Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2020 Aug 17;70(9):5063–5074. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004380

Strains of Bradyrhizobium cosmicum sp. nov., isolated from contrasting habitats in Japan and Canada possess photosynthesis gene clusters with the hallmark of genomic islands

Sawa Wasai-Hara 1, Kiwamu Minamisawa 1, Sylvie Cloutier 2, Eden S P Bromfield 2,*
PMCID: PMC7656271  PMID: 32804606

Abstract

The taxonomic status of two previously characterized Bradyrhizobium strains (58S1T and S23321) isolated from contrasting habitats in Canada and Japan was verified by genomic and phenotypic analyses. Phylogenetic analyses of five and 27 concatenated protein-encoding core gene sequences placed both strains in a highly supported lineage distinct from named species in the genus Bradyrhizobium with Bradyrhizobium betae as the closest relative. Average nucleotide identity values of genome sequences between the test and reference strains were between 84.5 and 94.2 %, which is below the threshold value for bacterial species circumscription. The complete genomes of strains 58S1T and S23321 consist of single chromosomes of 7.30 and 7.23 Mbp, respectively, and do not have symbiosis islands. The genomes of both strains have a G+C content of 64.3 mol%. Present in the genome of these strains is a photosynthesis gene cluster (PGC) containing key photosynthesis genes. A tRNA gene and its partial tandem duplication were found at the boundaries of the PGC region in both strains, which is likely the hallmark of genomic island insertion. Key nitrogen-fixation genes were detected in the genomes of both strains, but nodulation and type III secretion system genes were not found. Sequence analysis of the nitrogen fixation gene, nifH, placed 58S1T and S23321 in a novel lineage distinct from described Bradyrhizobium species. Data for phenotypic tests, including growth characteristics and carbon source utilization, supported the sequence-based analyses. Based on the data presented here, a novel species with the name Bradyrhizobium cosmicum sp. nov. is proposed with 58S1T (=LMG 31545T=HAMBI 3725T) as the type strain.

Keywords: Bradyrhizobium cosmicum, complete genome sequence, genomic island, photosynthesis gene cluster


The genus Bradyrhizobium is a large and diverse group of bacterial species and includes members that possess accessory genes for nitrogen fixation, photosynthesis and/or symbiotic interaction with legume plants [1].

In a previous study [2], bacteria were isolated from root nodules of soybean plants that had been inoculated with root-zone soils from legumes native to Canada. Bacterial isolates were characterized by multiple locus sequence analysis (MLSA) of five protein-encoding core genes and several novel lineages in the genus Bradyrhizobium were identified. One of these novel lineages, represented by strain 58S1T, is a close relative of Bradyrhizobium betae PL7HG1T [3] that was recently reported to harbour key photosystem genes [4].

During the course of the present work we showed that strain 58S1T also possesses photosystem genes and, based on results of taxonomic analyses, is highly similar to Bradyrhizobium sp. S23321 [5], which was isolated from paddy field soil in Japan and has been subjected to detailed genomic analysis.

Here we used complete genome, phylogenetic and phenotypic analyses to further characterize strains 58S1T and S23321 and based on the results a novel species for which the name Bradyrhizobium cosmicum sp. nov. is proposed.

Habitat and isolation

Novel strain 58S1T was isolated from a root nodule of a soybean plant that had been inoculated with a suspension of root-zone soil of Amphicarpaea bracteata (hog peanut) plants growing in deciduous woodland in Gatineau, Quebec, Canada [2]. Strain 58S1T was deposited in the BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection, University of Ghent, Belgium (LMG collection no. 31545) and in the HAMBI Microbial Culture Collection, University of Helsinki, Finland (HAMBI collection no. 3725). Novel strain S23321 was isolated from paddy field soil at the experimental farm of Tohoku University, Japan [5] and was deposited in the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM collection no. 18004).

Phylogenetic characterization of partial gene sequences

For phylogenetic analyses, sequences of 16S rRNA, atpD, glnII, gyrB, recA and rpoB core genes were used. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers are given in Table S1 (available in the online version of this article). Sequence alignments of protein-encoding core genes (atpD, glnII, gyrB, recA and rpoB) were carried out as previously described [6]. Alignment of 16S rRNA gene sequences was done using the fast, secondary-structure aware Infernal aligner version 1.1 using the online Ribosomal Database Project version 11.5 [7]. Best-fit substitution models were selected using ModelTest-NG [8] implemented in the cipres Science Gateway version 3.3 [9]. Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses [10] were performed using 1000 non-parametric bootstrap replications to assess support [6]. Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were carried out using MrBayes version 3.2.1 with default priors [11] as detailed previously [12]. In all instances, tree topologies from Bayesian and ML analyses were similar and therefore only the Bayesian trees are shown.

In order to include all described species of the genus Bradyrhizobium in a phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences, it was necessary to trim aligned sequence lengths to 1300 bp. The 16S rRNA gene tree (Fig. S1) shows that novel strains 58S1T and S23321 possess identical 16S rRNA gene sequences and were placed in a superclade represented by Bradyrhizobium japonicum with the type strain of B. betae their as closest relative. Sequence similarities of the 16S rRNA gene of these Bradyrhizobium species versus 58S1T and S23321 (Table S2), calculated using software implemented in EzBioCloud [13], are consistent with the phylogenetic data indicating that B. betae is the closest relative. It should be noted, however, that the 16S rRNA gene is highly conserved and its usefulness as a taxonomic marker for species delineation in the genus Bradyrhizobium is limited [14, 15].

MLSA of five or more core gene sequences represents a widely used and reliable method for phylogenetic analysis and delineation of species within the genus Bradyrhizobium [6, 15–17]. The Bayesian tree of five concatenated protein-encoding core gene sequences (Fig. 1) placed strains 58S1T and S23321 in a highly supported lineage distinct from described Bradyrhizobium species with B. betae PL7HG1T as the closest relative. Similar results were obtained for the trees of individual core gene sequences (Figs S2–S6).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Bayesian phylogenetic tree (GTR+G+I substitution model) of atpD–glnII–recA–gyrB–rpoB concatenated housekeeping gene sequences for Bradyrhizobium cosmicum sp. nov. and reference taxa of the genus Bradyrhizobium . Alignment lengths: atpD, 429 bp; glnII, 519 bp; recA, 417 bp; gyrB, 600 bp; rpoB, 714 bp; total, 2679 bp. Posterior probabilities ≥0.90 are shown. Bar, expected substitutions per site.

As one or more core gene sequences of type strains of several Bradyrhizobium species are not available in public databases, we carried out a supplementary phylogenetic analysis using the only two gene sequences (recA and glnII) that are available for all described species. In order to include all type strains of these species in the analysis, it was necessary to trim the aligned sequence lengths to 411 and 519 bp for the recA and glnII genes, respectively. The topology of the Bayesian tree of concatenated recA–glnII gene sequences (Fig. S7) corroborates the placement of novel strains 58S1T and S23321 in a lineage distinct from named species of the genus Bradyrhizobium .

Percentage sequence similarities for 58S1T and S23321 versus type strains of reference taxa for the five concatenated core gene sequences, calculated by the method of Stothard [18] (Table S2), were at or below the threshold value of ~97% proposed for species differentiation in the genus Bradyrhizobium [19].

A Bayesian tree of partial sequences of the nifH gene for 58S1T and S23321 and type strains of Bradyrhizobium species is given in Fig. 2. The nifH gene tree shows that 58S1T and S23321 are placed in a lineage that is distinct from described Bradyrhizobium species. Closest relatives include type strains of Bradyrhizobium amphicarpaeae , Bradyrhizobium oligotrophicum and Bradyrhizobium denitrificans that possess photosystem genes and Bradyrhizobium guangxiense, Bradyrhizobium nitroreducens and Bradyrhizobium sacchari that do not possess photosystem genes. Sequence similarity values for the nifH gene of 58S1T and S23321 in pairwise comparisons with Bradyrhizobium reference taxa were between 83.5 and 93.0 % (Table S2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Bayesian phylogenetic tree (HKY+G substitution model) of nifH gene sequences (540 bp) for Bradyrhizobium cosmicum sp. nov. and reference taxa of the genus Bradyrhizobium . Posterior probabilities ≥0.90 are shown. Bar, expected substitutions per site.

Genomic characterization

The complete genome of strain 58S1T was sequenced at the Genome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, Canada, using the Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) RS II single-molecule real-time (SMRT) platform [20] as described previously [21]. Estimated genome coverage for strain 58S1T was 136-fold with 104 918 polymerase reads and an average read length of 13 299 bp. The complete genome sequence of S23321 was determined in a previous study [5] by a whole genome shotgun approach using hybrid assembly of Sanger end sequences consisting of 3 kb and 10 kb clone libraries (53 760 reads, 4.5-fold genome coverage) and 454 pyrosequencing data with appropriate gap filling procedures.

The complete genomes of strains 58S1T and S23321 consist of single circular chromosomes of size 7 304 136 bp and 7 231 841 bp, respectively. These genomes are similar in size to close relative, B. betae PL7HG1T, with a complete genome of size 7 419 402 bp (Table 1). However, unlike B. betae PL7HG1T, novel strains 58S1T and S23321 do not possess plasmids [4].

Table 1.

Characteristics of genome sequences of Bradyrhizobium cosmicum sp. nov., strains 58S1T (accession no. CP041656) and S23321 (accession no. AP012279) and close relatives, Bradyrhizobium betae PL7HG1T (accession no. CP044543), Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T (accession no. CP011360) and Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 6T (accession no. AP012206)

Unless otherwise stated, data are from the NCBI assembly databases. na, Data not available.

Characteristic

Strain

58 S1T

S23321

PL7HG1T

USDA110T

USDA6T

Genome assembly quality

Complete

Complete

Complete

Complete

Complete

Genome size (bp)

7 304 136

7 231 841

7 419 402

9 105 828

9 207 384

CDS (total)

6930

6983*

7113

8489

9447*

CDS (coding)

6757

6898†

6780

8220

8829‡

rRNAs

3

3

3

3

6‡

tRNAs

48

45†

47

52

51‡

Pseudo genes (total)

173

122†

333

213

na

Repeat regions

58*

na

58*

148*

128*

DNA G+C content (mol%)

64.3*

64.3†

64.8§

64.1*

63.7‡

Photosynthesis gene cluster

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Plasmids

0

0

1

0

0

Symbiosis island

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

*Data from the patric Bioinformatics Database [24].

†Data from Okubo et al. 2012 [5].

‡Data from Kaneko et al. 2011 [49].

§Data from Cloutier and Bromfield 2019 [4].

The DNA G+C content of strains 58S1T and S23321 is 64.3 mol%, which is within the range for members of the genus Bradyrhizobium . Totals of 6930 coding sequences, 48 tRNAs and a single rRNA operon were found for strain 58S1T using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline version 4 [22, 23]. For strain S23321, 6983 coding sequences, 45 tRNAs and a single rRNA operon were detected using the patric version 3.5.26 platform [24].

The most abundant genes for strains 58S1T and S23321, respectively, are those involved in metabolism (1045 and 1007 genes), energy (310 and 301 genes), protein processing (235 and 229 genes), membrane transport (231 and 246 genes) and cellular processes (175 and 160 genes). Genes involved in motility and chemotaxis, stress response (heat/cold and osmotic shock), resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds were also detected in both 58S1T and S23321.

Average nucleotide identity (ANI) as an overall genome relatedness index is recommended to replace DNA–DNA hybridization methods for bacterial species delineation [14, 15, 25, 26]. We estimated ANI values for the complete genome sequence of 58S1T and S23321 in pairwise comparisons with genome sequences of type strains of described Bradyrhizobium species available in public databases using the MUMmer (ANIm) algorithm implemented in the J-species web server version 3.0.20 [27]. Table 2 shows that, compared to 58S1T and S23321, ANI values varied between 84.4 % ( B. retamae Ro19T) and 94.2 % ( B. betae PL7HG1T), which is below the accepted threshold value of 95–96  % for bacterial species circumscription [14, 25, 28]. In contrast, the ANI value of 97.9% for the comparison of novel strains 58S1T versus S23321 is consistent with these strains belonging to the same species. These data are also in accord with the phylogenetic results (Fig. 1) indicating that B. betae PL7HG1T is a close relative of novel strains 58S1T and S23321.

Table 2.

Average nucleotide identity (ANI) values for pairwise comparisons of genome sequences of Bradyrhizobium cosmicum sp. nov 58S1T and S23321 versus Bradyrhizobium species in public databases

Reference strain (accession no.)

ANI (%)

Reference strain (accession no.)

ANI (%)

58 S1T

S23321

58 S1T

S23321

Bradyrhizobium cosmicum 58 S1T

(CP041656)

97.9

Bradyrhizobium guangdongense CCBAU 51649T (CP030051)

87.7

 87.8

Bradyrhizobiumcosmicum S23321

(AP012279)

97.9

 –

Bradyrhizobium manausense BR 3351T (LJYG00000000)

87.7

 87.7

Bradyrhizobium betae PL7HG1T

(CP044543)

94.1

 94.2

Bradyrhizobium centrolobii BR 10245T (LUUB00000000)

87.7

 87.7

Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110T (CP011360)

89.4

 89.4

Bradyrhizobium neotropicale BR 10247T (LSEF00000000)

87.6

 87.6

Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 6T

(AP012206)

89.4

 89.4

Bradyrhizobium ivorense CI-1BT (CDFC00000000)

85.3

 85.3

Bradyrhizobium niftali CNPSo 3448T (SPQT00000000)

89.4

 89.4

Bradyrhizobium brasilense UFLA03-321T (MPVQ00000000)

85.3

 85.3

Bradyrhizobium. stylosanthis BR 446T (LVEM00000000)

88.8

 88.9

Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA76T (ARAG01000000)

85.3

 85.3

Bradyrhizobium. arachidis CCBAU 051107T (FPBQ00000000)

88.8

 88.8

Bradyrhizobium mercantei SEMIA 6399T (MKFI00000000)

85.3

 85.3

Bradyrhizobium symbiodeficiens 85S1MBT (CP029427)

88.8

 88.8

Bradyrhizobium uaiense UFLA03-164T (VKHP00000000)

85.2

 85.2

Bradyrhizobium ottawaense OO99T

(CP029425)

88.8

 88.8

Bradyrhizobium tropiciagri CNPSo 1112T (LFLZ00000000)

85.2

 85.3

Bradyrhizobium shewense ERR11T (FMAI00000000)

88.7

 88.8

Bradyrhizobium embrapense CNPSo 2833T (LFIP00000000)

85.2

 85.2

Bradyrhizobium amphicarpaeae 39S1MBT (CP029426)

88.6

 88.6

Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi PAC48T (LFIQ00000000)

85.2

 85.3

Bradyrhizobium nitroreducens TSA1T (LFJC00000000)

88.6

 88.6

Bradyrhizobium viridifuturi SEMIA 690T (LGTB00000000)

85.2

 85.2

Bradyrhizobium frederickii CNPSo 3426T (SPQS00000000)

88.6

 88.6

Bradyrhizobium macuxiense BR 10303T (LNCU00000000)

85.1

 85.1

Bradyrhizobium zhanjiangense CCBAU 51778T (CP022221)

88.6

 88.6

Bradyrhizobium oligotrophicum S58T (AP012603)

84.8

 84.9

Bradyrhizobium forestalis INPA54BT (PGVG00000000)

88.6

 88.6

Bradyrhizobium lablabi CCBAU 23086T (LLYB00000000)

84.7

 84.7

Bradyrhizobium sacchari BR 10280T (LWIG00000000)

88.5

 88.5

Bradyrhizobium jicamae PAC68T

(LLXZ00000000)

84.7

 84.6

Bradyrhizobium nanningense CCBAU 53390T (LBJC00000000)

88.4

 88.4

Bradyrhizobium paxllaeri LMTR 21T (MAXB00000000)

84.7

 84.7

Bradyrhizobium vignae 7-2T

(RDQF00000000)

88.3

 88.3

Bradyrhizobium algeriense RST89T (PYCM00000000)

84.6

 84.5

Bradyrhizobium guangxiense CCBAU 53363T (CP022219)

88.3

 88.3

Bradyrhizobium valentinum LmjM3T (LLXX00000000)

84.5

 84.5

Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense CCBAU10071T (FMAE00000000)

88.2

88.2

Bradyrhizobium icense LMTR 13T

(CP016428)

84.5

 84.5

Bradyrhizobium guangzhouense CCBAU 51670T (CP030053)

87.8

87.8

Bradyrhizobium retamae Ro19T

(LLYA00000000)

84.4

 84.5

Phylogenomic relationships were investigated employing amino acid sequences of 27 conserved marker genes obtained from the genomes of 41 type strains of Bradyrhizobium species available in public databases using AmphoraNet [29], a web-based implementation of amphora2 [30]. Sequences were aligned with muscle [31] and then processed with TrimAl [32] to remove poorly aligned regions. Alignments were concatenated and the best-fit amino acid substitution model was selected using ModelTest-NG [8]. The placement of taxa in a Bayesian phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3) corroborates our finding that the closest relative of novel strains 58S1T and S23321 is B. betae PL7HG1T. Fig. 3 also shows that the 41 Bradyrhizobium type strains were divided into four highly supported ‘superclades’ represented by type strains of B. japonicum , B. oligotrophicum , B. elkanii and B. jicamae , with novel strains 58S1T and S23321 placed in the superclade represented by B. japonicum . These four superclades have also been identified in other phylogenetic studies of the genus Bradyrhizobium (e.g. [1, 33, 34]). It is noteworthy that the overall topology of the tree in Fig. 3 is consistent with the tree in Fig. 1, thereby validating the use of five concatenated core gene sequences for species delineation.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Bayesian phylogenetic tree (JTT +G+I substitution model) inferred from 27 concatenated protein encoding gene sequences for strains of Bradyrhizobium cosmicum sp. nov. and type strains of 41 Bradyrhizobium species. Alignment lengths (amino acids): frr, 191; infC, 196; nusA, 536; pgk, 394; pyrG, 545; rplA, 232; rplB, 196; rplC, 244; rplE, 201; rplF, 178; rplK, 142; rplL, 124; rplM, 170; rplN, 128; rplP, 141; rplS, 139; rpmA, 94; rpoB, 1030; rpsB, 342; rpsC, 237; rpsE, 193; rpsI, 158; rpsK, 130; rpsM, 131; rpsS, 96; smpB, 158; tsf, 308; total, 6634. Posterior probabilities ≥0.90 are shown. Bar, expected substitutions per site.

Further genomic analysis of novel strains was done using GenomeMatcher software [35]. Circular representation of genomes (Fig. 4a–c) shows that strain 58S1T has high similarity to S23321 throughout its genome whereas similarity of both novel strains to B. betae PL7HG1T is relatively low. These observations are consistent with expectations for comparisons within and between Bradyrhizobium species. Comparison with the genome of soybean-nodulating bacterium B. diazoefficiens USDA 110T [36], show that novel strains 58S1T and S23321, like close relative B. betae PL7HG1T, do not contain a symbiosis island that carries nodulation genes (nodDYABCSUIJ) or type III secretion systems (T3SS) genes required for symbiotic interaction with leguminous plants (Fig. 4d, Table 1). However, key genes for nitrogen fixation, including nifDKEN, nifH, nifA and fixABCX, were detected in the genomes of 58S1T and S23321 but not in the genome of B. betae PL7HG1T. It is noteworthy that the organization of the nif–fix gene cluster is highly conserved in novel strains 58S1T and S23321 (Fig. S8).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Circular representation of the chromosome of strains 58S1T (a), S23321 (b), Bradyrhizobium betae PL7HG1T (c) and Bradyrhizobium diaozefficiens USDA110T (d). The innermost circle shows G+C content (blue and green indicate a value lower and higher than the average, respectively). The orange bars in the second inner circle denote genomic islands as predicted by IslandViewer 4 [41]. The inner third to fifth circles indicate the blastn homology (bl2seq, calculated by GenomeMatcher [35] with the respective strains of Bradyrhizobium , where the percent of blastn homology is indicated in the colour bar at the bottom. Numbers on outermost circles indicate genomic positions (Mb) on each chromosome. The position of the symbiosis island is shown on the circular presentation of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens USDA 110 [36, 49]. Orange, green, yellow and blue arrowheads show the positions of the photosynthesis gene cluster (PGC), nif, nod and type III secretion system (T3SS) genes, respectively.

Further analyses show that the genomes of strains 58S1T and S23321 [5] contain, respectively, a photosynthesis gene cluster (PGC) of about 51 kb (coordinates, 1 481046–1 532017 bp and 1998217–2 049181 bp). The PGC in both novel strains contains key photosynthesis genes encoding the light-harvesting protein beta and alpha subunits (pufBA) and reaction centre L, M and H subunits (pufLM and puhA). Genes coding for bacteriochlorophyll (bchIDOCXYZGPFNBHLM and acsF), carotenoid (crtIBCDEF), photosynthesis repressor proteins (ppsR1 and ppsR2) and bacteriophytochrome (bphP) are also present (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Comparative arrangement of the photosynthesis gene cluster (PGC) among Bradyrhizobium cosmicum 58S1T and S23321, Bradyrhizobium betae PL7HG1T, Bradyrhizobium amphicarpaeae 39S1MBT, Bradyrhizobium oligotrophicum S58T and Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009. Colour coding represents % homology based on amino acid sequences of PGC genes calculated by GenomeMatcher [35].

The arrangement of genes in the PGC of 58S1T and S23321 is similar to that in B. betae PL7HG1T [4] isolated from a tumour on the roots of sugar beet [3], B. amphicarpaeae 39S1MBT [37] isolated from a root nodule of soybean [2] and to Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009 [38]. In contrast, the arrangement of the genes in the PGC of strains 58S1T and S23321 differs from B. oligotrophicum S58T [39], a Nod factor-independent symbiont of the semi-aquatic legume, Aeschynomene indica (Fig. 5).

Harr plot analysis [40] was employed to further characterize the genomic structure of strains 58S1T, S23321 and B. betae PL7HG1T using GenomeMatcher software [35]. The results, based on comparisons with 58S1T, reveal colinearity of genomes (i.e. similar genes in two strains are in the same relative positions in their genomes) except for the PGC regions which are markedly nonlinear (Fig. 6a, c). Although the IslandViewer 4 [41] suite of programs did not predict the PGCs of strains 58S1T and S23321 as conventional genomic islands (GIs; Fig. 4a, b), we detected a tRNA gene and its partial tandem duplication at the boundaries of the PGC region in both of these strains (Figs 5 and 6b) which may be the hallmark of flexible GIs [42, 43]. Flexible GIs of this type are typically acquired by non-homologous recombination in preferential insertion sites, such as tRNAs, and may leave behind telltale partial direct repeats [44].

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Harr plot analysis of strain 58S1T vs S23321 (panels a and b) and 58S1T vs Bradyrhizobium betae PL7HG1T (panel c). Panel b represents magnification of the region around the photosynthesis gene cluster (PGC) in panel a. Green arrows (panel b) indicate the existence of tRNA genes and their partial tandem duplications adjacent to the PGC. nif, Indicates the position of the nitrogen fixation gene cluster (panels a and c).

It is noteworthy that we also detected a tRNA gene but not its partial repeat in the border region of the PGC of B. betae PL7HG1T and B. amphicarpaeae 39S1MBT [37] (Fig. 5). Collectively these observations suggest that in some species of the genus Bradyrhizobium , the PGC region may act as a mobile genetic element with potential for the horizontal transfer of photosynthesis genes. Comparison of the G+C contents of genomes with PGCs of strains 58S1T, S23321, B. betae PL7HG1T and B. amphicarpaeae 39S1MBT did not reveal significant differences, suggesting that any horizontal transfer of the PGC region may have occurred between closely related bacterial species or alternatively was a distant evolutionary event [45].

Phenotypic characterization

Novel strains 58S1T and S23321 produce colonies that are circular, convex, beige, translucent and <1 mm diameter after 7 days growth on yeast extract–mannitol (YEM) agar medium [6] at 28 °C. Bacterial cells are Gram-stain-negative based on the KOH method of Buck [46]. They produce an alkaline reaction on YEM agar after 21 days growth at 28°C that is typical of the genus Bradyrhizobium . Strains 58S1T and S23321 did not produce pink-pigmented colonies on modified HM agar medium [39] after 7–14 days at 28°C under fluorescent and incandescent or natural daylight (14 h light, 10 h dark) in contrast to photosynthetic reference strains, B oligotrophicum . S58T, B. denitrificans IFAM1005T and Bradyrhizobium sp. BTAi1. Cell morphology was investigated using transmission electron microscopy as described previously [5, 12]. Cells of 58S1T and S23321 [5] are rod-shaped with sub-polar and lateral flagella. Cells of the type strain (Fig. S9) have an average cell size of 0.86×1.64 µm, which is consistent with the characteristics of the genus Bradyrhizobium [47].

Analysis of fatty acids was done using the Sherlock Microbial Identification System (midi) version 6.0 and the rtsba6 database as described previously [12]. Table S3 shows that novel strain 58S1T exhibited a fatty acid profile characteristic of the genus Bradyrhizobium [48] with a predominance of fatty acids C16  :  0 and C18 : 1ω6c/C18 : 1ω7c (summed feature 8).

Multiple phenotypic tests including carbon source utilization and chemical sensitivity assays were carried out using Biolog GEN III MicroPlates according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The results (Table S4) show that strain 58S1T can be differentiated from close relative, B. betae PL7HG1T as well as from type strains of B. cytisi , B. rifense , B. canariense , B. japonicum and B. diazoefficiens on the basis of several of these phenotypic tests.

Plant tests were carried out using modified Leonard jars as described previously [2, 5, 6] with B. diazoefficiens USDA110T and B. oligotrophicum S58T as reference strains. Based on the results of these tests, strains 58S1T and S23321 did not elicit nodules on roots of Macroptilium atropurpureum ‘Siratro’ or Aeschynomene indica. Further tests showed that 58S1T did not elicit nodules on soybean ‘AC Orford’ or Amphicarpaea bracteata. The fact that strain 58S1T was originally isolated from a root nodule of soybean [2] suggests that it may be an opportunist that occasionally occupies root nodules.

Based on the phylogenetic, complete genome sequence and phenotypic data presented here, we propose that strains 58S1T and S23321 represent a novel species named Bradyrhizobium cosmicum sp. nov.

Description of Bradyrhizobium cosmicum sp. nov.

Bradyrhizobium cosmicum (cos'mi.cum. L. neut. adj. cosmicum, of the world, cosmopolitan).

Cells are Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, non-spore-forming rods (approx. 0.86 µm wide and 1.64 µm long) with sub-polar and lateral flagella. Colonies on YEM agar medium are circular, convex, beige, translucent and <1 mm in diameter after 7 days at 28°C. Growth occurs at pH 5–10 (optimum, pH 7.0). Produces an alkaline reaction on YEM agar. The type strain grows at 10°C, optimal at 28°C, but no growth occurs at 37 °C. Does not produce pink-pigmented colonies on modified HM agar medium when exposed to light–dark cycles. The type strain does not grow in the presence of 1 % (w/v) NaCl. Utilizes d-mannose, d-galactose, d-fucose, l-fucose, d-mannitol, d-arabitol, l-pyroglutamic acid, l-galactonic acid lactone, d-gluconic acid, mucic acid, d-saccharic acid, methyl pyruvate, l-lactic acid, α-keto-glutaric acid, d-malic acid, l-malic acid, Tween 40, β-hydroxy-d,l-butyric acid, acetic acid, formic acid and four other carbon sources. Does not utilize d-sorbitol, d-glucose-6-PO4, d-fructose-6-PO4, d-aspartic acid, l-glutamic acid, pectin, quinic acid, citric acid, α-hydroxybutyric acid, acetoacetic acid, propionic acid and 34 other carbon sources. Resistant to 1 % sodium lactate, troleandomycin, lincomycin, nalidixic acid and four other chemical compounds. Susceptible to nalidixic acid, potassium tellurite, aztreonam and six other chemical compounds.

Predominant fatty acids are C16 : 0 and C18 : 1ω6c/C18 : 1ω7c (summed feature 8). Does not elicit root nodules on Glycine max, Macroptilium atropurpureum, Amphicarpaea bracteata or Aeschynomene indica.

The type strain, 58S1T (=LMG 31545T=HAMBI 3725T), was isolated from a root nodule of a soybean plant that was inoculated with root-zone soil of Amphicarpaea bracteata (Hog peanut) growing in Canada. The type strain contains key photosystem and nitrogen-fixation genes but not nodulation or type III secretion system genes. The DNA G+C content of the type strain is 64.3 mol% and the genome size is 7.30 Mbp. GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the complete genome and the 16S rRNA, atpD, glnII, recA, gyrB, rpoB and nifH gene sequences of the type strain are CP041656, KP768789, KP768557, KP768615, KF615104, KP768731, KP768673 and CP041656, respectively.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1

Funding information

Funding by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (grant no. J-002272) and JSPS KAKENHI (grant no.18H02112) is gratefully acknowledged.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Keith Hubbard of the Microscopy Centre, AAFC, Ottawa, Canada for preparing electron microscope images and to Eric Giraud, Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes, Montpellier, France for supplying seed of Aeschynomene indica used in plant tests.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: ANI, average nucleotide identity; GI, genomic island; ML, maximum-likelihood; MLSA, multilocus sequence analysis; PGC, photosynthesis gene cluster; YEM, yeast extract–mannitol.

Four supplementary tables and nine supplementary figures are available with the online version of this article.

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for gene sequences of strains 58S1T and S23321 respectively, are: KP768789 and AP012279 (16S rRNA); KP768557 and AP012279 (atpD); KP768615 and AP012279 (glnII); KF615104 and AP012279 (recA); KP768731 and AP012279 (gyrB); KP768673 and AP012279 (rpoB); and, CP041656 and AP012279 (nifH). The whole genome shotgun projects for strains 58S1T and S23321 were deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers CP041656 and AP012279, respectively. Raw PacBio data for strain 58S1T was deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the BioProject accession number PRJNA554308. Strain 58S1T was deposited in the BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection, Belgium as LMG 31545 and in the HAMBI Microbial Culture Collection, Finland as HAMBI 3725. Strain S23321 was deposited in the Japan Collection of Microorganisms as JCM 18004.

References

  • 1.Avontuur JR, Palmer M, Beukes CW, Chan WY, Coetzee MPA, et al. Genome-informed Bradyrhizobium taxonomy: where to from here? Syst Appl Microbiol. 2019;42:427–439. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2019.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bromfield ESP, Cloutier S, Tambong JT, Tran Thi TV. Soybeans inoculated with root zone soils of Canadian native legumes harbour diverse and novel Bradyrhizobium spp. that possess agricultural potential. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2017;40:440–447. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2017.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rivas R, Willems A, Palomo JL, García-Benavides P, Mateos PF, et al. Bradyrhizobium betae sp. nov., isolated from roots of Beta vulgaris affected by tumour-like deformations. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:1271–1275. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02971-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cloutier S, Bromfield ESP. Analysis of the complete genome sequence of the widely studied strain Bradyrhizobium betae PL7HG1Treveals the presence of photosynthesis genes and a putative plasmid. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019;8:e01282–19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01282-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Okubo T, Tsukui T, Maita H, Okamoto S, Oshima K, et al. Complete genome sequence of Bradyrhizobium sp. S23321: insights into symbiosis evolution in soil oligotrophs. Microbes Environ. 2012;27:306–315. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME11321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tang J, Bromfield ESP, Rodrigue N, Cloutier S, Tambong JT. Microevolution of symbiotic Bradyrhizobium populations associated with soybeans in east North America. Ecol Evol. 2012;2:2943–2961. doi: 10.1002/ece3.404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cole JR, Wang Q, Fish JA, Chai B, McGarrell DM, et al. Ribosomal database project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D633–D642. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Darriba D, Posada D, Kozlov AM, Stamatakis A, Morel B, et al. ModelTest-NG: a new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:291–294. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE. New Orleans, LA: 14 Nov. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Altekar G, Dwarkadas S, Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. Parallel Metropolis coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:407–415. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yu X, Cloutier S, Tambong JT, Bromfield ESP. Bradyrhizobium ottawaense sp. nov., a symbiotic nitrogen fixing bacterium from root nodules of soybeans in Canada. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:3202–3207. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.065540-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.de Lajudie PM, Andrews M, Ardley J, Eardly B, Jumas-Bilak E, et al. Minimal standards for the description of new genera and species of rhizobia and agrobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microb. 1863;iol 2019:1852. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rivas R, Martens M, de Lajudie P, Willems A. Multilocus sequence analysis of the genus Bradyrhizobium . Syst Appl Microbiol. 2009;32:101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parker MA. The spread of Bradyrhizobium lineages across host legume clades: from Abarema to Zygia . Microb Ecol. 2015;69:630–640. doi: 10.1007/s00248-014-0503-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stothard P. The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques. 2000;28:1102–1104. doi: 10.2144/00286ir01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Durán D, Rey L, Mayo J, Zúñiga-Dávila D, Imperial J, et al. Bradyrhizobium paxllaeri sp. nov. and Bradyrhizobium icense sp. nov., nitrogen-fixing rhizobial symbionts of Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) in Peru. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:2072–2078. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.060426-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ardui S, Ameur A, Vermeesch JR, Hestand MS. Single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing comes of age: applications and utilities for medical diagnostics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:2159–2168. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nguyen HDT, Cloutier S, Bromfield ESP. Complete genome sequence of Bradyrhizobium ottawaense OO99T, an efficient nitrogen-fixing symbiont of soybean. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2018;7:e0147718. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01477-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V, et al. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D851–D860. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T, et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D535–D542. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ciufo S, Kannan S, Sharma S, Badretdin A, Clark K, et al. Using average nucleotide identity to improve taxonomic assignments in prokaryotic genomes at the NCBI. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:2386–2392. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.de Lajudie PM, Young JPW. International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Rhizobia and Agrobacteria Minutes of the closed meeting, Granada, 4 September 2017. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:3363–3368. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:461–466. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kerepesi C, Bánky D, Grolmusz V. AmphoraNet: the Webserver implementation of the AMPHORA2 metagenomic workflow suite. Gene. 2014;533:538–540. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wu M, Scott AJ. Phylogenomic analysis of bacterial and archaeal sequences with AMPHORA2. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1033–1034. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Edgar RC. Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. TrimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bromfield ESP, Cloutier S, Nguyen HDT. Description and complete genome sequences of Bradyrhizobium symbiodeficiens sp. nov., a non-symbiotic bacterium associated with legumes native to Canada. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:442–449. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lindström K, Amsalu AA, Mousavi SA. Evolution and taxonomy of nitrogen-fixing organisms with emphasis on rhizobia. In: de Bruijn FJ, editor. Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. pp. 21–38. editor. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ohtsubo Y, Ikeda-Ohtsubo W, Nagata Y, Tsuda M. GenomeMatcher: a graphical user interface for DNA sequence comparison. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:376. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kaneko T, Nakamura Y, Sato S, Minamisawa K, Uchiumi T, et al. Complete genomic sequence of nitrogen-fixing symbiotic bacterium Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110. DNA Res. 2002;9:189–197. doi: 10.1093/dnares/9.6.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bromfield ESP, Cloutier S, Nguyen HDT. Description and complete genome sequence of Bradyrhizobium amphicarpaeae sp. nov., harbouring photosystem and nitrogen-fixation genes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;69:2841–2848. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Larimer FW, Chain P, Hauser L, Lamerdin J, Malfatti S, et al. Complete genome sequence of the metabolically versatile photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris . Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:55–61. doi: 10.1038/nbt923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Okubo T, Fukushima S, Itakura M, Oshima K, Longtonglang A, et al. Genome analysis suggests that the soil oligotrophic bacterium Agromonas oligotrophica (Bradyrhizobium oligotrophicum) is a nitrogen-fixing symbiont of Aeschynomene indica . Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:2542–2551. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00009-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Harr R, Hagblom P, Gustafsson P. Two‐dimensional graphic analysis of DNA sequence homologies. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982;10:365–374. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.1.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP. Simon Fraser University Research Computing Group, Lau BY, et al. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucl Acids Res. 2017;45:W30–W35. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rodriguez-Valera F, Martin-Cuadrado A-B, López-Pérez M. Flexible genomic islands as drivers of genome evolution. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016;31:154–160. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bertelli C, Tilley KE, Brinkman FSL. Microbial genomic island discovery, visualization and analysis. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:1685–1698. doi: 10.1093/bib/bby042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Williams KP. Integration sites for genetic elements in prokaryotic tRNA and tmRNA genes: sublocation preference of integrase subfamilies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:866–875. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.4.866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu Y, Zheng Q, Lin W, Jiao N. Characteristics and evolutionary analysis of photosynthetic gene clusters on extrachromosomal replicons: from streamlined plasmids to chromids. mSystems. 2019;4:358–370. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00358-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Buck JD. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;44:992–993. doi: 10.1128/AEM.44.4.992-993.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T, Krieg NR. Family VII. Bradyrhizobiaceae fam. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM, editors. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2nd ed. vol. 2. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 438. p. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tighe SW, de Lajudie P, Dipietro K, Lindström K, Nick G, et al. Analysis of cellular fatty acids and phenotypic relationships of Agrobacterium, Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium species using the Sherlock microbial identification system. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:787–801. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-2-787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kaneko T, Maita H, Hirakawa H, Uchiike N, Minamisawa K, et al. Complete genome sequence of the soybean symbiont Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain USDA6T. Genes. 2011;2:763–787. doi: 10.3390/genes2040763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES