Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2020 Jul 23;70(8):4668–4682. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004330

Six novel species of the obligate marine actinobacterium Salinispora, Salinispora cortesiana sp. nov., Salinispora fenicalii sp. nov., Salinispora goodfellowii sp. nov., Salinispora mooreana sp. nov., Salinispora oceanensis sp. nov. and Salinispora vitiensis sp. nov., and emended description of the genus Salinispora

Brenda Román-Ponce 1, Natalie Millán-Aguiñaga 2, Dulce Guillen-Matus 3, Alexander B Chase 3, Joape GM Ginigini 4, Katy Soapi 4, Klaus D Feussner 4, Paul R Jensen 3, Martha E Trujillo 1,*
PMCID: PMC7660244  PMID: 32701422

Abstract

Ten representative actinobacterial strains isolated from marine sediments collected worldwide were studied to determine their taxonomic status. The strains were previously identified as members of the genus Salinispora and shared >99 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to the three currently recognized Salinispora species. Comparative genomic analyses resulted in the delineation of six new species based on average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values below 95 and 70 %, respectively. The species status of the six new groups was supported by a core-genome phylogeny reconstructed from 2106 orthologs detected in 118 publicly available Salinispora genomes. Chemotaxonomic and physiological studies were used to complete the phenotypic characterization of the strains. The fatty acid profiles contained the major components iso-C16 : 0, C15 : 0, iso-17 : 0 and anteiso C17 : 0. Galactose and xylose were common in all whole-sugar patterns but differences were found between the six groups of strains. Polar lipid compositions were also unique for each species. Distinguishable physiological and biochemical characteristics were also recorded. The names proposed are Salinispora cortesiana sp. nov., CNY-202T (=DSM 108615T=CECT 9739T); Salinispora fenicalii sp. nov., CNT-569T (=DSM 108614T=CECT 9740T); Salinispora goodfellowii sp. nov., CNY-666T (=DSM 108616T=CECT 9738T); Salinispora mooreana sp. nov., CNT-150T (=DSM 45549T=CECT 9741T); Salinispora oceanensis sp. nov., CNT-138T (=DSM 45547T=CECT 9742T); and Salinispora vitiensis sp. nov., CNT-148T (=DSM 45548T=CECT 9743T).

Keywords: Salinispora, obligate marine, Actinobacteria

Introduction

The family Micromonosporaceae is a member of the order Micromonosporales [1] in the phylum Actinobacteria . This taxon consists of bacteria that stain Gram-positive and form non-fragmenting, branched and septate substrate hyphae; aerial mycelium being absent or scant. Members of Micromonosporaceae typically produce spores which may be motile or non-motile. These bacteria are further defined as aerobic, non-acid fast and mesophilic. Colonies have flat to elevated morphologies with smooth or wrinkled surfaces and show a variety of pigmentation. Many strains produce carotenoid mycelial pigments giving the colonies an orange to red appearance [2]. The type genus of the family is Micromonospora [1].

The genus Salinispora was placed in the family Micromonosporaceae as part of the description of Salinispora arenicola and Salinispora tropica [3]. Subsequently, a third species ( Salinispora pacifica ) was named [4]. Salinisporae were recognized as unique among actinobacteria in that strains failed to grow when seawater was replaced with deionized water in the growth medium [5]. Further investigations provided evidence for the genetic underpinnings of this phenotype, linking the loss of the mechanosensitive channel of large conductance gene (mscL) to the lack of growth following transfer to low osmotic strength media [6, 7]. Subsequent studies defined specific ions required for growth [8]. Members of the genus have been cultured from marine sediments collected around the globe [9], marine sponges [10] and other marine organisms [11]. Notably, salinisporae are a rich source of secondary metabolites and have become model organisms in the study of natural product biosynthesis and the development of new methods for natural product discovery [12].

Within the family Micromonosporaceae , Salinispora is closely related to Micromonospora , a bacterial genus that has been reported from both terrestrial habitats [13] and marine samples [3]. While Salinispora fail to grow when seawater is replaced with deionized water in the growth medium, Micromonospora strains with this physiological trait have yet to be reported, although some strains can tolerate up to 7 % (w/v) NaCl [14]. Apart from this important physiological distinction, the two micro-organisms share many commonalities, including morphological and chemotaxonomic traits, and thus cannot be easily distinguished based on phenotype features alone [1]. At the genetic level, Micromonospora and Salinispora strains also share high 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, thus creating challenges in resolving their phylogenetic relationships using this conserved marker. However, a recent classification of the family Micromonosporaceae based on whole-genome sequencing provided support for the separation of the two genera [15]. Moreover, subsequent phylogenomic analyses using additional Micromonospora type strains and Salinispora [13] further supported the conclusions reached by Carro and colleagues and revealed that Micromonospora pattaloongensis and Micromonospra pisi, which clade outside of the Micromonospora / Salinispora lineage, may need to be reclassified as a third genus.

Following precedent for the application of whole-genome sequencing to resolve phylogenetic relatedness among closely related strains, we sought to investigate species delineations within the genus Salinispora . Recent studies have suggested using >95 % average nucleotide identity (ANI) values to demarcate species boundaries [16, 17]. Indeed, a comparative genomic analysis of 119 Salinispora strains confirmed the established species designations of S. arenicola and S. tropica ; whereas the larger clade encompassing S. pacifica seemingly provided an underestimation of species relationships [18]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to employ polyphasic approaches to establish the taxonomic status within Salinispora by connecting fine-scale genetic diversity to phenotypic differences. Our results indicate that the members of the genus Salinispora analyzed here comprise nine species, including S. arenicola and S. tropica , and the reclassification of the larger clade that includes S. pacifica into six additional species.

Home habitat and isolation

Ten representative actinobacterial strains previously identified as members of the genus Salinispora were selected for this study based on the results of a prior comparative genomic analysis [18]. The strains were originally recovered from marine sediment samples collected from the Island of Palau in 2004 (CNS-237 and CNR-942), Fiji in 2006 (CNS-801, CNT-029, CNT-138T, CNT-148T, CNT-150T) and 2008 (CNT-569T), the Sea of Cortez in 2008 (CNY-202T), and the Madeira Islands in 2012 (CNY-666T) (Table 1). The strains were isolated using either dry/stamping or heat shock methods followed by plating on medium A1 (1 % soluble starch, 0.4 % yeast extract, 0.2 % peptone, 1.6 % agar, 100 % natural seawater) or SWA agar (1.6 % agar, 100 % natural seawater) and incubation for up to 16 weeks at room temperature as previously described [4, 19, 20]. Colonies were repeatedly streaked onto A1 medium until pure cultures were achieved as evidenced by uniform colony morphology. Purified strains were maintained at −80 °C in medium A1 (without agar) supplemented with 10 % glycerol as cryoprotectant.

Table 1.

Origin and geographic coordinates of the marine sediments from which the strains were derived

Strain

Sample no.

Origin

Isolation date

Isolation medium*

GPS coordinates

CNT-138 (DSM 45547)T

FJ06_138 #7

Fiji

July 2006

SWA

18° 45.667 S 178° 01.089 E

CNT-029

FJ06_30 #5

Fiji

July 2006

SWA

18° 24.374 S 178° 09.494 E

CNT-148 (DSM 45548)T

FJ06_154 #9

Fiji

July 2006

A1

18° 47.151 S 178° 33.155 E

CNS-801

FJ06-84 #1

Fiji

July 2006

A1

18° 42.806 S 178° 29.438 E

CNT-150 (DSM 45549)T

FJ06_32 #1

Fiji

July 2006

SWA

18° 25.301 S 178° 08.453 E

CNS-237

PL04-118 #2A

Palau

March 2004

10 % A1

na

CNT-569T

FJ08-173 #2

Fiji

February 2008

SWA

18° 15.26 S 178° 05.10 E

CNR-942

PL04-003 #1A

Palau

March 2004

10 % A1

07° 16 N 134° 28 E

CNY-202T

AMS-301

Sea of Cortez, Mexico

July 2008

na

25.9503217 N 111.306283 W

CNY-666T

MD12-107A

Madeira Island, Portugal

June 2012

50 % A1

32° 38.901 N 16° 49.365 W

*SWA, seawater agar (natural seawater, 1.6 % agar); M1, medium 1 [46]; A1 (peptone 0.2%, yeast extract 0.4%, starch 1%, Instant Ocean or natural seawater, agar 1.6%). na, not available.

16S rRNA gene phylogeny

To confirm affiliation with the genus Salinispora , we assessed the 16S rRNA gene of the 10 strains. Genomic DNA was obtained with the REDExtract-N-Amp Plant PCR kit (Sigma), amplified and sequenced as described previously [21]. The sequences for strains CNS-237, CNT-148T and CNT-029 were previously determined [20, 22] and directly downloaded from GenBank. Pairwise similarities between the 10 Salinispora strains and the type strains representing the three currently recognized Salinispora species ( S. pacifica CNR-114T, S. tropica CNB-440T and S. arenicola CNH-643T) were calculated using EzTaxon-e (http://eztaxon-e.ezbiocloud.net/) and aligned with clustal X (2.0) software [23]. Evolutionary distances were calculated according to Kimura’s two-parameter model [24] and phylogenetic trees reconstructed using the neighbour-joining [25] and maximum-likelihood methods [26] using the mega7 platform [27].

The 10 isolates shared >99 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to the three Salinispora type strains and the highest sequence similarity (99.8–99.9 %) to S. pacifica CNR-114T (Table S1, available in the online version of this article). A maximum-likelihood phylogeny reveals that the three Salinispora type strains form a well-supported clade that is distinct from representatives of the most closely related genera in the family Micromonosporaceae (Fig. 1). In this topology, all 10 strains belong to a large clade that includes S. pacifica CNR-114T; however, the phylogenetic relationships among these strains remain poorly resolved. A similar topology was observed using the neighbour-joining algorithm to reconstruct the tree (not shown).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Maximum-likelihood tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationships between the 10 Salinispora strains examined in this study, the currently described Salinispora species and select representatives of the family Micromonosporaceae . The Kimura two-parameter method was used to calculate distances. A total of 1323 positions were used following the elimination of gaps and missing data. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in mega 7. Bootstrap values above 50 % are shown at branching points. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Overall genomic relatedness indices and phylogenomics

Overall genomic relatedness indices [28] were used to assess the species level relationships among the Salinispora strains following the recommendation to use genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes [29]. Genome sequencing, assembly and annotation were performed as described previously [18, 30]. The genome sizes ranged from 4.97 Mb (CNS-801) to 6.61 Mb ( S. arenicola CNH-643T) with an average genome size of~5.5 Mb. The number of coding DNA regions (CDS) varied from 4668 (strain CNS-801) to 5521 (strain CNR-114T) (Table 2). G+C content was obtained directly from the genome sequence data output and ranged from 69.1 to 70.0 mol%.

Table 2.

Genome characteristics of the Salinispora strains studied here and the Salinispora arenicola , Salinispora pacifica and Salinispora tropica type strains

Strain

Genome size (Mb)

No. of Contigs

CDS

G+C content (mol%)

Sequencing depth

N50 value

Accession numbers

Reference

Salinispora arenicola CNH-643T

6.61

85

5056

69.4

289×

na

NZ_VFOL00000000

[47]

Salinispora tropica CNB-440T

5.18

1

4664

69.5

na

5 183 331

NC_009380

[30]

Salinispora pacifica CNR-114T

5.87

101

5521

69.7

na

137 332

NZ_AZWO00000000

[18]

CNT-138T

5.45

15

4981

69.7

na

1 212 913

NZ_ARTO00000000

[18]

CNT-029

5.24

45

4847

69.7

na

326 700

NZ_AZWB00000000

[18]

CNT-148T

5.10

10

4888

69.9

na

1 829 387

NZ_AQZE00000000

[18]

CNS-801

4.97

39

4668

69.9

321×

na

jgi_2561511036

[18]

CNT-150T

5.20

37

5060

69.3

na

512 538

NZ_AQZW0000000

[18]

CNS-237

5.24

77

4865

69.4

na

235 599

NZ_AUGH00000000

[18]

CNT-569T

5.23

48

4856

69.2

na

229 397

NZ_AZWQ00000000

[18]

CNR-942

5.47

60

5086

69.1

na

180 850

NZ_ARGG00000000

[18]

CNY-202T

5.18

204

5016

69.6

na

70 206

NZ_AXVR00000000

[18]

CNY-666T

5.73

106

5323

70.0

287×

na

jgi_2563366532

[18]

na, Not available.

Digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values were calculated with the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) version 2.0 available at https://ggdc.dsmz.de/ggdc.php following the settings previously recommended [31] and used to create a dDDH heatmap with the ComplexHeatmap R package version 1.17.1 [32]. The dDDH values provide initial support for the delineation of new Salinispora species (Fig. 2), specifically the delineation of the large clade that includes S. pacifica CNR-114T into six additional species. These new species were most closely related to S. pacifica CNR-114T, with dDDH values between 45.5–56.4 %, followed by S. tropica CNB-440T(41.4–44.5 %) and S. arenicola CNH-643T(32.2–33.4 %) (Table S2). The G+C content for the 10 strains ranged from 69.1 to 70.0 mol%, which is well within the range reported for the three currently recognized species ( S. arenicola , S. tropica and S. pacifica ).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Digital DNA–DNAhybridization pairwise comparison between the 10 Salinispora strains studied here and Salinispora arenicola CNH-643T, Salinispora tropica CNB-440T and Salinispora pacifica CNR-114T.

To support our classifications of the six proposed Salinispora species, we collated all publicly available Salinispora genomes (N=118), including the 10 strains assessed in this study. We first extracted the full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences from the genomes using Barrnap (https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap) and aligned each sequence with sina [33]. Pairwise comparisons of the fully aligned 16S rRNA gene region revealed high sequence similarity (>99 %) across all genomes, highlighting the difficulty in resolving fine-scale genetic diversity using conserved marker genes [34] . For instance, when we reconstructed a 16S rRNA gene phylogeny using RAxML version 8.0.0 [35], we found little taxonomic support and limited genetic resolution separating strains within Salinispora (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Maximum-likelihood Salinispora phylogenies. (a) 16S rRNA gene phylogeny and (b) core genome phylogeny (N=2011 genes, 118 strains) reconstructed using a GTR+GAMMA distribution with 100 bootstraps. The trees are coloured by proposed species designations with red triangles representing nodes with at least 70 and 90% support, for the 16S and genomic trees, respectively. *Denotes strains analysed in this study. (c) Distribution of pairwise whole-genome average nucleotide identity (ANI) values. Comparisons are coloured coded as intra- or inter-species using the proposed species designations. The first set of green peaks corresponds to comparisons between S. arenicola and the previously described species S. tropica and S. pacifica ; the second set of green peaks denotes the relationship between S. tropica and the major clade that includes the S. pacifica type strain. The ‘between S. pacifica ’ (red) comparisons represent inter-species ANI values between strains of the six new species proposed here and S. pacifica CNR-114T.

We sought to use whole-genome sequence data to resolve taxonomic relatedness within Salinispora . First, we assessed the core genome of 118 Salinispora strains by identifying all orthologous protein-coding genes. Orthologs were predicted using roary [36] with a minimum sequence identity of 85 %. The resulting 2106 orthologs were aligned with clustal_O version 1.2.3 [37] and screened for complete codon reading frames (i.e. multiple of 3 bp). The resulting 2011 orthologs were concatenated to create a 2.1 Mbp core genome for phylogenetic analysis with RAxML version 8.2.10 [35] using a general time reversal model with a gamma distribution for 100 replicates. The core genome phylogeny (Fig. 3b) clearly delineates Salinispora into nine well-supported lineages, including the separation of the large clade that includes S. pacifica CNR-114T into a total of seven clades, of which one includes the type strain.

Pairwise whole-genome ANI values were calculated across all 118 genomes using the enveomics package [38]. We observed a strong genetic discontinuity around the 95 % ANI value (Fig. 3c), the suggested boundary for species delineation in bacteria [17]. Pairwise comparisons <90 % ANI represent the divergence between the S. arenicola and S. tropica-pacifica clades (first green peak, Fig. 3c) and between S. tropica and the broader S. pacifica clade (second green peak). Notably, pairwise comparisons between the six new species proposed here all fall below the 95 % ANI threshold (red peaks, Fig. 3c), providing further genomic support for their proposed taxonomic status. When adjusted for the newly proposed species designations, all intra-species relationships fall above the 95 % ANI boundary (blue peaks, Fig. 3c). Pairwise ANI values of the three Salinispora type strains and the ten strains studied here are given in Table S3.

Chemotaxonomic and phenotypic characterization

For morphological, physiological and biochemical characterization, the Salinispora strains were compared under the same laboratory conditions unless otherwise indicated. The type strains for the three currently named species are included for comparison. All media were prepared using 75 % artificial seawater. Morphological and cultural characteristics were recorded on A1 agar and International Streptomyces Project media (ISP1–ISP7) [39] after 3 weeks of incubation at 28 °C. Growth at different temperatures (18, 22, 28, 37 and 44 °C) and pH (pH 6–9.5, at 0.5 pH unit intervals) was evaluated on A1 agar. Tolerance to NaCl was determined on ISP1 agar prepared with 75 % artificial seawater and supplemented with various NaCl concentrations (1–9 %, at intervals of 2 %). Utilization of several carbon sources was determined as previously described [40]. Production of oxidase, catalase and nitrate reductase, degradation of several compounds, and antibiotic resistance were evaluated following established methods [41]. All tests were done in triplicate and incubated at 28 °C (except temperature measurements) and recorded after 3 weeks. Other enzymatic activities were evaluated using API ZYM strips (bioMérieux) following the manufacturer’s instructions, with inocula prepared as previously described [4]. Additionally, the Salinispora genomes were screened for genes coding for proteins related with the biochemical and physiological assays carried out in the laboratory (Table 3).

Table 3.

Phenotypic features of putative novel species and the current Salinispora type strains

Characteristics‡

Salinispora arenicola CNH-643T

Salinispora tropica CNB-440T

Salinispora pacifica CNR-114T

CNT-138T

CNT-029

CNT-148T

CNS-801

CNT-150T

CNS-237

CNT-569T

CNR-942

CNY-202T

CNY-666T

Environmental parameters

Optimum temperature for growth (°C)

28–37

28

28

28

28

28–37

28–37

28

28–37

28

28

28–37

28

Growth at 18 °C

+

+

+

+

Growth at 37 °C

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Optimum pH for growth

8.0

8.0

8.0

7.5–9.5

6.5–7.5

8.0–9.0

7.0–9.5

8

7.5–9.5

8.0

7.5–8.0

7.5–9.0

8–9.5

Growth at pH 6.0

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Growth with NaCl (%)

3

5*

5†

3

5*

5†

5*

5†

5*

5*

1

3

5†

Carbon sources

l-Glutamic acid

+

+

w

+

+

+

w

+

w

+

w

w

+

Arbutin

w

+

w

w

+

+

+

+

+

w

w

+

+

Cellobiose

+

+

w

w

+

+

w

w

+

+

d-Fructose

+

+

w

+

+

w

w

w

w

w

w

Galactose

+

+

w

+

+

+

w

w

+

+

+

myo-Inositol

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

w

w

d-Mannose

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

+

+

Melezitose

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

l-Rhamnose

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Trehalose

+

+

w

+

+

+

+

w

+

+

+

+

+

d-Salicin

+

w

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Sorbose

w

+

+

+

w

w

w

w

Xylose

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

w

API ZYM tests

Alkaline phosphatase

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

w

+

Esterase (C4)

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

+

+

Esterase lipase (C8)

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

+

+

Cystine arylamidase

+

+

w

+

w

+

+

+

+

+

+

Trypsin

w

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

α-Chymotrypsin

+

+

+

+

w

+

w

Acid phosphatase

w

w

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

+

Naphthol-AS-BI-Phosphohydrolase

+

+

w

+

+

w

+

+

+

+

α-Glucosidase

+

+

+

w

w

+

w

+

+

+

+

+

β-Glucosidase

+

+

+

w

+

+

+

+

+

+

N-Acetyl-β-glucosaminidase

+

+

+

w

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

α-Mannosidase

+

+

w

+

+

+

Degradation (w/v)

Casein 1%

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

+

Tween 20 1%

+

+

w

w

+

Tween 80 1%

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Resistance (μg)

Ciprofloxacin (5)

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

+

Erythromycin (2)

+

w

+

+

Gentamicin (10)

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

+

w

+

Neomicin (30)

+

Polymycin B (30)

+

w

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

+

Tetracycline (30)

+

+

w

+

+

Other

Oxidase

+

+

+

Nitrate reduction

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

w

+

+

Nitrite reduction

w

w

w

w

w

+

+

*Strains CNB-440T, CNT-029, CNS-801 and CNT-569T grow weakly at 9 % NaCl (w/v).

†Strains CNR-114T, CNT-148T, CNT-150T and CNY-666T grow weakly at 7 % NaCl (w/v).

‡Positive; −, negative; w, weak. No growth observed at 44 °C.

For chemotaxonomic analyses, biomass was obtained by growing strains in M1 broth (DSMZ medium 1065: 1 % soluble starch, 0.4 % yeast extract, 0.2 % peptone, 2 % NaCl, 100 % natural seawater; www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/medium/pdf/DSMZ_Medium1065.pdf) at 28 °C for 10–14 days under shaking (120 r.p.m.) conditions. Strains CNT-138T, CNT-148T, CNT-150T, CNT-569T, CNY-202T and CNY-666T were selected to determine whole-cell sugar, polar lipid and fatty acid profiles using standard procedures [4, 42–44]. Fatty acids were analysed by GLC using the Microbial Identification System (midi) with the Microbial Identification software package (Sherlock version 4.5) and peaks were named using the actino database (http://www.actinobase.in/).

The strains grew as non-fragmenting, branched substrate hyphae and without production of aerial mycelia. They showed moderate to abundant growth on all ISP media except ISP6, where only scant growth was observed for strains CNS-801 and CNS-237. On these media, the colour of the substrate mycelium ranged from cream, light orange and orange, turning to dark brown on sporulation (Table S4, Fig. S1). Five strains ( S. arenicola CNH-643T, S. tropica CNB-440T, CNT-138T, CNT-029 and CNS-237) produced a brown diffusible pigment on ISP1 after 2 weeks incubation; strain CNY-666T showed a brown diffusible pigment on ISP5 and ISP7 media after 3 weeks of growth.

Salinispora strains are mesophilic with an optimum growth temperature between 28–37 °C, while at temperatures below 20 °C growth is variable. Neutral to lightly alkaline pH supports good growth of salinisporae while at pH 6 only 50 % of the strains showed evidence of growth. All strains studied are halophiles considering that all were tolerant to at least 1 % (w/v) NaCl, which was added to the basal medium already containing 75 % artificial seawater (ASW). Several strains showed weak growth at 7 and 9 % (w/v) NaCl addition to the 75 % ASW (Table 3). Seven of the 16 carbon sources tested were assimilated by all Salinispora strains (l-alanine, l-glutamic acid, arbutin, lactose, myo-inositol, d-sorbitol and trehalose) while variable results were found for the remaining 11 sources tested. All strains studied produced catalase but were variable for the production oxidase. Nitrate and nitrite reduction activity was also variable. All strains also produced amylases and chitinases for the degradation of starch and colloidal chitin but were variable for the degradation of other compounds tested. The enzymes leucine and valine arylamidase were also produced by all strains while production of α- and β-galactosidase, and β-glucuronidase was not detected. Resistance to several antibiotics was also variable, but all strains grew in the presence of ampicillin (2 µg). A summary of the tests to help differentiate between all Salinispora species is given in Table 3. The correlation of the genome-predicted phenotypes and the results obtained in the laboratory are presented in Table S5. Good congruence was found between the in silico and in vitro data; however, in several cases the target gene was found but no functionality was detected under the laboratory conditions tested, or a positive phenotype was observed but it was not possible to link this activity to the genome sequence. Nevertheless, genomic data can be considered a good starting point to determine genotypic profiles to predict stable phenotypic features that can be useful to differentiate between species.

Indeed, an analysis into the genomic potential to degrade various carbohydrates, ranging from oligosaccharides to polymeric substrates such as chitin, correlated significantly with the proposed species designations (Mantel test; r=0.25, P value<0.005). Specifically, we searched all Salinispora genomes (N=118) for the presence of glycoside hydrolase (GH) and carbohydrate binding module (CBM) proteins, as previously described [45]. We used a Jaccard distance matrix to compute a neighbour-joining dendrogram and visualized the abundance of GH and CBM protein families across Salinispora strains as a heatmap (Fig. 4). Together with the phenotypic assays, these results suggest that carbohydrate metabolism is a key functional trait that delineates the species.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Genomic potential to produce extracellular enzymes for carbohydrate degradation, specifically glycoside hydrolases (GH) and carbohydrate binding module (CBM) proteins. Heatmap shows abundance of GH and CBM protein families across genomes. Dendrogram shows similarity in abundance of GH/CBM family composition among strains. Red triangles indicate nodes with ≥50 % support. Strains are coloured by proposed species designations.

The chemotaxonomic markers analysed also confirmed the affiliation of the six representative strains to the genus Salinispora as these were in agreement with those reported earlier [3, 4]. The fatty acid profiles (Table 4) contained the major fatty acid iso-C16 : 0 (12.3–49.8 %), followed by iso-C15 : 0, iso-C17 : 0 and anteiso-C17 : 0. With respect to their whole-sugar profile, galactose and xylose were common to all strains but the presence of arabinose, glucose and ribose varied, with strains CNT-138T, CNT-148T, CNT-150T and CNY-666T containing all sugars while strains CNT-569T and CNY-202T lacked arabinose. Differences were also found in the polar lipid composition of the nine type strains, nevertheless the lipids diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylinositol were common to all strains while the presence of phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylmethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol mannoside and two unidentified glycolipids varied (Figs S2–S7). A summary of the overall chemotaxonomic profiles is compiled in Table 4.

Table 4.

Chemotaxonomic traits of the three named Salinispora species and the six type strains described in this work

Strains: 1, Salinispora arenicola CNH-643T; 2, Salinispora tropica CNB-440T; 3, Salinispora pacifica CNR-114T; 4, Salinispora oceanensis sp. nov. CNT-138T; 5, Salinispora vitiensis sp. nov. CNT-148T; 6, Salinispora mooreana sp. nov. CNT-150T; 7, Salinispora fenicalii sp. nov. CNT-569T; 8, Salinispora cortesiana sp. nov. CNY-202T; 9, Salinispora goodfellowii sp. nov. CNY-666T. Fatty acid analyses were carried out under the same conditions, cells were grown for 14 days on TSBA supplemented with 75 % seawater at 28 °C. Data expressed as percentages of total fatty acids. Major components (≥5 %) in bold type. Peaks that accounted for less than 2 % of total fatty acid composition are not included; − not detected.

Chemotaxonomic traits

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Fatty acid

iso-C15 : 0

8.9

5.9

12.1

11.0

9.8

12.5

16.2

7.9

11.5

anteiso-C15 : 0

2.5

2.4

4.1

9.6

C15 : 0

4.4

7.0

2.1

2.7

3.4

iso-C16 : 0

44.8

49.8

15.6

26.6

23.8

21.1

12.3

15.3

21.1

C16 : 0

2.9

C16 : 0 9-methyl

4.8

4.6

7.2

3.5

5.3

iso-C17 : 0

5.1

3.6

8.6

3.3

5.3

13.3

8.5

14.9

3.0

anteiso-C17 : 0

2.9

2.15

8.4

3.4

4.8

5.8

7.0

10.1

6.9

cis-C17 : 1 9

3.1

9.8

6.8

4.7

11.4

3.9

16.7

C17 : 0

9.9

13.0

11.1

5.5

11.8

9.0

12.5

C16 : 1 2-OH

6.5

2.29

C17 : 0 10-methyl

7.2

2.2

2.9

6.1

8.5

5.1

7.8

iso-C18 : 0

2.4

2.2

cis-C18 : 1 9

4.4

4.3

3.0

7.0

 −

3.0

C18 : 0

3.7

3.2

2.1

2.9

 −

 −

iso-C18 : 0 10-methyl

2.9

 −

 −

 −

 −

 −

 −

 −

TBSA-C18 : 0 10-methyl

2.6

 −

 −

 −

5.7

 −

 −

2.2

 −

C19 : 0

 −

 −

 −

4.0

 −

Summed feature 8*

0.50

 −

3.4

 −

3.5

2.8

2.2

5.3

 −

Major whole-cell sugars

Arabinose

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Glucose

+

+

+

+

+

+

Galactose

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Ribose

+

+

+

+

+

+

Xylose

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

Polar lipids†

DPG

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

PME

+

PE

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

PG

+

+

+

+

+

+

PI

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

PIM

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

GL1

+

+

+

+

+

+

GL2

+

+

GL3

+

+

+

*Summed feature 8 consists of unidentified lipid 18.756/19 : 1.

†DPG, diphosphatidylglycerol; PME, diphosphatidylmethylethanolamine, PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PIM, phosphatidylinositolmannoside; GL1, GL2, GL3, unidentified mannose-containing lipids.

Conclusions

The results derived from this study support the proposal of six new Salinispora species as shown by the genomic and phenotypic data presented. At the genomic level, ANI and dDDH values indicate that these strains should be recognized as new genomic species, while chemotaxonomic, physiological and biochemical characteristics clearly show that all strains are distinguishable (Tables 3 and 4). With the present proposal, the number of Salinispora species increases from three to nine. The genus is also emended based on the new data presented in this study.

Emended description of the genus Salinispora Maldonado et al. 2005

The emended description of the genus is based on that given by Maldonado et al. [3] with the following modifications: major amounts of galactose and xylose in whole-organism hydrolysates, the presence of arabinose is variable; predominant fatty acids are iso-C16 : 0 and iso-C15 : 0; major polar lipids include diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylinositol, presence of phosphatidylglycerol is variable; G+C content of the DNA lies within the range 69.1–70 mol% based on genome sequence.

Description of Salinispora cortesiana sp. nov.

Salinispora cortesiana (cor.te.si.a'na. N.L. fem. adj. cortesiana of Córtes, referring to Sea of Córtez).

Gram-stain-positive, aerobic, non-acid-fast actinobacterium. Fine vegetative hyphae are branched and not fragmented. Colonies are pale orange on A1 medium and appear after incubation for 2 weeks. Aerial mycelium is absent. For growth, deionized water must be replaced with seawater in culture media. After 3 weeks incubation, good growth is observed on ISP1 and ISP3 media, weak growth is seen on ISP4, ISP5 and ISP7, and no growth on ISP2 or ISP6. The temperature range for growth is 18–37 °C (optimum, 28–37 °C); pH for growth ranged from pH 6.5 to 9.0. Grows in the presence of 3 % NaCl. Catalase-positive and oxidase-negative. Starch and chitin are hydrolysed but not casein, Tween 20, Tween 80, l-tyrosine or urea. Nitrite and nitrate are reduced. Substrates used as carbon sources include arbutin, d-galactose, lactose, d-mannose, melezitose, l-rhamnose, d-sorbitol and trehalose. l-Alanine, d-fructose, l-glutamic acid, myo-inositol and d-xylose are utilized weakly. Substrates which cannot be used as carbon sources are cellobiose, d-salicin and sorbose. Whole-cell sugars are glucose, galactose, ribose and xylose. Diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylinositolmannoside are part of the polar lipid composition. The major fatty acids (≥5 %) are iso-C15 : 0, iso-C16 : 0, C16 : 0 9-methyl, iso-C17 : 0, anteiso-C17 : 0, C17 : 0, C17 : 0 10 methyl and summed feature 8.

The type strain is CNY-202T (=DSM 108615T=CECT 9739T) and was isolated from a marine sediment collected at 330 m of depth in the Sea of Cortez, Mexico. The DNA G+C content of the type strain is 69.6 mol% (WGS).

16S rRNA gene sequence accession number: MH973616.

WGS accession number: NZ_AXVR00000000.

Description of Salinispora fenicalii sp. nov.

Salinispora fenicalii (fe.ni.ca´li.i N.L. gen. n. fenicalii, in honor of William Fenical, an American scientist who has greatly contributed to the study of marine natural products from Salinispora ).

Gram-stain-positive, aerobic, non-acid- fast actinobacterium. Fine vegetative non-fragmenting hyphae. Substrate mycelium color varies from bright to dark orange. Aerial mycelium is absent. Colonies are raised and folded after 2 weeks of incubation on A1 media at 28 °C. Requires at least 75 % seawater for growth. After 3 weeks of incubation, good growth was observed on ISP1; moderate on ISP3 and ISP7; poor on ISP2, ISP4 and variable on ISP5 media. On ISP6 media growth is not observed. The temperature range for growth is 18–37 °C (optimum, 28 °C), whereas, the optimum pH is 8 (range, from pH 6.0 to 9.5). Grows in the presence of 5 % NaCl (type strain). Catalase-positive and oxidase-negative. Starch and chitin are hydrolysed but casein and Tween 80 hydrolysis are variable. Urea, l-tyrosine and Tween 20 are not degraded. Nitrate is reduced, but nitrite reduction is variable. Substrates used as carbon sources are arbutin, cellobiose, d-fructose, l-glutamic acid, myo-inositol, lactose, d-salicin and trehalose but the assimilation of l-alanine, d-galactose, d-mannose, melezitose, l-rhamnose, d-sorbitol and d-xylose is variable. Sorbose cannot be used as a carbon source. Whole-cell sugars are glucose, galactose, ribose and xylose. Polar lipids composition includes diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylinositolmannoside. The major fatty acids (≥5 %) are iso-C15 : 0, iso-C16 : 0, iso-C17:0, C17 : 0 and cis- C17 : 19. The G+C content is 69.1–69.2 mol% (WGS).

The type strain, CNT-569T (=DSM 108614T=CECT 9740T), and an additional representative, CNR-942, were isolated from marine sediment collected from the Islands of Fiji and Palau, respectively.

16S rRNA gene sequence accession numbers are MH973615 (strain CNT-569T) and MH973613 (CNR-942).

WGS accession number: NZ_AZWQ00000000 (strain CNT-569T) and NZ_ARGG00000000 (strain CNR-942).

Description of Salinispora goodfellowii sp. nov.

Salinispora goodfellowii (good.fel.low'i.i. N.L. gen. n. goodfellowii, named in honour of Michael Goodfellow for his contribution to actinobacterial systematics and description of the genus Salinispora ).

Gram-stain-positive, aerobic, non-acid-fast actinobacterium. Fine vegetative hyphae are branched and non-fragmented. Colonies are orange and folded on A1 medium and appear after incubation for 2 weeks. Aerial mycelium is absent. For growth, deionized water must be replaced with seawater in the culture media. After 3 weeks of incubation, good growth is observed in all ISP media, with exception of ISP6. A diffusible brown pigment is observed on ISP5 and ISP7 media. Growth occurs at 28 °C (no growth at 18 and 37 °C) and pH 6.0–9.5. Grows in the presence of 5 % NaCl. Catalase-positive but oxidase-negative. Starch and chitin are hydrolysed but not casein, urea, l-tyrosine, Tween 20 or Tween 80. Nitrate and nitrite are reduced. l-Alanine, arbutin, cellobiose, d-galactose, l-glutamic acid, d-mannose, melezitose, l-rhamnose, d-salicin, sorbitol and trehalose are used as carbon sources, while d-fructose, lactose, myo-inositol, sorbose and d-xylose are weakly used. Contains arabinose, glucose, galactose, ribose and xylose as whole-cell sugars. Polar lipids are diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidyl inositol mannoside. Main fatty acids are iso-C15 : 0, anteiso-C15 : 0, iso-C16 : 0, anteiso-C17:0, C17 : 0 and cis-C17:19. The G+C content is 70 mol% (WGS).

The type strain CNY-666T (=DSM 108616T=CECT 9738T) was isolated from a marine sediment collected from the Madeira Islands (Portugal).

16S rRNA gene sequence accession number: MH973617.

WGS accession number: jgi_2563366532.

Description of Salinispora mooreana sp. nov.

Salinispora mooreana (moo.re.a'na. N.L. fem. adj. mooreana, in honor of Bradley Moore, an American scientist who has greatly contributed to the study of natural product biosynthesis in Salinispora ).

Gram-stain-positive, aerobic, non-acid-fast actinobacterium. Fine vegetative hyphae are branched and not fragmented. On A1 medium after 2 weeks, colonies vary from light to bright orange, turning black upon sporulation. Aerial mycelium is absent. For growth, deionized water must be replaced with sea water. Good growth is observed on ISP1 and ISP3 media; moderate on ISP2. Grows at 28 °C; growth at 37 °C is variable (no growth at 18 °C). pH growth range is 6.5–9.5 (optimum, pH 8). Grows in the presence of 5 % NaCl. Catalase-positive but oxidase-negative. Starch, chitin and Tween 80 are hydrolysed, while Tween 20 and casein are variable. Urea and l-tyrosine are not hydrolysed. Nitrate is reduced while nitrite reduction is variable. l-Alanine, arbutin, cellobiose, l-glutamic acid, lactose, melezitose, myo-inositol, l-rhamnose, d-salicin, sorbitol, trehalose and d-xylose as used as carbon sources while d-fructose, d-galactose and sorbose are weakly used. Whole-cell sugars detected are arabinose, glucose, galactose, ribose and xylose. Diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylinositol mannoside are main polar lipids. Major fatty acids are iso-C15 : 0, iso-C16 : 0, C16 : 0 9 methyl, iso-C17 : 0, anteiso-C17:0, C17 : 0 and C17 : 0 10 methyl. The G+C content is 69.3–69.4 mol% (WGS).

The type strain, CNT-150T (=DSM 45549T=CECT 9741T), was isolated from a marine sediment collected in Fiji, while strain CNS-237 was isolated from a marine sediment collected in Palau.

16S rRNA gene sequence accession numbers: HQ642900 (CNT-150T) and DQ318246 (CNS-237).

WGS accession numbers: NZ_AQZW00000000 (strain CNT-150T) and NZ_AUGH00000000 (strain CNS-237).

Description of Salinispora oceanensis sp. nov.

Salinispora oceanensis (o.ce.an.en'sis. L. fem. adj. oceanensis, of the ocean).

Gram-stain-positive, aerobic actinobacterium. Fine vegetative hyphae are branched and not fragmented. After 2 weeks, colonies are orange on A1 medium, turning brown upon sporulation. Aerial mycelium is absent. For growth, deionized water must be replaced with sea water. After 3 weeks, good growth is observed on ISP1 and ISP3, poor to moderate on ISP5 and moderate to good on ISP7 media. No growth is observed on ISP6 agar. Brown diffusible pigment is produced on ISP1 agar after 2 weeks. Growth occurs between 28–37 °C (optimum, 28 °C); pH growth range is pH 6–9.5 (optimum, pH 7.5–9.5). Grows in the presence of 3 % NaCl. Catalase and oxidase are positive. Casein, chitin, starch and Tween 80 are hydrolysed; Tween 20 degradation is variable. Hydrolysis of urea and l-tyrosine are negative. Nitrate is reduced, but nitrite reduction is variable. The following substrates are used as carbon sources: arbutin, galactose, l-glutamic acid, l-alanine, myo-inositol, lactose, d-mannose, melezitose, l-rhamnose, trehalose and sorbitol. Cellobiose is utilized weakly. Variable carbon source assimilation for d-fructose, d-salicin, sorbose and d-xylose. Whole-cell sugars detected arabinose, galactose, glucose, ribose and xylose. Polar lipid composition is diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylinositol mannoside. Major fatty acids are iso-C15 : 0, C15 : 0, iso-C16:0, C17 : 0, cis-C17 : 19 and C17 : 0 10 methyl. The G+C content is 69.7 mol% (WGS).

The type strain, CNT-138T (=DSM 45547T=CECT 9742T), and strain CNT-029 were isolated from marine sediments collected from the Fiji Islands.

16S rRNA gene sequence accession numbers: HQ642853 (strain CNT-138T) and HQ642852 (strain CNT-029).

WGS accession number: NZ_ARTO00000000 (strain CNT-138T) and NZ_AZWB00000000 (strain CNT-029).

Description of Salinispora vitiensis sp. nov

Salinispora vitiensis (vi.ti.en'sis. N.L. fem. adj. vitiensis, from Viti Levu, native name for Fiji, where the type strain was isolated).

Gram-stain-positive, aerobic, non-acid-fast actinobacterium. Vegetative hyphae are branched and not fragmented. Colonies are dark orange or brown on A1 medium and appear after incubation for 2 weeks. Aerial mycelium is absent. For growth, necessarily deionized water must be replaced with seawater. Good growth is observed on ISP1 and ISP3, poor on ISP2, moderate on ISP4, poor to moderate on ISP5, and moderate to good on ISP7 media. The temperature range for growth is 22–37 °C (optimum, 28–37 °C). pH growth range pH 7.0–9.5 (optimum; pH 8.0–9.0, type strain). Grows in the presence of 5 % NaCl. Catalase-positive and oxidase-negative. Casein, starch, chitin and Tween 80 are hydrolysed but not urea, l-tyrosine or Tween 20. Nitrate is reduced, but nitrite reduction is variable. Utilizes l- alanine, arbutin, d-fructose, d-galactose, l-glutamic acid, myo-inositol, lactose, d-mannose, melezitose, trehalose, d-salicin, d-sorbitol and sorbose as carbon sources; utilization of l-glutamic acid, cellobiose, l-rhamnose, sorbose and d-xylose is variable. Whole-cell sugars are arabinose, glucose, galactose, ribose and xylose. Diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylinositol mannoside are the main polar lipids. Major cellular fatty acids are iso-C15 : 0, iso-C16:0, C17 : 0, iso-C17 : 0 and cis-C17 : 19, while C16 : 0 9 methyl, C17 : 0 10 methyl and cis-C18 : 19 are variable. The G+C content is 69.9 mol%.

The type strain, CNT-148T (=DSM 45548T=CECT 9743T), and strain CNS-801 were isolated from marine sediments collected from the Fiji Islands.

16S rRNA gene sequence accession number: HQ642899 from CNT-148T and MH973614 from CNS-801.

WGS accession number: NZ_AQZE00000000 (strain CNT-148T) and jgi_2561511036 (CNS-801).

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1

Funding information

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (2U19TW007401 and 5R01GM085770) and Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (PGC2018-096185-B-I00).

Acknowledgements

N.M.-A. acknowledges a graduate fellowship from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT-213497), B.R.P. acknowledges a posdoctoral fellowship from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT-323687). Susana Gaudêncio (REQUIMTE, LAQV) and the Portuguese funding agency FCT/MEC (grant PTDC/QUI-QUI/119116/2010 and IF/00700/2014) are acknowledged for support of sample acquisition from the Madeira Islands, PT. Chris Kauffman is acknowledged for assistance with sample collection and strain isolation. Genome sequencing was conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute and supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02- 05CH11231. We gratefully acknowledge the people of Fiji for their hospitality and permission to collect samples in their local waters and J. Ginigini (University of the South Pacific) and M. Hay (Georgia Institute of Technology) for facilitating the field research. We thank Maite Ortuzar for help with scanning electron microscopy work.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest

Footnotes

The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequence and draft whole genome sequences for strains CNY-202T, CNT-569T, CNY-666T, CNT-150T, CNT-138T and CNT-148T are: MH973616, MH973615, MH973617, HQ642900, HQ642853 and HQ642899 and NZ_AXVR00000000, NZ_AZWQ00000000, jgi_2563366532, NZ_AQZW0000000, NZ_ARTO00000000 and NZ_AQZE00000000, respectively.

Eight supplementary figures and five supplementary tables are available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.Genilloud O. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. 2015. Micromonosporaceae; pp. 1–7. pp. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Trujillo ME, Hong K, Genilloud O. The Prokaryotes - Actinobacteria. Berlin: Springer; 2014. The Family Micromonosporaceae; pp. 499–569.978-3-642-30138-4 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maldonado LA, Fenical W, Jensen PR, Kauffman CA, Mincer TJ, et al. Salinispora arenicola gen. nov., sp. nov. and Salinispora tropica sp. nov., obligate marine actinomycetes belonging to the family Micromonosporaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:1759–1766. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63625-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ahmed L, Jensen PR, Freel KC, Brown R, Jones AL, et al. Salinispora pacifica sp. nov., an actinomycete from marine sediments. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2013;103:1069–1078. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-9886-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mincer TJ, Jensen PR, Kauffman CA, Fenical W. Widespread and persistent populations of a major new marine actinomycete taxon in ocean sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:5005–5011. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.10.5005-5011.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bucarey SA, Penn K, Paul L, Fenical W, Jensen PR. Genetic complementation of the obligate marine actinobacterium Salinispora tropica with the large mechanosensitive channel gene mscL rescues cells from osmotic downshock. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:4175–4182. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00577-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Penn K, Jensen PR. Comparative genomics reveals evidence of marine adaptation in Salinispora species. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tsueng G, Lam KS. A preliminary investigation on the growth requirement for monovalent cations, divalent cations and medium ionic strength of marine actinomycete Salinispora . Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:1525–1534. doi: 10.1007/s00253-009-2424-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jensen PR, Mafnas C. Biogeography of the marine actinomycete Salinispora . Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:1881–1888. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vidgen ME, Hooper JNA, Fuerst JA, Fuerst JA. Diversity and distribution of the bioactive actinobacterial genus Salinispora from sponges along the great barrier reef. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;101:603–618. doi: 10.1007/s10482-011-9676-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jensen PR, Gontang E, Mafnas C, Mincer TJ, Fenical W. Culturable marine actinomycete diversity from tropical Pacific Ocean sediments. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1039–1048. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00785.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jensen PR, Moore BS, Fenical W. The marine actinomycete genus Salinispora: a model organism for secondary metabolite discovery. Nat Prod Rep. 2015;32:738–751. doi: 10.1039/C4NP00167B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Riesco R, Carro L, Román-Ponce B, Prieto C, Blom J, et al. Defining the species Micromonospora saelicesensis and Micromonospora noduli under the framework of genomics. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carro L, Pukall R, Spröer C, Kroppenstedt RM, Trujillo ME. Micromonospora halotolerans sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of a Pisum sativum plant. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2013;103:1245–1254. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-9903-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Carro L, Nouioui I, Sangal V, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Trujillo ME, et al. Genome-Based classification of micromonosporae with a focus on their biotechnological and ecological potential. Sci Rep. 2018;8:525. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17392-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ani analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Millán-Aguiñaga N, Chavarria KL, Ugalde JA, Letzel A-C, Rouse GW, et al. Phylogenomic insight into Salinispora (bacteria, actinobacteria) species designations. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02845-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gontang EA, Fenical W, Jensen PR. Phylogenetic diversity of Gram-positive bacteria cultured from marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:3272–3282. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02811-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Freel KC, Edlund A, Jensen PR. Microdiversity and evidence for high dispersal rates in the marine actinomycete 'Salinispora pacifica'. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:480–493. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02641.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Trujillo ME, Alonso-Vega P, Rodríguez R, Carro L, Cerda E, et al. The genus Micromonospora is widespread in legume root nodules: the example of Lupinus angustifolius . Isme J. 2010;4:1265. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jensen PR, Williams PG, Oh D-C, Zeigler L, Fenical W. Species-specific secondary metabolite production in marine actinomycetes of the genus Salinispora . Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:1146–1152. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01891-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Thompson J, Gibson T, Plewniak F, Jeanmonguin F, Higgins D. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acid Res. 1997;24:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17:368–376. doi: 10.1007/BF01734359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Chun J, Rainey FA. Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the Bacteria and Archaea . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:316–324. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.054171-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:461–466. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Udwary DW, Zeigler L, Asolkar RN, Singan V, Lapidus A, et al. Genome sequencing reveals complex secondary metabolome in the marine actinomycete Salinispora tropica . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:10376–10381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700962104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gu Z, Eils R, Schlesner M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:2847–2849. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. Sina: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1823–1829. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chase AB, Martiny JBH. The importance of resolving biogeographic patterns of microbial microdiversity. Microbiol Aust. 2018;39:5–8. doi: 10.1071/MA18003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Prepr. 2016;4:e1900v1. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1966;16:313–340. doi: 10.1099/00207713-16-3-313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Carro L, Riesco R, Spröer C, Trujillo ME. Micromonospora ureilytica sp. nov., Micromonospora noduli sp. nov. and Micromonospora vinacea sp. nov., isolated from Pisum sativum nodules. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:3509–3514. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Trujillo ME, Fernández-Molinero C, Velázquez E, Kroppenstedt RM, Schumann P, et al. Micromonospora mirobrigensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:877–880. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63361-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M, et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods. 1984;2:233–241. doi: 10.1016/0167-7012(84)90018-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol. 1974;28:226–231. doi: 10.1128/AEM.28.2.226-231.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chase AB, Arevalo P, Polz MF, Berlemont R, Martiny JBH. Evidence for ecological flexibility in the cosmopolitan genus Curtobacterium . Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Jensen PR, Dwight R, Fenical W. Distribution of actinomycetes in near-shore tropical marine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:1102–1108. doi: 10.1128/AEM.57.4.1102-1108.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Letzel A-C, Li J, Amos GCA, Millán-Aguiñaga N, Ginigini J, et al. Genomic insights into specialized metabolism in the marine actinomycete Salinispora . Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:3660–3673. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES