Skip to main content
Cancer Science logoLink to Cancer Science
. 2013 Jan 30;104(3):375–382. doi: 10.1111/cas.12088

Secretory clusterin contributes to oxaliplatin resistance by activating Akt pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma

Peng Xiu 1, Xuesong Dong 2, Xiaofeng Dong 1, Zongzhen Xu 1, Huaqiang Zhu 4, Feng Liu 1, Zheng Wei 2, Bo Zhai 2, Jagat R Kanwar 5, Hongchi Jiang 2, Jie Li 1,, Xueying Sun 2,3,
PMCID: PMC7657244  PMID: 23279642

Abstract

Secretory clusterin (sCLU) is expressed in numerous cancers and is associated with the resistance to chemotherapy. However, the role of sCLU in the resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to oxaliplatin (OXA), a recently used third‐generation platinum agent, remains unclear. The stable transfectants that are depleted of or overexpress sCLU and OXA‐resistant cells were generated using human HCC cells. Overexpression of sCLU abrogated OXA‐induced inhibition of cell growth and cell apoptosis, but depletion of sCLU synergized with OXA to inhibit cell growth and enhance cell apoptosis, by regulating proteins involved in mitochondrial apoptosis pathways, such as Bcl‐2, Bax, Bcl‐xL and caspase‐9, and affecting phosphorylation of Akt and GSK‐3β. Overexpression of sCLU in either OXA‐resistant cells or stable transfectants that overexpress sCLU significantly increased phosphorylated Akt. However, specific inhibition of Akt enhanced sensitivity of sCLU‐overexpressing cells to OXA, but had no effect on sCLU expression, suggesting that the regulatory effects between sCLU and pAkt may be in a one‐way manner in HCC cells. The expression levels of sCLU affected the therapeutic efficacy of OXA to treat HCC tumors established in immunodeficiency mice. The results have demonstrated that sCLU contributes to OXA resistance by activating Akt pathway, indicating that sCLU may be a novel molecular target for overcoming OXA resistance in HCC.


Liver cancer is the second most frequent cause of cancer death in men worldwide, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 70–85% of all liver cancers.1 However, HCC is extremely resistant to current chemotherapeutic drugs. Sorafenib is currently the most effective drug for HCC,2 but it prolongs survival for only 2–3 months, and has not been widely adopted because it is cost‐prohibitive in Asia and sub‐Saharan Africa, which have the highest incidence of HCC.1 Therefore, novel drugs and therapeutic strategies for HCC continue to be sought.

Oxaliplatin (OXA) is a third‐generation platinum‐derived chemotherapeutic agent that triggers cell death by inducing platinum‐DNA adducts, and appears to block DNA replication more effectively than other platinum compounds.3 OXA has been used to treat colorectal4, 5 and gastric6 cancers, and has also displayed anti‐tumor activity against HCC.7 The combination of OXA and gemcitabine or bevacizumab has been investigated to treat advanced HCC in clinical trials,8, 9 but the results achieved were not comparable with the success obtained with colorectal cancer.5 Furthermore, little data is available regarding the signaling pathways activated by OXA in HCC. Therefore, it remains a priority to find effective methods to enhance the sensitivity of HCC to OXA.

Clusterin (CLU) was initially discovered as a secretory glycoprotein with cell‐aggregating activity in vitro,10 and is overexpressed in numerous advanced‐stage and metastatic human cancers.11 Overexpression of CLU has been observed in a majority of HCC cases,12, 13 and metastatic HCC tissues have been found to have a higher level of CLU expression compared with primary HCC tissues of the same patient.14 It is noteworthy that only the secretory clusterin form (sCLU), but not the nuclear form (nCLU), is expressed in aggressive late stage tumors.15 sCLU has been used as a biomarker for pancreatic,16 breast,17 colorectal,18 ovarian,19 cervical,20 gastric,21 bladder,22 esophageal23 and lung24 cancers, as well as for HCC.25, 26 Most significantly, sCLU expression is associated with broad‐based resistance to chemotherapeutic agents such as doxorubicin, cisplatin, etoposide and camphothecin.18 Downregulation of sCLU by antisense oligonucleotides enhances the activity of heat shock protein 90 inhibitor,27 or docetaxel or mitoxantrone,28 to treat drug‐resistant prostate cancer, and the efficacy of gemcitabine, cisplatin or carboplatin to treat non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).29 These data indicate that sCLU may contribute to the resistance of HCC to OXA. Therefore, we designed the present study aiming to investigate this hypothesis and the underlying molecular pathways.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and culture

Human HCC cell lines, HepG2, Bel7402 and Bel7404 (the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Maryland, USA) and SMMC7721 and SNU739, and cervical cancer Hela cells (the Type Culture Collection Cell Bank, Chinese Academy of Sciences Committee, Shanghai, China) were used in this study. HepG2, SNU739 and Hela cells were cultured in DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China), while Bel7402, Bel7404 and SMMC7721 cells in RPMI 1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific), supplemented with 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin and 10% FBS.

Antibodies and reagents

Antibodies used in this study included antibodies against clusterin, caspase‐9 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, California, USA), and antibodies against Bcl‐2, Bax, Bcl‐xL, Akt, phosphorylated Akt (pAkt), glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)‐3β, phosphorylated GSK (pGSK)‐3β and GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA). The Akt inhibitor V, triciribine (TCN), was purchased from Merk KGaA (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany), and OXA from Sanofi China (Shanghai, China).

Expression vectors and transfection

Four pMAGic7.1‐based shRNA vectors (CLU1, CLU2, CLU3 and CLU4), a scrambled (Sc) shRNA vector (Table 1) and a full‐length human CLU cDNA (GenBank accession NM_203339) were provided by Shanghai Sunbio Medical Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). The sCLU fragment was amplified by PCR with a pair of primers (5′‐GGACTCAGATCTCGAGGCCACCATGATGAAGACTCTGCTGCTG‐3′ and 5′‐GGCGACCGGTGGATCCCGCTCCTCCCGGTGCTTTTT‐3′), and inserted into the pIRES2‐EGFP vector (TaKaRa Biomedical Technology, Beijing, China), which was termed pIRES2‐EGFP/sCLU. Transfection of cells was performed using GenJet DNA in vitro transfection reagent (SignaGen, Rockville, Maryland, USA).

Table 1.

Sequences of oligonucleotides used as CLU RNAi primers

Construct Position Sequence Target sequence
CLU1 Upstream

5′‐CCGGGCTCCAGGAAATGTCCAATttcaagaga

ATTGGACATTTCCTGGAGC TTTTTTg‐3′

GCTCCAGGAAATGTCCAAT
Downstream 5′‐AATTCAAAAAAGCTCCAGGAAATGTCCAAT tctcttgaa ATTGGACATTTCCTGGAGC‐3′
CLU2 Upstream 5′‐CCGGGGTTGACCAGGAAATACAAttcaagaga TTGTATTTCCTGGTCAACC TTTTTTg‐3′ GGTTGACCAGGAAATACAA
Downstream 5′‐AATTCAAAAAAGGTTGACCAGGAAATACAA tctcttgaaTTGTATTTCCTGGTCAACC‐3′
CLU3 Upstream 5′‐CCGGGGGATATGATGACAAGGTTctcaagaga AACCTTGTCATCATATCCC TTTTTTg‐3′ GGGATATGATGACAAGGTT
Downstream 5′‐ AATTCAAAAAAGGGATATGATGACAAGGTT tctcttgag AACCTTGTCATCATATCCC‐3′
CLU4 Upstream 5′‐CCGGCAGGGAAGTAAGTACGTCAATctcgag ATTGACGTACTTACTTCCCTG TTTTTTg‐3′ CAGGGAAGTAAGTACGTCAAT
Downstream 5′‐AATTCAAAAAACAGGGAAGTAAGTACGTCAAT ctcgag ATTGACGTACTTACTTCCCTG‐3′
Scramble Upstream 5′‐CCGGTTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGTttcaagaga TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT TTTTTTg‐3′ TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT
Downstream 5′‐AATTCAAAAAATTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT tctcttgaaTTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT‐3′

CLU, clusterin.

Establishment of stable transfectants

Cells were seeded in 10‐cm plastic dishes and grown to approximately 67% confluence when Bel7404 cells were transfected with 4 μg of pIRES2‐EGFP/sCLU or pIRES2‐EGFP vectors, and Bel7402 and SMMC7721 cells with 4 μg of shRNA vectors. Cells were detached with trypsin after transfection for 48 h, and seeded in selection medium containing 400 μg/mL of geneticin (for pIRES2‐EGFP vectors) or 3 μg/mL of puromycin (for shRNA vectors). Stable transfectants were selected 4 weeks later. Bel7404 cells stably transfected with pIRES2‐EGFP/sCLU or pIRES2‐EGFP vector were termed Bel7404‐sCLUhigh or Bel7404‐vec. Bel7402 or SMMC7721 cells stably transfected with CLU4 or Sc shRNA vectors were termed Bel7402‐sCLUlow, Bel7402‐vec, SMMC7721‐sCLUlow or SMMC7721‐vec, respectively.

Quantitative real‐time PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from cells, and cDNA was synthesized using a cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China) with a pair of primers (5′‐ATGATGAAGACTCTGCTGCTGTT‐3′ and 5′‐TTCCTGGAGCTCATTGTCTG‐3′). The reaction mixtures for quantitative real‐time PCR were prepared (Shanghai Sunbio Medical Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) and analyzed using MX3000P Real‐time PCR systems (Stratagen, Wilmington, DE, USA). Experiments were performed in triplicate, and the data were calculated using ∆∆C t methods.

Cell viability and apoptosis assays

The methods have been described previously.30, 31, 32

Immunoblotting

Protein concentrations in cell lysates were determined (Bio‐Rad, Richmond, California, USA). Lysates were resolved on SDS‐PAGE gels, transferred to PVDF membranes, and immunoblotted as previously described.30, 31, 32 The density of each band was measured using a densitometric analysis program (FR200, Shanghai, China). The relative level of each protein was normalized with respect to GAPDH band density. In preliminary experiments, serial dilutions of lysates (containing 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40 or 80 μg protein) were immunoblotted, band intensities were measured and plotted against protein amounts to generate a standard curve, and the amount of protein for each immunoblot was determined.

Establishment of oxaliplatin‐resistant cells

The OXA‐resistant cells, termed Bel7404‐OR, were established by incubating Bel7404 cells with OXA with gradient increment of concentrations from 1 to 60 μM. Briefly, cells were cultured in medium containing 1 μM of OXA for 1 week, and then 2 μM of OXA for 1 week, followed by 4 μM of OXA for 1 week until 60 μM was reached. The cells that were able to survive in the medium containing 60 μM of OXA were considered OXA‐resistant cells.

Animal experiments

All surgical procedures and care administered to the animals were in accordance with institutional guidelines. Six‐week‐old male athymic BALB/c nu/nu mice were purchased from the Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Science, China. The experimental protocol has been described previously.30, 31, 32 Briefly, 1 × 106 of cells were subcutaneously injected into the back of the mice. Tumor volumes were estimated: π/6 × a 2 × b, where a is the short axis and b the long axis. Two weeks later, the mice were assigned to respective groups receiving weekly intraperitoneal injection of 200 μL of either PBS or OXA at a dose of 10 mg/kg. Mice were killed on day 42.

Statistical analysis

The data are expressed as mean values ± SD. Comparisons were made using a one‐way anova followed by Dunnett's test with spss software (version 17.0, SPSS China, Shanghai, China). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Expression of secretory clusterin in hepatocellular carcinoma cells

The expression of pre‐sCLU and sCLU was examined in human HCC cells. Hela cells served as a positive control.33 HCC cells expressed different levels of sCLU in the following order (from high to low): Bel7402, SMMC7721, HepG2, SNU739 and Bel7404 (Fig. 1A,B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Expression of secretory clusterin (sCLU) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. Lysates (A, B) from Hela, Bel7402, SMMC7721, HepG2, SNU739 and Bel7404 cells, or (C, D) from parental Bel7404 cells (control), or Bel7404 cells stably transfected with pIRES2‐EGFP vector (Bel7404‐vec) or pIRES2‐EGFP/sCLU (Bel7404‐sCLU high), or (E, F) from parental Bel7402 cells (control), or Bel7402 cells transfected with scrambled (Sc) or clusterin (CLU) 1, CLU2, CLU3 and CLU4 shRNA vectors were immunoblotted. (B, D, F) The density of each band in (A, C, E) was measured and normalized to that of GAPDH, respectively. (G) The expression of sCLU mRNA in the above cells in (E) was analyzed by quantitative real‐time PCR, and normalized to that of β‐actin. A significant (P < 0.05) difference from the respective control is denoted by “*,” and a highly significant (P < 0.001) difference by “**.”

Overexpression of secretory clusterin in hepatocellular carcinoma cells

The stable transfectants, Bel7404‐sCLUhigh, expressed distinctly higher levels of sCLU than parental Bel7404 cells, while the levels of sCLU in control stable transfectants, Bel7404‐vec, remained unchanged (Fig. 1C,D).

Silencing secretory clusterin in hepatocellular carcinoma cells

Transfection of CLU1, CLU2, CLU3 and CLU4 resulted in reductions of sCLU protein expression in Bel7402 cells by 14.6%, 47.4%, 22.0% and 73.3%, respectively, compared with Sc controls (Fig. 1E,F). Similarly, quantitative real‐time PCR analysis showed that CLU1, CLU2, CLU3 or CLU4‐transfected Bel7402 cells had notable reductions in sCLU mRNA expression, by 42.1%, 51.7%, 46.7% and 55.4%, respectively, compared with Sc controls (Fig. 1G). Among the four shRNA vectors, CLU4 displayed the strongest gene‐silencing ability, and was used in the following experiments. The gene‐silencing efficiency of the shRNA vectors were also evaluated in SMMC7721 and HepG2 cells (data not shown).

Secretory clusterin affects chemosensitivity to oxaliplatin

Bel7402‐sCLUlow, SMMC7721‐sCLUlow and Bel7404‐sCLUhigh cells had similar proliferation rates, compared with the respective parental cells, or Sc shRNA or empty vector‐transfected controls (Fig. 2A–C). The above cells were incubated in the absence or the presence of OXA (16 μM) for 48 h, and cell viability was measured. OXA alone significantly reduced the viability of Bel‐7402, SMMC7721 and Bel7404 cells (Fig. 2D–F). Depletion of sCLU significantly reduced, while overexpression of sCLU significantly increased, the viability of cells treated with OXA (Fig. 2D–F). Bel7402‐sCLUlow and SMMC7721‐sCLUlow cells had a significant reduction in IC50 of OXA by 68.9% and 67.9%, compared to their respective parental cells (Table 2). However, Bel7404‐sCLUhigh cells had a significantly higher IC50 of OXA, by approximately threefold, compared with parental Bel7404 cells (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Secretory clusterin (sCLU) affects chemosensitivity to oxaliplatin (OXA). (A–C) Parental Bel7402, SMMC7721 or Bel7404 cells, or the cells stably transfected with scrambled (Sc) (Bel7402‐vec or SMMC7721‐vec) or clusterin (CLU) 4 shRNA vector (Bel7402‐sCLU low or SMMC7721‐sCLU low), or empty vector or sCLU expression vector (Bel7404‐vec or Bel7404‐sCLU high) were cultured for 7 days, and the viability was measured at indicated time points. (D–F) The above cells cultured in the presence or absence of OXA (16 μM) for 48 h, and the viability was measured. A significant (P < 0.05) difference from respective untreated parental cells is denoted by “*.” A significant (P < 0.05) reduction from OXA‐treated parental cells is denoted by “‡” and a significant (P < 0.05) increase by “†.”

Table 2.

Effect of sCLU on IC 50 to oxaliplatin in HCC cells

Cells Relative sCLU IC50 (μM) 95% confidence interval (μM)
SMMC7721 0.77 40.159 0.211–3.156
SMMC7721‐sCLUlow 0.17 12.891 0.519–2.934
Bel7402 1.08 54.349 0.028–3.677
Bel7402‐sCLUlow 0.25 16.888 0.398–3.016
Bel7404 0.27 22.043 0.325–3.019
Bel7404‐sCLUhigh 1.56 69.053 0.327–3.118

Cells were incubated with various concentrations of oxaliplatin for 48 h, and the cell viability was determined using a CCK‐8 kit. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; sCLU, secretory clusterin.

Oxaliplatin and depletion of sCLU induced apoptosis of Bel7402 cells at rates of 9.2% and 4.7%, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of untreated Bel7402 cells (0.6%); and Bel7402‐sCLUlow cells treated with OXA had an even higher apoptosis rate (20.0%; Fig. 3A,B). Similar results were obtained with SMMC7221 cells. The untreated Bel7404‐sCLUhigh cells had almost the same apoptosis rate as parental Bel7404 cells. OXA treatment increased apoptosis of parental Bel7404 cells, with a rate of 31.5%, which was significantly higher than that of Bel7404‐sCLUhigh cells treated with OXA (10.5%; Fig. 3A,B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cell apoptosis. (A) Representative dot plots were from cytometrically‐analyzed parental Bel7402, SMMC7721 or Bel7404 cells (control), and their stable transfectants depleted of secretory clusterin (sCLU) by clusterin (CLU) 4, or overexpressing sCLU (sCLU high), which were incubated in the absence or the presence of OXA (16 μM) for 24 h, and cell apoptosis rates (%) were measured (B). A significant (P < 0.05) difference from respective control is denoted by “*,” and a highly significant (P < 0.001) difference by “**.” A significant (P < 0.05) increase from respective OXA‐treated parental cells is denoted by “†,” and a significant (P < 0.05) reduction by “‡.”

Secretory clusterin affects cell mitochondrial apoptosis pathways

Bel7402‐sCLUlow and SMMC7721‐sCLUlow cells were cultured in the absence or the presence of OXA (16 μM) for 24 h. Both OXA and sCLU knockdown upregulated Bax and downregulated Bcl‐2, thus reducing the Bcl‐2/Bax ratio; and the combination of OXA and sCLU knockdown further decreased the Bcl‐2/Bax ratio (Fig. 4A,B). Overexpression of sCLU alone had almost no effect on the expression of Bcl‐2 and Bax, but OXA significantly reduced the Bcl‐2/Bax ratio; the combination of OXA and sCLU overexpression significantly increased the Bcl‐2/Bax ratio, compared with OXA alone (Fig. 4A,B). In addition, OXA alone significantly downregulated Bcl‐xL expression and increased caspase‐9 activation, and the combination of sCLU depletion and OXA further downregulated Bcl‐xL expression and increased caspase‐9 activation in Bel7402 cells (Fig. 4C,D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. (A) Parental Bel7402, SMMC7721 or Bel7404 cells, and their stable transfectants depleted of secretory clusterin (sCLU) by clusterin (CLU) 4, or overexpressing sCLU, were incubated in the absence or presence of oxaliplatin (OXA) (16 μM) for 24 h, and immunoblotted. (B) Each band density in (A) was measured and normalized to that of GAPDH, respectively. (C) Parental Bel7402 cells (control) and their stable transfectants transfected with scrambled (Sc) or CLU4 shRNA vectors were incubated in the presence or absence of OXA (16 μM) for 24 h, and immunoblotted. (D) Each band density in (C) was measured and normalized to that of GAPDH. “*” indicates a significant (P < 0.05) difference from the control, and “**,” a highly significant (P < 0.001) difference. A significant (P < 0.05) increase from OXA‐treated parental cells is denoted by “†,” and a significant (P < 0.05) reduction by “‡.”

Secretory clusterin and phosphorylation of Akt

To further investigate whether sCLU participates in OXA resistance, we established OXA‐resistant Bel7404 cell lines (Bel7404‐OR). Both Bel7404‐OR and Bel7404‐sCLUhigh cells had higher levels of sCLU than their parental cells (Fig. 5A,B). pAkt has been considered to be a cancer multidrug resistance locus34; thus, its expression was detected. Both Bel7404‐OR and Bel7404‐sCLUhigh cells had higher levels of pAkt, while they had similar levels of Akt, compared with their parentals (Fig. 5A,B). The data drove us to detect expression of pAkt in the HCC cells in Figure 1(A), but a correlation between endogenous expression of sCLU and Akt was not observed (data not shown). Furthermore, specific inhibition of pAkt by TCN downregulated pAkt but had no effect on sCLU expression in Bel7404‐OR cells (Fig. 5C,D). In addition, TCN was highly efficient in suppressing Akt phosphorylation in a dose‐dependent manner, but did not affect sCLU expression in Bel7402 cells (Fig. 5E,F). TCN was originally dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 10 mg/mL; thus, medium containing DMSO also served as a control.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Akt phosphorylation. (A, B) Parental Bel7404, Bel7404‐OR or Bel7404‐sCLU high cells were cultured for 24 h. (C, D) Bel7404‐OR cells were cultured in medium, or media containing DMSO or 3 μM of triciribine (TCN), for 4 h. (E, F) Bel7402 cells were cultured in medium, or media containing DMSO or 1 and 3 μM of TCN for 4 h. (G, H) Parental Bel7402 cells or their stable transfectants depleted of secretory clusterin (sCLU) by clusterin (CLU) 4 were cultured in medium in the absence or presence of 16 μM of oxaliplatin (OXA) for 24 h. The above cells were immunoblotted (A, C, E, G), and each band density was measured and normalized to that of GAPDH (B, D, F, H), respectively. “*” indicates a significant (P < 0.05) difference.

However, both depletion of sCLU and OXA treatment reduced Akt phosphorylation, and the level of pAkt was further reduced in Bel7402‐sCLUlow cells treated with OXA (Fig. 5G,H). In addition, both depletion of sCLU and OXA reduced phosphorylation of GSK‐3β, a downstream factor of Akt (Fig. 5G,H).

Secretory clusterin inhibits cell apoptosis induced by Akt inhibition

Akt inhibitors have been shown to induce cell apoptosis.35 Here, we further confirmed that TCN highly significantly reduced the level of pAkt (Fig. 6A,B), and increased the apoptosis rates of both parental Bel7404 and Bel7404‐sCLUhigh cells (Fig. 6C). Overexpression of sCLU itself had almost no effect on apoptosis rates but increased Akt phosphorylation and suppressed TCN‐induced inhibition of Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 6A,B), and inhibited the increased apoptosis of Bel7404 cells induced by TCN (Fig. 6C). The data drove us to investigate whether TCN could increase the sensitivity of sCLU‐overexpressing HCC cells to OXA. As shown in Figure 6(D), OXA had only a non‐significant effect on, but TCN highly significant reduced, the viability of Bel7404‐sCLUhigh cells. The combination of TCN and OXA resulted in even lower viability of the cells, compared with TCN alone.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Akt inhibition counteracts secretory clusterin (sCLU) overexpression on cell apoptosis and overcomes resistance to oxaliplatin (OXA). Parental Bel7404 or Bel7404‐sCLU high cells were cultured in medium in the absence or presence of TCN (3 μM) for 4 h. (A) The expression of Akt/pAkt was detected. (B) Each band density in (A) was measured and normalized to that of GAPDH. (C) The apoptosis rates (%) were measured. (D) Bel7404‐sCLU high cells were incubated with OXA (16 μM), triciribine (TCN) (3 μM), or the combination for 8 h, and cell viability was measured. Untreated parental Bel7404 cells served as controls. “**” indicates a highly significant (P < 0.001) difference. A significant (P < 0.05) increase from untreated parental Bel7404 cells is denoted by “†,” and a significant (P < 0.05) reduction by “‡.”

Secretory clusterin affects the efficacy of oxaliplatin to inhibit tumors

To investigate the influence of sCLU on the efficacy of OXA to inhibit tumor growth in vivo, we designed two sets of experiments using parental Bel7402 and Bel7402‐sCLUlow cells, and parental Bel7404 and Bel7404‐sCLUhigh cells. As shown in Figure 7(A), OXA had an obvious antitumor effect by reducing tumor growth by 45.1% compared to PBS in parental Bel7402 tumors on day 42. There was no significant difference in parental Bel7402 and Bel7402‐sCLUlow tumors treated with PBS, but Bel7402‐sCLUlow tumors treated with OXA grew significantly slower than OXA‐treated parental Bel7402 tumors (Fig. 7A). In contrast, OXA demonstrated even stronger anti‐tumor activity in parental Bel7404 tumors by reducing tumor growth by 61.6% compared with that in PBS‐treated parental Bel7404 tumors (Fig. 7B). There was no significant difference in Bel7404 tumors and Bel7404‐sCLUhigh tumors treated with PBS, but Bel7404‐sCLUhigh tumors treated with OXA grew significantly faster than OXA‐treated parental Bel7404 tumors (Fig. 7B). These results indicate that the expression levels of sCLU may determine the efficacy of OXA in treating HCC tumors.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The status of secretory clusterin (sCLU) affects sensitivity to oxaliplatin (OXA) in vivo. (A) Parental Bel7402 or Bel7402‐sCLU low cells, or (B) parental Bel7404 or Bel7404‐sCLU high cells, were implanted into groups of mice. Two weeks later, the mice received weekly injection of either OXA or PBS. “n” indicates the number of mice in each group. A significant (P < 0.05) difference from parental tumors treated with PBS is denoted by “*,” and a highly significant (P < 0.001) difference by “**.” A significant (P < 0.05) reduction from parental tumors treated with OXA is denoted by “‡,” and a significant (P < 0.05) increase by “†.”

Discussion

Secretory clusterin has exhibited inhibitory activities against many therapeutic approaches, such as ionizing radiation,36 and cytotoxic chemotherapy.37 However, it remains unknown whether sCLU participates in the resistance of HCC to OXA. The present study has for the first time demonstrated that sCLU contributes to OXA resistance by activating Akt pathways in HCC. OXA‐resistant cells displayed increased sCLU expression accompanied by increased phosphorylation of Akt. Overexpression of sCLU abrogated the inhibition of cell growth and the induction of cell apoptosis by OXA, and depletion of sCLU synergized with OXA to inhibit cell growth and enhance cell apoptosis. The status of sCLU influenced the efficacy of OXA in treating HCC tumors in vivo. sCLU regulated expression of proteins in mitochondrial apoptosis pathways, such as Bcl‐2, Bax, Bcl‐xL and caspase‐9, and phosphorylation of Akt and GSK‐3β. In accordance, it has been reported that CLU inhibits apoptosis by interfering Bax.38 Although not investigated herein, sCLU may also regulate death receptor‐mediated apoptosis pathways, as sCLU stimulates secretion of TNF‐α through activation of PI3K/Akt pathway.39 The results indicate that sCLU contributes to OXA resistance by activating Akt pathway, and sCLU may be a novel molecular target for overcoming OXA resistance in HCC.

The present study has identified a previously unrecognized pathway linking sCLU overexpression to Akt phosphorylation induced by OXA‐resistance, and the subsequent molecular signaling pathway of cell apoptosis. Interestingly, a correlation between endogenous expression of sCLU and pAkt was not observed in untreated HCC cells, and the regulation between sCLU and pAkt is in a one‐way manner. Thus, overexpression of sCLU by OXA treatment or exogenous gene transfection increased, while depletion of sCLU by shRNA inhibited phosphorylation of Akt, but specific inhibition of Akt did not affect the expression of sCLU in HCC cells. The effect of sCLU on pAkt pathway is also supported by its regulatory effects on pGSK‐3β and Bcl‐2 family members, the downstream factors of pAkt. It has been reported that high activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway is implicated in HCC carcinogenesis,40 and targeting pAkt converts the positive feedback loops into negative ones, leading to the disappearance of multidrug resistance.34 In accordance, sCLU activates PI3K/Akt pathways to induce matrix metalloproteinase‐9 expression,41 and inhibition of GSK‐3 promotes apoptosis of human HCC cells.42

As a third‐generation platinum‐derived compound, OXA has displayed stronger anti‐cancer activities than other platinum drugs. Its main mechanism is to trigger cell death by forming adducts with DNA and block DNA replication.3 The present study has also demonstrated that OXA induced apoptosis of HCC cells by upregulating expression of Bax, downregulating Bcl‐2 and Bcl‐xL, and leading activation of caspase‐9, in accordance with a report by El Fajoui et al.43

Downregulation of sCLU by siRNA or antisense oligonucleotides resensitizes resistant prostate cancer cells to docetaxel,44, 45 and overexpression of sCLU in prostate cancer cells renders them resistant to paclitaxel.46, 47 Custirsen (OGX‐011), an antisense oligonucleotide drug, has been applied to treat prostate cancer and NSCLC in clinical trials.27, 28, 29 The present results warrant future investigation by using this drug, particularly in combination with OXA, to treat HCC.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (81172331, 30972890, 30973474 and 81272467) and the Shandong Provincial Science & Technology Development Program, China (2007GG20002021).

(Cancer Sci, doi: 10.1111/cas.12088, 2013)

References

  • 1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011; 53: 1020–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Raymond E, Faivre S, Chaney S, Woynarowski J, Cvitkovic E. Cellular and molecular pharmacology of oxaliplatin. Mol Cancer Ther 2002; 1: 227–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kato T, Nagata N, Fujii M et al Multi‐center phase II study of FLOX for advanced colorectal cancer patients in Japan: SWIFT 3 study. Anticancer Res 2011; 31: 4657–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sanoff HK, Carpenter WR, Martin CF et al Comparative effectiveness of oxaliplatin vs non‐oxaliplatin‐containing adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012; 104: 211–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pera M, Gallego R, Montagut C et al Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin, cisplatin, and 5‐FU in locally advanced esophageal and gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 2012; 23: 664–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Wang Z, Zhou J, Fan J et al Oxaliplatin induces apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells and inhibits tumor growth. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2009; 18: 1595–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Taieb J, Bonyhay L, Golli L et al Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using two different schedules. Cancer 2003; 98: 2664–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zhu AX, Blaszkowsky LS, Ryan DP et al Phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 1898–903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Blaschuk O, Burdzy K, Fritz IB. Purification and characterization of a cell‐aggregating factor (clusterin), the major glycoprotein in ram rete testis fluid. J Biol Chem 1983; 258: 7714–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Djeu JY, Wei S. Clusterin and chemoresistance. Adv Cancer Res 2009; 105: 77–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Aigelsreiter A, Janig E, Sostaric J et al Clusterin expression in cholestasis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver fibrosis. Histopathology 2009; 54: 561–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kang YK, Hong SW, Lee H, Kim WH. Overexpression of clusterin in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2004; 35: 1340–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lau SH, Sham JS, Xie D et al Clusterin plays an important role in hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis. Oncogene 2006; 25: 1242–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Mukherji D, Eichholz A, De Bono JS. Management of metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer: recent advances. Drugs 2012; 72: 1011–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Jin J, Kim JM, Hur YS et al Clinical significance of clusterin expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 2012; 10: 146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Zhang D, Sun B, Zhao X et al Secreted CLU is associated with the initiation of triple‐negative breast cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 2012; 13: 321–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Rodriguez‐Pineiro AM, Garcia‐Lorenzo A, Blanco‐Prieto S et al Secreted clusterin in colon tumor cell models and its potential as diagnostic marker for colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest 2012; 30: 72–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hassan MK, Watari H, Han Y et al Clusterin is a potential molecular predictor for ovarian cancer patient's survival: targeting clusterin improves response to paclitaxel. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2011; 30: 113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lokamani I, Looi ML, Ali SA, Dali AZ, Jamal R. Clusterin as a potential marker in distinguishing cervical neoplasia. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2011; 33: 223–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Bi J, Guo AL, Lai YR et al Overexpression of clusterin correlates with tumor progression, metastasis in gastric cancer: a study on tissue microarrays. Neoplasma 2010; 57: 191–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hazzaa SM, Elashry OM, Afifi IK. Clusterin as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Pathol Oncol Res 2010; 16: 101–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. He LR, Liu MZ, Li BK et al Clusterin as a predictor for chemoradiotherapy sensitivity and patient survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci 2009; 100: 2354–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Li H, Liu S, Zhu X, Yang S, Xiang J, Chen H. Clusterin immunoexpression and its clinical significance in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer. Lung 2010; 188: 423–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wang Y, Liu YH, Mai SJ et al Evaluation of serum clusterin as a surveillance tool for human hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis B virus related cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25: 1123–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Nafee AM, Pasha HF, Abd El Aal SM, Mostafa NA. Clinical significance of serum clusterin as a biomarker for evaluating diagnosis and metastasis potential of viral‐related hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Biochem 2012; 45: 1070–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Lamoureux F, Thomas C, Yin MJ et al Clusterin inhibition using OGX‐011 synergistically enhances Hsp90 inhibitor activity by suppressing the heat shock response in castrate‐resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res 2011; 71: 5838–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Saad F, Hotte S, North S et al Randomized phase II trial of Custirsen (OGX‐011) in combination with docetaxel or mitoxantrone as second‐line therapy in patients with metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer progressing after first‐line docetaxel: CUOG trial P‐06c. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17: 5765–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Laskin JJ, Nicholas G, Lee C et al Phase I/II trial of custirsen (OGX‐011), an inhibitor of clusterin, in combination with a gemcitabine and platinum regimen in patients with previously untreated advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7: 579–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Li J, Tan H, Dong X et al Antisense integrin alphaV and beta3 gene therapy suppresses subcutaneously implanted hepatocellular carcinomas. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 557–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. He C, Sun XP, Qiao H et al Downregulating hypoxia‐inducible factor‐2α improves the efficacy of doxorubicin to treat hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Sci 2012; 103: 528–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Wang J, Ma Y, Jiang H et al Overexpression of von Hippel‐Lindau protein synergizes with doxorubicin to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma in mice. J Hepatol 2011; 55: 359–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Zhang F, Suarez G, Sha J, Sierra JC, Peterson JW, Chopra AK. Phospholipase A2‐activating protein (PLAA) enhances cisplatin‐induced apoptosis in HeLa cells. Cell Signal 2009; 21: 1085–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Radisavljevic Z. AKT as locus of cancer multidrug resistance and fragility. J Cell Physiol 2013; 228: 671–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lee KB, Jeon JH, Choi I, Kwon OY, Yu K, You KH. Clusterin, a novel modulator of TGF‐beta signaling, is involved in Smad2/3 stability. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008; 366: 905–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Leskov KS, Araki S, Lavik JP et al CRM1 protein‐mediated regulation of nuclear clusterin (nCLU), an ionizing radiation‐stimulated, Bax‐dependent pro‐death factor. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 40083–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Goetz EM, Shankar B, Zou Y et al ATM‐dependent IGF‐1 induction regulates secretory clusterin expression after DNA damage and in genetic instability. Oncogene 2011; 30: 3745–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zhang H, Kim JK, Edwards CA, Xu Z, Taichman R, Wang CY. Clusterin inhibits apoptosis by interacting with activated Bax. Nat Cell Biol 2005; 7: 909–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Shim YJ, Kang BH, Choi BK, Park IS, Min BH. Clusterin induces the secretion of TNF‐alpha and the chemotactic migration of macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012; 422: 200–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Zhou Q, Lui VW, Yeo W. Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Future Oncol 2011; 7: 1149–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Shim YJ, Kang BH, Jeon HS et al Clusterin induces matrix metalloproteinase‐9 expression via ERK1/2 and PI3K/Akt/NF‐κB pathways in monocytes/macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 2011; 90: 761–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Beurel E, Blivet‐Van Eggelpoel MJ, Kornprobst M et al Glycogen synthase kinase‐3 inhibitors augment TRAIL‐induced apoptotic death in human hepatoma cells. Biochem Pharmacol 2009; 77: 54–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. El Fajoui Z, Toscano F, Jacquemin G et al Oxaliplatin sensitizes human colon cancer cells to TRAIL through JNK‐dependent phosphorylation of Bcl‐xL. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 663–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Patterson SG, Wei S, Chen X et al Novel role of Stat1 in the development of docetaxel resistance in prostate tumor cells. Oncogene 2006; 25: 6113–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sowery RD, Hadaschik BA, So AI et al Clusterin knockdown using the antisense oligonucleotide OGX‐011 re‐sensitizes docetaxel‐refractory prostate cancer PC‐3 cells to chemotherapy. BJU Int 2008; 102: 389–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Miyake H, Nelson C, Rennie PS, Gleave ME. Acquisition of chemoresistant phenotype by overexpression of the antiapoptotic gene testosterone‐repressed prostate message‐2 in prostate cancer xenograft models. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 2547–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Zellweger T, Chi K, Miyake H et al Enhanced radiation sensitivity in prostate cancer by inhibition of the cell survival protein clusterin. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 3276–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES