Skip to main content
Open Forum Infectious Diseases logoLink to Open Forum Infectious Diseases
. 2020 Nov 3;8(1):ofaa521. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa521

Neopterin Predicts Disease Severity in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19

Rosa Bellmann-Weiler 1, Lukas Lanser 1, Francesco Burkert 1, Stefanie Seiwald 1, Gernot Fritsche 1, Sophie Wildner 1, Andrea Schroll 1, Sabine Koppelstätter 1, Katharina Kurz 1, Andrea Griesmacher 2, Günter Weiss 1,
PMCID: PMC7665702  PMID: 33442554

Abstract

This study evaluates the predictive value of circulating inflammatory markers, especially neopterin, in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Within this retrospective analysis of 115 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, elevated neopterin levels upon admission were significantly associated with disease severity, risk for intensive care unit admission, need for mechanical ventilation, and death. Therefore, neopterin is a reliable predictive marker in patients with COVID-19 and may help to improve the clinical management of patients.

Keywords: COVID-19, disease severity, neopterin, outcome, SARS-CoV-2


The pandemic of novel infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is an ongoing challenge for health care systems worldwide [1]. While most subjects experience a mild course of infection, between 15% and 20% need hospitalization, mostly because of shortness of breath and hypoxia on the basis of infection-induced pneumonia. During hospitalization, some patients deteriorate, then need noninvasive ventilation or intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mechanical ventilation. While age, male gender, and preexisting comorbidities have been found to increase the risk of a complicated course or death from the disease, no single biomarker has been found that identifies patients at risk when admitted to the hospital [2, 3]. Therefore, besides clinical presentation, reliable and easily available parameters that can aid in predicting disease course and planning optimal treatment are urgently needed.

Viral infection stimulates the formation of interferon gamma (IFN-γ), which activates monocytes and macrophages to produce the pteridine neopterin, which is an established biomarker in viral infection, but neopterin is also increased in other diseases involving activation of cellular immune function [4–6]. Neopterin in combination with C-reactive protein (CRP) allows a differentiation between viral and bacterial respiratory infections [7, 8]. Moreover, high neopterin levels have been associated with worse outcome in different viral infections [9–11], although increased interleukin (IL)-6 levels have been shown to be associated with cytokine storm in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and to be predictive of an increased risk of respiratory failure and death; IL-6 determination does not provide information on its source, as multiple cells and tissues can produce this protein [12]. In contrast, neopterin is exclusively produced by monocytic cells in response to stimulation by the T-helper cell type 1 (Th1)–derived cytokine IFN-γ, thereby providing information on the degree of cell-mediated immune activation in the setting of a specific disease [13]. We thus studied if neopterin, either alone or in combination of other established markers of inflammation such as CRP, procalcitonin (PCT), or IL-6, may be of value in predicting the clinical course of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

Study Population

We retrospectively analyzed the data and medical reports of 124 consecutive patients who were hospitalized for polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–proven coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection at our department at the Innsbruck University Hospital, Tyrol, Austria, between February and May 2020. Proof of infection was brought forward by positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA in naso- or oropharyngeal swab. Finally, 115 patients with available serum neopterin levels upon admission and/or during follow-up were included in further analyses. The data and laboratory parameters of patients were anonymized and extracted from the local clinical information system (KIS). For outcome analysis, we recorded fatal events, ICU admission, and need for mechanical ventilation during hospital stay. The cutoff date for still-hospitalized patients was May 12, 2020 (n = 13).

Patient Consent Statement

This study conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee of the Innsbruck Medical University (ID of ethical vote: 1167/2020). All patients gave written informed consent.

Laboratory Measurements

Blood samples were analyzed with fully automated tests in the Central Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnosis of the Innsbruck University Hospital, which undergoes regular internal and external quality controls and evaluations. Laboratory parameters were then extracted from the KIS for day 1 ± 1, day 4 ± 1, and day 7 ± 1 since hospitalization if available.

Neopterin was routinely measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Magellan BioScience Group, Tampa, FL, USA). As neopterin has been shown to be higher in patients with reduced kidney function [5, 14], estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with the CKD-EPI formula was used to calculate the ratio of neopterin/eGFR. IL-6 was detected with an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay on a Cobas8000 C602 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). CRP concentrations were measured with an immunoturbidimetric assay on a Cobas8000 C702 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). PCT was detected with an electrochemiluminescense immunoassay on a Cobas8000 C602 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany).

Statistical Analyses

We used the Shapiro-Wilk test to test for Gaussian distribution. Parameters are depicted as No. (%) or median (25th, 75th percentiles), as they were not normally distributed. The Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Pearson chi-square test were performed to test for significant differences between groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the effects of risk factors on probability of ICU admission or need for assisted ventilation. Non–normally distributed parameters were logarithmized with the natural logarithm for the logistic regression analysis. Only parameters with significance in the univariate logistic regression analysis were considered for multivariate logistic regression analysis. All tests were 2-tailed, and P values <.05 were regarded as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics, version 25.0 for Macintosh (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

Baseline Characteristics

We retrospectively analyzed 75 men (65.2%) and 40 women (34.8%) with a median age of 62 years (49–79 years), and 42 patients (36.5%) were over the age of 70; yet, the median age did not significantly differ between men and women (61 vs 63 years; P = 0.807). Symptoms had started 7 days (4–11 days) before hospital admission, and the median duration of hospital stay was 9 days (5–15 days), with men requiring significantly longer hospital treatment than women (10 days [7–19 days] vs 7 days [3–10 days]; P = 0.006).

Baseline characteristics of patients within the different neopterin levels upon admission are depicted in Table 1. Patients with severe disease according to the World Health Organization scoring system (score of 5 or higher) had a median neopterin level of 56.6 nmol/L with an interquartile range of 45.4–67.0 nmol/L compared with patients with less severe disease (34.7 nmol/L [15.7–50.7 nmol/L]; P < .001). Therefore, we chose a lower quartile value of 45 nmol/L as the cutoff for our subsequent evaluation. When calculating for associations between serum neopterin levels and routinely determined laboratory parameters upon admission, we found a significantly positive correlation with aspartate aminotransferase (AST; rs = 0.336; P < .001), IL-6 (rs = 0.555; P < .001), CRP (rs = 0.549; P < .001), and PCT levels (rs = 0.614; P < .001) and a significantly negative correlation with hemoglobin levels (rs = –0.277; P = .003), thrombocyte counts (rs = –0.325; P < .001), lymphocyte counts (rs = –0.503; P < .001), and eGFR (rs = –0.640; P < .001). Neopterin levels further correlated with the oxygen saturation (rs = –0.379; P < .001) and oxygen requirement (rs = 0.298; P = .002). When following these parameters over time, we found that mean neopterin and IL-6 levels were highest upon admission and then declined during the clinical course, whereas CRP levels fluctuated (Supplementary Figure 1A).

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Patients Within Different Neopterin Tertiles

≤25.0 nmol/L 25.1–45.0 nmol/L >45.0 nmol/L
n = 34 n = 33 n = 48
Neopterin Levels Median (IQR)
or No. (%)
Median (IQR)
or No. (%)
Median (IQR)
or No. (%)
P Valuea
Demographic characteristics
 Age, y 50 (36–62) 57 (47–71) 75 (61–80) <.001
 BMI, kg/m2 25.10 (22.20–26.20) 26.30 (24.45–28.05) 26.85 (24.00–30.20) .188
 Sex, men 17 (50.0) 22 (66.7) 36 (75.0) .0463
Clinical characteristics
 Temperature, °C 36.7 (36.2–37.4) 37.3 (36.6–37.9) 37.0 (36.2–38.2) .032
 SpO2, % 96 (94–98) 95 (92–96) 92 (89–95) <.001
 O2 requirement, L 0 (0–0) 0 (0–1) 1 (0–3) .003
 pO2, mmHg 72.9 (62.1–84.3) 61.4 (57.7–77.3) 70.1 (62.9–73.5) .290
 pCO2, mmHg 35.9 (32.8–39.6) 36.0 (34.6–37.8) 35.9 (32.9–41.8) .881
 Hospitalization, db 6 (4–9) 9 (7–12) 15 (8–27) <.001
 ICU admissionc 2 (6.7) 5 (20.8) 13 (68.4) <.001
 Mechanic ventilationc 1 (3.3) 4 (16.7) 12 (63.2) <.001
 Death during hospital stayd 0 (0.0) 3 (9.4) 8 (19.0) .028
 Duration of symptoms until hospitalization, d 8.50 (4.00–13.00) 6.00 (3.00–12.00) 6.50 (4.00–10.00) .228
Laboratory parameters
 eGFR, mL/min 99.7 (90.2–109.6) 91.4 (80.9–99.2) 61.8 (41.0–82.0) <.001
 AST, U/L 25 (21–36) 34 (24–49) 44 (31–61) .001
 ALT, U/L 20 (16–30) 23 (16–38) 29 (18–48) .113
 Hemoglobin, g/L 140 (133–153) 131 (124–156) 131 (117–145) .046
 Thrombocytes, G/L 263 (188–305) 175 (146–252) 199 (146–257) <.001
 Leukocytes, G/L 6.1 (5.2–7.6) 5.1 (3.7–6.2) 6.1 (4.5–8.8) .025
 Lymphocytes absolute, G/L 1.58 (1.13–1.89) 0.97 (0.76–1.18) 0.89 (0.68–1.01) <.001
 CRP, mg/dL 0.86 (0.17–3.74) 4.48 (1.56–8.68) 7.49 (3.60–14.93) <.001
 IL-6, ng/L 8.5 (2.3–30.6) 26.3 (15.8–62.5) 74.9 (32.6–186.5) <.001
 PCT, ng/mL 0.00 (0.00–0.06) 0.08 (0.06–0.15) 0.20 (0.08–0.57) <.001

Data depicted in bold indicate significant differences between groups.

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ICU, intensive care unit; IL-6, interleukin 6; IQR, interquartile range; O2, oxygen; pCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PCT, procalcitonin; pO2, oxygen partial pressure; SpO2, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation.

aKruskal-Wallis test or Pearson chi-square test.

bWithout patients who died during hospital stay.

cOnly patients under the age of 70 with available neopterin levels (n = 73).

dDischarged patients only.

Neopterin Is Predictive of the Outcome of COVID-19 Patients

Taking into account the severe stress of ICU treatment with highly invasive ventilation and sedation described in the literature and seen in real life at our clinics, as well as the multiple risk factors and comorbidities of elderly patients associated with a fatal outcome, we aimed at an early stratification. Because of the limited benefit for these patients, elderly multimorbid patients were eventually not referred to the ICU [15]. Therefore, to estimate the predictive potential of the markers under investigation for ICU admission or the need for mechanical ventilation, only patients aged <70 years (n = 73) were evaluated, while for death prediction all patients irrespective of age were included (n = 115). To evaluate the association of elevated neopterin levels with patients’ clinical course, we established different cutoff levels for the course of infection. Herein, patients with neopterin levels > 45 nmol/L upon hospital admission (n = 48, 38.7%) had a significantly higher risk of death during hospital stay (19.0% vs 4.5%; P = .018) (Supplementary Figure 1B), ICU admission during hospital stay (68.4% vs 10.4%; P < .001) (Supplementary Figure 1C), and need of mechanical ventilation (63.2% vs 7.5%; P < .001) (Supplementary Figure 1D) compared with patients with neopterin levels ≤45 nmol/L (n = 67, 58.3%). These patients were further characterized by longer hospital stays, older age, lower oxygen saturation and higher oxygen requirement, higher temperature, and impaired renal function upon hospital admission (Table 1).

In logistic regression analysis, patients with neopterin levels > 45 nmol/L had a >4-fold higher risk of death during hospital stay (odds ratio [OR], 4.784; 95% CI, 1.190–19.240; P = .027) when compared with patients with neopterin levels ≤45 nmol/L. In patients under the age of 70 years (n = 73), neopterin levels >45 nmol/L were further associated with a 14-fold higher risk of ICU admission during their hospital stay (OR, 14.548; 95% CI, 4.162–50.852; P < .001) and a 16-fold higher risk of need for mechanical ventilation (OR, 16.800; 95% CI, 4.534–62.252; P < .001) compared with patients with neopterin levels ≤45 nmol/L. This was independent of sex, age, and oxygen saturation in multivariate logistic regression analysis, and also true when correcting neopterin levels for renal function by calculating a neopterin/eGFR ratio (Table 2).

Table 2.

Logistic Regression Analyses in Terms of Risk for ICU Admission During Hospital Stay and Need for Mechanical Ventilationa

Logistic Regression Analysis
Risk for ICU Admission Need for Mechanical Ventilation
Univariate Model Multivariate Model Univariate Model Multivariate Model
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Demographic characteristics
 Age, y 1.043 1.001–1.088 .047 0.938 0.858–1.026 .164 1.049 1.000–1.101 .051
 Women vs men 0.224 0.060–0.847 .027 0.118 0.008–1.829 .126 0.216 0.045–1.028 .054
Clinical characteristics
 SpO2, % 0.847 0.754–0.952 .005 0.969 0.788–1.192 .768 0.829 0.731–0.941 .004 0.977 0.818–1.167 .795
 O2 requirement, Lb 1.538 1.185–1.997 .001 1.457 0.854–2.484 .167 1.736 1.257–2.399 .001 1.434 0.874 -2.352 .154
Laboratory parameters
 eGFR, mL/min 0.975 0.951–0.999 .043 0.977 0.952–1.003 .081
 Leukocytes, G/L 1.535 1.218–1.936 <.001 1.348 1.114–1.631 .002
 Lymph absolute, G/Lb 0.234 0.078–0.708 .010 0.249 0.081–0.765 .015
 CRP, mg/dLb 3.245 1.816–5.796 <.001 5.360 2.266–12.679 <.001
 IL-6, ng/Lb 4.621 2.154–9.914 <.001 4.724 2.155–10.356 <.001
 PCT, ng/mLb 1.412 0.936–2.129 .100 1.400 0.892–2.199 .144
 Neopterin, nmol/Lb 9.243 2.553–33.468 .001 16.456 3.215–84.222 .001
 Neopterin/eGFR ratiob 4.915 1.893–12.758 .001 7.054 2.220–22.418 .001
 Neopterin at day 7, nmol/Lb 22.073 2.416–201.652 .006 24.567 2.482–242.174 .006
 Neopterin/eGFR ratiob at day 7 8.052 1.683–38.525 .009 11.200 1.746–71.854 .011
Classifications
 Neopterin >45 nmol/L vs ≤45 nmol/L 14.548 4.162–50.852 <.001 16.800 4.534–62.252 <.001 7.025 1.161–42.511 .034
 Neopterin/eGFR ratio >0.650 vs ≤0.650 6.400 1.772–23.110 .005 25.049 1.123–558.583 .042 5.833 1.615–21.075 .007
 IL-6 >80 ng/L vs ≤80 ng/L 68.000 12.472–370.739 <.001 142.956 3.462–5902.918 .009 46.375 10.287–209.059 <.001 7.664 0.500–117.585 .144
 CRP >5 mg/dL vs ≤5 mg/dL 9.880 3.125–31.238 <.001 0.319 0.024–4.342 .391 10.789 2.787–41.773 .001 0.581 0.050–6.787 .665

Data depicted in bold indicate significant differences between groups.

Parameters were recorded at day 1 ± 1 if not otherwise depicted. The chi-square test was 37.157 (P < .001) for the multivariate model of ICU admission (n = 67—only patients with all included parameters available) and 24.993 (P < .001) for the multivariate model of need for mechanical ventilation (n = 67—only patients with all included parameters available).

Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ICU, intensive care unit; IL-6, interleukin 6; O2, oxygen; OR, odds ratio; PCT, procalcitonin; SpO2, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation.

aPatients under the age of 70 only (n = 73).

bLogarithmized because not normally distributed.

DISCUSSION

In being produced by cytokine IFN-γ, the macrophage-derived pteridine neopterin has become an established marker in different viral infections including HIV and influenza, where it was linked to disease activity, prediction of clinical course, and differentiation from bacterial infections [8–11]. In addition, neopterin levels corresponded to severity and outcome of different infectious and/or inflammatory diseases [10, 11].

To our knowledge, this is the first study that has evaluated neopterin in SARS-CoV-2 infection and demonstrated its important clinical and predictive potential in this infection. Neopterin levels >45 nmol/L allow early identification of hospitalized patients at risk of requiring mechanical ventilation and ICU treatment even upon admission, indicating a severe and prolonged course of infection. Neopterin levels decrease over time, however, which may be attributed to diminished viral activity even in patients on mechanical ventilation and those with resolution of inflammation, as evidenced by parallel reduction of IL-6 levels [16]. The associations of high neopterin levels with an increased risk of need for mechanical ventilation, ICU treatment, and adverse outcomes recommend neopterin as a reliable parameter for predicting the prognosis of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients and adapting the treatment algorithm for such patients with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Specifically, patients with high neopterin levels at initial presentation need intensified monitoring and likewise early referral to noninvasive ventilation to reduce the likelihood for mechanical ventilation and ICU admission, which are associated with potential complications and long-term care. The association of high neopterin with an adverse clinical course is in line with the idea that more advanced, T-cell-triggered immune activation is a major driver of adverse outcomes. The diagnostic benefit of neopterin over IL-6 is due to the fact that neopterin is induced by the Th-1 cytokine IFN-γ, thereby more specifically reflecting T-helper cell type 1–derived immune activation and stimulation of monocytic cell effector functions. This is in line with recent observations demonstrating that T-cell activation plays an important role in triggering severe pulmonary inflammation and impaired ventilation in SARS-CoV-2 infections [17, 18]. However, our results indicate that at initial presentation of COVID-19, patients needing hospitalization present with both, an activated IFN-γ pathway and a stimulated acute phase response, as reflected by IL-6, which predict the subsequent clinical course [19].

A limitation of our study is that we have not evaluated baseline radiographic features by computed tomography. Therefore we cannot provide information on whether increased neopterin levels are linked with more pronounced pathologic alterations on such images.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author.

ofaa521_suppl_Supplementary_Figure_S1

Acknowledgments

Financial support. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Potential conflicts of interest. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Prior presentation. The information within this manuscript has not been presented before.

References

  • 1. Bedford J, Enria D, Giesecke J, et al. ; WHO Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Infectious Hazards COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic. Lancet  2020; 395:1015–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. ;  China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med  2020; 382:1708–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wang X, Fang J, Zhu Y, et al.  Clinical characteristics of non-critically ill patients with novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) in a Fangcang hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect  2020; 26:1063–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fuchs D, Weiss G, Wachter H. Neopterin, biochemistry and clinical use as a marker for cellular immune-reactions. Int Arch Allergy Imm  1993; 101:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Lanser L, Pölzl G, Fuchs D, et al.  Neopterin is associated with disease severity and outcome in patients with non-ischaemic heart failure. J Clin Med  2019; 8, 2230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Reibnegger G, Fuchs D, Fuith LC, et al.  Neopterin as a marker for activated cell-mediated immunity: application in malignant disease. Cancer Detect Prev  1991; 15:483–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bellmann-Weiler R, Ausserwinkler M, Kurz K, et al.  Clinical potential of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin serum concentrations to guide differential diagnosis and clinical management of pneumococcal and Legionella pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol  2010; 48:1915–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Pizzini A, Lunger F, Sahanic A, et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of inflammatory parameters including neopterin in the setting of pneumonia, COPD, and acute exacerbations. COPD  2017; 14:298–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Geisler S, Lytton SD, Toan NL, et al.  Neopterin levels and Kyn/Trp ratios were significantly increased in dengue virus patients and subsequently decreased after recovery. Int J Infect Dis  2020; 91:162–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. De Scheerder MA, Van Hecke C, Zetterberg H, et al.  Evaluating predictive markers for viral rebound and safety assessment in blood and lumbar fluid during HIV-1 treatment interruption. J Antimicrob Chemother  2020; 75:1311–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Bellmann-Weiler R, Schroecksnadel K, Holzer C, et al.  IFN-gamma mediated pathways in patients with fatigue and chronic active Epstein Barr virus-infection. J Affect Disord  2008; 108:171–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Chen LYC, Hoiland RL, Stukas S, et al.  Confronting the controversy: interleukin-6 and the COVID-19 cytokine storm syndrome. Eur Respir J  2020; 56:2003006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Fuchs D, Weiss G, Wachter H. Neopterin, biochemistry and clinical use as a marker for cellular immune reactions. Int Arch Allergy Immunol  1993; 101:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Estelberger W, Weiss G, Petek W, et al.  Determination of renal clearance of neopterin by a pharmacokinetic approach. FEBS Lett  1993; 329:13–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lee J, Abrukin L, Flores S, et al.  Early intervention of palliative care in the emergency department during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Intern Med. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Pedersen SF, Ho YC. SARS-CoV-2: a storm is raging. J Clin Invest  2020; 130:2202–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. McGonagle D, Sharif K, O’Regan A, Bridgewood C. The role of cytokines including interleukin-6 in COVID-19 induced pneumonia and macrophage activation syndrome-like disease. Autoimmun Rev  2020; 19:102537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Peng Y, Mentzer AJ, Liu G, et al. ; Oxford Immunology Network Covid-19 Response T cell Consortium; ISARIC4C Investigators Broad and strong memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells induced by SARS-CoV-2 in UK convalescent individuals following COVID-19. Nat Immunol  2020; 21:1336–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Tanaka T, Narazaki M, Masuda K, Kishimoto T. Regulation of IL-6 in immunity and diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol  2016; 941:79–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ofaa521_suppl_Supplementary_Figure_S1

Articles from Open Forum Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES