Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0241476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241476

Circulating whole genome miRNA expression corresponds to progressive right ventricle enlargement and systolic dysfunction in adults with tetralogy of Fallot

Chad S Weldy 1, Saad Ali Syed 2, Myriam Amsallem 1,3, Dong-Qing Hu 3, Xuhuai Ji 4, Rajesh Punn 3, Anne Taylor 3, Brittany Navarre 3, Sushma Reddy 3,*
Editor: Robert W Dettman5
PMCID: PMC7657553  PMID: 33175850

Abstract

Introduction

The adult congenital heart disease population with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is subject to chronic volume and pressure loading leading to a 40% probability of right ventricular (RV) failure by the 3rd decade of life. We sought to identify a non-invasive signature of adverse RV remodeling using peripheral blood microRNA (miRNA) profiling to better understand the mechanisms of RV failure.

Methods

Demographic, clinical data, and blood samples were collected from adults with repaired TOF (N = 20). RNA was isolated from the buffy coat of peripheral blood and whole genome miRNA expression was profiled using Agilent’s global miRNA microarray platform. Fold change, pathway analysis, and unbiased hierarchical clustering of miRNA expression was performed and correlated to RV size and function assessed by echocardiography performed at or near the time of blood collection.

Results

MiRNA expression was profiled in the following groups: 1. normal RV size (N = 4), 2. mild/moderate RV enlargement (N = 11) and 3. severe RV enlargement (N = 5). 267 miRNAs were downregulated, and 66 were upregulated across the three groups (fold change >2.0, FDR corrected p<0.05) as RV enlargement increased and systolic function decreased. qPCR validation of a subset of these miRNAs identified increasing expression of miRNA 28-3p, 433-3p, and 371b-3p to be associated with increasing RV size and decreasing RV systolic function. Unbiased hierarchical clustering of all patients based on miRNA expression demonstrates three distinct patient clusters that largely coincide with progressive RV enlargement. Pathway analysis of dysregulated miRNAs demonstrates up and downregulation of cell cycle pathways, extracellular matrix proteins and fatty acid synthesis. HIF 1α signaling was downregulated while p53 signaling was predicted to be upregulated.

Conclusion

Adults with TOF have a distinct miRNA profile with progressive RV enlargement and dysfunction implicating cell cycle dysregulation and upregulation in extracellular matrix and fatty acid metabolism. These data suggest peripheral blood miRNA can provide insight into the mechanisms of RV failure and can potentially be used for monitoring disease progression and to develop RV specific therapeutics to prevent RV failure in TOF.

Introduction

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common form of birth defects, with an estimated prevalence of 11.9 per 1000 children [1]. Due to tremendous growth in surgical and catheter-based interventions for treating patients with CHD, infant and childhood mortality has markedly declined [2]. As a result, there are now more adults than children living with CHD [3]. Heart failure is the most common cause of death in the adult CHD (ACHD) population [4]. The incidence of heart failure admissions in the ACHD population is estimated at 1.2 per 1000 patient-years, a greater than 10-fold higher incidence rate for a comparative aged population without CHD [5]. The risk of heart failure in ACHD population increases with increasing complexity of the heart defect such as in single ventricle, tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), and transposition of the great arteries after atrial switch operation [6, 7]. TOF is the most common form of cyanotic CHD, seen in 3.5% of infants born with CHD and is the largest growing group of complex ACHD patients [8]. Despite successful surgical repair, many patients have chronic volume and pressure loading leading to a 40% probability of right ventricular (RV) failure by the 3rd decade of life [9]. In addition, standard medical therapies used to treat left heart failure, such as ACEI/ARB and β-blocker therapy, have not been shown to provide benefit [1013].

Replacement of the pulmonary valve to correct chronic RV volume or pressure overload due to pulmonary regurgitation or RV outflow tract obstruction respectively can reduce RV size. However, the risk of ventricular tachycardia, sudden death, exercise capacity, functional heart failure class, long term RV function, and quality of life remain major clinical concerns [14]. Furthermore, the optimal timing of pulmonary valve replacement to prevent adverse RV remodeling and thereby improve long term outcomes is unknown [15]. Therefore, there is a need to better understand the cellular mechanisms which lead to progressive RV enlargement and dysfunction in TOF patients.

MicroRNA (miRNA) are noncoding RNA ~22 nucleotides in length which regulate gene expression through base-pairing with mRNA leading to mRNA degradation or translational inhibition. There is growing interest in circulating miRNA as biomarkers of heart failure [16, 17]. We have previously reported that miRNA expression is dynamically regulated in experimental RV failure [18]. Circulating miRNA profiles have been found to be distinct in patients with TOF, ventricular septal defect, and transposition of the great arteries after atrial switch operation when compared to healthy controls [1922], but there has been limited to no association between miRNA expression and clinically significant endpoints in these patients.

We hypothesized that miRNA profiles in circulating cells would provide insight into the mechanism of disease progression which could then aid in risk stratification and early prediction of RV failure in patients with TOF. We show that global peripheral blood miRNA isolated from the buffy coat are significantly altered in TOF patients with RV volume overload and RV enlargement and correlate with RV size and function.

Methods

Patient population

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Stanford University Medical Center. Inclusion criteria included age > 18 years, diagnosis of TOF with or without pulmonary atresia or major aortopulmonary collateral arteries (MAPCA) s/p complete surgical repair. Exclusion criteria included extracardiac co-morbidities including hepatic, renal or pulmonary disease, and intercurrent illness. Twenty adult patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot were recruited. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Patients were recruited in the outpatient clinic at the time of a routine, annual follow up visit which included a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Patients were not included if a clinic visit and TTE was urgently indicated due to rapidly progressive heart failure, arrhythmias, or concern for acute conduit/valvular abnormalities due to endocarditis. To evaluate distinct miRNA expression changes, patients were grouped into 3 categories based on the qualitative assessment of RV size on transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) by the reading cardiologist and subsequently confirmed by quantitative measurement of RV size by an independent cardiologist blinded to the patient and miRNA data: (1) “normal” RV size, (2) “mild/moderate” RV enlargement, and (3) “severe” RV enlargement.

Table 1. Characteristics of adult patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot included in study.

All Normal Mild/Moderate Severe
# of patients 20 4 11 5
Age at blood draw (Median, IQR) 36.9 (26.5–43.8) 29.0 (22.4–36.6) 35.8 (26.3–40.7) 46.5 (42.7–51.2)
# female 9/20 0/4 6/11 3/5
BMI (Median, IQR) 25.6 (22.8–29.6) 26.5 (25.6–28.1) 24.7 (22.5–28.9) 23.5 (22.7–31.4)
NHYA (Median, range) 1.8 (1–2) 2 2 2
Number of surgeries (Median, range) 2 (1–4) 2 (1–3) 2 (1–4) 2 (1–3)
Age at complete repair (Median, IQR) 5 (1.75–9.25) 6 (1.75–18) 5 (2–9.5) 5 (1–6)
# prior palliative shunt 7/20 1/4 3/11 3/5
# transannular patch 16/20 3/4 8/11 5/5
# RV to PA conduit 6/20 1/4 4/11 1/5
# pulmonary valve replacement 3/20 1/4 1/11 1/5
# on diuretic 3/20 1/4 1/11 1/5
# on beta blocker 7/20 1/4 3/11 3/5
Na (mmol/L) (Median, IQR) 139 (138–140) 138 (137.5–141) 139 (137.5–140.5) 140 (139–141)
Cr (mg/dL) (Median, IQR) 0.8 (0.71–0.85) 0.75 (0.67–0.8) 0.79 (0.7–0.85) 0.86 (0.8–0.9)
AST (U/L) (Median, IQR) 24 (20–32) 24 (22–45) 23 (15–32) 30 (22–32)
ALT (U/L) (Median, IQR) 33 (25–77) 46 (40–72) 26 (24–77) 30 (29–52)
Alk Phos (U/L) (Median, IQR) 76 (62–88) 104 (88–110) 71 (54–86) 78 (62–79)
Total Bilirubin (mg/dL) (Median, IQR) 0.6 (0.4–0.8) 0.4 (0.3–0.5) 0.6 (0.5–0.8) 0.4 (0.4–1)

Echocardiography

Digitized studies were acquired using Philips ultrasound systems. All measures were averaged over 3 cycles and analyzed according to the latest guidelines by a blinded certified level 3 reader (M.A.). Indices of right heart remodeling and function were measured on the focused RV apical 4-chamber view; measures included end-diastolic (RVEDA) and end-systolic areas (RVESA), maximal right atrial area (RA), RV fractional area change, and RV free wall Lagrangian longitudinal strain (RVLS). RVLS was measured from mid-endocardial end-diastolic and end-systolic manually traced lengths (as the software-based speckle-tracking method was not possible in all patients due to the quality of the images) and calculated as (end-systolic length−end-diastolic length)/end-diastolic length as previously validated [23]. Frame rate for RVLS acquisition ranged from 39–70 frames/second. RAP was estimated from the inferior vena cava size and collapse according to the recent 2015 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines. RV systolic pressure from the tricuspid regurgitation maximal velocity and estimated RAP as previously published [24]. The severity of the tricuspid regurgitation was qualitatively classified into 4 grades. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured from the apical 4-chamber view by method of disk.

Cardiac MRI (cMRI) imaging was not available for all patients and therefore comparisons of RV size and function to miRNA signature based on cMRI were not performed. Of 20 patients recruited, 12 patients had a cMRI but there were only 4 patients where cMRI was done at or near the time of echocardiogram and blood draw (S1 Table in S1 File). Therefore, assessment of RV size and function based on TTE imaging done at the time of blood sample collection was used. RV size and function by TTE was compared with the gold standard cMRI derived RV size and function in the 4 patients with recently available cMRI.

MiRNA expression profiling

After consent was obtained, a peripheral blood sample was collected, spun down and the buffy coat was collected and stored at -80°C for future miRNA isolation. Total RNA was isolated from frozen buffy coats (200 ul) using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and purified using RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Dusseldorf, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quality and quantity were measured using a QIAxpert (QIAGEN, Cat. #9002340, Germany). RNA integrity was determined by the Bioanalyzer 2100 NANO analysis (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA). MiRNA labeling and array hybridization were carried out according to Agilent’s protocol for the miRNA Microarray System with miRNA Complete Labeling and Hyb Kit (Agilent, p/n 5190–0456). Briefly, 100 ng of total RNA was used for miRNA labeling with cyanine 3 then hybridized onto the SurePrint custom G3 miRNA Microarray (8x60k, p/n G4871A) then washed and scanned according to the manufacturer instructions. Data were extracted using Agilent Feature Extraction (FE) Software. Microarray normalization was performed by GeneSpring GX 14.9.1 software. All arrays were normalized by using the 75th percentile method [25].

miRNA microarray and pathway analysis

MiRNA expression analyses were performed using GeneSpring GX 14.9.1 software (Agilent). Normalized data between the 20th and 100th percentile with detected probes were used for further analysis. Quality control was performed, after which ANOVA with Benjamini Hochberg multiple testing correction was applied. Significantly altered miRNA was determined based on corrected P value < 0.05 and fold change between any group >2.0. MiRNA pathway analysis and target prediction was performed using Diana Tools miRPath v.2.0 [26] with TarBase V7.0. KEGG pathways were deemed significant with FDR correction and P<0.05.

Biomark microfluidic qPCR array

Gene expression of 5 candidate miRNA identified by microarray, miR 28-3p, miR 34b-3p, miR 371b-3p, miR 433-3p, and miR 451b were validated by qPCR using Fluidigm Biomark multiplexing qPCR using target-specific stem-loop reverse transcription (RT) primers for 3’ templates. Fold change was evaluated using deltaCT method from “normal” RV group. 10 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA at 50°C for 15 minutes using the High Capacity Reverse Transcription kit (ABI). RT was performed directly on a 96-well PCR plate (ABI) containing lysis buffer (Invitrogen) by using SuperScript III One-Step RT-PCR System with PlatinumTaq (CellDirect kit, Invitrogen). PreAmp was performed on a thermocycler using the TaqMan PreAmp Master Mix Kit (Invitrogen) added to cDNA and pooled Taqman assays. RT enzyme was inactivated and the Taq polymerase reaction was started by bringing the sample to 95°C for 2 minutes. The cDNA was preamplified by denaturing for 10 (total RNA) to 18 (single cell) cycles at 95°C for 15 seconds, annealing at 60°C for 4 minutes. The resulting cDNA product was diluted 1:2 with 1x TE buffer (Invitrogen). 2X Applied Biosystems Taqman Master Mix, Fluidigm Sample Loading Reagent, and preamplified cDNA were mixed and loaded into the 48.48 Dynamic Array (Fluidigm) sample inlets, followed by loading 10X assays into the assay inlets. Manufacturer’s instructions for chip priming, pipetting, mixing, and loading onto the BioMark system were followed. Real-time PCR was carried out with the following conditions: 10 min at 95°C, followed by 50 cycles of 15 sec at 95°C and 1 min at 60°C. Data were analyzed using Fluidigm software. All reactions were performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

Echocardiographic and qPCR data of continuous variables are presented as mean with standard error and geometric mean with geometric standard error respectively. Differences between normal RV, mild to moderate RV enlargement and severe RV enlargement were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparison testing. Linear regression between two continuous variables was compared using simple linear regression modeling. p<0.05 was considered significant using Prism v8.3.1 (GraphPad Software LLC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Results

Patient characteristics and echocardiographic analysis

Patient demographics are shown in Table 1. The median patient age was 36.9 years at the time of blood draw (interquartile range (IQR) 26.5–43.8 years). Nine of 20 patients (45%) were female. Median BMI was 25.6 (IQR 22.8–29.6). All patients had either NYHA class I or II symptomology by chart review. All patients were diagnosed with TOF, two of whom had concurrent major aortopulmonary collateral arteries (MAPCAs). Patients had undergone a median of 2 (range 1–4) cardiac surgeries prior to recruitment (Table 1). Median age of complete repair was 5 years of age (range 1–42, IQR 1.75–9.25). Most common sequence of repair for these patients included an initial Blalock Taussig (BT) Shunt as a neonate with subsequent complete repair with VSD closure and transannular patch in childhood, although 3 of 20 patients had late repairs (no surgical management until age > 10). Three of 20 patients were on diuretic therapy and 7 of 20 patients were on β-blocker therapy for arrhythmias, which were well controlled at the time of recruitment. No patients were on ACE inhibitors. Data were collected from transthoracic echocardiograms performed at or near the time of blood collection. Of 20 patients, 4 patients were identified as having normal RV size, 11 patients were identified as having mild/moderate RV enlargement, and 5 were identified as having severe RV enlargement. Patients in the “normal” RV size group had more females and were younger. Of the 3 patients with late repair, 1 was in the “normal” RV size group and 2 were in the “mild/mod” RV size group. RV end-diastolic area (RVEDA), RV end-systolic area (RVESA), and right atrial (RA) area increased from normal RV size to mild-moderate RV enlargement to severe RV enlargement (Fig 1A–1C). There was a trend towards a decrease in RV fractional area change (RVFAC) and RV longitudinal strain (RVLS) between normal and severe groups but this did not reach significance (Fig 1D and 1E). No patient had grade 4 tricuspid regurgitation. There was no significant difference in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) between groups (Fig 1F). The RVEDA (cm2), RVESA (cm2) and RVFAC (%) by echocardiogram were compared to the MRI RVEDV (ml), RVESV (ml) and RVEF (%) respectively in 4 patients where cMRI was available. There is a strong and significant correlation between the echocardiogram and the cMRI assessment of RV size (measures of RVEDA or RVESA vs RVEDV or RVESV respectively: R = 0.83, p<0.01) and a trend of association for measure of RV systolic function (RVFAC vs RVEF: R = 0.77, p = 0.22) (S1 Table in S1 File).

Fig 1. Echocardiographic characteristics by patient group based on initial qualitative RV assessment of “normal”, “mild/mod” and “severe” RV enlargement.

Fig 1

(A) RV end diastolic area (cm2) (RVEDA) and (B) RV end systolic area (cm2) (RVESA) increased with mild-moderate and severe RV enlargement, (C) right atrial area (cm2) increased with severe RV enlargement, (D) RV fractional area change (RVFAC) showed a trend toward a decrease with severe RV enlargement, (E) RV free wall Lagrangian longitudinal strain (RVLS) showed a trend toward an increase with severe RV enlargement, and (F) LV ejection fraction (LVEF%) was similar in all groups, N = 4-11/group. RV–right ventricle, LV–left ventricle. Data is shown as mean±SEM. Comparison with ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.

Global miRNA changes correspond to progressive RV enlargement in adult patients with TOF

Of 20 patients, 14 had blood samples collected within 24 hours of a clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiogram. Of the remaining 6 patients, 3 had blood samples collected within 7 days of a clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiogram, 1 within 14 days, and 2 within 5 months. Of the two patients with greater duration between blood sample and echocardiogram, RV size and function were stable based on follow-up echocardiogram. Global miRNA microarray profile decreased as RV size increased (Fig 2A). 333 miRNA were significantly dysregulated between patients with normal RV size, mild-moderate RV enlargement, and severe RV enlargement (fold change > 2.0, FDR corrected p< 0.05), 267 miRNA were downregulated and 66 were upregulated (Fig 2B) (S2 and S3 Tables in S1 File). Interestingly, these miRNAs progressively changed with RV size (Fig 2C and 2D). Intriguingly, there was remarkable concordance where increasing miRNA between the normal to mild/moderate RV enlargement groups appeared to be largely the same miRNA increased between the normal to severe and mild/moderate to severe RV enlargement groups. A similar finding was seen for decreasing miRNA (Fig 2C and 2D).

Fig 2. Global miRNA expression in tetralogy of Fallot changes with increasing RV size.

Fig 2

(A). Violin plot demonstrates decreasing miRNA expression with increasing RV enlargement with greater variability in miRNA expression in severe RV enlargement, N = 4-11/group. (B) Individual significantly dysregulated miRNA (FDR <0.05) change with increasing RV enlargement. (C) (D) Venn diagram analyses of upregulated and downregulated miRNAs between groups show that the same miRNAs are dysregulated across groups. RV–right ventricle.

Unbiased hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis

We next evaluated whether unbiased hierarchical clustering of patients based on global miRNA expression would correspond to RV size and or function. We first performed unbiased clustering between the 3 predetermined groups (Normal RV size, mild/moderate RV enlargement, and severe RV enlargement), where we observed that the normal group clustered away from the mild/mod and severe groups (Fig 3A). We then performed hierarchical clustering among all 20 patients, where patients clustered into 3 distinct groups (Fig 3B): group 1 was predominantly “normal” and “mild/moderate”, group 2 was predominantly “mild/moderate” and some “severe”, and group 3 appeared to be equally “mild/moderate” and “severe”. Principal component analysis of all 20 patients revealed distinct separation between patients, where patients with “normal” RV size appeared to cluster together, and those with “severe” RV enlargement appeared to cluster together, and those with “mild/moderate” RV enlargement appeared to reside between or to cluster closer to “normal” or “severe” enlargement groups (Fig 3C). We observed a trend toward increasing RVEDA and an increase in RVESA (p = 0.04) between group 1 to 3 (S1A and S1B Fig in S1 File), showing unbiased clustering grouped patients by RV size. We also observed a trend toward a larger right atrial area, lower RVFAC and RVLS (S1C–S1E Fig in S1 File). LVEF was unchanged between the groups (S1F Fig in S1 File).

Fig 3. Hierarchical clustering of patients based on miRNA expression shows relationship to RV size.

Fig 3

(A) Heatmap of groups based on echocardiography into normal RV size (N = 4), mild-moderate (N = 11) and severe RV enlargement (N = 5). (B) Unbiased hierarchical clustering based on differentially expressed miRNA identifies three distinct groups: Group 1—patients with mostly normal RV size, Group 2 –patients with mostly mild-moderate RV enlargement and Group 3 –patients with mild-moderate and severe RV enlargement (ANOVA FDR < 0.05). (C) Principal component analysis of individual patients demonstrates clustering of patients based on miRNA global profile (red = normal, brown = mild/mod, blue = severe). RV–right ventricle.

MiRNA dysregulated with RV enlargement predict derangements in cell cycle, extracellular matrix, metabolism, and cell death

To better understand the implication for the observed global miRNA expression profile changes, we performed pathway analysis on both upregulated and downregulated miRNA using Diana Tools software. We observed 42 pathways to be significantly dysregulated by upregulated miRNAs and 58 pathways to be significantly dysregulated by downregulated miRNAs (S4 and S5 Tables in S1 File). Clustering dendrogram analysis of dysregulated pathways for upregulated miRNAs show that pathways appear to cluster into 4 main groups suggesting downregulation in, 1) pathways in cancer, proteoglycans in cancer, and viral carcinogenesis, 2) adherens junction, HIF-1 signaling, and glioma, 3) cell cycle, hippo signaling, and estrogen signaling pathway, and 4) extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interaction, fatty acid biosynthesis, and fatty acid metabolism (Fig 4A). Dysregulated pathways for downregulated miRNAs also appear to cluster into 4 main groups suggesting upregulation in, 1) cell cycle, p53 signaling, and RNA transport, 2) TGF-β signaling pathway, lysine degradation, and hippo signaling, 3) adherens junction, FoxO signaling pathway, and protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum, 4) ECM-receptor interaction, fatty acid biosynthesis, fatty acid metabolism (Fig 4B).

Fig 4. Pathway analysis shows distinct biological pathway clusters.

Fig 4

Clustering of significantly dysregulated pathways for (A) upregulated miRNA and (B) downregulated miRNA. Pathways separate into 4 main clusters, both up and down regulated pathways include components of cell cycle both and fatty acid metabolism. Targets of upregulated miRNA include HIF1 signaling pathway. Targets of downregulated miRNA include TGF-β signaling pathway. FDR < 0.05.

Cell cycle pathways are the most dysregulated in RV enlargement in TOF

Cell cycle pathways appear to be the most significantly dysregulated in both the up and downregulated pathways. Among the upregulated miRNA, 13 miRNA were involved in cell cycle pathways, including miRNAs 28-3p, 149-3p, 196a-3p, 431-3p, and 675-5p, predicting downregulation of 51 target genes including SMAD3 and 4, TGF-β1 and 2, E2F family transcription factors including E2F1, E2F2, and E2F5, and cell division cycle family of regulatory proteins including CDC6, 20, 23, and 27. For downregulated miRNA, 34 miRNA were identified as being involved in cell cycle pathway, including miRNAs 19b-1-5p, 20b-3p, 122-5p, 130a-5p, and 197-3p, predicting upregulation of 83 target genes similar to that seen in upregulated miRNA. Interestingly, these downregulated miRNAs are also known to increase the expression of target genes HDAC1, HDAC2, and RB1 which increase global chromatin accessibility, increase cardiac fibrosis and decrease cardiac function [27, 28]. The overall weight of dysregulated miRNA in cell cycle pathways suggests a net upregulation of this pathway. The TGF-β signaling pathway was also found to be significantly dysregulated by both the up and downregulated miRNA, driven by mRNA targets including TGF-β, SMAD and E2F families, and also BMPR1B, BMPR2, MYC, and ROCK1. Therefore, the predicted mRNA targets suggest upregulation of many components of the cell cycle pathway, mostly the extracellular matrix which may be countered by downregulation of many components of the same pathway.

HIF-1α pathway is downregulated in RV enlargement in TOF

Upregulated miRNA seen in RV enlargement predict downregulation of HIF1 signaling (p = 7.7E-4) which may suggest an inhibition of this pathway. There were 11 miRNA found to be involved in this pathway, including miRNAs 28-3p, 138-5p, 143-5p, 431-3p, and 671-5p. There were 36 significant mRNA targets identified, which include HIF1A, NFKB1, VEGFA, IL6R, TIMP1, EGFR, PRKCA, and BCL2. This finding may suggest an inhibition of these mRNA targets involved in angiogenesis in response to hypoxia.

Fatty acid metabolism is dysregulated in RV enlargement in TOF

Pathway analysis also revealed fatty acid biosynthesis to be significantly dysregulated by both up (p = 4.79E-09) and downregulated miRNA (4.76E-06). For upregulated miRNA, this pathway is driven by miRNA 604 which targets fatty acid synthase. There were 9 downregulated miRNA found to be involved in this pathway, including miRNAs 122-5p, 149-5p, 185-3p, 197-3p, and 629-3p which target fatty acid synthase, acetyl-coA carboxylase A and B, malonyl-CoA-acyl carrier protein transacylase, and long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase isoform 1 and 4. This may suggest a net upregulation in fatty acid metabolism to maintain the metabolic demands of the heart (S2 Fig in S1 File).

qPCR validation of miRNA microarray data

qPCR validation of miRNA microarray results was performed on 5 select miRNA which have been previously described in heart failure, cell cycle progression, coronary artery disease, or vascular function [18, 2934]: miRNA 28-3p, miRNA 433-3p, miRNA 371b-3p, miRNA 34b-3p and miRNA 451b. MiRNAs 28-3p, 371b-3p, and 433-3p expression increased in patients with mild-moderate RV enlargement and severe RV enlargement compared to those with normal RV size (S3A, S3C and S3D Fig in S1 File), miRNA 451b expression decreased similar to the microarray results (S3E Fig in S1 File) while miRNA 34b-3p expression did not change (S3B Fig in S1 File).

miRNA expression correlates with of RV size and function

We further evaluated the relationship between the miRNAs validated by qPCR and echocardiographic RV size and function using linear regression analysis. There was a linear relationship between increasing miR 28-3p expression and increasing RVEDA (R2 = 0.23, p = 0.03) and RVESA (Fig 5A and 5B) (R2 = 0.32, p = 0.009). Increasing miRNA 28-3p expression was also associated with decreasing RVFAC and RVLS (R2 = 0.17, p = 0.06 and R2 = 0.22, p = 0.036, respectively) (Fig 5C and 5D). Increasing miRNA 433-3p expression was associated with a trend of significance with increasing RVEDA and a significant relationship to RVESA (Fig 5E and 5F) (R2 = 0.17, p = 0.06 and R2 = 0.24, p = 0.028, respectively). There are similar trends of a relationship of increasing miRNA 433-3p and decreasing RVFAC and RVLS (R2 = 0.12, p = 0.13 and R2 = 0.16, p = 0.07, respectively) (Fig 5G and 5H). Increasing miRNA 371b-3p expression was not associated with increasing RV size but was associated with decreasing RVFAC (R2 = 0.19, p = 0.049) (S4A–4D Fig in S1 File). MiRNA 451b expression was downregulated and was weakly associated with increasing RVEDA but not with RVESA, RVFAC, or RVLS (S4E–S4H Fig in S1 File). Therefore, many of the validated miRNAs were associated with increasing RV size and decreasing RV function.

Fig 5. miRNA 28-3p and 433-3p have linear relationships to RV size and systolic function.

Fig 5

Increasing expression of miR 28-3p is associated with increased (A) RVEDA and (B) RVESA, (C) a trend toward decreasing RVFAC and, (D) increasing RVLS. Increasing expression of miR 433-3p is associated with increasing (E) RVEDA (p = 0.07), (F) RVESA and (H) RVLS (p = 0.07). (G) miR 433-3p expression is not associated with RVFAC. Data is shown as dot plot with simple linear regression, *p<0.05,**p<0.01. RV–right ventricle, RVEDA–RV end diastolic area, RVESA–RV end systolic area, RVFAC–RV fractional area change, RVLS–RV longitudinal strain.

Discussion

The adult congenital heart disease population with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is rapidly growing in numbers but are subject to a high incidence of RV failure due to chronic volume and pressure loading [2, 6, 7, 9, 35]. Replacement of the pulmonary valve improves pulmonary regurgitation or RV outflow tract obstruction and can reduce RV size. However, the risk of arrhythmias, sudden death and long term RV function are not improved [14] suggesting that irreversible myocardial remodeling has occurred prior to pulmonary valve replacement. The cellular processes leading to irreversible myocardial damage is unknown. We evaluated a non-invasive blood-based miRNA signature in circulating cells to better understand the mechanisms of RV failure and to risk-stratify disease severity. We have identified a unique miRNA signature as the RV enlarges and becomes dysfunctional in patients with TOF. This unique miRNA signature demonstrates both up and downregulation of various components of cell cycle pathways, extracellular matrix proteins and fatty acid synthesis, progressive upregulation in cell death pathways, and downregulation in HIF-1α signaling. These findings highlight the potential for blood miRNA to be used for investigating molecular mechanisms of RV failure in TOF as well as for discovery of novel biomarkers of RV failure.

MiRNA are critical in mediating complex transcriptional changes and govern deleterious as well as protective gene expression responses to stress. MiRNA changes in peripheral blood have been utilized to identify potential novel biomarkers of cardiovascular disease including heart failure [16, 17], congenital heart disease [20, 21], pulmonary hypertension [36], and sudden cardiac death [37]. Circulating miRNA profiles can also dynamically change with pulmonary hypertension secondary to CHD [36]. In these investigations, miRNA has been measured from either plasma or serum, where presumably stable miRNAs are secreted from cells and can reflect miRNA expression changes in disease. Alternatively, some investigators have evaluated whole blood, combining miRNA isolated from plasma and intracellular miRNA from circulating cells. Importantly, these two methods have shown different results, where miRNA from whole blood appears to show a more significant and consistent change in miRNA expression levels compared to miRNA isolated from serum [19, 21]. We therefore evaluated miRNA in circulating cells (buffy coat) in the blood and discovered heightened miRNA expression across hundreds of miRNAs compared to any other report to date. In addition, despite the small patient sample, we observed a robust, dynamic change in miRNA expression with increasing RV enlargement and systolic dysfunction. The buffy coat comprises of circulating inflammatory cells namely the white blood cells and platelets. Therefore, the heightened miRNA expression in these cells may implicate a systemic inflammatory state in repaired TOF patients even during the stage of RV enlargement prior to the development of RV failure providing insight into the mechanisms mediating RV failure.

The mechanism by which miRNA expression changes in inflammatory cells in the peripheral blood in response to progressive RV enlargement and systolic dysfunction is unclear. One possibility is that as RV enlargement progresses, local and systemic stress responses are activated including adrenergic signaling, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone signaling, and hypoxic signaling which may lead to dynamic miRNA expression changes in circulating inflammatory cells. Another possibility is that miRNA detected in the plasma or serum may be released directly from stressed organs and can influence miRNA expression in circulating cells which can then have systemic effects including in the myocardium in TOF again highlighting systemic transcriptional changes in patients with TOF even prior to the development of RV failure (Fig 6). We cannot assess the role of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers since none of the patients were on these agents. Although some of the patients were on β blockers, the cohort was too small to evaluate their role on the miRNA expression.

Fig 6. Proposed schematic of progressive RV dysfunction leading to dynamic changes in circulating miRNA expression.

Fig 6

Progressive RV enlargement likely leads to systemic responses to incite global transcriptional changes within circulating cells which may subsequently incite changes in myocardial tissue, activating pathways including cell cycle, fatty acid biosynthesis, and TGF-β, while inhibiting HIF1. Red arrows denote the most dysregulated pathways.

We observed that global miRNA expression decreases with worsening RV enlargement. A similar finding has been seen in other reports evaluating miRNA signatures found in plasma of heart failure patients [17, 38] where the authors suggest that as patients develop worsening volume overload, a dilutional effect can lead to a reduction in measured plasma miRNA. Although this may play a role in miRNA measured in plasma, it seems less likely in the buffy coat. This reduction in total miRNA may lead to activation of a global mRNA transcriptional response to stress. Abu-Halima et al. [19] evaluated whole blood miRNA (circulating cells + plasma) in TOF patients with and without heart failure. They found a significant reduction in expression of miRNAs 421, 1233-3p, 625-5p in 3 patients with clinical heart failure. Although our findings did not validate their specifically reported miRNA, our work does corroborate that peripheral blood miRNA expression changes in adults with TOF and identifies a linear relationship between miRNA expression and progressive RV enlargement and dysfunction prior to the development of clinical heart failure. We also show that circulating miRNA expression can reclassify patients particularly those with mild-moderate RV enlargement into those with a miRNA signature similar to controls and those with miRNA signature similar to patients with severe RV enlargement. This data may be used to risk-stratify patients and determine timing of interventions. The increasing age across groups seen in our cohort may influence the peripheral blood miRNA. Since many of our patients did not have cardiac MRI data, it is not known whether MRI evaluation of RV size and function would better correlate with miRNA signature than echocardiographic evaluation of RV size and function.

We have previously shown dynamic miRNA changes in experimental RV failure with upregulation in cell death pathways, oxidant stress and extracellular matrix proteins and inhibition of angiogenic pathways in RV myocardium [18, 39]. Whether circulating miRNA signature provide insights into adverse RV remodeling or into the systemic response to RV stress is unknown. However, we now demonstrate circulating miRNA dysregulation which targets the very same pathways seen in our experimental animal model of RV failure suggesting that the circulating miRNA signature could indeed serve as a window into RV adverse remodeling (Fig 6).

Our findings provide insight into the potential role of multiple miRNA in mediating RV failure, including miRNAs 28, 371, 433, and 451. We have previously demonstrated that miRNA 28 is primarily increased in the non-myocyte fraction (predominantly fibroblasts) in RV failure [18]. The role of miRNA 28-3p in heart failure is unclear but interestingly miRNA 28-3p expression has been found to be positively correlated to acute coronary syndrome risk [40] and is increased in patients with diabetes [41]. MiRNA 28-3p is known to have an important role in regulating cell proliferation and differentiation [4244] and may be used as a plasma biomarker of acute pulmonary embolism being released from damaged lung tissue [33]. MiRNAs 371, 433, and 451 have been reported to have important roles in cell proliferation, maintenance of redox state, and angiogenesis [30, 31, 4550]. In summary these miRNAs regulate cell proliferation, enhance oxidative stress, and inhibit endothelial function, all of which can be used to follow disease progression and serve as future targets for RV specific drug development.

Conclusion

Adults with repaired TOF are a rapidly growing group of patients with significant morbidity related to heart failure. Global miRNA expression in circulating inflammatory cells in the peripheral blood in repaired TOF patients identified upregulation in profibrotic pathways, cell proliferation and cell death pathways, and downregulation in fatty acid biosynthesis, and HIF-1α signaling. These observations were noted even prior to the development of clinical RV failure suggesting that many adverse remodeling pathways are active prior to the development of changes seen by imaging. We describe for the first time unique mechanisms which may lead to RV failure and identify novel biomarkers which may be used to follow disease progression and aid in risk stratification.

Supporting information

S1 File

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. George Lui of Stanford’s Adult Congenital Heart Disease program for his thorough review and helpful comments for this manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

SR was supported by grants from the NIH K08 HL127277, U.S. Department of Defens PR151448, Reddy Foundation, and American Heart Association 16GRNT31200008. MA was supported by a Stanford Cardiovascular Institute – MHRCI seed grant. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Marelli AJ, Mackie AS, Ionescu-Ittu R, Rahme E, Pilote L. Congenital heart disease in the general population: changing prevalence and age distribution. Circulation. 2007;115(2):163–72. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.627224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Khairy P, Ionescu-Ittu R, Mackie AS, Abrahamowicz M, Pilote L, Marelli AJ. Changing mortality in congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(14):1149–57. 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stout KK, Broberg CS, Book WM, Cecchin F, Chen JM, Dimopoulos K, et al. Chronic Heart Failure in Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(8):770–801. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Raissadati A, Nieminen H, Haukka J, Sairanen H, Jokinen E. Late Causes of Death After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A 60-Year Population-Based Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(5):487–98. 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zomer AC, Vaartjes I, van der Velde ET, de Jong HM, Konings TC, Wagenaar LJ, et al. Heart failure admissions in adults with congenital heart disease; risk factors and prognosis. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(3):2487–93. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alshawabkeh LI, Opotowsky AR. Burden of Heart Failure in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2016;13(5):247–54. 10.1007/s11897-016-0301-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Norozi K, Wessel A, Alpers V, Arnhold JO, Geyer S, Zoege M, et al. Incidence and risk distribution of heart failure in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease after cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(8):1238–43. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.10.065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Apitz C, Webb GD, Redington AN. Tetralogy of Fallot. Lancet. 2009;374(9699):1462–71. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60657-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rodriguez FH 3rd, Marelli AJ. The epidemiology of heart failure in adults with congenital heart disease. Heart Fail Clin. 2014;10(1):1–7. 10.1016/j.hfc.2013.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Book WM, Shaddy RE. Medical therapy in adults with congenital heart disease. Heart Fail Clin. 2014;10(1):167–78. 10.1016/j.hfc.2013.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Doughan AR, McConnell ME, Book WM. Effect of beta blockers (carvedilol or metoprolol XL) in patients with transposition of great arteries and dysfunction of the systemic right ventricle. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(5):704–6. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.10.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.van der Bom T, Winter MM, Bouma BJ, Groenink M, Vliegen HW, Pieper PG, et al. Effect of valsartan on systemic right ventricular function: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Circulation. 2013;127(3):322–30. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.135392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Babu-Narayan SV, Uebing A, Davlouros PA, Kemp M, Davidson S, Dimopoulos K, et al. Randomised trial of ramipril in repaired tetralogy of Fallot and pulmonary regurgitation: the APPROPRIATE study (Ace inhibitors for Potential PRevention Of the deleterious effects of Pulmonary Regurgitation In Adults with repaired TEtralogy of Fallot). Int J Cardiol. 2012;154(3):299–305. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.09.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Therrien J, Provost Y, Merchant N, Williams W, Colman J, Webb G. Optimal timing for pulmonary valve replacement in adults after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(6):779–82. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.11.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Therrien J, Siu SC, McLaughlin PR, Liu PP, Williams WG, Webb GD. Pulmonary valve replacement in adults late after repair of tetralogy of fallot: are we operating too late? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(5):1670–5. 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00930-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vogel B, Keller A, Frese KS, Leidinger P, Sedaghat-Hamedani F, Kayvanpour E, et al. Multivariate miRNA signatures as biomarkers for non-ischaemic systolic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(36):2812–22. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Watson CJ, Gupta SK, O'Connell E, Thum S, Glezeva N, Fendrich J, et al. MicroRNA signatures differentiate preserved from reduced ejection fraction heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17(4):405–15. 10.1002/ejhf.244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Reddy S, Zhao M, Hu DQ, Fajardo G, Hu S, Ghosh Z, et al. Dynamic microRNA expression during the transition from right ventricular hypertrophy to failure. Physiol Genomics. 2012;44(10):562–75. 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00163.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abu-Halima M, Meese E, Keller A, Abdul-Khaliq H, Radle-Hurst T. Analysis of circulating microRNAs in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot with and without heart failure. J Transl Med. 2017;15(1):156 10.1186/s12967-017-1255-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lai CT, Ng EK, Chow PC, Kwong A, Cheung YF. Circulating microRNA expression profile and systemic right ventricular function in adults after atrial switch operation for complete transposition of the great arteries. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013;13:73 10.1186/1471-2261-13-73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lai CTM, Ng EKO, Chow PC, Kwong A, Cheung YF. Circulating MicroRNA in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Eur J Clin Invest. 2017;47(8):574–82. 10.1111/eci.12778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li D, Ji L, Liu L, Liu Y, Hou H, Yu K, et al. Characterization of circulating microRNA expression in patients with a ventricular septal defect. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e106318 10.1371/journal.pone.0106318 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Amsallem M, Sweatt AJ, Aymami MC, Kuznetsova T, Selej M, Lu H, et al. Right Heart End-Systolic Remodeling Index Strongly Predicts Outcomes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Comparison With Validated Models. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(6). 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Amsallem M, Sternbach JM, Adigopula S, Kobayashi Y, Vu TA, Zamanian R, et al. Addressing the Controversy of Estimating Pulmonary Arterial Pressure by Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016;29(2):93–102. 10.1016/j.echo.2015.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Casares FM. A Simple Method for Optimization of Reference Gene Identification and Normalization in DNA Microarray Analysis. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2016;22:45–52. 10.12659/MSMBR.897644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vlachos IS, Kostoulas N, Vergoulis T, Georgakilas G, Reczko M, Maragkakis M, et al. DIANA miRPath v.2.0: investigating the combinatorial effect of microRNAs in pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Web Server issue):W498–504. 10.1093/nar/gks494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lkhagva B, Lin YK, Kao YH, Chazo TF, Chung CC, Chen SA, et al. Novel Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Modulates Cardiac Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and Inflammatory Cytokines in Heart Failure. Pharmacology. 2015;96(3–4):184–91. 10.1159/000438864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nural-Guvener HF, Zakharova L, Nimlos J, Popovic S, Mastroeni D, Gaballa MA. HDAC class I inhibitor, Mocetinostat, reverses cardiac fibrosis in heart failure and diminishes CD90+ cardiac myofibroblast activation. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2014;7:10 10.1186/1755-1536-7-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fomison-Nurse I, Saw EEL, Gandhi S, Munasinghe PE, Van Hout I, Williams MJA, et al. Diabetes induces the activation of pro-ageing miR-34a in the heart, but has differential effects on cardiomyocytes and cardiac progenitor cells. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(7):1336–49. 10.1038/s41418-017-0047-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Infante T, Forte E, Punzo B, Cademartiri F, Cavaliere C, Soricelli A, et al. Correlation of Circulating miR-765, miR-93-5p, and miR-433-3p to Obstructive Coronary Heart Disease Evaluated by Cardiac Computed Tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124(2):176–82. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.04.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang H, Zhao Y, Chen T, Liu G, He N, Hu H. MiR-371 promotes proliferation and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting PTEN. BMB Rep. 2019;52(5):312–7. 10.5483/BMBRep.2019.52.5.155 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li Q, Li Y, Zhang D, Gao H, Gao X. Downregulation of microRNA451 improves cell migration, invasion and tube formation in hypoxiatreated HUVECs by targeting MIF. Mol Med Rep. 2019;20(2):1167–77. 10.3892/mmr.2019.10357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhou X, Wen W, Shan X, Qian J, Li H, Jiang T, et al. MiR-28-3p as a potential plasma marker in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2016;138:91–5. 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bernardo BC, Gao XM, Winbanks CE, Boey EJ, Tham YK, Kiriazis H, et al. Therapeutic inhibition of the miR-34 family attenuates pathological cardiac remodeling and improves heart function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(43):17615–20. 10.1073/pnas.1206432109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Heng EL, Gatzoulis MA, Uebing A, Sethia B, Uemura H, Smith GC, et al. Immediate and Midterm Cardiac Remodeling After Surgical Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Adults With Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: A Prospective Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Clinical Study. Circulation. 2017;136(18):1703–13. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen W, Li S. Circulating microRNA as a Novel Biomarker for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Due to Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38(1):86–94. 10.1007/s00246-016-1487-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Silverman MG, Yeri A, Moorthy MV, Camacho Garcia F, Chatterjee NA, Glinge CSA, et al. Circulating miRNAs and Risk of Sudden Death in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(1):70–9. 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.08.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bilchick K, Kothari H, Narayan A, Garmey J, Omar A, Capaldo B, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces expression of inflammation-promoting genes related to interleukin-1beta in heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Reddy S, Hu DQ, Zhao M, Blay E Jr., Sandeep N, Ong SG, et al. miR-21 is associated with fibrosis and right ventricular failure. JCI Insight. 2017;2(9). 10.1172/jci.insight.91625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang A, Kwee LC, Grass E, Neely ML, Gregory SG, Fox KAA, et al. Whole blood sequencing reveals circulating microRNA associations with high-risk traits in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Atherosclerosis. 2017;261:19–25. 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.03.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zampetaki A, Kiechl S, Drozdov I, Willeit P, Mayr U, Prokopi M, et al. Plasma microRNA profiling reveals loss of endothelial miR-126 and other microRNAs in type 2 diabetes. Circ Res. 2010;107(6):810–7. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.226357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Girardot M, Pecquet C, Boukour S, Knoops L, Ferrant A, Vainchenker W, et al. miR-28 is a thrombopoietin receptor targeting microRNA detected in a fraction of myeloproliferative neoplasm patient platelets. Blood. 2010;116(3):437–45. 10.1182/blood-2008-06-165985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Li L, Zhu X, Shou T, Yang L, Cheng X, Wang J, et al. MicroRNA-28 promotes cell proliferation and invasion in gastric cancer via the PTEN/PI3K/AKT signalling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(3):4003–10. 10.3892/mmr.2017.8299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schneider C, Setty M, Holmes AB, Maute RL, Leslie CS, Mussolin L, et al. MicroRNA 28 controls cell proliferation and is down-regulated in B-cell lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(22):8185–90. 10.1073/pnas.1322466111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Espinosa-Diez C, Fierro-Fernandez M, Sanchez-Gomez F, Rodriguez-Pascual F, Alique M, Ruiz-Ortega M, et al. Targeting of Gamma-Glutamyl-Cysteine Ligase by miR-433 Reduces Glutathione Biosynthesis and Promotes TGF-beta-Dependent Fibrogenesis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2015;23(14):1092–105. 10.1089/ars.2014.6025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Grant JS, Morecroft I, Dempsie Y, van Rooij E, MacLean MR, Baker AH. Transient but not genetic loss of miR-451 is protective in the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulm Circ. 2013;3(4):840–50. 10.1086/674751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sahu N, Stephan JP, Cruz DD, Merchant M, Haley B, Bourgon R, et al. Functional screening implicates miR-371-3p and peroxiredoxin 6 in reversible tolerance to cancer drugs. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12351 10.1038/ncomms12351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Scrimgeour NR, Wrobel A, Pinho MJ, Hoydal MA. microRNA-451a prevents activation of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in human cardiomyocytes during pathological stress stimulation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020;318(1):C94–C102. 10.1152/ajpcell.00204.2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Su Z, Ni L, Yu W, Yu Z, Chen D, Zhang E, et al. MicroRNA-451a is associated with cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis in renal cell carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 2015;11(3):2248–54. 10.3892/mmr.2014.2957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang L, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Xiao X, et al. MicroRNA-433 Inhibits the Proliferation and Migration of HUVECs and Neurons by Targeting Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 Alpha. J Mol Neurosci. 2017;61(2):135–43. 10.1007/s12031-016-0853-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Robert W Dettman

31 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-18623

Circulating whole genome miRNA expression corresponds to progressive right ventricle enlargement and systolic dysfunction in adults with tetralogy of Fallot

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Weldy,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Both reviewers believed that your manuscript was interesting and could be successfully revised with additional work. Both reviewers agreed that a major problem with the data presented in the manuscript was the interpretation of the results based on the controls chosen. Different controls as well as MRI data was suggested as approaches that would strengthen your manuscript. Please also address the other comments raised by the reviewers. If additional time is required to complete the revisions, the journal is likely to extend the deadline below.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 14 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Robert W Dettman, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

[SR was supported by grants from the NIH K08 HL127277, U.S. Department of Defense PR151448, Reddy Foundation, and American Heart Association 16GRNT31200008. MA was supported by a Stanford Cardiovascular Institute – MHRCI seed grant.]

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

 [The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.]

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I enjoyed reading the manuscript by Welby et al "Circulating whole genome miRNA expression corresponds to progressive right ventricle enlargement and systolic dysfunction in adults with tetralogy of Fallot"

The field is very interesting and potentially of significant clinical importance.

Nevertheless there are significant limitations to be addressed:

1) Tetralogy of Fallot is a large spectrum diagnosis varying from VSD with some aortic overriding and pulmonary/infundibular stenosis to complete pulmonary atresia. How can the authors we sure miRNA expression is also not affected by these diagnostic differences? For examples 3 patients had a late repair indicating a different anatomical and physiological RV substrate compared to the other 17 patients

2) It is not clear whether this was a prospective study with a specific protocol and inclusion/exclusion criteria or a retrospective study. How were the patients recruited? Was this a follow up study where patients were recruited in the out patient clinic?

3) A major limitation is the lack of MRI data which is possibly considered the goal standard for evaluating RV volumetrics and functions.

4) The sample timing was also very confusing. What do the authors mean for clinically indicated TEE? Were these routine follow up echos or indicated by specific symptoms related to a significant lesion (pulmonary valve regurgitation, stenosis, conduit dysfunction, RVOT arrhythmias, significant TR, etc). How could the authors exclude the possibility that changes in miRNA expression are not related to residual haemodynamic lesions?

5) Myocardial miRNA 28-3p was also measured in adult control RV (60 yrs of age) and adolescents (14 yrs) with HLHS. I am not sure these 2 groups are comparable and representative. They could have used RV biopsies taken at the time of surgery in adult TOF patients undergoing pulmonary valve replacement.

6) A sample size calculation is required as it is very difficult to draw any significant conclusion for comparing such small group of patients.

Reviewer #2: This original article entitled “Circulating whole genome miRNA expression corresponds to progressive right ventricle enlargement and systolic dysfunction in adults with tetralogy of Fallot” describes the circulating miRNA profile in adult patients who had TOF operation. The authors focused on three miRNAs: 28-3p, 433-3p and 371-3p. At least two miRNA’s expression showed a correlation to the degree of RV failure.

Major:

1. This reviewer was not convinced that miRNA profile is directly caused by RV failure. Although there was a correlation between the degrees of change in miRNA expression to RV failure, the degrees of change in miRNA may be related to the general changes in the patients’ health condition.

2. The authors concluded that miRNA-28-3p expression is increased in RV due to congenital heart disease in children comparing miRNA-28-3p expression between control adult hearts and child hearts with RV failure due to hypoplastic LV (Figure 6). To this reviewer, the current experimental design cannot reach this conclusion unless the authors use the control (adult) normal hearts. Although the authors discussed the limitation of this experiment (line 407), the result didn’t add any information. This section should be eliminated.

3. The discussion is too long, stating in broad terms the functions of three miRNAs, such as inflammation, cell cycle etc. The discussion did not compare the current study with the previous studies demonstrating circulating miRNA profile in congenital heart diseases (there were several citations). Did the authors find similar or different results? In addition, the discussion is too speculative, and the miRNA profile may not be specific to RV failure after TOF operation.

Minor:

The data deposit of the miRNA profile was not clearly mentioned.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0241476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241476.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


1 Sep 2020

Dear Dr. Dettman and invited reviewers,

Thank you for your consideration and careful review of our manuscript titled "Circulating whole genome miRNA expression corresponds to progressive right ventricle enlargement and systolic dysfunction in adults with tetralogy of Fallot". Here we submit a significantly modified manuscript, along with responses to each of the thoughtful reviewer comments. We hope our modified manuscript sufficiently addresses the important concerns highlighted from the reviewers.

Reviewer concerns and responses:

Reviewer 1:

1) Tetralogy of Fallot is a large spectrum diagnosis varying from VSD with some aortic overriding and pulmonary/infundibular stenosis to complete pulmonary atresia. How can the authors we sure miRNA expression is also not affected by these diagnostic differences? For examples 3 patients had a late repair indicating a different anatomical and physiological RV substrate compared to the other 17 patients

Response: We agree with the reviewer that tetralogy of Fallot is a complex congenital heart disease where not all patients are identical. We recognize that by the nature of performing research with congenital heart disease patients, there will always be limitations given the wide variation in patient anatomy. However, once these patients have undergone surgical palliation, the anatomical differences are reduced. Following surgical palliation, all patients are at risk for pulmonary insufficiency and stenosis and subsequent right ventricular (RV) dilation and dysfunction. Therefore, our study has some advantages in that it is now comparing only post-surgical patients allowing for similar comparisons between right ventricular (RV) function. Because of this, despite prior differences in anatomy and timing of repair, we are now able to more closely compare the difference in RV function as the primary differing factor between these patients.

Of the 3 patients with late repair, 1 patient was in the “normal RV size” group, and 2 patients were in the “mild/moderate RV enlargement” group. That these patients did not lie entirely at one end of the spectrum of RV size and function (i.e. all in the “normal size” group or all in the “severe enlargement” group) is supportive that they are not unique outliers in their response to RV stress. This data on these 3 patients has now been added to the manuscript [Page 10, Line 236-238].

2) It is not clear whether this was a prospective study with a specific protocol and inclusion/exclusion criteria or a retrospective study. How were the patients recruited? Was this a follow up study where patients were recruited in the out patient clinic?

Response: In this study, we hypothesized that miRNA would be dysregulated in patients with TOF with varying RV size and function.

We defined a patient population as noted in inclusion criteria, and then recruited patients that fit that the inclusion criteria in a prospective manner in an outpatient setting. All patients with TOF are routinely followed on a yearly basis by their cardiologist since many are prone to pulmonary insufficiency and pulmonary stenosis and are at risk for RV failure. All blood samples were also collected during their outpatient clinic visit once they consented to the study. We have updated the methods section to clearly note our methods of sample collection [Page 6, Line 103 – 107].

3) A major limitation is the lack of MRI data which is possibly considered the goal standard for evaluating RV volumetrics and functions.

Response: We agree that cardiac MRI (cMRI) is the gold standard for evaluating RV size and function. There is currently no clearly defined criteria as to when and how frequently a patient with TOF following repair should undergo cMRI. While all patients who are being considered for pulmonary valve replacement undergo a cMRI, those with no RV dilation or mild to moderate dilation do not routinely undergo cMRI or undergo cMRI every 5 years. Therefore, many of our patients did not have a cMRI at the time of recruitment and blood samples collection. However, all patients had an echocardiogram at the time of recruitment and blood draw and therefore RV size and function by echocardiogram was used to correlate with circulating microRNA expression.

Of the 20 patients included in our study, 12 patients had a cMRI but there were only 4 patients where cMRI was done at or near the time of echocardiogram and blood draw and are included in the table below. The RVEDA (cm2), RVESA (cm2) and RVFAC (%) by echocardiogram were compared to the MRI RVEDV (ml), RVESV (ml) and RVEF (%) respectively. There is a strong and significant correlation between the echocardiogram and the cMRI assessment of RV size (measures of RVEDA or RVESA vs RVEDV or RVESV respectively: R=0.83, p<0.01) and a trend of association for measure of RV systolic function (RVFAC vs RVEF: R=0.77, p=0.22). We recognize that the lack of cMRI is a limitation but we show here that the echocardiograms also provide excellent insight into RV size and function at the time of blood draw and miRNA profile analysis. We have modified the discussion to further highlight the limitations in the lack of cMRI.

TTE Cardiac MRI

TTE Group RVEDA (cm2) RVESA (cm2) RVFAC RVEDV (ml) RVESV (ml) RVEF %

Mild/Mod 43 27 37 211 130 39

Mild/Mod 36 17 52 237 145 39

Mild/Mod 33 20 41 240 146 39

Severe 52 37 28 285 180 37

A paragraph in the methods section and results section has been added which addresses this concern:

Page 7, line 134-140. Cardiac MRI (cMRI) imaging was not available for all patients and therefore comparisons of RV size and function to miRNA signature based on cMRI were not performed. Of 20 patients recruited, 12 patients had a cMRI but there were only 4 patients where cMRI was done at or near the time of echocardiogram and blood draw (Supplemental Table 1). Therefore, assessment of RV size and function based on TTE imaging done at the time of blood sample collection was used. RV size and function by TTE was compared with the gold standard cMRI derived RV size and function in the 4 patients with recently available cMRI.

Page 10, line 243-248. The RVEDA (cm2), RVESA (cm2) and RVFAC (%) by echocardiogram were compared to the MRI RVEDV (ml), RVESV (ml) and RVEF (%) respectively in 4 patients where cMRI was available. There is a strong and significant correlation between the echocardiogram and the cMRI assessment of RV size (measures of RVEDA or RVESA vs RVEDV or RVESV respectively: R=0.83, p<0.01) and a trend of association for measure of RV systolic function (RVFAC vs RVEF: R=0.77, p=0.22) (Supplemental Table 1).

4) The sample timing was also very confusing. What do the authors mean for clinically indicated TEE? Were these routine follow up echos or indicated by specific symptoms related to a significant lesion (pulmonary valve regurgitation, stenosis, conduit dysfunction, RVOT arrhythmias, significant TR, etc). How could the authors exclude the possibility that changes in miRNA expression are not related to residual haemodynamic lesions?

Response: All patients with TOF are routinely followed on a yearly basis by their cardiologist since many are prone to pulmonary insufficiency and pulmonary stenosis and are at risk for RV failure. This yearly visit (which we are calling clinically indicated and not a research related visit) includes a symptom assessment, physical examination, electrocardiogram and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). This is the current national standard of care recommended by the American College of Cardiology. Patients were recruited during these visits if they met the inclusion criteria and blood samples were collected on the same day and correlated with the TTE performed also on that day. The TTEs were not performed for any specific symptoms but as part of routine care. We have now clarified this in the ‘Methods’ section.

We agree with the reviewer that the hemodynamic load leading to RV stress, in patients with no other organ system dysfunction is what is reflected in the circulating microRNA signature. Indeed, patients can have a similar degree of pulmonary insufficiency and RV stress by echocardiogram but have a different circulating microRNA signature which can further differentiate patients into those who many need earlier intervention. This would be an excellent clinical adjunct to TTEs and cMRIs for the cardiologist. We have now added this to the ‘Discussion’ section.

5) Myocardial miRNA 28-3p was also measured in adult control RV (60 yrs of age) and adolescents (14 yrs) with HLHS. I am not sure these 2 groups are comparable and representative. They could have used RV biopsies taken at the time of surgery in adult TOF patients undergoing pulmonary valve replacement.

Response: We agree that there are significant limitations to this comparison. In TOF, the majority of adults undergoing PVR do so for pulmonary insufficiency, where no muscle is routinely collected at the time of surgery. Samples such as that would be ideal, but unfortunately, we do not have access to such samples. We find our presented data quite intriguing given there is consistency between our peripheral blood data, prior mouse data evaluating RV failure, and our current evaluation of the RV from patients with HLHS. But, we agree that the limitations of this comparison are likely too great to overcome and may provide confusion to a reader. We will remove figure 6.

6) A sample size calculation is required as it is very difficult to draw any significant conclusion for comparing such small group of patients.

The reviewer brings up an important question regarding the size of the study performed. We address this limitation in our manuscript and highlight that this was an exploratory study. We do agree that multiple comparison testing with microRNA array data is crucial. Importantly, we address multiple comparison testing concerns with miRNA arrays by performing FDR calculation for analysis.

Reviewer 2:

1) This reviewer was not convinced that miRNA profile is directly caused by RV failure. Although there was a correlation between the degrees of change in miRNA expression to RV failure, the degrees of change in miRNA may be related to the general changes in the patients’ health condition.

Response: We agree with the reviewer that the degree of change in miRNA may be related to the general changes in the patients’ health condition and or RV failure. In order to address this important point, we recruited patients with similar cardiac and extracardiac organ system status. First, cardiac health status was similar between each of these 20 patients as assessed by NYHA classification (all patients with NYHA class I or II symptoms, no patient was in NYHA III or IV). Importantly, we wanted to exclude further factors such as renal failure or hepatic injury secondary to progressive RV failure. We reported in Table 1 the lab values of sodium, Cr, AST/ALT/Alk Phos, T bili, each of which were within normal limits and not different between groups. We also evaluated BMI, which was found to be similar between groups. Given this, these 20 patients appear from a clinical and laboratory standpoint to be quite similar. We acknowledge that other factors which may conceivably modify peripheral blood miRNA expression, such as exercise and diet, were not taken into account. This has now been included as a limitation to our study.

2) The authors concluded that miRNA-28-3p expression is increased in RV due to congenital heart disease in children comparing miRNA-28-3p expression between control adult hearts and child hearts with RV failure due to hypoplastic LV (Figure 6). To this reviewer, the current experimental design cannot reach this conclusion unless the authors use the control (adult) normal hearts. Although the authors discussed the limitation of this experiment (line 407), the result didn’t add any information. This section should be eliminated.

Response: We agree with the major limitations to presenting this data. As discussed above in response to a similar concern brought by reviewer 1, we will remove this data.

3) The discussion is too long, stating in broad terms the functions of three miRNAs, such as inflammation, cell cycle etc. The discussion did not compare the current study with the previous studies demonstrating circulating miRNA profile in congenital heart diseases (there were several citations). Did the authors find similar or different results? In addition, the discussion is too speculative, and the miRNA profile may not be specific to RV failure after TOF operation.

Response: We thank the reviewer for this comment. The discussion has been abbreviated and further emphasis on the comparison to the prior reported studies has been added. In general, the prior studies did not evaluate miRNA expression of the circulating cells, and the one prior study which included comparison of RV function had only 3 patients with heart failure, and had evaluated miRNA in whole blood. Therefore, it is not surprising that dysregulated miRNAs in their study were not replicated in ours.

We agree that it is difficult to fully know if a change in miRNA profile is specific to changes in the RV versus an alternative unmeasured factor. As noted above in response to review two’s question 1, we attempted to evaluate for other factors and highlight that in these 20 patients, they are largely similar in terms of clinical status and laboratory data. The miRNA profiles seem to be associated with changes in RV size and function. Future studies will focus on evaluating miRNA profile changes over time within individual patients which may help to answer these questions.

Updated text in discussion:

Page 17-18, Line 406-420 now reads as follows: We observed that global miRNA expression decreases with worsening RV enlargement. A similar finding has been seen in other reports evaluating miRNA signatures found in plasma of heart failure patients (1, 2) where the authors suggest that as patients develop worsening volume overload, a dilutional effect can lead to a reduction in measured plasma miRNA. Although this may play a role in miRNA measured in plasma, it seems less likely in the buffy coat. This reduction in total miRNA may lead to activation of a global mRNA transcriptional response to stress. Abu-Halima et al. (3) evaluated whole blood miRNA (circulating cells + plasma) in TOF patients with and without heart failure. They found a significant reduction in expression of miRNAs 421, 1233-3p, 625-5p in those with clinical heart failure, but was very limited in patient numbers and evaluation of RV size and function (TOF without HF: N = 34, TOF with HF: N = 3). Although our findings did not validate their specifically reported miRNA, our work does corroborate that peripheral blood miRNA expression changes in adults with TOF and identifies a linear relationship between miRNA expression and progressive RV enlargement and dysfunction prior to the development of clinical heart failure.

Minor:

The data deposit of the miRNA profile was not clearly mentioned.

Response: Data is in process of being uploaded onto GEO to be made publicly available.

REFERENCES

1. Watson CJ, Gupta SK, O'Connell E, Thum S, Glezeva N, Fendrich J, et al. MicroRNA signatures differentiate preserved from reduced ejection fraction heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17(4):405-15.

2. Bilchick K, Kothari H, Narayan A, Garmey J, Omar A, Capaldo B, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces expression of inflammation-promoting genes related to interleukin-1beta in heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2019.

3. Abu-Halima M, Meese E, Keller A, Abdul-Khaliq H, Radle-Hurst T. Analysis of circulating microRNAs in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot with and without heart failure. J Transl Med. 2017;15(1):156.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Weldy et al. miRNA and TOF Response FINAL.docx

Decision Letter 1

Robert W Dettman

16 Oct 2020

Circulating whole genome miRNA expression corresponds to progressive right ventricle enlargement and systolic dysfunction in adults with tetralogy of Fallot

PONE-D-20-18623R1

Dear Dr. Weldy,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Sorry for the delays, one of the reviewers had some issues.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Robert W Dettman, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have better highlighted the limitation of this study. Considering the population we are dealing with, I feel this study is clinically relevant and could potentially lead to a much bigger study.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Acceptance letter

Robert W Dettman

20 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-18623R1

Circulating whole genome miRNA expression corresponds to progressive right ventricle enlargement and systolic dysfunction in adults with tetralogy of Fallot

Dear Dr. Weldy:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr Robert W Dettman

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Weldy et al. miRNA and TOF Response FINAL.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES