Abstract
Recently, biosensors have been used in an increasing number of different fields and disciplines due to their wide applicability, reproducibility, and selectivity. Three large disciplines in which this has become relevant has been the forensic, biometric, and cybersecurity fields. The call for novel noninvasive biosensors for these three applications has been a focus of research in these fields. Recent advances in these three areas has relied on the use of biosensors based on primarily colorimetric assays based on bioaffinity interactions utilizing enzymatic assays. In forensics, the use of different bodily fluids for metabolite analysis provides an alternative to the use of DNA to avoid the backlog that is currently the main issue with DNA analysis by providing worthwhile information about the originator. In biometrics, the use of sweat-based systems for user authentication has been developed as a proof-of-concept design utilizing the levels of different metabolites found in sweat. Lastly, biosensor assays have been developed as a proof-of-concept for combination with cybersecurity, primarily cryptography, for the encryption and protection of data and messages.
Keywords: biosensors, forensics, biometrics, cybersecurity, fingerprints, sweat, blood, cipher
1. Background
Biosensors are widely used in multiple processes today. These include, but are not limited to, clinical diagnostics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], environmental processes [11,12,13], the food industry [13,14,15,16,17,18], and devices for military use [15,19,20]. More recently, the use of biosensors has been noted in other disciplines, namely forensics, biometrics, and cybersecurity. As biosensors are devices that employ sensing techniques relying on biorecognition elements, they are able to provide specific, rapid results pertaining to bioaffinity-based reactions. The use of biosensors in forensics enables investigators to have another source of information in addition to DNA analysis that also provides worthwhile information quickly for them to narrow down their investigation in a timely manner. Biometrics and biosensors are becoming more closely related as the technology improves in that field. The differentiation of people with more noninvasive biosensors, biosensors that do not involve intrusive procedures, is exceedingly useful. The main procedures used here involve electrochemical and enzymatic assays for analysis. Lastly, with the advent of computers, the use of biosensors in unconventional computing [21] and the combination of computing with chemistry, biology, and physics have become another facet for biosensors.
Forensics
In the realm of forensic science, there is an increasing need for new technologies to aid investigators and lab scientists in the pursuit of gathering worthwhile information from evidence. There are many subsections of evidence that are pertinent in the forensic field, but recent research has focused on three: Fingerprints, blood samples, and sweat-based field testing for ethanol and other drugs.
In the history of forensics, fingerprints have been essential in addition to being a widely emblematic feature of the forensic field in pop culture. However, fingerprints are mainly used in the field as a comparative means of identification [22], and if a print cannot be utilized for this pictorial comparison based on ridge structure, size, and shape, it is treated as exclusionary evidence [23]. This can be viewed as a large limitation on the amount of data that one can gain from this relevant piece of evidence. By analyzing the content of a print, namely the amino acids, one can gain some understanding of who the donor of that print was and be able to narrow down the search for the investigators. This is due to the metabolic [24] differences [25,26,27,28] in people due to their gender, age, medications, and lifestyle. By analyzing these types of biomarkers in a fingerprint sample, it would not only allow for one to gain much needed information that would provide additional context for investigators, but would also lead to the reduction in the need to wait for the lengthy analysis of DNA that causes a backlog [29], if any was recovered. According to the NIJ, a backlog is defined as any evidence that was not analyzed for at least 30 days after submission to a laboratory. By analyzing the content of a fingerprint instead of the pictorial fingerprint commonly relied on, it allows for smudged or partial prints, the prints that would not provide ample evidence for comparison, to have value for investigators. The chemical content of fingerprints has been examined as well, mainly focused on laboratory-based equipment such as mass spectrometric (MS) techniques that focus on total fingerprint content [24,30,31], drugs of abuse [32,33], and fatty acids to differentiate individuals based on age [34]. In addition to MS, there were optical techniques, as well using spectrophotometric instrumentation with age differences based on lipids [35], visual representation [36], and explosive content found on prints [37], as well as combined techniques such as desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) and direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS) for total content [38,39,40] and for pictorial [41,42,43]. Further analysis of these techniques can be found in a review in Trends in Analytical Chemistry [44].
In addition to fingerprints, blood is another matrix that is commonly obtained as evidence for forensic investigators. In addition to the commonly known DNA matching with a database [45,46], bloodstains are also used for splatter analysis [47,48,49], and there are even techniques to differentiate if there are multiple overlapping stains [50]. An important quality relating to the bloodstain that was missing was the time since it was deposited onto the surface, utilizing a technique that is practical and did not require great sample prep or laboratory instrumentation. This is a vital piece of information as it would allow for corroboration of stories told by possible witnesses and would enable the reduction in irrelevant and unnecessary lab work to be done with blood that is too fresh or too old at a particular scene. Another lapse in analysis of bloodstains is the determination of the age of the person the blood is from, as this can be done with DNA but is a lengthy process [51]. Similar studies using biosensors were to find biological sex and ethnicity [52,53]. Other lab techniques were attempted to be able to perform age deduction; however, they were not applicable, due to serious flaws in the techniques [54].
The third forensic matrix is sweat. Sweat is a viable forensic sample for multiple reasons, as it contains a small amount of DNA [55,56,57,58], and other metabolites and compounds [59,60,61], and people leave traces of it upon contact of surfaces with their skin [62]. As fingerprints contain sweat in addition to other components, it is a comparable matrix to what has been discussed previously. Sweat can be detected in the field utilizing one of the main components in sweat—lactate [63,64,65,66,67]. Lactate is prominent in sweat samples and, even though there are techniques that can be used in order to detect it [68,69,70,71], they require complex laboratory instrumentation and are not viable methodologies for on-site deployment. Some of these techniques rely on a tattoo-like sensing device that consists of a potentiometric sensor with a wireless receiver [70,71], involving the use of a screen-printed electrode on tattoo paper with a microfluidic channel for sweat collection and detection of analytes. By being able to find sweat on surfaces directly at a crime scene, investigators would have additional samples of viable evidence. Building upon this, emerging research has also looked at analysis involving ethanol. Multiple studies have shown that ethanol is excreted into sweat [72,73] and that sweat cannot be tampered with, similarly to how people “trick” breathalyzers. There are wearable technologies that allow for biosensing of metabolites in sweat [74,75]; however, they have a long delay, some up to two hours, that makes them useless for on-site Driving While Intoxicated (DWI) analysis. Similar research has looked into saliva for the identification of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) [76] and an overall approach that analyzes multiple types of legal and illegal compounds in sweat [77].
Biometrics
The second main discipline has been the use of biosensors for strictly biometric purposes. Namely, current research has aimed to use bioassays for the identification and differentiation of individuals. As mentioned previously, the content of different metabolites in sweat can be quantified, which can be used to find differences between people. This has implications in both the prior forensics section, biometrics in general, and even cybersecurity, which will be explained below. This method can be used to provide an alternate to DNA testing similar to the other techniques being developed for forensics. This kind of technology is similar to emerging research in biosensors and bioelectronics [78,79]. As mentioned previously, the content within a person’s sweat is a result of metabolic processes [24,25,26,27,59,80] related to what can be a person’s identifying factors such as age, biological sex, diet, and activity level. By taking measurements of and comparing results for multiple biomarkers, one can differentiate a person from others with these fluctuating factors. This can be applied for the unlocking of smart devices as the technology is moving in this direction as well [81,82,83].
As mentioned previously, sweat has been an emerging source of information in both forensics and biometrics. Many studies have been done for the advancement of various methodologies for different compounds found in sweat [84,85,86,87,88]. Further descriptions of some of the recent methodologies that have been developed for sweat analysis can be seen in Table 1 below.
Table 1.
Recent biosensor analysis techniques for sweat.
| Protocol | Description | Technique | Analyte | LOD/Range | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tattoo | Wearable skin tattoo for wireless signal transduction | Potentiometry | Sodium | 0.1–100 mM | [71] |
| Tattoo | Wearable skin tattoo for pH monitoring | Potentiometry | pH | pH 3–7 | [89] |
| Tattoo | Wearable skin tattoo for lactate monitoring | Potentiometry | Lactate | 1–20 mM | [70] |
| Tattoo | Wearable skin tattoo for monitoring | Potentiometry | Ammonium | 10−4–0.1 M | [90] |
| Superwettable bands | Multiplex method for on-body sampling | Colorimetric | pH | pH 4.5–7 | [91] |
| chloride | 0–100 mM | ||||
| glucose | 0–15 mM | ||||
| calcium | 0–15 mM | ||||
| Screen-printed electrode | Monitoring of cystic fibrosis patients | Potentiometry | Chloride | 2.7 × 10−5 mol/L | [92] |
| Janus textile bands | Multiplex method for on body sampling | Potentiometry | Glucose | 18–40 µM | [93] |
| Lactate | 10 mM | ||||
| Potassium | 0.3–6.3 mM | ||||
| Sodium | 60 mM | ||||
| Wearable sensor | Stretchable, skin-attachable sweat sensor | Potentiometry, Carbon nanotubes, gold nanosheets |
Glucose | 10.89 µA mM−1 cm−2 | [94] |
| pH | 71.44 mV pH−1 | ||||
| Graphene electrochemical | Diabetes monitoring | Gold-doped graphene | Glucose | 10 µM–0.7 mM | [95] |
| Microfluidic wearable sensor | Multiplex analysis for sensing in sweat | Colorimetric | Lactate | 0–100 mM | [96] |
| Chloride | 0–mM | ||||
| Creatine | 0–1000 µM | ||||
| pH | pH 5–8.5 | ||||
| Glucose | 0–25 mM | ||||
| liquigel | Organic electrochemical transistor | Transistor | Lactate | 0.3–1.3 mM | [97] |
| Direct iontophoresis | Sweat extraction and electrochemical analysis using smartphone | Potentiometry | Glucose | 0–100 µM | [98] |
| Chloride | 20–80 mM | ||||
| Free amino acid analysis | Eccrine sweat amino acid composition | Cation chromatography and amino acid analyzer, GC-MS | Amino acids | - | [99] |
| Wearable Sensor | Chemical electrocardiogram and simultaneous metabolite monitoring | Amperometry | Lactate | 0–28 mM | [100] |
| microfluidic | Sweat collection and analysis for kidney disorders | Colorimetric | Creatine | 0–0.5 mM | [101] |
| Urea | 0–250 mM | ||||
| pH | pH 5–7 | ||||
| Wearable sensor | Integrated multiplex array for sweat analysis | Amperometry | Sodium | 20–120 mM | [102] |
| Potassium | 2–16 mM | ||||
| Glucose | 0–200 µM | ||||
| lactate | 2–30 mM | ||||
| Wearable sensor | Monitoring for cystic fibrosis patients for sodium concentration | Potentiometry Atomic Absorption |
Sodium | 20–100 mM | [103] |
| Watch sensor | Monitoring of sodium levels | Potentiometry | Sodium | 10−4 –10−1 M | [104] |
| Tattoo | Wearable skin tattoo for alcohol monitoring in sweat | Amperometry | Alcohol | 0–36 mM | [74] |
| Wearable sensor | Drug monitoring via differential pulse | Voltammetry | Caffeine | 0–40 x µM | [105] |
| Wearable sensor | Detection of THC and Alcohol | Voltammetry Amperometry |
THC | 0.5 µM | [76] |
| Alcohol | 0.1–1 mM |
Cybersecurity
The third and final discipline has been the use of biosensors for cybersecurity purposes. This is a small transition from biometrics into cybersecurity as they are closely related. This research can be applied in two different areas of cybersecurity—authentication and cryptography. Both are important in our world with the advent of the digital age, so there is a call for innovative and worthwhile technologies across all disciplines to innovate and advance the novel research into cyber technologies. For authentication, biometrics that were mentioned previously can be applied. Ideally, if one can differentiate people, the same technology can be used to identify a person, or at the very least, dismiss an imposter. Cryptography is the use of codes and cyphers in order to encrypt data to keep them safe, either in transmission between people as a message or safekeeping in storage [106,107,108]. Many multidisciplinary researchers have been applying their research to encryption, including, but not limited to, fluorescence [109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117], nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [118], bacteria [119], antibodies [120], and molecular computing systems [121,122,123,124], with the heaviest research in DNA applications [125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133].
2. Research
Forensics
First, in the forensic field, emerging research has focused on the three areas of study above with fingerprints [44,134,135,136,137], blood [138,139], sweat [140,141], and one general review on the use of biocomputing in forensics [142]. These five fingerprint papers provide novel applications of biorecognition elements that can be used for future biosensing devices. These papers are centralized on the idea that people have different levels of certain L-amino acids, which are related to their metabolism and different traits, allowing them to be differentiated into groups. The blood papers use the degradation of certain enzymes in order to determine the time that a blood spot has been outside the body and to identify the age of the originator from the level of a separate enzyme. The sweat papers use the levels of different compounds in sweat in order to identify sweat and to be able to provide an alternative technique for alcohol intoxication. The methodologies within these papers use different biosensors, some via enzyme assays, some with chemical reactions. A generic enzymatic assay diagram can be seen in Figure 1, where specific substrates for the enzyme are used in the assay to produce byproducts, one of which is a recognition element. The last paper is a review on other trending types of fingerprint analysis such as the use of mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, nanotechnology, and combinatorial methods [44].
Figure 1.
Generic enzymatic assay example.
A fingerprint paper from 2015 uses an enzymatic cascade utilizing L-amino acid oxidase (L-AAO) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in the presence of L-amino acids to produce a visible color by oxidizing the redox dye o-dianisidine, which results in a color that may be analyzed at 436 nm [134]. Due to the fact that women produce a higher amount of these amino acids than men [26,27,28], this assay would allow for the determination of a person’s biological sex. First, the assay was performed utilizing 50 mimicked samples, 25 male and 25 female, containing 23 target amino acids in concentrations based on reported values calculated in R-project software. This resulted in the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 99%, showing a high probability for this methodology to differentiate between the two sexes. This was then repeated with three male and three female volunteers testing both their right and left thumbs in an acid extraction methodology using polyurethane film as a medium that was developed in the same article. These real samples also show definitive differentiation between the male and female prints. Different surfaces around the lab, such as a computer screen and doorknob, were also tested in this manuscript to show viability on different surfaces. An additional paper from 2016 follows the same principles as the L-AAO/HRP assay in order to find an alternative methodology to determine biological sex, this time utilizing a chemical assay [135]. This assay uses ninhydrin, which produces a colorimetric reaction with alpha-amino (α-NH2) acids [143,144]. Ninhydrin is commonly used in forensics already as it produces Ruhemann’s purple as a product in the presence of all α-NH2 acids. The process in this paper is similar to the last: 50 total mimicked samples with designated concentrations of the 23 amino acids from R-project software are analyzed photometrically at 570 nm. The area under the ROC curve in this case was at 94%, showing a high probability to correctly distinguish the two sexes. After this, five male and five female volunteers were analyzed using this technique, resulting in a 91% area under the curve for authentic samples.
Following this trend, a paper from 2017 also uses a chemical assay for the determination of biological sex with the focus being on the Bradford reagent, Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 dye [136]. Bradford is commonly used for quantifying proteins and is less affected by reagents and nonprotein components of samples than other commonly used reagents [145]. The goal of utilizing this assay is that it only targets six specific amino acids with which to form a colorimetric complex, thus enabling a more focused approach to the determination of biological sex with the ideal being the determination of a single amino acid assay to differentiate the sexes. Contrary to the previous papers, only authentic fingerprints were sampled from 50 authentic fingerprint samples from volunteers—25 males and 25 females. This resulted in an area under the curve of the ROC graph of 99%, showing the highest probability of the three methods to correctly identify the biological sex of the fingerprint donor.
The final fingerprint paper to be examined goes one step further, by using two separate tests, each targeting a specific amino acid, in order to differentiate on the basis of biological sex [137]. The two methods used are an enzymatic cascade targeting alanine and a chemical assay that targets arginine. The alanine-targeting assay consists of a three-enzyme cascade with alanine transaminase, pyruvate oxidase, and horseradish peroxidase [146]. In the presence of alanine in addition to the other substrates necessary for the assay, a redox dye is oxidized by HRP and can be spectrophotometrically measured. Following the previously established standard, even though the mimicked samples produced the lowest AUC of the ROC curve with a value of 82%, the authentic samples of 50 total individuals was vastly improved at 99.8%. The second technique in this research consisted of the application of the Sakaguchi Test [147], which involves α-naphthol, NaOH, and sodium hypobromite in order to form a red-colored complex. As in the previous experiments, both mimicked and authentic samples were tested, resulting in both AUCs being 100%.
In order to apply these types of biosensor techniques to other bodily fluids that are forensically relevant, blood is another focus of research. The main topic that research on blood is centered around is the estimation of the time since deposition, TSD, of a blood spot. The first paper focuses on this by measuring the levels of two biomarkers in blood, citrate kinase (CK) and alanine transaminase (ALT), which denature with the passage of time of up to 5 days [138]. The CK assay involves creatine and adenosine triphosphate as substrates for the first enzyme, CK, in a three-enzyme cascade utilizing pyruvate kinase (PK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as the other two enzymes. LDH, the third enzyme in the cascade, is the enzyme involved with production of the recognition element β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide from β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide reduced, which produces a reduction in signal at 340 nm. ALT is a two-enzyme assay that also utilizes LDH to allow for simultaneous determination. ALT recognizes the substrates alanine and α-ketoglutaric acid. By using a two-analyte system, this provides a more reliable system of determination as it has parallel markers being analyzed compared to a single marker. Building upon this, the technique outlined in the second paper uses one assay to determine not only the TSD, but also an estimation of the age of the source individual [139]. By looking at alkaline phosphatase (ALP), this research achieves both goals. This is due to the fact that ALP is a commonly used biomarker in clinical diagnostics for bone growth that relates directly to the age of the individual. To measure this, ALP converts the substrate p-nitrophenol phosphate into p-nitrophenol, which also acts as the recognition element as p-nitrophenol is observable at 405 nm. As ALP is a biomarker for bone growth, and that it degenerates over time when out of the body, one can obtain data about the relative age of the blood donor and the TSD up to 2 days. For the analysis of this methodology, 100 samples were prepared via the R-project software mentioned previously, split evenly between young and old, males and females. The samples provided an AUC for the ROC curve of 99% for males and 100% for the female group in differentiating between old and young.
The third forensic medium that is being researched currently is sweat. As previously mentioned, sweat has many forensic applications but is difficult to identify at a crime scene. To this end, a novel methodology in order to identify sweat by use of a biosensor strip based on the detection of lactate was developed [140]. This method utilized an enzymatic assay in order to detect lactate, a major component in sweat. The assay used involved a two-enzyme cascade of lactate oxidase (LOx) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP). LOx involves the substrates lactate and oxygen, which are used to produce hydrogen peroxide. This hydrogen peroxide is then used by HRP as mentioned previously with a redox dye to produce a signal. This methodology was able to detect sweat with minimal decay for up to two weeks and at low amounts of sweat: Around 50 nL. This technique was even applied onto a paper strip modified with polystyrene for use as a field-deployable device. This optical strip provides a binary YES/NO for the presence of sweat via a color change, which is ideal for preliminary detection of sweat that can itself be analyzed further. Additionally, sweat was further examined in a noninvasive testing methodology for ethanol sensing on the surface of one’s skin [141]. This conceptualizes an alternative method to breathalyzers by relying on an enzymatic assay involving alcohol oxidase (AOx) and HRP that is quantified not only by UV-Vis spectrophotometry but also an optical camera. AOx uses ethanol and oxygen as substrates to produce hydrogen peroxide, which is used by HRP as mentioned previously. This research shows that there is a correlation between both techniques and the currently used breathalyzer. The data were achieved from a 26-volunteer drinking study with people of different ages, biological sexes, and food habits. The sweat samples were obtained through pilocarpine electrophoresis similar to the Gibson and Cooke method [148], which allowed the sweat to be collected in gauze pads and analyzed. A minimum of 3 µL of sweat was required for this method.
These advances with biosensors in the field of forensics have produced a viable way for investigators to receive some information to pursue leads if DNA evidence is backlogged or not applicable using sweat and blood evidence found at the crime scene. Multiple enzymatic assays were developed for the differentiation of biological sex of an individual from fingerprint content, enabling an alternative or additional analysis for fingerprints depending on the clarity of the print for pictorial analysis. Blood was examined, and provides a viable methodology in order to show the time since deposition, TSD, and also an estimated age of the originator of the blood spot. Additionally, a field-deployable testing strip was developed for the determination of sweat, supplying clarity for a difficult-to-detect bodily fluid at crime scenes. Sweat was also tested in a laboratory setting for an alternative to breathalyzers for the detection and quantification of alcohol in sweat utilizing enzymatic assays and a colorimetric response. In the future, different drugs and illicit substances, such as THC, in addition to a more broad analysis of metabolites characteristic to certain habits or biological features can be examined for their use in forensics for providing a more deterministic and rapid analysis for forensic and law enforcement personnel in a sweeping suite of biosensor devices.
Biometrics
Currently, biometrics is another avenue of interest for biosensors [149]. This paper from Hair et al. uses the levels of three metabolites found in sweat in order to differentiate people. This analysis is performed using three enzymatic assays that each target the metabolites: Lactate, urea, and glutamate. The assay for lactate is the same one that was outlined in the sweat paper involving the paper strips. The assay for urea involves the enzymes urease and glutamate dehydrogenase. The final assay that is used for glutamate involves only glutamate dehydrogenase. These assays could be measured spectrophotometrically using either a redox dye in LOx/HRP or with conversions involving NADH and NAD+ in the other two. First, 50 mimicked sweat samples were run and compared, which showed that this method was viable as there was no overlap between the samples. Additionally, 25 authentic samples were analyzed, where the sweat was collected according to the same procedure as the Gibson and Cooke method mentioned above [148]. A multivariate analysis of variance statistic test (MANOVA), was performed for both the authentic and mimicked sample sets to determine if the combination of the three analytes were truly unique. Both sets produced p-values of <0.001 each. In addition, six ANOVA tests were performed between each analyte for the mimicked and authentic samples. All six of these tests also produced p-values of <0.001. These statistical values show that there is not only a significant statistical difference between individuals in the combination of the three analytes, but also a significant difference between each individual for a single analyte. The analysis shows that these three metabolites can be used in order to produce an individual’s “sweat profile,” enabling differentiation between individuals. The implications for this research are multidisciplinary as there are many forensic, cybersecurity, and point-of-care diagnostic applications that would benefit from this method.
This use of sweat content for biometric purposes is progressing but further research needs to be done for biometrics to be a reliable form of authentication using biosensor methodologies. The main future aspect that would need to be studied is a long-term study relating to the monitoring of the levels of the chosen metabolites in people and how the levels fluctuate over time relating to different factors such as stress, diet, and other day-to-day habits. For higher security when used for authentication, especially for higher-security systems and cybersecurity, additional metabolites would need to also be concurrently measured as well. This monitoring process would not only assist in the future of biometrics but also in existing disciplines such as clinical diagnostics.
Cybersecurity
Lastly, the use of biosensors for cybersecurity is a growing trend. The use of sensors for authentication of an individual and a novel methodology related to cryptography were recently developed [150,151]. The first paper represents a review with the aim of introducing a multi-assay wearable biosensor that would provide continuous tracking of a person’s sweat metabolites for authentication purposes. This review looks at many of the assays previously mentioned: ALT/LDH, ALT/POx/HRP, and GlDH, and some that were not mentioned: Alanine and glutamate assay with ALT, glutamate oxidase, and HRP; aspartate using the aspartate transaminase enzyme; and a combined version with all three of these new analytes in a single assay. By monitoring these assays, one can produce output data that would be beneficial in the authentication of a person with many cybersecurity applications. The second paper illustrates the use of three enzyme assays in order to encrypt a short message using a basic cipher [151]. The three enzymatic assays used involved HRP, lysozyme, and ALP. HRP and ALP were used as previously mentioned. Lysozyme breaks down cell walls from cells added during the assay to produce a reduction in signal at 450 nm, acting as the recognition element. The data resulting from the colorimetric assays are used in the encryption of a message. Provided that the receiver of the message performs the same experiment under the same conditions, the message will be properly decrypted. The data from these enzymatic assays act as “keys” that one use in order to lock and unlock data in relation to encryption.
This brief combination of cryptology and biosensors can have a large impact on the future of user authentication, cryptography, and unconventional computing as a whole. The processes outlined here can be combined with biometrics for user authentication, which is considered just as, or more, important compared to data security through encryption. In cryptography, the further research of other biosensor systems combined with stronger and more robust encryption methods can lead to the advancement of these systems to be used instead of random number generators, which have been controversial for use in cryptography since their inception [152]. Going even further, biosensors can be further researched for direct encryption of data to provide an alternative to the widely researched encryption via DNA [94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,122,123,124,125,126,153,154,155,156,157].
3. Conclusions
Current research in biosensors has led to advancement in the use of biosensors on three fronts: Forensics, biometrics, and cybersecurity. In the field of forensics, the use of fingerprint material has been demonstrated to be capable of being used to determine the biological sex of a person through multiple methods. These methods relied on the detection of certain amino acids, some methods consisted of a broad detection of 23 amino acids, and some methods were much more selective and targeted down to a single amino acid. Additionally, the use of another medium, blood, allows one to deterministically estimate the amount of time that the blood has been outside the body for up to 2 days by analyzing the degradation of enzymes present in blood. Additionally, it was found that a single assay was able to not only estimate this time since deposition, but to also estimate the age of the originator. Sweat has been the third major medium in forensic endeavors, building upon the fingerprint analysis as fingerprints contain sweat. A novel methodology for a lactate-detecting on-site testing strip was developed in order to identify the presence of sweat due to the high concentration of lactate in sweat. This method was highly sensitive and required extremely small volumes of sweat to produce a tangible response. Sweat has also been examined for other purposes, showing that one can detect the presence of ethanol in sweat, providing another method of determining intoxication levels besides a breathalyzer or invasive blood techniques, in addition to detecting other drugs of abuse. Sweat was further analyzed for biometric purposes by comparing the levels of three metabolites found in sweat to differentiate individuals. Lastly, methods involving biosensors for both the authentication of individuals and for cryptography were developed, benefitting two major establishments of cybersecurity.
In the future, biosensors can further fulfill the expansion of these three fields with additional research. In the field of forensics, a wider array of metabolites may be examined for use in a device that would analyze a certain body fluid and provide more information relating to the habits and identifying information of the originator in addition to the biological sex and age mentioned previously. Additionally, more research can be performed in order to provide for a broad testing kit with higher accuracy and precision for various compounds, illicit and legal, for use in roadside testing to aid law enforcement officers. Biometrics and biosensors are closely related, as shown by the research seen here. Further analysis utilizing monitoring and other metabolite tracking will reinforce not only the strengths in the use of this methodology but also possibly reduce or remove the current unknowns and limitations for this method. Lastly, the use of different bioaffinity-based assay systems for cryptography for the use of different cipher systems will provide a reliable alternative to the random number generator systems used in cryptography today. This work in cybersecurity can also be combined with biometrics for user authentication for digital and evolving systems. Biosensors have been an important facet in the fields of clinical diagnostics, environmental processes, and military devices, and is a strong emerging technique in the fields of forensic science, biometrics, and cybersecurity. In these three fields, biosensors have produced considerable results thus far and have an auspicious future for further research.
Funding
This research was funded by NIJ grant number 2016-DN-BX-0188.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.D’Orazio P. Biosensors in clinical chemistry—2011 update. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2011;412:1749–1761. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.06.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Burcu Bahadir E., Kemal Sezgintürk M. Applications of electrochemical immunosensors for early clinical diagnostics. Talanta. 2015;132:162–174. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.08.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bianchi V., Guerra C., De munari I., Ciampolini P. Wearable sensors for behavioral assessment. Gerontechnology. 2016 doi: 10.4017/gt2016.15.S.899.00. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guilbault G.G., Palleschi G., Lubrano G. Non-invasive biosensors in clinical analysis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1995;10:379–392. doi: 10.1016/0956-5663(95)96856-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Guilbault G.G., Pravda M., Kreuzer M., O’Sullivan C.K. Biosensors—42 Years and counting. Anal. Lett. 2004;37:1481–1496. doi: 10.1081/AL-120037582. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ferapontova E.E. DNA Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Sensors for Nucleic Acids. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2018;11:197–218. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061417-125811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sanghavi B.J., Wolfbeis O.S., Hirsch T., Swami N.S. Nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensing of neurological drugs and neurotransmitters. Microchim. Acta. 2015;182:1–41. doi: 10.1007/s00604-014-1308-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shen Y., Tran T.T., Modha S., Tsutsui H., Mulchandani A. A paper-based chemiresistive biosensor employing single-walled carbon nanotubes for low-cost, point-of-care detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019;130:367–373. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.09.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.García-Arellano H., Fink D., Muñoz Hernández G., Vacík J., Hnatowicz V., Alfonta L. Nuclear track-based biosensors with the enzyme laccase. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014;310:66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tzouvadaki I., De Micheli G., Carrara S. Springer Series in Advanced Microelectronics. Springer; Singapore: 2020. Memristive Biosensors for Ultrasensitive Diagnostics and Therapeutics. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Volkov A.G., Volkova-Gugeshashvili M.I., Osei A.J. Plants as environmental biosensors: Non-invasive monitoring techniques; Proceedings of the Appropriate Technologies for Environmental Protection in the Developing World—Selected Papers from ERTEP 2007; Ghana, Africa. 17–19 July 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Somerset V. Environmental Biosensors. InTech; Rijeka, Croatia: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Van Dorst B., Mehta J., Bekaert K., Rouah-Martin E., De Coen W., Dubruel P., Blust R., Robbens J. Recent advances in recognition elements of food and environmental biosensors: A review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010;26:1178–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bollella P., Hibino Y., Kano K., Gorton L., Antiochia R. Highly Sensitive Membraneless Fructose Biosensor Based on Fructose Dehydrogenase Immobilized onto Aryl Thiol Modified Highly Porous Gold Electrode: Characterization and Application in Food Samples. Anal. Chem. 2018;90:12131–12136. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bahadir E.B., Sezgintürk M.K. Applications of commercial biosensors in clinical, food, environmental, and biothreat/biowarfare analyses. Anal. Biochem. 2015;478:107–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2015.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Alocilja E.C., Radke S.M. Market analysis of biosensors for food safety. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2003;18:841–846. doi: 10.1016/S0956-5663(03)00009-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Thakur M.S., Ragavan K.V. Biosensors in food processing. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013;50:625–641. doi: 10.1007/s13197-012-0783-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Siepenkoetter T., Salaj-Kosla U., Magner E. The Immobilization of Fructose Dehydrogenase on Nanoporous Gold Electrodes for the Detection of Fructose. ChemElectroChem. 2017;4:905–912. doi: 10.1002/celc.201600842. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shi H., Zhao H., Liu Y., Gao W., Dou S.C. Systematic analysis of a military wearable device based on a multi-level fusion framework: Research directions. Sensors (Switzerland) 2019;19:2651. doi: 10.3390/s19122651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pohanka M., Jun D., Kuca K. Amperometric biosensors for real time assays of organophosphates. Sensors. 2008;8:5303–5312. doi: 10.3390/s8095303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Andrew A.M. Unconventional computing. Kybernetes. 2012;41:518–522. doi: 10.1108/03684921211229587. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yamashita B., French M., Bleay S., Cantu A., Inlow V., Ramotowski R., Sears V., Wakefield M. The Fingerprint Sourcebook. U.S. Department of Justice; Washington, DC, USA: 2010. Latent Print Development-Chapter 7 Fingerprint Sourcebook. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Francese S., Bradshaw R., Ferguson L.S., Wolstenholme R., Clench M.R., Bleay S. Beyond the ridge pattern: Multi-informative analysis of latent fingermarks by MALDI mass spectrometry. Analyst. 2013;138:4215–4228. doi: 10.1039/c3an36896c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Thody A.J., Shuster S. Control and function of sebaceous glands. Physiol. Rev. 1989;59:383–416. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1989.69.2.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Beskaravainy P.M., Molchanov M.V., Suslikov A.V., Paskevich S.I., Kutyshenko V.P., Vorob’ev S.I. NMR study of human biological fluids for detection of pathologies. Biomeditsinskaya Khim. 2015;61:141–149. doi: 10.18097/PBMC20156101141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hier S.W., Cornbleet T., Bergeim O. The amino acids of human sweat. J. Biol. Chem. 1946;166:327–333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Coltman C.A., Rowe N.J., Atwell R.J. The amino acid content of sweat in normal adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1966;18:373–378. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/18.5.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Croxton R.S., Baron M.G., Butler D., Kent T., Sears V.G. Variation in amino acid and lipid composition of latent fingerprints. Forensic Sci. Int. 2010;199:93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.NIJ DNA Backlog. [(accessed on 15 September 2020)]; Available online: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=259066.
- 30.Hartzell-Baguley B., Hipp R.E., Morgan N.R., Morgan S.L. Chemical composition of latent fingerprints by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. An experiment for an instrumental analysis course. J. Chem. Educ. 2007;84:689. doi: 10.1021/ed084p689. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Archer N.E., Charles Y., Elliott J.A., Jickells S. Changes in the lipid composition of latent fingerprint residue with time after deposition on a surface. Forensic Sci. Int. 2005;154:224–239. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jacob S., Jickells S., Wolff K., Smith N. Drug Testing by Chemical Analysis of Fingerprint Deposits from Methadone- Maintained Opioid Dependent Patients Using UPLC-MS/MS. Drug Metab. Lett. 2008 doi: 10.2174/187231208786734094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Goucher E., Kicman A., Smith N., Jickells S. The detection and quantification of lorazepam and its 3-O-glucuronide in fingerprint deposits by LC-MS/MS. J. Sep. Sci. 2009 doi: 10.1002/jssc.200900097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Michalski S., Shaler R., Dorman F.L. The Evaluation of Fatty Acid Ratios in Latent Fingermarks by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Analysis. J. Forensic Sci. 2013 doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Antoine K.M., Mortazavi S., Miller A.D., Miller L.M. Chemical differences are observed in children’s versus adults’ latent fingerprints as a function of time. J. Forensic Sci. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01262.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ricci C., Phiriyavityopas P., Curum N., Chan K.L.A., Jickells S., Kazarian S.G. Chemical imaging of latent fingerprint residues. Appl. Spectrosc. 2007 doi: 10.1366/000370207780807849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mou Y., Rabalais J.W. Detection and Identification of Explosive Particles in Fingerprints Using Attenuated Total Reflection-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectromicroscopy. J. Forensic Sci. 2009 doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01060.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Morelato M., Beavis A., Kirkbride P., Roux C. Forensic applications of desorption electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (DESI-MS) Forensic Sci. Int. 2013;226:10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ifa D.R., Jackson A.U., Paglia G., Cooks R.G. Forensic applications of ambient ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009;394:1995–2008. doi: 10.1007/s00216-009-2659-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hazarika P., Jickells S.M., Wolff K., Russell D.A. Multiplexed detection of metabolites of narcotic drugs from a single latent fingermark. Anal. Chem. 2010 doi: 10.1021/ac1023205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.van Dam A., Aalders M.C.G., de Puit M., Gorré S.M., Irmak D., van Leeuwen T.G., Lambrechts S.A.G. Immunolabeling and the compatibility with a variety of fingermark development techniques. Sci. Justice. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bradshaw R., Rao W., Wolstenholme R., Clench M.R., Bleay S., Francese S. Separation of overlapping fingermarks by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Forensic Sci. Int. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wolstenholme R., Bradshaw R., Clench M.R., Francese S. Study of latent fingermarks by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry imaging of endogenous lipids. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009 doi: 10.1002/rcm.4218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Huynh C., Halámek J. Trends in fingerprint analysis. TrAC—Trends Anal. Chem. 2016;82:328–336. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2016.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.An J.H., Shin K.J., Yang W.I., Lee H.Y. Body fluid identification in forensics. BMB Rep. 2012;45:545–553. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2012.45.10.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gill P., Jeffreys A.J., Werrett D.J. Forensic application of DNA “fingerprints”. Nature. 1985 doi: 10.1038/318577a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Flight C., Jones M., Ballantyne K.N. Determination of the maximum distance blood spatter travels from a vertical impact. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Brettell T.A., Butler J.M., Saferstein R. Forensic science. Anal. Chem. 2005;77:3839–3860. doi: 10.1021/ac050682e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Erbisti P.C.F., Gardner R.M. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis with an Introduction to Crime Scene Reconstruction. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Elkins K. Forensic DNA Biology. 3rd ed. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bocklandt S., Lin W., Sehl M.E., Sánchez F.J., Sinsheimer J.S., Horvath S., Vilain E. Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e41821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kramer F., Halámková L., Poghossian A., Schöning M.J., Katz E., Halámek J. Biocatalytic analysis of biomarkers for forensic identification of ethnicity between Caucasian and African American groups. Analyst. 2013;138:6251–6257. doi: 10.1039/c3an01062g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bakshi S., Halámková L., Halámek J., Katz E. Biocatalytic analysis of biomarkers for forensic identification of gender. Analyst. 2014;139:559–563. doi: 10.1039/C3AN02055J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Meissner C., Ritz-Timme S. Molecular pathology and age estimation. Forensic Sci. Int. 2010;203:34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pizzamiglio M., Mameli A., Maugeri G., Garofano L. Identifying the culprit from LCN DNA obtained from saliva and sweat traces linked to two different robberies and use of a database. Int. Congr. Ser. 2004 doi: 10.1016/S0531-5131(03)01853-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pizzamiglio M., Marino A., Portera G., My D., Bellino C., Garofano L. Robotic DNA extraction system as a new way to process sweat traces rapidly and efficiently. Int. Congr. Ser. 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.ics.2005.12.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sikirzhytski V., Sikirzhytskaya A., Lednev I.K. Multidimensional Raman spectroscopic signature of sweat and its potential application to forensic body fluid identification. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.12.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Stouder S., Reubush K., Hobson D., Smith J. Trace Evidence Scrapings: A Valuable Source of DNA? Forensic Sci. Commun. 2001;4:4. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Verde T., Shephard R.J., Corey P., Moore R. Sweat composition in exercise and in heat. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 1982 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1982.53.6.1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Patterson M.J., Galloway S.D.R., Nimmo M.A. Variations in regional sweat composition in normal human males. Exp. Physiol. 2000 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-445X.2000.02058.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Costa F., Calloway D.H., Margen S. Regional and total body sweat composition of men fed controlled diets. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1969 doi: 10.1093/ajcn/22.1.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pinson E.A. Evaporation from human skin with sweat glands inactivated. Am. J. Physiol. Content. 1942 doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1942.137.3.492. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.ÅStrand I. Lactate Content in Sweat. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1963 doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1963.tb02658.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Buono M.J., Lee N.V.L., Miller P.W. The relationship between exercise intensity and the sweat lactate excretion rate. J. Physiol. Sci. 2010 doi: 10.1007/s12576-009-0073-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kondoh Y., Kawase M., Ohmori S. D-Lactate concentrations in blood, urine and sweat before and after exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1992 doi: 10.1007/BF01466280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Derbyshire P.J., Barr H., Davis F., Higson S.P.J. Lactate in human sweat: A critical review of research to the present day. J. Physiol. Sci. 2012;62:429–440. doi: 10.1007/s12576-012-0213-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Meyer F., Laitano O., Bar-Or O., McDougall D., Heingenhauser G.J.F. Effect of age and gender on sweat lactate and ammonia concentrations during exercise in the heat. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2007 doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2007000100017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ghamouss F., Ledru S., Ruillé N., Lantier F., Boujtita M. Bulk-modified modified screen-printing carbon electrodes with both lactate oxidase (LOD) and horseradish peroxide (HRP) for the determination of l-lactate in flow injection analysis mode. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ballesta Claver J., Valencia Mirón M.C., Capitán-Vallvey L.F. Disposable electrochemiluminescent biosensor for lactate determination in saliva. Analyst. 2009 doi: 10.1039/b821922b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Jia W., Bandodkar A.J., Valdés-Ramírez G., Windmiller J.R., Yang Z., Ramírez J., Chan G., Wang J. Electrochemical tattoo biosensors for real-time noninvasive lactate monitoring in human perspiration. Anal. Chem. 2013 doi: 10.1021/ac401573r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bandodkar A.J., Molinnus D., Mirza O., Guinovart T., Windmiller J.R., Valdés-Ramírez G., Andrade F.J., Schöning M.J., Wang J. Epidermal tattoo potentiometric sodium sensors with wireless signal transduction for continuous non-invasive sweat monitoring. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Buono M.J. Sweat ethanol concentrations are highly correlated with co-existing blood values in humans. Exp. Physiol. 1999 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-445X.1999.01798.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Nyman E., Palmlöv A. The Elimination of Ethyl Alcohol in Sweat. Skand. Arch. Physiol. 1936 doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1936.tb01150.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kim J., Jeerapan I., Imani S., Cho T.N., Bandodkar A., Cinti S., Mercier P.P., Wang J. Noninvasive Alcohol Monitoring Using a Wearable Tattoo-Based Iontophoretic-Biosensing System. ACS Sens. 2016 doi: 10.1021/acssensors.6b00356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Swift R. Transdermal alcohol measurement for estimation of blood alcohol concentration. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2000;24:422–423. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2000.tb02006.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mishra R.K., Sempionatto J.R., Li Z., Brown C., Galdino N.M., Shah R., Liu S., Hubble L.J., Bagot K., Tapert S., et al. Simultaneous detection of salivary Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and alcohol using a Wearable Electrochemical Ring Sensor. Talanta. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Teymourian H., Parrilla M., Sempionatto J.R., Montiel N.F., Barfidokht A., Van Echelpoel R., De Wael K., Wang J. Wearable Electrochemical Sensors for the Monitoring and Screening of Drugs. ACS Sens. 2020 doi: 10.1021/acssensors.0c01318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Jeerapan I., Sempionatto J.R., Wang J. On-Body Bioelectronics: Wearable Biofuel Cells for Bioenergy Harvesting and Self-Powered Biosensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201906243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sempionatto J.R., Jeerapan I., Krishnan S., Wang J. Wearable Chemical Sensors: Emerging Systems for On-Body Analytical Chemistry. Anal. Chem. 2019;92:378–396. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Mickelsen O., Keys A. The composition of sweat, with special reference to vitamins. J. Biol. Chem. 1943;149:479–490. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Lemonick S. You Could Unlock Your Phone with Sweat. [(accessed on 15 September 2020)];Forbes. 2017 Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/samlemonick/2017/11/15/you-could-unlock-your-phone-with-sweat/#7225db7849ae. [Google Scholar]
- 82.French L. Virtual Case Notes: Sweat, Skin Secretions Could Contain Chemical ‘Password’ for Future Mobile Authentication. Forensic Magazine. Nov 16, 2017.
- 83.Murphy M. Sweat Could Soon Unlock Your Phone. [(accessed on 15 September 2020)]; Available online: https://nypost.com/2017/11/14/sweat-could-soon-unlock-your-phone/
- 84.Nagamine K., Nomura A., Ichimura Y., Izawa R., Sasaki S., Furusawa H., Matsui H., Tokito S. Printed organic transistor-based biosensors for non-invasive sweat analysis. Anal. Sci. 2020 doi: 10.2116/analsci.19R007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Bandodkar A.J., Jeang W.J., Ghaffari R., Rogers J.A. Wearable Sensors for Biochemical Sweat Analysis. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019;12:1–22. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061318-114910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gao W., Nyein H.Y.Y., Shahpar Z., Tai L.C., Wu E., Bariya M., Ota H., Fahad H.M., Chen K., Javey A. Wearable sweat biosensors; Proceedings of the Technical Digest—International Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM; San Francisco, CA, USA. 3–7 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Bandodkar A.J., Wang J. Non-invasive wearable electrochemical sensors: A review. Trends Biotechnol. 2014;32:363–371. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Heikenfeld J. Non-invasive Analyte Access and Sensing through Eccrine Sweat: Challenges and Outlook circa 2016. Electroanalysis. 2016;28:1242–1249. doi: 10.1002/elan.201600018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bandodkar A.J., Hung V.W.S., Jia W., Valdés-Ramírez G., Windmiller J.R., Martinez A.G., Ramírez J., Chan G., Kerman K., Wang J. Tattoo-based potentiometric ion-selective sensors for epidermal pH monitoring. Analyst. 2013 doi: 10.1039/C2AN36422K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Guinovart T., Bandodkar A.J., Windmiller J.R., Andrade F.J., Wang J. A potentiometric tattoo sensor for monitoring ammonium in sweat. Analyst. 2013 doi: 10.1039/c3an01672b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.He X., Xu T., Gu Z., Gao W., Xu L.P., Pan T., Zhang X. Flexible and Superwettable Bands as a Platform toward Sweat Sampling and Sensing. Anal. Chem. 2019 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Hauke A., Oertel S., Knoke L., Fein V., Maier C., Brinkmann F., Jank M.P.M. Screen-Printed Sensor for Low-Cost Chloride Analysis in Sweat for Rapid Diagnosis and Monitoring of Cystic Fibrosis. Biosensors. 2020;10:123. doi: 10.3390/bios10090123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.He X., Yang S., Pei Q., Song Y., Liu C., Xu T., Zhang X. Integrated Smart Janus Textile Bands for Self-Pumping Sweat Sampling and Analysis. ACS Sens. 2020 doi: 10.1021/acssensors.0c00563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Oh S.Y., Hong S.Y., Jeong Y.R., Yun J., Park H., Jin S.W., Lee G., Oh J.H., Lee H., Lee S.S., et al. Skin-Attachable, Stretchable Electrochemical Sweat Sensor for Glucose and pH Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018 doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b03342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lee H., Choi T.K., Lee Y.B., Cho H.R., Ghaffari R., Wang L., Choi H.J., Chung T.D., Lu N., Hyeon T., et al. A graphene-based electrochemical device with thermoresponsive microneedles for diabetes monitoring and therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Koh A., Kang D., Xue Y., Lee S., Pielak R.M., Kim J., Hwang T., Min S., Banks A., Bastien P., et al. A soft, wearable microfluidic device for the capture, storage, and colorimetric sensing of sweat. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf2593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Khodagholy D., Curto V.F., Fraser K.J., Gurfinkel M., Byrne R., Diamond D., Malliaras G.G., Benito-Lopez F., Owens R.M. Organic electrochemical transistor incorporating an ionogel as a solid state electrolyte for lactate sensing. J. Mater. Chem. 2012 doi: 10.1039/c2jm15716k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Emaminejad S., Gao W., Wu E., Davies Z.A., Nyein H.Y.Y., Challa S., Ryan S.P., Fahad H.M., Chen K., Shahpar Z., et al. Autonomous sweat extraction and analysis applied to cystic fibrosis and glucose monitoring using a fully integrated wearable platform. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701740114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Mark H., Harding C.R. Amino acid composition, including key derivatives of eccrine sweat: Potential biomarkers of certain atopic skin conditions. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2013 doi: 10.1111/ics.12019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Imani S., Bandodkar A.J., Mohan A.M.V., Kumar R., Yu S., Wang J., Mercier P.P. A wearable chemical-electrophysiological hybrid biosensing system for real-time health and fitness monitoring. Nat. Commun. 2016 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zhang Y., Guo H., Kim S.B., Wu Y., Ostojich D., Park S.H., Wang X., Weng Z., Li R., Bandodkar A.J., et al. Passive sweat collection and colorimetric analysis of biomarkers relevant to kidney disorders using a soft microfluidic system. Lab Chip. 2019 doi: 10.1039/C9LC00103D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Gao W., Emaminejad S., Nyein H.Y.Y., Challa S., Chen K., Peck A., Fahad H.M., Ota H., Shiraki H., Kiriya D., et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature. 2016 doi: 10.1038/nature16521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Schazmann B., Morris D., Slater C., Beirne S., Fay C., Reuveny R., Moyna N., Diamond D. A wearable electrochemical sensor for the real-time measurement of sweat sodium concentration. Anal. Methods. 2010 doi: 10.1039/b9ay00184k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Glennon T., O’Quigley C., McCaul M., Matzeu G., Beirne S., Wallace G.G., Stroiescu F., O’Mahoney N., White P., Diamond D. ‘SWEATCH’: A Wearable Platform for Harvesting and Analysing Sweat Sodium Content. Electroanalysis. 2016 doi: 10.1002/elan.201600106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Tai L.C., Gao W., Chao M., Bariya M., Ngo Q.P., Shahpar Z., Nyein H.Y.Y., Park H., Sun J., Jung Y., et al. Methylxanthine Drug Monitoring with Wearable Sweat Sensors. Adv. Mater. 2018 doi: 10.1002/adma.201707442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Tanenbaum A.S., Wetherall D.J. Computer Networks. World Wide Web Internet Web Inf. Syst. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2008.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Schneier B. Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; New York, NY, USA: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 108.Kaufman C., Perlman R., Spencer M. Network Security Private Communication in a Public World. Prentice Hall; Westford, MA, USA: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 109.Kishimura A., Yamashita T., Yamaguchi K., Aida T. Rewritable phosphorescent paper by the control of competing kinetic and thermodynamic self-assembling events. Nat. Mater. 2005 doi: 10.1038/nmat1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Mutai T., Satou H., Araki K. Reproducible on-off switching of solid-state luminescence by controlling molecular packing through heat-mode interconversion. Nat. Mater. 2005 doi: 10.1038/nmat1454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Perruchas S., Goff X.F.L., Maron S., Maurin I., Guillen F., Garcia A., Gacoin T., Boilot J.P. Mechanochromic and thermochromic luminescence of a copper iodide cluster. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010 doi: 10.1021/ja103431d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Yoon S.J., Chung J.W., Gierschner J., Kim K.S., Choi M.G., Kim D., Park S.Y. Multistimuli two-color luminescence switching via different slip-stacking of highly fluorescent molecular sheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010 doi: 10.1021/ja1044665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Yan D., Lu J., Ma J., Wei M., Evans D.G., Duan X. Reversibly thermochromic, fluorescent ultrathin films with a supramolecular architecture. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011 doi: 10.1002/anie.201003015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Li K., Xiang Y., Wang X., Li J., Hu R., Tong A., Tang B.Z. Reversible photochromic system based on rhodamine B salicylaldehyde hydrazone metal complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014 doi: 10.1021/ja411689w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Sun H., Liu S., Lin W., Zhang K.Y., Lv W., Huang X., Huo F., Yang H., Jenkins G., Zhao Q., et al. Smart responsive phosphorescent materials for data recording and security protection. Nat. Commun. 2014 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Wu Y., Xie Y., Zhang Q., Tian H., Zhu W., Li A.D.Q. Quantitative photoswitching in bis(dithiazole)ethene enables modulation of light for encoding optical signals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:2090–2094. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Sarkar T., Selvakumar K., Motiei L., Margulies D. Message in a molecule. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:1–9. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ratner T., Reany O., Keinan E. Encoding and processing of alphanumeric information by chemical mixtures. ChemPhysChem. 2009;10:3303–3309. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200900520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Palacios M.A., Benito-Pena E., Manesse M., Mazzeo A.D., LaFratta C.N., Whitesides G.M., Walt D.R. InfoBiology by printed arrays of microorganism colonies for timed and on-demand release of messages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109554108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kim K.W., Bocharova V., Halámek J., Oh M.K., Katz E. Steganography and encrypting based on immunochemical systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011;108:1100–1107. doi: 10.1002/bit.23017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Shoshani S., Piran R., Arava Y., Keinan E. A molecular cryptosystem for images by DNA computing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:2883–2887. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Poje J.E., Kastratovic T., Macdonald A.R., Guillermo A.C., Troetti S.E., Jabado O.J., Fanning M.L., Stefanovic D., Macdonald J. Visual displays that directly interface and provide read-outs of molecular states via molecular graphics processing units. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014 doi: 10.1002/anie.201402698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ling J., Naren G., Kelly J., Moody T.S., De Silva A.P. Building pH Sensors into Paper-Based Small-Molecular Logic Systems for Very Simple Detection of Edges of Objects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:3763–3766. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Ling J., Naren G., Kelly J., Fox D.B., Prasanna De Silva A. Small molecular logic systems can draw the outlines of objects via edge visualization. Chem. Sci. 2015 doi: 10.1039/C5SC01537E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Zhang Y., Liu X., Sun M. DNA based random key generation and management for OTP encryption. BioSystems. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Clelland C.T., Risca V., Bancroft C. Hiding Data in DNA Microdots. Nature. 1999;399:533–534. doi: 10.1038/21092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Lustgarten O., Carmieli R., Motiei L., Margulies D. A Molecular Secret Sharing Scheme. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58:184–188. doi: 10.1002/anie.201809855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Srilatha N., Murali G. Fast three level DNA Cryptographic technique to provide better security; Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology, iCATccT 2016; Bangalore, India. 21–23 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 129.Malathi P., Manoaj M., Manoj R., Raghavan V., Vinodhini R.E. Highly Improved DNA Based Steganography. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2017;115:651–659. [Google Scholar]
- 130.Cherian A., Raj S.R., Abraham A. A Survey on different DNA Cryptographic Methods. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR) 2013;2:167–169. [Google Scholar]
- 131.Roy P., Dey D., De D., Sinha S. Cyber Security and Threats: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global; Hershey, PA, USA: 2018. DNA cryptography. [Google Scholar]
- 132.Halvorsen K., Wong W.P. Binary DNA Nanostructures for Data Encryption. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e44212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Marwan S., Shawish A., Nagaty K. DNA-based cryptographic methods for data hiding in DNA media. BioSystems. 2016;150:110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2016.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Huynh C., Brunelle E., Halámková L., Agudelo J., Halámek J. Forensic Identification of Gender from Fingerprints. Anal. Chem. 2015;87:11531–11536. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Brunelle E., Huynh C., Le A.M., Halámková L., Agudelo J., Halámek J. New Horizons for Ninhydrin: Colorimetric Determination of Gender from Fingerprints. Anal. Chem. 2016 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Brunelle E., Le A.M., Huynh C., Wingfield K., Halámková L., Agudelo J., Halámek J. Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 Dye: An Application for Forensic Fingerprint Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2017 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Brunelle E., Huynh C., Alin E., Eldridge M., Le A.M., Halámková L., Halámek J. Fingerprint Analysis: Moving Toward Multiattribute Determination via Individual Markers. Anal. Chem. 2018 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Agudelo J., Huynh C., Halámek J. Forensic determination of blood sample age using a bioaffinity-based assay. Analyst. 2015;140:1411–1415. doi: 10.1039/C4AN02269F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Agudelo J., Halámková L., Brunelle E., Rodrigues R., Huynh C., Halámek J. Ages at a Crime Scene: Simultaneous Estimation of the Time since Deposition and Age of Its Originator. Anal. Chem. 2016;88:6479–6484. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Huynh C., Brunelle E., Agudelo J., Halámek J. Bioaffinity-based assay for the sensitive detection and discrimination of sweat aimed at forensic applications. Talanta. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Hair M.E., Gerkman R., Mathis A.I., Halámková L., Halámek J. Noninvasive Concept for Optical Ethanol Sensing on the Skin Surface with Camera-Based Quantification. Anal. Chem. 2019 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Brunelle E., Halámek J. Biocomputing approach in forensic analysis. Int. J. Parallel Emergent Distrib. Syst. 2017 doi: 10.1080/17445760.2016.1140166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Moore S., Stein W.H. Photometric ninhydrin method for use in the chromatography of amino acids. J. Biol. Chem. 1948;178:367–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Meyer H. The ninhydrin reaction and its analytical applications. Biochem. J. 1957 doi: 10.1042/bj0670333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Walker J.M. Protein Protocols Handbook. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ, USA: 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 146.Halámek J., Bocharova V., Chinnapareddy S., Windmiller J.R., Strack G., Chuang M.C., Zhou J., Santhosh P., Ramirez G.V., Arugula M.A., et al. Multi-enzyme logic network architectures for assessing injuries: Digital processing of biomarkers. Mol. Biosyst. 2010;6:2554–2560. doi: 10.1039/c0mb00153h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Sakaguchi S. A new method for the colorimetric determination of arginine. J. Biochem. 1950 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a126191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Gibson L.E., Cooke R.E. A test for concentration of electrolytes in sweat in cystic fibrosis of the pancreas utilizing pilocarpine by iontophoresis. Pediatrics. 1959;23:545–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Hair M.E., Mathis A.I., Brunelle E.K., Halámková L., Halámek J. Metabolite Biometrics for the Differentiation of Individuals. Anal. Chem. 2018;90:5322–5328. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Agudelo J., Privman V., Halámek J. Promises and Challenges in Continuous Tracking Utilizing Amino Acids in Skin Secretions for Active Multi-Factor Biometric Authentication for Cybersecurity. ChemPhysChem. 2017;18:1714–1720. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201700044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.McGoldrick L.K., Weiss E.A., Halámek J. Symmetric-Key Encryption Based on Bioaffinity Interactions. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019 doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Park S.K., Miller K.W. Random number generators: Good ones are hard to find. Commun. ACM. 1988 doi: 10.1145/63039.63042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Leier A., Richter C., Banzhaf W., Rauhe H. Cryptography with DNA binary strands. BioSystems. 2000 doi: 10.1016/S0303-2647(00)00083-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Cox J.P.L. Long-term data storage in DNA. Trends Biotechnol. 2001;19:247–250. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(01)01671-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Gahlaut A., Bharti A., Dogra Y., Singh P. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Vol. 750 Springer; Singapore: 2017. DNA based cryptography. [Google Scholar]
- 156.Cui G., Wang Y., Han D., Wang Y., Wang Z., Wu Y. An encryption scheme based on DNA microdots technology. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2014 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-45049-9_13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Zhang Q., Guo L., Wei X. Image encryption using DNA addition combining with chaotic maps. Math. Comput. Model. 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.06.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

