Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2020 Oct 29;5(44):28889–28896. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04571

Targeting Delivery Nanocarriers for (+)-Terrein to Enhance Its Anticancer Effects

Yao-Yao Jiang †, Feng-Li Yuan †, Jin-Wen Li ‡, Hong-E Wu †, Mei-Yan Wei †, Chang-Lun Shao †,§, Ming Liu †,§,*, Guan-Hai Wang ‡,∥,*
PMCID: PMC7659136  PMID: 33195942

Abstract

graphic file with name ao0c04571_0011.jpg

As a compound from marine fungi, (+)-terrein showed significant anticancer activity. In this study, (+)-terrein was extracted from the marine-derived fungus and showed significant cytotoxicity against cancer cells, especially in A549 cells. To enhance its anticancer effects, redox-responsive nanocarriers based on folic acid-chitosan decorating the mesoporous silica nanoparticles were designed to control (+)-terrein target delivery into cancer cells. (+)-Terrein was loaded in the holes, and folic acid-chitosan worked as a gatekeeper by disulfide linkage controlling (+)-terrein release in the tumor microenvironment. The (+)-terrein drug delivery systems exhibited cytotoxicity toward A549 cells through induction of apoptosis. The apoptosis effect was confirmed by the increase in the expression of cleaved caspase-3, caspase-9, and PARP. Taken together, this work evaluates for the first time the (+)-terrein delivery system and provides a promising nanomedicine platform for (+)-terrein.

1. Introduction

Cancer is now one of the most serious diseases all over the world. The search for new effective chemotherapeutic drugs for cancer therapy has always been in focus. Natural products have been proven to be rich sources of structurally novel and biologically active compounds, and they have become one of the major chemical entities for drug discovery.1,2 (+)-Terrein is a natural product, first isolated from Aspergillus terreus,3,4 which shows diverse biological activities,5−9 such as inhibition of platelet aggregation, enhancement of osteoblast biocompatibility on the titanium surface, antimelanogenesis, and anti-inflammation, antimicrobial, and antiproliferation properties. It has been reported that (+)-terrein could efficiently inhibit cell proliferation in many kinds of human cancer cells, such as keratinocytes, hepatoma cells, and lung and ovarian cancer cells.10 Notably, (+)-terrein also significantly inhibits the growth of drug-resistant breast cancer cells with an IC50 value of 1.1 nM (positive control paclitaxel was 0.1 μM).11 Some in vivo results also showed that (+)-terrein could suppress the angiogenin expression to exert the antiproliferation effect and antiangiogenesis effect in head and neck cancer.12 Unfortunately, like some natural compounds, (+)-terrein has poor water solubility (below 0.1 g/L), which limits the direct applications in vivo. Moreover, the inevitable side effects on the normal cells will be caused due to the nontargeted delivery.10,13,14

In recent years, drug delivery systems (DDSs) have gained substantial interest in cancer therapy, due to their ability to enhance bioavailability, improve therapeutic efficacy, minimize unwanted side effects, provide sustained release of drugs, reduce drug degradation, and direct the accumulation of loaded drugs to the desired disease sites.14−17 However, up to now, there is no specific DDS for (+)-terrein to enhance the target delivery and reduce the side effects.

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have attracted considerable attention because of their specific advantages, including tunable pore structures, multi-functionalization, and good stability.18−20 The multi-functionalized DDSs based on MSNs have been explored in vitro or in vivo. In our previous works, we have prepared a series of DDS based on MSNs to encapsulate the drugs and siRNA in cancer therapy.21,22 As an effective DDS, drugs or gene molecules can be encapsulated in the hole of core and then decorated the surface by polymers or nanoparticles to form “gatekeeper.” The decorations in the MSN surface can be cleaved and shed in response to the tumor microenvironment, and the drug or gene can be released inside cancer cells.23,24

In this work, chitosan functionalized by folic acid decorated the MSN surface by a disulfide linker and fabricated redox-responsive DDS to control and enhance (+)-terrein targeting delivery. In the tumor microenvironment, the disulfide bonds can be cleaved and chitosan is deshielded to control the (+)-terrein release in tumor cells. The growth inhibition and cytotoxicity of (+)-terrein DDS were investigated, and the possible apoptotic mechanisms were evaluated in A549 human cancer cell line.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Cytotoxic Activity of (+)-Terrein

The cytotoxicity of (+)-terrein was evaluated against different cancer cells. As shown in Table 1, (+)-terrein exhibited cytotoxicity against H1975, K562, DU145, A549, H411, and MCF-7 cell lines. Compared with the other cancer cells, A549 cell line was more sensitive to (+)-terrein, and the representative IC50 curve is shown in Figure 1. A549 cell line is known to harbor KRAS mutation and LKB1 inactivating mutations, which could accelerate energy consumption, destroy intracellular components, and ultimately induce rapid cell apoptosis, leading to A549 cells showing a high sensitivity to the effect of (+)-terrein (Figure 1). In the following studies, A549 cell line was selected to evaluate the properties of (+)-terrein DDS.

Table 1. Cytotoxic Activity of (+)-Terrein.

cell lines type IC50 (μg/mL)
H1975 human adenocarcinoma non-small cell lung cancer 7.55
K562 human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell 7.11
DU145 human prostate cancer cell 4.63
A549 human adenocarcinoma alveolar basal epithelial cells 3.32
H441 human distal lung epithelial cell 7.55
MCF-7 human breast cancer 7.11

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Inhibition rate (%) of (+)-terrein in A549 cells. A549 cells were treated with various concentrations of (+)-terrein for 72 h and then subjected to the MTT assay. Values were expressed as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.

2.2. Preparation and Characterization of (+)-Terrein Nanocarriers

To effectively control the (+)-terrein release in cancer cells, chitosan was used to decorate the nanocarriers. Chitosan chains were anchored on the surface of nanoparticles via disulfide linkers and fabricated an effective gatekeeper to encapsulate the (+)-terrein molecules inside the holes. The morphology and distribution of nanocarriers were studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and particle size analysis. As seen in Figure 2A1, the MSN-ss-COOH particles have an average diameter of ∼100 nm with uniform pore size. After being decorated by chitosan, the nanoshell was appeared around the MSN-ss-folic acid-functionalized chitosan (FCS) nanoparticles, and the particle size was increased to 110 ± 23 nm (n = 300) (Figure 2B1). Compared to unmodified MSNs, MSNs modified by chitosan can disperse in water and form stable colloid solution. Dynamic laser light scattering was used to test the particle dispersity in water. The results showed that the polydispersity index was decreased from 0.359 to 0.182 after being covered by chitosan, indicating that the polymer decoration of nanoparticles helped to disperse in the aqueous solution (Figure 2A2,B2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

TEM images and particle size analysis of MSN-ss-COOH (A) and MSN-ss-FCS (B).

The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of the MSN-ss-COOH and MSN-ss-FCS are shown in Figure 3A. Compared with MSN-ss-COOH, 1555 and 1660 cm–1 new peaks appeared in MSN-ss-FCS, which were attributed to N–H asymmetric bending vibration and acylamino groups in the chitosan, respectively. The results of zeta potential also indicated that the chitosan chains were grafted in the surface of nanoparticles. The zeta potential (Figure 3B) was changed from −18.12 ± 1.96 to 26.71 ± 2.12 mV after being decorated by chitosan.25,26 Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed to investigate the amount of grafted chitosan derivatives. As shown in Figure 3C, the weight losses of MSN-ss-COOH and MSN-ss-FCS were 23.6 and 62.6% at 700 °C, respectively. The amount of grafted chitosan was about 36.6%. Moreover, the results of nitrogen physisorption (Figure 3D) showed that MSN-ss-COOH exhibit the typical IV behavior for a well-developed meso-structure with a sharp adsorption step at the 0.1–0.3 relative pressure (P/P0) range.27 Compared with MSN-ss-COOH, the adsorption step was not so steep compared with MSN seeds, and the inflection point of the step shifted to somewhat lower P/P0 in the case of MSN-ss-FCS, indicating that the pore channels were blocked by chitosan chains. Through the above results and analyses, chitosan chains have been successfully conjugated in the surface of nanoparticles by disulfide bonds. Moreover, the retained mesoporosity can potentially provide space for further functionalization.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Characterization of MSN before and after polymer coating procedures: FTIR spectra (A), zeta potential (B), TGA (C), and nitrogen adsorption isotherms (D).

2.3. (+)-Terrein Release In Vitro

We investigated the redox-responsive release of (+)-terrein in the presence of reduced glutathione (GSH) (Figure 4). To simulate the microenvironment in vivo, 10 mM (cancer cell microenvironment) and 10 μM (blood microenvironment) of GSH were used to trigger the (+)-terrein release. It showed that (+)-terrein release was fast in the beginning of 6 h in the presence of 10 mM of GSH. After 24 h of an in vitro assay, more than 80% (+)-terrein was released. In contrast, the rate of (+)-terrein release was remarkably slowed in the presence of 10 μM of GSH. The cumulative release of the total amount of (+)-terrein was much lower than the cumulative release in the presence of 10 mM of GSH. Compared to Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS nanocarriers, the release behavior of (+)-terrein from Terrein@MSN-FCS nanocarriers was not obviously different between 10 μM and 10 mM of GSH solution. As shown in the results of the redox-sensitivity study, GSH can rapidly cleave the disulfide bonds and lead to shed the end-capping CS molecules from the surfaces of MSN-ss-CS nanoparticles. This leaded to a free diffusion of drugs through the MSN channels. These results indicated that GSH could rapidly cleave the disulfide bonds among MSNs and chitosan chains and trigger the (+)-terrein release from nanocarriers.28

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Release behavior of (+)-terrein from Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS and Terrein@MSN-FCS nanocarriers in the presence of different concentrations of GSH (10 μM and 10 mM).

We also evaluated the intracellular release behaviors of (+)-terrein-loaded MSNs in A549 cells by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Because of the lack of own fluorescence, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-replaced (+)-terrein was used as a tracer to monitor cellular accumulation qualitatively in MSN-ss-FCS and MSN-CS nanoparticles. As shown in Figure 5A, green fluorescence was obviously observed in the surroundings of the cell nucleus (blue fluorescence). The fluorescence intensity of MSN-FCS nanoparticles was also evaluated by CLSM. As shown in the Figure 5B, weak green fluorescence intensity was observed in the cells, illustrating that MSN-ss-FCS nanoparticles were efficiently internalized and released FITC inside cells. FITC could not be effectively released from MSN-CP nanoparticles. These results indicated that GSH could rapidly cleave the disulfide bonds among MSNs and chitosan chains and trigger the (+)-terrein release from nanocarriers. In blood circulation, the nanocarriers could remain stable and avoid the premature (+)-terrein release. Once the nanocarriers enter the tumor tissue, the high concentration of GSH (over 10 mM) could cleave the disulfide bonds and trigger the (+)-terrein release in cancer cells.29,30 These results were also consistent with the results of (+)-terrein release in vitro.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

CLSM images of A549 cells incubated with FITC@MSN-ss-FCS (A) and FITC@MSNs-CS (B) for 2 h, respectively. Green fluorescence was represented for FITC. Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue). Scale bars indicate 20 μm.

2.4. Cytotoxic Activity of (+)-Terrein DDS

The in vitro cytotoxic effect of Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS and other formulations was assessed by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) method. As shown in Figure 6A, after 24 h incubation, Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS showed obvious cytotoxicity to A549 cells. The obtained inhibition rates of Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS nanocarriers were 13.14, 29.08, and 57.03% at the (+)-terrein concentration of 3, 6, and 12 μg/mL, respectively. The IC50 value was 10.84 μg/mL. These results approached or briefly exceeded the cytotoxicity of free (+)-terrein (IC50 = 9.97 μg/mL), suggesting that the decorated polymer chains were able to break away from the particle surface in response to the cancer microenvironment, and the loaded (+)-terrein was released in cancer cells. In comparison, the inhibition rates of Terrein@MSN-FCS nanocarriers (without disulfide bonds) were 5.84, 22.88, and 41.60% at the (+)-terrein concentration of 3, 6, and 12 μg/mL, respectively, which were significantly lower than the cytotoxicity of Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS and free (+)-terrein, indicating that the decorated polymer chains were tightly anchored at the particle surface and prevented the intracellular release of (+)-terrein. To further confirm the cytotoxicity of Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS, the clone formation test was employed. A549 cells were incubated with Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS for 7 days, and the clone formation of A549 cells were effectively inhibited at the 2.5 and 5 μg/mL of (+)-terrein (Figure 6B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(+)-Terrein DDS inhibits the proliferation of A549 cells. (A) Cytotoxic effect of Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS and other formulations on A549 cells. Cells were treated with different concentrations of Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS or other formulations (3–12 μg/mL) for 72 h, and cell inhibition rates were tested by the MTT assay. The data are presented as mean ± SD. (B) Effect of (+)-terrein DDS on the clone formation of A549 cells. Cells were treated with (+)-terrein DDS (0–5 μg/mL) for 7 days, and then, cells were stained with Giemsa and photographed, and ≥50 colonies were counted.

Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining was used to assess the apoptosis activity of Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS in A549 cells. As shown in Figure 7, after 36 h incubation, the cells treated with blank MSN-FCS carriers showed negligible apoptosis. With the increase of the concentration of Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS, the percentage of total apoptotic cells was obviously increased and reached 14.7%, and the percentage of necrotic cells increased to 11.7% at the concentration of 6 μg/mL. These results demonstrated that Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS could induce apoptosis in A549 cells.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS-induced apoptosis in A549 cells. A549 cells were treated with different concentrations of Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS (0–6 μg/mL) for 36 h. Then, cells were trypsinized, washed, and centrifuged. Cell apoptosis was analyzed by the flow cytometer with Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining.

The apoptosis-related proteins in A549 cells were further detected by western blot analysis. After incubation with Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS for 36 h, the cleavage of caspase-3 and caspase-9 which were the important apoptotic proteins increased significantly, confirming the occurrence of apoptosis. PARP is an important DNA repair enzyme, which may play an important role in the tumor growth and metastasis.31,32 As shown in Figure 8, the cleavage of PARP (C-PARP) increased obviously when the cells were treated with 8 μg/mL (+)-terrein DDS. These results confirmed that (+)-terrein loaded in nanocarriers was able to effectively induce the apoptosis of A549 cells. Therefore, the redox-stimulated MSNs could act as effective carriers to deliver anticancer drugs and enhance cancer therapy.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Western blotting analysis for the expression of apoptosis-related proteins in A549 cells. (A) Terrein increased apoptosis-related markers. A549 cells were treated with 0–8 μg/mL (+)-terrein for 36 h, cells were harvested and lysed, and then, cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting with indicated antibodies. Tubulin was used as a control. (B) Histogram showed the density ratio to control the apoptosis-related proteins. The data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, vs control.

3. Conclusions

The hydrophilic (+)-terrein was extracted from marine-derived fungus, and its chemical structure was identified by NMR and X-ray single crystal diffraction methods. In this study, (+)-terrein was loaded in the holes of MSNs, and chitosan chains were conjugated on the surface of nanoparticles by disulfide bonds. The loading capacity of (+)-terrein reached 13.6%, and the obtained Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS nanocarriers formed a stable dispersion system in aqueous solution. The results of CLSM clearly indicated that the fluorescence molecules were released from nanocarriers and diffused to the nucleus in A549 cells. Moreover, the (+)-terrein delivery systems exhibited cytotoxicity toward A549 cells through induction of apoptosis. The apoptotic pathway was confirmed by the increased expression of cleaved caspase-3, caspase-9, and PARP. Taken together, this work provided an effective strategy of DDSs for (+)-terrein.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Materials and Reagents

Chitosan (Mw = 10 kDa, deacetylation degree = 85.3%), folic acid, 1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), 3,3′-dithiodipropionic acid, and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane were purchased from TCI. Tetraethyl orthosilicate, cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide, succinic acid, and sodium ascorbate were purchased from Energy Chemical (Shanghai, China).

H1975, K562, DU145, A549, H411, and MCF-7 cell lines were provided by Shanghai Cell Bank, Chinese Academy of Science. A549 and H411 cell lines were cultured in F-12K medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). MCF-7 cell line was cultured in modified Eagle’s medium with 10% FBS containing 10 μg/mL insulin, and the others were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% FBS. Cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. The Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit was provided by KeyGEN BioTECH, Co., Lt, China. Antibodies against cleaved caspase-3 (C-Cas3), cleaved caspase-9 (C-Cas9), and cleaved PARP (C-PARP) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Boston, MA, USA). Other agents and kits were the products of Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China.

4.2. Extraction and Separation of (+)-Terrein

(+)-Terrein (Figure 9) was extracted and separated, as previously reported.33 The fungal strain was collected from Rumphella aggregata gathered from Nansha Islands of China in 2015. Briefly, an ethyl acetate (EtOAc) extract from the culture broth of R. aggregata was concentrated in vacuo, fractioned, and purified by silica gel VLC with a stepwise gradient of petroleum ether-EtOAc to afford five fractions (Fr.1-Fr.5). The compound was further purified by semipreparative high-performance liquid chromatography using a C18 (Kromasil) column at a flow rate of 2.0 mL/min (MeOH/H2O 9:1) to obtain (+)-terrein.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Chemical structure (A) and crystal structure (B) of (+)-terrein.

4.2.1. (+)-Terrein (1)

White crystal; ESI-MS m/z 153 [M – H]−; 1H NMR (CD3COCD3, 500 MHz, δ, ppm, J/Hz): δH 6.81 (1H, dq, J = 15.6, 6.9 Hz, H-7), 6.42 (1H, d, J = 15.6 Hz, H-6), 5.96 (1H, s, H-5), 4.73 (1H, d, J = 2.5 Hz, H-3), 4.08 (1H, d, J = 2.5 Hz, H-2), 1.90 (3H, d, J = 6.8 Hz, 8-CH3). 13C NMR (CD3COCD3, 125 MHz): δC 202.8 (C, C-1), 81.4 (CH, C-2), 76.9 (CH, C-3),168.3 (C, C-4), 124.9(CH, C-5), 125.4 (CH, C-6), 139.3 (CH, C-7), 18.5 (CH3, C-8).

4.3. Preparation of (+)-Terrein Nanocarrier

MSNs containing carboxyl (MSN-ss-COOH) was prepared according to our previous work.21 (+)-terrein (5 mg) was dissolved in 10 mL of tetrahydrofuran. Subsequently, 30 mg of MSN-ss-COOH was added and the mixture was stirred for 24 h. The suspension was centrifuged and washed with ethanol to remove unabsorbed (+)-terrein. Then, the sample was vacuum dried overnight and the product Terrein@MSN-ss-COOH was obtained.

Chitosan (100 mg) and EDC (10.0 mg) were dissolved in 1% acetic acid solution. Folic acid (5.0 mg) was dissolved in 5 mL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and slowly dropped in to chitosan solution. The mixture solution was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the mixture solution was dialyzed [molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) 3.5 kDa] in distilled water for 3 days and lyophilized, obtaining the FCS.

FCS (10 mg) was dissolved in 2 mL of 0.5% acetic acid solution. Terrein@MSN-ss-COOH (20 mg) and EDC (5.0 mg) were added, and the mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The suspension was centrifuged, washed three times with water to remove the unreacted chitosan, and dried in vacuum overnight to give the product Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS. As a control sample, MSN-FCS (without disulfide bonds) nanocarriers for (+)-terrein were prepared from MSN-COOH to study the drug release by a similar synthetic procedure. The obtained Terrein@MSN-FCS and Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS samples were sealed in plastic tubes and stored in the fridge at 4 °C. The amount of loaded (+)-terrein was determined by UV–vis at 276 nm. The (+)-terrein loading content was 12.36% according to the following equations:

4.4. (+)-Terrein Release In Vitro

Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS (10 mg) and Terrein@MSN-FCS (10 mg) were suspended in 5 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 10 μM or 10 mM GSH and loaded in a dialysis bag (MWCO = 3 kDa), respectively. The dialysis bag was immersed and dialyzed against 20 mL of PBS buffer (pH 7.4) at 37 °C. The samples were kept at 37 °C in a thermostated incubator with a shaking speed of 100 cycles/min. At predetermined time intervals, 1.0 mL of incubation solution was taken out for analysis and replaced by an equal volume of fresh PBS. The released (+)-terrein was analyzed using a UV–vis spectrophotometer at 276 nm. All measurements were performed in triplicate.

4.5. Cellular Uptake Studies

The intracellular release from nanoparticles was observed by CLSM. A549 cells were seeded into a 24-well plate (5 × 104 cells/well). FITC was loaded in MSN-ss-FCS, and MSN-FCS nanoparticles replaced (+)-terrein. After being cultured for 24 h, FITC-loaded nanoparticles were added and treated for 2 h, respectively. Subsequently, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed with fresh 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 30 min, and then stained with DAPI for cell nucleus. CLSM was used to observe the cell uptake and intracellular FITC release.

4.6. Cytotoxicity Assays

The cytotoxicity against A549 cells were evaluated using the MTT method. Cells (3000 cells/well) in their log phase of growth were seeded into 96-well plates, followed by treating with different amounts of free (+)-terrein, Terrein@MSN-FCS, and Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS (3, 6, and 12 μg/mL; the amount of Terrein@MSN-FCS and Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS was converted into loaded (+)-terrein according to the loading content) for 72 h. MTT (20 μL, 0.5 mg/mL) was added and incubated for another 4 h, and then, the supernatant was removed and the formazan product was dissolved in 200 μL DMSO. Absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a microplate reader (BioTek, USA).

4.7. Colony Formation Assay

A549 cells were seeded into 6-well plates (800 cells/well). After 24 h, different concentrations (0–5 μg/mL) of Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS were added and incubated for 7 days. Then, supernatant was removed, and cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, fixed in methanol for 20 min, and stained with Giemsa. Finally, colonies were scored and photographed. Blank MSN-ss-FCS nanoparticles were used as a control.

4.8. Annexin V-FITC/PI Double Staining Assay

The apoptosis was assayed using the Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit, according to the manufactures’ protocol. Briefly, A549 cells (3× 105 cells/well) were seeded into 6-well plates, and then, cells were incubated with Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS (0–6 μg/mL) for 36 h. Cells without treatment were used as control. At the end of incubation, cells were collected and washed with PBS and then stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI for 10 min at room temperature in the dark. Cells were gated, and 3× 104 cells were collected by the flow cytometry system (Beckman Coulter MoFlo XDP, Fullerton, CA, USA).

4.9. Western Blotting Assay

After treatment with Terrein@MSN-ss-FCS (0–8 μg/mL) for 36 h, A549 cells were collected, washed with PBS, and lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer. C-cas3 was separated by 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and C-cas9, C-PARP, and tubulin were separated by 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The proteins were probed with C-cas3, C-cas9, C-PARP, and β-tubulin primary antibodies, respectively, and then, the membranes were incubated with HRP-secondary antibodies. Bands corresponding to the antibodies were determined by enhanced chemiluminescence kits and detected by FluorChem E (ProteinSimple, USA).

4.10. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test on the data, and the value was expressed as mean ± SD. Differences of P < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Traditional Chinese Medicine Bureau of Guangdong Province (20201186), the Public Service Platform Open Project Fund of South China Sea for R&D Marine Biomedicine Resources(2HC18014), the State Key Laboratory for Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Medicinal Resources (CMEMR2018-B12), the Engineering Research Center of Clinical Functional Materials and Diagnosis & Treatment Devices of Zhejiang Province (WIBEK181008), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (201762002).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Hollenbeak K. H.; Schmitz F. J.; Hossain M. B.; Helm D. V. D. Marine natural products. Cheminform 2015, 63, 199–201. [Google Scholar]
  2. Newman D. J.; Cragg G. M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 311–335. 10.1021/np200906s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Park S.-H.; Kim D.-S.; Kim W.-G.; Ryoo I.-J.; Lee D.-H.; Huh C.-H.; Youn S.-W.; Yoo I.-D.; Park K.-C. Terrein: a new melanogenesis inhibitor and its mechanism. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2004, 61, 2878. 10.1007/s00018-004-4341-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Qi J.; Shao C.-L.; Liu M.; Qi X.; Wang C.-Y. Bioactive steroids from a marine-derived fungus penicillium sp. from the south china sea. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2014, 50, 568–570. 10.1007/s10600-014-1020-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee S.; Kim W. G.; Kim E.; Ryoo I. J.; Lee H. K.; Kim J. N.; Jung S. H.; Yoo I. D. Synthesis and melanin biosynthesis inhibitory activity of (.+-.)-Terrein produced by penicillium sp. 20135. Cheminform 2005, 15, 471–473. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wu Y.; Zhu Y.; Li S.; Zeng M.; Chu J.; Hu P.; Li J.; Guo Q.; Lv X.-B.; Huang G. Terrein performs antitumor functions on esophageal cancer cells by inhibiting cell proliferation and synergistic interaction with cisplatin. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 13, 2805–2810. 10.3892/ol.2017.5758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bomin K.; Ji-Su P.; Ha-Young C.; Sun Y. S.; Won-Gon K. Terrein is an inhibitor of quorum sensing and c-di-GMP in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a connection between quorum sensing and c-di-GMP. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8617. 10.1038/s41598-018-26974-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Arakawa M.; Someno T.; Kawada M.; Ikeda D. A new terrein glucoside, a novel inhibitor of angiogenin secretion in tumor angiogenesis. J. Antibiot. 2017, 13, 2805–2810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kasorn A.; Loison F.; Kangsamaksin T.; Jongrungruangchok S.; Ponglikitmongkol M. Terrein inhibits migration of human breast cancer cells via inhibition of the Rho and Rac signaling pathways. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 39, 1378–1386. 10.3892/or.2018.6189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liao W.-Y.; Shen C.-N.; Lin L.-H.; Yang Y.-L.; Han H.-Y.; Chen J.-W.; Kuo S.-C.; Wu S.-H.; Liaw C.-C. Asperjinone, a nor-neolignan, and terrein, a suppressor of ABCG2-expressing breast cancer cells, from thermophilic aspergillus terreus. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 75, 630–635. 10.1021/np200866z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen Y.-F.; Wang S.-Y.; Shen H.; Yao X.-F.; Zhang F.-L.; Lai D. The marine-derived fungal metabolite, terrein, inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell cycle arrest in human ovarian cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 34, 1591–1598. 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sasaki A.; Ibaragi S.; Mandai H.; Tsumura T.; Kishimoto K.; Okui T.; Monsur Hassan N. M.; Shimo T.; Omori K.; Hu G. F.; Takashiba S.; Suga S.; Sasaki A. Synthetic terrein inhibits progression of head and neck cancer by suppressing angiogenin production. Anticancer Res. 2016, 36, 2161–2168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Malmstrøm J.; Christophersen C.; Barrero A. F.; Oltra J. E.; Justicia J.; Rosales A. Bioactive metabolites from a marine-derived strain of the fungus emericella variecolor. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 364–367. 10.1021/np0103214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferguson R.; Holloway E. D.; Chandrasekhar A.; Acharya K. R.; Subramanian V. The catalytic activity and secretion of zebrafish RNases are essential for their in vivo function in motor neurons and vasculature. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1107. 10.1038/s41598-018-37140-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Xu C.; Qian Y. A selenamorpholine-based redox-responsive fluorescent probe for targeting lysosome and visualizing exogenous/endogenous hydrogen peroxide in living cells and zebrafish. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 2714–2721. 10.1039/c8tb03010c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Babikova D.; Kalinova R.; Momekova D.; Ugrinova I.; Momekov G.; Dimitrov I. Multifunctional polymer nanocarrier for efficient targeted cellular and subcellular anticancer drug delivery. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 2271–2283. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Feng L.; Yan S.; Zhu Q.; Chen J.; Deng L.; Zheng Y.; Xue W.; Guo R. Targeted multifunctional redox-sensitive micelle co-delivery of DNA and doxorubicin for the treatment of breast cancer. J. Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 3372–3386. 10.1039/c8tb00748a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Martínez-Carmona M.; Lozano D.; Colilla M.; Vallet-Regí M. Lectin-conjugated pH-responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted bone cancer treatment. Acta Biomater. 2017, 65, 393–404. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jiao J.; Li X.; Zhang S.; Liu J.; Di D.; Zhang Y.; Zhao Q.; Wang S. Redox and pH dual-responsive PEG and chitosan-conjugated hollow mesoporous silica for controlled drug release. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2016, 67, 26–33. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hei M.; Wu H.; Fu Y.; Xu Y.; Zhu W. Phenylboronic acid functionalized silica nanoparticles with enlarged ordered mesopores for efficient insulin loading and controlled release. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Technol. 2019, 51, 320–326. 10.1016/j.jddst.2019.03.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin J.-T.; Du J.-K.; Yang Y.-Q.; Li L.; Zhang D.-W.; Liang C.-L.; Wang J.; Mei J.; Wang G.-H. pH and redox dual stimulate-responsive nanocarriers based on hyaluronic acid coated mesoporous silica for targeted drug delivery. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2017, 81, 478–484. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin J.-T.; Ye Q.-B.; Yang Q.-J.; Wang G.-H. Hierarchical bioresponsive nanocarriers for codelivery of curcumin and doxorubicin. Colloids Surf., B 2019, 180, 93–101. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Xuan M.; Shao J.; Zhao J.; Li Q.; Dai L.; Li J. Magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles cloaked by red blood cell membranes: applications in cancer therapy. Angew. Chem. 2018, 57, 6049–6053. 10.1002/anie.201712996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhao J.; He Z.; Li B.; Cheng T.; Liu G. AND logic-like pH- and light-dual controlled drug delivery by surface modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2017, 73, 1–7. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hong-E W. U.; Mou X. F.; Fang Y. W.; Shao C. L. Research on the fermentation optimization of (+)-terrein from marine fungus and evaluation of its biological activities. Chin. J. Mar. Drugs 2017, 36, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  26. Salis A.; Fanti M.; Medda L.; Nairi V.; Cugia F.; Piludu M.; Sogos V.; Monduzzi M. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles functionalized with hyaluronic acid and chitosan biopolymers. effect of functionalization on cell internalization. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 741–751. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ullah I.; Zhao J.; Rukh S.; Muhammad K.; Guo J.; Ren X.-k.; Xia S.; Zhang W.; Feng Y. PEG-b-poly(disulfide-L-lysine) based redox-responsive cationic polymer for efficient gene transfection. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 1893–1905. 10.1039/c8tb03226b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nairi V.; Magnolia S.; Piludu M.; Nieddu M.; Caria C. A.; Sogos V.; Vallet-Regì M.; Monduzzi M.; Salis A. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles functionalized with hyaluronic acid. Effect of the biopolymer chain length on cell internalization. Colloids Surf., B 2018, 168, 50–59. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sun J.-T.; Piao J.-G.; Wang L.-H.; Javed M.; Hong C.-Y.; Pan C.-Y. One-pot synthesis of redox-responsive polymers-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles and their controlled drug release. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2013, 34, 1387–1394. 10.1002/marc.201300477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lei L.; Liu Z.; Yuan P.; Jin R.; Wang X.; Jiang T.; Chen X. C. Injectable colloidal hydrogel with mesoporous silica nanoparticles for sustained co-release of microRNA-222 and aspirin to achieve innervated bone regeneration in rat mandibular defects. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 2722–2735. 10.1039/c9tb00025a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yu L.-Y.; Shen Y.-A.; Chen M.-H.; Wen Y.-H.; Hsieh P.-I.; Lo C.-L. The feasibility of ROS- and GSH-responsive micelles for treating tumor-initiating and metastatic cancer stem cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 3109–3118. 10.1039/c8tb02958j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fouquerel E.; Goellner E. M.; Yu Z.; Gagné J.-P.; Barbi de Moura M.; Feinstein T.; Wheeler D.; Redpath P.; Li J.; Romero G.; Migaud M.; Van Houten B.; Poirier G. G.; Sobol R. W. ARTD1/PARP1 negatively regulates glycolysis by inhibiting hexokinase 1 independent of NAD+ depletion. Cell Rep. 2014, 8, 1819–1831. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim S. H.; Engelhardt J. I.; Henkel J. S.; Siklos L.; Soos J.; Goodman C.; Appel S. H. Widespread increased expression of the DNA repair enzyme PARP in brain in ALS. Neurology 2004, 62, 319–322. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000103291.04985.dc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES