Viral RNA exported from the coronavirus replication organelle is likely to be mediated by a crown-shaped molecular pore.
A gateway to the cytosol
Coronaviruses transform host cell membranes into peculiar double-membrane vesicles that have long been thought to accommodate viral genome replication. However, because these compartments appeared to be completely sealed, it has remained unknown how the newly made viral RNA could be exported to the cytosol for translation and packaging into new virions. Wolff et al. used cryo–electron microscopy to identify a molecular pore that spans the double membrane (see the Perspective by Unchwaniwala and Ahlquist). Six copies of a large coronavirus transmembrane protein formed the core of this structure, which may constitute a viral RNA export channel and provide a target for future antiviral interventions.
Science, this issue p. 1395; see also p. 1306
Abstract
Coronavirus genome replication is associated with virus-induced cytosolic double-membrane vesicles, which may provide a tailored microenvironment for viral RNA synthesis in the infected cell. However, it is unclear how newly synthesized genomes and messenger RNAs can travel from these sealed replication compartments to the cytosol to ensure their translation and the assembly of progeny virions. In this study, we used cellular cryo–electron microscopy to visualize a molecular pore complex that spans both membranes of the double-membrane vesicle and would allow export of RNA to the cytosol. A hexameric assembly of a large viral transmembrane protein was found to form the core of the crown-shaped complex. This coronavirus-specific structure likely plays a key role in coronavirus replication and thus constitutes a potential drug target.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the third and most impactful example of a potentially lethal coronavirus infection in humans within the past 20 years (1–3). Coronaviruses are positive-stranded RNA (+RNA) viruses that replicate their unusually large genomes in the host cell’s cytoplasm. This process is supported by an elaborate virus-induced network of transformed endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes known as the viral replication organelle (RO) (4–7). Double-membrane vesicles (DMVs) are the RO’s most abundant component and the central hubs for viral RNA synthesis (5). The DMV’s interior accumulates double-stranded (ds) RNA, presumably intermediates of viral genome replication and subgenomic mRNA synthesis (4, 5). DMVs may offer a favorable microenvironment for viral RNA synthesis and may shield viral RNA from innate immune sensors that are activated by dsRNA. However, coronaviral DMVs have been characterized as compartments that lack openings to the cytosol (4–6), despite the fact that newly-made viral mRNAs need to be exported for translation. Moreover, the coronavirus genome needs to be packaged by the cytosolic nucleocapsid (N) protein before being targeted to virus assembly sites on secretory pathway membranes (8).
In this study, we used cryo–electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to analyze the structure of coronavirus-induced ROs in their native host cellular environment. The murine hepatitis coronavirus (MHV) is a well-studied model for the genus Betacoronavirus, which also includes severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and SARS-CoV-2. One advantage of MHV over these class 3 agents is the absence of serious biosafety constraints, thus making MHV suitable for in situ cryo-EM studies. We performed electron tomography (ET) on cryo-lamellae prepared by focused ion beam milling of cells in the middle stage of MHV infection. The tomograms revealed abundant perinuclear DMVs with an average diameter of 257 ± 63 nm (±SD), occasionally interconnected or connected to the ER as part of the reticulovesicular network described in previous work (Fig. 1, fig. S1, and movie S1) (4–7). In addition, macromolecular features that had not been discerned in conventional EM samples became apparent (figs. S2 to S4). The DMV lumen appeared to primarily contain filamentous structures that likely correspond to viral RNA (Fig. 1 and fig. S4). In part, this is expected to be present as dsRNA (4, 5), as supported by the relatively long, straight stretches observed in some of these filaments, consistent with the persistence length of dsRNA (9) (fig. S4).
Each DMV contained multiple copies of a molecular complex that spanned both membranes, connecting the DMV interior with the cytosol (Fig. 2A and supplementary text). Such complexes were also found in DMVs in prefixed SARS-CoV-2–infected cells (Fig. 2B and fig. S5). We surmise that this pore represents a generic coronaviral molecular complex that has a pivotal role in the viral replication cycle. Most likely, it allows the export of newly synthesized viral RNA from the DMVs to the cytosol. Functionally analogous viral complexes used for RNA export include those in the capsids of the Reoviridae (10) and, notably, the molecular pore in the neck of the invaginated replication spherules induced by flock house virus (11). None of these complexes, however, are integrated in a double-membrane organelle.
Subtomogram averaging of the double-membrane–spanning complexes in MHV-induced DMVs revealed an overall sixfold symmetry (Fig. 2, fig. S6, and movie S2). A cytosolic crown-like structure extended ~13 nm into the cytosol and was based on a ~24-nm-wide platform embedded in the DMV membranes. The two membranes did not fuse and maintained the typical DMV intermembrane spacing of ~4.5 nm (fig. S2). The complex formed a channel that followed its sixfold axis. On the DMV luminal side, the channel started with a ~6-nm-wide opening, narrowed toward the cytosol, and had two tight transition points (Fig. 2, J and L). The one at the level of the DMV outer membrane (Fig. 2J) was the most constricted, with an opening of ~2 to 3 nm, but would still allow the transition of RNA strands. Toward the cytosolic space, the complex opened into a crown-like structure, exposing six cytosolic “prongs.” With an achieved resolution of 3.1 nm, we roughly estimate that the complex has a total molecular mass of 3 MDa, of which the crown represents ~1.2 MDa (fig. S6).
We then considered the possible constituents of this complex. Coronaviruses express two large replicase polyproteins that are proteolytically cleaved into 16 nonstructural proteins (nsps) (12). Three of these nsps—nsp3 (222 kDa in MHV), nsp4 (56 kDa), and nsp6 (33 kDa)—are transmembrane proteins and thus are potential components of the pore. These nsps contain two, four, and six transmembrane domains (TMDs), respectively (13–15) (Fig. 3A), and engage in diverse homotypic and heterotypic interactions (16) thought to drive the formation of double-membrane ROs (17–19). On the basis of its size, the multidomain MHV nsp3 subunit is an attractive putative constituent of the pore. MHV nsp3 consists of a large cytosolic region of ~160 kDa, followed by two TMDs and a C-terminal cytosolic domain of ~41 kDa (13). Whereas the TMDs and C-terminal domain are highly conserved, the domain composition and size of the N-terminal part of nsp3 is quite variable among coronaviruses (16, 20). Several nsp3 domains, including the conserved N-terminal ubiquitin-like domain 1 (Ubl1; 12.6 kDa) that binds both single-stranded RNA (21) and the N protein (22, 23), may interact with viral RNA (16).
To investigate whether nsp3 is a component of the DMV molecular pore, we imaged cells infected with a well-characterized engineered MHV expressing nsp3 with an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) moiety fused to the Ubl1 domain [MHV-Δ2-GFP3 (24)] (fig. S7). This mutant lacks nsp2, which is dispensable for replication in cell culture (25). Subtomogram averaging of the pore complexes in these samples (Fig. 3B) revealed the presence of six additional densities on top of the prongs, each representing a mass compatible with that of EGFP (Fig. 3, C to E, and movie S3). These results identified nsp3 as a major constituent of the complex and provided insight into its orientation, with the Ubl1 domain residing in the prongs. Six copies of nsp3 can be envisioned to constitute most of the cytosolic crown-like structure (~1.2 MDa). Other viral and/or host proteins and lipids are probably also part of the ~1.8-MDa intermembrane platform, with nsp4 and nsp6 being prominent candidates. Notably, different studies suggest that nsp3-nsp4 interactions drive membrane pairing and determine DMV biogenesis and morphology (17–19, 26).
The molecular pores frequently appeared to interact with other macromolecules on both the cytosolic and DMV luminal sides (fig. S8). In the subtomogram averages, these appeared as largely blurred out densities (Fig. 2C), which suggests that the interactions are dynamic. A small region on the luminal side, however, had a relatively higher density and was resolved in the unsymmetrized average as a closely associated and slightly off-center mass (Fig. 2, M and N, and fig. S6D). We speculate that this mass may be part of the viral replication machinery. The coronaviral replication-transcription complex (RTC) is thought to consist of a subset of relatively small (~10 to 110 kDa) nsps, with the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (nsp12) at its core (27–29). However, some of these subunits may associate with the RTC only transiently, and the nsp stoichiometries of the complex are unknown. The luminal partners of the pore complex, prominent as masses varying in shape and size, appeared to interact with the putative RNA content of the DMVs (fig. S8).
The interaction partners of the cytosolic nsp3 prong ranged from chain-like masses to larger assemblies (fig. S8, black arrowheads). The subdomains of the long N-terminal nsp3 domain engage in a range of viral and virus-host interactions (16, 20); consequently, the list of possible interactors is substantial. Among them, the viral N protein (55 kDa), which binds to the nsp3 Ubl1 domain (22, 23), is a prominent candidate. The Ubl1-N interaction has been proposed to target viral RNA to replication sites at early stages of infection (23), but it may also modulate RNA exit and encapsidation on the cytosolic side of the pore complex. Notably, DMV-rich regions of the cytosol were crowded with protein assemblies that had a diameter of ~15 nm (fig. S9). These proteins strongly resembled the nucleocapsid structure in coronavirus particles, a helical ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex that consists of the RNA genome and N protein oligomers (30) (fig. S9).
Our findings suggest a pathway for newly made viral genomic RNA from the DMV interior, via the channel of the pore, to the cytosolic sites of encapsidation. In our model, specific replicase subunits may associate with the pore complex to guide the newly synthesized RNA toward it (Fig. 4A). As proposed for other +RNA viral ROs (11), only +RNAs would need to be exported, whereas negative-stranded templates and/or dsRNA intermediates could remain inside the DMVs. On the cytosolic side, all exported viral mRNAs may associate with the N protein (Fig. 4B). Alternatively, the accumulating N protein could serve to select part of the newly made genomes for packaging. The remainder would then be used for translation, together with the much smaller, though much more abundant, subgenomic mRNAs (31). Genome-containing RNP complexes would travel to the membranes where the viral envelope proteins accumulate and engage in the assembly of progeny virions (Fig. 4C) (32). These bud into single-membrane compartments (Fig. 4D), typically derived from the ER-to-Golgi intermediate compartment (8), and travel along the secretory pathway to be released into extracellular space.
The double-membrane–spanning molecular pore revealed here may constitute the exit pathway for coronaviral RNA products from the DMV’s interior toward the cytosol, with the large and multifunctional nsp3 being its central component. Although the exact mode of function of this molecular pore remains to be elucidated, it seems to be a key structure in the viral replication cycle that is likely conserved among coronaviruses and thus may offer a coronavirus-specific drug target.
Acknowledgments
We thank M. Denison for sharing MHV-Δ2-GFP3, L. Caly and J. Druce for providing SARS-CoV-2 isolate betaCoV/Australia/VIC01/2020, N. Ogando for BSL3 assistance, F. Faas for technical support, S. Howes and T. Sharp for advice on image processing and helpful discussions, J. Plitzko and M. Schaffer for introducing us to cryo–focused ion beam milling, and J. Wolff, Y. van der Meer, and H. Friedrich for support during the lockdown. EM tomography data of MHV-infected samples were collected at the Netherlands Centre for Electron Nanoscopy (NeCEN) with assistance from C. Diebolder and R. Dillard. Funding: Access to NeCEN was made possible through financial support from the Dutch Roadmap Grant NEMI (NWO grant 184.034.014). D.A.A. was supported by NIH grants R35GM118099 and U19 AI135990. S.Z. was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. K.G. was supported by BMBF grant 05K18BHA and DFG grants EXC 2155, INST 152/772-1, and INST 777-1 FUGG. E.J.S. was supported by the #wakeuptocorona crowdfunding initiative of the Leiden University Fund (LUF) and LUMC Bontius Foundation and by the SCORE project (European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, grant 101003627). Author contributions: Conceptualization: M.B., A.J.K., E.J.S., and G.W. Software: D.A.A. and S.Z. Validation: M.B. and G.W. Formal analysis: M.B. and G.W. Investigation: M.B., A.W.M.d.J., U.L., R.W.A.L.L., G.W., and J.C.Z.-D. Resources: K.G., A.J.K., and E.J.S. Data curation: M.B., R.I.K., and G.W. Writing – original draft: M.B., E.J.S., and G.W. Writing – review & editing: D.A.A., M.B., K.G., A.J.K., U.L., E.J.S., and G.W. Visualization: M.B., R.I.K., R.W.A.L.L., and G.W. Supervision: M.B., A.J.K., and E.J.S. Project administration: M.B. and E.J.S. Funding acquisition: A.J.K. and E.J.S. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Data and materials availability: SARS-CoV-2 isolate betaCoV/Australia/VIC01/2020 and MHV-Δ2-GFP can be shared on request upon authorization from their original source (SARS-CoV-2: Leon Caly and Julian Druce, Doherty Institute, Melbourne, Australia; MHV-Δ2-GFP3: Mark Denison, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, TN, USA). Cryo-EM maps have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank under accession codes EMD-11514 (wild-type MHV–induced molecular pore) and EMD-11515 (MHV-Δ2-GFP3–induced molecular pore). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This license does not apply to figures/photos/artwork or other content included in the article that is credited to a third party; obtain authorization from the rights holder before using such material.
Supplementary Materials
References and Notes
- 1.Ksiazek T. G., Erdman D., Goldsmith C. S., Zaki S. R., Peret T., Emery S., Tong S., Urbani C., Comer J. A., Lim W., Rollin P. E., Dowell S. F., Ling A. E., Humphrey C. D., Shieh W. J., Guarner J., Paddock C. D., Rota P., Fields B., DeRisi J., Yang J. Y., Cox N., Hughes J. M., LeDuc J. W., Bellini W. J., Anderson L. J., Group S. W.; SARS Working Group , A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1953–1966 (2003). 10.1056/NEJMoa030781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zaki A. M., van Boheemen S., Bestebroer T. M., Osterhaus A. D., Fouchier R. A., Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 1814–1820 (2012). 10.1056/NEJMoa1211721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W., Li X., Yang B., Song J., Zhao X., Huang B., Shi W., Lu R., Niu P., Zhan F., Ma X., Wang D., Xu W., Wu G., Gao G. F., Tan W., China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team, A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 727–733 (2020). 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Knoops K., Kikkert M., Worm S. H., Zevenhoven-Dobbe J. C., van der Meer Y., Koster A. J., Mommaas A. M., Snijder E. J., SARS-coronavirus replication is supported by a reticulovesicular network of modified endoplasmic reticulum. PLOS Biol. 6, e226 (2008). 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Snijder E. J., Limpens R. W. A. L., de Wilde A. H., de Jong A. W. M., Zevenhoven-Dobbe J. C., Maier H. J., Faas F. F. G. A., Koster A. J., Bárcena M., A unifying structural and functional model of the coronavirus replication organelle: Tracking down RNA synthesis. PLOS Biol. 18, e3000715 (2020). 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Maier H. J., Hawes P. C., Cottam E. M., Mantell J., Verkade P., Monaghan P., Wileman T., Britton P., Infectious bronchitis virus generates spherules from zippered endoplasmic reticulum membranes. mBio 4, e00801–e00813 (2013). 10.1128/mBio.00801-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ulasli M., Verheije M. H., de Haan C. A., Reggiori F., Qualitative and quantitative ultrastructural analysis of the membrane rearrangements induced by coronavirus. Cell. Microbiol. 12, 844–861 (2010). 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01437.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.de Haan C. A., Rottier P. J., Molecular interactions in the assembly of coronaviruses. Adv. Virus Res. 64, 165–230 (2005). 10.1016/S0065-3527(05)64006-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abels J. A., Moreno-Herrero F., van der Heijden T., Dekker C., Dekker N. H., Single-molecule measurements of the persistence length of double-stranded RNA. Biophys. J. 88, 2737–2744 (2005). 10.1529/biophysj.104.052811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ding K., Celma C. C., Zhang X., Chang T., Shen W., Atanasov I., Roy P., Zhou Z. H., In situ structures of rotavirus polymerase in action and mechanism of mRNA transcription and release. Nat. Commun. 10, 2216 (2019). 10.1038/s41467-019-10236-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ertel K. J., Benefield D., Castaño-Diez D., Pennington J. G., Horswill M., den Boon J. A., Otegui M. S., Ahlquist P., Cryo-electron tomography reveals novel features of a viral RNA replication compartment. eLife 6, e25940 (2017). 10.7554/eLife.25940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Snijder E. J., Decroly E., Ziebuhr J., The nonstructural proteins directing coronavirus RNA synthesis and processing. Adv. Virus Res. 96, 59–126 (2016). 10.1016/bs.aivir.2016.08.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oostra M., Hagemeijer M. C., van Gent M., Bekker C. P., te Lintelo E. G., Rottier P. J., de Haan C. A., Topology and membrane anchoring of the coronavirus replication complex: Not all hydrophobic domains of nsp3 and nsp6 are membrane spanning. J. Virol. 82, 12392–12405 (2008). 10.1128/JVI.01219-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oostra M., te Lintelo E. G., Deijs M., Verheije M. H., Rottier P. J., de Haan C. A., Localization and membrane topology of coronavirus nonstructural protein 4: Involvement of the early secretory pathway in replication. J. Virol. 81, 12323–12336 (2007). 10.1128/JVI.01506-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kanjanahaluethai A., Chen Z., Jukneliene D., Baker S. C., Membrane topology of murine coronavirus replicase nonstructural protein 3. Virology 361, 391–401 (2007). 10.1016/j.virol.2006.12.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Neuman B. W., Bioinformatics and functional analyses of coronavirus nonstructural proteins involved in the formation of replicative organelles. Antiviral Res. 135, 97–107 (2016). 10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Angelini M. M., Akhlaghpour M., Neuman B. W., Buchmeier M. J., Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural proteins 3, 4, and 6 induce double-membrane vesicles. mBio 4, e00524–e13 (2013). 10.1128/mBio.00524-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oudshoorn D., Rijs K., Limpens R. W. A. L., Groen K., Koster A. J., Snijder E. J., Kikkert M., Bárcena M., Expression and cleavage of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus nsp3-4 polyprotein induce the formation of double-membrane vesicles that mimic those associated with coronaviral RNA replication. mBio 8, e01658–e17 (2017). 10.1128/mBio.01658-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hagemeijer M. C., Monastyrska I., Griffith J., van der Sluijs P., Voortman J., van Bergen P. M., Henegouwen A. M., Vonk, P. J. Rottier, F. Reggiori, C. A. de Haan, Membrane rearrangements mediated by coronavirus nonstructural proteins 3 and 4. Virology 458–459, 125–135 (2014). 10.1016/j.virol.2014.04.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lei J., Kusov Y., Hilgenfeld R., Nsp3 of coronaviruses: Structures and functions of a large multi-domain protein. Antiviral Res. 149, 58–74 (2018). 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Serrano P., Johnson M. A., Almeida M. S., Horst R., Herrmann T., Joseph J. S., Neuman B. W., Subramanian V., Saikatendu K. S., Buchmeier M. J., Stevens R. C., Kuhn P., Wüthrich K., Nuclear magnetic resonance structure of the N-terminal domain of nonstructural protein 3 from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Virol. 81, 12049–12060 (2007). 10.1128/JVI.00969-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hurst K. R., Koetzner C. A., Masters P. S., Characterization of a critical interaction between the coronavirus nucleocapsid protein and nonstructural protein 3 of the viral replicase-transcriptase complex. J. Virol. 87, 9159–9172 (2013). 10.1128/JVI.01275-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cong Y., Ulasli M., Schepers H., Mauthe M., P. V’Kovski, F. Kriegenburg, V. Thiel, C. A. M. de Haan, F. Reggiori, Nucleocapsid protein recruitment to replication-transcription complexes plays a crucial role in coronaviral life cycle. J. Virol. 94, e01925–e19 (2020). 10.1128/JVI.01925-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Freeman M. C., Graham R. L., Lu X., Peek C. T., Denison M. R., Coronavirus replicase-reporter fusions provide quantitative analysis of replication and replication complex formation. J. Virol. 88, 5319–5327 (2014). 10.1128/JVI.00021-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Graham R. L., Sims A. C., Baric R. S., Denison M. R., The nsp2 proteins of mouse hepatitis virus and SARS coronavirus are dispensable for viral replication. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 581, 67–72 (2006). 10.1007/978-0-387-33012-9_10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gadlage M. J., Sparks J. S., Beachboard D. C., Cox R. G., Doyle J. D., Stobart C. C., Denison M. R., Murine hepatitis virus nonstructural protein 4 regulates virus-induced membrane modifications and replication complex function. J. Virol. 84, 280–290 (2010). 10.1128/JVI.01772-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kirchdoerfer R. N., Ward A. B., Structure of the SARS-CoV nsp12 polymerase bound to nsp7 and nsp8 co-factors. Nat. Commun. 10, 2342 (2019). 10.1038/s41467-019-10280-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sevajol M., Subissi L., Decroly E., Canard B., Imbert I., Insights into RNA synthesis, capping, and proofreading mechanisms of SARS-coronavirus. Virus Res. 194, 90–99 (2014). 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.10.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Subissi L., Imbert I., Ferron F., Collet A., Coutard B., Decroly E., Canard B., SARS-CoV ORF1b-encoded nonstructural proteins 12-16: Replicative enzymes as antiviral targets. Antiviral Res. 101, 122–130 (2014). 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gui M., Liu X., Guo D., Zhang Z., Yin C. C., Chen Y., Xiang Y., Electron microscopy studies of the coronavirus ribonucleoprotein complex. Protein Cell 8, 219–224 (2017). 10.1007/s13238-016-0352-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ogando N. S., Dalebout T. J., Zevenhoven-Dobbe J. C., Limpens R. W. A. L., van der Meer Y., Caly L., Druce J., de Vries J. J. C., Kikkert M., Bárcena M., Sidorov I., Snijder E. J., SARS-coronavirus-2 replication in Vero E6 cells: Replication kinetics, rapid adaptation and cytopathology. J. Gen. Virol. 10.1099/jgv.0.001453 (2020). 10.1099/jgv.0.001453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kuo L., Koetzner C. A., Masters P. S., A key role for the carboxy-terminal tail of the murine coronavirus nucleocapsid protein in coordination of genome packaging. Virology 494, 100–107 (2016). 10.1016/j.virol.2016.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Caly L., Druce J., Roberts J., Bond K., Tran T., Kostecki R., Yoga Y., Naughton W., Taiaroa G., Seemann T., Schultz M. B., Howden B. P., Korman T. M., Lewin S. R., Williamson D. A., Catton M. G., Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) from the first patient diagnosed with COVID-19 in Australia. Med. J. Aust. 212, 459–462 (2020). 10.5694/mja2.50569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wolff G., Limpens R. W. A. L., Zheng S., Snijder E. J., Agard D. A., Koster A. J., Bárcena M., Mind the gap: Micro-expansion joints drastically decrease the bending of FIB-milled cryo-lamellae. J. Struct. Biol. 208, 107389 (2019). 10.1016/j.jsb.2019.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hagen W. J. H., Wan W., Briggs J. A. G., Implementation of a cryo-electron tomography tilt-scheme optimized for high resolution subtomogram averaging. J. Struct. Biol. 197, 191–198 (2017). 10.1016/j.jsb.2016.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zheng S. Q., Palovcak E., Armache J. P., Verba K. A., Cheng Y., Agard D. A., MotionCor2: Anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017). 10.1038/nmeth.4193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rohou A., Grigorieff N., CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015). 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xiong Q., Morphew M. K., Schwartz C. L., Hoenger A. H., Mastronarde D. N., CTF determination and correction for low dose tomographic tilt series. J. Struct. Biol. 168, 378–387 (2009). 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.08.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Frangakis A. S., Hegerl R., Noise reduction in electron tomographic reconstructions using nonlinear anisotropic diffusion. J. Struct. Biol. 135, 239–250 (2001). 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kremer J. R., Mastronarde D. N., McIntosh J. R., Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116, 71–76 (1996). 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Castaño-Díez D., Kudryashev M., Arheit M., Stahlberg H., Dynamo: A flexible, user-friendly development tool for subtomogram averaging of cryo-EM data in high-performance computing environments. J. Struct. Biol. 178, 139–151 (2012). 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kucukelbir A., Sigworth F. J., Tagare H. D., Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63–65 (2014). 10.1038/nmeth.2727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Anger A. M., Armache J. P., Berninghausen O., Habeck M., Subklewe M., Wilson D. N., Beckmann R., Structures of the human and Drosophila 80S ribosome. Nature 497, 80–85 (2013). 10.1038/nature12104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pettersen E. F., Goddard T. D., Huang C. C., Couch G. S., Greenblatt D. M., Meng E. C., Ferrin T. E., UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004). 10.1002/jcc.20084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Harpaz Y., Gerstein M., Chothia C., Volume changes on protein folding. Structure 2, 641–649 (1994). 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00065-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Scheres S. H., RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012). 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lučič V., Rigort A., Baumeister W., Cryo-electron tomography: The challenge of doing structural biology in situ. J. Cell Biol. 202, 407–419 (2013). 10.1083/jcb.201304193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.V’kovski P., Gerber M., Kelly J., Pfaender S., Ebert N., Braga Lagache S., Simillion C., Portmann J., Stalder H., Gaschen V., Bruggmann R., Stoffel M. H., Heller M., Dijkman R., Thiel V., Determination of host proteins composing the microenvironment of coronavirus replicase complexes by proximity-labeling. eLife 8, e42037 (2019). 10.7554/eLife.42037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Neuman B. W., Joseph J. S., Saikatendu K. S., Serrano P., Chatterjee A., Johnson M. A., Liao L., Klaus J. P., Yates J. R. 3rd, Wüthrich K., Stevens R. C., Buchmeier M. J., Kuhn P., Proteomics analysis unravels the functional repertoire of coronavirus nonstructural protein 3. J. Virol. 82, 5279–5294 (2008). 10.1128/JVI.02631-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bárcena M., Oostergetel G. T., Bartelink W., Faas F. G., Verkleij A., Rottier P. J., Koster A. J., Bosch B. J., Cryo-electron tomography of mouse hepatitis virus: Insights into the structure of the coronavirion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 582–587 (2009). 10.1073/pnas.0805270106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.