Abstract
A polyphasic study was undertaken to establish the position of a Streptomyces strain, isolate PRKS01-65T, recovered from sand dune soil collected at Parangkusumo, Yogyakarta Province, Java, Indonesia. A combination of chemotaxonomic, cultural and morphological properties confirmed its position in the genus of Streptomyces . Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses showed that the isolate was most closely related to Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii C34T (99.9 % similarity) and loosely associated with the type strains of Streptomyces chiangmaiensis (98.7 % similarity) and Streptomyces glomeratus (98.9 % similarity). Multilocus sequence analyses based on five conserved housekeeping gene alleles confirmed the close relationship between the isolate and S. leeuwenhoekii C34T, although both strains belonged to a well-supported clade that encompassed the type strains of S. glomeratus , Streptomyces griseomycini , Streptomyces griseostramineus , Streptomyces labedae , Streptomyces lomondensis and Streptomyces spinoverrucosus . A comparison of the draft genome sequence generated for the isolate with corresponding whole genome sequences of its closest phylogenomic neighbours showed that it formed a well-separated lineage with S. leeuwenhoekii C34T. These strains can also be distinguished using a combination of phenotypic properties and by average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization similarities of 94.3 and 56 %, values consistent with their classification in different species. Based on this wealth of data it is proposed that isolate PRKS01-65T (=NCIMB 15211T=CCMM B1302T=ICEBB-03T) be classified as Streptomyces harenosi sp. nov. The genome of the isolate contains several biosynthetic gene clusters with the potential to produce new natural products.
Keywords: Streptomyces harenosisp. nov, arid sandy soil, polyphasic taxonomy, genomics
Introduction
The emended family Streptomycetaceae [1, 2] includes the genus Streptomyces [1], the type genus [1] and five other genera. The genus Streptomyces encompasses over 800 species with validly published names (www.bacterio.net.streptomyces.html) most of which have been assigned to multi- and single-membered phyletic lines in Streptomyces 16S rRNA gene trees [3, 4]. Genera belonging to the family Streptomycetaceae can be distinguished using a combination of genomic, genotypic and phenotypic features [3, 4].
Streptomycetes are best known as a source of new antibiotics, anti-cancer and other specialized (secondary) metabolites [5, 6], hence the continued interest in them as a source of novel drugs needed in the fight against multi-drug resistant microbial pathogens [7, 8]. Previously unknown Streptomyces strains isolated from deep-sea sediments and desert soils, using taxonomic approaches to drug discovery [9, 10], are a rich source of new bioactive compounds [11, 12]. A case in point was the discovery of new natural products with anti-cancer and anti-microbial properties from Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii strains isolated from hyper-arid Atacama Desert soil [10, 13–16]. The type strain of this species, isolate C34T, is especially gifted sensu Baltz [17] as it has a large genome (7.8 Mb) that includes 31 biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) that mainly encode for unknown specialized metabolites [18]. Such gifted Streptomyces strains are pivotal in the search for new drug-leads using state-of-the-art technologies such as genome mining and metabolic engineering [19, 20].
The aim of the present study was to establish the taxonomic status of a Streptomyces strain, isolate PRKS01-65T, recovered from an arid Indonesian sandy soil sample and found to be closely related to the type strain of S. leeuwenhoekii . These strains were the subject of a polyphasic study underpinned by genomic data derived from whole genome sequences. The resultant datasets confirmed that the isolate and the S. leeuwenhoekii strain are closely related but belong to different species. Consequently, the isolate is considered to represent a new species of Streptomyces for which the name Streptomyces harenosi sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain, PRKS01-65T (=NCIMB 15211T=CCMM B1302T=ICEBB-03T), is a potential source of new natural products.
Isolation, maintenance and cultivation
Isolate PRKS01-65T was recovered from an arid, non-saline soil sample (pH 5.8, organic matter content 0.06 %) collected just below the surface of a sand dune in the Parangkusumo region (8° 1’ 7.513″ S, 110° 19′ 11.04″ E) of Yogyakarta Province, Java, Indonesia by Ali Budhi Kusuma and his students in January 2013 (Fig. S1, available in the online version of this article). One gram of the soil sample was heated at 120 °C for 15 min, sprinkled directly over plates of actinomycete isolation agar (HiMedia), pH 7.3, that were incubated at 45 °C for up to 14 days [21]. Spores taken from a colony of isolate PRKS01-65T growing on one of the isolation plates were used to inoculate yeast extract–malt extract agar [International Streptomyces Project (ISP) medium 2 [22]] plates., which were incubated at 28 °C for 7–14 days. Working cultures of the isolate and S. leeuwenhoekii C34T [14] were maintained on ISP2 agar plates for long-term preservation the strains were kept as mixtures of hyphal fragments and spores in 20 %, v/v glycerol at −20 °C and −80 °C. Biomass for the chemotaxonomic analyses conducted on the isolate was harvested from ISP2 broth cultures which had been shaken at 180 r.p.m. in baffled flasks for 14 days at 28 °C following inoculation with 25 ml seed culture of the isolate prepared under the same conditions. The harvested biomass was washed twice in sterile distilled water and freeze-dried.
Chemotaxonomic, cultural and morphological properties
Isolate PRKS01-65T was examined for chemotaxonomic, cultural and morphological properties known to be of value in Streptomyces systematics [4, 23]. Isomers of diaminopimelic acid (A2pm) were sought as described by Staneck and Roberts [24], whole-organism sugars after Lechevalier and Lechevalier [25], and isoprenoid quinones and polar lipid profiles following the integrated procedure of Minnikin and his colleagues [26]. Fatty acids extracted from the isolate, cultivated under the same conditions as in an earlier study on S. leeuwenhoekii C34T [14], were methylated and analysed using the Sherlock Microbial Identification (midi) system and the resultant peaks identified using the actino6 database [27]. Gram-stain and micromorphological properties were recorded following growth on ISP2 agar for 7 days at 28 °C. Growth taken from the ISP2 agar plate was examined for spore-chain arrangement and spore- surface ornamentation using a scanning electron microscope (Tescan Vega 3, LMU instrument) following the procedure described by O’Donnell et al. [28]. Cultural properties of the isolate were recorded from tryptone–yeast extract, yeast extract–malt extract, oatmeal, inorganic salts–starch, glycerol–asparagine, peptone–yeast extract–iron and tyrosine agar plates (ISP media 1–7) [22] after 21 days at 28 °C. Aerial and substrate mycelial colours and those of diffusible pigments were determined by comparisons against colour charts [29].
The chemotaxonomic, cultural and morphological properties of the isolate were consistent with its classification in the genus Streptomyces [30]. The organism was Gram-stain-positive, formed circular colonies bearing a grey aerial spore mass (Fig. S2a) and an extensively branched substrate mycelium carrying aerial hyphae that differentiated into spiral chains of smooth surfaced spores (Fig. S2b). Whole-organism hydrolysates of the strain were rich in ll-A2pm (Fig. S3), galactose and ribose with lesser proportions of glucose and mannose (Fig. S4). The major isoprenologs were hexa- and octa-hydrogenated menaquinones (34 and 66 %, respectively) and the polar lipids included diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine (diagnostic component), phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylinositol mannosides (Fig. S5). The major fatty acids were in very good agreement with those found in S. leeuwenhoekii C34T [14], apart from differences in minor components, as exemplified by the absence of iso-C10 : 0, C14 : 0 and C17 : 0 in the profile of isolate PRKS01-65T (Table 1).
Table 1.
Cellular fatty acids (%) of isolate PRKS01-65T and Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii C34T
–, Not detected; Data for the S. leeuwenhoekii strain was taken from Busarakam et al. [14].
|
Fatty acid |
Isolate PRKS01-65T |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Branched | ||
|
antesio-C15 : 0 |
22.9 |
29.2 |
|
antesio-C17 : 0 |
10.2 |
13.8 |
|
antesio-C17 : 1 ω9c |
5.1 |
1.1 |
|
iso-C10 : 0 |
1.1 |
– |
|
iso-C11 : 0 |
2.0 |
– |
|
iso-C14 : 0 |
7.4 |
4.3 |
|
iso-C15 : 0 |
4.6 |
5.5 |
|
iso-C16 : 0 |
36.6 |
12.5 |
|
iso-C17 : 0 |
2.8 |
4.4 |
|
iso-C18 : 0 |
– |
0.9 |
|
iso-C16 : 1-H |
2.8 |
– |
|
Saturated | ||
|
C14 : 0 |
– |
1.1 |
|
C16 : 0 |
2.9 |
19.1 |
|
C17 : 0 |
– |
3.5 |
|
C17 : 0 cyclo |
1.7 |
– |
Table S1 shows that the isolate and S. leeuwenhoekii C34T grew well on all of the ISP media. In general, the isolate formed a white to greyish-white aerial spore mass and a brown substrate mycelium on these media and the S. leeuwenhoekii strain an olivaceous greenish-grey aerial spore mass and a yellowish-white substrate mycelium. A brown diffusible pigment was produced by the isolate on ISP media 1, 2 and 4 whereas S. leeuwenhoekii C34T exhibited yellowish to yellowish-grey diffusible pigments on all the ISP formulations, apart from ISP media 1 and 5.
Whole genome sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from wet biomass of a single colony of the isolate grown on ISP2 agar for 7 days at 28 °C following the protocol provided by MicrobesNG (Birmingham, UK; www.microbesng.uk) and sequenced using a Miseq instrument (Illumina). Genomic DNA libraries were prepared at MicrobesNG using a Nextera XT library preparation kit. The purity and concentration of the extracted genomic DNA was measured using the Microlab star liquid handling system (Hamilton) and libraries determined with the Kapa Biosystem library quantification kit designed for Illumina instruments on a LightCycler 96 real time PCR instrument (Roche). The libraries were sequenced following the 2×250 bp paired-end protocol (MicrobesNG). Reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic software version 0.38 [31] and their quality assessed with in-house scripts and SAMtools, BedTools and BWA-MEM software [32–34]. Reads under 200 bp were discarded and contigs assembled using SPAdes software version 3.1.1 [35]. The draft genome assembly was annotated using the rastweb server [36, 37] with default options and is available from GenBank (accession number WYCT00000000). The isolate was found to have a draft genome size of 8.0 Mb with 175× mean coverage, 1096 contigs and 66 tRNA genes, a single 16S rRNA gene, 7 23S rRNA genes, 7137 coding sequences (CDS) and an in silico G+C content of 73 mol%. Genomic features of the S. leeuwenhoekii have been reported [18].
Phylogeny
An almost full-length 16S rRNA gene sequence (1528 bp; GenBank accession number MK503548) was extracted directly from the draft genome of the isolate using the ContEst16S tool available from the EZBioCloud webserver (www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/contest16s) [38]. The resultant 16S rRNA gene sequence was compared with corresponding sequences of the type strains of the most closely related Streptomyces species retrieved from the EzBiocloud server [39] following multiple sequence alignment generated using muscle software [40]. Pairwise sequence similarities were determined using the single-gene tree option in the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) web server [41, 42]. Phylogenetic trees were inferred using the maximum-likelihood [43], maximum-parsimony [44] and neighbour-joining [45] algorithms. The resultant trees were evaluated using bootstrap analyses based on 1000 replicates [46] from the mega X software package [47] using the two-parameter model of Jukes and Cantor [48]. The trees were rooted using a 16S rRNA gene sequence from Streptomyces albus subsp. albus NRRL B-1811T (GenBank accession number JX486031.1), the type strain of the type species of the genus Streptomyces .
The phylogenetic trees (Fig. 1) show that the isolate forms a well-supported branch in the Streptomyces 16S rRNA gene tree together with S. leeuwenhoekii C34T; the type strain of Streptomyces glomeratus [49] joins this group, albeit with low bootstrap support. Streptomyces chiangmaiensis TA4.1T [50] is associated with this taxon but without statistical support. The isolate shares 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities with these strains of 99.9, 98.8 and 98.9 %, respectively. The last two values are well below the threshold recommended by Meier-Kolthoff et al. [42] for assigning closely related actinobacteria to the same species. The isolate shares sequence similarities of either 98.7 or 98.8 % with the remaining Streptomyces type strains. In general, these results correspond to those reported by Busarakam et al. [14], who noted that relationships between S. leeuwenhoekii C34T and closely related Streptomyces species were sensitive to the treeing algorithms used, indicating that this part of the Streptomyces 16S rRNA gene tree is unstable.
Fig. 1.
Neighbour-joining tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing relationships between isolate PRKS01-65T and the type strains of closely related Streptomyces species. Asterisks indicate branches of the tree that were found using the maximum-likelihood and maximum-parsimony algorithms. MP denote nodesrecovered using the maximum-parsimony tree-making algorithm. Numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap values, only values above 50 % are shown. The root of the tree was established using Streptomyces albus subsp. albus NRRL B-1811T. Bar, 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Multilocus sequence analyses (MLSA) were undertaken based on 2528 nucleotides of partial sequences of five concatenated housekeeping genes: atpD (encodes ATP synthase F1 B-subunit), gyrB (gyrase B subunit), recA (recombinase protein A), rpoB (DNA-directed RNA polymerase B subunit) and trpB (tryptophan synthase B subunit). The resultant MLSA tree (Fig. 2) was based on information taken from the draft genome of the isolate and from available corresponding partial gene sequences of Streptomyces strains accessed from the NCBI GenBank database, the sequence data are presented in Table S2. Pairwise sequence similarities between the datasets were calculated using the GGDC web server [41] and phylogenetic analyses conducted with the GGDC webserver and the DSMZ phylogenomic pipeline [51]. In turn, multiple sequence alignments were generated using muscle software [40] and a maximum-likelihood tree inferred from alignment with RAxML [52] using rapid bootstrapping and the auto maximum-relative-error criterion [53]. In addition, a maximum-parsimony tree was inferred from the alignments with the Tree Analysis New Technology (TNT) program [54] using 1000 bootstraps with tree-bisection-and-reconnection branch swapping and 10 random sequence replicates. The sequences were checked for computational bias using the X2 test, as implemented in PAUP* (Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony) [55].
Fig. 2.
Maximum-likelihood tree based on concatenated partial sequences of five housekeeping genes (2528 nucleotides) showing relationships between isolate PRKS01-65T and its closest phylogenetic neighbours. The tree was inferred using the GTR+GAMMA model. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected numbers of substitutions per site. The numbers above the branches are bootstrap support values of 60 % or over from the maximum-likelihood (left) and maximum-parsimony (right) analyses. Asterisks indicate branches of the tree that were found using the neighbour-joining tree making-algorithm. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position. The root of the tree was established using Streptomyces albus subsp. albus NRRL B-2208T.
It is apparent from the concatenated tree (Fig. 2) that most of the branches are supported by high bootstrap values providing further evidence that Streptomyces phylogenies based on MLSA gene sequences give better resolution than corresponding 16S rRNA gene trees [23, 56]. The MLSA tree underlines the close relationship between the isolate and S. leeuwenhoekii C34T and shows that these strains are part to a well-defined clade that includes the type strains of Streptomyces griceomycini [57, 58], Streptomyces griseostramineus [57, 58] and Streptomyces lomondensis [59]., 60 the type strains of S. glomeratus [49], S. labedae [60] and Streptomyces spinoverrucosus [61] are located towards the periphery of this group. All the strains assigned to this clade produce spiral chains of spiny ornamental spores with the exception of isolate PRKS01-65T and S. leeuwenhoekii C34T [14], which form spiral chains of spores with smooth surfaces. The MLSA evolutionary distances between the isolates ranged from 0.016 to 0.141 (Table S3),; that is, well above the species level threshold of ≤0.007 used to distinguish between closely related species [56, 62]. In the present analyses, the S. leeuwenhoekii strain was found to be related to a markedly different set of Streptomyces type strains when compared with corresponding MLSA data reported by Busarakam et al. [14] who found that relationships between the S. leeuwenhoekii and the type strains of closely related Streptomyces species varied depending on the treeing algorithm used. However, greater confidence can be placed in the results of the present analysis since most of the branches in the tree are supported by high bootstrap values.
A phylogenomic tree was generated based on whole-genome sequences of the isolate and its closest phylogenetic neighbors using the Type (Strain) Genome Server (TYGS) [63] available at http://tygs.dsmz.de. The minimum-evolutionary tree was inferred using FastME 2.1.6.1 software [64] based on the Genome blast Distance Phylogeny (GBDP). Distances were calculated from pairwise genome comparisons using formula d5 [41]. GBDP pseudo-bootstrap support values were calculated using 100 replicates and the tree rooted at the midpoint [65]. The phylogenomic tree (Fig. 3) confirms the close relationship between the isolate and S. leeuwenhoekii C34T as these strains form a well-supported branch in the phlogenomic tree that is sharply separated from corresponding branches composed of the type strains of the most closely related Streptomyces species.
Fig. 3.
Phylogenomic tree showing relationships between isolate PRKS01-65T and the most closely related Streptomyces type strains obtained using the TYGS platform. The number at the nodes are GBDP pseudo-bootstrap support values based on 100 replicates. The average branch support is 96.1 %. The tree is rooted at the midpoint. The accession numbers of genome sequences are given in parentheses.
Genomic characterization
The genome sequence of isolate PRKS01-65T was compared with that of S. leeuwenhoekii C34T (GenBank accession number AZSD0000000). Orthologous average nucleotide identity (orthoANI) [66] and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) [42] values were calculated using the ANI calculator tool from the EZBioCloud (www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani) and the GGDC webserver (http://ggdc.dsmz.de/ggdc), respectively. The genome of the isolate was annotated and assigned to different functional classes using the rastwebserver available at http://rast.nmpdr.org/
The dDDH similarities between the genome of the isolate and S. leeuwenhoekii C34T was 56.0 %, a value well below the 70 % threshold used to assign strains to the same genomic species [67]; the corresponding pairwise orthoANI value of 94.3 % was just below the threshold used to distinguish between closely related prokaryotic species [68, 69]. The relative distribution of the different functional gene classes in the genome of the isolate (Fig. S6) is similar to those found in the genomes of S. leeuwenhoekii C34T, ‘ Streptomyces coelicolor ’ A3(2) [70] and ‘Streptomyces lividans’ 66 [71].
Phenotypic traits
Isolate PRKS01-65T and S. leeuwenhoekii C34T were examined for a broad range of phenotypic properties known to be value in distinguishing between Streptomyces species [8, 30, 72, 73]. The enzymatic profiles of the strains were determined using API-ZYM strips (bioMérieux) and biochemical, degradative and physiological properties using media and methods taken from Williams et al. [73]. The ability of the strains to grow under different temperature and pH regimes and in the presence of various sodium chloride concentrations were recorded using ISP2 agar as the basal medium. pH values were achieved using phosphate buffers. All of these tests were carried out in duplicate using a standard inoculum equivalent to 5.0 on the McFarland scale [74].
Identical results were obtained between the duplicated cultures for all of the phenotypic tests, several of which were weighted to distinguish between the isolate and S. leeuwenhoekii C34T (Table 2). Thus, the isolate, unlike the S. leeuwenhoekii strain, produced β-glucosidase, lipase (C14) and α-mannosidase, hydrolysed urea, and degraded chitin and xanthine. In contrast, only S. leeuwenhoekii C34T formed alkaline phosphatase and esterase (C4), metabolized adenine, elastin, guanine, tributyrin and Tween 40, and grew above pH 7.5 and at 4 and 50 °C. Both strains produced acid phosphatase, α-chymotrypsin, cystine arylamidase, esterase lipase, β-galactosidase, α-acetyl-β-glucoaminidase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, trypsin and valine arylamidase, hydrolysed allantoin and arbutin, degraded hypoxanthine, starch, uric acid and Tween 80, reduced nitrate, and were catalase-positive. Neither strain produced α-fucosidase, α-glucosidase or β-glucoronidase, hydrolysed aesculin, or degraded casein, keratin, xylan or Tweens 20 and 60.
Table 2.
Phenotypic properties that distinguish Streptomyces isolate PRKS01-65T from S. leeuwenhoekii C34T
+, Positive result; −, negative result.
|
Characteristics |
Isolate |
|
|---|---|---|
|
PRKS01-65T |
C34T |
|
|
Cultural characteristics on oatmeal agar | ||
|
Aerial spore mass |
Greyish-olive |
Olivaceous grey-green |
|
Substrate mycelium |
Greyish-olive |
Yellowish-white |
|
Diffusible pigment |
− |
Yellowish |
|
API-ZYM tests | ||
|
Alkaline phosphatase |
− |
+ |
|
Esterase (C4) |
− |
+ |
|
Lipase (C 14) |
+ |
− |
|
α-Mannosidase |
+ |
− |
|
Biochemical test |
|
|
|
Urea hydrolysis |
+ |
− |
|
Degradation tests | ||
|
Adenine |
− |
+ |
|
Chitin |
+ |
− |
|
Elastin |
− |
+ |
|
Guanine |
− |
+ |
|
Tributyrin |
− |
+ |
|
Tween 40 |
− |
+ |
|
Xanthine |
+ |
− |
|
Tolerance tests | ||
|
pH range |
5.5–7.5 |
6.0–11 |
|
Temperature range (°C) |
10–45 |
4–50 |
|
Growth in presence of NaCl (%, w/v) |
1–5 |
1–10 |
The presence of putative biosynthetic gene clusters (BGs) encoding for natural products were sought in the genome of the isolate using the antiSMASH 5.0 platform [75] available at http://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org. AntiSMASH predicts BGCs and prospective products based on the percentage of genes from the closest known BGCs showing significant blast hits to the genome under consideration. In the present study, the genome of the isolate, unlike that of the S. leeuwenhoekii C34T, was associated with the production of several known antibiotics albeit with low gene similarities (<70 %), as exemplified by actinoallolide A (30 %; [76]), enduracidin (6 %; [77]), rustimicin (6 %; [78]) and tautomycin (27 %; [79]). In contrast, only the genome of S. leeuwenhoekii C34T [18] contains the BGCs that express for a new family of ansamycin-like compounds, the chaxamycins, which show potent antibacterial and moderate anticancer activity [80].
It can be concluded from the present study that isolate PRKS01-65T is a bone fide member of the genus Streptomyces . The isolate is closely related to S. leeuwenhoekii C34T, but not especially close to other Streptomyces species. The isolate and the S. leeuwenhoekii strain can be distinguished by a wealth of genotypic and phenotypic data, notably by a low dDDH value. It is proposed that isolate PRKS01-65T (=NCIMB 15211T=CCMM B1302T=ICEBB-03T) be recognized as the type and only strain belonging to Streptomyces harenosi sp. nov. The isolate has a large genome (8 Mb) which contains putatively novel BGCs and hence can be considered gifted in the sense of Baltz [17].
Description of Streptomyces harenosi sp. nov.
Streptomyces harenosi (ha.re.no’si. L. gen. n. harenosi, of a sandy place referring to the source of the organism).
Aerobic, Gram-stain positive, catalase-positive actinobacterium which forms an extensively branched substrate mycelium that bears aerial hyphae which differentiate into spiral chains of spores (0.8×1.0 µm) with smooth surfaces on yeast extract–malt extract agar. Brown diffusible pigments are formed on tryptone–yeast extract, yeast extract–malt extract and inorganic salts–starch agar. Grows from 10 to 45 °C, optimally at 28 °C, from pH 5.5 to 7.5, optimally at pH 7.0 and in the presence up to 5 % w/v NaCl. Allantoin, arbutin and urea are hydrolysed but not aesculin. Nitrate is reduced. Degrades chitin, hypoxanthine, starch, Tween 80, l-tyrosine, uric acid and xanthine, but not adenine, casein, elastin, keratin, Tween 20, tributyrin or xylan. Positive for acid phosphatase, α-chymotrypsin, cystine arylamidase, esterase lipase, β-galactosidase, α-acetyl-β-glucoaminidase, β-glucosidase, α-mannosidase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, trypsin and valine arylamidase, but negative for α-fucosidase, α-glucosidase and β-glucoronidase. Whole-organism hydrolysates are rich in ll-A2pm, galactose and ribose, the predominant fatty acids are antesio-C15 : 0 and iso-C16 : 0, the major menaquinone is MK-9 (H8), and phosphatidylethanolamine is the diagnostic phospholipid. The DNA G+C content of the type strain is 73.36 mol% and the approximate genome size 8.0 Mb.
The type strain, PRKS01-65T (=NCIMB 15211T=CCMM B1302T=ICEBB-03T), was isolated from a sandy soil sample collected from an arid sand dune at Parangkusumo, Yogyakarta Province, Java, Indonesia. The GenBank accession number of the assembled draft genome of strain PRKS01-65T is WYCT00000000.
Supplementary Data
Funding information
A.B.K. is grateful for financial support awarded through the PhD Scholarship Scheme of the Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), Ministry of Finance, Indonesia. I.N. is grateful to Newcastle University for providing a postdoctoral fellowship and M.G. for an Emeritus Fellowship from the Leverhulme Trust.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to Mr. Ja’far Abdurrahman and Mr. Faiz Muhammad for helping to collect the composite environmental sample. We are indebted to Dr. Arief Budi Wietarto and Mr. Izzul Islam for their encouragement and support, to Mr. Piotr Czerniejewski for his help in Linux scripting, and to Professor Aharon Oren (The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel) for suggesting the species name of the organism.
Author contributions
M.G., H.-P.K. and A.B.K designed the study, M.G and A.B.K prepared the manuscript. A.B.K. helped to collect the soil sample, characterized the strain under the supervision of I.N and M.G and deposited it in the culture collections. A.B.K. and I.N. were responsible for genome sequencing, annotation and the genome analyses. All of the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: AntiSMASH, antibiotics and secondary metabolite analysis shell; atpD, ATP synthase F1-subunit; BGCs, biosynthetic gene clusters; dDDH, digital DNA-DNA hybridization; GBDP, genome BLAST distance phylogeny; GGDC, genome-to-genome distance calculator; gyrB, gyrase B subunit; ISP, International Streptomyces Project; MLSA, multilocus sequence analyses; orthoANI, orthologous average nucleotide identity; RAST, rapid annotation using subsystem technology; recA, recombinase protein A; rpoB, DNA-directed RNA polymerase B subunit; trpB, tryptophan synthase B subunit; TYGS, type strain genome server.
Six supplementary figures and three supplementary tables are available with the online version of this article.
The DDBJ/ENA/GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene and genome sequences of strain PRKS01-65T are MK503548 and WYCT00000000, respectively. The version of whole genome sequence described in this paper is version WYCT01000000. The five housekeeping genes of strain PRKS01-65T used in the MLSA study were deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: atpD (MN938914), gyrB (MN938915), recA (MN938916), rpoB (MN938917) and trpB (MN938918).
References
- 1.Waksman SA, Henrici AT. The nomenclature and classification of the actinomycetes. J Bacteriol. 1943;46:337–341. doi: 10.1128/JB.46.4.337-341.1943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nouioui I, Carro L, Garcia-Lopez M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T, et al. Genome-based-taxonomic classification of the phylum Actinobacteria . Front Microbiol. 2007;2018:9. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Labeda DP, Goodfellow M, Brown R, Ward AC, Lanoot B, et al. Phylogenetic study of the species within the family Streptomycetaceae . Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;101:73–104. doi: 10.1007/s10482-011-9656-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Labeda DP, Dunlap CA, Rong X, Huang Y, Doroghazi JR, et al. Phylogenetic relationships in the family Streptomycetaceae using multi-locus sequence analysis. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:563–583. doi: 10.1007/s10482-016-0824-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Barka EA, Vatsa P, Sanchez L, Gaveau-Vaillant N, Jacquard C, et al. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of actinobacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016;80:1–43. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00019-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Katz L, Baltz RH. Natural product discovery: past, present, and future. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;43:155–176. doi: 10.1007/s10295-015-1723-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhu H, Swierstra J, Wu C, Girard G, Choi YH, et al. Eliciting antibiotics active against the ESKAPE pathogens in a collection of actinomycetes isolated from mountain soils. Microbiology. 2014;160:1714–1725. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.078295-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.van der Aart LT, Nouioui I, Kloosterman A, Igual J-M, Willemse J, et al. Polyphasic classification of the gifted natural product producer Streptomyces roseifaciens sp. nov . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;69:899–908. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goodfellow M, Fiedler H-P. A guide to successful bioprospecting: informed by actinobacterial Systematics. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2010;98:119–142. doi: 10.1007/s10482-010-9460-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goodfellow M, Nouioui I, Sanderson R, Xie F, Bull AT. Rare taxa and dark microbial matter: novel bioactive actinobacteria abound in Atacama desert soils. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2018;111:1315–1332. doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1088-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bull AT, Goodfellow M. Dark, rare and inspirational microbial matter in the extremobiosphere: 16 000 M of bioprospecting campaigns. Microbiology. 2019;165:1252–1264. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sayed AM, Hassan MHA, Alhadrami HA, Hassan HM, Goodfellow M, et al. Extreme environments: microbiology leading to specialized metabolites. J Appl Microbiol. 2020;128:630–657. doi: 10.1111/jam.14386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Okoro CK, Brown R, Jones AL, Andrews BA, Asenjo JA, et al. Diversity of culturable actinomycetes in hyper-arid soils of the Atacama desert, Chile. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2009;95:121–133. doi: 10.1007/s10482-008-9295-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Busarakam K, Bull AT, Girard G, Labeda DP, van Wezel GP, et al. Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii sp. nov., the producer of chaxalactins and chaxamycins, forms a distinct branch in Streptomyces gene trees. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2014;105:849–861. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0139-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Abdelkader MSA, Philippon T, Asenjo JA, Bull AT, Goodfellow M, et al. Asenjonamides A–C, antibacterial metabolites isolated from Streptomyces asenjonii strain KNN 42.f from an extreme-hyper arid Atacama desert soil. J Antibiot. 2018;71:425–431. doi: 10.1038/s41429-017-0012-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rateb ME, Ebel R, Jaspars M. Natural product diversity of actinobacteria in the Atacama desert. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2018;111:1467–1477. doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1030-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Baltz RH. Gifted microbes for genome mining and natural product discovery. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;44:573–588. doi: 10.1007/s10295-016-1815-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gomez-Escribano JP, Castro JF, Razmilic V, Chandra G, Andrews B, et al. The Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii genome: de novo sequencing and assembly in single contigs of the chromosome, circular plasmid pSLE1 and linear plasmid pSLE2. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:485. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1652-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ziemert N, Alanjary M, Weber T. The evolution of genome mining in microbes - a review. Nat Prod Rep. 2016;33:988–1005. doi: 10.1039/C6NP00025H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sekurova ON, Schneider O, Zotchev SB. Novel bioactive natural products from bacteria via bioprospecting, genome mining and metabolic engineering. Microb Biotechnol. 2019;12:828–844. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Idris H. Actinobacterial Diversity in Atacama Desert Habitats as a Road Map to Biodiscovery. PhD Thesis. Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.: Newcastle University,; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1966;16:313–340. doi: 10.1099/00207713-16-3-313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Goodfellow M, Busarakam K, Idris H, Labeda DP, Nouioui I, et al. Streptomyces asenjonii sp. nov., isolated from hyper-arid Atacama desert soils and emended description of Streptomyces viridosporus Pridham et al. 1958. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:1133–1148. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0886-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol. 1974;28:226–231. doi: 10.1128/AEM.28.2.226-231.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier H. Chemical composition as a criterion in the classification of aerobic actinomycetes. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1970;20:435–443. doi: 10.1099/00207713-20-4-435. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M, et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods. 1984;2:233–241. doi: 10.1016/0167-7012(84)90018-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids. (MIDI Inc Technical Notes) 1990;vol. 101:1. p. [Google Scholar]
- 28.O'Donnell AG, Falconer C, Goodfellow M, Ward AC, Williams E. Biosystematics and diversity amongst novel carboxydotrophic actinomycetes. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1993;64:325–340. doi: 10.1007/BF00873091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kelly K. Color-Name Charts Illustrated with Centroid Colors. Chicago: Inter-Society Color Council-National Bureau of Standards; 1953. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kämpfer P, et al. Genus 1. Streptomyces Waksman and Henrici 1943, 339AL emend. Rainey, Ward-Rainey and Stackebrandt, 1997, 486, emend. Kim, Lonsdale, Seong and Goodfellow 2003b, 113, emend. Zhi, Li and Stackebrandt 2009, 600. In: Goodfellow M, Kämpfer P, Busse H-J, Trujillo ME, Suzuki K-I, et al., editors. The Actinobacteria Part B. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd edn. volume 5. New York: Springer; 2012. pp. 1455–1767. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, et al. 1000 genome project data processing subgroup, the sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Compu Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, et al. The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST) Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H, et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:2053–2057. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Edgar RC. Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Spröer C, Klenk H-P. When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy? Arch Microbiol. 2013;195:413–418. doi: 10.1007/s00203-013-0888-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17:368–376. doi: 10.1007/BF01734359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool. 1971;20:406. doi: 10.2307/2412116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of Protein Molecules. Vol. 3. London: Academic Press; 1969. pp. 21–132. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gause GF, Preobrazhenskaya TP. Validation List no. 22. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1986;36:573–576. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Promnuan Y, Kudo T, Ohkuma M, Chantawannakul P. Streptomyces chiangmaiensis sp. nov. and Streptomyces lannensis sp. nov., isolated from the South-East Asian stingless bee (Tetragonilla collina) Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63:1896–1901. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.045930-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen J, Scheuner C, Michael V, et al. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083(T), the type strain (U5/41(T)) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand Genomic Sci. 2014;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1944-3277-9-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? J Comput Biol. 2010;17:337–354. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2009.0179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon KC. Tnt, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics. 2008;24:774–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00217.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Swofford D. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0 B10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rong X, Huang Y. Multi-Locus sequence analysis: taking prokaryotic systematics to the next level. Meth Microbiol. 2014;41:221–251. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Preobrazhenskaya TP, Blinov NO, Ryabova ID. In: Problems of Classification of Actinomycetes-Antagonists. Gauze GF, Preobrazhenskaya TP, Kudirna ES, Blinov NO, Ryabova ID, et al., editors. Medgiz, Moscow: USSR: Government Publishing House of Medical Literature; 1957. pp. 1–398. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pridham TG, Hesseltine CW, Benedict RG. A guide for the classification of streptomycetes according to selected groups; placement of strains in morphological sections. Appl Microbiol. 1958;6:52–79. doi: 10.1128/AEM.6.1.52-79.1958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Johnson LE, Dietz A. Lomofungin, a new antibiotic produced by Streptomyces lomondensis sp. N. Appl Microbiol. 1969;17:755–759. doi: 10.1128/AEM.17.5.755-759.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lacey J. Nomenclature of Saccharopolyspora erythraea Labeda 1987 and Streptomyces erythraeus (Waksman 1923) Waksman and Henrici 1948, and proposals for the alternative epithet Streptomyces labedae sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1987;37:458. doi: 10.1099/00207713-37-4-458. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Diab A, Al-Gounaim MY. Streptomyces spinoverrucosus, a new species from the air of Kuwait. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1982;32:327–331. doi: 10.1099/00207713-32-3-327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rong X, Huang Y. Taxonomic evaluation of the Streptomyces hygroscopicus clade using multilocus sequence analysis and DNA-DNA hybridization, validating the MLSA scheme for Systematics of the whole genus. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2012;35:7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:2798–2800. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat. 1972;106:645–668. doi: 10.1086/282802. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:1100–1103. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, et al. Report of the AD hoc Committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial Systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1987;37:463–464. doi: 10.1099/00207713-37-4-463. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chun J, Rainey FA. Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the Bacteria and Archaea . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:316–324. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.054171-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bentley SD, Chater KF, Cerdeño-Tárraga A-M, Challis GL, Thomson NR, et al. Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) Nature. 2002;417:141–147. doi: 10.1038/417141a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Cruz-Morales P, Vijgenboom E, Iruegas-Bocardo F, Girard G, Yáñez-Guerra LA, et al. The genome sequence of Streptomyces lividans 66 reveals a novel tRNA-dependent peptide biosynthetic system within a metal-related genomic island. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5:1165–1175. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Wellington EM, Sneath PH, et al. Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. J Gen Microbiol. 1983;129:1743–1813. doi: 10.1099/00221287-129-6-1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Idris H, Labeda DP, Nouioui I, Castro JF, Del Carmen Montero-Calasanz M, Montero-Calasanz MDC, et al. Streptomyces aridus sp. nov., isolated from a high altitude Atacama desert soil and emended description of Streptomyces noboritoensis Isono et al. 1957. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:705–717. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0838-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Murray P, Barron E, Phaller M, Ternover J, Yolkken R. Manual of clinical microbiology. Mycopathologia. 1999;146:107–108. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N, et al. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W81–W87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Inahashi Y, Iwatsuki M, Ishiyama A, Matsumoto A, Hirose T, et al. Actinoallolides A-E, new anti-trypanosomal macrolides, produced by an endophytic actinomycete, Actinoallomurus fulvus MK10-036. Org Lett. 2015;17:864–867. doi: 10.1021/ol5037216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Higashide E, Hatano K, Shibata M, Enduracidin NK. A new antibiotic I. Streptomyces fungicidicus No. B5477, an enduracidin producing organism. J Antibiot. 1968;21:126–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Mandala SM, Thornton RA, Milligan J, Rosenbach M, Garcia-Calvo M, et al. Rustmicin, a potent antifungal agent, inhibits sphingolipid synthesis at inositol phosphoceramide synthase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:14942–14949. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.24.14942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.MacKintosh C, Klumpp S. Tautomycin from the bacterium Streptomyces verticillatus. another potent and specific inhibitor of protein phosphatases 1 and 2A. FEBS Lett. 1990;277:137–140. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80828-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Castro JF, Razmilic V, Gomez-Escribano JP, Andrews B, Asenjo J, et al. The ‘gifted’ actinomycete Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii . Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2018;111:1433–1448. doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1034-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



