Skip to main content
Atencion Primaria logoLink to Atencion Primaria
editorial
. 2008 Sep 30;39(9):457–460. [Article in Spanish] doi: 10.1157/13109491

El sistema GRADE para la toma de decisiones clínicas y la elaboración de recomendaciones y guías de práctica clínica

Mercé Marzo Castillejo a, Antonio Montaño Barrientos b
PMCID: PMC7659499  PMID: 17919395

The content is available as a PDF (146.4 KB).

Bibliografía

  • 1.Anonymous: Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. CMAJ. 1979; 121:1193-254. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.The GRADE Working Group Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:38. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guyatt G., Gutterman D., Baumann M.H. Grading Strength of Recommendations and Quality of Evidence in Clinical Guidelines Report from an American College of Chest Physicians Task Force. Chest. 2006;129:174–181. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.1.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dahm P., Kunz R., Schunemann H. Evidence-based clinical practice guidlines for prostate cancer: the need for a unified approach. Curr Opin Urol. 2007;17:200–207. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3280eb1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Atkins D., Best D., Briss P.A., Eccles M., Falck-Ytter Y., Flottorp S., GRADE Working Group Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schunemann H.J., Fretheim A., Oxman A.D. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:21. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-4-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Buller H.R., Agnelli G., Hull R.D., Hyers T.M., Prins M.H., Raskob G.E. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004;Suppl 3(126):401–408. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.401S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marzo-Castillejo M., Alonso-Coello P., Rotaeche del Campo R. ¿Cómo clasificar la calidad de la evidencia y la fuerza de las recomendaciones? Aten Primaria. 2006;37:5–8. doi: 10.1157/13083926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Plan de Calidad para el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Madrid: MSyC; 2006. p. 48.
  • 10.Calderon C., Rotaeche R., Etxebarria A., Marzo M., Rico R., Barandiaran M. Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:138. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guirguis-Blake J., Calonge N., Miller T., Siu A., Teutsch S, Whitlock E. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Current processes of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: refining evidence-based recommendation development. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:117–122. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-2-200707170-00170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Atencion Primaria are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES