Skip to main content
Virology Journal logoLink to Virology Journal
. 2020 Nov 11;17:173. doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01430-x

Recent advances of enterovirus 71 3Cpro targeting Inhibitors

Rominah Onintsoa Diarimalala 1, Meichun Hu 1, Yanhong Wei 1, Kanghong Hu 1,
PMCID: PMC7657364  PMID: 33176821

Abstract

With CA16, enterovirus-71 is the causative agent of hand foot and mouth disease (HFMD) which occurs mostly in children under 5 years-old and responsible of several outbreaks since a decade. Most of the time, HFMD is a mild disease but can progress to severe complications such as meningitis, brain stem encephalitis, acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) and even death; EV71 has been identified in all severe cases. Therefore, it is actually one of the most public health issues that threatens children’s life. 3Cpro is a protease which plays important functions in EV71 infection. To date, a lot of 3Cpro inhibitors have been tested but none of them has been approved yet. Therefore, a drug screening is still an utmost importance in order to treat and/or prevent EV71 infections. This work highlights the EV71 life cycle, 3Cpro functions and 3Cpro inhibitors recently screened. It permits to well understand all mechanisms about 3Cpro and consequently allow further development of drugs targeting 3Cpro. Thus, this review is helpful for screening of more new 3Cpro inhibitors or for designing analogues of well known 3Cpro inhibitors in order to improve its antiviral activity.

Keywords: Enterovirus 71, Enterovirus 71 life cycle, 3Cpro functions, 3Cpro inhibitors, EV71 drugs screening

Background

Enterovirus 71, belongs to human enterovirus A species, Picornaviridae family, was discovered in a patient with central nervous system (CNS), in California, 1969 [1]. In term of structure, EV71 is a non-enveloped virus with a capsid made up of 60 protomers of envelop proteins and contains a single-stranded RNA positive [2, 3]. Each protomer contains four envelop proteins: VP1–VP2–VP3, located in the external part and are exposed to the host antibodies and cell receptors; and VP4 which is completely hidden in the internal part. The RNA genome is small (7.5kb) and constituted by 3 parts: Pl, P2 and P3, flanked by 2 UTRs (non-translated regions) located in 5 and 3 [4]. Several outbreaks and fatal cases, caused by this virus, make it a major public health issue mainly in the Asia-Pacific region. Indeed, China has experienced the latest and largest outbreaks with more than 1.7 million cases, 27.000 patients with severe neurological complications and 905 deaths, in 2010 [5]; while a cyclical and seasonal pattern occurs in Sarawak, Japan, Taiwan and Vietnam [69]. To manage such infections and epidemics is primordial, and the best way to eradicate this infection is the combination of a valuable vaccine and drugs [10]. Nevertheless, vaccine research has progressed more than drugs discovery because to date there is no approved drug against EV71 while 3 vaccines have completed their clinical trials III and are in following-up stage [11]. For this reason, the treatment is only symptomatic along with public surveillance systems [12]. Many plant extracts and chemical compounds have been discovered as having a potential effects against the virus and might be used as drugs against enterovirus 71 infections but none of them has been approved yet [13]. Thus, the finding of an approved and valuable drug is still an utmost importance. 3Cpro represent a valuable target because it has primordial functions in both virulence and virus-host interactions. This review highlights the important functions and recent progress of 3Cpro inhibitors and permit to acknowledge that 3Cpro is a valuable target for EV71 drug development, which should be deeply investigated.

Review on EV-71 life cycle

The EV71 life cycle goes through an attachment and entry, via a recognition and binding of surface protein to the cell receptors (SCARB2, PSGL-I, Anx2, Heparan Sulfate, Sialylated glycan) [14], to the release of the new virions by cell lysis (Fig. 1a). The mechanism of entry is known as through clathrin-mediated endocytosis (real events remain unclear) but recent investigation has showed that multiple pathways may be used by EV71 to enter the host cells [15, 16]. Then, a series of conformational changes occurs at low pH and let the virus to leave his icosahedral capsid structrure to an A-particle: loss of VP4 and formation of a channel followed by a release of RNA in cell cytoplasm [17]. Once the RNA is located in the cytoplasm, the viral genome, as a positive sense, act as an mRNA, so directly translated into a polyprotein (Pl, P2, P3) of 2193 AA. The polyprotein processing is assured by two main proteins 2Apro and 3Cpro. Thus, 2Apro and 3Cpro cleaved the polyprotein into VP1–VP4 (structural protein) and 2A–2C, 3A–3D (non-structural protein) [18]. When a considerable number of the 11 mature proteins are synthesized, the RNA replication take place after the interactions of IRES-specific-trans-acting factors (ITAFs), which are translocated from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, with the internal ribosome site (IRES) at its stem-loop [19, 20]. A negative-RNA is first synthesis within using the viral genome as template, and then followed by synthesis of numerous positive-strands using in turn the negative-strand as template. RNA-dependent RNA- polymerase (RdRp) or 3Dpo1 is the viral enzyme responsible of the RNA synthesis [18]. Finally, the structural proteins and the genome is encapsidated to form a new virion which is released during lysis of the cell (apoptosis).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Illustration of EV71 life cycle and virus-host interactions. EV71 replication steps: from attachment to release (a). 3C-host proteins interactions are blocked by 3Cpro inhibitors (b)

3Cpro functions

In addition to its polyprotein processing activity, the non-structural protein 3C plays a role in numerous biological mechanisms. Recent discovery of the 3C crystal structure has permit to identify the sites of its substrat binding affinity (between 2 similar β-ribbon) and confirmed its cleavage activity of the viral polyprotein but also several host proteins in order to optimize viral replication and spreading [21]. EV71 infection symptoms range from mild to severe diseases which depend on both the viral genetic sequence and the host immune system. In fact, the relationship between 3C genome sequence and the corresponding clinical symptoms (mild or severe) revealed that the 79th residue is the responsible sequence that leads to severe diseases [22]. Besides, Li et al. [23] have found another residue associated with the virulence of EV71, their finding suggests that the 69th residue is the virulent determinant because a single mutation of the hydrogen bond between Asn69 and Glu71 causes a significant decrease in the EV71 infection. The same result was found during the study of NK-1.8k compound where the substitution of asparagine at 69th residue by serine has decreased the fitness of the virus but on the other hand causes total resistance towards the tested compound. Indeed, the 69th residue plays an important role in 3Cpro functions even if it is not directly part of the active site according to the crystal structure [24]. EV71 interacts with the innate immune system through PRRs (Pattern-recognition receptors) such as TLRs which is involved in IFN-I production, RLRs responsible for detection of RNA virus infection and NLRs which function is to form cytosolic inflammasome [25]. In fact, concomitantly with the virus invasion, different host-immune responses occur such as production of type I interferon (IFN(α/β)) ; then to escape and to impair the immunity, the virus uses the proteolytic activity of 3Cpro by cleaving numerous needed host proteins: KPNA-I in order to suppress the signaling pathway STAT/KPNA-I [26], TAK1/TAB1/TAB2/TAB3 complex [27], TRIF, shut-off IR3/7 [28] and consequently block the production of IFN(α/β) Likewise, to permit the release and spread of virus progeny, 3C induced apoptosis of host cells through the capsase-3 pathway [29], cleavage of hnRNPA1 [30] and PinXl [31]. Finally, 3C is able to enter the nuclei through its precursor 3CD [32] and cleaves the polyadenylation factor CstF-64. As a result, the host mRNA 3' polyadenylation ,which is essential for its translocation, stability and translation, is shut off [33] (Fig. 1b). Due to such functions, 3C is definitely an excellent target for drug screening.

3Cpro inhibitors

3Cpro is an important target to block EV71 replication. Indeed, several 3Cpro inhibitors have been deeply investigated (Table 1, Fig. 1b)

Table 1.

Detailed list and classification of 3Cpro inhibitors: chemical structure, classes, effectivity, test in cell lines and animal models

graphic file with name 12985_2020_1430_Tab1a_HTML.jpg

graphic file with name 12985_2020_1430_Tab1b_HTML.jpg

Peptidomimetic compounds

  1. Rupintrivir and analogues: Rupintrivir (AG7088) is probably the well-known 3Cpro inhibitors to date. More than being a safe compound for the cells, it is able to bind to the active site of 3Cpro [21]. It was firstly identified as 3C Human Rhinovirus (HRV) inhibitors, later Zhang et al. [34] shown that it also had a strong antiviral activity against EV71 3Cpro in both cell lines and animal models. In fact, AG7088 inhibits the antiviral activity at EC50=0.01μM and protease activity at IC50=2.5±0.5μM with CC50=1000μM; in-vivo a low dose of 0.1 mg/kg prevent severe symptoms in suckling mice. Since the discovery of this compound, several analogues have been designed in order to increase its efficiency against EV71 infection [21]. To improve the anti-EV71 activity of rupintrivir, Kuo et al. has designed several inhibitor analogues (compound 1 to 10b) by replacing the P3 group of AG7088 with a series of cinnamoyl derivates. The compound 10b seemed to be potentially effective against EV71 among all the analogues, with an EC50 and CC50 of 0.018μM and >25μM respectively [35]. Then later Shang et al. [36] replaced the cinnamoyl of compound 1 to 2-chloride-phenylacetyl and noticed that the efficiency of it antiviral activity has been increased twiceIC50=1.89±0.25μM. Another method to further improve rupintrivir action is to combine it with IFN(α/β) . In fact, it was proved that rupintrivir and Interferon had an synergistic inhibition against EV71 infection [37].

  2. NK-1.8k: is a peptidyl aldehyde discovered to have strong anti-viral activity against not only EV71 but also the Enterovirus 68. The mechanism of action is known as the same as rupintrivir which targeted the 3Cpro EV71 in dependent-concentration manner. However, structurally, they are different because NK-1.8k is a dipeptide with six-member-ring lactam and rupintrivir, a tripeptide with five-member-ring lactam. Thus, its structure confers to NK-1.8k a better stability and drug features than rupintrivir which is always taken as reference. Indeed, NK-1.8k decrease the viral RNA production at EC50=34.5nM. Moreover, it is potent in all the 3 genotypes of EV71 in different cell lines (RD and T293 EC50=0.108μM ; Vero EC50=2.41μM) [24]. NK-1.8k represents a new peptidomimetic-compound which might take the place of rupintrivir as an achetype in EV71 drug screening.

  3. SG85: the 3Cpro inhibitors SG85 is a peptidic Michael acceptor compound. It has been tested against Enterovirus 68, EV71, echovirus 11 and various rhinovirus serotypes. However, it was found to be more potent against HRV11 and EV71 with EC50=60nM, EC50=180nM respectively [38]. Furthermore, it has screened to have strong antiviral activity against all the 11 EV71 strains with EC50 between 0.039 and 0.200μM [39]. Deep study of SG85 is needed in order to progress the drug discovery of EV71.

  4. (R)-1: is proved to be one of the most efficient 3Cpro inhibitors screened to date with an EC50=0.088±0.006μM. However, the presence of cyanohydrins, which is labile, gives it unstable and toxic properties [40].

  5. 4e and 4g: are compounds resulted from improvement of (R)-1. In fact, acyl cyanohydrins which make unstable (R)-1 have been replaced by 4-iminooxazolidin-2-one. After a series of test, 4e and 4g were the compound having the most potent antiviral activity with EC50=0.21±0.005 and 0.033±0.008μM respectively. Moreover, those compounds are safe towards the cell (CC50>100μM). Thus, they can be used as base for EV71 drug therapy [41].

  6. 8v, 8w and 8x: are alpha-keto-amid inhibitors against EV71 3Cpro. Zeng et al. noticed that the pivotal function of 3Cpro makes it the ideal target to fight against EV71 infection. Then, they synthesized several alpha-keto-amids as 3C inhibitors via Passerini reaction. Hence, the compounds 8v, 8w and 8x were exhibiting the most potent antiviral activity against enterovirus 71 with EC50=1.32±0.26,1.88±0.35and1.52±0.31μM respectively. Nevertheless, those compounds should be more improved and studied in order to contribute for EV71 drug discovery which is currently in need [42].

Non-peptidyl compound: DC07090

Recently identified as novel small potent molecule 3C inhibitor, it is a non-peptidyl compound designed by docking-based virtual screening and able to bind with 3C through its binding site and reversible inhibits its protease activity at EC50=22.09±1.07μM. Besides, DC07090 has a very low cytotoxicity rate (CC50>200μM) which makes it an attractive compound for further drug development [43].

Flavonoids

Flavonoids, originally synthesized by the plants as abiotic stresses: in order to protect themselves against ultraviolet radiation, pathogens and herbivores are a group of natural compounds largely distributed in fruits, vegetables, tea, soy foods and herbs. Most importantly, they have huge therapeutic bioactivities: anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory and antiviral properties. Researchers used them as a base of drug and dietary supplement in several diseases [44]. They present an attractive therapy for Enterovirus 71 due to their low toxicity towards host cells and their strong antiviral activity.

  1. Luteoloside: is a flavonoid distributed mainly in Lonicera japonica, plant used in traditionnal Chinese medicine, and has got broad activities such as anti-microbial, anti-cancer and antiviral activity against influenza virus, human rhinovirus, coxsackievirus B4 and enterovirus 71. The real mechanisms against EV71 remain unknown and need further deep to elucidate but it is sure that it blocked the pathway at 3C protease activity stage, IC50=0.36mM with a selectivity index of 5.3 according to the investigation of Cao et al. Therefore, it is an excellent candidate for drug development [45].

  2. Ouercetin: is a member of the flavonol subgroup of flavonoid found in many plants, fruits, grains and vegetables with anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer and anti-viral properties. It is probably one of the latest 3C inhibitor tested. Without toxicity towards the cells, our group’s recent finding reveals that quercentin exhibits a prominent effectivity against the protein 3C of enterovirus 71 by binding its substrate-binding pocket. Moreover, quercentin seems to have a preventive action. Indeed, cells pre-treated by quercetin present a high survival rate when infected by EV71 virus. Consequently, quercetin may be used both in preventive and in therapeutic application [46]. Therewith, a drug library composing of 1430 FDA approved drugs were previously screened from our laboratory. Interestingly, we found that the compound 3 had significantly anti-EV71 effect among them. Further mechanism study revealed that it targeted viral 3C protease and block viral replication (unpublished data).

  3. Diisopropyl Chrysin-7-i1 Phosphate (CPI): is a phosphate ester of chrysin, a natural flavonoid found in many plants. CPI is able to bind in the pocket site of hydrophobic and polar residue of 3C protease like LEU4- 8, SER-I I I, MET-112. PHE-113 and PRO-115 and inhibits the protease activity at EC50=4.03mM. Indeed, 3Cpro is unable to cleave human interferon regulator factor 9(IRF9) in the presence of CPI [47].

siRNA

siRNA is a powerful tool which can be used to target a specific gene in order to suppress it. Small interfering RNA therapeutics has been explored against several human viral infections including Enterovirus due to its specificity and promising effect both in-vitro and in-vivo [48]. Indeed, siRNA recognize, bind and degrade the target mRNA. It is a challenging strategy by the potential risk of mutation, inflammation or immune responses. However, Yang et al. showed that there is any toxicity of the siRNA targeted 3Cpro and 3Dpol during their investigation. They have designed a novel minicircle vector through 3Cpro and 3Dpol sequence available in Genbank. In fact, the siRNA did not affect the growth and viability of the cell. Moreover, it has reduced the protein levels to 10.8±6.7%, the viral mRNAs to 12.4±1.75% and the progeny virion production to 15% in infected cells. More importantly, it has protected the infected-suckling mice of a significant weight loss and hind limbs paralysis. Hence, further investigation must be conducted about silencing gene strategy within using 3Cpro as target [49].

Discussion

The unavailable of approved clinical drug makes the finding of a potent compound against EV71 really important. 3Cpro is an essential protein for EV71 life cycle and infection, moreover, it has strict subtract and does not have a lot of homologues in mammalian cells [35]. Thus, it is an excellent and attractive target for development of potent drugs. In this review, we summarized several classes of compound recently screened and also rupintrivir which is the drug of reference against 3Cpro. Actually, rupintrivir and analogues are considered as the most potent 3Cpro inhibitors. However, NK-1.8k has almost the same potency and efficiency as rupintrivir (Table 1), and as more stable, it can take the place of rupintrivir as archetype of 3Cpro inhibitors. In fact, peptidomimetic compounds represent the most potent class with the minimal effective concentration (180 nM to 2.89 μM, Table 1). It might be due to the fact that they are synthetically designed to fit in the 3Cpro active pocket. Nevertheless, flavonoids class, which is composed of active compounds from plants, has satisfactory antiviral activity as well. Indeed, nowadays, the trend of using bioactive compounds as drug candidates is done more and more, because of their broad biological and pharmacological activities, their availability and safety towards the host cells. Besides, the screening of non-peptidyl compound has been tempted but only DC07090 among 50 other compounds has given a satisfactory result [43]. Peptidomimetic compounds might be more potent and interesting than non-peptidyl-compounds. Hence, deep investigation, mainly in an appropriate animal model, should be done for luteoloside, quercentin and CPI which could be approved as EV71 therapy; while more and more peptidomimetic compounds should be designed and/or improved by using the revelation of 3Cpro structure as reference. Following the drug screening work, the 69th residue of 3Cpro, which plays important role in conferring EV71 resistance, could be investigated in order to make sure that the virus will not develop a resistance mutation toward the potent drug as investigated by Wang et al. [24]. Finally, the last recent strategy is the use of RNAi. In fact, there are few investigation about siRNA as therapy against EV71 infection; however, it has been successful against a wide range of viruses: Human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B/C virus, Influenza virus [5053]. Therefore, even if it is a challenging technique, investigating this strategy is worth it.

Conclusion

Coupling an effective vaccine and drugs against Enterovirus 71 is the most prominent manner to eradicate EV71 infection. The prevention will be secure by the vaccine and the treatment by an effective drug. However, the drug progress has not been as developed as for vaccines. In fact, currently only a surveillance is set up to control the disease. EV71 is a threat for children’s life; therefore, the screening of an effective drug is quite indispensable as soon as possible. For that, 3Cpro represent an excellent target due to the several key functions that it plays in both virulence and interaction of the virus to the host. More 3Cpro inhibitors should be exploited. Besides, as 3Cpro and 2Apro play role in early stage of the viral replication through cleaving the EV71 polyprotein, a combination of 2Apro and 3Cpro inhibitors in order to act in a synergetic manner may represent a valuable strategy. Indeed, the 3C X-ray structure is already defined so it would promotes further studies of its protease activity inhibitions by a compound. Meanwhile, all drugs screening must be tested in an appropriate animal model which will be compare to the in-vitro screening in order to achieve the goals of using it as treatment against EV71 infections.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

EV71

Enterovirus 71

CA16

Coxsackievirus A16

HFMD

Hand, foot and mouth disease

AFP

Acute flaccid paralysis

3Cpro

3C protease

CNS

Central Nervous System

RNA

Ribonucleic acid

UTRs

non-translated regions

SCARB-2

Scavenger receptor class B member 2

PSGL-1

P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1

Anx2

Annexin-2

2Apro

2A protease

3Dpol

3D polymerase

ITAFs

IRES-specific-trans-acting factors

IRES

Internal ribosome site

RdRp

RNA-dependent RNA- polymerase

PRRs

Pattern-recognition receptors

TLRs

Toll-like receptors

IFN-I

Interferon type I

RLRs

RIG-I-like receptors

NLRs

NOD-like receptors

IFNα/β

Interferon alpha/beta

KPNA-1

Karyopherin subunit Alpha-1

STAT

Signal transducer and activator of transcription

TAK1

Transforming growth factor beta activated kinase

TAB1/2/3

TGF-beta activated kinase 1/2/3

IR3/7

Interferon regulator 3/7

hnRNP

heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein

PinX1

PIN2 interacting telomerase inhibitor-1

mRNA

messenger Ribonucleic acid

HRV

Human Rhinovirus

EC50

50% Effective Concentration

IC50

50% Inhibition concentration

CC50

50% Cytotoxic Concentration

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

CPI

Chrysin-7-il Phosphate

LEU

Leucine

SER

Serine

MET

Methionine

PHE

Phenylalanine

PRO

Proline

siRNA

Small Intefering RNA

RNAi

RNA interference

RD

Rhabdomyosarcoma

Vero

Verda Reno

BGM

Buffalo green monkey kidney cells

Hela

Henrietta Lack

Author's contributions

RD wrote the review under the lead, supervision and correction of HK. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent for participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Schmidt NJ, Lennette EH, Ho HH. An apparently new enterovirus isolated from patients with disease ofthe central nervous system. J Infect Dis. 1974;129(3):304–309. doi: 10.1093/infdis/129.3.304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Putnak JR, Phillips BA. Picornaviral structure and assembly. Microbiol Rev. 1981;45(2):287–315. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.45.2.287-3l5.l98l. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yuan J, et al. Enterovirus A71 proteins: structure and function. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:286. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Solomon T, Lewthwaite P, Perera D, Cardosa MJ, McMinn P, Ooi MH. Virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and control of enterovirus 71. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(11):778–790. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70194-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zeng M, et al. Seroepidemiology of Enterovirus 71 infection prior to the 2011 season in children in Shanghai. J Clin Virol. 2012;53(4):285–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Podin Y, et al. Sentinel surveillance for human enterovirus 71 in Sarawak, Malaysia: lessons from the first 7 years. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:180. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mizuta K, et al. Molecular epidemiology of enterovirus 71 strains isolated from children in Yamagata, Japan, between 1990 and 2013. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63:1356–1362. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.079699-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Te Lee J, et al. Enterovirus 71 seroepidemiology in Taiwan in 2017 and comparison of those rates in 1997, 1999 and 2007. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0224110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Van Le T, Nguyen VTT, Nguyen QH, Pham DT. Molecular epidemiology analysis of enterovirus 71 strains isolated in Dak Lak, Vietnam, 2011–2016. J Med Virol. 2019;91(1):56–64. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liang Z, Wang J. EV71 vaccine, an invaluable gift for children. Clin Transl Immunol. 2014;3(10):e28. doi: 10.1038/cti.2014.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lin JY, Kung YA, Shih SR. Antivirals and vaccines for Enterovirus A71. J Biomed Sci. 2019;26(1):65. doi: 10.1186/sl2929-0l9-0560-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lin C, Chen KH, Tong Chen K. Update on enterovirus 71 infections: epidemiology, molecular epidemiology, and vaccine development. J Infect Dis Ther. 2018 doi: 10.4172/2332-0877.1000370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang H, Li Y. Recent progress on functional genomics research of enterovirus 71. Virol Sin. 2019;34(1):9–21. doi: 10.1007/sl2250-0l8-007l-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yamayoshi S, Fujii K, Koike S. Receptors for enterovirus 71. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2014;3:e53. doi: 10.1038/emi.2014.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xu Y, Liu Q, Zhang Z. Human EV71 invades human neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells by clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi XueZaZhi. 2017;33(6):761–766. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yuan M, et al. Enhanced human enterovirus 71 infection by endocytosis inhibitors reveals multiple entry pathways by enterovirus causing hand-foot-and-mouth diseases. Virol J. 2018;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/sl2985-0l7-09l3-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Danthi P, Tosteson M, Li Q, Chow M. Genome delivery and ion channel properties are altered in VP4 mutants of poliovirus. J Virol. 2003;77(9):5266–5274. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.9.5266-5274.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Baggen J, Thibaut HJ, Strating JR, van Kuppeveld FJ. The life cycle of non-polio enteroviruses and how to target it. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16(6):368–381. doi: 10.1038/s4l579-0l8-0005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang PN, et al. Far upstream element binding protein 1 binds the internal ribosomal entry site of enterovirus 71 and enhances viral translation and viral growth. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(22):9633–9648. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lin JY, Li ML, Shih SR. Far upstream element binding protein 2 interacts with enterovirus 71 internal ribosomal entry site and negatively regulates viral translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(1):47–59. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang J, et al. Crystal structures of enterovirus 71 3C protease complexed with rupintrivir reveal the roles of catalytically important residues. J Virol. 2011;85(19):10021–10030. doi: 10.1128/jvi.05l07-ll. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ma HY, et al. Association of EV713C polymorphisms with clinical severity. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018;51(5):608–613. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2016.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bingqing L, et al. A novel enterovirus 71 (EV71) virulence determinant: The 69th residue of 3C protease modulates pathogenicity. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:26. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang Y, Yang B, Zhai Y, Yin Z, Sun Y, Rao Z. Peptidyl aldehyde NK-1.8k suppresses enterovirus 71 and enterovirus 68 infection by targeting protease 3C. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(5):2636–2646. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00049-I5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen KR, Ling P. Interplays between enterovirus A71 and the innate immune system. J Biomed Sci. 2019;26(1):95. doi: 10.1186/sl2929-0l9-0596-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang C, et al. Enterovirus 71 suppresses interferon responses by blocking Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling through inducing karyopherin-α1 degradation. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(24):10262–10274. doi: 10.1074/jbc.Mll6.745729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lei X, Han N, Xiao X, Jin Q, He B, Wang J. Enterovirus 713C inhibits cytokine expression through cleavage of the TAK1/TAB 1/TAB 2/TAB3 complex. J Virol. 2014;88(17):9830–9841. doi: 10.1128/jvi.0l425-l4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lei X, Xiao X, Xue Q, Jin Q, He B, Wang J. Cleavage of interferon regulatory factor 7 by enterovirus 713C suppresses cellular responses. J Virol. 2013;87(3):1690–1698. doi: 10.1128/jvi.0l855-l2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li ML, et al. The 3C protease activity of enterovirus 71 induces human neural cell apoptosis. Virology. 2002;293(2):386–395. doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.1310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li ML, et al. EV713C protease induces apoptosis by cleavage of hnRNP Al to promote apaf-l translation. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(9):e0221048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li J, et al. Enterovirus 713C promotes apoptosis through cleavage of PinXl, a telomere binding protein. J Virol. 2017 doi: 10.1128/jvi.020l6-l6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sharma R, Raychaudhuri S, Dasgupta A. Nuclear entry of poliovirus protease- polymerase precursor 3CD: implications for host cell transcription shut-off. Virology. 2004;320(2):195–205. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2003.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Weng KF, Li ML, Hung CT, Shih SR. Enterovirus 713C protease cleaves a novel target CstF-64 and inhibits cellular polyadenylation. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(9):e1000593. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang XN, Song ZG, Jiang T, Shi BS, Hu YW, Yuan ZH. Rupintrivir is a promising candidate for treating severe cases of Enterovirus-71 infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(2):201–209. doi: 10.3748/wjg.vl6.i2.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kuo CJ, et al. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of 3C protease inhibitors as anti-enterovirus 71 agents. Bioorgan Med Chem. 2008;16(15):7388–7398. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shang L, et al. Biochemical characterization of recombinant enterovirus 71 3C protease with fluorogenic model peptide substrates and development of a biochemical assay. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(4):1827–1836. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04698-I4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hung HC, Wang HC, Shih SR, Teng IF, Tseng CP, Hsu JTA. Synergistic inhibition of enterovirus 71 replication by interferon and rupintrivir. J Infect Dis. 2011;203(12):1784–1790. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jirl74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tan J, et al. 3C protease of enterovirus 68: structure-based design of Michael acceptor inhibitors and their broad-spectrum antiviral effects against picornaviruses. J Virol. 2013;87(8):4339–4351. doi: 10.1128/jvi.0ll23-l2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tijsma A, et al. The capsid binder vapendavir and the novel protease inhibitor SG85 inhibit enterovirus 71 replication. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(11):6990–6992. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03328-I4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Y Z, et al. Cyanohydrin as an anchoring group for potent and selective inhibitors ofenterovirus 713C protease. J Med Chem. 2015;58(23):9414–9420. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ma Y, et al. 4-Iminooxazolidin-2-one as a Bioisostere of the cyanohydrin moiety: inhibitors of enterovirus 71 3C protease. J Med Chem. 2018;61(22):10333–10339. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zeng D, et al. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of α-keto amides as enterovirus 713C protease inhibitors. Bioorgan Med Chem Lett. 2016;26(7):1762–1766. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.02.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ma GH, et al. Identification and biochemical characterization of DC07090 as a novel potent small molecule inhibitor against human enterovirus 71 3C protease by structure-based virtual screening. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;124:981–991. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zakaryan H, Arabyan E, Oo A, Zandi K. Flavonoids: promising natural compounds against viral infections. Arch Virol. 2017;162(9):2539–2551. doi: 10.1007/s00705-0l7-34l7-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cao Z, et al. Luteoloside acts as 3C protease inhibitor of enterovirus 71 in vitro. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0148693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yao C, et al. Inhibition of enterovirus 71 replication and viral 3C protease by quercetin. Virol J. 2018;15(1):116. doi: 10.1186/sl2985-0l8-l023-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang J, Zhang T, Du J, Cui S, Yang F, Jin Q. Anti-enterovirus 71 effects of chrysin and its phosphate ester. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e89668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tan EL, Tan TMC, Chow VTK, Poh CL. Inhibition of enterovirus 71 in virusinfected mice by RNA interference. Mol Ther. 2007;15(11):1931–1938. doi: 10.1038/sj.mt.6300287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yang Z, Li G, Zhang Y, Liu X, Tien P. A novel minicircle vector based system for inhibting the replication and gene expression of enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16. Antivir Res. 2012;96(2):234–244. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Subramanya S, Kim SS, Manjunath N, Shankar P. RNA interference-based therapeutics for human immunodeficiency virus HIV-I treatment: synthetic siRNA or vectorbased shRNA? Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10(2):201–213. doi: 10.1517/14712590903448158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ashfaq UA, Yousaf MZ, Aslam M, Ejaz R, Jahan S, Ullah O. SiRNAs: potential therapeutic agents against Hepatitis C Virus. Virol J. 2011;8:1–6. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fujimoto Y, et al. Antiviral effects against influenza a virus infection by a short hairpin RNA targeting the non-coding terminal region of the viral nucleoprotein gene. J Vet Med Sci. 2019;81(3):383–388. doi: 10.1292/jvms.l8-0436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wang W, Peng H, Li J, et al. Controllable inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication by a DR1-targeting short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expressed from a DOX-inducible lentiviral vector. Virus Genes. 2013;46:393–403. doi: 10.1007/s11262-013-0886-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Virology Journal are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES