Skip to main content
Veterinary Record Open logoLink to Veterinary Record Open
. 2020 Nov 12;7(1):e000437. doi: 10.1136/vetreco-2020-000437

Detection of Chlamydiaceae in Swiss wild birds sampled at a bird rehabilitation centre

Sandro Stalder 1,, Hanna Marti 2, Nicole Borel 2, Prisca Mattmann 3, Barbara Vogler 1, Nina Wolfrum 1, Sarah Albini 1
PMCID: PMC7662422  PMID: 33224510

Abstract

Background

Annually, 800–1500 wild birds are admitted to the rehabilitation centre of the Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Lucerne, Switzerland. The workers of the centre come in close contact with the avian patients and might therefore be exposed to zoonotic agents shed by these birds, such as Chlamydia psittaci.

Methods

In the present study, 91 choanal, 91 cloacal and 267 faecal swabs from 339 wild birds of 42 species were investigated using a stepwise diagnostic approach.

Results

Chlamydiaceae were detected in 0.9 per cent (0.3–2.6 per cent) of birds (n=3), all of them members of the Columbidae family. The Chlamydiaceae species of two of these birds (one Eurasian collared dove, one fancy pigeon) were identified as C psittaci types B and E by PCR and outer membrane protein A genotyping.

Conclusion

The findings of the current study suggest that zoonotic transmission of Chlamydiaceae is very unlikely for songbird and waterfowl species tested herein, while pigeons might pose a risk to workers at rehabilitation centres.

Keywords: Chlamydia psittaci, Switzerland, wild birds, bird rehabilitation centre, Chlamydiaceae

Introduction

The rehabilitation centre of the Swiss Ornithological Institute is located in Sempach, Lucerne, Switzerland. In the last 10 years, between 800 and 1500 birds were admitted for treatment annually. The workers of the rehabilitation centre come in close contact with the birds and their faeces during the time of treatment. Thus, the workers might be exposed to zoonotic agents shed by these birds, such as Chlamydia psittaci. Several Chlamydiaceae species are harboured by wild birds, for example, C abortus, C avium, C pecorum and Candidatus C ibidis.1–7 C psittaci, the causative agent of psittacosis/ornithosis in human and avian chlamydiosis, has been detected in more than 460 avian species.8 The clinical signs in C psittaci-infected birds are variable, depending on age, species and immune status of the host, and the pathogenicity of the causative strain.9 Clinical signs include respiratory, enteric and ocular signs, but asymptomatic infections are common.10 In Switzerland, 46 cases in birds have been reported to the Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office from 2010 to 2019.11 Transmission from birds to humans occurs through inhalation of feather dust or aerosols from urine, dried faeces, and respiratory and eye secretions.12 Most infected humans remain asymptomatic or have mild symptoms, but in some cases C psittaci causes severe pneumonia.

Studies investigating the occurrence of Chlamydiaceae in European wild birds reported infection rates ranging from 2.8 per cent to 14.8 per cent determined using PCR or immunoassay.5 13–18 In Switzerland, two PCR-based studies focusing on pigeons reported infection rates of 8.4 per cent and 16.9 per cent,19 20 and another PCR-based study reported infection rates of 14.3 per cent in pigeons, 0.4 per cent in songbirds and 4.3 per cent in waterfowl.21 The highest infection rates of Chlamydiaceae were observed in Columbiformes and Psittaciformes, where C psittaci is the most frequently detected species.22 23 Passeriformes were only occasionally diagnosed with chlamydiosis.24 25

The current study aims to investigate whether admitted wild birds pose a risk of zoonotic chlamydial infection to workers at a Swiss wild bird rehabilitation centre.

Materials and methods

Samples

Samples were obtained from the wild bird rehabilitation centre of the Swiss Ornithological Institute in Sempach, Lucerne, Switzerland, between April and October 2018 (online supplemental table 1). Around two-thirds of the birds were admitted during the peak season from May to mid-July, the majority of which were juveniles. Submitted avian patients received care depending on their condition, for example, feeding, cleaning, veterinary care, treatment or surgery if necessary. The staff of the rehabilitation centre (six persons, among one veterinarian) come into close contact with the birds while handling them, although manual handling is reduced to the necessary minimum. Juvenile birds are kept in small boxes with household paper or foam pads as substrate. Fledged birds are transferred to cages with foam pads or an outdoor aviary. The boxes and foam pads are cleaned every one to two hours using an industrial dishwasher; cages are cleaned with water and soap—depending on the amount and quality of faeces—daily or twice daily. Disinfection of the cages (Meliseptol rapid, B Braun) is carried out before each reassignment. The outdoor aviaries are cleaned when necessary using a high-pressure cleaner at 60°C while wearing a protective mask and goggles.

Supplementary data

vetreco-2020-000437supp001.pdf (165KB, pdf)

This study included 339 wild birds representing nine orders and 42 species, as shown in table 1.

Table 1.

Species, number of sample types and number of individual birds per total number of birds tested for Chlamydiaceae using real-time PCR in this study

Order Family Species name (Latin) Species name (English) Number of available and Chlamydiaceae*-positive swab samples per anatomical site Chlamydiaceae-positive birds (%, 95% CI) Mean Ct value, Chlamydiaceae quantitative PCR Chlamydia psittaci-positive birds (%) Accession number of ompA study sequence
Faeces Choana Cloaca
Anseriformes Anatidae Anas platyrhynchos Mallard 0/26 0/4 0/4 0/29 (0, 0–11.7) n.d.
Cygnus olor Mute swan 0/0 0/1 0/1 0/1 (0, 0–79.4) n.d.
Mergus merganser Common merganser 0/9 0/0 0/0 0/9 (0, 0–29.9) n.d.
Apodiformes Apodidae Apus apus Common swift 0/15 0/7 0/7 0/20 (0, 0–16.1) n.d.
Tachymarptis melba Alpine swift 0/3 0/0 0/0 0/3 (0, 0–56.2) n.d.
Charadriiformes Laridae Larus michahellis Yellow-legged gull 0/3 0/1 0/1 0/4 (0, 0–49.0) n.d.
Ciconiiformes Ciconiidae Ciconia ciconia White stork 0/3 0/2 0/2 0/5 (0, 0–43.5) n.d.
Columbiformes Columbidae Columba livia domestica Fancy pigeon 0/4 1/1 1/1 1/5 (20, 3.6–62.5) Choana: 28.0
Cloaca: 29.3
1/1 (100) MT450277
Columba livia domestica Feral pigeon 0/5 0/2 0/2 0/6 (0, 0–39.0) n.d.
Columba palumbus Common wood pigeon 1/4 0/1 0/1 1/5 (20, 3.6–62.5) Faeces: 37.9 0/1 (0)
Streptopelia decaocto Eurasian collared dove 0/2 1/2 1/2 1/4 (25, 4.6–69.9) Choana: 36.0
Cloaca: 16.9
1/1 (100) MT450278
Gruiformes Rallidae Crex crex Corn crake 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/1 (0, 0–79.4) n.d.
Fulica atra Eurasian coot 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/3 (0, 0–56.2) n.d.
Passeriformes Acrocephalidae Acrocephalus scirpaceus Eurasian reed warbler 0/0 0/1 0/1 0/1 (0, 0–79.4) n.d.
Emberizidae Emberiza citrinella Yellowhammer 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1 (0, 0–79.4) n.d.
Fringillidae Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch 0/8 0/1 0/1 0/8 (0, 0–32.4) n.d.
Chloris chloris European greenfinch 0/4 0/4 0/4 0/7 (0, 0–35.4) n.d.
Coccothraustes coccothraustes Hawfinch 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/2 (0, 0–65.8) n.d.
Fringilla coelebs Common chaffinch 0/4 0/1 0/1 0/4 (0, 0–49.0) n.d.
Serinus serinus European serin 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/1 (0, 0–79.4) n.d.
Hirundinidae Delichon urbicum Common house martin 0/2 0/0 0/0 0/2 (0, 0–65.8) n.d.
Hirundo rustica Barn swallow 0/4 0/2 0/2 0/6 (0, 0–39.0) n.d.
Motacillidae Motacilla alba White wagtail 0/3 0/0 0/0 0/3 (0, 0–56.2) n.d.
Muscicapidae Erithacus rubecula European robin 0/0 0/1 0/1 0/1 (0, 0–79.4) n.d.
Ficedula hypoleuca European pied flycatcher 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/1 (0, 0–79.4) n.d.
Muscicapa striata Spotted flycatcher 0/3 0/0 0/0 0/3 (0, 0–56.2) n.d.
Phoenicurus ochruros Black redstart 0/6 0/2 0/2 0/8 (0, 0–32.4) n.d.
Paridae Cyanistes caeruleus Eurasian blue tit 0/18 0/7 0/7 0/25 (0, 0–13.3) n.d.
Parus major Great tit 0/15 0/3 0/3 0/18 (0, 0–17.6) n.d.
Passeridae Passer domesticus House sparrow 0/40 0/11 0/11 0/48 (0, 0–7.4) n.d.
Passer montanus Eurasian tree sparrow 0/5 0/1 0/1 0/6 (0, 0–39.0) n.d.
Sittidae Sitta europaea Eurasian nuthatch 0/0 0/1 0/1 0/1 (0, 0–79.4) n.d.
Sturnidae Sturnus vulgaris Common starling 0/4 0/2 0/2 0/6 (0, 0–39.0) n.d.
Sylviidae Sylvia atricapilla Eurasian blackcap 0/7 0/1 0/1 0/7 (0, 0–35.4) n.d.
Sylvia borin Garden warbler 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/1 (0, 0–79.4) n.d.
Turdidae Turdus merula Blackbird 0/50 0/22 0/21 0/67 (0, 0–5.4) n.d.
Turdus philomelos Song thrush 0/3 0/3 0/3 0/4 (0, 0–49.0) n.d.
Turdus pilaris Fieldfare 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/3 (0, 0–56.2) n.d.
Turdus viscivorus Mistle thrush 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/1 (0, 0–79.4) n.d.
Pelecaniformes Ardeidae Ardea cinerea Grey heron 0/0 0/2 0/2 0/2 (0, 0–65.8) n.d.
Piciformes Picidae Dendrocopos major Great spotted woodpecker 0/3 0/1 0/1 0/3 (0, 0–56.2) n.d.
Picus viridis European green woodpecker 0/3 0/0 0/1 0/4 (0, 0–49.0) n.d.
Total 1/267 2/91 2/91 3/339 (0.9, 0.3–2.6) 2/3 (66.7)

*All faecal swabs were obtained from living birds after defecation. Both choanal and cloacal swabs were available from 89 deceased birds. From one blackbird only a choanal swab was available. From one Eurasian blue tit a faecal and a choanal swab were available. Only a cloacal swab was obtained from one Eurasian blue tit and one European green woodpecker. All three swab types were obtained from 20 birds that died or were euthanased during treatment due to trauma or disease.

CI, confidence interval; Ct, cycle threshold; n.d., not determined; ompA, outer membrane protein A.

The age of 316 birds was known, of which 163 were nestlings, 126 juveniles and 27 adults. Dry choanal (n=91) and cloacal swabs (n=91) (FLOQSwabs, COPAN Flock Technologies) were obtained from deceased birds only. Dry faecal swabs (n=267) were taken from living birds after defecation. Samples were stored at −80°C until further processing.

DNA extraction

A commercial kit (Genomic DNA from tissue, NucleoSpin Tissue from Macherey-Nagel) was used to extract the DNA of choanal and cloacal swabs. DNA of the faecal samples was extracted with the Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin stool kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was stored at −20°C until further use.

Real-time qPCR assays for detection of Chlamydiaceae

First, all samples were tested in duplicates with a 23S rRNA-based Chlamydiaceae family-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) (111 bp) modified to include an internal positive amplification control (IPC; enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP))26–28 on an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The cycle conditions were 95°C for 20 seconds, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for three seconds and 60°C for 30 seconds. For every sample, a 25 µl reaction mix was prepared, including 12.5 µl TaqMan Universal PCR MasterMix, 500 nM of the primers ‘CH23S-F’ (5’-CTGAAACCAGTAGCTTATAAGCGGT-3’) and ‘CH23S-R’ (5’-ACCTCGCCGTTTAACTTAACTCC-3’), 200 nM of the probe ‘CH23S-P’ (5’ FAM-CTCATCATGCAAAAGGCACGCCG-TAMRA 3’), and 200 nM each of the primers ‘eGFP-1-F’ (5’-GACCACTACCAGCAGAACAC-3’) and ‘eGFP-10-R’ (5’-CTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGC-3’), and the probe ‘eGFP-HEX’ (5’-HEX-AGCACCCAGTCCGCCCTGAGCA-BHQ1-3’). A sevenfold dilution series of C abortus DNA with a known number of DNA copies was included in each run as a positive control and standard curve. Molecular grade water was included as a negative control in each run. Samples were interpreted as positive if the mean cycle threshold (Ct value) was less than 38. Samples with higher Ct values or inhibited amplification were retested in duplicate. Samples repeatedly showing a Ct value greater than 38 were considered positive. Samples with inhibited amplification were retested undiluted and tenfold diluted, both in duplicates.

Secondly, in samples positive for Chlamydiaceae, a C psittaci-specific qPCR (76 bp) was performed as previously described, modified to include an IPC.29 30 The reaction mix contained 4 µl (<150 ng/µl) sample template, 1 µl eGFP template, 1 x TaqMan Universal PCR MasterMix, 900 nM of the primers ‘CppsOMP1-F’ (5’-CACTATGTGGGAAGGTGCTTCA-3’) and ‘CppsOMP1-R’ (5’-CTGCGCGGATGCTAATGG-3’), 200 nM probe ‘CppsOMP1-S’ (5’-FAM-CGCTACTTGGTGTGAC-TAMRA-3’), 900 nM of the primers ‘eGFP-1-F’ (5’-GACCACTACCAGCAGAACAC-3’) and ‘eGFP-2-R’ (5’-GAACTCCAGCAGGACCATG-3’), and 200 nM probe ‘eGFP-HEX’ (5’-HEX-AGCACCCAGTCCGCCCTGAGCA-BHQ1-3’) in a final volume of 25 µl.

Outer membrane protein A genotyping PCR

Samples that were positive for C psittaci in qPCR were subjected to an outer membrane protein A (ompA) genotyping PCR. Per sample, a reaction mix with a final volume of 50 µl containing 25 µl REDTaq ReadyMix (Merck KGaA), 200 nM of the primers ‘ompA F (CTU)’ (5’-ATGAAAAAACTCTTGAAATCGG-3’) and ‘ompA rev’ (5’-TCCTTAGAATCTGAATTGAGC-3’), and 3 µl sample template with a DNA concentration of 25 ng/µl was prepared.31 Cycling conditions were 10 minutes at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 49°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 60 seconds and a final elongation at 72°C for seven minutes. PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified amplicons were Sanger-sequenced by Microsynth. The obtained sequences were assembled and analysed using the Geneious Prime software version 2019.2.3 and compared against the National Center for Biotechnology Information database using the BLASTn tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

All primers and probes used in this study were obtained from Microsynth.

Results

Chlamydiaceae were detected in 0.9 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval: 0.3–2.6 per cent) of the birds (n=3) of three different species, namely in one of five (20 per cent, 3.6–62.5 per cent) fancy pigeons (Columba livia domestica), one of five (20 per cent, 3.6–62.5 per cent) common wood pigeons (Columba palumbus), and one of four (25 per cent, 4.6–69.9 per cent) Eurasian collared doves (Streptopelia decaocto), as shown in table 1. Five individual samples were positive for Chlamydiaceae: both choanal and cloacal swabs from the Eurasian collared dove and fancy pigeon, and a faecal swab from the common wood pigeon. Both choanal and cloacal swabs from the Eurasian collared dove and fancy pigeon were positive for C psittaci by species-specific qPCR. OmpA genotyping classified the organism detected in the cloacal sample of the Eurasian collared dove as C psittaci B. C psittaci detected in the choanal swab of the fancy pigeon belonged to the ompA genotype E.

C psittaci was not detected in the Chlamydiaceae-positive faecal swab of the common wood pigeon, and ompA genotyping was not successful due to low copy numbers (table 1). Thus, it was not possible to specify the detected Chlamydiaceae in this sample.

Discussion

The workers at the rehabilitation centre belong to the population at risk for zoonotic diseases transmitted by birds. Among all bird orders, Columbiformes and psittacine birds show the highest Chlamydia prevalence, ranging between 3.4 per cent and 50 per cent.22 23 In this study, three of 20 (15 per cent, 5.2–36.2 per cent) of the Columbiformes were positive for Chlamydiaceae, whereof two were positive for C psittaci. This is in accordance with the findings of other studies performed in Switzerland.20 21 C psittaci genotype B, which was found in one Eurasian collared dove, is the predominant genotype in the European pigeon population.22 32 33 Genotype E, which was found in one fancy pigeon, infects a variety of avian species and is frequently found in pigeons worldwide.34–37 Both genotypes are zoonotic, but human infection is mostly associated with genotype A causing a more severe course of disease.38–40

Chlamydiaceae were not detected in any other bird order included in this study. Partly, the low infection rate might be due to the selection of study samples. The majority of birds (n=246) were tested via faecal swabs only. Testing of faecal swabs has been shown to be a less sensitive method for detection of Chlamydiaceae compared with choanal swabs.41 Furthermore, most birds were nestlings (n=163) or juveniles (n=126), which were previously shown to have lower Chlamydiaceae prevalence than adult birds.18 However, these circumstances reflect the real conditions in the rehabilitation centre during the peak season. The findings in this study are in accordance with those of Zweifel and others,21 reporting low infection rates of non-C psittaci-Chlamydiaceae in songbirds (0.4 per cent) and waterfowl (4.3 per cent). In this study, excretion of Chlamydiaceae under stressful conditions in a bird rehabilitation centre was only present in pigeons. As pigeons mostly harbour C psittaci, they may therefore pose a hazard to workers at rehabilitation centres. In order to minimise the risk of zoonotic chlamydial transmission, protective equipment (eg, gloves, masks) should always be used and appropriate hygiene measures (eg, washing hands) should be adhered to when handling wild birds.42

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the team of the rehabilitation centre of the Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, for the collection of study samples, and Brigitte Sigrist from the NRGK, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, for the excellent technical assistance.

Footnotes

Contributors: SA, BV and NB designed the study. SS and PM performed the experiments. SS, HM and NW analysed the data. SS wrote the original draft. SA, BV, NB, HM, NW and PM reviewed and edited the original draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Ethics approval: All animal housing and sampling were conducted in strict accordance with the Swiss law of animal welfare. None of the birds was killed for this study. The birds of which choanal and cloacal swabs were taken were euthanased due to incurable trauma or disease before sampling.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data availability statement: All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

References

  • 1.Sachse K, Kuehlewind S, Ruettger A, et al. More than classical Chlamydia psittaci in urban pigeons. Vet Microbiol 2012;157:476–80. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vorimore F, Hsia R-C, Huot-Creasy H, et al. Isolation of a new Chlamydia species from the feral sacred IBIS (Threskiornis aethiopicus): Chlamydia ibidis. PLoS One 2013;8:e74823. 10.1371/journal.pone.0074823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Di Francesco A, Donati M, Laroucau K, et al. Chlamydiae in corvids. Vet Rec 2015;177:466. 10.1136/vr.103218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guo W, Li J, Kaltenboeck B, et al. Chlamydia gallinacea, not C. psittaci, is the endemic chlamydial species in chicken (Gallus gallus). Sci Rep 2016;6:19638. 10.1038/srep19638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Szymańska-Czerwińska M, Mitura A, Niemczuk K, et al. Dissemination and genetic diversity of chlamydial agents in Polish wildfowl: isolation and molecular characterisation of avian Chlamydia abortus strains. PLoS One 2017;12:e0174599. 10.1371/journal.pone.0174599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Laroucau K, Vorimore F, Aaziz R, et al. Chlamydia buteonis, a new Chlamydia species isolated from a red-shouldered hawk. Syst Appl Microbiol 2019;42:125997. 10.1016/j.syapm.2019.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stokes HS, Martens JM, Chamings A, et al. Identification of Chlamydia gallinacea in a parrot and in free-range chickens in Australia. Aust Vet J 2019;97:398–400. 10.1111/avj.12856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaleta EF, Taday EMA. Avian host range of Chlamydophila spp. based on isolation, antigen detection and serology. Avian Pathol 2003;32:435–61. 10.1080/03079450310001593613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shewen PE. Chlamydial infection in animals: a review. Can Vet J 1980;21:2–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vanrompay D, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F. Chlamydia psittaci infections: a review with emphasis on avian chlamydiosis. Vet Microbiol 1995;45:93–119. 10.1016/0378-1135(95)00033-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bundesamt für Lebensmittelsicherheit und Veterinärwesen (BLV) Informationssystem Seuchenmeldungen InfoSM, 2020. Available: https://www.infosm.blv.admin.ch [Accessed 3 Apr 2020].
  • 12.Beeckman DSA, Vanrompay DCG. Zoonotic Chlamydophila psittaci infections from a clinical perspective. Clin Microbiol Infect 2009;15:11–17. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02669.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Olsen B, Persson K, Broholm KA. PCR detection of Chlamydia psittaci in faecal samples from passerine birds in Sweden. Epidemiol Infect 1998;121:481–4. 10.1017/s0950268898001320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vlahović K, Matica B, Bata I, et al. Campylobacter, Salmonella and Chlamydia in free-living birds of Croatia. Eur J Wildl Res 2004;50:127–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schwarzová K, Betáková T, Neméth J, et al. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Chlamydophila psittaci in throat and cloacal swabs from birds migrating through Slovakia. Folia Microbiol 2006;51:653–8. 10.1007/BF02931634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sharples E, Baines SJ. Prevalence of Chlamydophila psittaci-positive cloacal PCR tests in wild avian casualties in the UK. Vet Rec 2009;164:16–17. 10.1136/vr.164.1.16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Krawiec M, Piasecki T, Wieliczko A. Prevalence of Chlamydia psittaci and other Chlamydia species in wild birds in Poland. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2015;15:652–5. 10.1089/vbz.2015.1814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Konicek C, Vodrážka P, Barták P, et al. DETECTION OF ZOONOTIC PATHOGENS IN WILD BIRDS IN THE CROSS-BORDER REGION AUSTRIA - CZECH REPUBLIC. J Wildl Dis 2016;52:850–61. 10.7589/2016-02-038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Geigenfeind I, Vanrompay D, Haag-Wackernagel D. Prevalence of Chlamydia psittaci in the feral pigeon population of Basel, Switzerland. J Med Microbiol 2012;61:261–5. 10.1099/jmm.0.034025-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mattmann P, Marti H, Borel N, et al. Chlamydiaceae in wild, feral and domestic pigeons in Switzerland and insight into population dynamics by Chlamydia psittaci multilocus sequence typing. PLoS One 2019;14:e0226088. 10.1371/journal.pone.0226088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zweifel D, Hoop R, Sachse K, et al. Prevalence of Chlamydophila psittaci in wild birds—potential risk for domestic poultry, pet birds, and public health? Eur J Wildl Res 2009;55:575–81. 10.1007/s10344-009-0275-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Magnino S, Haag-Wackernagel D, Geigenfeind I, et al. Chlamydial infections in feral pigeons in Europe: review of data and focus on public health implications. Vet Microbiol 2009;135:54–67. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.de Freitas Raso T, Seixas GHF, Guedes NMR, et al. Chlamydophila psittaci in free-living Blue-fronted Amazon parrots (Amazona aestiva) and Hyacinth macaws (Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus) in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Vet Microbiol 2006;117:235–41. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.06.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Holzinger-Umlauf HA, Marschang RE, Gravendyck M, et al. Investigation on the frequency of Chlamydia sp. infections in tits (Paridae). Avian Pathol 1997;26:779–89. 10.1080/03079459708419252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pennycott TW, Dagleish MP, Wood AM, et al. Chlamydophila psittaci in wild birds in the UK. Vet Rec 2009;164:157–8. 10.1136/vr.164.5.157-b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ehricht R, Slickers P, Goellner S, et al. Optimized DNA microarray assay allows detection and genotyping of single PCR-amplifiable target copies. Mol Cell Probes 2006;20:60–3. 10.1016/j.mcp.2005.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hoffmann B, Depner K, Schirrmeier H, et al. A universal heterologous internal control system for duplex real-time RT-PCR assays used in a detection system for pestiviruses. J Virol Methods 2006;136:200–9. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.05.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Blumer S, Greub G, Waldvogel A, et al. Waddlia, Parachlamydia and Chlamydiaceae in bovine abortion. Vet Microbiol 2011;152:385–93. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pantchev A, Sting R, Bauerfeind R, et al. New real-time PCR tests for species-specific detection of Chlamydophila psittaci and Chlamydophila abortus from tissue samples. Vet J 2009;181:145–50. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.02.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hoffmann B, Beer M, Schelp C, et al. Validation of a real-time RT-PCR assay for sensitive and specific detection of classical swine fever. J Virol Methods 2005;130:36–44. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.05.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sachse K, Laroucau K, Hotzel H, et al. Genotyping of Chlamydophila psittaci using a new DNA microarray assay based on sequence analysis of ompA genes. BMC Microbiol 2008;8:63. 10.1186/1471-2180-8-63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dolz G, Solórzano-Morales Á, Angelova L, et al. Chlamydia psittaci genotype B in a pigeon (Columba livia) inhabiting a public place in San José, Costa Rica. Open Vet J 2013;3:135–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wang X, Zhang N-Z, Ma C-F, et al. Epidemiological investigation and genotype of Chlamydia exposure in pigeons in three provinces in northern China. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2018;18:181–4. 10.1089/vbz.2017.2214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dickx V, Kalmar ID, Tavernier P, et al. Prevalence and genotype distribution of Chlamydia psittaci in feral Canada geese (Branta canadensis) in Belgium. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 2013;13:382–4. 10.1089/vbz.2012.1131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Beckmann KM, Borel N, Pocknell AM, et al. Chlamydiosis in British garden birds (2005-2011): retrospective diagnosis and Chlamydia psittaci genotype determination. Ecohealth 2014;11:544–63. 10.1007/s10393-014-0951-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Donati M, Laroucau K, Delogu M, et al. Chlamydia psittaci in Eurasian collared doves (Streptopelia decaocto) in Italy. J Wildl Dis 2015;51:214–7. 10.7589/2014-01-010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jeong J, An I, Oem J-K, et al. Molecular prevalence and genotyping of Chlamydia spp. in wild birds from South Korea. J Vet Med Sci 2017;79:1204–9. 10.1292/jvms.16-0516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rehn M, Ringberg H, Runehagen A, et al. Unusual increase of psittacosis in southern Sweden linked to wild bird exposure, January to April 2013. Euro Surveill 2013;18:20478. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wallensten A, Fredlund H, Runehagen A. Multiple human-to-human transmission from a severe case of psittacosis, Sweden, January-February 2013. Euro Surveill 2014;19:20937. 10.2807/1560-7917.es2014.19.42.20937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cadario ME, Frutos MC, Arias MB, et al. Epidemiological and molecular characteristics of Chlamydia psittaci from 8 human cases of psittacosis and 4 related birds in Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol 2017;49:323–7. 10.1016/j.ram.2017.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Andersen AA. Comparison of pharyngeal, fecal, and cloacal samples for the isolation of Chlamydia psittaci from experimentally infected cockatiels and turkeys. J Vet Diagn Invest 1996;8:448–50. 10.1177/104063879600800407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tolba HMN, Abou Elez RMM, Elsohaby I. Risk factors associated with Chlamydia psittaci infections in psittacine birds and bird handlers. J Appl Microbiol 2019;126:402–10. 10.1111/jam.14136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data

vetreco-2020-000437supp001.pdf (165KB, pdf)


Articles from Veterinary Record Open are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES