Skip to main content
Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Oct 10:jiaa641. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa641

Rapid, sensitive and specific SARS coronavirus-2 detection: a multi-center comparison between standard qRT-PCR and CRISPR based DETECTR

Eelke Brandsma 1,#, Han J M P Verhagen 1,#, Thijs J W van de Laar 2,3, Eric C J Claas 4, Marion Cornelissen 5, Emile van den Akker 1,
PMCID: PMC7665660  PMID: 33535237

Abstract

Recent advances in CRISPR-based diagnostics suggest that DETECTR, a combination of isothermal reverse transcriptase loop mediated amplification (RT-LAMP) and subsequent Cas12 bystander nuclease activation by amplicon targeting ribonucleoprotein complexes, could be a faster and cheaper alternative to qRT-PCR without sacrificing sensitivity/specificity.

Here we compare DETECTR with qRT-PCR to diagnose COVID-19 on 378 patient samples.

Patient sample dilution assays suggest a higher analytical sensitivity of DETECTR compared to qRT-PCR, however, this was not confirmed in this large patient cohort, were we report 95% reproducibility between the two tests. These data showed that both techniques are equally sensitive in detecting SARS-CoV-2 providing additional value of DETECTR to the currently used qRT-PCR platforms. For DETECTR, different gRNAs can be used simultaneously to obviate negative results due to mutations in N-gene. Lateral flow strips, suitable as a point of care test (POCT), showed a 100% correlation to the high-throughput DETECTR assay. Importantly, DETECTR was 100% specific for SARS-CoV-2 relative to other human coronaviruses.

As there is no need for specialized equipment, DETECTR could be rapidly implemented as a complementary technically independent approach to qRT-PCR thereby increasing the testing capacity of medical microbiological laboratories and relieving the existent PCR-platforms for routine non-SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing.

Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, DETECTR, qRT-PCR


Articles from The Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES