Skip to main content
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease logoLink to Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
. 2020 May 10;9(10):e016228. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.016228

AUB‐HAS2 Cardiovascular Risk Index: Performance in Surgical Subpopulations and Comparison to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index

Habib A Dakik 1,, Eman Sbaity 2, Ahmad Msheik 1, Chris Kaspar 1, Mahmoud Eldirani 1, Omar Chehab 1, Ossama Abou Hassan 1, Aurelie Mailhac 3, Maha Makki 3, Hani Tamim 3
PMCID: PMC7660845  PMID: 32390481

Abstract

Background

The American University of Beirut (AUB)‐HAS2 Cardiovascular Risk Index is a newly derived index for preoperative cardiovascular evaluation. It is based on 6 data elements: history of heart disease; symptoms of angina or dyspnea; age ≥75 years; hemoglobin <12 mg/dL; vascular surgery; and emergency surgery. In this study we analyze the performance of this new index and compare it with that of the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in a broad spectrum of surgical subpopulations.

Methods and Results

The study population consisted of 1 167 278 noncardiac surgeries registered in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Each patient was given an AUB‐HAS2 score of 0, 1, 2, 3, or >3, depending on the number of data elements present. The performance of the AUB‐HAS2 index was studied in 9 surgical specialty groups and in 8 commonly performed site‐specific surgeries. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed for the AUB‐HAS2 and Revised Cardiac Risk Index measures, and the areas under the curve were compared. The outcome measure was death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 30 days after surgery. The AUB‐HAS2 score was able to stratify risk in all surgical subgroups (P<0.001). In the majority of surgeries, patients with an AUB‐HAS2 score of 0 had an event rate of <0.5%. The performance of the AUB‐HAS2 index was superior to that of the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in all surgical subgroups (P<0.001).

Conclusions

This study extends the validation of the AUB‐HAS2 index to a broad spectrum of surgical subpopulations and demonstrates its superior discriminatory power compared with the commonly utilized Revised Cardiac Risk Index.

Keywords: AUB‐HAS2 cardiovascular risk index, preoperative cardiovascular evaluation, revised cardiac risk index

Subject Categories: Quality and Outcomes


Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

ACS NSQIP

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

AUB

American University of Beirut

AUC

area under the curve

CVRI

cardiovascular risk index

RCRI

revised cardiac risk index

ROC

receiver operating characteristic curve

Clinical Perspective

What Is New?

  • The American University of Beirut (AUB)‐HAS2 Cardiovascular Risk Index is a newly derived index for preoperative cardiovascular evaluation that is based on 6 easily acquired data elements: history of heart disease; symptoms of heart disease (angina or dyspnea); age ≥75 years; anemia (hemoglobin <12 mg/dL); vascular surgery; and emergency surgery.

  • • The AUB‐HAS2 index can stratify patients undergoing noncardiac surgery into 3 risk groups: low risk (score 0–1); intermediate risk (score 2–3); and high risk (score >3).

  • This study extends the validation of this new index to a broad spectrum of surgical specialties and site‐specific surgical procedures, and the performance of the AUB‐HAS2 index was shown to be superior to that of the commonly utilized Revised Cardiac Risk Index in all surgical subgroups.

What Are the Clinical Implications?

  • The AUB‐HAS2 cardiovascular risk index is a simple and comprehensive measure that can be effectively utilized by the busy physician in clinic or the nurse in the preadmission unit to quickly stratify the cardiovascular risk of patients undergoing a wide range of noncardiac surgical procedures.

  • The AUB‐HAS2 index can identify a large group of low‐risk patients with a score of 0 who may not need further cardiovascular evaluation or special monitoring postoperatively.

  • This index facilitates optimal use of human and hospital resources in patients undergoing surgery.

Preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment is an essential step in the initial evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 There are several indices derived for this risk assessment. The Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) is probably the most commonly used measure because of its relative simplicity.5 It consists of 6 variables: high‐risk surgery; history of ischemic heart disease; history of congestive heart failure; history of cerebrovascular disease; Diabetes mellitus on insulin; and creatinine >2 mg/dL (Table 1). However, recent large cohort studies have suggested that the RCRI may underestimate the risk of cardiovascular events in contemporary surgical practice.7

Table 1.

Elements of the AUB‐HAS2 and Revised Cardiac Risk Indices

AUB‐HAS2 Cardiovascular Risk Index Revised Cardiac Risk Index
  • History of heart disease

  • Symptoms of heart disease (angina or dyspnea)

  • Age ≥75 years

  • Anemia (hemoglobin <12 mg/dL)

  • Vascular surgery

  • Emergency surgery

  • History of ischemic heart disease

  • History of congestive heart failure

  • History of cerebrovascular disease

  • Diabetes mellitus on insulin

  • Creatinine >2 mg/dL

  • High‐risk surgery

AUB indicates The American University of Beirut.

We have recently reported a new risk index: the AUB‐HAS2 cardiovascular risk index, which is simple to acquire and has a powerful discriminatory ability to predict cardiovascular events after noncardiac surgery.8 The index was derived from a prospectively enrolled cohort of 3284 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery at the American University of Beirut (AUB) and it was validated in the large American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.8, 9, 10 The AUB‐HAS2 index is based on 6 easily acquired data elements: history of Heart disease; symptoms of Heart disease (angina or dyspnea); Age ≥75 years; Anemia (hemoglobin <12 mg/dL); vascular Surgery; and emergency Surgery (Figure 1). It can stratify patients undergoing noncardiac surgery into 3 risk groups: low risk (score 0–1); intermediate risk (score 2–3); and high risk (score >3). The objective of this study is to analyze the performance of the AUB‐HAS2 index in a broad spectrum of surgical subpopulations and compare it to that of the commonly utilized RCRI.

Figure 1. The AUB‐HAS2 index.

Figure 1

AUB indicates American University of Beirut. The HAS2 is an acronym of the data elements as illustrated in the figure.

Methods

The authors declare that all supporting data are available within the article. According to the guidelines of the AUB institutional review board, review and approval was not needed for our analysis because it involved de‐identified data previously collected as part of a quality assurance program.

The study population consisted of 1 167 278 noncardiac surgical procedures registered between 2008 and 2012 in the ACS NSQIP database.9, 10 Data sets after 2012 were not included in our study because they did not capture patients’ cardiac history, which is one of the essential elements in the AUB‐HAS2 Cardiovascular Risk Index. The ACS NSQIP is a large, multicenter database that collects data on patients undergoing major surgical procedures from >250 participating sites on >150 variables, including preoperative risk factors, intraoperative variables, and 30‐day postoperative mortality and morbidity outcomes. The data are collected by trained surgical clinical reviewers at each site using a systematic sampling process and are subject to regular interrater reliability audits to assess its quality. Required data variables are entered via web‐based data collection to the ACS NSQIP website. Types of surgery are entered in the database using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Patients <18 years of age were excluded from the database as were as minor and transplant surgical procedures.

Each patient was assigned an AUB‐HAS2 score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and >3, based on the number of data elements present. The AUB‐HAS2 elements are: history of heart disease; symptoms of heart disease (angina or dyspnea); age ≥75 years; anemia (hemoglobin <12 mg/dL); vascular surgery; and emergency surgery. Patients were designated as having a history of heart disease if they had a history of previous myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, cardiac surgery, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, or moderate/severe valvular disease confirmed by echocardiography. The primary outcome measure was death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 30 days after surgery.8, 9, 10 Death was defined as mortality secondary to any cause occurring during the intraoperative period or at any point within 30 days after the principal operative procedure. Myocardial infarction was defined by electrocardiographic changes indicative of an acute myocardial infarction (at least 1 of the following factors: ST elevation >1 mm in 2 or more contiguous leads; new left bundle branch; or new Q waves in 2 of more contiguous leads), or new elevation in troponin >3‐fold the upper level of the reference range in the setting of suspected myocardial ischemia. Stroke was defined as the new occurrence of a motor, sensory, or cognitive dysfunction that persists for >24 hours. The performance of the AUB‐HAS2 index was studied in the 9 surgical specialty groups coded in the NSQIP database (general, vascular, orthopedics, gynecology, urology, neurosurgery, ear‐nose‐throat, plastic surgery, and thoracic surgery) and in 8 site‐specific surgeries that are commonly performed in routine clinical practice (cholecystectomy, breast [mastectomy], colon [colectomy], hip, hysterectomy, prostate [prostatectomy], abdominal aortic aneurysm [AAA]–open surgical repair, and spine surgery).

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analysis of the surgical specialty groups and site‐specific surgical procedures was performed and presented in the respective tables. Categorical variables are presented as number and percentage and continuous variables as mean±standard deviation. Comparison of baseline clinical characteristics among the different surgical groups was performed using the Pearson's chi‐square test for categorical variables. The performance of the AUB‐HAS2 index was assessed by comparing the event rates among the different score groups (0, 1, 2, 3, and >3) in each of the surgical subgroups. The Cochran‐Armitage test for trend was used to evaluate the trend in the proportions of the outcome across the levels of the AUB‐HAS2 score. Comparison of areas under the curve (AUCs) of the AUB‐HAS2 Cardiovascular Risk Index and RCRI was performed using the nonparametric Z test.11 SAS version 9.4 was used for data management and analyses. Statistical significance was set at the 0.05 alpha level.

Results

Surgical Specialties

Table 2 shows the baseline clinical characteristics of the patients enrolled in the different surgical specialty groups. The largest groups of patients were those undergoing general, vascular, and orthopedic surgeries (amounting to 85% of the overall population). Vascular, orthopedic, urology, and thoracic patients were older, with a mean age >60 years. Vascular patients had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, previous cardiac disease, and comorbidities (creatinine >1.5 mg/dL, dialysis, and stroke). Vascular and thoracic patients had a higher prevalence of symptoms of angina or dyspnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, advanced American Society of Anesthesiology class (>3), and a longer duration of hospital stay.

Table 2.

Clinical Characteristics of Surgical Specialty Groups

Total(N=1 167 278) Surgical Specialty
General (n=751 927) Vascular (n=136 201) Orthopedics (n=101 529) Gynecology (n=56 096) Urology (n=43 018) Neurosurgery (n=30 186) ENT (n=20 360) Plastics (n=16 077) Thoracic (n=11 884)
Demographics
Age, y 57±17 55±17 67±13 63±15 49±14 65±14 57±15 52±18 51±15 61±15
Male gender 42 40 59 43 0.0 78 51 46 19 54
BMI, kg/m2 30±8.4 31±9.0 28±6.6 31±7.4 30±7.6 29±6.2 29±6.6 29±7.5 29±7.2 28±7.0
CVD risk factors
Diabetes mellitus 16.2 14.7 29.6 15.9 7.9 17.5 14.8 11.6 9.8 15.6
Hypertension 48.7 44.2 76.8 56.0 29.1 56.7 48.0 38.3 31.3 51.8
Current smoker 20.0 18.7 31.8 15.2 17.9 15.8 24.7 21.6 15.9 26.4
Cardiac history
MI 0.6 0.4 2.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.5
CHF 0.9 0.7 2.6 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.5
h/o PCI 5.8 4.2 16.3 6.0 1.1 8.3 5.2 3.5 2.4 8.1
h/o cardiac surgery 5.8 4.0 19.2 4.7 0.9 7.3 4.1 3.1 2.9 7.6
Any h/o heart disease 10.9 7.9 32.2 10.0 1.9 13.9 8.6 6.2 4.8 15.8
Symptoms
Angina or dyspnea 10.4 9.8 18.8 7.7 4.6 7.9 6.8 7.8 4.0 39.4
Comorbidities
Cr >1.5 mg/dL 7.1 5.8 18.5 4.6 1.2 9.6 2.9 3.6 3.0 6.4
Dialysis 2.0 1.4 7.6 0.7 0.1 1.0 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.5
COPD 5.3 4.2 12.8 4.6 1.5 5.5 4.3 4.0 2.1 18.3
Stroke 4.5 3.1 14.7 3.9 1.2 4.2 6.2 2.5 2.1 4.1
Blood tests
Hemoglobin, g/dL 13.0±1.8 13.0±1.8 12.6±2.0 13.2±1.7 12.8±1.4 13.5±1.7 13.4±1.6 13.4±1.5 12.9±1.5 12.9±1.9
Creatinine, mg/dL 1.1±0.9 1.0±0.9 1.5±1.6 0.9±0.6 0.8±0.4 1.1±0.8 0.9±0.5 0.9±0.6 0.9±0.6 1.0±0.8
Surgery characteristics
Anesthesia
General 92.0 95.0 84.7 73.4 95.6 90.0 98.8 98.6 94.0 99.1
Spinal/epidural 3.1 0.6 3.8 21.0 3.2 7.6 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.4
Regional 0.8 0.2 3.0 3.9 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.0
Local 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.1
Other 3.8 3.9 7.8 1.6 1.0 1.8 0.9 1.2 3.2 0.4
ASA class
1 7.8 8.8 2.2 6.2 15.2 4.7 4.2 11.4 12.9 1.3
2 44.1 47.6 12.4 48.5 63.6 46.4 42.6 48.8 56.6 20.9
3 41.0 38.1 63.2 41.3 20.3 44.7 45.7 36.4 27.5 60.0
>3 7.2 5.6 22.2 4.0 0.9 4.2 7.6 3.5 2.9 17.7
Emergency case 13.2 16.8 11.0 5.4 3.5 2.0 6.8 3.9 2.7 4.9
Operation time, minutes 114±94 108±90 140±100 95±68 112±75 118±104 165±114 137±151 151±127 138±104
Hospital stay, days 4.4±9.8 4.6±10.1 6.3±11.5 3.4±7.0 2.0±5.7 2.6±6.8 4.7±9.5 2.4±8.6 2.8±10.0 7.8±12.0

Values are expressed as percent or mean±standard deviation. Comparisons of the clinical characteristics variables between the different surgical specialty groups were all statistically significant with a P<0.001. ASA indicates American Society of Anesthesiology; BMI, body mass index; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Cr, creatinine; CVD, cardiovascular disease; ENT, ear‐nose‐throat; h/o, history of ; MI, myocardial infarction; and PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Table 3 and Figure 2A show the incidence of the primary outcome in each of the specialties and compares the event rates among the different AUB‐HAS2 score groups within each specialty. Fifty percent or more of the patients had a score of 0 in the overall population and within each subspecialty (except for vascular surgery patients who had a minimum score of 1). On the other hand, 1.4% of patients in the overall population had a score >3 and this percentage was low in all of the specialties as well (except for vascular surgery patients in which it was 9.5%). The highest event rate was in the vascular (5.1%) followed by thoracic (4.0%) surgeries. General and neurosurgery procedures had event rates of 2.0% and 2.6%, respectively. The remaining specialties had an event rate of around 1% or less. The event rate in patients with a score of 0 was <0.5% in all specialties except neurosurgery (1.0%) and thoracic (1.5%) surgeries. The event rate in patients with a score >3 was at least 10% in all specialties. Gynecology, ear‐nose‐throat, and plastic surgeries did not have a significant number of patients in this subgroup to make any clinically relevant interpretation (absolute number <10). In all specialties, there was a significant trend to higher event rates at higher AUB‐HAS2 scores (P value for trend <0.001).

Table 3.

Comparison of Outcomes Among the AUB‐HAS2 Score Groups Within Each Surgical Specialty

Total AUB‐HAS2 Score
0 1 2 3 >3
(N=1 167 278) (N=583 161) (N=361 973) (N=149 057) (N=56 622) (N=16 465)
General, n 751 927 407 062 245 432 76 991 19 443 2999
Death, MI, or stroke 14 931 (2.0%) 1346 (0.3%) 4025 (1.6%) 5438 (7.1%) 3265 (17%) 857 (29%)
Death 12 265 (1.6%) 891 (0.2%) 3116 (1.3%) 4584 (6.0%) 2894 (15%) 780 (26%)
MI 2361 (0.3%) 305 (0.1%) 738 (0.3%) 779 (1.0%) 435 (2.2%) 104 (3.5%)
Stroke 1212 (0.2%) 230 (0.1%) 398 (0.2%) 381 (0.5%) 172 (0.9%) 31 (1.0%)
Vascular, n 136 201 0 42 546 48 860 31 859 12 936
Death, MI, or stroke 6881 (5.1%) 0 (0.0%) 614 (1.4%) 1850 (3.8%) 2463 (7.7%) 1954 (15%)
Death 4514 (3.3%) 0 (0.0%) 232 (1.0%) 1024 (2.1%) 1711 (5.4%) 1547 (12%)
MI 1749 (1.3%) 0 (0.0%) 194 (0.5%) 574 (1.2%) 603 (1.9%) 378 (2.9%)
Stroke 1285 (0.9%) 0 (0.0%) 238 (0.6%) 439 (0.9%) 388 (1.2%) 220 (1.7%)
Orthopedics, n 101 529 59 344 27 981 10 883 2988 333
Death, MI, or stroke 1218 (1.2%) 131 (0.2%) 335 (1.2%) 471 (4.3%) 248 (8.3%) 33 (9.9%)
Death 812 (0.8%) 57 (0.1%) 201 (0.7%) 346 (3.2%) 182 (6.1%) 26 (7.8%)
MI 352 (0.4%) 47 (0.1%) 106 (0.4%) 118 (1.1%) 72 (2.4%) 9 (2.7%)
Stroke 152 (0.2%) 31 (0.1%) 54 (0.2%) 45 (0.4%) 20 (0.7%) 2 (0.6%)
Gynecology, n 56 096 39 583 14 332 2060 118 3
Death, MI, or stroke 133 (0.2%) 27 (0.1%) 71 (0.5%) 27 (1.3%) 8 (6.8%) 0 (0.0%)
Death 82 (0.2%) 17 (0.0%) 39 (0.3%) 21 (1.0%) 5 (4.2%) 0 (0.0%)
MI 40 (0.1%) 8 (0.0%) 22 (0.2%) 7 (0.3%) 3 (2.5%) 0 (0.0%)
Stroke 16 (0.0%) 2 (0.0%) 12 (0.1%) 1 (0.1%) 1 (0.9%) 0 (0.0%)
Urology, n 43 018 25 417 11 913 4618 1013 57
Death, MI, or stroke 420 (1.0%) 91 (0.4%) 142 (1.2%) 119 (2.6%) 60 (5.9%) 8 (14%)
Death 244 (0.6%) 36 (0.1%) 84 (0.7%) 74 (1.6%) 44 (4.3%) 6 (11%)
MI 131 (0.3%) 34 (0.1%) 44 (0.4%) 39 (0.8%) 11 (1.1%) 3 (5.3%)
Stroke 70 (0.2%) 25 (0.1%) 22 (0.2%) 15 (0.3%) 8 (0.8%) 0 (0.0%)
Neurosurgery, n 30 186 20 086 7318 2231 485 66
Death, MI, or stroke 775 (2.6%) 195 (1.0%) 280 (3.8%) 198 (8.9%) 82 (17%) 20 (30%)
Death 546 (1.8%) 81 (0.4%) 204 (2.8%) 170 (7.6%) 72 (15%) 19 (29%)
MI 66 (0.2%) 22 (0.1%) 24 (0.3%) 11 (0.5%) 8 (1.7%) 1 (1.5%)
Stroke 234 (0.8%) 111 (1.0%) 78 (1.1%) 35 (1.6%) 10 (2.1%) 0 (0.0%)
ENT, n 20 360 14 500 4569 1127 156 8
Death, MI, or stroke 115 (0.6%) 28 (0.2%) 48 (1.1%) 29 (2.6%) 10 (6.4%) 0 (0.0%)
Death 65 (0.3%) 15 (0.1%) 25 (1.0%) 17 (1.5%) 8 (5.1%) 0 (0.0%)
MI 32 (0.2%) 8 (0.1%) 15 (0.3%) 8 (0.7%) 1 (0.6%) 0 (0.0%)
Stroke 23 (0.1%) 6 (0.0%) 10 (0.2%) 5 (0.4%) 2 (1.3%) 0 (0.0%)
Plastics, n 16 077 11 372 3779 760 160 6
Death, MI, or stroke 82 (0.5%) 6 (0.1%) 28 (0.7%) 32 (4.2%) 16 (10%) 0 (0.0%)
Death 61 (0.4%) 3 (0.0%) 20 (0.5%) 25 (3.3%) 13 (8.1%) 0 (0.0%)
MI 20 (0.1%) 1 (0.0%) 6 (0.2%) 9 (1.2%) 4 (2.5%) 0 (0.0%)
Stroke 9 (0.1%) 2 (0.0%) 6 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Thoracic, n 11 884 5797 4103 1527 400 57
Death, MI, or stroke 479 (4.0%) 85 (1.5%) 184 (4.5%) 134 (8.8%) 68 (17%) 8 (14%)
Death 409 (3.4%) 66 (1.1%) 164 (4.0%) 109 (7.1%) 62 (16%) 8 (14%)
MI 46 (0.4%) 13 (0.2%) 15 (0.4%) 15 (1.0%) 2 (0.5%) 1 (1.8%)
Stroke 43 (0.4%) 11 (0.2%) 12 (0.3%) 15 (1.0%) 5 (1.3%) 0 (0.0%)

Values expressed as number (%). Comparisons of the event rates between the different AUB‐HAS2 score groups within each specialty were all statistically significant with a P<0.001. AUB indicates American University of Beirut; ENT, ear‐nose‐throat; and MI, myocardial infarction.

Figure 2. Bar graph comparing the 30‐day event rates (death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) among the different AUB‐HAS2 score groups within each specialty (A) and each site‐specific surgery (B) (P value for trend <0.001 in all subgroups). AUB indicates American University of Beirut.

Figure 2

Site‐Specific Surgical Procedures

The performance of the AUB‐HAS2 index was further analyzed in 8 commonly performed site‐specific surgeries that were selected from the various specialties. These included cholecystectomy, breast (mastectomy), colon (colectomy), hip surgery, hysterectomy, prostate (prostatectomy), AAA–open surgical repair, and spine surgery. The baseline clinical characteristics of these patients are shown in Table  4. Similar to the data in Table 1, AAA patients were the oldest and had the highest prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, previous cardiac disease, comorbidities, and advanced American Society of Anesthesiology class (>3). AAA repair and colectomy had the longest hospital stay (mean >9 days).

Table 4.

Clinical Characteristics of the Site‐Specific Surgical Groups

Surgical Procedure
Cholecystectomy (n=86 956) Breast (n=73 673) Colon (n=83 368) Hip (n=17 828) Hysterectomy (n=35 766) Prostate (n=16 851) AAA (n=5202) Spine (n=28 036)
Demographics
Age, y 51±18 58±14 63±16 67±13 49±12 67±10 71±9 57±15
Male gender 31 0.0 47 43 0.0 100 74 51
BMI, kg/m2 31±7.8 29±7.4 28±6.9 29±6.7 30±7.8 29±5.1 28±5.9 30±6.6
CVD risk factors
Diabetes mellitus 12.6 11.5 15.5 12.4 7.9 15.5 12.7 15.5
Hypertension 38.0 42.4 52.5 59.0 29.1 56.9 79.8 50.2
Current smoker 19.4 13.9 18.6 13.4 18.7 11.7 43.0 25.1
Cardiac history
MI 0.3 0.1 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.2 0.1
CHF 0.6 0.2 1.6 0.6 0.1 0.4 1.1 0.2
h/o PCI 3.9 2.1 6.0 6.1 0.8 8.3 16.7 5.6
h/o cardiac surgery 4.2 1.6 5.8 5.3 0.7 7.8 18.8 4.0
Any h/o heart disease 7.4 3.5 11.7 10.7 1.5 14.3 32.4 8.6
Symptoms
Angina or dyspnea 6.9 6.7 12.1 7.9 4.6 6.6 21.9 7.0
Comorbidities
Cr >1.5 mg/dL 3.8 2.1 8.1 4.5 1.0 7.3 16.3 2.7
Dialysis 0.8 0.3 1.5 0.4 0.1 0.4 1.2 0.3
COPD 3.2 2.6 6.9 5.2 1.3 4.6 19.5 4.1
Stroke 2.7 2.4 4.8 4.3 1.1 3.9 9.5 2.6
Blood tests
Hemoglobin, g/dL 12.9±1.6 13.0±1.3 12.5±2.0 13.2±1.6 12.8±1.4 13.9±1.5 13.0±2.0 13.6±1.5
Creatinine, mg/dL 0.9±0.7 0.8±0.5 1.0±0.8 1.0±0.6 0.8±0.4 1.1±0.6 1.2±0.8 0.9±0.5
Surgery characteristics
Anesthesia
General 99.9 83.8 99.7 61.0 97.1 86.4 99.2 99.1
Spinal/epidural 0.1 0.1 0.2 33.8 2.6 12.3 0.6 0.8
Regional 0.0 0.4 0.0 4.5 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.0
Local 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other 0.0 14.6 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.1
ASA class
1 11.3 9.0 2.8 3.8 13.8 3.7 0.2 5.3
2 57.3 60.8 42.8 47.7 65.4 53.1 4.9 51.9
3 28.5 29.0 43.7 44.3 20.0 40.4 54.7 40.0
>3 2.8 1.2 10.7 4.2 0.8 2.7 40.2 2.8
Emergency case 11.4 0.3 18.0 3.3 0.7 0.8 21.5 2.2
Operation time, minutes 76±47 106±99 160±85 101±53 127±72 131±92 235±104 153±100
Hospital stay, days 2.6±6.3 0.9±4.8 9.7±11.9 4.2±6.2 2.2±5.8 1.9±5.1 10.4±12.2 3.4±6.7

Values are expressed as percent or as mean±standard deviation. Comparisons of the clinical characteristic variables between the different surgical procedures were all statistically significant with a P<0.001. AAA indicates abdominal aortic aneurysm; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiology; BMI, body mass index; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Cr, creatinine; CVD, cardiovascular disease; h/o, history of; MI, myocardial infarction; and PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Table 5 and Figure 2B show the incidence of the primary outcome and compares the event rates among the different AUB‐HAS2 score groups within each type of surgery. Again, here, more than half of the patients had a score of 0 in all types of surgical procedures, except for colectomy (41%) and AAA (who have a minimum score of 1). The highest event rate was in AAA (13.1%), followed by colectomy (5.2%) and hip (1.5%) surgeries. The remainder of procedures had an event rate at <1%. The event rate in patients with a score of 0 was <0.5% in all procedures except for colectomy (0.8%). There was a significant trend to higher event rates at higher AUB‐HAS2 scores in all types of surgery (P value for trend <0.001).

Table 5.

Comparison of Outcomes Among the AUB‐HAS2 Score Groups Within Each of the Site‐Specific Surgeries

Total AUB‐HAS2 Score
0 1 2 3 >3
Cholecystectomy, n 86 956 50 636 26 414 7739 1901 266
Death, MI, or stroke 637 (0.7%) 61 (0.1%) 191 (0.7%) 241 (3.1%) 117 (6.2%) 27 (10.2%)
Death 465 (0.5%) 42 (0.1%) 134 (0.5%) 183 (2.4%) 82 (4.3%) 24 (9.0%)
MI 148 (0.2%) 14 (0.0%) 46 (0.2%) 56 (0.7%) 28 (1.5%) 4 (1.5%)
Stroke 72 (0.1%) 9 (0.0%) 22 (0.1%) 24 (0.3%) 16 (0.8%) 1 (0.4%)
Breast, n 73 673 50 823 19 406 3117 313 14
Death, MI, or stroke 120 (0.2%) 17 (0.0%) 67 (0.4%) 27 (0.9%) 8 (2.6%) 1 (7.1%)
Death 66 (0.1%) 4 (0.0%) 44 (0.2%) 14 (0.5%) 3 (1.0%) 1 (7.1%)
MI 30 (0.0%) 5 (0.0%) 14 (0.1%) 6 (0.2%) 5 (1.6%) 0 (0.0%)
Stroke 35 (0.1%) 9 (0.0%) 16 (0.1%) 9 (0.3%) 1 (0.3%) 0 (0.0%)
Colon, n 83 368 34 517 27 423 15 080 5409 939
Death, MI, or stroke 4306 (5.2%) 265 (0.8%) 926 (3.4%) 1641 (10.9%) 1160 (21.5%) 314 (33.4%)
Death 3528 (4.2%) 163 (0.5%) 709 (2.6%) 1344 (8.9%) 1031 (19.1%) 281 (29.9%)
MI 697 (0.8%) 68 (0.2%) 182 (0.7%) 249 (1.7%) 159 (2.9%) 39 (4.2%)
Stroke 389 (0.5%) 49 (0.1%) 95 (0.4%) 160 (1.1%) 71 (1.3%) 14 (1.5%)
Hip, n 17 828 9776 5311 2129 557 55
Death, MI, or stroke 268 (1.5%) 31 (0.3%) 82 (1.5%) 99 (4.7%) 50 (9.0%) 6 (10.9%)
Death 163 (0.9%) 10 (0.1%) 41 (0.8%) 70 (3.3%) 38 (6.8%) 4 (7.3%)
MI 80 (0.5%) 11 (0.1%) 30 (0.6%) 24 (1.1%) 12 (2.2%) 3 (5.5%)
Stroke 46 (0.3%) 12 (0.1%) 19 (0.4%) 10 (0.5%) 5 (0.9%) 0 (0.0%)
Hysterectomy, n 35 766 25 971 9099 648 47 1
Death, MI, or stroke 67 (0.2%) 16 (0.1%) 35 (0.4%) 14 (2.2%) 2 (4.3%) 0 (0.0%)
Death 39 (0.1%) 10 (0.0%) 16 (0.2%) 13 (2.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
MI 21 (0.1%) 4 (0.0%) 12 (0.1%) 4 (0.6%) 1 (2.1%) 0 (0.0%)
Stroke 11 (0.0%) 2 (0.0%) 8 (0.1%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (2.1%) 0 (0.0%)
Prostate, n 16 851 11 089 3862 1541 342 17
Death, MI, or stroke 95 (0.6%) 23 (0.2%) 34 (0.9%) 23 (1.5%) 14 (4.1%) 1 (5.9%)
Death 44 (0.3%) 7 (0.1%) 13 (0.3%) 14 (0.9%) 9 (2.6%) 1 (5.9%)
MI 31 (0.2%) 8 (0.1%) 14 (0.4%) 6 (0.4%) 3 (0.9%) 0 (0.0%)
Stroke 24 (0.1%) 9 (0.1%) 8 (0.2%) 5 (0.3%) 2 (0.6%) 0 (0.0%)
AAA, n 5202 0 1496 1900 1187 619
Death, MI, or stroke 683 (13.1%) 0 (0.0%) 46 (3.1%) 160 (8.4%) 243 (20.5%) 234 (37.8%)
Death 533 (10.3%) 0 (0.0%) 19 (1.3%) 103 (5.4%) 198 (16.7%) 213 (34.4%)
MI 150 (2.9%) 0 (0.0%) 22 (1.5%) 53 (2.8%) 44 (3.7%) 31 (5.0%)
Stroke 55 (1.1%) 0 (0.0%) 8 (0.5%) 19 (1.0%) 19 (1.6%) 9 (1.5%)
Spine, n 28 036 19 919 6289 1578 241 9
Death, MI, or stroke 199 (0.7%) 60 (0.3%) 76 (1.2%) 45 (2.9%) 18 (7.5%) 0 (0.0%)
Death 114 (0.4%) 23 (0.1%) 45 (0.7%) 31 (2.0%) 15 (6.2%) 0 (0.0%)
MI 61 (0.2%) 23 (0.1%) 24 (0.4%) 10 (0.6%) 4 (1.7%) 0 (0.0%)
Stroke 38 (0.1%) 19 (0.1%) 12 (0.2%) 6 (0.4%) 1 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%)

Values are expressed as number (%). Comparisons of the event rates between the different AUB‐HAS2 groups within each type of surgery were all statistically significant with a P<0.001. AAA indicates abdominal aortic aneurysm; AUB, American University of Beirut; and MI, myocardial infarction.

Comparison of AUB‐HAS2 and RCRI Performance

Comparison of the AUB‐HAS2 index performance with that of the RCRI was done by constructing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the 2 indices and comparing the areas under the curve (AUCs) in the overall study population and in each of the surgical subgroups. The performance of the AUB‐HAS2 index was superior to that of the RCRI in the overall study population (AUCs of 0.818 vs 0.716, P<0.001) (Figure 3). ROC curves were also constructed and AUCs measured for the 2 indices in the various specialties and site‐specific surgeries (Table 6). The AUCs for the AUB‐HAS2 index in the surgical specialties ranged from 0.71 in vascular and thoracic surgery to >0.80 in orthopedic, general, and plastic surgery. In the site‐specific surgical procedures, AUCs of the AUB‐HAS2 index ranged from 0.73 in spine surgery to 0.83 in cholecystectomy. The AUCs of the AUB‐HAS2 index were higher than those of the RCRI in all of the surgical specialties and site‐specific procedures (P<0.001).

Figure 3. Comparison of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the AUB‐HAS2 index and the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) in the overall study population.

Figure 3

AUB indicates American University of Beirut; AUC, area under the curve (P<0.001 for AUB‐HAS2 vs RCRI).

Table 6.

Comparison of AUCs for RCRI and AUB‐HAS2 Index Among the Different Specialties and Site‐Specific Surgical Groups

RCRI AUB‐HAS2
Surgical specialty
General surgery 0.743 (0.739–0.746) 0.828 (0.825–0.831)
Vascular 0.659 (0.652–0.665) 0.709 (0.703–0.715)
Orthopedics 0.648 (0.633–0.662) 0.814 (0.803–0.826)
Gynecology 0.638 (0.594–0.681) 0.776 (0.738–0.814)
Urology 0.634 (0.608–0.661) 0.734 (0.710–0.758)
Neurosurgery 0.664 (0.643–0.684) 0.746 (0.729–0.764)
ENT 0.626 (0.573–0.678) 0.762 (0.718–0.806)
Plastics 0.792 (0.724–0.859) 0.881 (0.845–0.916)
Thoracic 0.589 (0.565–0.614) 0.712 (0.690–0.735)
Site‐specific surgery
Cholecystectomy 0.690 (0.670–0.710) 0.826 (0.810–0.842)
Breast 0.637 (0.594–0.680) 0.802 (0.767–0.838)
Colon 0.673 (0.665–0.681) 0.800 (0.794–0.807)
Hip 0.636 (0.607–0.666) 0.790 (0.764–0.815)
Hysterectomy 0.645 (0.588–0.702) 0.770 (0.713–0.826)
Prostate 0.583 (0.538–0.629) 0.740 (0.690–0.789)
AAA 0.571 (0.552–0.589) 0.747 (0.729–0.766)
Spine 0.580 (0.549–0.612) 0.731 (0.695–0.766)

Data are expressed as area under the curve (95% CI). P<0.001 for AUB‐HAS2 vs RCRI in all surgical subgroups. AAA indicates abdominal aortic aneurysm; AUB, American University of Beirut; AUC, area under the curve; ENT, ear‐nose‐throat; NSQIP, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Index; and RCRI, Revised Cardiac Risk Index.

Discussion

The AUB‐HAS2 Cardiovascular Risk Index is a newly derived measure that can quickly stratify the risk of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery.8 It was validated in a large population of >1 million patients registered in the ACS NSQIP database. Different types of surgery carry different risks depending on their location, hemodynamic stress, duration, and other factors.12, 13, 14 It is therefore important to study the performance of a new preoperative risk index in different surgical subpopulations as part of its ongoing validation. In this study, the performance of the AUB‐HAS2 index was analyzed and compared with that of the RCRI in a wide spectrum of surgical specialties and site‐specific surgeries. Several important observations are noted.

The RCRI (reported in 1999) was derived and validated in a study of 4315 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery in 1 tertiary‐care teaching hospital.5 Its primary outcome measure was a combination of myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, ventricular fibrillation, primary cardiac arrest, and complete heart block. Recent large‐cohort studies have suggested that the RCRI may underestimate the risk of cardiovascular events in contemporary surgical practice.7 Our findings show that the AUB‐HAS2 index has a superior discriminatory power compared with the RCRI in the overall study population and in all surgical subgroups as well. There are several factors that may explain this superiority. The AUB‐HAS2 index is more comprehensive in both its data elements as well as in its outcome measure. Two of the primary data elements in the RCRI (history of ischemic heart disease and history of congestive heart failure) are included in the history of heart disease element in the AUB‐HAS2 index. The AUB‐HAS2 index includes an additional element related to the symptoms of active heart disease (angina or dyspnea on exertion). It is very well known that the presence of symptoms significantly increases the risk profile of patients across the spectrum of ischemic, heart failure, and valvular diseases. The AUB‐HAS2 index also includes 2 additional elements of age ≥75 years and anemia. The RCRI included all adult patients ≥50 years old, but did not stratify them by age any further. The cardiac risk increases across the age strata and a 75‐year‐old patient is expected to have a higher risk profile than someone 55 years old. Anemia has been recently shown to be a major predictor of postoperative events in multiple studies.1, 2, 3 The AUB‐HAS2 index had a wider representation of patient groups in its derivation cohort, enrolling both low‐risk and emergency surgery patients who were not enrolled in the RCRI cohort. Finally, the outcome measures in the AUB‐HAS2 index are more comprehensive and include both death and stroke, which were not included in the RCRI. Thus, the AUB‐HAS2 index is more comprehensive in its data elements, derivation population, and outcome measures.

This study reconfirms the very low risk of patients with an AUB‐HAS2 score of 0 in a broad range of surgical procedures. In most, the 30‐day risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was <1.0% and in many it was <0.5%. The only exception was thoracic surgery, where the risk was 1.5%. This has major implications because the group of patients with an AUB‐HAS2 score of 0 constitutes more than half of the patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. The availablity of a simple index that the physician can acquire in the clinic or a nurse can measure in the preadmission unit can facilitate the quick triage of this large population of patients who, in the large majority of cases, would probably not require any further cardiac evaluation/testing or special monitoring postoperatively. On the other hand, the AUB‐HAS2 index was also able to identify a small but high‐risk group of patients (score >3) with a postoperative event rate of >10% in most procedures and reaching >30% in AAA and colon surgeries. This small patient group would therefore require more extensive cardiovascular evaluation and optimization before surgery and would probably need closer postoperative monitoring. These clinical care strategies based on the AUB‐HAS2 score constitute major targets for prospective validation in future studies.

Our findings also reconfirm the ability of the AUB‐HAS2 index to stratify risk in different surgical subpopulations. The 30‐day event rates increased gradually with the AUB‐HAS2 score in all subgroups, with some variation in the AUCs between them. The performance of the index, in terms of the ROC analysis, was best in general and orthopedic surgeries, which constituted 73% of the overall population. In those specialties, the AUC was 0.83 and 0.81, respectively. Similarly, the AUC in the respective site‐specific surgeries in these specialties (cholecystectomy, mastectomy, colectomy, and hip) ranged from 0.79 to 0.83. The AUC was lower in vascular surgeries such as AAA (0.75), but still there was a steady increase in risk, with an increase in score (from 3.1% in those with a score of 1 up to 37.8% in those with a score >3). Furthermore, even in traditionally “low‐risk surgeries,” such as mastectomy, the AUB‐HAS2 index was able to further stratify risk into different levels from 0% in those with a score of 0 up to 7.1% in those with a score of >3.

The original study describing the derivation and validation of the AUB‐HAS2 Cardiovascular Risk Index recommended use of low‐, intermediate‐, and high‐risk categories, depending on the score (low risk for score of 0–1, intermediate risk for score of 2–3, and high risk for score >3).8 Conventionally, low‐risk surgeries are those with a risk of <1%, with a >10% risk considered high, and intermediate risk anything in between. For the majority of the specialties and site‐specific surgeries, there was a correlation between the AUB‐HAS2 risk categories and these percent definitions. However, in a few specific situations, there was some overlap in these categories. In both AAA repair and colectomy, there was an upward shift of risk in all AUB‐HAS2 risk groups. In both types of surgery, a score of 1 had a low/intermediate risk of around 3% and a score of 3 had a high risk of around 20%. This is probably due to the fact that the overall risk of these 2 surgeries is relatively high (13.1% and 5.2%, respectively) similar to what has been reported in the literature.15, 16, 17 This should be taken into consideration in the evaluation of patients undergoing these types of surgery.

Limitations

In this study we have described the performance of the newly derived AUB‐HAS2 Cardiovascular Risk Index and compared it to that of the commonly utilized RCRI in a wide spectrum of surgical specialties and site‐specific surgeries. Although our study population is derived from a large multicenter database, it still primarily represents North America. The findings will need to be further validated in other patient populations in different countries with a wider geographic representation. Furthermore, because the ACS NSQIP database consisted of surgeries rather than patients, it is possible that the same patient may have been included more than once in the study population, which may have impacted variability. Because data in the NSQIP database are de‐identified, it would not be possible to verify whether the same patient was included more than once for another surgery. However, because the database is multicenter (with >250 participating sites), with only a sample of patients included from each site, the expected percentage of patients with multiple entries would be very small and thus would have no significant impact on the overall findings.

Conclusions

This study extends the validation of the newly derived AUB‐HAS2 Cardiovascular Risk Index to a broad range of surgical specialties and site‐specific surgeries. The AUB‐HAS2 index performed better than the commonly used RCRI in all surgery groups. Moreover, for all surgical subpopulations, the AUB‐HAS2 index was able to identify a large group of low‐risk patients (score = 0) who, in general, may not require any special preoperative cardiovascular evaluation or postoperative monitoring.

Sources of Funding

None.

Disclosures

None.

(J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e016228 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.016228.)

For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 11.

References

  • 1. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, Davila‐Roman VG, Gerhard‐Herman MD, Holly TA, Kane GC, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing non cardiac surgery. A report of the American college of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:2215–2245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, Anker S, Bøtker HE, Hert SD, Ford I, Gonzalez‐Juanatey JR, Gorenek B, Heyndrickx GR, et al. 2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on non‐cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: the Joint Task Force on non‐cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anesthesiology (ESA). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2383–2431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Devereaux PJ, Sessler DI. Cardiac complications in patients undergoing major non‐cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2258–2269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Dakik HA, Kobrossi S, Tamim H. The yield of routine pre‐operative cardiovascular evaluation in stable patients scheduled for elective non‐cardiac surgery. Int J Cardiol. 2015;186:325–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, Sugarbaker DJ, Donaldson MC, Poss R, Ho KK, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major non‐cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gupta PK, Gupta H, Sundaram A, Kaushik M, Fang X, Miller WJ, Esterbrooks DJ, Hunter CB, Pipinos II, Johanning JM, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Circulation. 2011;124:381–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Davis C, Tait G, Carroll J, Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS. The revised cardiac risk index in the new millennium: a single center prospective cohort re‐evaluation of the original variables in 9,519 consecutive elective surgical patients. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:855–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Dakik HA, Chehab O, Eldirani M, Sbeity E, Karam C, Abou Hassan O, Msheik M, Hassan H, Msheik A, Kaspar C, et al. A new index for pre‐operative cardiovascular evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:3067–3078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. User guide for the 2016 ACS NSQIP procedure targeted participant use data file (PUF). December 2017:1–83. Available at: https://www.facs.org/~/media/​files/​quali​ty%20pro​grams/​nsqip/​pt_nsqip_puf_user_guide_2015.ashx. Accessed March 20, 2019.
  • 10. Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Hall BL. Development of an American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:1009–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke‐Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–845. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Sanaiha Y, Juo YY, Aguayo E, Seo YY, Dobaria V, Ziaeian B, Benharash P. Incidence and trends of cardiac complications in major abdominal surgery. Surgery. 2018;164:539–545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Semel ME, Lipsitz S, Funk LM, Bader AM, Weiser TG, Gawande AA. Rates and patterns of death after surgery in the United States, 1996 and 2006. Surgery. 2012;151:171–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Smilowitz N, Gupta N, Ramakrishna H, Guo Y, Berger JS, Bangalore S. Perioperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events associated with noncardiac surgery. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:181–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG, Epstein D, Sculpher MJ; for the United Kingdom Trial Investigators . Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1863–1871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Gualandro DM, Puelacher C, LuratiBuse G, Llobet GB, Yu PC, Cardozo FA, Glarner N, Zimmerli A, Espinola J, Corbière S, et al. Prediction of major cardiac events after vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:1826–1835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Oprian CA, Vernava AM, Wade TP, Phelan MA, Henderson WG, Daley J, Khuri SF. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:83–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES