Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Jun 26;40:70–84. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.06.004

Altered miRNA landscape of the anterior cingulate cortex is associated with potential loss of key neuronal functions in depressed brain

Yoshino Yuta 1,1, Bhaskar Roy 1,1, Yogesh Dwivedi 1,*
PMCID: PMC7655604  NIHMSID: NIHMS1604074  PMID: 32600964

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a family of non-coding RNAs, have recently gained a considerable attention in neuropsychiatric disorders. Being a pleiotropic modulator of target gene(s), miRNA has been recognized as central to downstream gene regulatory networks. In the recent past, reports have suggested their role in changing the epigenetic landscape in brain of subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD). Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is a brain area implicated in several complex cognitive functions, such as impulse control, emotion, and decision-making and is associated with psychopathology associated with mood regulation. In this study, we examined whether MDD is associated with altered miRNA transcriptome in ACC and whether altered miRNA landscape is associated with modifications in specific gene network(s) at the functional level. Using next generation sequencing, it was observed that that 117 miRNAs (4.61%) were significantly upregulated and 54 (2.13%) were downregulated in MDD subjects (n=22) compared with non-psychiatric controls (n=25). Using 24 most significantly upregulated miRNAs in the MDD group, we determined functional enrichment of target genes and found them to be associated with long-term potentiation, neurotrophin signaling, and axon guidance. Intra- and inter-cluster similarities of enriched terms based on overrepresented gene list showed neurobiological functions associated with neuronal growth and survival. Web centric parameters and ontology enrichment functions identified two major domains related to phosphatidyl signaling, GTPase signaling, neuronal migration, and neurotrophin signaling. Our findings of altered miRNA landscape along with a shift in targetome relate to previously reported morphometric changes and neuronal atrophy in ACC of MDD subjects.

Keywords: Anterior cingulate cortex, major depressive disorder, miRNA-seq, in-silico analysis, gene enrichment

1. Introduction

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the debilitating mental disorders worldwide and the lifetime prevalence is 10.8% (Lim et al., 2018). Despite concerted efforts, the neurobiology of depression is not well understood, which is also reflected in the poor outcome of the current medication for MDD (Blackburn, 2019). Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is a brain area responsible for psychopathology associated with emotion regulation (Stevens et al., 2011). Neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies have strongly suggested the role of ACC in processing of emotional and sensory cues from various brain regions implicated in mood regulation (Pizzagalli et al., 2001; Wu et al., 2016). The critical role of ACC in mood regulation is further substantiated by the findings of significant changes in its morphology in MDD subjects (Drevets et al., 2008). Morphometric changes along with decreased gray matter volume in the subgenual region of ACC have been associated with both unipolar and bipolar depression (Wise et al., 2017). The largest worldwide study conducted by ENIGMA MDD Working Group detected gray matter loss in the orbitofrontal cortex, anterior and posterior cingulate, insula and temporal lobes (Schmaal et al., 2017). Additionally, smaller gray matter volume of ACC and bilateral insula have been reported in MDD subjects compared to bipolar subjects as well as healthy controls (Wise et al., 2017). Several rodent studies have also shown that gray matter reduction is strongly associated with dendritic atrophy and reductions of glia cells under the stressful condition (Radley et al., 2008; Wellman, 2001). The ACC has several functions such as attentional orienting, affective processing, and behavioral selection (Bush et al., 2000). As an integration center, ACC includes several important processing modules which help in controlling the cognitive and emotional network with afferent and efferent projections. Past studies have also suggested ACC related GABAergic deficiency in both adult and adolescent MDD brains (Gabbay et al., 2012; Price et al., 2009). Glutamatergic dysfunctionality has also been shown in ACC of adult MDD subjects (Cotter et al., 2002). These changes could be associated with altered gene functionality, as has previously been shown in other brain regions of MDD subjects (Malki et al., 2015; Roy et al., 2017b). A strong possibility of epigenetic regulation of aberrant gene expression cannot be ruled out given that environmental risk factors are critical in the complex behavioral outcomes associated with mood disorders (Wang et al., 2018). Moreover, several studies have examined MDD in the context of suicidal behavior and found to be driven by adverse environmental influence. It is important to mention that emotional turmoil in survivors of patients who died by suicide may last for a long time, and in some cases, may end with their own suicide. Thus, it is fundamental to understand the bereavement process after the suicide of a significant other in order to provide proper care, reduce stigma, and improve the outcomes. Although the role of miRNAs is not well understood in the bereavement process or in their link to MDD leading to suicidal behavior (Pompili et al., 2013), postmortem brain studies provide critical information regarding completed suicide, which may help explain the molecular changes happening in the brain under such conditions. Recently, numerous studies have shown that non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs), can have significant epigenetic influence in the development of psychiatric disorders such as MDD (Briggs et al., 2015; Kocerha et al., 2015; Qureshi and Mehler, 2013; Roy et al., 2017a; Salta and De Strooper, 2012; Sartor et al., 2012). A recent qPCR-based study using a set of 29 miRNAs identified downregulation of two miRNAs (miR-184 and miR-34a) in the ACC of MDD subjects (Azevedo et al., 2016). However, the involvement of miRNA-mediated epigenetic regulation of altered ACC functions in MDD has not been evaluated in greater detail at transcriptome-wide level. In the present study, we examined transcriptome-wide differential regulation of miRNAs in a relatively large number of ACC samples from non-psychiatric controls (n=25) and MDD subjects (n=22) using miRNA-sequencing. Subsequently, the KEGG based pathway and gene ontology (GO) analysis were done based on predicted targets of top significantly altered miRNAs in the MDD group. The results helped us to comprehend the functional role of ACC-specific miRNA changes in MDD pathogenesis.

2. Experimental procedures

2.1. Subjects

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) under exemption 4. The study was performed in ACC obtained from the New South Wales Brain Tissue Resource Centre at the University of Sydney. ACC from a total of 25 non-psychiatric controls (hereafter referred as controls) and 22 MDD subjects were used. Detailed demographic and clinical characteristics of subjects are shown in Table 1. Demographic data included age, gender, race, postmortem interval (PMI), brain pH, cause of death, history of drug/alcohol abuse, and antidepressant toxicology at the time of death. There were no significant differences in age, PMI, brain pH between MDD and control subjects (Table 1). MDD group had 12 males and 10 females whereas control group had 15 males and 10 females. Within the MDD group, 10 subjects died by suicide and 12 died by causes other than suicide. Also, out of 22 MDD subjects, 4 had a history of alcohol abuse and 18 showed positive antidepressant toxicology at the time of death.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of control and MDD subjects

Control MDD p-value
Number of subjects 25 22 N/A
Age (Year) 50.8 ± 10.6 51.6 ± 12.9 0.809
Gender Male 15 12 N/A
Female 10 10
Postmortem interval (Hour) 28.5 ± 15.3 29.5 ± 9.7 0.781
Brain pH 6.5 ± 0.4 6.6 ± 0.3 0.328
Alcohol abuse 0 4 N/A
Antidepressant drugs 0 18 N/A
Suicide 0 10 N/A
Cause of death Cardiac arrest, respiratory failure Cardiac arrest, cancer, trauma, hepatic abnormalities, Ischemic bowel N/A
Method of suicide N/A Drug toxicity, hanging

Values denote mean ± standard deviation. MDD: Major Depressive Disorder, N/A: not applicable.

Detailed tissue dissection, preservation, quality control and detailed in earlier publications (Dedova et al., 2009; Sheedy et al., 2008). Briefly, the cerebrum, cerebellum and brainstem are divided in the sagittal plane. The cerebellar hemisphere and brainstem were removed from each cerebral hemisphere by transversely sectioning the brainstem through the rostral midbrain at the level of the superior colliculi. Each cerebral hemisphere and its contralateral cerebellar hemisphere and brainstem were assigned a “fresh” or “fixed” status on a random basis. The fresh hemisphere was cut into 1 cm coronal slices and several areas were dissected including ACC and digitally photographed. The tissue blocks and were frozen on precooled trays at a temperature of −80°C and were bagged into air-tight plastic bags. Detailed neuropathological examination was done for several brain regions. Blood samples taken at the time of autopsy were used for toxicology screens for therapeutic drugs. toxicology including neuroleptics, paracetamol, and anti-depressants. Several assessments including, diagnostic characterization, review of agonal status, measurement of brain tissue pH, histological assessment of post-mortem autolysis and a full neuropathological to ensure the tissue integrity. Brain tissue pH was measured in cerebellar tissue (Harrison et al., 1995).

The post-mortem clinical diagnosis of each case was determined through extensive review of medical records by one of two independent clinicians. All psychiatric cases were confirmed by a psychiatrist retrospectively using the Diagnostic Instrument for Brain Studies – Revised (DIBS-R). The DIBS is semi-structured instrument designed specifically for postmortem psychiatric assessment using medical records and informants where available. This instrument is compliant with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The DSMIV and DSMV Diagnostic Criteria were used in all psychiatric disorder cases.

2.2. Total RNA isolation from ACC

TRIzol ® (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) was used to isolate RNA. The detail method has been described earlier (Roy et al., 2017a). The RNA purity was checked by Nanodrop (260/280 nm; cutoff ⩾ 1.8) and integrity by agarose gel electrophoresis. It was made sure that RNA Integrity Number (RIN) for all samples were within acceptable range of 7–8.

2.3. Library preparation and sequencing of miRNAs using total RNA from ACC

The isolated total RNA from ACC of all 47 subjects were sequenced using Genomic Core facility at University of Alabama at Birmingham following small RNA library preparation method. In brief, the RNA quality was checked on the Agilent BioAnalyzer for the presence of a strong 5S peak to assure the miRNA fraction. Total RNA was used in an initial ligation reaction to attach 3’ oligo with RNA ligase. A subsequent ligation was performed to add 5’ oligo, also with RNA Ligase. A primer specific for the 3’ oligo was used to generate 1st strand cDNA in a standard reaction. Double stranded cDNA was generated via PCR. The resulting library was checked for size and quality using the DNA High Sensitivity Chip on the Agilent BioAnalzyer. The libraries were quantitated via qPCR (KapaBiosystems), normalized to 3 nM, and loaded onto Illumina NextSeq 500 and sequenced with 75bp single end reads as per the manufacturer’s protocol. The miRNA profiling was conducted using Illumina NGS platform, libraries were created using Qiagen’s miRNA kit. The resulting libraries were standardized for concentration and sequenced on the NextSeq500 using 75 bp single end reads.

2.4. Analysis of miRNA sequencing data

Reads were trimmed, unique molecular identifier (UMI) sequences were identified and were aligned to miRbase and the human hg38 genome. Next, the count reads and UMIs were assigned to each miRNA. The UMIs were then normalized in Qiagen’s GeneGlobe Data Analysis Center (https://geneglobe.qiagen.com/us/analyze/). Based on normalized miRNA expression values across 25 control and 22 MDD subjects, the expression heat map was generated following a hierarchical clustering method. In the expression heat map, the miRNAs with high expression values are shown in green color and miRNAs with low expression values are shown in red (Fig. 1A). For the clustering purpose, the Euclidean method was used to measure the distance, and the average linkage algorithm was applied to calculate the average pairwise distance between all pairs of points. To determine the miRNA expression changes in a biologically meaningful way, fold-change (FC) was calculated using the normalized miRNA expression in each test sample divided by the normalized miRNA expression in the control sample. For the geNorm and Total Molecular Tag Count normalization methods, the p values were calculated based on Student’s t-test of the replicated normalized miRNA expression values for each miRNA in the control group and the MDD group. For the DESeq2 and Trimmed Mean of M (edgeR) normalization methods, the p values were determined by the respective Bioconductor software packages.

Fig. 1: miRNA expression heatmap and differentially expressed miRNAs.

Fig. 1:

A) All 2540 annotated miRNAs and their normalized values between MDD and control (n = 22 vs 25) subjects were plotted in an expression heatmap with hierarchical clustering. Green and red color in the map show higher and lower expression values respectively. For the clustering purposes, the Euclidean method was used to measure the distance, and the average linkage algorithm was applied to calculate the average pairwise distance between all pairs of points. Following the average linkage clustering algorithm, the dendrogram was constructed to demonstrate the expression similarities. B) MDD specific numerical distribution of significantly altered miRNAs was presented with a bar of pie diagram. The pie plot shows the distribution of differentially expressed 171 annotated miRNAs and 59 predicted miRNAs based on their significance level (p<0.05). The 117 up and 54 downregulated miRNAs from the list of 171 annotated miRNAs were plotted with a bar diagram.

2.5. miRNA target gene prediction

GO analysis was done independently based on the predicted targets of miRNAs which were found to be significantly upregulated (FC≥ 2.0) in ACC of MDD subjects. To obtain a consensus list of predicted targets, in-silico prediction algorithm from eight different prediction programs (i.e., miRWalk, Microt4, miRanda, miRDB, Pictar2, PITA, RNA22, and Targetscan under miRWalk version 2.0 software package) was used. Next, a common list of targets that were shared by any five of them were used for further functional prediction analysis.

2.6. Prediction based pathway and GO analysis

The consensus list of predicted targets prepared from miRWalk (version 2.0) software was used to predict gene ontology (GO) terms using the ShinyGO program and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) based pathway analysis using WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt, http://www.webgestalt.org/). The GO prediction analysis was done following an FDR corrected p-value cutoff 0.05 to determine the gene set enrichment in biological process (BP) and cellular component (CC) category separately. In BP, 30 most significant terms were used to plot the network with edge cutoff 0.05, whereas, in the CC, the connected nodes are presented with 40 most significant terms with edge cutoff 0.03. In each category, the enriched terms were used to create networks where nodes are presented with terms and connected with edges. If two nodes are connected, then they share 20% (default) or more genes. Bigger nodes represent larger gene sets. Thicker edges represent more overlapped genes. In WebGestalt, Over-Representation Analysis (ORA) with KEGG pathway was used to find the relevant pathways. Further, the gene list obtained from WebGestalt was filtered based on the parameters defining neurobiological functions associated with neuronal growth and survival. A short list of genes was further fed into Metascape program (http://metascape.org/gp/index.html#/main/step1) which uses 40 independent knowledge bases to integrate system level information and creates comprehensive gene list with designing features including gene annotation, pathway and functional enrichment. For creating the color-coded bar plot, the algorithm first identified all statistically enriched terms (Zhou et al., 2019). Next, accumulative hypergeometric p-values and enrichment factors were calculated and used for filtering them. Remaining significant terms were then hierarchically clustered into a tree based on Kappa-statistical similarities among their gene memberships. The tree was casted into terms using an optimized kappa threshold (0.3).

2.7. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 25.0 software (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normality of the data. The average difference of age, PMI, and brain PH, was assessed by Student’s t test. Differences in miRNA expression based on gender, alcohol abuse, antidepressants, and suicide were analyzed by Student’s t test. Correlation between miRNA expression and age, brain pH, and PMI were evaluated by Pearson Product Moment analysis. Statistical significance was set at the 95% level (p = 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. MDD specific differential miRNA expression profile in ACC

From the differential expression analysis between control and MDD groups, a total of 2540 fully annotated miRNAs regardless of their statistical significance were detected. Using the normalized values of all miRNAs expressed across all 47 subjects, a hierarchically clustered expression heat map was generated (Fig. 1A) to show the differential expression profile between MDD and control subjects. Green and red color in the map show higher and lower expression values respectively. Following the average linkage clustering algorithm, the dendrogram was constructed to demonstrate the expression similarities. These miRNAs included both up and downregulated groups. Besides that, a set of 423 predicted (novel) miRNAs were also found to be altered in the MDD group. However, filtering the list of differentially regulated miRNAs following statistical significance (p≤0.05) resulted in the identification of a total 230 miRNAs including both annotated (171) and predicted (59) ones (Fig. 1B). For annotated miRNAs, 117 (4.61%) were upregulated and 54 (2.13%) were downregulated. From the list of 59 novel miRNAs, 50 miRNAs (11.8%) were found to be upregulated and 9 miRNAs (2.13%) were downregulated. In the significantly altered annotated miRNA group, sorting the list with ≥2 fold change (FC) value identified 24 highly upregulated miRNAs in the MDD group. Two separate tables have been presented to show all significantly (p ≤ 0.05) altered miRNAs (Table 2). Topmost significantly expressed (extremely upregulated, FC cut off >2.0; and downregulated, FC cut off <0.5) miRNAs in the MDD group are highlighted with bold fonts in Table 2.

Table 2.

Significantly altered miRNAs in ACC of MDD group (p≥ 0.05)

miRNA miRBase ACC No. Fold change p-value Chromosomal location
Up-regulated
hsa-miR-6077 MIMAT0023702 2.59 1.9E-05 chr1: 148388282–148388363 [+]
hsa-miR-4632-3p MIMAT0019688 2.69 2.2E-05 chr1: 12191713–12191773 [+]
hsa-miR-6789-3p MIMAT0027479 2.49 0.00017 chr19: 2235829–2235926 [−]
hsa-miR-648 MIMAT0003318 2.41 0.00025 chr22: 17980868–17980961 [−]
hsa-miR-4498 MIMAT0019033 2.83 0.00049 chr12: 120155434–120155499 [−]
hsa-miR-6084 MIMAT0023709 2.22 0.0007 chr1: 20633679–20633788 [+]
hsa-miR-4433a-3p MIMAT0018949 2.15 0.00095 chr2: 64340759–64340839 [+]
hsa-miR-4638-5p MIMAT0019695 2.04 0.00128 chr5: 181222566–181222633 [−]
hsa-miR-4258 MIMAT0016879 2.39 0.00142 chr1: 154975693–154975783 [+]
hsa-miR-6850-5p MIMAT0027600 2.01 0.00168 chr8: 144791931–144791991 [−]
hsa-miR-4510 MIMAT0019047 1.62 0.00171 chr15: 35926856–35926923 [+]
hsa-miR-3651 MIMAT0018071 2.47 0.00173 chr9: 92292458–92292547 [−]
hsa-miR-4497 MIMAT0019032 2.73 0.00243 chr12: 109833348–109833436 [+]
hsa-miR-668-5p MIMAT0026636 2.62 0.00244 chr14: 101055258–101055323 [+]
hsa-miR-6800-3p MIMAT0027501 1.72 0.00291 chr19: 49832018–49832099 [+]
hsa-miR-7108-3p MIMAT0028114 2.81 0.00474 chr19: 2434914–2435000 [−]
hsa-miR-4761-3p MIMAT0019909 2.96 0.00478 chr22: 19963753–19963834 [+]
hsa-miR-4426 MIMAT0018941 2.56 0.00509 chr1: 192716328–192716390 [+]
hsa-miR-4720-3p MIMAT0019834 1.93 0.00573 chr16: 81385018–81385093 [+]
hsa-miR-4281 MIMAT0016907 1.78 0.00656 chr5: 176629439–176629500 [−]
hsa-miR-1273h-3p MIMAT0030416 1.36 0.0066 chr16: 24203116–24203231 [+]
hsa-miR-4736 MIMAT0019862 1.84 0.00694 chr17: 58335976–58336022 [−]
hsa-miR-3155a MIMAT0015029 1.49 0.00736 chr10: 6152196–6152277 [+]
hsa-miR-1227-5p MIMAT0022941 1.81 0.00751 chr19: 2234062–2234149 [−]
hsa-miR-6802-5p MIMAT0027504 1.5 0.00762 chr19: 55239912–55239976 [−]
hsa-miR-572 MIMAT0003237 2.21 0.00776 chr4: 11368827–11368921 [+]
hsa-miR-1470 MIMAT0007348 2.5 0.00876 chr19: 15449548–15449608 [+]
hsa-miR-520f-3p MIMAT0002830 2.11 0.01011 chr19: 53682159–53682245 [+]
hsa-miR-92b-3p MIMAT0003218 1.36 0.01019 chr1: 155195177–155195272 [+]
hsa-miR-5572 MIMAT0022260 1.68 0.01052 chr15: 80581103–80581239 [+]
hsa-miR-4746-3p MIMAT0019881 2.18 0.01059 chr19: 4445978–4446048 [+]
hsa-miR-550b-2-5p MIMAT0022737 1.99 0.01082 chr7: 30289794–30289890 [−]
hsa-miR-518e-5p MIMAT0005450 1.84 0.01137 chr19: 53729838–53729925 [+]
hsa-miR-6781-5p MIMAT0027462 1.66 0.01184 chr17: 42823880–42823943 [−]
hsa-miR-6890-3p MIMAT0027681 1.91 0.01185 chr3: 49099854–49099914 [−]
hsa-miR-760 MIMAT0004957 1.34 0.01196 chr1: 93846832–93846911 [+]
hsa-miR-516a-3p MIMAT0006778 1.75 0.01338 chr19: 53756741–53756830 [+]
hsa-miR-4695-5p MIMAT0019788 1.99 0.01347 chr1: 18883202–18883275 [−]
hsa-miR-501-3p MIMAT0004774 1.34 0.014 chrX: 50009722–50009805 [+]
hsa-miR-1180-5p MIMAT0026735 1.6 0.01427 chr17: 19344506–19344574 [−]
hsa-miR-4728-3p MIMAT0019850 1.86 0.01456 chr17: 39726495–39726561 [+]
hsa-miR-523-5p MIMAT0005449 1.79 0.01576 chr19: 53698385–53698471 [+]
hsa-miR-1193 MIMAT0015049 2.45 0.01676 chr14: 101030052–101030129 [+]
hsa-miR-4318 MIMAT0016869 1.84 0.01778 chr18: 37657135–37657215 [+]
hsa-miR-5580-5p MIMAT0022273 1.82 0.01786 chr14: 53948427–53948484 [−]
hsa-miR-7112-5p MIMAT0028121 1.75 0.01981 chr8: 144262673–144262737 [−]
hsa-miR-6805-3p MIMAT0027511 1.52 0.02005 chr19: 55388181–55388242 [+]
hsa-miR-5587-5p MIMAT0022289 1.46 0.02055 chr16: 535316–535368 [+]
hsa-miR-6851-5p MIMAT0027602 1.61 0.02114 chr9: 33467869–33467935 [−]
hsa-miR-6814-3p MIMAT0027529 1.53 0.02122 chr21: 41746772–41746841 [−]
hsa-miR-4663 MIMAT0019735 1.56 0.02128 chr8: 123215788–123215863 [−]
hsa-miR-6075 MIMAT0023700 2.54 0.02134 chr5: 1510762–1510856 [−]
hsa-miR-1343-3p MIMAT0019776 1.37 0.02178 chr11: 34941837–34941920 [+]
hsa-miR-6737-5p MIMAT0027375 2.61 0.2188 chr1: 153962351–153962420 [−]
hsa-miR-6879-3p MIMAT0027659 1.52 0.0229 chr11: 65018505–65018570 [+]
hsa-miR-4701-3p MIMAT0019799 235 0.02293 chr12: 48771975–48772037 [−]
hsa-miR-92b-5p MIMAT0004792 1.6 0.02334 chr1: 155195177–155195272 [+]
hsa-miR-6753-5p MIMAT0027406 1.7 0.02367 chr11: 68044794–68044957 [+]
hsa-miR-4485-5p MIMAT0032116 1.55 0.02503 chr11: 10508270–10508326 [−]
hsa-miR-6769b-5p MIMAT0027620 1.65 0.02522 chr1: 206474803–206474864 [+]
hsa-miR-519b-3p MIMAT0002837 1.84 0.02561 chr19: 53695213–53695293 [+]
hsa-miR-4430 MIMAT0018945 1.66 0.02604 chr2: 33418516–33418564 [+]
hsa-miR-6511b-5p MIMAT0025847 1.38 0.0264 chr16: 2106669–2106753 [−]
hsa-miR-595 MIMAT0003263 1.72 0.02696 chr7: 158532718–158532813 [−]
 hsa-miR-3591-5p 1.82 0.02726
hsa-miR-6892-5p MIMAT0027684 1.48 0.0278 chr7: 143382686–143382800 [+]
hsa-miR-6769a-5p MIMAT0027438 1.66 0.02784 chr16: 4671318–4671390 [+]
hsa-miR-6815-3p MIMAT0027531 1.51 0.02888 chr21: 45478266–45478326 [+]
hsa-miR-6082 MIMAT0023707 1.6 0.02979 chr4: 171186184–171186292 [+]
hsa-miR-4466 MIMAT0018993 1.8 0.03022 chr6: 156779678–156779731 [−]
hsa-miR-4758-5p MIMAT0019903 1.56 0.0304 chr20: 62332487–62332557 [−]
hsa-miR-622 MIMAT0003291 1.43 0.03112 chr13: 90231182–90231277 [+]
hsa-miR-6851-3p MIMAT0027603 1.6 0.03117 chr9: 33467869–33467935 [−]
hsa-miR-521 MIMAT0002854 1.6 0.03178
hsa-miR-521-1 chr19: 53748636–53748722 [+]
hsa-miR-521-2 chr19: 53716594–53716680 [+]
hsa-miR-636 MIMAT0003306 1.73 0.03187 chr17: 76736450–76736548 [−]
hsa-let-7c-3p MIMAT0026472 1.12 0.03194 chr21: 16539828–16539911 [+]
hsa-miR-6810-3p MIMAT0027521 1.46 0.03235 chr2: 218341911–218341980 [+]
hsa-miR-1247-5p MIMAT0005899 1.58 0.03266 chr14: 101560287–101560422 [−]
hsa-miR-3648 MIMAT0018068 1.77 0.0332
hsa-mir-3648-1 chr21: 8208473–8208652 [+]
hsa-mir-3648-2 chr21: 8986999–8987178 [+]
hsa-miR-484 MIMAT0002174 1.31 0.03341 chr16: 15643294–15643372 [+]
hsa-miR-3621 MIMAT0018002 1.8 0.03348 chr9: 137169186–137169270 [−]
hsa-let-7e-5p MIMAT0000066 1.18 0.03408 chr19: 51692786–51692864 [+]
hsa-miR-519d-3p MIMAT0002853 1.43 0.03453 chr19: 53713347–53713434 [+]
hsa-miR-486-3p MIMAT0004762 1.43 0.03481 chr8: 41660441–41660508 [−]
hsa-miR-3189-3p MIMAT0015071 1.48 0.03544 chr19: 18386562–18386634 [+]
hsa-miR-5189-5p MIMAT0021120 1.69 0.03563 chr16: 88468918–88469031 [+]
hsa-miR-4522 MIMAT0019060 1.44 0.03575 chr17: 27293910–27293996 [−]
hsa-miR-302c-5p MIMAT0000716 1.48 0.03583 chr4: 112648363–112648430 [−]
hsa-miR-328-3p MIMAT0000752 1.44 0.03667 chr16: 67202321–67202395 [−]
hsa-miR-1-5p MIMAT0031892 1.22 0.03697 chr20: 62554306–62554376 [+]
hsa-miR-1234-3p MIMAT0005589 1.39 0.03734 chr8: 144400086–144400165 [−]
hsa-miR-6826-3p MIMAT0027553 1.4 0.03748 chr3: 129272146–129272243 [+]
hsa-miR-378c MIMAT0016847 1.15 0.03837 chr10: 130962588–130962668 [−]
hsa-miR-30d-5p MIMAT0000245 1.11 0.03859 chr8: 134804876–134804945 [−]
hsa-miR-7156-3p MIMAT0028223 1.32 0.03873 chr1: 77060143–77060202 [+]
hsa-miR-519e-5p MIMAT0002828 1.42 0.03896 chr19: 53679940–53680023 [+]
hsa-miR-6869-5p MIMAT0027638 1.57 0.03987 chr20: 1392900–1392961 [−]
hsa-miR-3689f MIMAT0019010 1.74 0.04079 chr9: 134850742–134850807 [−]
hsa-miR-4512 MIMAT0019049 1.55 0.04117 chr15: 66496958–66497034 [−]
hsa-miR-6857-5p MIMAT0027614 1.4 0.04123 chrX: 53405673–53405765 [−]
hsa-miR-6889-3p MIMAT0027679 1.47 0.04153 chr22: 41252992–41253050 [−]
hsa-miR-6131 MIMAT0024615 1.37 0.04303 chr5: 10478037–10478145 [+]
hsa-miR-6510-5p MIMAT0025476 1.53 0.04315 chr17: 41517164–41517217 [−]
hsa-miR-4505 MIMAT0019041 1.66 0.04334 chr14: 73758747–73758819 [+]
hsa-miR-4685-3p MIMAT0019772 1.4 0.04387 chr10: 98431292–98431360 [−]
hsa-miR-4530 MIMAT0019069 1.82 0.04423 chr19: 39409623–39409678 [−]
hsa-miR-6794-5p MIMAT0027488 1.56 0.04427 chr19: 12852260–12852327 [+]
hsa-miR-125b-2-3p MIMAT0004603 1.17 0.04465 chr21: 16590237–16590325 [+]
hsa-miR-4538 MIMAT0019081 1.54 0.04479 chr14: 105858165–105858242 [−]
hsa-miR-663b MIMAT0005867 1.8 0.0453 chr2: 132256966–132257080 [−]
hsa-miR-3609 MIMAT0017986 1.42 0.04669 chr7: 98881650–98881729 [+]
hsa-miR-2861 MIMAT0013802 1.76 0.04701 chr9: 127785918–127786007 [+]
hsa-miR-4783-5p MIMAT0019946 1.4 0.04721 chr2: 127423537–127423618 [−]
hsa-miR-671-3p MIMAT0004819 1.26 0.04791 chr7: 151238421–151238538 [+]
hsa-miR-3928-5p MIMAT0027037 1.19 0.04812 chr22: 31160062–31160119 [−]
hsa-miR-6821-5p MIMAT0027542 1.61 0.04932 chr22: 49962866–49962939 [+]
hsa-miR-6853-3p MIMAT0027607 1.24 0.0499 chr9: 35732922–35732995 [+]
Downregulated
hsa-miR-136-5p MIMAT0000448 0.73 0.00047 chr14: 100884702–100884783 [+]
hsa-miR-551b-3p MIMAT0003233 0.73 0.00117 chr3: 168551854–168551949 [+]
hsa-miR-367-3p MIMAT0000719 0.45 0.00137 chr4: 112647874–112647941 [−]
hsa-miR-5590-5p MIMAT0022299 0.46 0.00221 chr2: 134857820–134857873 [+]
hsa-miR-337-5p MIMAT0004695 0.84 0.00244 chr14: 100874493–100874585 [+]
hsa-miR-1251-5p MIMAT0005903 0.81 0.00248 chr12: 97491909–97491978 [+]
hsa-miR-543 MIMAT0004954 0.83 0.00361 chr14: 101031987–101032064 [+]
hsa-miR-138-5p MIMAT0000430 0.8 0.00399 chr16: 56858518–56858601 [+]
hsa-miR-20b-3p MIMAT0004752 0.47 0.00427 chrX: 134169809–134169877 [−]
hsa-miR-495-5p MIMAT0022924 0.85 0.00475 chr14: 101033755–101033836 [+]
hsa-miR-6808-3p MIMAT0027517 0.62 0.00586 chr1: 1339650–1339708 [−]
hsa-miR-4705 MIMAT0019805 0.88 0.00765 chr13: 102045934–102046004 [−]
hsa-miR-376a-3p MIMAT0000729 0.81 0.00766 chr14: 101040782–101040849 [+]
hsa-miR-4796-3p MIMAT0019971 0.73 0.00775 chr3: 114743445–114743525 [−]
hsa-miR-495-3p MIMAT0002817 0.75 0.01027 chr14: 101033755–101033836 [+]
hsa-miR-154-5p MIMAT0000452 0.84 0.01082 chr14: 101059755–101059838 [+]
hsa-miR-496 MIMAT0002818 0.84 0.01097 chr14: 101060573–101060674 [+]
hsa-miR-548ar-3p MIMAT0022266 0.46 0.01173 chr13: 114244505–114244561 [+]
hsa-miR-670-3p MIMAT0026640 0.75 0.01195 chr11: 43559656–43559753 [+]
hsa-miR-488-3p MIMAT0004763 0.85 0.01201 chr1: 177029363–177029445 [−]
hsa-miR-29b-2-5p MIMAT0004515 0.9 0.01285 chr1: 207802443–207802523 [−]
hsa-miR-497-5p MIMAT0002820 0.86 0.01297 chr17: 7017911–7018022 [−]
hsa-miR-335-5p MIMAT0000765 0.87 0.01304 chr7: 130496111–130496204 [+]
hsa-miR-487a-3p MIMAT0002178 0.82 0.01611 chr14: 101052446–101052525 [+]
hsa-miR-544a MIMAT0003164 0.8 0.01635 chr14: 101048658–101048748 [+]
hsa-miR-342-5p MIMAT0004694 0.89 0.01789 chr14: 100109655–100109753 [+]
hsa-miR-1197 MIMAT0005955 0.82 0.01812 chr14: 101025564–101025651 [+]
hsa-miR-153-5p MIMAT0026480 0.81 0.01966 chr7: 157574336–157574422 [−]
hsa-miR-6844 MIMAT0027589 0.78 0.0209 chr8: 124508515–124508576 [−]
hsa-miR-758-3p MIMAT0003879 0.85 0.02115 chr14: 101026020–101026107 [+]
hsa-miR-22-5p MIMAT0004495 0.87 0.02205 chr17: 1713903–1713987 [−]
hsa-miR-29b-3p MIMAT0000100 0.85 0.02327 chr7: 130877459–130877539 [−]
hsa-miR-377-3p MIMAT0000730 0.83 0.02501 chr14: 101062050–101062118 [+]
hsa-miR-153-3p MIMAT0000439 0.8 0.02614 chr2: 219294111–219294200 [−]
hsa-miR-2277-5p MIMAT0017352 0.9 0.02674 chr5: 93620696–93620788 [−]
hsa-miR-9-3p MIMAT0000442 0.9 0.02713 chr1: 156420341–156420429 [−]
hsa-miR-1307-5p MIMAT0022727 0.83 0.03086 chr10: 103394253–103394401 [−]
hsa-miR-548a-3p MIMAT0003251 0.72 0.03186 chr6: 18571784–18571880 [+]
hsa-miR-494-3p MIMAT0002816 0.9 0.03362 chr14: 101029634–101029714 [+]
hsa-miR-22-3p MIMAT0000077 0.89 0.03656 chr17: 1713903–1713987 [−]
hsa-miR-3689a-5p MIMAT0018117 0.43 0.03897 chr9: 134849487–134849564 [−]
hsa-miR-146a-5p MIMAT0000449 0.9 0.04076 chr5: 160485352–160485450 [+]
hsa-miR-4477b MIMAT0019005 0.81 0.04126 chr9: 41233755–41233835 [−], chr9: 63819574–63819654 [+]
hsa-miR-582-3p MIMAT0004797 0.88 0.04397 chr5: 59703606–59703703 [−]
hsa-miR-7-1-3p MIMAT0004553 0.9 0.04513 chr9: 83969748–83969857 [−]
hsa-miR-376c-3p MIMAT0000720 0.83 0.04613 chr14: 101039690–101039755 [+]
hsa-miR-135b-5p MIMAT0000758 0.85 0.04615 chr1: 205448302–205448398 [−]
hsa-miR-376a-5p MIMAT0003386 0.86 0.04712 chr14: 101040782–101040849 [+]
hsa-miR-128-2-5p MIMAT0031095 0.62 0.04776 chr3: 35744476–35744559 [+]
hsa-miR-376c-5p MIMAT0022861 0.85 0.04836 chr14: 101039690–101039755 [+]
hsa-miR-5582-3p MIMAT0022280 0.63 0.04923 chr11: 46753125–46753192 [−]
hsa-miR-548ac MIMAT0018938 0.53 0.04978 chr1: 116560024–116560111 [−]
hsa-miR-3182 MIMAT0015062 0.7 0.04988 chr16: 83508346–83508408 [+]
hsa-miR-548a-5p MIMAT0004803 0.72 0.04997 chr8: 104484369–104484465 [−]

Bold face letter miRNAs show fold change >2.0 (upregulated) or <0.5 (downregulated)

3.2. Effects of covariates toward extremely upregulated 24 miRNAs (fold change cut off >2.0)

The extremely upregulated 24 miRNAs were used for target prediction and gene ontology. These miRNAs were further evaluated for their association with covariates such as age, gender, brain pH, PMI, alcohol abuse, antidepressant toxicology, and suicide as cause of death. Detailed results are shown in the supplementary section (Table S1). None of the changes in miRNAs were associated with any of the covariates except age was negatively correlated with miR-4701–3p (p=0.043, r=−0.407) and brain pH was positively correlated with miR-6737–5p (p=0.031, r=0.432), miR-6075 (p=0.040, r=0.423), miR-4701–3p (p=0.031, r=0.433) in the control group. Within the MDD group, alcohol abuse had significant impact on the expression of miR-6077 (p=0.012), miR-6789–3p (p=0.034), miR-648 (p=0.027), and mir-4746–3p (p=0.009). There were no significant differences in miRNA expression when MDD subjects who died by suicide were compared with those who died by causes other than suicide (Table S1).

3.3. Target gene prediction

Owing to the repressive nature of miRNAs in regulating target gene expression, top 24 significantly upregulated miRNAs (FC >2.0) were used for target gene prediction analysis following conservative prediction algorithm. As mentioned in methods section, a common list of targets that were shared by any five of the prediction algorithms was finalized. A total of 1092 predicted target genes were finally used for subsequent GO and KEGG based pathway analyses.

3.4. miRNA target gene-based gene ontology and pathway prediction

Following GO enrichment analysis with the predicted targets of significantly upregulated 24 miRNAs in ACC of MDD subjects, we found three separate clustering of GO terms under the BP category (p value cutoff <0.05 [FDR], Edge Cutoff: 0.3) (Fig. 2A). The clustered biological functions were plotted into networks to represent their relatedness. The nodes representing the GO terms are only connected through edges when they share 20% or more genes. The bigger nodes represent larger gene sets. Thicker edges represent more overlapped genes. Gross functional enrichments of genes for nucleic acid and protein metabolisms were identified as shown in the two left most clusters. The right most cluster in the network map demonstrates the presence of four enriched terms; all of which were central to neuronal growth and development (e.g., neurogenesis, nervous system development, neuron differentiation and generation of neurons). Next, another network map was created following the GO term enrichment under CC category (p value cutoff <0.05 [FDR], Edge Cutoff: 0.3) (Fig. 2B). The map showed predominant enrichment of terms correlated with somatic (neuronal cell body), somatodendritic and synaptic (pre, post synaptic, and synaptic vesicle) functions in central nervous system. Additionally, the targeted enrichment of genes was mapped translating to glutamatergic synapses which have earlier been suggested to be important in MDD associated ACC functions.

Fig. 2: Gene ontology and pathway prediction.

Fig. 2:

GO terms for A) biological process and B) cellular component based on predicted 1,092 target genes. The GO prediction analysis was done following an FDR corrected p-value cutoff 0.05 to determine the gene set enrichment in biological process and cellular component category separately by ShinyGO program. Each category the enriched terms were used to create networks where nodes are presented with terms and connected with edges. As shown in the graphs, if two nodes are connected, then they share 20% (default) or more genes. Bigger nodes represent larger gene sets. Thicker edges represent more overlapped genes. C) A pathway-based network map (p value cutoff <0.05 [FDR], Edge Cutoff: 0.2; most significant display terms: 50) was prepared showing the predicted involvement of various neuro-molecular pathways, those are earlier reported to be important in MDD pathogenesis.

A pathway-based network map (p value cutoff <0.05 [FDR], Edge Cutoff: 0.2; most significant display terms: 50) was separately prepared showing the predicted involvement of various neuro-molecular pathways (Fig. 2C) earlier reported to be quite important in MDD pathogenesis. These include ErbB, Wnt, MAPK, mTOR, and phosphatidylinositol signaling. A significant enrichment of pathways related to immuno-inflammatory functions, mostly pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-17 and TNF) and their regulating factors (NF-kappa B signaling) were also noted.

WebGestalt program was additionally used to further validate ShinyGO based findings based on putative targets of 24 significantly upregulated miRNAs. In both the KEGG pathway and GO analysis, top 10 pathways are listed according to significance level as a large number of pathways were hit (KEGG pathway, 271; BP, more than 2,000; CC, 779; molecular functions [MF], 1158) (Table 3 and 4). From the KEGG pathway, long-term potentiation (LTP, hsa04720) had the highest enrichment ratio (3.4). From the BP results, several GO terms were found that were primarily related to the central nervous systems (CNS) such as neuron projection development (GO:0031175), neuron development (GO:0048666), generation of neurons (GO:0048699), neuron differentiation (GO:0030182), and neurogenesis (GO:0022008). From the CC results, CNS related GO terms such as synapse (GO:0045202), synapse part (GO:0044456), neuron part (GO:0097458), and neuron projection (GO:0043005) were found. In terms of MF, RNA polymerase II regulatory region DNA binding (GO:0001012) had the highest enrichment ratio (1.95). A summary of the significantly annotated (FDR corrected) pathways with a focus on neuronal morphogenesis and regulation are presented as a bar diagram showing the enrichment of genes under each term (Fig. 3).

Table 3.

KEGG pathway results from extremely upregulated 24 miRNAs (fold change cut off >2.0)

Gene Set Description Enrichment ratio p-value FDR Candidate genes
hsa04720 Long-term potentiation 3.4039 0.00016382 0.0055154 ADCY1, CALM1, GRIA2, GRIN1, MAPK1, PPP1CB, PRKCA, PRKCB, PRKCG, RAP1A, RPS6KA1, RPS6KA3
hsa05220 Chronic myeloid leukemia 3.2509 0.00014340 0.0055154 CBL, CDKN1B, GAB2, GADD45A, HDAC2, MAPK1, MYC, NFKB1, NFKBIA, PIK3CD, POLK, RELA, SHC4
hsa04550 Signaling pathways regulating pluripotency of stem cells 2.7345 0.000035245 0.0041494 ACVR1B, ACVR2B, BMPR1A, FGFR2, FZD10, FZD3, FZD5, IGF1, IL6ST, KAT6A, MAPK1, MEIS1, MYC, ONECUT1, OTX1, PCGF5, PIK3CD, SMAD9, WNT3A, ZFHX3
hsa04722 Neurotrophin signaling pathway 2.7150 0.00014818 0.0055154 ARHGDIA, CALM1, IRAK2, IRAK4, MAPK1, NFKB1, NFKBIA, NTRK2, NTRK3, PIK3CD, RAN1A, RELA, RPS6KA1, RPS6KA3, RPS6KA5, SHC4, TP73
hsa04360 Axon guidance 2.4978 0.000040804 0.0041494 ARHGEF12, CFL2, CXCL12, DPYSL5, FZD3, GNAI2, MAPK1, NRP1, PAK2, PAK3, PARD6G, PIK3CD, PLXNA1, PLXNC1, PRKCA, RASA1, ROBO2, ROCK1, SEMA3A, SEMA3C, SEMA5A, SRGAP2, SRGAP3
hsa04014 Ras signaling pathway 2.3756 0.000010929 0.0035628 ARF6, CALM1, CSF1, FGF1, FGFR2, GAB2, GNGT2, GRIN1, IGF1, KIT, KSR2, MAPK1, NFKB1, NTRK2, PAK2, PAK3, PIK3CD, PRKCA, PRKCB, PRKCG, RAB5B, RAP1A, RASAL2, RASGRF2, RELA, SHC4, STK4, TEK
hsa05202 Transcriptional misregulation in cancer 2.3501 0.00010641 0.0055154 AFF1, CDKN1B, FOXO1, GADD45A, H3F3B, HDAC2, HMGA2, IGF1, IL2RB, KLF3, MEF2C, MEIS1, MMP3, MPO, MYC
hsa04144 Endocytosis 2.1030 0.00018487 0.0055154 AGAP1, ARF6, ARFGEF1, CAPZA1, CBL, CHMP4C, CHMP7, CYTH4, FGFR2, IL2RB, IQSEC2, KIF5C, NEDD4, PARD6G, PIP5K1C, PML, PRKCI, RAB10, RAB11FIP4, RAB31, RAB35, RAB5B, RABEP1, SH3GLB1, SMURF1, SNX12, STAM2
hsa04010 MAPK signaling pathway 1.9971 0.00016207 0.0055154 CACNA1E, CACNB4, CSF1, DUSP16, FGF1, FGFR2, CADD45A, IGF1, IRAK4, KIT, MAPK1, MEF2C, MKNK2, MYC, NFKB1, NLK, NTRK2, PAK2, PRKCA, PRKCB, PRKCG, RAP1A, RASA1, RASGRF2, RELA, RPS6KA1, RPS6KA3, RPS6KA5, STK4, TAOK1, TEK
hsa05200 Pathways in cancer 1.7704 0.000050912 0.0041494 ADCY1, ADCY2, ARHGEF12, ARNT, CALM1, CBL, CCDC6, CDKN1B, COL4A2, CXCL12, DLL4, EDNRB, ESR1, FGF1, FGFR2, FOXO1, FZD10, FZD3, FZD5, GADD45Am GNAI2, GNGT2, HDAC2, HEY2, IGF1, IL2RB, IL6ST, ITGA2, KIT, LAMC3, MAPK1, MYC, NFKB1, NFKBIA, NOTCH2, PIK3CD, PML, POLK, PRKCA, PRLCB, PRKCG, RELA, ROCK1, RPS6KA5, SP1, STK4, TPM3, TRAF4, WNT3A

Table 4.

Gene ontology results from extremely upregulated 24 miRNAs (fold change cut off >2.0)

Gene Set Description Enrichment ratio p-value FDR
Biological Processes (BP)
GO:0007156 Homophilic cell adhesion via plasma 3.2174 1.1770e-8 0.000035666
GO:0098742 Cell-cell adhesion via plasma-membrane 2.5358 1.1691e-7 0.00017713
GO:0030099 Myeloid cell differentiation 2.1868 4.9157e-7 0.00044689
GO:0031175 Neuron projection development 1.7059 4.3918e-7 0.00044689
GO:0048666 Neuron development 1.6533 4.7477e-7 0.00044689
GO:0048699 Generation of neurons 1.6481 3.8315e-9 0.000034832
GO:0030182 Neuron differentiation 1.6467 2.6161e-8 0.000047566
GO:0045944 Positive regulation of transcription by RNA 1.6351 2.6580e-7 0.00034519
GO:0022008 Neurogenesis 1.6031 1.0945e-8 0.000035666
GO:0006468 Protein phosphorylation 1.5305 1.9251e-8 0.000043753
Cellular Components (CC)
GO:0045202 Synapse 2.2821 0 0
GO:0044456 Synapse part 2.1256 3.8531e- 8.6364e-9
GO:0030054 Cell junction 1.8931 1.8015e- 3.0239e-8
GO:0097458 Neuron part 1.8893 1.0347e- 6.0790e-11
GO:0043005 Neuron projection 1.8638 4.3436e- 6.3796e-8
GO:0098805 Whole membrane 1.8445 3.5398e- 1.3864e-9
GO:0005887 Integral component of plasma membrane 1.8253 1.6646e- 4.8899e-9
GO:0031226 Intrinsic component of plasma membrane 1.7831 4.4101e- 8.6364e-9
GO:0044463 Cell projection part 1.7663 3.2440e-9 3.8118e-7
GO:0120038 Plasma membrane bounded cell projection 1.7663 3.2440e-9 3.8118e-7
Molecular Functions (MF)
GO:0001012 RNA polymerase II regulatory region 1.9494 2.4542e- 0.0000094567
GO:0000977 RNA polymerase II regulatory region 1.9123 8.2815e- 0.000022206
GO:0016773 Phosphotransferase activity, alcohol 1.9041 3.4398e- 0.000010761
GO:0044212 Transcription regulatory region DNA 1.8801 7.5765e- 0.0000068572
GO:0001067 Regulatory region nucleic acid binding 1.8759 8.4200e- 0.0000068572
GO:0000976 Transcription regulatory region sequence- 1.8594 1.3786e- 0.000028751
GO:1990837 Sequence-specific double-stranded DNA 1.8351 1.3181e- 0.000028751
GO:0003690 Double-stranded DNA binding 1.7775 1.6863e- 0.000031653
GO:0000981 DNA-binding transcription factor activity, 1.6004 2.5191e- 0.0000094567
GO:0003700 RNA -binding transcription factor activity 1.5945 1.0960e- 0.0000068572

Fig. 3: Significantly annotated top 10 biological pathway.

Fig. 3:

GO terms for biological process was predicted by WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt, http://www.webgestalt.org/). The significantly annotated (FDR corrected) pathways with a focus on neuronal morphogenesis and regulation are presented as a bar diagram showing the enrichment of genes under each term.

Next, in order to create an integrated visualization network to determine involvement of neuronal morphogenesis, growth and survival factors, a select list of 55 genes from WebGestalt analysis were used in the Metascape program. The enrichment visualization network resulted from the analysis was quite interesting and for the first time show intra- and inter-cluster similarities of enriched terms based on overrepresented gene list. As presented in Fig. 4A, the network was mapped with 20 enriched terms connected by two major domains and three smaller subdoamins. In particular, the terms associated with two major domains in the network were critically enriched (based on calculation using accumulative hypergeometric p-values and enrichment factors) for their roles in regulating phosphatidyl signaling, GTPase signaling, neuron migration and NTRK based neurotrophin signaling. The network is colored by cluster ID, where nodes that share the same cluster IDs are typically close to each other. In Fig. 4B, the same enrichment network has its nodes colored by p-value. The darker the color, the more statistically significant the node is (see legend for p-value ranges). The network result is also presented in a color-coded bar plot in Fig. 4C. Each bar in the plot shows enriched terms across input gene lists, and color coded with respective p-values.

Fig. 4: The enrichment visualization network based on overrepresented gene list.

Fig. 4:

A) The network was mapped with 20 enriched terms connected by two major domains and three smaller sub-domains. B) Representation of same enrichment network with colored coded (nodes) p-value. The darker the color, the more statistically significant the node is (see legend for p-value ranges) and C) the same enrichment terms presented listed up as a color-coded bar plot.

4. Discussion

This is the first study to examine transcriptome-wide miRNA expression changes in ACC of MDD subjects using next-generation miRNA sequencing. Based on sequencing results, we detected 2540 annotated miRNAs and 423 novel miRNAs. Of those, 230 miRNAs were significantly altered in MDD subjects compared to control subjects. When directionality of expression was considered, we found that 117 miRNAs (4.61%) were significantly upregulated and 54 (2.13%) were downregulated in MDD subjects (n=22) compared with non-psychiatric controls (n=25). Our web centric parameters and ontology enrichment functions (based on predicted target genes) identified two major domains related to phosphatidyl signaling, GTPase signaling, neuronal migration, and neurotrophin signaling.

In a previous qPCR-based study of 29 miRNAs, Azevedo et al (2016) found decreased expression of miR-34a and miR-184e in ACC of MDD subjects, however, these changes could not survived multiple correction testing (Azevedo et al., 2016). Owing to the repressive nature of miRNAs in regulating target gene expression, we selected top 24 significantly upregulated miRNAs (>2 fold) in ACC of MDD subjects for their possible role in MDD pathogenesis. Our prediction based results helped in finding many target genes that are important in glutamatergic system (GRIN1 and GRIA2) and neurotrophin signaling (NTRK2 and NTRK3) as well neuronal morphogenesis. The upregulated 24 miRNAs that were used in the prediction analysis were relatively new and their functions have not been extensively characterized. Nevertheless, we conducted gene set enrichment analysis to determine relevant neurobiological functions on the basis of stringent statistical parameters. Intra- and inter-cluster similarities of enriched terms based on overrepresented gene list showed neurobiological functions associated with neuronal growth and survival.

The network enrichment map based on ShinyGO results showed predominance of ontological terms that were correlated with somatic (neuronal cell body), somatodendritic, and presynaptic, postsynaptic, and synaptic vesicle functions. Additionally, we mapped the targeted enrichment of genes translating to glutamatergic synapse which has earlier been shown to play important role in ACC functions associated with MDD pathogenesis. Other reports have previously suggested the role of specific biological factors and their dysregulation in complex behavioral manifestations including MDD and MDD associated suicidal behavior (Pandey, 2013). Several of them have been tested for their prognostic values in predicting complex suicidal behavior (e.g., suicide attempts); however, only a handful of them have proved to be reliable in clinical practices. For instance, the levels of prolactin and thyroid hormone have been found to be associated with suicide attempts in psychiatric patients (Pompili et al., 2012). Moreover, showing the predicted involvement of various other neuro-molecular pathways such as ErbB, Wnt, MAPK, mTOR, and phosphatidylinositol signaling made these findings much more relevant. These pathways have been suggested to play critical roles in maintaining neuronal health and activity under normal conditions but are significantly modified in MDD. We also identified significant enrichment of pathways related to immunomodulatory functions, primarily underlying pro-inflammatory functions mediated through cytokines such as interleukin-17 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and their regulatory factors NF-kappa B (NF-kB). This is the first report showing miRNA-mediated regulation of pro-inflammatory genes/pathways in ACC of MDD subjects. This is in line with a previous report showing similar inflammatory activation in ACC by peripheral cytokines where inflammation-associated mood deterioration was significantly correlated with enhanced activity of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sACC) (Harrison et al., 2009). NF-kB signaling pathway (NFKB1) is important in MDD pathogenesis from neurotrophin point of view. It has been suggested that the p75NTR, a proBDNF receptor, activates the NF-kB signaling pathway, which results in the alterations of transcription of multiple genes involved to promote neuronal death such as toll-like receptors (TLRs) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (Napetschnig and Wu, 2013; Sugiyama et al., 2016). It appears that there is an integrated tripartite relationship between miRNAs, inflammation and neurotrophic activity, which might hold the possibility for deprivation of neuronal growth and functioning in ACC under MDD pathogenesis.

Our results from WebGestalt analysis suggested functional deficits associated with LTP, neurotrophin signaling, and axon guidance. It has earlier been suggested that the postsynaptic form of LTP in the ACC synapse depends on the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), a type of glutamate receptor (Li et al., 2017; Zhao et al., 2005). In addition, decreased levels of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) made by glutamate with glutamate decarboxylase (GAD), has also been reported in the ACC of MDD subjects (Price et al., 2009; Schur et al., 2016). Altogether, this shows that in ACC, the LTP modulation in MDD subjects could be associated with upregulation in certain miRNAs via NMDA receptor dysregulation. On the other, axon guidance is known as a key determinant in the formation of neuronal networks. As mentioned above, miRNA-based prediction results found several target genes that play key roles in axon and dendrite formation (Cariboni et al., 2011; Cobos et al., 2007; Dickson and Gilestro, 2006; Erskine et al., 2011; Mastick et al., 2010). Therefore, our miRNA findings may highlight that MDD associated morphometric deficits in ACC could be due to altered dendritic formation and their connecting networks.

As mentioned in results section, using Metascape program, we prepared enrichment visualization networks. The outcomes were very interesting and showed for the first time intra- and inter-cluster similarities of enriched terms based on overrepresented gene list defining neurobiological functions that either were associated with neuronal growth or survival. With the help of web centric parameters and ontology enrichment functions (based on calculation using accumulative hypergeometric p-values and enrichment factors), we were able to identify two major domains in the network. Interestingly, they built the most cohesive part of the network enrichment with terms associated with phosphatidylinositol signaling, GTPase signaling, neuron migration and most importantly NTRK (receptor for BDNF) based neurotrophin signaling. These results reconfirmed our findings from other two web centric prediction analysis programs (ShinyGo and WebGestalt). This is highly encouraging given that the Metascape analysis is based on 40 independent knowledgebase to integrate system level information and creating a comprehensive gene list. Moreover, the enrichment scores for creating the networks were infringed with rigorous statistical clustering.

Altogether our results identified significant changes in miRNA expression in ACC of MDD subjects. Functional annotation from all three prediction programs consistently highlighted the role miRNAs central to neuronal growth, morphogenesis and differentiation. Precisely, the neuronal atrophy and reduction in volume of ACC, which is hallmark of MDD pathology (Koolschijn et al., 2009), could be considered as potential loss of gene function due to the changes in miRNA landscape. Our comparison with MDD suicide and non-suicide groups suggest that these miRNAs were not specifically associated with suicide as has been reported earlier in dlPFC, where some miRNAs were explicitly related to suicidal behavior (Wang et al., 2018). Interestingly, miRNAs that were altered in ACC of MDD subjects, did not overlap with miRNAs that were dysregulated in other brain areas such as dlPFC (Smalheiser et al., 2012) and locus coeruleus (Roy et al., 2017b). This suggests that specific miRNAs may be regulating gene network(s) or functions that could be critical in ACC functioning and relevant to MDD pathogenesis. In the future, gene expression studies need to be performed to examine precise miRNA functioning in ACC of MDD subjects.

From gene regulation perspective, miRNA acts as repressor of target gene expression, thus large scale miRNA expression profiling can inform systems-level changes in gene regulation. Measurement of the relative abundance of a cohort of miRNAs, ranging from a few significantly altered miRNAs to a group of several miRNAs closely adhered to a specific neurobiological pathway (e.g., phosphatidyl signaling, GTPase signaling and neurotrophin signaling) could help underpinning the causal association. This may help strengthen strategize precision treatment towards a set of targets.

Supplementary Material

1

Highlights.

  • Expression levels of miRNAs were determined in anterior cingulate cortex of MDD subjects by miRNA-seq.

  • A significant number of miRNAs were differentially regulated in MDD subjects.

  • Predicted target-based gene ontology suggested that altered miRNAs may be related to abnormalities in neuronal functions, atrophy and volume loss in ACC of MDD subjects.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01MH082802; R01MH101890; R01MH100616; R01MH107183-01; R01MH118884) and American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (SRG-1-042-14) to Dr. Y. Dwivedi.

Role of funding source

Funding agencies had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute On Alcohol Abuse And Alcoholism of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R28AA012725. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health

Footnotes

Declaration of Competing Interest

Authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Azevedo JA, et al. , 2016. The microRNA network is altered in anterior cingulate cortex of patients with unipolar and bipolar depression. J Psychiatr Res 82, 58–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackburn TP, 2019. Depressive disorders: Treatment failures and poor prognosis over the last 50 years. Pharmacol Res Perspect 7, e00472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Briggs JA, et al. , 2015. Mechanisms of Long Non-coding RNAs in Mammalian Nervous System Development, Plasticity, Disease, and Evolution. Neuron 88, 861–877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bush G, et al. , 2000. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 4, 215–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cariboni A, et al. , 2011. VEGF signalling controls GnRH neuron survival via NRP1 independently of KDR and blood vessels. Development 138, 3723–3733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cobos I, et al. , 2007. Dlx transcription factors promote migration through repression of axon and dendrite growth. Neuron 54, 873–888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cotter D, et al. , 2002. The density and spatial distribution of GABAergic neurons, labelled using calcium binding proteins, in the anterior cingulate cortex in major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 51, 377–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dedova I, et al. , 2009. The importance of brain banks for molecular neuropathological research: The New South Wales Tissue Resource Centre experience. Int J Mol Sci 10, 366–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dickson BJ, Gilestro GF, 2006. Regulation of commissural axon pathfinding by slit and its Robo receptors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 22, 651–675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Drevets WC, et al. , 2008. The subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in mood disorders. CNS spectrums 13, 663–681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Erskine L, et al. , 2011. VEGF signaling through neuropilin 1 guides commissural axon crossing at the optic chiasm. Neuron 70, 951–965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gabbay V, et al. , 2012. Anterior cingulate cortex gamma-aminobutyric acid in depressed adolescents: relationship to anhedonia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 69, 139–149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Harrison NA, et al. , 2009. Inflammation causes mood changes through alterations in subgenual cingulate activity and mesolimbic connectivity. Biol Psychiatry 66, 407–414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harrison PJ, et al. , 1995. The relative importance of premortem acidosis and postmortem interval for human brain gene expression studies: selective mRNA vulnerability and comparison with their encoded proteins. Neurosci Lett 200, 151–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kocerha J, et al. , 2015. Noncoding RNAs and neurobehavioral mechanisms in psychiatric disease. Mol Psychiatry 20, 677–684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Koolschijn PC, et al. , 2009. Brain volume abnormalities in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 30, 3719–3735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li XH, et al. , 2017. Characterization of postsynaptic calcium signals in the pyramidal neurons of anterior cingulate cortex. Mol Pain 13, 1744806917719847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lim GY, et al. , 2018. Prevalence of Depression in the Community from 30 Countries between 1994 and 2014. Sci Rep 8, 2861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Malki K, et al. , 2015. Identification of genes and gene pathways associated with major depressive disorder by integrative brain analysis of rat and human prefrontal cortex transcriptomes. Transl Psychiatry 5, e519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mastick GS, et al. , 2010. Longitudinal axons are guided by Slit/Robo signals from the floor plate. Cell Adh Migr 4, 337–341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Napetschnig J, Wu H, 2013. Molecular basis of NF-kappaB signaling. Annu Rev Biophys 42, 443–468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pandey GN, 2013. Biological basis of suicide and suicidal behavior. Bipolar Disord 15, 524–541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pizzagalli D, et al. , 2001. Anterior cingulate activity as a predictor of degree of treatment response in major depression: evidence from brain electrical tomography analysis. Am J Psychiatry 158, 405–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pompili M, et al. , 2012. Prolactin and thyroid hormone levels are associated with suicide attempts in psychiatric patients. Psychiatry Res. 200, 389–394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pompili M, et al. , 2013. Bereavement after the suicide of a significant other. Indian J. Psychiatry 55, 256–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Price RB, et al. , 2009. Amino acid neurotransmitters assessed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: relationship to treatment resistance in major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 65, 792–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Qureshi IA, Mehler MF, 2013. Long non-coding RNAs: novel targets for nervous system disease diagnosis and therapy. Neurotherapeutics 10, 632–646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Radley JJ, et al. , 2008. Repeated stress alters dendritic spine morphology in the rat medial prefrontal cortex. J Comp Neurol 507, 1141–1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Roy B, et al. , 2017a. Identification of MicroRNA-124–3p as a Putative Epigenetic Signature of Major Depressive Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 42, 864–875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Roy B, et al. , 2017b. Altered miRNA expression network in locus coeruleus of depressed suicide subjects. Sci Rep 7, 4387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Salta E, De Strooper B, 2012. Non-coding RNAs with essential roles in neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet Neurol 11, 189–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sartor GC, et al. , 2012. The Emerging Role of Non-Coding RNAs in Drug Addiction. Front Genet 3, 106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schmaal L, et al. , 2017. Cortical abnormalities in adults and adolescents with major depression based on brain scans from 20 cohorts worldwide in the ENIGMA Major Depressive Disorder Working Group. Mol Psychiatry 22, 900–909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schur RR, et al. , 2016. Brain GABA levels across psychiatric disorders: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of (1) H-MRS studies. Hum Brain Mapp 37, 3337–3352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sheedy D, et al. , 2008. An Australian Brain Bank: a critical investment with a high return! Cell Tissue Bank 9, 205–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Smalheiser NR, et al. , 2012. MicroRNA expression is down-regulated and reorganized in prefrontal cortex of depressed suicide subjects. PLoS One 7, e33201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Stevens FL, et al. , 2011. Anterior cingulate cortex: unique role in cognition and emotion. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 23, 121–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sugiyama K., et al. , 2016. NF-kappaB activation via MyD88-dependent Toll-like receptor signaling is inhibited by trichothecene mycotoxin deoxynivalenol. J Toxicol Sci 41, 273–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang Q, et al. , 2018. Role of Complex Epigenetic Switching in Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Upregulation in the Prefrontal Cortex of Suicide Subjects. Am J Psychiatry 175, 262–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wellman CL, 2001. Dendritic reorganization in pyramidal neurons in medial prefrontal cortex after chronic corticosterone administration. J Neurobiol 49, 245–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wise T, et al. , 2017. Common and distinct patterns of grey-matter volume alteration in major depression and bipolar disorder: evidence from voxel-based meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 22, 1455–1463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu H, et al. , 2016. Changed Hub and Corresponding Functional Connectivity of Subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Major Depressive Disorder. Front Neuroanat 10, 120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhao MG, et al. , 2005. Roles of NMDA NR2B subtype receptor in prefrontal long-term potentiation and contextual fear memory. Neuron 47, 859–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhou Y, et al. , 2019. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat Commun 10, 1523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES