Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Nov 2;33:106484. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106484

Quantitative assessment data of PAHs and N-PAHs in core sediments from the Niger Delta, Nigeria

Ihuoma N Anyanwu a,b,, Francis D Sikoki c, Kirk T Semple b
PMCID: PMC7658577  PMID: 33209968

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) pollution has been the focus of environmental research, mostly due to their mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, teratogenicity and genotoxicity. Concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and the nitrogen-containing analogues (N-PAHs) (which tend to accumulate in sediments rather than water) was measured in 2 cm intervals segments from Bonny Estuary, Niger Delta using GC–MS. Data showed that PAHs/N-PAHs levels ranged from 8699 to 22,528 µg/kg and 503–2020 µg/kg, respectively. Furthermore, the data revealed that ƩPAHs level in the estuarine segments was > 45% higher than DPR/EGASPIN intervention limit. This gives insight on PAHs/N-PAHs contamination in the oil rich region.

Keywords: PAHs, N-PAHs, Sediment cores, Niger Delta, Nigeria

Specifications Table

Subject area Environmental Science
More specific subject area Pollution
Type of data Figures, Tables.
How data was acquired GC–MS analysis (Thermo Trace GC Ultra- DSQ).
Data format Analysed, Raw.
Parameters of Data Collection Survey of PAHs and N-PAHs in core sediments from Bonny Estuary, Niger Delta.
Description of Data Collection Sediment samples were collected from 3 stations using Uwitec manufactured Plexiglas's tubes mounted on a triple sediment corer type 90 mm.
Data source location Niger Delta, Nigeria
Data accessibility Data available in the article
Related research article I.N. Anyanwu, F.D. Sikoki, K.T. Semple. Risk assessment of PAHs and N-PAH analogues in sediment cores from the Niger Delta, Mar. Pollut. Bull. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111684.

Value of Data

  • Data provides insight on PAHs/N-PAHs that exists in the Niger Delta environment.

  • The data could be useful to environmental scientists, toxicologists, limnologists and policy makers.

  • Data can be compared with other scientific manuscripts and/or be useful in future monitoring of sediment recovery.

  • Data revealed extent of PAHs/N-PAHs pollution and underground water contamination in the oil rich region.

1. Data Description

PAHs and N-PAHs are known to co-existence in contaminates sites, however, environmental analysis have focused majorly on PAHs [1], [2], [3], [4]. The data reported in this article is derived from sediment survey of PAHs and N-PAHs in Bonny Estuary, Niger Delta. The compiled GC–MS data analysis are included as Supplemental Material. In this study, Fig. 1 displays the LMW–ALKYL PAHs ranges (μg/kg) in core segments from Bonny Estuary, Niger Delta. The plot shows that low molecular weight PAHs contributed > 50% ƩPAHs measured in the estuarine sediments, with alkyl–PAHs recording high concentrations, while high molecular weight N-PAHs recorded > 60% N-PAHs measured in the estuary [5]. Also, underground well (used as control) recorded elevated concentrations of PAHs/N-PAHs [5]. Fig. 2 portrays the temporal flux of PAHs and N-PAHs (ng/cm2/yr) in core segments from Bonny Estuary, Niger Delta. The calculated flux revealed that low PAHs/N-PAHs load occurred in the 50 s and early 70 s; and high deposition in early 90 s to 2000s [5], [6], [7], [8]. Also, Table 1 describes the coordinates of sampling locations. The description of sampling locations is provided in Anyanwu et al. [5]. Furthermore, analytes, abbreviations, chemical formula, chemical structure and molecular mass; as well as; analyte list, abbreviations and detection limits are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The supplementary material provides the raw data relative to each individual repeat used to calculate the average, standard deviations and standard errors for Tables 4 and 5. The Tables which highlights the profiles of PAHs and N-PAHs in segment core samples from the Niger Delta, shows that ƩPAHs measured in the Estuary ranged from 16,635 µg/kg (0–2 cm) to 22,528 µg/kg (8–10 cm) (Table 4) and ƩN-PAHs ranged from 503 – 2020 µg/kg with B[a]A, dibenz-acridines and B[h]Q recording elevated values (Table 5). The mean concentrations of the measured chemicals and their toxic ratios are also recorded in Anyanwu et al. [5]. Interestingly, the data revealed that ƩPAHs concentrations in the estuary was > 45% higher than DPR/EGASPIN intervention limit [5].

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

LMW–ALKYL PAHs ranges (μg/kg) in core segments from Bonny Estuary, Niger Delta. Conc = concentration; LMW = Low Molecular Weight; ALKYL = Alkylated PAHs; BNN 1 = location 1; BNN 2 = location 2; BNN 3 = location 3. Y-axis depicts: 0 = control; –2 = 0–2 cm; –4 = 2–4 cm; –6 = 4–6 cm; –8 = 6–8 cm; –10 = 8–10 cm.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Temporal flux of PAHs and N-PAHs (ng/cm2/yr) in core segments from Bonny Estuary, Niger Delta. Y-axis depicts: 0 = control; –2 = 0–2 cm; –4 = 2–4 cm; –6 = 4–6 cm; –8 = 6–8 cm; –10 = 8–10 cm.

Table 1.

Description and coordinates of sampling locations.

Location Description Coordinates No of segment
BNN1 Station with no ongoing activity N 4°46′33.73′'E 7°00′.18.85′' 5
BNN2 Port Harcourt Harbour (shipping) N 4°46′02.43′' E 7°00′.10.56′' 5
BNN3 Area of Cement Bagging Factory N 4°45′71.13′' E 7°00′05.01′' 5

Table 2.

Analytes, abbreviations, chemical formula, chemical structure and molecular mass.

Analyte(s) (PAHs) Chem. formula Chem. Structure Mol. mass Analyte(s) Chem. formula Chem. structure Mol. mass
Naphthalene⁎⁎ (N0) C10H8 Image, table 2 128.1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene⁎⁎ (B[f]F) C20H12 Image, table 2 252.3
2-methyl-naphthalene (N1) C11H10 Image, table 2 142.2 Benzo[e]pyrene (B[e]P) C20H12 Image, table 2 252.3
1-methyl-naphthalene (N2) C11H10 Image, table 2 142.2 Benzo[a]pyrene⁎⁎ (B[a]P) C20H12 Image, table 2 252.3
Biphenyl (Bph) C12H10 Image, table 2 154.2 Perylene (Per) C20H12 Image, table 2 252.3
2,6-dimethyl-naphthalene (N3) C12H12 Image, table 2 156.2 Dibenz[ah] anthracene⁎⁎ (D[ah]A) C22H14 Image, table 2 278.3
Acenaphthylene⁎⁎ (Acl) C12H8 Image, table 2 152.2 Indeno[123-cd] pyrene⁎⁎ (ID) C22H12 Image, table 2 276.3
Acenphthene ⁎⁎ (Acc) C12H10 Image, table 2 154.2 Benzo[ghi]perylene⁎⁎ (B[ghi]P) C22H12 Image, table 2 276.3
2,3,6-trimethyl naphthalene (N4) C13H14 Image, table 2 170.2 N-PAHs
Fluorene⁎⁎ (F0) C13H10 Image, table 2 166.2 Quinoline٭ (Quin.) C9H7N Image, table 2 129.1
Phenanthrene⁎⁎ (P0) C14H10 Image, table 2 178.2 Isoquinoline (Isoquin.) C9H7N Image, table 2 129.1
Anthracene⁎⁎ (AN) C14H10 Image, table 2 178.2 Benzo[h]quinoline٭ (B[h]Q) C13H9N Image, table 2 179.2
1 methyl phenanthrene (P1) C15 H12 Image, table 2 192.2 1,7-Phenanthroline (1,7-Phen) C12H8N2 Image, table 2 180.2
Flouranthene⁎⁎ (FL) C16H10 Image, table 2 202.2 4,7-Phenanthroline (4,7-Phen) C12H8N2 Image, table 2 180.2
Pyrene⁎⁎ (PY) C16H10 Image, table 2 202.2 Benzo[a]acridine٭ (B[a]A) C17H11N Image, table 2 229.2
Benzo[a] anthracene⁎⁎ (B[aA) C18H12 Image, table 2 228.2 Dibenz[a,h]acridine٭ (D[ah]A) C21H13N Image, table 2 279.3
Chrysene⁎⁎ (C0) C18H12 Image, table 2 228.2 Dibenz[c,h]acridine٭ (D[ch]A) C21H13N Image, table 2 279.3
Benzo[b] fluoranthene⁎⁎ (B[b]F) C20H12 Image, table 2 252.3

16 EPA PAHs (⁎⁎); carcinogenic N-PAHs (٭).

Table 3.

Analyte list, abbreviations and detection limits.

PAHs Abbreviation IDL (ng/ml) MDL (µg/kg)
Naphthalene N0 0.1 25.7
2-methyl-naphthalene N2 0.1 3.8
1-methyl-naphthalene N1 0.3 ND
Biphenyl Bph 0.5 23.7
2,6-dimethylnaphthalene N3 0.9 46.2
Acenaphthylene Acl 1.9 33.8
Acenaphthene Ace 0.5 42.4
2,3,6-trimethyl-naphthalene N4 1.5 48.4
Flourene F0 1.3 32.3
Phenanthrene P0 0.7 29.3
Anthracene AN 0.2 41.1
1-methyl-phenanthrene P1 2.5 23.3
Flouranthene FL 0.1 24.5
Pyrene PY 0.6 27.4
Benzo[a]anthracene B[a]A 0.2 34.6
Chrysene C0 0.1 27.9
Benzo[b]flouranthene B[b]F 0.1 53.2
Benzo[k]flouranthene B[k]F 0.2 67.8
Benzo[e]pyrene B[e]P 0.1 20.7
Benzo[a]pyrene B[a]P 0.2 24.3
Perylene Per 0.2 36.1
Indeno[123-cd]pyrene ID 0.5 19.6
Dibenz[ah]anthracene D[h]A 1.5 11.8
Benzo[ghi]perylene B[ghi]P 0.5 13.6
N-PAHs
Quinoline Quin 0.8 48.6
Isoquinoline Isoquin 0.7 39.7
B[h]quinoline B[h]Q 5.9 61.5
1,7-phenanthroline 1,7-Phen 1.9 54.3
4,7-phenanthroline 4,7-Phen 2.9 70.3
Benzo[a]acridine B[a]A 0.2 82.2
Dibenz[ah]acridine D[ah]A 0.1 75.3
Dibenz[ch]acridine D[ch]A 0.2 76.1

IDL = instrument detection limit; MDL = method detection limit

Table 4.

Profiles of PAHs in segment core samples from the Niger Delta.

Control (µg/kg) BNN 1 (µg/kg)
BNN 2 (µg/kg)
BNN 3 (µg/kg)
PAHs 0 cm 0–2 cm 2–4 cm 4–6 cm 6–8 cm 8–10 cm 0–2 cm 2–4 cm 4–6 cm 6–8 cm 8–10 cm 0–2 cm 2–4 cm 4–6 cm 6–8 cm 8–10 cm
N0 157.6 ± 3.2 1085.4 ± 63.2 1251.6 ± 77.2 1155.8 ±128.1 1155.8 ± 47.0 1322.2 ± 11.4 1140.8 ± 47.1 668.4± 7.9 758.0± 28.9 674.8 ± 44.1 671.1 ± 56.8 760.7 ± 78.9 1304.4 ± 90.0 1129.6 ± 15.6 1205.0 ± 10.3 1475.7 ± 71.1
N2 7.3 ± 0.0 408.6 ± 12.7 478.7 ± 9.8 486.1 ± 13.8 596.6 ± 19.7 695.1 ± 14.0 300.7 ± 1.9 282.6± 3.2 267.9 ± 29.4 320.31 ± 22.5 912.69 ± 86.7 210.6 ± 11.6 301.2 ± 5.6 835.3 ± 38.1 993.9 ± 7.9 1410.5 ± 46.1
N1 64.9 ± 0.9 234.5 ± 14.4 339.1 ± 15.1 327.9 ± 25.9 345.8 ± 17.9 445.1 ± 14.1 485.2 ± 22.8 461.4 ± 8.9 490.5 ± 15.4 550.2 ± 9.8 1406.6 ± 12.3 487.2 ± 30.9 586.3 ± 44.4 1386.0 ± 12.4 1480.4 ± 69.5 2178.9 ± 22.6
Bph 46.5 ± 0.1 312.1 ± 2.9 373.8 ± 25.1 384.4 ± 24.9 466.0 ± 30.0 518.1 ± 17.8 285.9 ± 18.2 253.9± 4.8 372.5 ± 9.6 209.5 ± 15.5 442.8 ±48.6 140.8 ± 1.2 223.5 ± 12.4 272.2 ± 26.9 265.8 ± 18.1 442.1 ± 2.9
N3 220.9 ± 0.3 1532.7 ± 33.3 1665.4 ± 57.9 1579.3 ± 71.5 3460.4 ± 50.1 5463.9 ± 99.0 2031.8 ± 16.6 2118.2 ± 41.9 1320.3 ±48.7 2281.1 ± 78.9 10,069.1 ± 17.6 1370.0 ± 2.2 1289.8 ± 19.5 4064.1 ± 150.7 3748.4 ± 66.4 8148.5 ± 156.7
Acl 42.1 ± 0.1 76.8 ± 0.6 91.3 ± 3.9 86.7 ± 2.7 99.6 ± 4.5 99.6 ± 1.0 55.8 ± 3.1 67.8 ± 6.1 167.5 ± 63.9 62.7 ± 3.6 104.7 ± 0.4 174.5 ± 3.9 93.4 ± 1.9 113.9 ± 4.9 159.4 ± 5.4 247.8 ± 7.7
Acc 108.9± 0.8 340.0 ± 2.4 431.1 ± 41.4 462.8 ± 19.6 573.4 ± 22.2 586.5 ± 2.6 374.6 ± 24.2 345.1 ± 2.7 381.1 ± 20.1 283.3 ± 10.1 523.6 ± 36.8 281.1 ± 36.8 378.5 ± 26.5 418.3 ± 35.2 275.1 ± 150.8 848.2 ± 34.8
N4 736.3 ± 1.0 1218.5 ± 65.1 1314.0 ± 1.0 1181.8 ± 29.4 1611.6 ± 55.2 2080.2 ± 69.5 587.6 ± 17.9 587.8 ± 22.9 619.0 ± 49.4 522.7 ± 74.8 3199.7 ± 281.3 5721.7 ± 171.5 663.9 ± 16.9 811.3 ± 62.5 1166.2 ± 64.3 2731.5 ± 54.2
F0 228.8 ± 3.6 356.3 ± 8.6 339.2 ± 23.4 433.2 ± 11.7 569.8 ± 19.1 541.3 ± 30.4 396.5 ± 25.8 346.2 ± 17.1 414.7 ± 1.3 326.3 ± 10.1 904.4 ± 9.6 483.2 ± 2.4 574.9 ± 11.9 630.8 ± 37.9 752.1 ± 2.2 126.3 ± 19.1
P0 1232.4 ± 4.1 603.6 ± 6.0 409.3 ± 0.7 655.1 ± 16.0 665.2 ± 2.0 566.5 ± 43.3 996.6 ± 19.8 733.0 ± 13.2 974.7 ± 9.2 667.6 ± 24.1 1085.1± 21.9 2347.9 ± 141.6 1409.9 ± 23.2 1696.0 ± 12.2 1546.2 ± 42.1 1997.3 ± 105.0
AN 151.4 ± 0.7 288.7 ± 15.2 297.4 ± 0.1 334.3 ± 16.1 333.7 ± 2.6 308.7± 17.1 206.6 ± 5.8 192.1 ± 15.7 279.9 ± 7.6 193.7 ± 1.4 170.4 ± 0.8 210.7 ± 1.1 152.3 ± 21.1 88.2 ± 2.8 174.6 ± 1.0 180.5 ± 13.8
P1 151.5 ± 0.3 629.4 ± 51.9 586.2 ± 5.2 601.8 ± 2.8 570.1 ± 11.7 533.0 ± 2.0 446.9 ± 46.9 279.3 ± 4.9 500.1 ± 22.6 316.0 ± 5.9 537.4 ± 15.9 651.6 ± 95.8 546.8 ± 23.7 443.4 ± 9.6 318.6 ± 15.9 417.8 ± 1.9
FL 331.4 ± 0.5 525.3 ± 6.4 521.9 ± 30.2 578.2 ± 62.4 537.8 ± 9.8 568.8 ± 1.0 386.3 ± 37.4 481.1 ± 17.1 1030.9 ± 56.3 312.8 ± 13.0 339.2 ± 31.9 415.5 ± 47.1 277.0 ± 0.8 245.7 ± 9.9 216.9 ± 35.2 229.9 ± 20.9
PY 295.6 ± 0.7 731.1 ± 18.5 731.7 ± 14.1 820.7 ± 38.5 764.7 ± 10.6 813.1 ± 11.4 553.1 ± 49.6 671.4 ± 15.4 1324.3 ± 43.0 475.8 ± 20.9 521.4 ± 35.6 516.1 ± 55.2 473.8 ± 2.5 314.9 ± 0.7 241.4 ± 22.6 304.3 ± 60.9
B[a]A 38.9 ± 0.5 817.6 ± 52.7 866.6 ± 27.2 1200.1 ± 22.7 836.5 ± 24.4 964.5 ± 5.5 508.6 ± 84.7 1091.1 ± 34.7 1711.2 ± 26.8 424.6 ± 15.7 582.2 ± 36.7 399.9 ± 44.1 372.8 ± 2.7 213.6 ± 1.1 198.2 ± 7.7 233.8 ± 7.7
C0 56.9 ± 0.1 795.3 ± 65.7 784.9 ± 11.7 1069.5 ± 60.3 785.3 ± 31.8 905.0 ± 5.4 598.7 ± 41.4 144.1 ± 17.7 275.9 ± 20.9 63.9 ± 9.4 88.4 ± 2.4 355.7 ± 34.6 331.27 ± 10.7 192.1 ± 3.6 171.6 ± 1.9 194.9 ± 4.5
B[b]F 336.6 ± 1.4 1568.7 ± 113.4 1623.1 ± 76.7 2115.6 ± 48.1 1532.4 ± 22.7 1663.8 ± 52.1 336.5 ± 33.4 204.3 ± 12.6 1470.7 ± 52.1 298.5 ± 10.8 127.9 ± 4.1 1189.9 ± 65.6 741.0 ± 30.3 697.1 ± 1.8 884.7 ± 44.6 527.2 ± 1.1
B[k]F 410.1 ± 0.1 1990.8 ± 14.8 2000.7 ± 15.3 2485.2 ± 4.3 1767.4 ± 13.2 2021.5 ± 46.0 221.2 ± 81.2 673.5 ± 68.9 1068.7 ± 42.3 303.9 ± 57.9 483.3 ± 87.5 304.3 ± 23.2 241.1 ± 2.9 156.0 ± 0.2 195.8 ± 0.6 279.4 ± 15.0
B[e]P 35.8 ± 0.1 158.3 ± 10.0 173.5 ± 0.1 188.6 ± 5.1 160.7 ± 3.1 164.9 ± 4.1 120.4 ± 2.2 129.9 ± 1.5 175.5 ± 13.7 83.6 ± 1.5 127.9 ± 5.2 35.1 ± 3.5 45.0 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.0 67.2 ± 0.6 68.7 ± 3.9
B[a]P 59.5 ± 0.1 113.6 ± 3.9 123.4 ± 4.8 190.1 ± 1.1 120.1 ± 3.5 127.7 ± 0.8 130.7 ± 6.6 206.7 ± 13.5 386.6 ± 10.7 134.2 ± 4.7 128.2 ± 1.7 343.5 ± 43.6 101.8 ± 1.2 160.1 ± 1.6 216.5 ± 23.7 243.1 ± 5.9
Per 25.7 ± 0.1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
D[ah]A 10.2 ± 0.2 51.9± 1.1 32.2 ± 0.2 51.2 ± 2.2 49.8 ± 1.0 39.5 ± 4.5 31.1 ± 0.8 34.1 ± 0.4 109.4 ± 0.4 26.7 ± 1.1 31.6 ± 0.7 64.5 ± 1.3 32.8 ± 0.1 26.1 ± 0.6 54.0 ± 0.4 79.8 ± 0.8
ID 43.6 ± 0.1 219.7 ± 11.4 258.4 ± 19.3 311.4 ± 25.1 244.1 ± 2.4 246.3 ± 1.2 132.6 ± 3.9 203.8 ± 1.7 294.0 ± 6.9 80.2 ± 6.1 111.5 ± 3.4 99.2 ± 1.6 72.9 ± 1.8 42.7 ± 1.5 65.8 ± 0.6 94.0 ± 2.4
B[ghi]P 39.1 ± 0.1 301.1 ± 5.5 332.3 ± 1.5 363.1 ± 3.9 285.4 ± 4.7 306.8 ± 8.1 130.0 ± 4.1 249.0 ± 46.0 275.5 ± 3.5 87.1 ± 0.4 125.6 ± 3.1 72.2 ± 0.7 53.7 ± 3.9 27.7 ± 0.5 39.2 ± 1.6 68.6 ± 1.9
∑PAHs (µg/kg) 4824.7 14,360.0 15,025.8 17,062.9 17,532.2 20,982.1 10,458.2 10,424.8 14,668.9 8699.5 22,694.8 16,635.9 10,268.1 13,965.1 14,437.0 22,528.8
∑PAHs (mg/kg) 4.8 85.0 67.0 77.8
DPR / EGASPIN Interv. Limit (mg/kg) 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0

Values = mean ± SE.

ND = PAHs not detected during analysis.

DPR = Department of Petroleum Resources.

EGASPIN = Environmental Guidelines and Standards for the Petroleum Industry in Nigeria.

Table 5.

Profiles of N-PAHs in segment core samples from the Niger Delta.

Control (µg/kg) BNN 1 (µg/kg)
BNN 2 (µg/kg)
BNN 3 (µg/kg)
N-PAHs 0 cm 0–2 cm 2–4 cm 4–6 cm 6–8 cm 8–10 cm 0–2 cm 2–4 cm 4–6 cm 6–8 cm 8–10 cm 0–2 cm 2–4 cm 4–6 cm 6–8 cm 8–10 cm
Quin* 43.8 ± 0.0 49.0 ± 0.1 49.7 ± 0.10 49.8 ± 0.4 50.3 ± 0.1 51.4 ± 0.5 54.5 ± 4.7 50.7 ± 1.1 168.6 ± 70.5 68.3 ± 19.4 49.8 ± 0.1 167.5 ± 70.8 96.4 ± 0.3 96.9 ± 0.1 167.7 ± 70.5 167.6 ± 71.2
Isoquin 34.6 ± 0.1 39.3 ± 0.0 39.5 ± 0.0 39.3 ± 0.2 39.7 ± 0.3 39.8 ± 0.1 42.9 ± 3.4 40.4 ± 1.0 136.7 ± 58.5 55.2 ± 15.8 39.4 ± 0.1 136.5 ± 58.6 78.2 ± 0.1 78.4 ± 0.0 136.8 ± 58.5 137.1 ± 58.8
B[h]Q* 63.3 ± 0.3 93.1 ± 1.0 95.6 ± 1.7 101.3 ± 0.5 104.1 ± 2.0 96.8 ± 1.0 76.5 ± 6.5 70.6 ± 2.0 221.5 ± 90.8 95.0 ± 24.0 67.1 ± 0.0 219.0 ± 90.8 128.9 ± 0.8 124.2 ± 0.2 214.4 ± 90.5 213.4 ± 90.8
1,7-Phen 43.9 ± 0.4 51.0 ± 0.0 50.6 ± 0.1 50.2 ± 0.9 56.3 ± 0.1 52.5 ± 0.6 57.6 ± 4.7 54.0 ± 1.0 185.2 ± 79.1 73.9 ± 21.8 53.0 ± 0.2 184.9 ± 78.8 105.8 ± 0.1 106.7 ± 0.3 186.5 ± 79.7 187.7 ± 80.3
4,7-Phen 65.6 ± 0.1 81.8 ± 0.0 81.7 ± 0.6 86.5 ± 5.9 82.7 ± 2.0 83.6 ± 0.3 77.4 ± 5.8 72.9 ± 1.6 241.1 ± 101.5 99.0 ± 27.9 72.4 ± 0.1 242.6 ± 103.2 139.2 ± 0.0 138.6 ± 0.1 241.8 ± 102.6 241.4 ± 103.9
B[a]A* 75.7 ± 0.6 93.8 ± 3.0 101.3 ± 1.0 98.3 ± 2. 99.4 ± 0.6 98.0 ± 1.3 88.3 ± 7.5 85.1 ± 1.9 330.0 ± 67.8 114.1 ± 31.8 81.5 ± 0.2 329.2 ± 69′8 160.9 ± 0.2 159.2 ± 0.1 376.8 ± 18.6 376.3 ± 18.7
D[ah]A* 68.1 ± 1.2 72.9 ± 0.0 72.8 ± 0.1 77.9 ± 0.0 72.9 ± 0.0 73.0 ± 0.3 85.3 ± 7.5 75.3 ± 1.6 304.4 ± 58.8 101.9 ± 29.6 72.4 ± 0.0 303.1 ± 57.6 144.7 ± 0.0 145.1 ± 0.2 302.2 ± 57.8 352.4 ± 8.2
D[ch]A* 66.9 ± 0.4 72.7 ± 0.6 72.5 ± 0.3 77. ± 0.7 72.3 ± 0.7 71.9 ± 0.3 80.5 ± 5.2 74.5 ± 1.8 297.9 ± 53.9 100.0 ± 28.0 72.6 ± 1.8 298.0 ± 56.2 140.4 ± 0.1 140.2 ± 0.0 295.0 ± 55.0 344.9 ± 5.0
∑N-PAHs (µg/kg) 461.9 553.6 563.7 503.3 577.7 567.0 563.0 523.5 1885.4 707.4 508.2 1880.8 994.5 989.3 1921.2 2020.8
∑NPAHs (mg/kg) 0.5 2.8 4.2 7.8
٭

= carcinogenic N-PAHs (IARC, 2012; 2013).

Values = mean ± SE.

2. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample collection

Sample collection was as described in Anyanwu et al. [5]. In brief, sediment cores (10 cm long) were collected from 3 stations in Bonny Estuary using Uwitec manufactured Plexiglas's tubes mounted on a triple sediment corer (Table 1), and sliced into 2 cm layers. Due to high pollution in the estuary and the surrounding waters, sediment sample was collected from an underground community well (drinking well) in the area to serve as control. Following collection and segmentation, samples were taken to the laboratory, oven dried at 50 °C, homogenised, sieved with 2 mm mesh size, stored in a container and transported to United Kingdom, where they were stored at 4 °C until analysis [5].

2.2. Chemicals

Chemical standards (PAH and N-PAH) were purchased from Thames Restek and Sigma-Aldrich, UK, respectively. Internal standard D9-acridine was purchased from Cambridge Isotopes Laboratories, UK. HPLC grade acetonitrile, methanol and ethyl-acetate were used for the analysis. Calibration curves were performed at ten levels ranging from 2.5 to 2500 ng/ml for PAHs and six ranging from100 to 2000 ng/ml for N-PAHs in ethyl acetate. Accepted linearity was obtained in all calibrations (r2 >0.99). The measured compounds are listed in Tables 2 and 3 [5].

2.3. Extraction procedure and GC–MS analysis/quantification

Sample extractions and GC–MS quantification was as reported in Anyanwu et al. [5]. In brief, 1–2 g sediments, mixed with 2 g anhydrous sodium sulphate NaSO4, was weighed into pre-conditioned extraction thimble (after conditioning for 4 h) and extracted in a Soxhlet device for 18 h using 300 ml solvent mixture of ACN/MeOH (8:2). Extract was concentrated to 1 ml (Büchi Rotavap R-144). Clean-up was performed over a 5 mm glass column containing 6 g of 2% water deactivated aluminium-oxide, topped with 1 g NaSO4 (all baked overnight at 450 °C) [1, 4]. The column was conditioned with 50 ml ACN/MeOH (8:2) and elution was with 50 ml ACN/MeOH (8:2). Elutes were rotary evaporated, solvent exchanged with ethyl-acetate and concentrate to 1 ml. Internal standard (D9-acridine) was added and samples were stored in the freezer until analysis with GC–MS. GC–MS analysis was performed with Thermo Trace GC Ultra- DSQ. ZB–Semi-Volatile column 30 m ˟ 0.25 mm ˟ 0.25 µm (Phenomenex, USA) was used. Scan acquisition was performed by selected ion monitoring (SIM) [5]. Data obtained from GC–MS analysis was used to derive the figures. The LMW PAHs/N-PAHs are 2- to 3-rings while, HMW group are 4- to 6-rings. Temporal flux was calculated according to Zaborska [7].

Authors contributions

FDS: Sample collection. INA: Methodology, Laboratory analysis, Writing original draft, Review and Editing. KTS: Supervision, Review and Editing of first draft.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing interests.

Acknowledgement

The research was sponsored by Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF), Nigeria (PTDF/E/OSS/PHD/INA/299/10). We also thank the Centre for Marine Pollution Monitoring and Seafood Safety, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria for providing sediment corer and assistance during sample collection.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.106484.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.xlsx (40.4KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.Anyanwu I.N., Semple K.T. Biodegradation of phenanthrene-nitrogen-containing analogues in soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015;226:1–10. b. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anyanwu I.N., Semple K.T. Phytotoxicity of phenanthrene and its nitrogen polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon analogues in ageing soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015;226:347. c. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Anyanwu I.N., Clifford O.I., Semple K.T. Effects of single, binary and quinary mixture of phenanthrene and its N-PAHs on Eisenia fetida in soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017;228:105. a. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anyanwu I.N., Semple K.T. Effects of phenanthrene and its nitrogen-containing analogues aged in soil on earthworm Eisenia fetida. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016;105:151–159. b. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anyanwu I.N., Sikoki F.D., Semple K.T. Risk assessment of PAHs and N-PAH analogues in sediment cores from the Niger Delta. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111684. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.UNEP . United Nations Environment Programme; Nairobi: 2011. Environmental Assessment of Ogoniland; p. 257.http://www.unep.org/nigeria [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zaborska A. Anthropogenic lead concentrations and sources in Baltic Sea sediments based on lead isotopic composition. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014;85:99–113. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Omokheyeke O., Sikoki F., Abdelmourhit L. Applying sediment cores and nuclear techniques for pollution assessment in the Bonny/new Calabar River Estuary, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Poster presented at the 23rd WiN Global Annual Conference: Women in Nuclear meet Atoms for Peace Programme and Women in Nuclear Global, c/o World Nuclear Association Tower House, London WC2E 7HA (United Kingdom); International Atomic Energy Agency; Vienna (Austria); Aug 2015. p. 30. p. 158; WiN-2015: 23. WiN Global Annual Conference: Women in Nuclear meet Atoms for Peace; Vienna (Austria); 24-28 Aug 2015; WIN-2015–058; Available online at. Poster presentation. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xlsx (40.4KB, xlsx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES