary hypertension were excluded by appropriate investigations. Patients with stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease (GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) were also excluded. Medical history, including cardiovascular risk factors, previous and present cardiovascular events, and current medication regimen, was obtained during a personal interview and from medical files. Weight, height, and waist circumference were measured, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Brachial blood pressure was measured by a physician with a mercury sphygmomanometer after patients sat for 15 minutes or longer. The average of 3 measurements was used for the analysis.

Blood and urine measurements

Venous blood samples were collected from all patients after 8 hours of overnight fasting for measurement. The blood samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes immediately after collection, and the plasma samples were kept frozen at −70°C until analysis. Each standard and plasma sample was analyzed twice, and the mean value was used in all subsequent analyses. The plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level was determined using a latex-enhanced immunonephelometric assay (Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany). Plasma N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was determined by a sandwich immunoassay (EIMA) with 2 antibodies (Cortez Diagnostics, Calabasas, CA). Plasma ADMA levels were measured by ADMA Fast Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kit (DLD Diagnostika GMBH, Hamburg, Germany). Overnight urine samples were obtained for measurement of the albumin excretion rate. Normoalbuminuria was defined as albumin excretion rate of less than 20 mg/min, moderately increased albuminuria (previously known as microalbuminuria) was defined as albumin excretion rate of 20–200 mg/min, and severely increased albuminuria (previously known as macroalbuminuria) was defined as albumin excretion rate more than 200 mg/min.

Endothelial microparticle extraction and measurement of NOX5

CD144+ microparticles were isolated as described with modifications [107, 108]. Briefly, Dynabeads G (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were washed with PBS containing 0.1% BSA and then reconstituted with PBS. Anti-CD144 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), which specifically targets endothelial cells, was mixed with prewashed Dynabeads G for 2 hours and then incubated with plasma samples at 1:200 dilution overnight at 4°C. After precipitation, Dynabeads G were washed with PBS and 1% Tween-20 three times. The purity of CD144+ MPs, determined by FACS analysis, was 70% ± 5.6%. With the use of FITC-conjugated beads as size references, the size of such particles was assessed to be <0.5 μm in diameter. Human NOX5 levels were measured using commercially available ELISA (Cusabio Technology LLC, Houston, Texas) kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were stored at −70°C from the date of collection in 2008 until testing for NOX5 in 2014 (a total of 50 samples were available). The intra-assay and inter-assay variation coefficients of the tests were <8% and <10%, respectively. NOX1, NOX2, and NOX4 were also measured by ELISA kits (Cloud-Clone, Katy, TX) in another cohort of patients. The baseline characteristics of those patients are listed in S1 Table.

Animals

Mice naturally do not express the NOX5 gene, therefore we have generated and validated humanized Nox5 KI mice as previously described [37]. Briefly, the model was developed using the hypoxanthine phospho-ribosyl-transferase (Hprt) targeted transgenic approach under the control of the Tie2 promoter. Therefore, our Nox5 KI mice express the NOX5 in endothelial and white blood cells which mimic the physiological human expression of NOX5. The expression of Nox5 in the KI mice tissues was previously validated by real-time qPCR and compared to WT mice [37].

Age- and gender-matched groups of male and female mice (9–15 weeks old, n = 19–20) and (68–87 weeks old, n = 31–33) were used. All mice were allowed free access to water and food in a temperature-regulated room (22°C) and placed in a 12-hour light-dark cycle.

Blood pressure recording (telemetry)

Nox5 KI and WT mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (induction, 3%–4%; maintenance, 1.5%–2.5%) and echocardiography (ultrasound) was performed (S11 Fig). To implant the telemetry transmitters, 5 days after the ultrasound, mice were anesthetized with the same protocol, and preoperative analgesia was done by subcutaneous injection of 0.05 mg/kg buprenorphine repeated every 12 hours. Each mouse was placed on a heating pad (UNO temperature control unit, UNO Roestvaststaal BV), and body temperature was monitored using a rectal probe and maintained at 37.0°C using a feedback-controlled infrared light. An incision in the skin overlying the carotid artery was made. Via this incision, in the subcutaneous space of the flank a pocket was created for inserting the telemetry transmitter (TA11PA-C10; Data Sciences, St. Paul, MN) to monitor blood pressure, heart rate, and motor activity. The left carotid artery was dissected free and 3 ligatures (5–0, silk) were placed: at the bifurcation of the internal and external carotid to close the vessel, at the heart to temporarily close the vessel, and one in between to fixate the catheter. Via a small hole cut in the artery, the catheter was introduced and advanced into the aortic arch. Then, the pocket in the flank was filled with 3 mL prewarmed saline, and the transmitter was placed in the pocket. The wound was then closed using a polysorb 5–0 suture. All surgical procedures were performed under aseptic conditions. Post-operative analgesia was done by a subcutaneous injection of 0.05 mg/kg buprenorphine after 6 hours and 5 mg/kg carprofen after 24 and 48 hours. Mice were allowed to recover for 7–14 days before starting the measurement. Mice were housed individually in a quiet room. Blood pressure was measured over a 72-hour period [109111], with 10 cycles of 75 s/hour. Radio signals from the transmitter were continuously monitored with a fully automated data-acquisition system (Dataquest A.R.T.; Data Sciences). Mice were euthanized by CO2/O2 inhalation, and organs were taken out for further analysis. Organ and body weights are presented in S3 Fig.

Myograph

After mice were euthanized, thoracic aortae and femoral and saphenous arteries were dissected free from perivascular adipose tissue and mounted in a wire myograph (DMT, Aarhus, DK). The organ chamber was filled with Krebs‐Ringer bicarbonate‐buffered salt solution (KRB) that was continuously aerated with 95% O2/5% CO2 and maintained at 37°C. The passive stretch procedure was performed to mimic the physiologically relevant internal lumen diameter as previously described [112]. Arterial contractile and relaxing responses were recorded at lumen diameters corresponding to a distending pressure of 100 mmHg in the thoracic aorta and femoral artery and at 90% of this diameter in the resistance-sized saphenous artery. This is justified because diastolic arterial blood pressure did not differ significantly between the aged KI and WT mice. In view of the comparable diameter–tension relationships, these diameters did not differ significantly between the 2 mouse strains (S12 Fig). The diameter tension relationships were constructed according to the law of Laplace for a cylindrical tube: P = T/R (with P for transmural pressure, T for wall tension, and R for the lumen radius of the tube). Consequently, wall stiffness can be determined equally by recording (1) changes in tension in response to imposed changes in radius (wire myography) or (2) changes in radius in response to changes in transmural pressure (pressure myography) [113, 114]. Here, we used the former approach because it has a higher throughput than the latter. Stress-strain relationships and even better “incremental elastic (Young’s) modulus” (which require additional recording of wall thickness) only come into play to discriminate between structural and material property contributions to changes in arterial stiffness. Part of the isolated thoracic aorta was studied in the absence and part in the continuous presence of 10 μM indomethacin to inhibit the production of prostaglandins that can act as endothelium-derived vasoactive factors in this vessel. The vessels were tested for their contractile response to 40 mM K+, concentration-response curves of phenylephrine (0.01 to 100 μM) and endothelin-1 (1–256 nM) followed by Ach (0.01 to 100 μM), PAPA/NO (0.01–10 μM), or Bay60-2770 (0.01–10 μM)-induced relaxations. The wall tension of the vessel segment was continuously recorded with LabChart Pro (ADInstruments, Oxford, UK).

Measurement of superoxide formation: DHE staining

Superoxide was measured in femoral arteries using the fluorescence dye DHE (Thermo Scientific Technology, the Netherlands). Frozen femoral arteries cryosections were fixated in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS and then incubated with 2 μM DHE for 30 minutes at 37°C. After 3 washing steps with PBS, slices were incubated with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, the Netherlands) 2 μg/ml for 10 minutes. Sections were washed in PBS and then mounted using a Dako Fluorescence Mounting Medium (S3023, Agilent Technologies). Immunofluorescent signals were viewed using a Leica DMI3000 B fluorescence microscope. Some arteries were pretreated with 500 μM L-NAME for 30 minute at 37°C before performing the DHE staining.

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and real-time qPCR

Thoracic aortae, femoral arteries, and saphenous arteries were isolated from mice and immediately submerged in RNAlater solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RNA was extracted using RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA in 20 μl reactions using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After synthesis, the cDNA was stored at −20°C.

Real-time qPCR was performed on CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). All reactions were performed in triplicates in a total volume of 20 μl each using TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems-Life Technologies) according to manufacturer instructions. Three microliters of cDNA was used as a template, and pre-designed TaqMan primers of β-actin and Nox5 were used. The specific assay IDs for the primers used are shown in S2 Table. The standard PCR conditions were as follows: 10 minutes at 95°C, followed by 15 seconds at 95°C and 1 minute at 60°C, 59 repeats. The amount of mRNA was normalized to the measured expression of β-actin mRNA.

Statistical analysis

All human and animal data are expressed as mean ± SEM for numeric variables and as number (percentage) for categorical variables. Comparisons of continuous variables between the 2 mice groups were performed by unpaired two-tailed Student t test and among the 3 human groups by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (post hoc test). Comparisons of categorical variables among the human groups were assessed by a χ2 test. Comparisons between the 2 mice groups in telemetry data were done by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and in myograph by ordinary two-way ANOVA, followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. For the subgroup analysis of the NOX5 levels in human subjects, a frequency analysis was carried out, where the bin width is calculated using Sturges’ rule [115]. To assess the modality of the data, the output frequencies were fitted with a single Gaussian and sum of 2 Gaussian distributions, as well as a two-tailed F-test with a null hypothesis as Gaussian and alternative hypothesis as a sum of 2 Gaussians was performed. Additionally, the adjusted r2 values were compared to select the best-fitting distribution for the sample. Given the bimodal nature of the sample, the area under each Gaussian distribution was calculated using the formula “Amplitude*SD/0.3989,” and subsequently the proportion of the NOX5 mechanotype was reported as the ratio between the 2 distributions. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 8.2 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA); p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance after multiple testing correction.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Levels of NOX1, NOX2, NOX4, and ADMA in normotensive and hypertensive individuals.

(A–C) There were no differences in NOX1, NOX2, or NOX4 levels between hypertensive patients with normoalbuminuria (n = 20) compared to normotensive individuals (n = 20). NOX1 levels were higher (A), but NOX2 were lower (B) in hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria (n = 20) compared to normotensive individuals. Comparison between groups was done by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (D) ADMA levels were significantly higher in hypertensive patients (n = 40) compared to healthy individuals (n = 20). Comparison between the two groups was done by two-tailed unpaired t test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. MAP in young and aged WT and KI mice.

(A) There was no significant difference in MAP between young WT (n = 19) and KI (n = 20). (B) Aged KI mice (n = 33) had higher MAP compared to WT (n = 31). Telemetry data were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals **p < 0.01. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Body and organ weights in aged WT and KI mice.

(A–E) There was no difference in body, heart, and kidney weights between WT (n = 24) and KI mice (n = 20); however, lung/body weight ratio was higher in KI mice. Comparison between groups were done by two-tailed unpaired t test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals *p < 0.05.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Arterial stiffness in aged WT and KI mice.

(A–C) The relation between resting wall tension and arterial lumen diameter did not differ between KI (n = 9) and WT (n = 9) mice in thoracic aortae (A), femoral arteries (B), and saphenous arteries (C). All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Ach-induced relaxations in arteries of aged WT and KI mice.

(A–C) Ach-induced relaxations were impaired in femoral arteries (A) of aged KI mice (n = 9) compared to WT (n = 8–9) but not in saphenous arteries (B) and thoracic aortae (with/without indomethacin) (C) precontracted with K+. (D–F) Ach-induced relaxations were impaired in femoral arteries (D) of aged KI mice (n = 9) compared to WT (n = 8–9) but not in saphenous arteries (E) and thoracic aortae with/without indomethacin (F) precontracted with endothelin-1. (G) There was no difference in Ach-induced relaxations in thoracic aortae (with/without indomethacin) precontracted with phenylephrine between WT (n = 9) and KI mice (n = 9). (H–J) Ach-induced relaxations in arteries made to contract with endothelin-1 were reversed by 100 μM L-NAME in femoral arteries (H) and thoracic aortae (I), but not saphenous arteries (J) of both aged KI mice (n = 8–9) and WT (n = 8–9). Myograph data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals, *p < 0.05. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. qPCR of NOX5 in TAO, FAs, and SAs of aged KI mice.

There was no difference in NOX5 gene expression between the 3 vessel types (n = 3, each in duplicates). Comparison were done by one-way ANOVA. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file. FA, femoral artery; SA, saphenous artery; TAO, thoracic aortae.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Contractile responses in arteries of aged WT and KI mice.

There was no difference in contractile responses to K+, phenylephrine, and endothelin-1 in femoral arteries (A–C), saphenous arteries (D–F), and thoracic aortae (with/without indomethacin) (G–I) between WT (n = 8–9) and KI mice (n = 9). Comparison between 2 groups in contractile responses to K+ was done by two-tailed t test. Other myograph data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

(TIF)

S8 Fig. Endothelium-independent relaxations in arteries of aged WT and KI mice.

(A–C) Relaxations induced by the NO donor, PAPA NO (0.01–10 μM), in femoral arteries (A), saphenous arteries (B), and thoracic aortae (with/without indomethacin) (C) did not differ between WT (n = 8–9) and KI mice (n = 9). (D) Relaxations induced by the apo-sGC activator, Bay60-2770 (0.01–10 μM), in femoral arteries did not differ between WT (n = 4) and KI mice (n = 4). Myograph data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

(TIF)

S9 Fig. Representative images of DHE staining of femoral arteries of aged WT and KI mice.

(TIF)

S10 Fig. Ach-induced relaxations in femoral arteries of aged KI mice treated with antioxidants.

In segments of femoral artery (n = 3–6) made to contract with 10 μM phenylephrine, relaxing effects of Ach (10 μM) were not reversed by 10 μM N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (A) or 100 μM tempol (B). Comparison between groups were done by two-tailed unpaired t test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

(TIF)

S11 Fig. Echocardiography in aged WT and KI mice.

There were no differences in all parameters between WT (n = 28) and KI mice (n = 29). Comparison between groups were done by two-tailed unpaired t test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

(TIF)

S12 Fig. Arteries diameter in aged WT and KI mice.

There were no differences in diameter of thoracic aortae (A), femoral arteries (B), and saphenous arteries (with/without indomethacin) between WT (n = 9) and KI mice (n = 9). Comparison between groups were done by two-tailed unpaired t test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Baseline characteristics in healthy individuals and hypertensive patients of the second cohort.

Values are mean ± SD or number (%). BMI, body mass index; LDL, low density lipoprotein.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. qPCR assays.

(XLSX)

S1 Data. Numerical raw data.

All numerical raw data are combined in a single Excel file, “S1_Data.xlsx.” This file consists of several spreadsheets. Each spreadsheet contains the raw data of one table, figure, or subfigure as indicated.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Daniel Marbach and Sven Bergmann for helpful discussions.

Abbreviations

Ach

acetylcholine

ADMA

asymmetric dimethylarginine

ARRIVE

Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments

BMI

body mass index

cGMP

cyclic guanosine monophosphate

DHE

dihydroethidium

DpB

Dierproevenbesluit

DpR

Dierproevenregeling

ecSOD

extracellular superoxide dismutase

eGFR

estimated glomerular filtration rate

ELISA

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

eNOS

endothelial nitric oxide synthase

GCYA1

soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) alpha

GCYB

sGC beta

GWAS

genome-wide association studies

H4Bip

tetrahydrobiopterin

Hprt

hypoxanthine phospho-ribosyl-transferase

hs-CRP

high-sensitivity C-reactive protein

KGP1

cGMP-dependent protein kinase 1

KI

knock-in

KO

knock-out

L-NAME

L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester

MAP

mean arterial pressure

NO

nitric oxide

NOS

NO synthase

NOX

NADPH oxidase

PAPA/NO

propylamine propylamine NONOate

PDE5A

phosphodiesterase 5A

PFA

paraformaldehyde

qPCR

quantitative PCR

PPI

protein-protein interaction

ROS

reactive oxygen species

sGC

soluble guanylate cyclase

SHR

spontaneously hypertensive rats

SPD

subnetwork-participation-degree

SPICi

Speed and Performance In Clustering

WoD

Wet op dierproeven

WT

wild type

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. For in silico data, we used the interactome from IID database which is available at http://ophid.utoronto.ca/iid. For computational data analysis, the MONET tool (https://github.com/BergmannLab/MONET) and SPICi tool (https://compbio.cs.princeton.edu/spici/) were used.

Funding Statement

J.B. is grateful for financial support of his VILLUM Young Investigator grant (no. 13154). Financial support to H.H.H.W.S. by the ERC (AdG RadMed '294683' and PoC SAVEBRAIN '737586') and the Horizon 2020 programme (REPO-TRIAL '777111') is gratefully acknowledged. This reflects only the author's view and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Olsen MH, Angell SY, Asma S, Boutouyrie P, Burger D, Chirinos JA, et al. A call to action and a lifecourse strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pressure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on hypertension. Lancet. 2016;388(10060):2665–712. Epub 2016/09/28. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31134-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oparil S, Acelajado MC, Bakris GL, Berlowitz DR, Cifkova R, Dominiczak AF, et al. Hypertension. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4:18014 Epub 2018/03/23. 10.1038/nrdp.2018.14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ogden LG, He J, Lydick E, Whelton PK. Long-term absolute benefit of lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients according to the JNC VI risk stratification. Hypertension. 2000;35(2):539–43. Epub 2000/02/19. 10.1161/01.hyp.35.2.539 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gryglewski RJ, Palmer RM, Moncada S. Superoxide anion is involved in the breakdown of endothelium-derived vascular relaxing factor. Nature. 1986;320(6061):454–6. Epub 1986/04/03. 10.1038/320454a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kraja AT, Cook JP, Warren HR, Surendran P, Liu C, Evangelou E, et al. New Blood Pressure-Associated Loci Identified in Meta-Analyses of 475 000 Individuals. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2017;10(5). Epub 2017/10/17. 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.117.001778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yogi A, Mercure C, Touyz J, Callera GE, Montezano AC, Aranha AB, et al. Renal redox-sensitive signaling, but not blood pressure, is attenuated by Nox1 knockout in angiotensin II-dependent chronic hypertension. Hypertension. 2008;51(2):500–6. Epub 2008/01/16. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.103192 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Murdoch CE, Alom-Ruiz SP, Wang M, Zhang M, Walker S, Yu B, et al. Role of endothelial Nox2 NADPH oxidase in angiotensin II-induced hypertension and vasomotor dysfunction. Basic Res Cardiol. 2011;106(4):527–38. Epub 2011/04/30. 10.1007/s00395-011-0179-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sag CM, Schnelle M, Zhang J, Murdoch CE, Kossmann S, Protti A, et al. Distinct Regulatory Effects of Myeloid Cell and Endothelial Cell NADPH Oxidase 2 on Blood Pressure. Circulation. 2017;135(22):2163–77. Epub 2017/03/17. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu J, Saleh MA, Kirabo A, Itani HA, Montaniel KR, Xiao L, et al. Immune activation caused by vascular oxidation promotes fibrosis and hypertension. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(1):50–67. Epub 2015/11/26. 10.1172/JCI80761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dikalov SI, Dikalova AE, Bikineyeva AT, Schmidt HH, Harrison DG, Griendling KK. Distinct roles of Nox1 and Nox4 in basal and angiotensin II-stimulated superoxide and hydrogen peroxide production. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008;45(9):1340–51. Epub 2008/09/02. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.08.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gavazzi G, Banfi B, Deffert C, Fiette L, Schappi M, Herrmann F, et al. Decreased blood pressure in NOX1-deficient mice. FEBS Lett. 2006;580(2):497–504. Epub 2006/01/03. 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.12.049 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kleinschnitz C, Grund H, Wingler K, Armitage ME, Jones E, Mittal M, et al. Post-stroke inhibition of induced NADPH oxidase type 4 prevents oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(9). Epub 2010/09/30. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000479 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ray R, Murdoch CE, Wang M, Santos CX, Zhang M, Alom-Ruiz S, et al. Endothelial Nox4 NADPH oxidase enhances vasodilatation and reduces blood pressure in vivo. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(6):1368–76. Epub 2011/03/19. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.219238 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Holterman CE, Thibodeau JF, Towaij C, Gutsol A, Montezano AC, Parks RJ, et al. Nephropathy and elevated BP in mice with podocyte-specific NADPH oxidase 5 expression. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(4):784–97. 10.1681/ASN.2013040371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jha JC, Banal C, Okabe J, Gray SP, Hettige T, Chow BSM, et al. NADPH Oxidase Nox5 Accelerates Renal Injury in Diabetic Nephropathy. Diabetes. 2017;66(10):2691–703. Epub 2017/07/28. 10.2337/db16-1585 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jha JC, Dai A, Holterman CE, Cooper ME, Touyz RM, Kennedy CR, et al. Endothelial or vascular smooth muscle cell-specific expression of human NOX5 exacerbates renal inflammation, fibrosis and albuminuria in the Akita mouse. Diabetologia. 2019;62(9):1712–26. Epub 2019/06/22. 10.1007/s00125-019-4924-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Montezano AC, De Lucca Camargo L, Persson P, Rios FJ, Harvey AP, Anagnostopoulou A, et al. NADPH Oxidase 5 Is a Pro-Contractile Nox Isoform and a Point of Cross-Talk for Calcium and Redox Signaling-Implications in Vascular Function. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(12). Epub 2018/06/17. 10.1161/JAHA.118.009388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Barabasi AL, Gulbahce N, Loscalzo J. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(1):56–68. Epub 2010/12/18. 10.1038/nrg2918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alcaraz N, List M, Batra R, Vandin F, Ditzel HJ, Baumbach J. De novo pathway-based biomarker identification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(16):e151 Epub 2017/09/22. 10.1093/nar/gkx642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Batra R, Alcaraz N, Gitzhofer K, Pauling J, Ditzel HJ, Hellmuth M, et al. On the performance of de novo pathway enrichment. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2017;3:6 Epub 2017/06/27. 10.1038/s41540-017-0007-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Menche J, Sharma A, Kitsak M, Ghiassian SD, Vidal M, Loscalzo J, et al. Disease networks. Uncovering disease-disease relationships through the incomplete interactome. Science. 2015;347(6224):1257601 Epub 2015/02/24. 10.1126/science.1257601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kotlyar M, Pastrello C, Malik Z, Jurisica I. IID 2018 update: context-specific physical protein-protein interactions in human, model organisms and domesticated species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D581–D9. Epub 2018/11/09. 10.1093/nar/gky1037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Huttlin EL, Bruckner RJ, Paulo JA, Cannon JR, Ting L, Baltier K, et al. Architecture of the human interactome defines protein communities and disease networks. Nature. 2017;545(7655):505–9. Epub 2017/05/18. 10.1038/nature22366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Choobdar S, Ahsen ME, Crawford J, Tomasoni M, Fang T, Lamparter D, et al. Assessment of network module identification across complex diseases. Nat Methods. 2019;16(9):843–52. Epub 2019/09/01. 10.1038/s41592-019-0509-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Arenas A, Fernández A, Gómez S. Analysis of the structure of complex networks at different resolution levels. New Journal of Physics. 2008;10(5):053039 10.1088/1367-2630/10/5/053039 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jiang P, Singh M. SPICi: a fast clustering algorithm for large biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(8):1105–11. Epub 2010/02/27. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dignat-George F, Boulanger CM. The many faces of endothelial microparticles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(1):27–33. Epub 2010/12/17. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.218123 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aguirre-Plans J, Pinero J, Menche J, Sanz F, Furlong LI, Schmidt H, et al. Proximal Pathway Enrichment Analysis for Targeting Comorbid Diseases via Network Endopharmacology. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2018;11(3). Epub 2018/06/23. 10.3390/ph11030061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mazein A, Ostaszewski M, Kuperstein I, Watterson S, Le Novere N, Lefaudeux D, et al. Systems medicine disease maps: community-driven comprehensive representation of disease mechanisms. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2018;4:21 Epub 2018/06/07. 10.1038/s41540-018-0059-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Burns NS, Miller PW. Learning What We Didn't Know—The SPRINT Data Analysis Challenge. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2205–7. Epub 2017/04/27. 10.1056/NEJMp1705323 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Holterman CE, Read NC, Kennedy CR. Nox and renal disease. Clin Sci (Lond). 2015;128(8):465–81. Epub 2015/01/30. 10.1042/CS20140361 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Saenz-Medina J, Munoz M, Sanchez A, Rodriguez C, Jorge E, Corbacho C, et al. Nox1-derived oxidative stress as a common pathogenic link between obesity and hyperoxaluria-related kidney injury. Urolithiasis. 2019. Epub 2019/11/07. 10.1007/s00240-019-01170-w . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Munoz M, Lopez-Oliva ME, Rodriguez C, Martinez MP, Saenz-Medina J, Sanchez A, et al. Differential contribution of Nox1, Nox2 and Nox4 to kidney vascular oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in obesity. Redox Biol. 2020;28:101330 Epub 2019/09/29. 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Forstermann U, Munzel T. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular disease: from marvel to menace. Circulation. 2006;113(13):1708–14. Epub 2006/04/06. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.602532 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Perticone F, Sciacqua A, Maio R, Perticone M, Maas R, Boger RH, et al. Asymmetric dimethylarginine, L-arginine, and endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(3):518–23. Epub 2005/08/02. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.040 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sonmez A, Celebi G, Erdem G, Tapan S, Genc H, Tasci I, et al. Plasma apelin and ADMA Levels in patients with essential hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010;32(3):179–83. Epub 2010/05/28. 10.3109/10641960903254505 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Casas AI, Kleikers PW, Geuss E, Langhauser F, Adler T, Busch DH, et al. Calcium-dependent blood-brain barrier breakdown by NOX5 limits postreperfusion benefit in stroke. J Clin Invest. 2019;130:1772–8. Epub 2019/03/19. 10.1172/JCI124283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bubikat A, De Windt LJ, Zetsche B, Fabritz L, Sickler H, Eckardt D, et al. Local atrial natriuretic peptide signaling prevents hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy in endothelial nitric-oxide synthase-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(22):21594–9. Epub 2005/03/29. 10.1074/jbc.M501103200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Godecke A, Decking UK, Ding Z, Hirchenhain J, Bidmon HJ, Godecke S, et al. Coronary hemodynamics in endothelial NO synthase knockout mice. Circ Res. 1998;82(2):186–94. Epub 1998/02/19. 10.1161/01.res.82.2.186 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Devereux RB, Pickering TG, Alderman MH, Chien S, Borer JS, Laragh JH. Left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension. Prevalence and relationship to pathophysiologic variables. Hypertension. 1987;9(2 Pt 2):II53–60. Epub 1987/02/01. 10.1161/01.hyp.9.2_pt_2.ii53 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Park JB, Schiffrin EL. Small artery remodeling is the most prevalent (earliest?) form of target organ damage in mild essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 2001;19(5):921–30. Epub 2001/06/08. 10.1097/00004872-200105000-00013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cuspidi C, Sala C, Negri F, Mancia G, Morganti A, Italian Society of H. Prevalence of left-ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension: an updated review of echocardiographic studies. J Hum Hypertens. 2012;26(6):343–9. Epub 2011/11/25. 10.1038/jhh.2011.104 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bezie Y, Lamaziere JM, Laurent S, Challande P, Cunha RS, Bonnet J, et al. Fibronectin expression and aortic wall elastic modulus in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18(7):1027–34. Epub 1998/07/22. 10.1161/01.atv.18.7.1027 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hayoz D, Rutschmann B, Perret F, Niederberger M, Tardy Y, Mooser V, et al. Conduit artery compliance and distensibility are not necessarily reduced in hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;20(1):1–6. Epub 1992/07/01. 10.1161/01.hyp.20.1.1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lacolley P, Ghodsi N, Glazer E, Challande P, Brissac AM, Safar ME, et al. Influence of graded changes in vasomotor tone on the carotid arterial mechanics in live spontaneously hypertensive rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1995;115(7):1235–44. Epub 1995/08/01. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb15031.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Intengan HD, Schiffrin EL. Structure and mechanical properties of resistance arteries in hypertension: role of adhesion molecules and extracellular matrix determinants. Hypertension. 2000;36(3):312–8. Epub 2000/09/16. 10.1161/01.hyp.36.3.312 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bussy C, Boutouyrie P, Lacolley P, Challande P, Laurent S. Intrinsic stiffness of the carotid arterial wall material in essential hypertensives. Hypertension. 2000;35(5):1049–54. Epub 2000/05/20. 10.1161/01.hyp.35.5.1049 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Laurent S, Girerd X, Mourad JJ, Lacolley P, Beck L, Boutouyrie P, et al. Elastic modulus of the radial artery wall material is not increased in patients with essential hypertension. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14(7):1223–31. Epub 1994/07/01. 10.1161/01.atv.14.7.1223 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Laurent S, Hayoz D, Trazzi S, Boutouyrie P, Waeber B, Omboni S, et al. Isobaric compliance of the radial artery is increased in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1993;11(1):89–98. Epub 1993/01/01. 10.1097/00004872-199301000-00013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Laurent S. Arterial wall hypertrophy and stiffness in essential hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 1995;26(2):355–62. Epub 1995/08/01. 10.1161/01.hyp.26.2.355 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature. 1980;288(5789):373–6. Epub 1980/11/27. 10.1038/288373a0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chennupati R, Lamers WH, Koehler SE, De Mey JG. Endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization-related relaxations diminish with age in murine saphenous arteries of both sexes. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;169(7):1486–99. Epub 2013/03/16. 10.1111/bph.12175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chennupati R, Meens MJ, Marion V, Janssen BJ, Lamers WH, De Mey JG, et al. Endothelial arginine resynthesis contributes to the maintenance of vasomotor function in male diabetic mice. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e102264 Epub 2014/07/18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0102264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chennupati R, Meens MJ, Janssen BJ, van Dijk P, Hakvoort TBM, Lamers WH, et al. Deletion of endothelial arginase 1 does not improve vasomotor function in diabetic mice. Physiol Rep. 2018;6(11):e13717 Epub 2018/06/12. 10.14814/phy2.13717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ryan MJ, Didion SP, Davis DR, Faraci FM, Sigmund CD. Endothelial dysfunction and blood pressure variability in selected inbred mouse strains. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22(1):42–8. Epub 2002/01/15. 10.1161/hq0102.101098 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gebhart V, Reiss K, Kollau A, Mayer B, Gorren ACF. Site and mechanism of uncoupling of nitric-oxide synthase: Uncoupling by monomerization and other misconceptions. Nitric Oxide. 2019;89:14–21. Epub 2019/04/26. 10.1016/j.niox.2019.04.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mendes-Silverio CB, Leiria LO, Morganti RP, Anhe GF, Marcondes S, Monica FZ, et al. Activation of haem-oxidized soluble guanylyl cyclase with BAY 60–2770 in human platelets lead to overstimulation of the cyclic GMP signaling pathway. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e47223 Epub 2012/11/13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stasch JP, Schmidt PM, Nedvetsky PI, Nedvetskaya TY, H SA, Meurer S, et al. Targeting the heme-oxidized nitric oxide receptor for selective vasodilatation of diseased blood vessels. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(9):2552–61. Epub 2006/09/07. 10.1172/JCI28371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hrabie JA, Klose JR, Wink DA, Keefer LK. New nitric oxide-releasing zwitterions derived from polyamines. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 1993;58(6):1472–6. 10.1021/jo00058a030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kietadisorn R, Juni RP, Moens AL. Tackling endothelial dysfunction by modulating NOS uncoupling: new insights into its pathogenesis and therapeutic possibilities. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2012;302(5):E481–95. Epub 2011/12/15. 10.1152/ajpendo.00540.2011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Altenhofer S, Kleikers PW, Radermacher KA, Scheurer P, Rob Hermans JJ, Schiffers P, et al. The NOX toolbox: validating the role of NADPH oxidases in physiology and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(14):2327–43. Epub 2012/06/01. 10.1007/s00018-012-1010-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Altenhofer S, Radermacher KA, Kleikers PW, Wingler K, Schmidt HH. Evolution of NADPH Oxidase Inhibitors: Selectivity and Mechanisms for Target Engagement. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2015;23(5):406–27. 10.1089/ars.2013.5814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Augsburger F, Filippova A, Rasti D, Seredenina T, Lam M, Maghzal G, et al. Pharmacological characterization of the seven human NOX isoforms and their inhibitors. Redox Biol. 2019;26:101272 Epub 2019/07/23. 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Dao VT, Elbatreek MH, Altenhofer S, Casas AI, Pachado MP, Neullens CT, et al. Isoform-selective NADPH oxidase inhibitor panel for pharmacological target validation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019. Epub 2019/12/29. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.12.038 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Frangos S, Buscombe JR. Why should we be concerned about a “g”? European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2019;46(2):519–. 10.1007/s00259-018-4204-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hornsten C, Weidung B, Littbrand H, Carlberg B, Nordstrom P, Lovheim H, et al. High blood pressure as a risk factor for incident stroke among very old people: a population-based cohort study. J Hypertens. 2016;34(10):2059–65. Epub 2016/07/20. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Guzik TJ, Chen W, Gongora MC, Guzik B, Lob HE, Mangalat D, et al. Calcium-dependent NOX5 nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase contributes to vascular oxidative stress in human coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(22):1803–9. Epub 2008/11/22. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Li H, Han X, Hu Z, Huang J, Chen J, Hixson JE, et al. Associations of NADPH oxidase-related genes with blood pressure changes and incident hypertension: The GenSalt Study. J Hum Hypertens. 2018;32(4):287–93. Epub 2018/02/22. 10.1038/s41371-018-0041-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Elbatreek MH, Pachado MP, Cuadrado A, Jandeleit-Dahm K, Schmidt H. Reactive Oxygen Comes of Age: Mechanism-Based Therapy of Diabetic End-Organ Damage. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2019. Epub 2019/04/01. 10.1016/j.tem.2019.02.006 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hermann M, Flammer A, Luscher TF. Nitric oxide in hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006;8(12 Suppl 4):17–29. Epub 2006/12/16. 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.06032.x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Helbing T, Olivier C, Bode C, Moser M, Diehl P. Role of microparticles in endothelial dysfunction and arterial hypertension. World J Cardiol. 2014;6(11):1135–9. Epub 2014/11/28. 10.4330/wjc.v6.i11.1135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shantsila E. Endothelial microparticles: a universal marker of vascular health? J Hum Hypertens. 2009;23(5):359–61. Epub 2008/11/21. 10.1038/jhh.2008.138 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Burger D, Turner M, Munkonda MN, Touyz RM. Endothelial Microparticle-Derived Reactive Oxygen Species: Role in Endothelial Signaling and Vascular Function. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:5047954 Epub 2016/06/18. 10.1155/2016/5047954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Montezano AC, Burger D, Paravicini TM, Chignalia AZ, Yusuf H, Almasri M, et al. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate reduced oxidase 5 (Nox5) regulation by angiotensin II and endothelin-1 is mediated via calcium/calmodulin-dependent, rac-1-independent pathways in human endothelial cells. Circ Res. 2010;106(8):1363–73. Epub 2010/03/27. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.216036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Yu P, Han W, Villar VA, Yang Y, Lu Q, Lee H, et al. Unique role of NADPH oxidase 5 in oxidative stress in human renal proximal tubule cells. Redox Biol. 2014;2:570–9. Epub 2014/04/02. 10.1016/j.redox.2014.01.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hahn NE, Meischl C, Kawahara T, Musters RJ, Verhoef VM, van der Velden J, et al. NOX5 expression is increased in intramyocardial blood vessels and cardiomyocytes after acute myocardial infarction in humans. Am J Pathol. 2012;180(6):2222–9. Epub 2012/04/17. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.02.018 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Holterman CE, Thibodeau JF, Kennedy CR. NADPH oxidase 5 and renal disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2015;24(1):81–7. Epub 2014/11/22. 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000081 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bouabout G, Ayme-Dietrich E, Jacob H, Champy MF, Birling MC, Pavlovic G, et al. Nox4 genetic inhibition in experimental hypertension and metabolic syndrome. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;111(1):41–52. Epub 2017/11/09. 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.03.011 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Schroder K, Zhang M, Benkhoff S, Mieth A, Pliquett R, Kosowski J, et al. Nox4 is a protective reactive oxygen species generating vascular NADPH oxidase. Circ Res. 2012;110(9):1217–25. Epub 2012/03/30. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.267054 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Veith C, Kraut S, Wilhelm J, Sommer N, Quanz K, Seeger W, et al. NADPH oxidase 4 is not involved in hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension. Pulm Circ. 2016;6(3):397–400. Epub 2016/09/30. 10.1086/687756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Brandes RP, Takac I, Schroder K. No superoxide—no stress?: Nox4, the good NADPH oxidase! Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31(6):1255–7. Epub 2011/05/20. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.226894 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Miura H, Bosnjak JJ, Ning G, Saito T, Miura M, Gutterman DD. Role for hydrogen peroxide in flow-induced dilation of human coronary arterioles. Circ Res. 2003;92(2):e31–40. Epub 2003/02/08. 10.1161/01.res.0000054200.44505.ab . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Leurgans TM, Bloksgaard M, Brewer JR, Bagatolli LA, Fredgart MH, Rosenstand K, et al. Endothelin-1 shifts the mediator of bradykinin-induced relaxation from NO to H2 O2 in resistance arteries from patients with cardiovascular disease. Br J Pharmacol. 2016;173(10):1653–64. Epub 2016/02/26. 10.1111/bph.13467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Shimokawa H. Hydrogen peroxide as an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor. Pflugers Arch. 2010;459(6):915–22. Epub 2010/02/09. 10.1007/s00424-010-0790-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Landmesser U, Dikalov S, Price SR, McCann L, Fukai T, Holland SM, et al. Oxidation of tetrahydrobiopterin leads to uncoupling of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase in hypertension. J Clin Invest. 2003;111(8):1201–9. Epub 2003/04/17. 10.1172/JCI14172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Dumitrescu C, Biondi R, Xia Y, Cardounel AJ, Druhan LJ, Ambrosio G, et al. Myocardial ischemia results in tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) oxidation with impaired endothelial function ameliorated by BH4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(38):15081–6. Epub 2007/09/13. 10.1073/pnas.0702986104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mitchell BM, Dorrance AM, Webb RC. GTP cyclohydrolase 1 inhibition attenuates vasodilation and increases blood pressure in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285(5):H2165–70. Epub 2003/07/12. 10.1152/ajpheart.00253.2003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Moro MA, Darley-Usmar VM, Lizasoain I, Su Y, Knowles RG, Radomski MW, et al. The formation of nitric oxide donors from peroxynitrite. Br J Pharmacol. 1995;116(3):1999–2004. Epub 1995/10/01. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16404.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wu M, Pritchard KA Jr., Kaminski PM, Fayngersh RP, Hintze TH, Wolin MS. Involvement of nitric oxide and nitrosothiols in relaxation of pulmonary arteries to peroxynitrite. Am J Physiol. 1994;266(5 Pt 2):H2108–13. Epub 1994/05/11. 10.1152/ajpheart.1994.266.5.H2108 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Pi X, Xie L, Portbury AL, Kumar S, Lockyer P, Li X, et al. NADPH oxidase-generated reactive oxygen species are required for stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha-stimulated angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34(9):2023–32. Epub 2014/07/06. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Zhan CD, Quiroz Y, Sindhu RK, Vaziri ND. Antioxidant-rich diet relieves hypertension and reduces renal immune infiltration in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 2003;41(2):341–6. Epub 2003/02/08. 10.1161/01.hyp.0000052833.20759.64 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Akpaffiong MJ, Taylor AA. Antihypertensive and vasodilator actions of antioxidants in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Hypertens. 1998;11(12):1450–60. Epub 1999/01/08. 10.1016/s0895-7061(98)00183-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Meng S, Cason GW, Gannon AW, Racusen LC, Manning RD Oxidative stress in Dahl salt-sensitive hypertension. Hypertension. 2003;41(6):1346–52. Epub 2003/04/30. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000070028.99408.E8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Barton M, Cosentino F, Brandes RP, Moreau P, Shaw S, Luscher TF. Anatomic heterogeneity of vascular aging: role of nitric oxide and endothelin. Hypertension. 1997;30(4):817–24. Epub 1997/10/23. 10.1161/01.hyp.30.4.817 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Matz RL, de Sotomayor MA, Schott C, Stoclet JC, Andriantsitohaina R. Vascular bed heterogeneity in age-related endothelial dysfunction with respect to NO and eicosanoids. Br J Pharmacol. 2000;131(2):303–11. Epub 2000/09/19. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Miksche LW, Miksche U, Gross F. Effect of sodium restriction on renal hypertension and on renin activity in the rat. Circ Res. 1970;27(6):973–84. Epub 1970/12/01. 10.1161/01.res.27.6.973 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Wang S, Xu J, Song P, Wu Y, Zhang J, Chul Choi H, et al. Acute inhibition of guanosine triphosphate cyclohydrolase 1 uncouples endothelial nitric oxide synthase and elevates blood pressure. Hypertension. 2008;52(3):484–90. Epub 2008/07/23. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.112094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Podjarny E, Hasdan G, Bernheim J, Rashid G, Green J, Korzets Z, et al. Effect of chronic tetrahydrobiopterin supplementation on blood pressure and proteinuria in 5/6 nephrectomized rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19(9):2223–7. Epub 2004/07/15. 10.1093/ndt/gfh383 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Sundberg JP, Berndt A, Sundberg BA, Silva KA, Kennedy V, Bronson R, et al. The mouse as a model for understanding chronic diseases of aging: the histopathologic basis of aging in inbred mice. Pathobiol Aging Age Relat Dis. 2011;1 Epub 2011/01/01. 10.3402/pba.v1i0.7179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Porkert M, Sher S, Reddy U, Cheema F, Niessner C, Kolm P, et al. Tetrahydrobiopterin: a novel antihypertensive therapy. J Hum Hypertens. 2008;22(6):401–7. Epub 2008/03/07. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002329 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.McRae MP. High-dose folic acid supplementation effects on endothelial function and blood pressure in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Chiropr Med. 2009;8(1):15–24. Epub 2009/08/04. 10.1016/j.jcm.2008.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kong X, Huang X, Zhao M, Xu B, Xu R, Song Y, et al. Platelet Count Affects Efficacy of Folic Acid in Preventing First Stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):2136–46. Epub 2018/05/12. 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.072 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Huo Y, Li J, Qin X, Huang Y, Wang X, Gottesman RF, et al. Efficacy of folic acid therapy in primary prevention of stroke among adults with hypertension in China: the CSPPT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(13):1325–35. Epub 2015/03/17. 10.1001/jama.2015.2274 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wang WW, Wang XS, Zhang ZR, He JC, Xie CL. A Meta-Analysis of Folic Acid in Combination with Anti-Hypertension Drugs in Patients with Hypertension and Hyperhomocysteinemia. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:585 Epub 2017/09/16. 10.3389/fphar.2017.00585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Hsu CY, Huang PH, Chiang CH, Leu HB, Huang CC, Chen JW, et al. Increased circulating endothelial apoptotic microparticle to endothelial progenitor cell ratio is associated with subsequent decline in glomerular filtration rate in hypertensive patients. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7):e68644 Epub 2013/07/23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0068644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Huang PH, Huang SS, Chen YH, Lin CP, Chiang KH, Chen JS, et al. Increased circulating CD31+/annexin V+ apoptotic microparticles and decreased circulating endothelial progenitor cell levels in hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria. J Hypertens. 2010;28(8):1655–65. Epub 2010/06/04. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833a4d0a . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Shang F, Wang SC, Hsu CY, Miao Y, Martin M, Yin Y, et al. MicroRNA-92a Mediates Endothelial Dysfunction in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(11):3251–61. Epub 2017/07/12. 10.1681/ASN.2016111215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Chen Z, Wen L, Martin M, Hsu CY, Fang L, Lin FM, et al. Oxidative stress activates endothelial innate immunity via sterol regulatory element binding protein 2 (SREBP2) transactivation of microRNA-92a. Circulation. 2015;131(9):805–14. Epub 2015/01/01. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.013675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Wang Y, Thorin E, Luo H, Tremblay J, Lavoie JL, Wu Z, et al. EPHB4 Protein Expression in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Regulates Their Contractility, and EPHB4 Deletion Leads to Hypotension in Mice. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(22):14235–44. Epub 2015/04/24. 10.1074/jbc.M114.621615 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Xu P, Costa-Goncalves AC, Todiras M, Rabelo LA, Sampaio WO, Moura MM, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and elevated blood pressure in MAS gene-deleted mice. Hypertension. 2008;51(2):574–80. Epub 2008/01/09. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.102764 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Shirey-Rice JK, Klar R, Fentress HM, Redmon SN, Sabb TR, Krueger JJ, et al. Norepinephrine transporter variant A457P knock-in mice display key features of human postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6(4):1001–11. Epub 2013/04/13. 10.1242/dmm.012203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Lazor R, Feihl F, Waeber B, Kucera P, Perret C. Endothelin-1 does not mediate the endothelium-dependent hypoxic contractions of small pulmonary arteries in rats. Chest. 1996;110(1):189–97. Epub 1996/07/01. 10.1378/chest.110.1.189 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Bloksgaard M, Leurgans TM, Spronck B, Heusinkveld MHG, Thorsted B, Rosenstand K, et al. Imaging and modeling of acute pressure-induced changes of collagen and elastin microarchitectures in pig and human resistance arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017;313(1):H164–H78. Epub 2017/04/23. 10.1152/ajpheart.00110.2017 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Pourageaud F, De Mey JG. Structural properties of rat mesenteric small arteries after 4-wk exposure to elevated or reduced blood flow. Am J Physiol. 1997;273(4):H1699–706. Epub 1997/11/15. 10.1152/ajpheart.1997.273.4.H1699 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Scott DW. Sturges' rule. Wire computational statistics. 2009;1(3):303–6. 10.1002/wics.35. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Di Jiang, PhD

4 Feb 2020

Dear Dr Elbatreek,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript entitled "NOX5-induced uncoupling of endothelial NO synthase is a causal mechanism and theragnostic target of an age-related hypertension endotype" for consideration as a Research Article by PLOS Biology.

We were interested in the data showing that that Nox5-knock in mice had elevated blood pressure with age, with evidence for defective vasorelaxation in femoral arteries. Regrettably, however, given the known role of Nox5 in other models related to hypertension, including stroke and myocardial infarction, the study was not felt to represent the strength of advance that we seek in PLOS Biology papers.

While we cannot consider your manuscript further for publication in PLOS Biology, we suggest, as an alternative, that you consider transferring this manuscript to PLOS ONE (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/).

PLOS ONE is a peer-reviewed journal that accepts scientifically sound primary research. The review process at PLOS ONE differs from other PLOS journals in that it does not judge the perceived impact of the work or whether this falls within a particular area of research. Rather, it focuses on whether the study has been performed and reported to high scientific and ethical standards, and whether the data support the conclusions. This approach helps to eliminate the rejection cycles that authors commonly encounter when submitting to one journal after another. Please note that the journals are editorially independent and we therefore cannot guarantee the outcome if you choose to pursue a transfer.

If you would like to submit your work to PLOS ONE, please click the following link:

<DeepLinkData><DeepLinkTypeID>27</DeepLinkTypeID><peopleID>1214449</peopleID><userSecurityID>6e2a942e-1360-4ac1-bf03-ac9748786e60</userSecurityID><documentID>39237</documentID><revision>0</revision><manuscriptNumber>PBIOLOGY-D-20-00252</manuscriptNumber><docSecurityID>3bca3841-0fd2-4088-bd08-6386fb3369fd</docSecurityID></DeepLinkData>

If you do NOT wish to submit your work to PLOS ONE, please click this link to decline:

<DeepLinkData><DeepLinkTypeID>28</DeepLinkTypeID><peopleID>1214449</peopleID><userSecurityID>6e2a942e-1360-4ac1-bf03-ac9748786e60</userSecurityID><documentID>39237</documentID><revision>0</revision><manuscriptNumber>PBIOLOGY-D-20-00252</manuscriptNumber><docSecurityID>3bca3841-0fd2-4088-bd08-6386fb3369fd</docSecurityID></DeepLinkData>

Should you choose to transfer your submission to PLOS ONE, you will receive a confirmation email within 24-48 hours of accepting the transfer. Please note, all PLOS journals are editorially independent and vary in submission requirements. Your submission details and manuscript files will be transferred automatically; once in the PLOS ONE Editorial Manager site, your submission will be returned to you and you will be asked to provide additional information before you can finalize your new submission to PLOS ONE. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the journal at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.

Sincerely,

Di Jiang,

Associate Editor

PLOS Biology

Decision Letter 1

Di Jiang, PhD

20 Mar 2020

Dear Dr Elbatreek,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "NOX5-induced uncoupling of endothelial NO synthase is a causal mechanism and theragnostic target of an age-related hypertension endotype" for consideration as a Research Article at PLOS Biology. Your manuscript has been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors, an Academic Editor with relevant expertise, and by four independent reviewers.

In light of the reviews (below), we will not be able to accept the current version of the manuscript, but we would welcome re-submission of a much-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments. We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent for further evaluation by the reviewers, and we might involve new reviewers, should the original reviewers become unavailable, to assess your response to the comments in the first round of review.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within 2 months.

Please email us (plosbiology@plos.org) if you have any questions or concerns, or would like to request an extension. At this stage, your manuscript remains formally under active consideration at our journal; please notify us by email if you do not intend to submit a revision so that we may end consideration of the manuscript at PLOS Biology.

**IMPORTANT - SUBMITTING YOUR REVISION**

Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. Please submit the following files along with your revised manuscript:

1. A 'Response to Reviewers' file - this should detail your responses to the editorial requests, present a point-by-point response to all of the reviewers' comments, and indicate the changes made to the manuscript.

*NOTE: In your point by point response to the reviewers, please provide the full context of each review. Do not selectively quote paragraphs or sentences to reply to. The entire set of reviewer comments should be present in full and each specific point should be responded to individually, point by point.

You should also cite any additional relevant literature that has been published since the original submission and mention any additional citations in your response.

2. In addition to a clean copy of the manuscript, please also upload a 'track-changes' version of your manuscript that specifies the edits made. This should be uploaded as a "Related" file type.

*Re-submission Checklist*

When you are ready to resubmit your revised manuscript, please refer to this re-submission checklist: https://plos.io/Biology_Checklist

To submit a revised version of your manuscript, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' where you will find your submission record.

Please make sure to read the following important policies and guidelines while preparing your revision:

*Published Peer Review*

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*PLOS Data Policy*

Please note that as a condition of publication PLOS' data policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability) requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions arrived at in your manuscript. If you have not already done so, you must include any data used in your manuscript either in appropriate repositories, within the body of the manuscript, or as supporting information (N.B. this includes any numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.). For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5

*Blot and Gel Data Policy*

We require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare them now, if you have not already uploaded them. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive thus far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Di Jiang, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Biology

*****************************************************

REVIEWS:

Reviewer #1: In this study, mice with Nox5 knocked in were studied and found to have hypertension with age. Some evidence for NOS uncoupling was shown. There are multiple questions that arise upon reading the manuscript which detract.

Your statement in the intro regarding renal artery stenosis as the only cause of hypertension with a known mechanism is wrong. Other known causes include adrenal adenomas, pheochromocytomas and numerous single gene mutations involving renal transporters.

The statement: " . . . antihypertensive therapy is neither curative nor effective, needing high numbers to treat with many patients still experiencing adverse outcomes" doesn't make sense. Do you mean that therapy requires high doses of drugs or several agents to achieve target pressures?

The machine learning/prunned network analysis is only hypothesis generating. An important experimental finding is that Nox5 is highly expressed in human microparticles. It is essential that the investigators show that there is not an increase in other Nox isoforms in these microparticles.

It seems odd that there is no cardiac hypertrophy in the Nox5 KI mice given that they are hypertensive.

It is unclear how the diameter tension relationships were constructed in figure S2. It seems these are just tensions at different degrees of stretch in the wire myograph. This is a very crude way to determine stress strain relationships, which should be analyzed in pressurized vascular segments as described by Humphrey and co-workers.1 It is very unusual that there is not vascular stiffening in the Nox5 mice, if they are really hypertensive.

The evidence that sepiapterin improves endothelium-dependent vasodilatation is only partial support that NOS uncoupling has occurred. Can the authors show an increase in vascular superoxide production that is inhibited by L-NAME? Can they demonstrate that the NOS3 enzyme migrates as a monomer on low temperature gel? Would treatment with sepiapterin lower blood pressure?

The differences in endothelium-dependent vasodilatation between the femoral artery (affected) and the saphenous artery and aorta (not affected) is hard to understand. It is known that branch vessels are less dependent on NO, but this should affect the saphenous and femoral arteries similarly.

The degree of acetylcholine mediated relaxation in the saphenous artery (figure 3b) seems very impaired. Normally vessels of this size relax at least by 60 to 75%. This is also true for the responses in 3A.

What is the significance of the inhibition of PE contraction by indomethacin? This would suggest a role of some vasoconstrictor prostanoid, but which one? How does this relate to Nox5?

1. Ferruzzi J, Bersi MR, Humphrey JD. Biomechanical phenotyping of central arteries in health and disease: advantages of and methods for murine models. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41:1311-1330.

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript, the authors show that hypertensive, microalbuminuric human subjects have increased expression of NOX5. Mouse NOX5KI exhibit increases in systolic BP with aging, and treatment of vasculature from these mice vasodilate in response to sepiapterin. The authors conclude that it is NOX5 that is mediating the hypertenison in both humans and mice.

Suggestions for revision:

1. The authors should show telemetry BP in mice for at least 5 days and show mean arterial BP (MAP). Does MAP change with aging in NOX5KI mice compared to controls.

2. Does treatment of mice with sepiapterin decrease BP in aging NOX5KI mice?

These studies are necessary to support the authors' hypothesis.

Reviewer #3: The paper entitled NOX5-induced uncoupling of endothelial NO synthase is a causal mechanism and theragnostic target of an age-related hypertension endotype by Elbatreek et al describes a novel role of the superoxide-generating NOX5 isoform as a cause of increased blood pressure in aged mice overexpressing the human NOX5 isoform (NOX5 KI mice)and finds a correlation of increased NOX5 levels in endothelial microparticles with hypertensive patients as well as a potential mechanism by an in silico interactome approach showing a close interation between NOX5 and nitic oxide signalling using human data. Finally, using an ex-vivo pharmacological approach using vessels purified from NOX5 KI mice, they confirm the connection between NOX5-derived ROS and the uncoupling of endothelial NO synthase by recoupling NOS with sepiapterin

The paper is well-written and the methods are sound. It uses human and mouse in vivo and ex vivo data and provides several novel important findings, in particular, the measurement of circulating microparticular NOX5 as a biomarker in a subpopulation of hypertensive patients, providing valuable tool for stratification of potential future clinical trials. Also the spontaneous hypertensive phenotype in NOX5 KI mice is of great interest for further testing of preclinical drugs. Finally the mechanism described is of great interest-at least in this model.

Altogether, the paper can be recommended for publication if the comments below are answered satisfactorily.

Major:

1. Several statements in the discussion are very strong and mix the findings from human clinical samples and results obtained with mice overexpressing NOX5, a rather artificial system. For example, the mechanism of uncoupling NO synthase by NOX5 has indeed not be proven in humans. The discussion would benefit from a more balanced interpretation and should also highlight potential pitfalls of the animal model.

2. In a previous paper (Casas et al, 2019) describing the NOX5 KI model, the same authors show high expression levels of NOX5 in white blood cells. First, this fact should be documented in the present study and the authors should comment on how they exclude a potential effect of leukocytic NOX5 on hypertension in aged animals as the ex vivo data do not solely exclude this.

3. Addition of antioxidants or the pharmacological tool DPI to the ex vivo experiments would be an asset. Has it be done? Have these compounds been tested? These data should be added whatever the outcome and interpreted accordingly.

4. NOX5 is known to be expressed in leucocytes. Is it possible that some contaminating white blood cells are present in endothelial microparticles. How was this excluded?

Minor:

Page 12, figure S4. Page 13, lanes 216-225: document in the text the concentrations used for PAPA/NO, BAY 60-2770 and sepiapterin

Page 17, lane 297: Here NOX5 is important….: sentence is not clear. What the "here" refer to?

Page 15-17. What are the chances of administering sepiapterin in patients?

Page 22. It is nowadays standard practice to document the sex of the animals used. Have both genders been used in the study? Was blood pressure similar in males and females? Was there a reason to select one gender over another one?

Reviewer #4: Interactome modularity based analysis is acceptable.

Figure is not of sufficiently good resolution. The printout was not readable. Please provide high resolution image.

Decision Letter 2

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

10 Aug 2020

Dear Dr Elbatreek,

Thank you for submitting your revised Research Article entitled "NOX5-induced uncoupling of endothelial NO synthase is a causal mechanism and theragnostic target of an age-related hypertension endotype" for publication in PLOS Biology. I have now obtained advice from the original reviewers and have discussed their comments with the Academic Editor. Please note that reviewer 4 was replaced by a new reviewer 5, who was granted access to the peer-review history.

Based on the reviews, we will probably accept this manuscript for publication, assuming that you will modify the manuscript to address the remaining points raised by the reviewers. Please also make sure to address the data and other policy-related requests noted at the end of this email.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within two weeks. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. Please submit the following files along with your revised manuscript:

1. A 'Response to Reviewers' file - this should detail your responses to the editorial requests, present a point-by-point response to all of the reviewers' comments, and indicate the changes made to the manuscript.

*NOTE: In your point by point response to the reviewers, please provide the full context of each review. Do not selectively quote paragraphs or sentences to reply to. The entire set of reviewer comments should be present in full and each specific point should be responded to individually, point by point.

2. In addition to a clean copy of the manuscript, please also upload a 'track-changes' version of your manuscript that specifies the edits made. This should be uploaded as a "Related" file type.

In addition to the remaining revisions and before we will be able to formally accept your manuscript and consider it "in press", we also need to ensure that your article conforms to our guidelines. A member of our team will be in touch shortly with a set of requests. As we can't proceed until these requirements are met, your swift response will help prevent delays to publication.

*Copyediting*

Upon acceptance of your article, your final files will be copyedited and typeset into the final PDF. While you will have an opportunity to review these files as proofs, PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling or significant scientific errors. Therefore, please take this final revision time to assess and make any remaining major changes to your manuscript.

NOTE: If Supporting Information files are included with your article, note that these are not copyedited and will be published as they are submitted. Please ensure that these files are legible and of high quality (at least 300 dpi) in an easily accessible file format. For this reason, please be aware that any references listed in an SI file will not be indexed. For more information, see our Supporting Information guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/supporting-information

*Published Peer Review History*

Please note that you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*Early Version*

Please note that an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you opted out when submitting your manuscript. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online, uncheck the box. Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us as soon as possible if you or your institution is planning to press release the article.

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

*Submitting Your Revision*

To submit your revision, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' to find your submission record. Your revised submission must include a cover letter, a Response to Reviewers file that provides a detailed response to the reviewers' comments (if applicable), and a track-changes file indicating any changes that you have made to the manuscript.

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Gabriel Gasque

Senior Editor

on behalf of

Ines Alvarez-Garcia, PhD,

Senior Editor,

ialvarez-garcia@plos.org,

PLOS Biology

------------------------------------------------------------------------

ETHICS STATEMENT:

Please indicate within your manuscript if your human experiments approved by the research ethics committee of Taipei Veterans General Hospital adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki or any other specific national or international ethical guidelines.

Please include the full name of the IACUC/ethics committee that reviewed and approved the animal care and use protocol/permit/project license. Please also include an approval number.

Please include the specific national or international regulations/guidelines to which your animal care and use protocol adhered. Please note that institutional or accreditation organization guidelines (such as AAALAC) do not meet this requirement.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATA POLICY:

Please update your S1 Data File to provide the quantitative summary data for Fig 1CD.

Please ensure that each figure legend in your manuscript include information on where the underlying data can be found, and ensure your supplemental data file/s has a legend.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reviewer remarks:

Reviewer #1: The authors have responded to prior concerns. There continue to be a few statements that are incorrect that could be easily modified.

It is not true that Nox1 has not been shown to have a role in pre-clinical studies of hypertension. Dikalova et al showed that overexpression of this isoform potentiated hypertension in mice (PMID 16230485). Gawazzi et al showed that Nox1 deficient mice had a complete loss of the sustained hypertensive response to angiotensin II.

The authors should note that the hypertensive response with aging in the Nox5 ki mice is very similar to that observed in mice overexpressing p22phox in the vascular smooth muscle and in mice lacking the vascular smooth muscle ecSOD (see PMID 26595812).

These issues should be briefly discussed.

Reviewer #2: In this manuscript the authors provide evaluation of NOX5 and NOS3 based on human interactome analyses. They go on to develop a mouse NOX5 gene knock in into endothelial and WBCs. They find that the aging NOX5 KI mice are hypertensive, but not the young adult animals. They claim that it is the muscular conduit vessels that mediate the hypertension in the aging KI. The manuscript takes many liberties with the analyses of previous studies that are not quite correct. They also interpret data to show the importance of conduit vessels (lines 198-99) without ever measuring endothelial function in resistance vessels, particularly in the kidney that are known to control sodium handling and hypertension. Furthermore, they do not see antioxidants, tempol or N-acetyl cysteine, having any effect on vascular function/hypertension in the KI mice. The lack of antioxidant protection against the hypertension suggests that there is no NO being produced likely due to age-related endothelial dysfunction to cause a response when the ROS are removed. The authors discuss the role played by H2O2 as a vasodilator, without mentioning peroxynitrite which is a much better vasodilator.

Other issues:

1. "eNOS KO mice do not have cardiac hypertrophy". Whole body eNOS KO is developmentally lethal, isn't it?

2. "no difference in BP between males and females". The data should be shown since there are only 9 mice of both sexes that were used for MAP.

3. In the human studies, why were so few women included?

4. The authors mention that NOX1 and NOX2 do not cause hypertension unless prohypertensive drugs are given (lines 65-67)--antioxidants reduce BP in SHR and Dahl salt sensitive rats, that do not have NOX5.

5. The figures as shown in the manusscript are not of publication quality.

Reviewer #3: The authors replied to the comments satisfactorily

Reviewer #5: This paper investigates the causal link between NOX5 gene in humans and age-related pulmonary hypertension via uncoupling of endothelial NO synthase. The study starts with computational prediction of PPI networks, proceeds with analysis of control and PH patients and ends with mouse knock-in experiments (mice do not have endogenous NOX5 gene). I found the mouse results convincing, although I cannot say the same for the human results for the following reasons.

The human IID database cannot map three of the seed proteins (GUCYA1, GUCYA2, GUCYB1) and reports no experimentally validated PPIs for NOX3. So it is strange that the identified "NOX5 subnetwork; Fig 1) includes both GUCYA1 and GUCYB1. Is it a nomenclature issue? If so, the correct gene names need to be reported in the paper. If not, an explanation is warranted. Is it that they did not look for networks with experimental support? If so, they should correct the manuscript to reflect the actual search they performed.

Furthermore, NOX5 had only one study to support its PPIs. The authors should discuss the limitations of their predictive model that is based on such limited evidence. Subsequently any claims about "causality" (in the sense of direct causal effects) should be toned down as they may constitute an overstatement of the results.

Fig 1 is badly presented and it is unclear if it supports the authors' claims. First the resolution makes the axes labels unreadable. We can only guess what the authors want to say. Second, Fig 1C and 1D should probably be reversed, because one first identifies the bimodal distribution among hypertension patients and then compares the groups (unless the groups were identified with external characteristics, like albuminuria). Third, the lines with the asterisks in fig. 1C do not extend to make clear what they compare these groups to. Are they compared to the controls? Fourth the actual p-values should be provided after correction. From the bi-modal distribution presentation in Fig. 1D it looks like the first group of hypertension patients may not be so different than controls.

I wish I could clearly read Fig. 1 which is very important and especially fig 1D. What is the Y-axis? The labels are unreadable and the legend/text does not explain it clearly either. And this is supposed to be a very important evidence because they use the bimodal distribution to split the hypertensive patients into two groups. If what they measure is circulating NOX5 from endothelial cells then the first group may be not significantly different from the normal.

The control patients include no smokers and no diabetics. Smoking actually represents a significant difference between the two cohorts, but it is not discussed at all. It is well know that smoking impairs NO synthase and especially in endothelial cells. Eg:

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.atv.16.4.546

https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/full/10.1165/ajrcmb.19.5.3091

Beta-blockers and a number of other molecules are differing significantly between the three groups and should be discussed as more direct causes (or results) of the observed differences.

So overall I would say this is a very good mouse study but the importance of these results in humans is something that requires further investigation.

Decision Letter 3

Ines Alvarez-Garcia

18 Sep 2020

***EDIT THIS LETTER BEFORE SENDING***

Dear Dr Elbatreek,

On behalf of my colleagues and the Academic Editor, Cecilia W Lo, I am pleased to inform you that we will be delighted to publish your Research Article in PLOS Biology.

The files will now enter our production system. You will receive a copyedited version of the manuscript, along with your figures for a final review. You will be given two business days to review and approve the copyedit. Then, within a week, you will receive a PDF proof of your typeset article. You will have two days to review the PDF and make any final corrections. If there is a chance that you'll be unavailable during the copy editing/proof review period, please provide us with contact details of one of the other authors whom you nominate to handle these stages on your behalf. This will ensure that any requested corrections reach the production department in time for publication.

Early Version

The version of your manuscript submitted at the copyedit stage will be posted online ahead of the final proof version, unless you have already opted out of the process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

PRESS

We frequently collaborate with press offices. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. If the press office is planning to promote your findings, we would be grateful if they could coordinate with biologypress@plos.org. If you have not yet opted out of the early version process, we ask that you notify us immediately of any press plans so that we may do so on your behalf.

We also ask that you take this opportunity to read our Embargo Policy regarding the discussion, promotion and media coverage of work that is yet to be published by PLOS. As your manuscript is not yet published, it is bound by the conditions of our Embargo Policy. Please be aware that this policy is in place both to ensure that any press coverage of your article is fully substantiated and to provide a direct link between such coverage and the published work. For full details of our Embargo Policy, please visit http://www.plos.org/about/media-inquiries/embargo-policy/.

Thank you again for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Biology and for your support of Open Access publishing. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can provide any assistance during the production process.

Kind regards,

Vita Usova

Publication Assistant,

PLOS Biology

on behalf of

Ines Alvarez-Garcia,

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Levels of NOX1, NOX2, NOX4, and ADMA in normotensive and hypertensive individuals.

    (A–C) There were no differences in NOX1, NOX2, or NOX4 levels between hypertensive patients with normoalbuminuria (n = 20) compared to normotensive individuals (n = 20). NOX1 levels were higher (A), but NOX2 were lower (B) in hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria (n = 20) compared to normotensive individuals. Comparison between groups was done by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. (D) ADMA levels were significantly higher in hypertensive patients (n = 40) compared to healthy individuals (n = 20). Comparison between the two groups was done by two-tailed unpaired t test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. MAP in young and aged WT and KI mice.

    (A) There was no significant difference in MAP between young WT (n = 19) and KI (n = 20). (B) Aged KI mice (n = 33) had higher MAP compared to WT (n = 31). Telemetry data were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals **p < 0.01. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Body and organ weights in aged WT and KI mice.

    (A–E) There was no difference in body, heart, and kidney weights between WT (n = 24) and KI mice (n = 20); however, lung/body weight ratio was higher in KI mice. Comparison between groups were done by two-tailed unpaired t test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals *p < 0.05.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Arterial stiffness in aged WT and KI mice.

    (A–C) The relation between resting wall tension and arterial lumen diameter did not differ between KI (n = 9) and WT (n = 9) mice in thoracic aortae (A), femoral arteries (B), and saphenous arteries (C). All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Ach-induced relaxations in arteries of aged WT and KI mice.

    (A–C) Ach-induced relaxations were impaired in femoral arteries (A) of aged KI mice (n = 9) compared to WT (n = 8–9) but not in saphenous arteries (B) and thoracic aortae (with/without indomethacin) (C) precontracted with K+. (D–F) Ach-induced relaxations were impaired in femoral arteries (D) of aged KI mice (n = 9) compared to WT (n = 8–9) but not in saphenous arteries (E) and thoracic aortae with/without indomethacin (F) precontracted with endothelin-1. (G) There was no difference in Ach-induced relaxations in thoracic aortae (with/without indomethacin) precontracted with phenylephrine between WT (n = 9) and KI mice (n = 9). (H–J) Ach-induced relaxations in arteries made to contract with endothelin-1 were reversed by 100 μM L-NAME in femoral arteries (H) and thoracic aortae (I), but not saphenous arteries (J) of both aged KI mice (n = 8–9) and WT (n = 8–9). Myograph data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals, *p < 0.05. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. qPCR of NOX5 in TAO, FAs, and SAs of aged KI mice.

    There was no difference in NOX5 gene expression between the 3 vessel types (n = 3, each in duplicates). Comparison were done by one-way ANOVA. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file. FA, femoral artery; SA, saphenous artery; TAO, thoracic aortae.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Contractile responses in arteries of aged WT and KI mice.

    There was no difference in contractile responses to K+, phenylephrine, and endothelin-1 in femoral arteries (A–C), saphenous arteries (D–F), and thoracic aortae (with/without indomethacin) (G–I) between WT (n = 8–9) and KI mice (n = 9). Comparison between 2 groups in contractile responses to K+ was done by two-tailed t test. Other myograph data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

    (TIF)

    S8 Fig. Endothelium-independent relaxations in arteries of aged WT and KI mice.

    (A–C) Relaxations induced by the NO donor, PAPA NO (0.01–10 μM), in femoral arteries (A), saphenous arteries (B), and thoracic aortae (with/without indomethacin) (C) did not differ between WT (n = 8–9) and KI mice (n = 9). (D) Relaxations induced by the apo-sGC activator, Bay60-2770 (0.01–10 μM), in femoral arteries did not differ between WT (n = 4) and KI mice (n = 4). Myograph data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

    (TIF)

    S9 Fig. Representative images of DHE staining of femoral arteries of aged WT and KI mice.

    (TIF)

    S10 Fig. Ach-induced relaxations in femoral arteries of aged KI mice treated with antioxidants.

    In segments of femoral artery (n = 3–6) made to contract with 10 μM phenylephrine, relaxing effects of Ach (10 μM) were not reversed by 10 μM N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (A) or 100 μM tempol (B). Comparison between groups were done by two-tailed unpaired t test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

    (TIF)

    S11 Fig. Echocardiography in aged WT and KI mice.

    There were no differences in all parameters between WT (n = 28) and KI mice (n = 29). Comparison between groups were done by two-tailed unpaired t test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

    (TIF)

    S12 Fig. Arteries diameter in aged WT and KI mice.

    There were no differences in diameter of thoracic aortae (A), femoral arteries (B), and saphenous arteries (with/without indomethacin) between WT (n = 9) and KI mice (n = 9). Comparison between groups were done by two-tailed unpaired t test. All data are represented as mean ± SEM of n individual animals. All raw data are included in the S1 Data file.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Baseline characteristics in healthy individuals and hypertensive patients of the second cohort.

    Values are mean ± SD or number (%). BMI, body mass index; LDL, low density lipoprotein.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. qPCR assays.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Data. Numerical raw data.

    All numerical raw data are combined in a single Excel file, “S1_Data.xlsx.” This file consists of several spreadsheets. Each spreadsheet contains the raw data of one table, figure, or subfigure as indicated.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Appeal rebuttal letter.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: NOX5_Response to Editor and Reviewers comments_v8.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers comments_v3.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. For in silico data, we used the interactome from IID database which is available at http://ophid.utoronto.ca/iid. For computational data analysis, the MONET tool (https://github.com/BergmannLab/MONET) and SPICi tool (https://compbio.cs.princeton.edu/spici/) were used.


    Articles from PLoS Biology are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES