Abstract
A multivalent recombinant fusion protein prophylactic vaccine, rBmHAXT developed against lymphatic filariasis (LF) demonstrated over 57% protection against challenge infection in rhesus macaque model. Currently, we do not know if the rBmHAXT vaccination has any effect on adult worms and/or on the fecundity of adult female worms. Thus, the major focus of this study was to determine the effect of rBmHAXT vaccination on Brugia malayi infected mongolian gerbils. We performed two sets of experiments. In the first set of experiment, gerbils were infected with 100 B. malayi L3. After confirming the establishment of infection, four rounds of DEC treatment and rBmHAXT vaccination was given. Results showed that following vaccination with rBmHAXT, the microfilaria (Mf) count was significantly decreased in all vaccinated animals compared to controls. At the end of these experiments, we collected and counted the established adult worms. There was a 36% reduction in the recovery of adult female worms, which might account for the low Mf load in vaccinated animals. In the second set of experiments, animals were vaccinated first with rBmHAXT followed by surgically implanting adult male or female B. malayi parasites into the peritoneal cavity to determine the effect of vaccination on each sex of the parasite. Our results show that the rBmHAXT vaccination has no effect on male adult worms compared to controls. However, there was 40% reduction in the Mf load in vaccinated animals that were transplanted with adult female worms. These findings suggested that the rBmHAXT vaccination has potential damaging effect on the fecundity of adult female worms. Scanning electron microscopy studies showed cuticular damage on the surface of adult female worms. These studies thus show that the rBmHAXT vaccination in infected gerbils has partial microfilaricidal effect and potentially affect the fecundity of adult female worms.
Keywords: Lymphatic filariasis, Brugia malayi, Multivalent vaccine, Filarial adult worm
1. Introduction
Lymphatic filariasis (LF) caused by Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi, and B. timori parasites is a neglected chronic tropical parasitic infection transmitted by mosquitoes. The disease is endemic in about 52 countries, with about 120 million people suffering from chronic LF infection and another 856 million people at risk of acquiring the infection (WHO, 2018). Currently, mass drug administration (MDA) is the major strategy adopted by the World Health Organization (WHO) to prevent disease transmission and to treat actively infected subjects with the filarial infections (Brady, 2014; Ramaiah and Ottesen, 2014). MDA program has been instrumental in the substantially limiting LF infection in several endemic regions in addition to reducing the intensity of soil transmitted helminth infections (Gyapong et al. 2018; Bockarie and Deb 2010). However, there are several limitations to the MDA program including lack of effectiveness of the drugs used in the MDA against established chronic infections and against the adult worms (Critchley et al., 2005; Sangshetti JN, 2017). There are reports of subject non-compliance to MDA that is potentially leading to the reemergence of LF infection in several parts of the world (Krentel et al., 2013; Nujum et al., 2012). There are also significant issues with the distribution of the MDA drugs in some of the endemic areas of the world that has also potentially contributed to the overall slow progress of the MDA in certain regions, especially since the MDA treatment needs to be repeated annually (Krentel et al., 2013; Nujum et al., 2012; Sunish et al., 2013). Vaccination-based control strategy has been highly successful in preventing several infectious diseases (F. E. Andre, 2008). However, there is no prophylactic vaccine available to date to control LF. Several pioneering work over the last 50 years on the immunology of human filarial infections clearly suggests that vaccine-based control is possible against human LF infections (Ottesen 1984; King and Nutman 1991; Ravindran et al. 2008; Sahu et al. 2008; Morris et al. 2012; Rajamanickam and Babu 2013; Babu and Nutman 2014). Several laboratories including our laboratory are currently working towards developing a prophylactic vaccine for LF and have identified several potential vaccine targets (Anugraha et al., 2015; Hartmann et al., 2014; Kalyanasundaram, 2018). In our laboratory, we identified and evaluated the vaccine potential of several vaccine candidates and demonstrated that a multivalent fusion protein vaccine gave better protection than monovalent or bivalent antigens (Chauhan et al., 2017; Dakshinamoorthy et al., 2013; Dakshinamoorthy et al., 2012; Joseph et al., 2012). A tetravalent formulation, recombinant B. malayi HAXT (rBmHAXT), containing; heat shock protein 12.6 (HSP) (Dakshinamoorthy et al. 2012), abundant larval transcript-2 (ALT-2) (Gregory et al. 2000), thioredoxin peroxidase-2 (TPX-2) (Gnanasekar et al., 2004), and tetraspanin large extracellular loop (TSP) (Gnanasekar et al 2008), was found to be a better vaccine formulation (Chauhan et al., 2018; Khatri et al., 2018) than a vaccine formulation with three antigens (rBmHAT) (Chauhan et al., 2017; Dakshinamoorthy et al., 2014). Comparison of various adjuvant formulations demonstrated that alum combined with glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant-stable emulsion (GLA-SE), a TLR4 agonist is a better adjuvant formulation for rBmHAXT (Chauhan 2018, Dakshinamoorthy 2013b). Thus, vaccination trials with rBmHAXT along with alum combined with GLA-SE gave over 88% protection in rodent models (Chauhan et al., 2018) and over 57% protection in rhesus macaque model (Khatri et al., 2018).
Acutely infected subjects rarely show any clinical symptoms (Babu and Nutman, 2014). However, chronically infected individuals show the classic lymph edema and other physical deformities, which helps in the diagnosis of the disease (Chakraborty et al., 2013). Therefore, in a mass vaccination program it will be difficult to selectively identify the acutely infected individuals, unless a mass screening for infection is performed before the vaccination campaign. Thus, when vaccinating infected individuals, a vaccine that has some detrimental effect on the adult worms or that possesses anti-fecundity effect will be significantly advantageous in a mass vaccination campaign. Those with active filarial infection actively contribute in disease transmission. If this vaccine can decrease the fecundity of adult female worms, it can aid in restricting the disease transmission. Effect of DEC on circulating Mf is transient, whereas the anti-fecundity effect of vaccine can stay for longer period. Currently, we do not know if rBmHAXT vaccination has any effect on the adult filarial worms. However, based on previous studies the vaccine antigens are expressed on the surface of larval and adult parasites, which suggest that this may have some effect on the adult filarial worms (Gnanasekar et al., 2004; Maizels et al., 2001). Therefore, the major focus of this study was to evaluate the vaccine potential of rBmHAXT against adult B. malayi worms in a Meriones unguiculatus (Mongolian gerbil) model.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Experimental animals, parasites and adjuvant
The use of animals in this study was approved by the IACUC committee of the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Rockford. Four-week old male Mongolian Gerbils (M. unguiculatus) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). B. malayi male and female adult worms and infective third stage larvae (L3) were obtained from the NIAID/NIH Filariasis Research Reagent Resource Center (University of Georgia, Athens, GA) under NIAID supply contract AI#30022. The TLR4 agonist, GLA-SE combined with alum (AL019) adjuvant was purchased from the Infectious Disease Research Institute (IDRI, Seattle, WA).
2.2. Preparation of recombinant protein
rBmHAXT was cloned and expressed as described previously (Khatri et al., 2018). Endotoxin was removed using an endotoxin removal column (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL). Endotoxin levels in the final purified preparations was < 0.3 EU/mg of protein.
2.3. Effect of rBmHAXT on established B. malayi worm infection in gerbils
2.3.1. Establishing B. malayi infection in gerbils
To evaluate the effect of rBmHAXT vaccination on established adult worm infection, twenty-five gerbils were challenged intraperitoneally with 50 B. malayi L3s. All the larvae were examined microscopically for viability and only the viable larvae were used for challenge. Three months after challenge, one ml of sterile saline was injected into the peritoneal cavity of gerbils. After gentle massage, about 500 μl of peritoneal fluid was retrieved from each animal using a 21-gauge needle and the microfilariae (Mf) load in the peritoneal fluid was determined under a light microscope.
2.3.2. Experimental groups and treatment strategy
Out of 50 gerbils challenged with B. malayi L3, 17 gerbils became positive for B. malayi microfilariae and were randomly divided into three groups, Group 1 (n=6 gerbils) was treated with AL019 adjuvant alone (AL019 group), Group 2 (n=6 gerbils) received diethylcarbamazine (DEC) plus AL019 adjuvant (DEC plus AL019 group) and finally Group 3 (n=5 gerbils) received DEC plus rBmHAXT vaccine (DEC plus rBmHAXT group). Prior to each dose of vaccine, gerbils were treated three times i.p. with 6mg/kg of diethylcarbamazine (DEC) for three consecutive days (Fig. 1). This will mimic the MDA approach. The peritoneal fluid of each gerbil was checked the day following DEC treatment to determine the Mf load. After confirming that the Mf load has decreased substantially following DEC treatment in all infected gerbils, Group 3 animals were immunized four times at 2 weeks interval with 15 μg of rBmHAXT plus 10 μg of AL019 adjuvant after DEC treatment. Gerbils in Group 2 received 10 μg of AL019 only after DEC treatment and remained as controls for the vaccination. Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital space of all animals before each immunization, two weeks after the last immunization and prior to euthanasia to determine the titer of IgG antibodies.
Figure 1.
Schematic diagram of the experimental groups with time-line showing the DEC treatment and vaccination schedule used in the study.
2.3.3. Monitoring the status of infection
Peritoneal cavity of gerbil was tapped at several time points before and after DEC treatment and immunizations to determine the Mf load. One month after the last does of immunization, gerbils were euthanized, and peritoneal cavity was checked thoroughly to collect all the adult worms. Recovered, male and female adult worms were separated based on their morphology and counted to evaluate the number of adult worms established.
2.4. Effect of rBmHAXT vaccination on surgically transplanted filarial adult worms
2.4.1. Experimental groups and immunization protocol
This study was carried out to evaluate the effect of rBmHAXT vaccination on adult male or female worms. For this experiment, eight gerbils were immunized four times with 15 μg of rBmHAXT plus 10 μg of AL019 adjuvant at 2 weeks interval. Control group of gerbils (n=5) received AL019 only. Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital space prior to each immunization, two weeks after the last immunization and prior to euthanasia to determine the titer of IgG antibodies.
After confirming that all the vaccinated gerbils have developed significant titers of IgG antibodies, the eight rBmHAXT immunized gerbils were divided into 2 groups (Group 1 and Group 2; n=4 each). Similarly, the five control gerbils (AL019 group) were also divided into 2 groups (Group 3; n=3 and Group 4; n=2). Five live male B. malayi adult worms were surgically implanted into the peritoneal cavity of each animal in Group 1 and Group 3 and five live female B. malayi adult worms were surgically implanted into the peritoneal cavity of each animal in Group 2 and Group 4.
2.4.2. Surgical implantation of live adult worms into the peritoneum of gerbil
Fresh live male and female worms were obtained from University of Gerogia, NIAID/NIH Filariasis Research Reagent Resource Center. The worms were first washed with RPMI media and their viability were checked. Fecundity of female worms were determined under a microscope for the release of Mf in vitro. Damaged or sluggish worms were removed and only intact and highly active adults were used for the surgical implantation.
Briefly, after anesthetizing the animals with a combination of ketamine (50 mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg) intramuscularly, the abdominal skin was shaved, and scrubbed with betadine. Approximately 10 mm incision was made on the skin, abdominal muscle and peritoneal membrane. The worms were then carefully inserted into the peritoneal cavity of each gerbil and the incision on abdominal muscle and skin was closed separately with 1–3 sutures and with liquid silicone sheet (Scar Guard Repair Liquid, Scarguard Labs, NY) respectively. Animals were monitored for 48h post-surgery to assess their complete recovery.
2.4.3. Monitoring the status of surgically implanted adult worms in vaccinated animals
One month after placing the worms into the peritoneal cavity, animals were tapped and the Mf load in the peritoneal fluid was determined. All animals were euthanized on day 30 after the infection and the implanted adult worms were recovered and observed for damage or death (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.
Schematic diagram showing the protocol used for immunization and surgical transplantation of adult male and adult female worms.
2.5. Scanning electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy of adult worms recovered from the peritoneal cavity of gerbils was performed to determine any damage to the surface of the adult worms. Briefly, adult worms recovered from the peritoneal cavity were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution (Sigma–Aldrich) for 3 h. After incubation, worms were rinsed three times with PBS, and then fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (Sigma–Aldrich) for 1h. Worms were washed again and dehydrated in an ethanol series (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100%) twice for 15 min each. Samples were then air dried overnight and mounted on aluminum stubs, sputter-coated with gold and observed under scanning electron microscope (SEM; EPIC SEM Hitachi SU8030) for any changes in the cuticle.
2.6. Levels of Total IgG and IgG isotypes in the sera of experimental animals
Levels of anti-rBmHAXT IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM and IgA antibodies were determined in the sera of each animal using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with cross-reacting mouse monoclonal isotype antibody reagents purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO) as described previously (Chauhan et al., 2018). Currently there are no antibody reagents available for gerbils.
2.7. Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay
The ADCC assay was performed as described previously (Dakshinamoorthy et al., 2014). Approximately 200 live B. malayi Mf were incubated at 37ºC with 5% CO2 in duplicate wells together with 2×105 peritoneal cells from normal control gerbils and 50 μl of test sera sample. After 72 h incubation, viability of the B. malayi Mf was determined. The percentage of Mf death was expressed as the ratio of the number of dead Mf to the total number recovered from each well multiplied by 100.
2.8. Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism version 7.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) was used to plot all the graphs and statistical analysis of the data was carried out in SPSS v 26.0 (IBM corporation, Armonk, NY) analyze the data. Data was analyzed for normality assumptions using Shapiro-Wilk Test. The data with significance value >0.05 was normally distributed data. Followed by analysis using suitable parametric or non-parametric statistical test. A probability (p) value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Visualization images were prepared using Biorender.com.
3. Results
3.1. Immunization with rBmHAXT reduces Mf load in B. malayi challenged gerbils
In the first set of experiments, we challenged 50 gerbils intraperitoneally with B. malayi L3. When we examined the peritoneal fluid 90 days after infection, 17 of the gerbils showed the presence of Mf in their peritoneal fluid. The Mf load ranged from 30,000 to 34,000 Mf per ml of peritoneal fluid (Table 1). We then gave three doses of DEC to the 12 animals that were positive for the Mf. Analysis of the peritoneal fluid confirmed that the Mf count substantially dropped after the first three doses of DEC treatment compared to the AL019 controls (Fig. 3). At this point (on day 94), we gave the first dose of the rBmHAXT vaccine to one group of infected gerbils. When we checked the peritoneal fluid on day 109, Mf load started showing an increase in the peritoneal cavity of all the animals including all DEC treated animals, suggesting that the effect of DEC is only transient. However, the Mf load was substantially low in the peritoneal cavity of vaccinated animals. Another three doses of DEC were given on day 109 and when checked the Mf load returned to near zero on day 113 in all DEC treated animals compared to AL019 controls. At this point, we gave the second dose of the vaccine. On day 128 we checked the Mf count again the count was high in DEC treated control animals compared to the vaccinated animals. We then gave the third dose of DEC on day 128. As expected, the Mf count was near zero on day 131 in all DEC treated animals compared to AL019 controls. On day 132, we gave the third dose of the vaccination. When checked again for Mf on day 147, the DEC treated control animals had very high levels of Mf in their peritoneal fluids, whereas, the Mf load was low in vaccinated animals. Last dose of DEC was given on day 147 and when checked as expected the Mf load was near zero on day 150 in all animals that were given DEC. The last immunization dose was given on day 151. On day 166, all animals were sacrificed to count the worm establishment. Before collecting the worms, we determined the peritoneal Mf count in each animal. Our results show that the Mf count in AL019 control and DEC treated control were very high and was nearly the same. However, the Mf count in vaccinated animals were low, although the differences were not significant (p=0.09; Fig. 3; Table 1).
Table 1.
Effect of rBmHAXT vaccination on B. malayi infected animals
| Microfilariae (Mf) load prior to each immunization (per ml peritoneal fluid) | Adult worms recovered | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
| Groups | Animal No. | 0 | DEC-1 | 1 | DEC-2 | 2 | DEC-3 | 3 | DEC-4 | 4 | Female | Male |
| AL019 | 1 | 7000 | 7600 | 23000 | 1500 | 14000 | ||||||
| 2 | 65000 | 100000 | 72100 | 41000 | 95500 | 1 | ||||||
| 3 | 15000 | 3800 | 2800 | 100 | 5000 | |||||||
| 4 | 44000 | 27500 | 37900 | 4000 | 28000 | 1 | ||||||
| 5 | 32000 | 18000 | 29700 | 20000 | 35000 | |||||||
| Mean Mf | 32600 ± | 31380 ± | 33100 ± | 13320 ± | 35500 ± | Total | ||||||
| load ± S.D. | 24620 | 37548 | 26414 | 16492 | 34925 | |||||||
| 2 | ||||||||||||
| DEC + AL019 | 1 | 7000 | 0 | 1000 | 0 | 500 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 800 | ||
| 2 | 43000 | 0 | 35000 | 120 | 12600 | 0 | 135000 | 120 | 89000 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3 | 50000 | 100 | 20800 | 0 | 12500 | 0 | 9000 | 0 | 32300 | |||
| 4 | 15000 | 0 | 2400 | 0 | 7900 | 0 | 2000 | 0 | 2300 | 1 | ||
| 5 | 28000 | 0 | 12000 | 0 | 15000 | 0 | 18000 | 0 | 62000 | |||
| 6 | 37500 | 80 | 19000 | 0 | 0 | Animal | 2 | 2 | ||||
| died | ||||||||||||
| Mean Mf | 30083 ± | 30 ± 46.9 | 15033 ± | 20 ± 48.9 | 9700 | 0 ± 0 | 32820 ± | 20 ± 48.9 | 37280 ± | Total | ||
| load ± S.D. | 16632 | 12754 | ± 5749 | 57550 | 38292 | |||||||
| 4 | 3 | |||||||||||
| DEC + rBmHAXT | 1 | 32000 | 0 | 6000 | 0 | 6600 | 0 | 2500 | 0 | 3200 | ||
| 2 | 24000 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 4200 | 0 | 7500 | 0 | 5000 | |||
| 3 | 19000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 4 | 39000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Animal died | |||||
| 5 | 41000 | 0 | 11000 | 0 | 5800 | 0 | 35000 | 0 | 13500 | 1 | 1 | |
| 6 | 52000 | 50 | 18000 | 0 | 7800 | 0 | 13000 | 0 | 3700 | |||
| Mean Mf | 34500 ± | 8.3 ± 20.4 | 5866 | 0 ± 0 | 4066 | 0 ± 0 | 11600 ± | 0 ± 0 | 5080 ± | Total | ||
| load ± S.D. | 12045 | ± 7409 | ± 3360 | 13997 | 5053 | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Fig. 3. Effect of rBmHAXT-vaccination on the peritoneal microfilariae (Mf) counts of gerbils.
The Mf load in the peritoneum of each gerbil was checked by tapping after each DEC cycle and before every immunization cycle. Each data point indicates the Mf count per ml of peritoneal fluid. n=5 gerbils for AL019 group and n=6 for DEC+AL019 and DEC+rBmHAXT groups.
Thus, our results show that after four rounds of rBmHAXT immunization, there was a progressive decrease in the Mf load in rBmHAXT-vaccinated animals (Table 1). Mf load in vaccinated animals was 5080 (± 5053) per ml of peritoneal fluid after the last dose of rBmHAXT (p = 0.131) compared to mean Mf counts of 34500 (± 12045) per ml of peritoneal fluid prior to the start of immunization (Table 1). However, the Mf load in DEC plus AL019 treated gerbils was 37,280 (± 38,292) per ml of peritoneal fluid even after the four rounds of DEC treatments, which was higher than DEC plus rBmHAXT treated animals (Table 1). There was no significant difference in the Mf load between the DEC plus AL019 group and the AL019 control group (35,500 ± 34,925) (Table 1).
All the vaccinated animals developed significantly (p = 0.001) high titer of rBmHAXT specific IgG antibodies (Fig. 4A). To determine the pattern of antibody responses, we measured the levels of antigen specific IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM, and IgA antibodies in the sera of vaccinated and control gerbils (AL019 and DEC+AL019 groups). All the isotype of antibodies that we evaluated were significantly (p<0.001) increased in the rBmHAXT vaccinated animals compared to the control animals (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4. Titer of antigen-specific IgG antibodies in the sera of gerbils.
B. malayi infected gerbils were immunized (s/c) with four doses (15 μg each dose) of rBmHAXT in Al019 as adjuvant after treating three times (i.p.) with DEC (6mg/kg). Blood samples were collected and the levels of rBmHAXT-specific (A) IgG antibodies and (B) IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgA, and IgM antibody isotypes were analyzed in all the groups of animals using ELISA. Each data bar indicates the mean absorbance value for each group ± S.D. n=5 gerbils for AL019 group and n=6 for DEC+AL019 and DEC+rBmHAXT groups. *p ≤ 0.05 when compared to AL019 group as analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test except for the levels of IgM antibodies analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Bonferroni correction for multiple analysis.
3.2. Immunization with rBmHAXT affects the fecundity of B. malayi female adult worms
In the first set of experiments, there was significant reduction in the Mf load. Therefore, we designed a second set of experiment to determine if the rBmHAXT vaccination has any effect on the male worms or female worms separately. In these experiments, we first vaccinated the gerbils and once they developed sufficient titters of antibodies, we surgically implanted live adult male or female B. malayi worms into the peritoneal cavity.
Our results show that all the rBmHAXT-vaccinated animals developed significantly (p = 0.0001) high titers of rBmHAXT-specific IgG antibodies (Fig. 5). The levels of isotypes specific antibodies were also significantly (p<0.0001) high in the rBmHAXT-vaccinated animals compared to the AL019 control animals (Fig. 5). One month after placing the adult female B. malayi worms in the peritoneal cavity, we collected the peritoneal fluid to determine the presence of Mf and to determine the Mf load in each animal. Our results show that in control animals, the Mf load was 6500 (±2262) per ml of peritoneal fluid (Table 1). However, the Mf recovery from rBmHAXT vaccinated animals was low 2550 (±1894) (p = 0.1). On day 30 after surgical implantation, all animals were euthanized, and the implanted worms were collected and observed under light microscope to determine their viability. There were no significant differences in the recovery of adult male worms between the two groups (Table 1). However, there was about 36% decrease (p ≤ 0.06) in the recovery of female worms from the vaccinated group of animals compared to the controls (Table 1). Since our recovery was not 100%, we were not sure if this decrease in the recovery of male and female worms was an effect of the vaccination or not. When we calculated the average number of Mf per adult female worm recovered from the peritoneal cavity of each group of animals, we found that in control animals, there was 1962 Mf per adult female worm recovered. However, in rBmHAXT-vaccinated animals, there was only 1075 Mf per adult worm recovered. This suggested that the female worms in vaccinated animals released only fewer Mf.
Fig. 5. Titer of antigen-specific IgG antibodies in the sera of vaccinated gerbils.
Gerbils were immunized (s/c) with four doses (15 μg each dose) of rBmHAXT in Al019 as adjuvant. Blood samples were collected and the levels of rBmHAXT-specific IgG antibodies and IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgA, and IgM antibody isotypes were analyzed in all the groups of animals using ELISA. Each data bar indicates the mean absorbance value for each group ± S.D. n=8 gerbils for rBmHAXT+AL019 groups and n=5 for AL019 group. *p ≤ 0.0001 when compared to AL019 group as analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test.
The reduction in the number of Mf may be due to fewer Mf released from the female worms or due to a microfilaricidal effect by the protective antibodies in the sera of vaccinated animals. To test the later, we performed an ADCC assay using sera from rBmHAXT vaccinated animals. Our results using the ADCC assay showed that the sera samples from vaccinated animals efficiently killed significant numbers of B. malayi Mf in vitro (64.7% ± 4.8) compared to the sera from AL019 control animals (20% ± 0.1; Fig. 6A). The Mf recovered from the wells supplemented with sera from vaccinated animals had several cells attached on their surface (Fig. 6B, supplementary video).
Fig. 6. Antibody-dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay.
Approximately 200 B. malayi Mf were incubated for 72 h at 37ºC with 0.2 million peritoneal cells and 50 μl of sera samples from each animal. Mf death in each well was monitored under a light microscope. (A) Each bar represents the percent microfilaricidal activity using the sera from respective group (Mean ± S.D values). (B) Representative images of Mf recovered from respective wells at 100x magnification. n=4 sera samples. *p ≤ 0.005 when compared to AL019 group as analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test.
Although the vaccine appeared to have no lethal effect on the adult parasites, we wanted to find out if the effector cells and molecules generated following the vaccination have damaged the cuticle of the parasite. We performed a scanning electron microscopy analysis on the parasites (Fig. 7). Our results show that worms recovered from control animals had smooth cuticular surface and there were no cells found attached to the cuticle. However, on the worms recovered from the vaccinated animals, we found several cells (mainly macrophages and lymphocytes) attached to the cuticle and there was clear damage to the cuticular surface (Fig. 7). We also found significant mucus like materials adhered to the surface of the worms (more specifically the female worms) and this appeared to trap the parasites and prevent their normal movements.
Fig. 7. Scanning electron microscopy of recovered adult worms from experimental animals.
Worms recovered from the peritoneum of experimental animals were processed for SEM and images were scanned to identify damage to the worm surface. (A) Worm recovered from the control group showed no visible damage to the outer surface and there were no cells attached to the worm surface. (B-D) Worms recovered from the rBmHAXT plus AL019 vaccinated group showing cuticular damage at several places (white arrows) and cells attached on the surface of worms (black arrows). We also observed mucus-like material attached to the surface of the worms (black stars).
4. Discussion
This is the first study evaluating the effect of rBmHAXT vaccination on male and female adult worms of B. malayi in a gerbil model. The rationale for evaluating the effect of the vaccine against adults is based on the findings that the vaccine antigens are expressed on the surface of larval and adult parasites (Gnanasekar et al., 2004; Maizels et al., 2001). Therefore, we hypothesized that the vaccine-induced immunity will be effective against microfilariae and the adult parasite as well.
Patients who are acutely infected with LF do not show any clinical symptoms of the disease (Babu and Nutman, 2014). Therefore, during a prophylactic vaccination campaign it will be difficult to diagnose and isolate acutely infected patients from the pool of subject for vaccination. At this time, we do not know if vaccination with rBmHAXT have any effect on the already established parasites in acutely infected individuals. Therefore, in this study we evaluated if vaccination with rBmHAXT in infected gerbils has any effect on the adult worms and/or the microfilariae. Our results show that, the rBmHAXT vaccination has some microfilaricidal and anti-fecundity effect on the female adult worms.
The canonical host immune responses to lymphatic filariasis is a strong Th2 type response with diminished Th1 response to the antigens (Babu and Nutman, 2014). The microfilariae are notorious for their ability to impair immune responses in the infected individuals (Babu et al., 2007; Semnani et al., 2003). The immunosuppressive effect induced by the LF parasite also results in poor immune responses to vaccination, and allergens in the infected individuals (Labeaud et al., 2009). DEC treatment reversed this immunosuppressive state in the humans (Piessens et al., 1981). Therefore, one of the main reasons for treating the infected gerbils with DEC was to remove the microfilariae and allow the gerbils to be immunocompetent so they can respond to the vaccination. One of our preliminary studies showed that the infected animals do not develop sufficient antibodies following vaccination with rBmHAXT (data not shown). Therefore, we decided to give the DEC treatment before immunization. A second reason for the treatment of infected gerbils with DEC was to mimic the MDA protocol before vaccination. Our results show that all animals were positive for Mf before DEC treatment. Following each dose of DEC treatment, the Mf count significantly decreased to nearly zero Mf in all animals. However, within two weeks after stopping the DEC treatment, all the animals in the AL019 plus DEC group showed high levels of Mf in theor peritoneal cavity suggesting that the DEC treatment does not clear the adult worms. This was confirmed at the completion of the study where we recovered seven adult worms (4 females and 3 males) in the DEC + AL019 group. The findings also show that even four doses of DEC treatment was ineffective in preventing the appearance of Mf, especially when the drug effect is gone. Following DEC treatment, we gave four rounds of rBmHAXT immunization. All the vaccinated animals in both the sets of studies developed high titer of rBmHAXT-specific IgG antibodies. The levels and type of antibody response was similar to our previous reports in mice (Chauhan et al., 2017) and in macaques (Khatri et al., 2018), where a balanced Th1 and Th2 response was elicited by the vaccine. These findings suggested that the vaccine was still immunogenic in the infected gerbils. There was an inverse correlation between the titer of anti-rBmHAXT antibodies and the Mf load. As the titer of antibodies increased, the Mf load decreased in the vaccinated animals. However, the Mf load showed a steady increase in the DEC + AL019 control group. These findings suggested that vaccination with rBmHAXT, potentially reduced the number of microfilariae in vaccinated animals.
This decrease in Mf load can be due to two potential reasons; one, it can be a direct effect of the vaccination on the female adult worms affecting their fecundity and viability resulting in reduced number of Mf produced by the female worms. The second possibility might be that the vaccination has potential direct effect on the Mf. DEC is known to decrease the Mf load (Ramzy et al., 2002), but has no significant effect on the fecundity of adult female worms (Fernando et al., 2011; Meyrowitsch et al., 2004; Sunish et al., 2002). Our results confirm these earlier reports in that even four rounds of DEC administration had no significant effect on the fecundity of adult female worms. Therefore, the decreased Mf load observed in the vaccinated animals could be attributed to the reduced fecundity of the female worms following the vaccination. Another possibility is a direct effect of the vaccination on microfilariae.
To test this, we performed an ADCC assay using sera from vaccinated animals. Our results confirmed that the protective antibodies developed in vaccinated animals could kill significant numbers of Mf. Our group and others previously reported that the antigens that are used in the construction of the rBmHAXT vaccine are expressed on the surface of all larval stages including microfilaria. Thus, the findings in this study confirm that rBmHAXT vaccination has partial microfilaricidal activity and may be important in transmission blocking. The Mf count in vaccinated animals was consistently lower at all the time points that we tested. To determine if this was due to adult worms dying in vaccinated animals, we euthanized all the animals on day 15 after the last dose of immunization and recovered the worms from the peritoneal cavity. Our recovery of adult worms from infected animals were not very efficient. In some cases, we found Mf in the peritoneal cavity but could not recover female or male worms. Therefore, we could not confirm if the poor recovery of Mf in vaccinated animals were due to the vaccine effect or due to the poor recovery of female worms. Nevertheless, our data suggest that the vaccination has some effect on the adult worms. To further confirm this, we surgically implanted adult male and female worms separately into the peritoneal cavity of animals vaccinated with rBmHAXT. We chose to conduct these studies with single sex infections to separate out the effect of vaccination on male and female worms. Our results on the surgical transplant studies showed that the rBmHAXT vaccination might have some effect on the adult female worms including potential anti-fecundity effect. When we calculated the mean Mf load per female adult worm recovered, we found that there was about 45% reduction in the Mf load per female worm in the vaccinated animals. Thus, the female worms in vaccinated animals appeared to release fewer Mf.
Currently rBmHAXT is one of the leading prophylactic vaccines for LF (Kalyanasundaram, 2018) that has successfully undergone preclinical trials in rodents and macaque and demonstrated significant protection against challenge infections (Chauhan et al., 2018; Khatri et al., 2018). Although the current study did not prove that the rBmHAXT vaccine has therapeutic effect, there appears to be some anti-fecundity effect on female adult worms. Our results also showed that the vaccination has anti-microfilaricidal effect. Thus, in conclusion, findings in this study suggest that vaccination with rBmHAXT could generate protective antibodies in subjects who already carry the lymphatic filariasis infection.
Supplementary Material
Video showing the cells attached to Mf from the wells supplemented with sera from rBmHAXT-vaccinated animals in ADCC assay.
Highlights
rBmHAXT-vaccination has partial macrofilaricidal effects on adult female worms.
The fecundity of adult female worms was affected following rBmHAXT vaccination.
Vaccination with rBmHAXT has microfilaricidal effects in infected jirds.
Balanced Th1/Th2 immune response were generated in rBmHAXT-vaccinated animals.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grants AI116441 (RK).
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. Use of animal in this study was approved by the Animal Care Committee of the University of Illinois, Rockford. The study followed the National Institutes of Health guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Footnotes
Declaration of competing interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- Anugraha G, Madhumathi J, Prince PR, Prita PJ, Khatri VK, Amdare NP, Reddy MV, Kaliraj P, 2015. Chimeric Epitope Vaccine from Multistage Antigens for Lymphatic Filariasis. Scand J Immunol 82, 380–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Babu S, Blauvelt CP, Nutman TB, 2007. Filarial parasites induce NK cell activation, type 1 and type 2 cytokine secretion, and subsequent apoptotic cell death. J Immunol 179, 2445–2456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Babu S, Nutman TB, 2014. Immunology of lymphatic filariasis. Parasite Immunol 36, 338–346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brady M, 2014. Seventh meeting of the Global Alliance to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis: reaching the vision by scaling up, scaling down, and reaching out. Parasit Vectors 7, 46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty S, Gurusamy M, Zawieja DC, Muthuchamy M, 2013. Lymphatic filariasis: perspectives on lymphatic remodeling and contractile dysfunction in filarial disease pathogenesis. Microcirculation 20, 349–364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chauhan N, Banerjee P, Khatri VK, Canciamille A, Gilles J, Kalyanasundaram R, 2017. Improving the efficacy of a prophylactic vaccine formulation against lymphatic filariasis. Parasitol Res 116, 2821–2830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chauhan N, Khatri V, Banerjee P, Kalyanasundaram R, 2018. Evaluating the Vaccine Potential of a Tetravalent Fusion Protein (rBmHAXT) Vaccine Antigen Against Lymphatic Filariasis in a Mouse Model. Front Immunol 9, 1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Critchley J, Addiss D, Gamble C, Garner P, Gelband H, Ejere H, International Filariasis Review G, 2005. Albendazole for lymphatic filariasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD003753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dakshinamoorthy G, Munirathinam G, Stoicescu K, Reddy MV, Kalyanasundaram R, 2013. Large extracellular loop of tetraspanin as a potential vaccine candidate for filariasis. PLoS One 8, e77394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dakshinamoorthy G, Samykutty AK, Munirathinam G, Shinde GB, Nutman T, Reddy MV, Kalyanasundaram R, 2012. Biochemical characterization and evaluation of a Brugia malayi small heat shock protein as a vaccine against lymphatic filariasis. PLoS One 7, e34077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dakshinamoorthy G, von Gegerfelt A, Andersen H, Lewis M, Kalyanasundaram R, 2014. Evaluation of a multivalent vaccine against lymphatic filariasis in rhesus macaque model. PLoS One 9, e112982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andre FE, R.B., Bock HL, Clemens J, Datta SK, John TJ, Lee BW, Lolekha S, Peltola H, Ruff TA, Santosham Mathuram, Schmitt HJ, 2008. Vaccination greatly reduces disease, disability, death and inequity worldwide. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86, 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernando SD, Rodrigo C, Rajapakse S, 2011. Current evidence on the use of antifilarial agents in the management of bancroftian filariasis. J Trop Med 2011, 175941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gnanasekar M, Rao KV, He YX, Mishra PK, Nutman TB, Kaliraj P, Ramaswamy K, 2004. Novel phage display-based subtractive screening to identify vaccine candidates of Brugia malayi. Infect Immun 72, 4707–4715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartmann W, Singh N, Rathaur S, Brenz Y, Liebau E, Fleischer B, Breloer M, 2014. Immunization with Brugia malayi Hsp70 protects mice against Litomosoides sigmodontis challenge infection. Parasite Immunol 36, 141–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joseph SK, Sambanthamoorthy S, Dakshinamoorthy G, Munirathinam G, Ramaswamy K, 2012. Protective immune responses to biolistic DNA vaccination of Brugia malayi abundant larval transcript-2. Vaccine 30, 6477–6482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalyanasundaram R, 2018. Lymphatic Filariasis: Current Status of Elimination Using Chemotherapy and the Need for a Vaccine, in: Saxena AK (Ed.), Communicable Diseases of the Developing World. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 97–124. [Google Scholar]
- Khatri V, Chauhan N, Vishnoi K, von Gegerfelt A, Gittens C, Kalyanasundaram R, 2018. Prospects of developing a prophylactic vaccine against human lymphatic filariasis - evaluation of protection in non-human primates. Int J Parasitol 48, 773–783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krentel A, Fischer PU, Weil GJ, 2013. A review of factors that influence individual compliance with mass drug administration for elimination of lymphatic filariasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7, e2447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Labeaud AD, Malhotra I, King MJ, King CL, King CH, 2009. Do antenatal parasite infections devalue childhood vaccination? PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3, e442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maizels RM, Gomez-Escobar N, Gregory WF, Murray J, Zang X, 2001. Immune evasion genes from filarial nematodes. Int J Parasitol 31, 889–898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyrowitsch DW, Simonsen PE, Magesa SM, 2004. Long-term effect of three different strategies for mass diethylcarbamazine administration in bancroftian filariasis: follow-up at 10 years after treatment. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 98, 627–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nujum ZT, Remadevi S, Nirmala C, Rajmohanan K, Indu P, Nair SM, 2012. Factors determining noncompliance to mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination. Trop Parasitol 2, 109–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piessens WF, Ratiwayanto S, Piessens PW, Tuti S, McGreevy PB, Darwis F, Palmieri JR, Koiman I, Dennis DT, 1981. Effect of treatment with diethylcarbamazine on immune responses to filarial antigens in patients infected with Brugia malayi. Acta Trop 38, 227–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramaiah KD, Ottesen EA, 2014. Progress and impact of 13 years of the global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis on reducing the burden of filarial disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8, e3319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramzy RM, el-Setouhy M, Helmy H, Kandil AM, Ahmed ES, Farid HA, Faris R, Weil GJ, 2002. The impact of single-dose diethylcarbamazine treatment of bancroftian filariasis in a low-endemicity setting in Egypt. Am J Trop Med Hyg 67, 196–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sangshetti JN SD, Kulkarni A, Arote R, 2017. Two decades of antifilarial drug discovery: a review. . RSC Advances 7, 20628–20666. [Google Scholar]
- Semnani RT, Liu AY, Sabzevari H, Kubofcik J, Zhou J, Gilden JK, Nutman TB, 2003. Brugia malayi microfilariae induce cell death in human dendritic cells, inhibit their ability to make IL-12 and IL-10, and reduce their capacity to activate CD4+ T cells. J Immunol 171, 1950–1960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sunish IP, Rajendran R, Mani TR, Munirathinam A, Tewari SC, Hiriyan J, Gajanana A, Satyanarayana K, 2002. Resurgence in filarial transmission after withdrawal of mass drug administration and the relationship between antigenaemia and microfilaraemia--a longitudinal study. Trop Med Int Health 7, 59–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sunish IP, Shriram AN, Sivan A, Kartick C, Saha BP, Vijayachari P, 2013. Lymphatic filariasis elimination programme in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India: drug coverage and compliance post eight rounds of MDA. Trop Doct 43, 30–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WHO, 2018. Lymphatic Filariasis. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Video showing the cells attached to Mf from the wells supplemented with sera from rBmHAXT-vaccinated animals in ADCC assay.







