Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2020 Nov 10;9:e60939. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60939

Reprogramming of bone marrow myeloid progenitor cells in patients with severe coronary artery disease

Marlies P Noz 1, Siroon Bekkering 1, Laszlo Groh 1, Tim MJ Nielen 2, Evert JP Lamfers 2, Andreas Schlitzer 3, Saloua El Messaoudi 4, Niels van Royen 4, Erik HJPG Huys 5, Frank WMB Preijers 5, Esther MM Smeets 6, Erik HJG Aarntzen 6, Bowen Zhang 7, Yang Li 1,7, Manita EJ Bremmers 8, Walter JFM van der Velden 8, Harry Dolstra 5, Leo AB Joosten 1,9, Marc E Gomes 2, Mihai G Netea 1,10, Niels P Riksen 1,
Editors: Matthias Barton11, Noriaki Emoto12
PMCID: PMC7665893  PMID: 33168134

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is the major cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Monocyte-derived macrophages are the most abundant immune cells in atherosclerotic plaques. In patients with atherosclerotic CVD, leukocytes have a hyperinflammatory phenotype. We hypothesize that immune cell reprogramming in these patients occurs at the level of myeloid progenitors. We included 13 patients with coronary artery disease due to severe atherosclerosis and 13 subjects without atherosclerosis in an exploratory study. Cytokine production capacity after ex vivo stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNCs) and bone marrow MNCs was higher in patients with atherosclerosis. In BM-MNCs this was associated with increased glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. The BM composition was skewed towards myelopoiesis and transcriptome analysis of HSC/GMP cell populations revealed enrichment of neutrophil- and monocyte-related pathways. These results show that in patients with atherosclerosis, activation of innate immune cells occurs at the level of myeloid progenitors, which adds exciting opportunities for novel treatment strategies.

Research organism: Human

Introduction

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD), including myocardial infarction and stroke, is the leading cause of death worldwide. Major risk factors for CVD include dyslipoproteinemia, smoking, hypertension, obesity, and diabetes. However, despite optimal pharmacological treatment of these risk factors, a considerable residual CVD risk remains. Evidence is rapidly accumulating that chronic low-grade inflammation of the vascular wall is a key pathophysiological component of atherosclerosis, and that treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs, such as canakinumab and colchicine, additionally lowers future CVD risk (Nidorf et al., 2020; Ridker et al., 2017; Tardif et al., 2019). More detailed knowledge of this inflammatory process and the role of individual immune cells would allow the development of more specific and safe anti-inflammatory therapies.

Within atherosclerotic plaques, monocyte-derived macrophages are the most abundant immune cells, which play a key role in initiation, progression, and destabilization of these plaques, although the mechanisms driving the persistent inflammatory activation are poorly understood (Moore et al., 2013). In patients with CVD or risk factors for CVD, circulating leukocytes show differences in composition and individual cell phenotypes, compared to healthy individuals. Isolated monocytes from patients with CVD are characterized by an increased cytokine production capacity and higher glycolytic metabolism (Bekkering et al., 2016; Elsenberg et al., 2013; Shirai et al., 2016). This also holds true for patients with increased CVD risk due to familial hypercholesterolemia (Bekkering et al., 2019). In addition, higher circulating levels of granulocytes are associated with an increased CVD risk in a general population study (Fani et al., 2020).

Experimental studies in animal models of atherosclerosis have revealed reprogramming of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in the bone marrow as a cause of these changes in circulating innate immune cells under conditions that predispose to CVD, including hyperlipidemia (Christ et al., 2018), and stress (Heidt et al., 2014). Western-type diet feeding of low-density lipoprotein receptor deficient (Ldlr-/-) mice induces inflammatory activation of monocytes by epigenetic reprogramming of HSPCs which persists in normocholesterolemic conditions (Christ et al., 2018). This resembles the finding of persistent functional and transcriptional hyperresponsive monocytes in patients with dyslipidemia despite cholesterol-lowering treatment (Bekkering et al., 2019). In a retrospective analysis of bone marrow samples from cancer patients, HSPCs had a higher proliferative potential in patients with known atherosclerotic CVD than in control patients (van der Valk et al., 2016). A detailed assessment, however, of HSPC composition and function in patients with atherosclerosis is lacking.

Here we performed a comprehensive study in patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD). We obtained circulating leukocytes and HSPCs and assessed composition with flow cytometry, as well as cytokine production capacity, metabolism, and the transcriptional profile. In addition, we performed 2’-deoxy-2’-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron-emission-tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) scanning to detect bone marrow and splenic activity. We report that bone marrow mononuclear cells in patients with atherosclerosis are characterized by enhanced cytokine production capacity and an increased metabolic rate. Flow cytometry and RNAseq analysis revealed inflammatory transcriptional reprogramming and myeloid skewing. These results show that in patients with atherosclerosis, activation of the innate immune system occurs at the level of bone marrow myeloid progenitors, which adds exciting opportunities for novel treatment strategies.

Results

Group characteristics

Thirteen individuals with CAD due to severe atherosclerosis with a median Total Plaque Score (TPS) of 14[9-15], and thirteen individuals without coronary atherosclerosis (TPS = 0) participated in the study (Table 1). As expected, patients with atherosclerosis more often received lipid-lowering therapy with statins, which was associated with a lower total and LDL-cholesterol concentration. All outcomes were corrected for the age and BMI because these are known modulators of innate immune cell function (Ter Horst et al., 2016).

Table 1. Group characteristics.

Characteristics Individuals with CAD (n = 13) Individuals without atherosclerosis (n = 13)
Age (years) 59.8 ± 9.7 52.2 ± 10.4
Sex (% men, n) 100 (13) 100 (13)
BMI (kg/m2) 27.8 ± 2.8 25.8 ± 2.5
SBP (mm Hg) 133 ± 15 126 ± 10
DBP (mm Hg) 90 ± 8* 84 ± 6
Hypertension (%, n) 93 (12)** 31 (4)
Current smoking (%, n) 23 (3) 31 (4)
Calcium score (HU) 445 [213-781]** 0 [0]
Total Plaque score (0–16)‡ 14 [9-15]*** 0 [0]
Lipid-lowering therapy (%, n) 77 (10)*** 8 (1)
Acetylsalicylic acid use (%, n) 69 (9)*** 0 (0)
ACE-inhibitor use (%, n) 23 (3) 8 (1)
β-blocker use (%, n) 23 (3) 8 (1)
Glucose (mmol/L) 5.9 ± 0.8 5.7 ± 0.7
Creatinine (µmol/L) 89 ± 14 91 ± 16
Tchol (mmol/L) 4.51 ± 0.86** 5.61 ± 0.61
LDLc (mmol/L) 2.52 ± 0.97** 3.56 ± 0.64
HDLc (mmol/L) 1.25 ± 0.31 1.51 ± 0.34
TG (mmol/L) 1.98 ± 1.97 1.20 ± 0.38
nHDLc (mmol/L) 3.26 ± 1.06* 4.11 ± 0.75

Data are reported as mean ± SD, as mean (number of participants), or as median [interquartile range] and compared with the appropriate statistical tests. ‡ TPS was calculated for participants with a calcium score of <400 HU (n = 6). † Data is missing for one participant. * indicates p<0.05, **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001.

Circulating inflammatory markers

The distribution of immune cells and monocyte subpopulations was similar between groups (Table 2). Integrin CD11b expression on monocytes tended to be higher in patients with CAD (p=0.09). Circulating endothelial dysfunction marker E-selectin was higher in patients with atherosclerosis (p<0.05).

Table 2. Circulating immune cells and inflammatory markers in patients and controls.

Cell types Individuals with CAD Individuals without atherosclerosis
WBC (106/mL) 5.5 [4.9–6.0] 5.4 [4.8–6.7]
Neutrophils (106/mL) 3.2 [2.5–3.6] 3.0 [2.6–4.0]
Lymphocytes (106/mL) 1.7 [1.3–1.9] 1.8 [1.5–2.5]
Monocytes (106/mL) 0.53 [0.42–0.67] 0.55 [0.45–0.66]
Monocytes (%) 9.8 [8.0–11.5] 9.3 [7.7–11.1]
Classical monocytes (%gated) 78.1 [72.8–80.3] 72.8 [70.1–85.5]
Intermediate monocytes (%gated) 9.8 [8.2–14.2] 10.1 [7.6–13.7]
Nonclassical monocytes (%gated) 12.2 [9.3–14.3] 13.1 [6.3–18.2]
CCR2+ monocytes (%gated) 80.5 [73.0–82.3] 77.6 [71.4–86.3]
CD11b expression monocytes (MFI) 10490 [7814–12025]^ ††6978 [6512–10041]
CD41+ monocytes (%gated) 7.8 [6.5–9.7] 8.7 [7.6–8.9]
Inflammatory markers
IL-1β (pg/mL) 0.12 [0.09–0.17] 0.12 [0.06–0.15]
IL-1Ra (pg/mL) 271 [197-338] 212 [165-253]
IL-6 (pg/mL) 2.31 [1.37–2.86] 1.61 [1.23–2.19]
IL-18 (pg/mL) 162 [127-227] 195 [144-236]
hsCRP (pg/mL) 1.66 [0.83–4.87] 1.37 [0.53–3.84]
E-selectin (ng/mL) 11.74 [7.65–15.10]* 8.45 [4.52–14.06]
VCAM-1 (ng/mL) 773 [711-859]^ 769 [643-844]
MMP2 (ng/mL) 354 [264-434] 341 [250-427]

Circulating concentrations of cells and inflammatory markers in individuals with CAD (n = 13) compared to individuals without atherosclerosis (n = 13). Median with [IQR]. P-values are corrected for age and BMI with ANCOVA. Outliers were removed with an SD of >2.5 of Z-scores. † Data is missing for one participant. *p<0.05, **p<0.01. HSPCs: hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Cytokine production capacity of circulating PBMCs is higher in atherosclerosis

Previously, we showed in a comparable study cohort that the LPS-induced production of IL-6, TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-8 in PBMCs was higher in patients with CAD compared to controls (Bekkering et al., 2016). We could confirm this in the current study for IL-8 (p<0.01), with a similar pattern for IL-6 (p=0.08) and TNFα (p=0.13) (Figure 1A). There were no significant differences in response to TLR2 agonist Pam3Cys stimulation (Figure 1B).

Figure 1. Cytokine production capacity of circulating PBMCs.

Figure 1.

(A) Cytokine production capacity of circulating PBMCs after LPS stimulation in control individuals (white bars, n = 13) and individuals with CAD (gray bars, n = 13). Geometric mean with 95% CI. (B) Table of cytokine/chemokine production (x-axis) after stimulation with LPS or P3C (y-axis) of PBMCs showing statistical differences between groups. The p-values are corrected for age and BMI with ANCOVA. Outliers were removed with an SD of >2.5 of Z-scores. * indicates p<0.05, **: p<0.01.

HSPC composition is changed in patients with CAD

We assessed the HSPC composition using flow cytometry. Although the total percentage of HSPCs was similar between groups, the percentage of multipotent progenitors (HSC/MPP, p<0.05) was higher in patients with CAD (Figure 2A,B). Trends for a higher percentage of common myeloid progenitors (CMP, p=0.06) and common lymphoid progenitors (CLP, p=0.08) were observed in patients with CAD (Figure 2C,D). In addition, the percentage of pre-monocytes was higher (p<0.05), which was associated with lower megakaryocyte erythrocyte progenitor percentages (MEP, p<0.05) (Figure 2F,G). Within the bone marrow, no difference in the percentage of monocytes (3.3 [3.1–4.4]% in patients versus 3.4 [3.0–4.6] in controls), and monocyte subpopulations, that is, classical (87 [82–88] % versus 82 [79-89]), intermediate (7.5 [7.1–10.8]% versus 9.3 [6.1–11.5]) and non-classical monocytes (5.1 [4.2–8.1]% versus 8.1 [3.6–11.4]), was observed. Interestingly, the percentage of circulating multipotent progenitors (HSC/MPP) was higher in patients with CAD (p<0.05) (Figure 2I). Similar patterns were found using absolute cell counts of progenitor populations.

Figure 2. Progenitor cell populations in the bone marrow compartment (A–G) and in the circulation (H and I).

Control individuals (white bars, n = 13) and individuals with CAD (gray bars, n = 13). HSC and MPP cell populations were combined as the CD90 expression marker was not available for n = 6 in each study group. Geometric mean with 95% CI. The p-values are corrected for age and BMI with ANCOVA. * indicates p<0.05, **: p<0.01. In top-down order: HSC indicates hematopoietic stem cell, MPP: multipotent progenitor, CLP: common lymphoid progenitor, CMP: common myeloid progenitor, GMP: granulocyte-macrophage progenitor, MEP: megakaryocyte erythrocyte progenitor.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Gating strategy of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the bone marrow.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

HSPCs were defined as CD45+CD34+CD38dim cells, after exclusion of dead cells and doublets. Next, the lymphoid lineage was excluded in CD19-CD117+ cells. In CD45RAdimCD38+ cells, CMP, GMP, MEP, and R1-3 progenitor populations were identified using CD123 and CD45RA expression, see Table for details. CD90 expression in CD38-CD45RA- cells determined MPP and HSC populations.

Functional and metabolic reprogramming of bone marrow MNCs in atherosclerosis

The immune response of BM-MNCs was determined after ex vivo 24-hour stimulation with TLR agonists. TNFα production after LPS stimulation was higher in patients with atherosclerosis (p<0.05), with similar patterns for IL-6 (p=0.12), IL-8 (p=0.10), and IL-1Ra (p=0.11) although these differences did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3A). There were no significant differences in response to Pam3Cys stimulation (Figure 3B).

Figure 3. Cytokine production capacity of bone marrow MNCs.

Figure 3.

(A) Cytokine production capacity of BM-MNCs after LPS stimulation in control individuals (white bars, n = 13) and individuals with CAD (gray bars, n = 13). Geometric mean with 95% CI. (B) Table of cytokine/chemokine production (x-axis) after stimulation with LPS or P3C (y-axis) of BM-MNCs showing statistical differences between groups. The p-values are corrected for age and BMI with ANCOVA. Outliers were removed with an SD of >2.5 of Z-scores. * indicates p<0.05, **: p<0.01.

Seahorse respirometry revealed that both the basal and maximal OCR was higher (p<0.01 and p<0.05) in BM-MNCs from patients with CAD compared to control subjects (Figure 4A,C), as well as the basal and maximal ECAR (p<0.01 and p<0.05) (Figure 4B,D). The measurements were repeated 2 hours after IFN-γ/LPS pre-incubation, in order to assess metabolic function during activation. Again, the maximal OCR (p<0.01) and maximal ECAR (p<0.05) were higher in patients with CAD.

Figure 4. Metabolism of BM-MNCs assessed with Seahorse respirometry in unstimulated condition and 2 hours after IFN-γ+LPS stimulation.

Figure 4.

(A, B) Oxygen consumption and extracellular acidification rates over time using treatment with Oligomycin, FCCP, and Rotenone/Antimycin A. (C, D) Bar graphs of control individuals (white bars, n = 13) and individuals with CAD (gray bars, n = 13). Geometric mean with 95% CI. The p-values are corrected for age and BMI with ANCOVA. * indicates p<0.05, **: p<0.01. IFN-γ+LPS: 2 hr IFN-γ and LPS stimulation.

Proliferation of BM-MNCs

Proliferation assays of BM-MNCs did not reveal significant differences in erythroid-, myeloid-, or granulocyte-macrophage progenitor proliferation rates between patients with CAD and healthy controls (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Proliferation capacity of bone marrow MNCs.

Figure 5.

Counted colonies per 103 cultured BM-MNCs of control individuals (white bars, n = 13) and individuals with CAD (gray bars, n = 13). Geometric mean with 95% CI. The p-values are corrected for age and BMI with ANCOVA. BFU-E indicates erythroid progenitor population, CFU-GEMM: myeloid progenitor population, CFU-GM: granulocyte-macrophage progenitor population.

Bone marrow progenitors of patients with CAD are primed to differentiate into an inflammatory myeloid lineage

To further understand the functional changes in HSPCs, we explored the transcriptional signature of HSC, MPP, and GMP cell populations. Differential expression analysis was applied to each population separately and a combined analysis of the populations to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes between patients and control samples. This identified 1747 genes that were differentially regulated in at least one of the cell populations (p≤0.05). A PCA analysis based on DE genes of HSC populations revealed a clear separation between patients and controls (Figure 6A). This was less pronounced for the MPPs and GMPs (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Among those DE genes, we observed that four genes were significantly upregulated in the patients compared to the controls in a combined analysis of HSCs, MPPs, and GMPs (Figure 6B, padj <0.1), including CCR2, EPB42, FNDC3B, and RBMS1. For individual log fold change (FC) and adjusted p-values, please see Figure 6—source data 1 and the combined and separated heatmaps for the top 50 DE genes for each population (Figure 6—figure supplements 2 and 3). Seven genes were differentially downregulated in the patients, including PFKP, CCDC163P, ARMCX4, PTK7, WDR90, ROBO3, and FAM84B. Within the HSC population, only PROK2 showed a significant upregulation (Figure 6—figure supplement 3), whereas in the MPPs and GMPs no genes showed significantly differential upregulation (Figure 6—figure supplement 3).

Figure 6. Transcriptome analyses of HSC, MPP, and GMP populations.

Control individuals (n = 10) versus individuals with CAD (n = 10) for each cell population. (A) Principle component analysis (PCA) based on differentially expressed (DE) genes of the HSC population; (B) Volcano plot showing differential expressed genes between patients with CAD and individuals without atherosclerosis, controlled for age, in a combined analysis of HSC, MPP, and GMP population. Genes with an FDR <0.1 are named; (C) Gene ontology enrichment analysis of DE genes from HSCs, MPPs, and GMPs, depicting the FDR and enrichment ratio.

Figure 6—source data 1. Contains source data for Figure 6B, and Figure 6—figure supplements 1B, 2, 3.
Table of differential expressed genes between patients with CAD and individualswithout atherosclerosis, controlled for age, in a combined/separated analysis of HSCs, MPPs, and GMPs population.
elife-60939-fig6-data1.xlsx (148.9KB, xlsx)
Figure 6—source data 2. Contains source data for Figure 6C.
Table of enrichment analysis of gene ontology terms and involved DE genes of HSCs, MPPs, and GMPs population.

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Transcriptome of HSC, MPP, and GMP populations.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

(A) PCA analysis based on DE genes of the GMP and MPP cell population; (B) Volcano plot showing differential expressed genes between CAD patients and controls, controlled for age, in the HSC, MPP, and GMP cell populations. Genes with an FDR <0.1 are called out.
Figure 6—figure supplement 2. Combined heatmap showing the top 50 DE genes for the HSC, MPP, and GMP cell populations in the patients and the control subjects.

Figure 6—figure supplement 2.

Genes with an FDR <0.1 are colored in red and blue for up- and down-regulated, respectively.
Figure 6—figure supplement 3. Separated heatmap showing the top 50 DE genes for each of the HSC, MPP, and GMP cell populations in the patients and the control subjects.

Figure 6—figure supplement 3.

Genes with an FDR <0.1 are colored in red and blue for up- and down-regulated, respectively.

Subsequently, we performed pathway enrichment analyses on disease-specific DE genes. The differentially upregulated genes of HSCs (p<0.05) showed significant enrichment for neutrophil and monocyte biological processes. These include neutrophil activation pathways, cytokine production pathways, and macrophage activation pathways (FDR <0.05) (Figure 6C). Transcriptional signatures of the genes enriched in the neutrophil-related pathways indicated upregulation of genes involved in the development and activation of neutrophils, such as insulin like growth factor two receptor (IGF2R), S100A11, and TNFRSF1B (Figure 6—source data 2). Additionally, there was an upregulation of signalling genes in the myeloid lineage, such as CCR2, innate immune signal transduction adaptor (MYD88), IL1RN, IL18R1, and Toll-like receptors TLR2 and TLR4. The differentially upregulated genes in the GMPs showed a similar enrichment for neutrophil-related pathways, and pathways related to myeloid cell differentiation and migration (Figure 6C). Upregulated genes in myeloid cell differentiation and regulation of hematopoiesis pathways revealed upregulation of important signalling and transcription factors, such as colony stimulating factor three receptor (CSF3R), NFKB inhibitor alpha (NFKBIA), signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1), STAT3, and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1). Repeating these analyses using p<0.01 showed that the observed enriched terms were robust (FDR <0.05).

RNA-seq data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accession number E-MTAB-9399.

Vascular wall inflammation and hematopoietic tissue activation measured with [18F]FDG PET/CT is not higher in patients with CAD

Vascular wall inflammation and hematopoietic tissue activity, as determined by [18F]FDG PET/CT-scan, was similar between patients with CAD and individuals without atherosclerosis (Figure 7). Correction for age, BMI, and glucose concentrations did not influence the results.

Figure 7. Vascular wall inflammation and hematopoietic tissue activation on [18F]FDG PET/CT scan.

Standard uptake value of each region in control individuals (white bars, n = 13) and individuals with CAD (gray bars, n = 13). Geometric mean with 95% CI. The p-values are corrected for age and BMI with ANCOVA.* indicates p<0.05, **: p<0.01. TBR: target SUV/mean blood pool SUV or mean liver SUV as background.

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Splenic activity correlates with progenitor cells and circulating immune cells.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

Linear regression with 95% CI (n = 26). Spearman correlation coefficient (rs). * indicates p<0.05, **: p<0.01. HSPCs: hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, GMP: granulocyte macrophage progenitor cells, WBC: white blood cells.

Interestingly, although the splenic activity was not significantly higher in patients with CAD, the splenic [18F]FDG-uptake correlated with HSPCs and with circulating immune cells (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). Splenic [18F]FDG-uptake correlated positively with CCR2 expression on HSPCs (rs = 0.604, p<0.01), with GMPs (rs = 0.405, p<0.05), and with circulating leukocyte (rs = 0.393, p<0.05) and monocyte counts (rs = 0.588, p<0.01).

Discussion

The role of activated innate immune cells in the development of atherosclerotic plaques is well-established. In the current paper we add an important dimension to this pathophysiological framework by showing for the first time that inflammatory reprogramming of innate immune cells in humans with coronary artery disease occurs at the level of HSPCs in the bone marrow. In patients with chronic CAD due to severe coronary atherosclerosis, isolated bone marrow mononuclear cells showed a higher cytokine production capacity and increased metabolic rate compared to individuals without coronary atherosclerosis. Transcriptional signatures of HSPCs were enriched for neutrophil and monocyte related pathways, indicating that the HSPCs are primed to differentiate into an inflammatory myeloid lineage. These findings addinclude an additional layer of inflammatory regulation in atherogenesis which potentially offers novel targets for pharmacological strategies to prevent or treat atherosclerotic CVD.

Our findings align with previous studies in animal models in atherosclerosis that show increased myelopoiesis in specific conditions that promote CVD. Accumulation of cholesterol in HSPC increases proliferation and mobilization from the bone marrow and a differentiation bias towards the myeloid lineage, which is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis (Yvan-Charvet et al., 2010). In an animal model of diabetes, higher circulating numbers of inflammatory Ly6-Chi monocytes and neutrophils are present, which is due to increased myelopoiesis. In this model, the increased myelopoiesis is driven by the increased expression of S100A8 and S100A9 in neutrophils (Nagareddy et al., 2013). Interestingly, the expression of one of the S100 proteins (S100A11) was also increased in the HSCs in patients with CAD in our study. Chronic psychological stress and disturbed sleep have also been reported to increase myelopoiesis, which is associated with elevated circulating levels of neutrophils and Ly6Chigh monocytes and augmented atherosclerosis compared with control mice (Heidt et al., 2014; McAlpine et al., 2019).

Since we did not include patients with specific cardiovascular risk factors, but rather with established symptomatic coronary atherosclerosis, we cannot conclude which factors are responsible for the HSPC reprogramming in our patients. BMI and blood pressure were slightly higher in the patients compared to the controls. Cholesterol concentrations were lower at the moment of inclusion in our study, but might well have been higher previously, since the patients also used more statins. We do not have information about stress and sleep patterns. Another mechanism that might contribute to the HSPC functional reprogramming is trained immunity. Trained immunity describes the phenomenon that brief stimulation of innate immune cells leads to the development of a long-term hyperresponsive phenotype. This is mediated by profound intracellular metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming and occurs both at the level of mature circulating monocytes as well as at the level of their bone marrow progenitors (Netea et al., 2020). Christ et al have recently described that a 4-week period of Western-type diet feeding in atherosclerosis prone Ldlr-/-mice induced a functional, transcriptional and epigenetic reprogramming of circulating myeloid cells and their bone marrow progenitors, which persisted for at least for weeks after switching back to a chow diet (Christ et al., 2018). This was associated with increased circulating concentrations of inflammatory monocytes and granulocytes. Functional enrichment analysis of GMPs showed overrepresentation of TNF and Toll-like receptor signaling pathways, which align with our observations. In contrast, although monocytic signature genes were enriched, most of the granulocytic signature genes were downregulated, including S100A8 and S100A9, in GMPs isolated from WD-fed as compared to CD-fed mice (Christ et al., 2018). Patients with hypercholesterolemia also have circulating monocytes with augmented cytokine production capacity, increased glycolytic metabolism, and enrichment of activating histone modifications, which persist for three months despite cholesterol lowering with statin therapy. Circulating monocyte and neutrophil numbers, however, were not increased in these patients (Bekkering et al., 2019). In our current patient cohort, it remains to be established whether trained immunity is present since we did not assess epigenetic markers in the HSPCs.

The observation that absolute numbers of myeloid progenitors and circulating monocytes and neutrophils are not increased, despite functional and transcriptional inflammatory programming, fits with the effects of alternative inducers of trained immunity in humans. Vaccination with the Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine induces trained immunity in humans in vivo (Arts et al., 2018). This is accompanied by an increased cytokine production capacity of bone marrow mononuclear cells, comparable to the result in patients with CAD in the current study (Cirovic et al., 2020). Also, 90 days post-BCG administration, HSPCs showed myeloid skewing with activation of neutrophil-associated pathways and pathways associated with regulation of immune responses, comparable to our patients. This functional and transcriptional reprogramming was accompanied by an increase in numbers of circulating myeloid cells in large cohorts of infants vaccinated with BCG (Cirovic et al., 2020).

In the patient group with CAD, the increased cytokine production capacity of the bone marrow mononuclear cell fraction was accompanied by an upregulation of both glycolytic metabolism as well as oxygen consumption by oxidative phosphorylation. It is important to realize that the bone marrow mononuclear fraction also contains large amounts of mature monocytes, so we cannot conclude on the metabolic landscape of HSPCs and specific progenitor subtypes. Isolated monocytes and monocyte-derived macrophages from patients with atherosclerosis are characterized by increased glycolysis, which is coupled to the hyperresponsiveness in terms of cytokine release (Bekkering et al., 2016; Shirai et al., 2016). Also, HSPCs of mice after induction of trained immunity with β-glucan have an upregulation of the glycolytic pathway (Mitroulis et al., 2018).

Analysis of the differentially upregulated genes transcriptome of the flow-sorted HSCs and GMPs showed significant enrichment for neutrophil activation pathways. This further supports a role for neutrophils in the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic CVD, which is suggested by various recent findings in the literature. Although neutrophils are the most abundant circulating white blood cell type, neutrophils only recently received attention in the context of cardiovascular inflammation. A large epidemiological study shows that circulating granulocyte counts are strongly associated with the occurrence of CVD (Fani et al., 2020). During atherogenesis, platelet-derived chemokines, such as CC-chemokine ligand 5, promote neutrophil activation and recruitment (Silvestre-Roig et al., 2020). At the luminal side, these activated neutrophils secrete granule proteins, including cathepsin G, which further promotes myeloid cell recruitment. Several actions further fuel atherosclerotic plaque formation, including secretion of reactive oxygen species and myeloperoxidase, which mediates oxidation of LDL, promoting foam cell formation (Silvestre-Roig et al., 2020). Also, neutrophils can form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) (Döring et al., 2020) and they can secrete pro-inflammatory microvesicles, which further fuel vascular wall inflammation and atherosclerosis (Gomez et al., 2020). Interestingly, a recent study used plasma proteomics analysis to explore the mechanism by which colchicine lowers cardiovascular risk in patients with CAD and showed mainly a downregulation of neutrophil activation pathways (Opstal et al., 2020).

Analysis of the individual significantly differentially expressed genes in the HSPCs showed that the glycolytic enzyme phosphofructokinase (PFKP) was downregulated in patients with CAD. Quiescent HSCs depend mainly on anaerobic glycolysis to sustain survival, quiescence, and retention within the bone marrow (Takubo et al., 2010). Once stimulated to divide, HSCs start to activate OXPHOS to meet metabolic demands of proliferation and differentiation (Karigane and Takubo, 2017). Therefore, the downregulation of PFKP might be related to the activation of HSCs. This finding is in contrast to the higher extracellular acidification rate of the bone marrow mononuclear cells which points to the activation of glycolysis. We speculate that this finding is dominated by the inflammatory activation of bone marrow monocytes, which constitute a large percentage of the bone marrow mononuclear cells. The chemokine receptor CCR2 showed significant upregulation in the HSPCs of the patients with CAD. CCR2 is critical for monocyte egress from the bone marrow and for the recruitment of circulating monocytes to the arterial wall (Tsou et al., 2007). The upregulation of CCR2 in our study might contribute to the increased circulating HSC percentage in patients with CAD. In mice, increased levels of circulating HSPCs are found after myocardial infarction that migrate to the spleen for extramedullary hematopoiesis (Dutta et al., 2012). In humans, splenic extramedullary hematopoiesis can occur in response to extreme physiologic stress (e.g. sepsis or hematologic malignancies), but has not been described yet during the development of CVD. Indirect evidence shows that splenic activity in humans is increased after myocardial infarction assessed with PET/CT scanning (van der Valk et al., 2016), suggesting increased immune cell activation. In our study, we observed a correlation between splenic activity and CCR2 expression on circulating HSPCs which might suggest that the spleen performs a role in human atherosclerosis.

Our study has several limitations. First, the sample size is relatively small. However, this sample size needs to be considered in the context of the invasive and complex nature of the study, and this sample size usually allows to detect relevant differences (Cirovic et al., 2020; van der Heijden et al., 2020). The sample size might also be an explanation for the lack of a significant difference in FDG uptake in the large arteries, which has been shown previously in patients with CVD. (Tarkin et al., 2014; van Wijk et al., 2014). Another possible explanation for our results is that our patients had severe mature coronary atherosclerotic plaques with calcium deposits, which are known to have less FDG uptake than uncalcified arterial plaques at the early stage of atherosclerosis (Fernández-Friera et al., 2019). In addition, lipid-lowering therapy is effective in reducing vascular wall inflammation (Pirro et al., 2019). Second, we did not explore epigenetic programs of the HSPCs. As such, we cannot conclude whether the mechanism of trained immunity contributes to our findings. This should be the focus of future studies. Third, in a study on symptomatic patients with CVD, it is inevitable to have differences in medication use compared to the healthy control group.

To summarize, our study is the first to prospectively assess HSPC phenotype in patients with CAD and is unique in providing a comprehensive phenotype by the integration of powerful tools such as RNAseq on flow-sorted HSPC populations, functional parameters, Seahorse respiratory, and PET imaging of vascular wall and hematopoietic activity. These results show that in patients with CAD, activation of the innate immune system occurs at the level of bone marrow myeloid progenitors, which adds exciting opportunities for novel treatment strategies.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type
(species) or
resource
Designation Source or
reference
Identifiers Additional
information
Biological sample (Homo sapiens) Peripheral blood Through venous puncture Freshly isolated from Homo sapiens, men, 18–75 years
Biological sample (Homo sapiens) Bone Marrow aspirate From the posterior iliac
crest according to standard practice
Freshly isolated from Homo sapiens
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD45 KO Beckman Coulter Clone J33 Cat# B36294, RRID:AB_2833027 (1:25)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal HLA-DR PE Beckman Coulter Clone immu-357 Cat# IM1639U RRID:AB_2876782 (1:10)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD14 PECy7 eBioscience Clone 61D3
Cat# 25-0149-42 RRID:AB_1582276
(1:25)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD16 FITC eBioscience Clone CB16 Cat# 11-0168-42
RRID:AB_10805747
(1:25)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD3 APC-Alexa750 Beckman Coulter Clone UCTH1 Cat# A66329
RRID:AB_2876783
(1:25)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD56 APC Beckman Coulter Clone N901 Cat# IM2474U
RRID:AB_2876784
(1:25)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD192 BV421 BD Biosciences Clone 48607 Cat# 564067, RRID:AB_2738573 (1:50)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD11b BV785 Biolegend Clone ICRF44
Cat# 301346, RRID:AB_2563794
(1:50)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD41 PerCP-Cy5.5 Biolegend Clone Hip8
Cat# 303719, RRID:AB_2561731
(1:50)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD90 FITC Biolegend Clone 5E10 Cat# 328107, RRID:AB_893438 (1:50)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD123 PE BD Biosciences Clone 9F5 Cat# 555644, RRID:AB_396001 (1:40)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD19 ECD Beckman Coulter Clone J4.119 Cat# IM2708U, RRID:AB_130854 (1:20)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD38 PC5.5 Beckman Coulter Clone LS198-4-3 Cat# IM2651U, RRID:AB_131166 (1:20)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD117 PEC7 Beckman Coulter Clone 104D2D1 Cat# IM3698, RRID:AB_131184 (1:20)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD45RA APC Beckman Coulter Clone 2H4LDH11LD89 (2H4) Cat# B14807
RRID:AB_2876787
(1:20)
Antibody Mouse monoclonal CD34-APC A750 Beckman Coulter Clone 581 Cat# A89309
RRID:AB_2876786
(1:20)
Commercial assay or kit DRAQ7 Biostatus Live/Dead stain (1:500)
Commercial assay or kit Human Cytokine Magnetic Magpix 25-plex panel Invitrogen MAGPIX platform
Commercial assay or kit SimplePlex cartridge ProteinSimple Ella platform
Commercial assay or kit Truseq small RNA primers Illumina
Commercial assay or kit hsCRP ELISA R&D DY1707
Commercial assay or kit VCAM-1 ELISA R&D DY809
Commercial assay or kit MMP2 ELISA R&D DY902
Commercial assay or kit E-selectin ELISA R&D DY724
Chemical compound, drug Pharm Lyse lysing buffer BD Biosciences
Chemical compound, drug Glutamine Invitrogen 2 mmol/L in RPMI
Chemical compound, drug Gentamycin Centrafarm 10 mg/mL in RPMI
Chemical compound, drug Pyruvate Invitrogen 1 mmol/L in RPMI
Chemical compound, drug Methocult GF Stemcell Technologies H84435
Sequence-based reagent Hg19 human Refseq transcriptome Li and Durbin, 2010 To align RNAseq
Peptide, recombinant protein Lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli Sigma-Aldrich Serotype 055:B5, L2880 10 ng/mL
Peptide, recombinant protein Pam3CysK4 EMC Microcollections L2000 10 ug/mL
Peptide, recombinant protein Interferon gamma Immukine, Boehringer Ingelheim BV 50 ng/mL for Seahorse
Peptide, recombinant protein Oligomycin Sigma-Aldrich 75351 1 mM for Seahorse
Peptide, recombinant protein FCCP Sigma-Aldrich C2920 1 mM for Seahorse
Peptide, recombinant protein Rotenone Sigma-Aldrich R8875 1.25 mM
Peptide, recombinant protein Antimycin A Sigma-Aldrich A8674 2.5 mM
Software,
algorithm
Kaluza Beckman Coulter Version 2.1 RRID:SCR_016182 Flow Cytometry
analysis
Software, algorithm MultiQC Ewels et al., 2016 RRID:SCR_014982 Quality check RNAseq
Software, algorithm DEseq2 v1.22.0 Love et al., 2014
BioConductor
RRID:SCR_015687 Differential gene expression RNAseq
Software, algorithm clusterProfiler v3.10.1 Yu et al., 2012
BioConductor
RRID:SCR_016884 RNAseq
Software, algorithm R 3.6.1 https://www.r-project.org/ RRID:SCR_001905
Software, algorithm TrueX algorithm EARL protocols
Software, algorithm Inveon Research Workspace 4.2 Preclinical Solutions, Siemens Medical Solutions 3D Gaussian filter kernel, 3.0 mm Postprocessing of FDG PET CT scanning
Software, algorithm PyRadiomics toolbox van Griethuysen et al., 2017 Analysis FDG PET CT
Software, algorithm SPSS V25.0 SPSS RRID:SCR_002865 Data analysis
Software, algorithm Prism v6.0 GraphPad software RRID:SCR_002798 Figures
Other Sysmex-XN 450 hematology analyzer Sysmex For total blood counts
Other CytoFLEX flow cytometer Beckman Coulter 13 color on CytExpert RRID:SCR_017217 Flow Cytometry Peripheral blood
Other Navios flow cytometer Beckman Coulter RRID:SCR_014421 Flow Cytometry Bone marrow Progenitors
Other XFp Analyzer Seahorse Bioscience
Other BD FACSAria II SORP Becton Dickinson RRID:SCR_018091 Flow cytometry sorting
Other Illumina Nextseq500 platform Illumina RRID:SCR_014983 RNAseq
Other Biograph 40 mCT scanner Siemens Healthineers ~2.1 MGq/kg FDG i.v. FDG PET CT

Participant selection

Participants (male, 18–75 years) were recruited among patients who were admitted for the evaluation of chest pain and underwent cardiac imaging at the Cardiology department of the Canisius Wilhelmina hospital or the Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands after January 1, 2015. Severe coronary atherosclerosis was defined as a calcium score >400 HU on computed tomography (CT), or a total plaque score (TPS) >4 on coronary CT angiography (CCTA), according to previously described standards (Bekkering et al., 2016; Pen et al., 2013). Control participants, with a calcium score and TPS of zero, were matched for age, body mass index (BMI), and smoking.

Criteria for exclusion were previous cardiovascular events, malignancies, auto-immune or auto-inflammatory diseases (including diabetes mellitus), chronic immunomodulatory drug use, chronic kidney disease (MDRD <45 mL/min), liver disease (ALAT > 135 U/L), or thrombocytopenia (<50 × 106/mL). Additionally, participants were excluded if they had an infection (>38,5°C or antibiotic treatment), hospital admission, or vaccination within 3 months before study entry. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board Arnhem/Nijmegen, the Netherlands, and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03172507). All individuals gave written informed consent.

Evaluation of atherosclerotic burden

CCTA total plaque score was calculated as previously described (Pen et al., 2013). Briefly, a 64-slice MDCT scanner (Philips) was used to obtain CAC and MDCT Image acquisition using an ECG-synchronized axial scan protocol and post-processing CT and CAC studies using IntelliSpace Philips software. Before image acquisition, beta-blockers were administered targeting a heart rate of <60 beats per minute, and patients received nitroglycerin 0.8 mg sublingually. Prospective electrocardiographically gated step-and-shoot contrast-enhanced MDCT imaging was performed, initiated from 10 mm above the level of the left main artery to 10 mm below the inferior myocardial apex with scan parameters being 64 × 0.625 mm sections (2.5 mm), collimation tube currents of 350 to 780 mAs and tube voltage of 100 or 120 kV. In the rare event that prospective scanning was not possible, retrospective or helix scanning was used.

Reconstruction of the MDCT scans was performed with reconstructed images obtained, using an ECG-triggered protocol, at 75% from the previous RR-interval, or at 75% and 40% from the previous RR-interval if a helix scan-protocol was used. The TPS was determined by summing the number of evaluable coronary segments with calcific or non-calcific plaque, or mixed plaque, where non-calcified and mixed plaque was assigned with one point and calcified plaque with 0 (maximum score = 16). Two independent experienced operators scored all CT images and both operators were blinded for all clinical information. In case of disagreement, the opinion of a third independent observer was asked.

Study design

Participants underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT scanning, follow by venepuncture and bone marrow aspiration within 2–14 days. The participants were invited in pairs (1 patient:1 control) for blood sampling and bone marrow aspiration from December 2017 till July 2018.

Cardiovascular risk assessment

Medical history, smoking status, medication use, BMI, and fasting glucose concentrations were obtained from all individuals. Blood pressure was measured three times by a manual sphygmomanometer after 5 min seated rest according to AHA guidelines. Fasting total cholesterol (Tchol), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), and triglycerides (TG) were measured using standardized methods, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) was calculated with the Friedewald formula.

Blood sampling and bone marrow aspiration

Bone marrow was aspirated from the posterior iliac crest according to standard practice by an experienced physician assistant. Blood was sampled through venous puncture. Sample collection was performed at 8.00–10.00 to avoid interference of circadian rhythms of immune parameters, and sample processing occurred within 2 hours. Plasma and serum were stored at −80°C until further use. Total blood cell counts were determined with an automated Sysmex-XN 450 hematology analyzer (Sysmex, Hamburg, Germany).

Mononuclear cell enrichment and stimulation

Before mononuclear cell (MNC) enrichment, the bone marrow aspirate was filtered and washed with sterile PBS. Thereafter, the same procedures were followed for peripheral blood MNCs (PBMCs) and bone marrow MNCs (BM-MNCs). PBMCs/BM-MNCs were isolated by Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL). Cell composition was evaluated by Sysmex analyzer (Sysmex) and with flow cytometry (Table 3, see key resource table (KRT) for RRIDs). PBMCs/BM-MNCs were resuspended in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 Dutch-modified culture medium (RPMI) (Life Technologies/Invitrogen, Waltham, USA) supplemented with 2 mmol/L glutamine (Invitrogen), 10 mg/mL gentamicin (Centrafarm, Etten-Leur, The Netherlands) and 1 mmol/L pyruvate (Invitrogen). Per well, 5 × 105 PBMCs/BM-MNCs were stimulated for 24 hours in duplicate in round-bottom 96-well plates (Corning, NY) with the following stimuli: RPMI, 10 ng/mL Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (serotype 055:B5 Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and 10 μg/mL Pam3CysK4 (P3C) (EMC Microcollections, Tübingen, Germany). After 24-hour incubation, supernatants were stored after plate centrifugation at −80°C until cytokine assessment.

Table 3. Cell composition of PBMC and BM-MNC fraction.

Cell types in PBMC fraction Controls Patients
Lymphocytes (%) 73 [68-79] 65 [62-75]*
Monocytes (%) 25 [19-31] 32 [23-35]
Neutrophils (%) 0.7 [0.6–1.1] 1.2 [0.6–1.7]
Cell types in BM-MNC fraction
HSPCs (%) 1.6 [1.2–2.0] 1.4 [1.2–4.7]

Cellular composition after mononuclear cell enrichment of peripheral blood and bone marrow. Median with [IQR]. Mann-Whitney U test. *: p<0.05, **: p<0.01. HSPCs: hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Cytokine measurements

Cytokine and chemokine concentrations were determined in supernatants using Human Cytokine Magnetic Magpix 25-plex panel (Invitrogen) on the MAGPIX platform (Luminex, Austin, TX). Circulating IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-6, and IL-18 concentrations were measured with the SimplePlex cartridge on the Ella platform (ProteinSimple, San Jose, CA). Additional circulating cytokines/chemokines concentrations were measured using ELISA (see KRT).

Flow cytometry

In the circulation, monocyte subpopulations and expression markers were determined with flow cytometry. 50 µL EDTA blood was stained after the lysis-no-wash strategy (BD Pharm Lyse lysing buffer, Becton Dickinson) by monoclonal antibodies CD45 Krome Orange ([KO], clone J33; Beckman Coulter, Cat# B36294, RRID:AB_2833027), HLA-DR PE (clone immu-357; Beckman Coulter, Cat# IM1639U, RRID:AB_2876782), CD14 PC7 (clone 61D3e Bioscience, Cat# 25-0149-42, RRID:AB_1582276), CD16 FITC (clone CB16; eBioscience Cat# 11-0168-42, RRID:AB_10805747), CD3 APC-Alexa750 (clone UCTH1; Beckman Coulter, Cat# AA66329, RRID:AB_2876783), CD56 APC (clone N901; Beckman Coulter, Cat# IM2474U, RRID:AB_2876784), CD192 Brilliant Violet421 ([BV421] clone 48607; Becton Dickinson, Cat#564067, RRID:AB_2738573), CD11b BV785 (clone ICRF44; Biolegend, Cat#301346, RRID:AB_2563794), CD41 PC5.5 (clone Hip8; Biolegend, Cat# 303719, RRID:AB_2561731) and measured with CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, RRID:SCR_017217). The gating strategy applied is shown in Supplementary file 1, gates were set with the fluorescence-minus-one method (Weber et al., 2016; Ziegler-Heitbrock et al., 2010). In short, monocytes were selected based on CD45+ HLA-DR+ and monocyte scatter properties, then CD3+ T-lymphocytes and CD56+ NK-cells were excluded, and monocyte subsets were identified in the CD14/CD16 plot as percentage of gated. Data was analyzed with Kaluza 3.1 software (Beckman Coulter, RRID:SCR_016182). Characterization of monocytes subsets is according to current recommendations (Weber et al., 2016; Ziegler-Heitbrock et al., 2010).

Bone marrow progenitors were identified with Navios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, RRID:SCR_014421). 5 × 106 Bone marrow cells were washed, lysed, and stained for 20 min with the monoclonal antibodies: CD90 FITC (Clone 5E10; Biolegend Cat#328107, RRID:AB_893438), CD123 PE (Clone 9F5; BD Biosciences, Cat#555644, RRID:AB_396001), CD19 ECD (Clone J3.119; Beckman Coulter, Cat# IM2708U, RRID:AB_130854), CD38 PC5.5 (Clone LS198-4-3; Beckman Coulter, Cat# IM2651U, RRID:AB_131166), CD117 PEC7 (Clone 104D2D1; Beckman Coulter, Cat# IM3698, RRID:AB_131184), CD45RA APC (Clone 2H4LDH11LD89; Beckman Coulter, Cat# B14807, RRID:AB_2876787), DRAQ7 (Biostatus), CD34-APC A750 (Clone 581; Beckman Coulter, Cat# A89309, RRID:AB_2876786), CD192 PB (Clone 48607; Becton Dickinson, Cat# 564067, RRID:AB_2738573), CD45 KO (Clone J33; Beckman Coulter, Cat# B36294, RRID:AB_2833027). The target input was set at 1 × 106 measured events, panels were balanced with the fluorescence-minus-one method to determine spill over, spectral overlap, and nonspecific binding.

The gating strategy is displayed in Figure 2—figure supplement 1. In short, HSPCs were defined as CD45+CD34+CD38dim/+ cells, after selecting for singlets and alive cells. Next, the lymphoid lineage was excluded by the gating of CD19-CD117+ cells. In CD45RAdimCD38+ gated cells, CMP, GMP, MEP, and R1-3 progenitor populations were identified using CD123 and CD45RA expression. CD90 expression in CD38-CD45RA- cells determined MPP and HSC populations. Data were analyzed with Kaluza 2.1 software.

Proliferation assays

2.5 × 104 BM-MNCs were cultured in methylcellulose medium containing erythropoietin, G(M)-CSF, IL-3 and IL-6 (MethoCult GF H84435, Stemcell technologies, Vancouver, Canada) and 2% fetal bovine serum (Integro B.V., Zaandam, The Netherlands) in Petri dishes for 14 days in 37°C 5% CO2 incubator. After 14 days, erythroid progenitor (BFU-E), common myeloid progenitor (CFU-GEMM), and granulocyte-macrophage progenitor (CFU-GM) cell colonies were counted in duplo by an experienced hematology operator.

Mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis assays

Using a modified protocol from Shirai et al., 2016, 2 × 106 BM-MNCs were plated per well in fivefold to overnight-calibrated cartridges in assay medium (DMEM with 1 mM L-Glutamine, 11 mM glucose, and 1 mM pyruvate [pH adjusted to 7.4]) and incubated for 1 hr in a non-CO2-corrected incubator at 37°C. In addition, BM-MNCs were stimulated with 50 ng/mL interferon gamma (IFN-γ) (Immukine, Boehringer Ingelheim BV, Alkmaar, The Netherlands) and 10 ng/mL LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 hr. Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) were measured via XFp Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, North Billerica, MA), with final concentrations of 1 mM oligomycin, 1 mM FCCP, and the combination of 1.25 mM rotenone and 2.5 mM antimycin A.

RNA sequencing of sorted progenitor populations and circulating monocytes

HSPCs were sorted by BD FACSAria II SORP flow cytometer sorter (Becton Dickinson, RRID:SCR_018091), using the flow cytometric panel as described above (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). BM-MNCs stored in liquid nitrogen were gently thawed in fetal calf serum (in house) containing 1.25 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 mg/mL DNase I (Sigma). HSCs, MPPs, and GMPs populations were directly sorted in 100 µL TRIzol (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA) before processing for RNA sequencing.

Total RNA was extracted using the standard TRIzol (ThermoFisher) protocol and used for library preparation and sequencing. mRNA was processed as described previously, following an adapted version of the single-cell mRNA seq protocol of CEL-Seq (Hashimshony et al., 2012; Simmini et al., 2014). In brief, samples were barcoded with CEL-seq primers during reverse transcription and pooled after second strand synthesis. The resulting cDNA was amplified with an overnight in vitro transcription reaction. From this amplified RNA, sequencing libraries were prepared with Illumina Truseq small RNA primers (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Paired-end sequencing was performed on the Illumina Nextseq500 platform (RRID:SCR_014983). Read one was used to identify the Illumina library index and CEL-Seq sample barcode. Read two was aligned to the hg19 human RefSeq transcriptome using BWA (Li and Durbin, 2010). Reads that mapped equally well to multiple locations were discarded. RNA input for all samples was normalized, and libraries for each progenitor population were sequenced in a single run.

Bioinformatics, differential gene expression, and pathway analysis

Reads were mapped to hg19 human reference genome using BWA (Li and Durbin, 2010). MultiQC (RRID:SCR_014982) was used to quality check all the samples (Ewels et al., 2016). In total, 107,565,838 reads were mapped in 59 progenitor populations, with one GMP population failed to pass quality control. Raw read counts provided the input for differential gene expression analysis with DESeq2 (RRID:SCR_015687) (Love et al., 2014) after excluding genes with less than 50 reads. Internal variance stabilizing transformation was used for regressing out age and to normalize the data (Benjamini–Hochberg correction was used to adjust p-value for multiple testing correction). In the differential expression analyses within HSC populations, one HSC population was marked as an outlier and further filtered out as it located three standard deviations away from mean values in principle component analysis of this study.

Differential gene expression analysis was carried out after regressing out age with DESeq2 v1.22.0 in R (RRID:SCR_001905) (Love et al., 2014), with internal statistical and normalization method (i.e. correction for multiple testing with Benjamini–Hochberg). The average expression between individuals with atherosclerosis (n = 10) and matched individuals without atherosclerosis (n = 10) was analyzed for each progenitor population. Enrichment analysis was performed using R package clusterProfiler (RRID:SCR_016884) (Yu et al., 2012) with Gene Ontology terms (Ashburner et al., 2000). After BH adjustment, a FDR <0.05 in enrichment analysis was considered significant.

[18F]FDG PET and low-dose CT scanning

Participants underwent [18F]FDG PET with low-dose non-contrast-enhanced CT from skull base to the trochanter major on a dedicated Siemens Biograph 40 mCT scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). After adhering to a 24-hour low-carbohydrate diet and 6 hours of fasting,~2.1 MBq/kg [18F]FDG was administered intravenously, as described previously (Bucerius et al., 2016). Glucose concentrations were obtained (5.3 ± 0.5 mmol/L) after injection. Before scanning, participants rested in the supine position for 2 hours.

Images were reconstructed according to EARL protocols; using a TrueX algorithm with point spread function (PSF) and time-of-flight (TOF) measurements, using three iterations, 21 subsets, matrix size 200 × 200 (pixel spacing of 4.07 mm), full width half maximum (FWHM) of 3 mm and using 2 min of PET data. Postprocessing was performed using a 3D Gaussian filter kernel, 3.0 mm, using the Inveon Research Workspace 4.2 (Preclinical Solutions, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Knoxville, TN).

[18F]FDG-uptake in the vascular wall was determined in seven regions of interest (ROI) by a single investigator (MPN); the aorta ascendens, aorta descendens, abdominal aorta, the left and right common carotid arteries, and the left and right iliac arteries. [18F]FDG-uptake in hematopoietic tissue was assessed in the spleen, lumbal vertebrae L2 and L3, and in the left and right medullary bone of the femur. These regions of interest were evaluated using the Inveon Research Workspace 4.2. The standardized uptake value (SUV) was extracted from each ROI after correction for [18F]FDG dose (MBq) and BMI using the PyRadiomics toolbox (van Griethuysen et al., 2017). The SUVs of left and right ROIs (e.g. left and right carotid artery) were averaged. Next, the target-to-background ratio (TBR) was calculated as the ratio of the vascular wall SUV and the mean thoracic arterial blood pool SUV. The TBRs of hematopoietic tissue were expressed as the ratio of the mean liver SUV. The primary outcome is the TBR, as recommended by the European guideline (Bucerius et al., 2016).

Statistical analysis

This study is exploratory, hence no sample size calculation is performed. Normal distribution of the data was checked with the Shapiro-Wilk test, when the p-value reached <0.05 this assumption was violated and non-parametric tests were used. Data are reported as mean ± SD with independent samples T-test according to Levene’s test for equality of variances, as mean (number of participants) with Χ2 test for categorical data, and as median [interquartile range] with Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametrical data. Outliers were removed with a standard deviation >± 2.5 of Z-scores. All outcomes were log(10)-transformed and thereafter corrected with ANCOVA for confounding demographics such as age and BMI. SPSS V25.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, RRID:SCR_002865) and Graphpad Prism v6.0 (GraphPad software, La Jolla, CA, RRID:SCR_002798) were used for data analysis and visualization. A two-sided p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Cor Jacobs for performing the flow cytometric measurements, and Rob Woestenenk for his expertise with flow sorting at the Radboud technology center flow cytometry.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Niels P Riksen, Email: niels.riksen@radboudumc.nl.

Matthias Barton, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Noriaki Emoto, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Japan.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Horizon 2020 667837 to Leo AB Joosten, Mihai G Netea, Niels P Riksen.

  • Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research NWO SPI 94-212 to Mihai G Netea.

  • European Commission 833247 to Mihai G Netea.

  • ERA-NET 2018T093 to Niels P Riksen.

  • Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research 452173113 to Siroon Bekkering.

  • Hartstichting 2018T028 to Siroon Bekkering.

  • Hartstichting CVON2018-27 to Leo AB Joosten, Mihai G Netea, Niels Peter Riksen.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Project administration.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing.

Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review and editing.

Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review and editing.

Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review and editing.

Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing - review and editing.

Investigation, Writing - review and editing.

Supervision, Investigation, Writing - review and editing.

Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - review and editing.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing - review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - review and editing.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing - review and editing.

Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision, Methodology, Writing - review and editing.

Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing.

Supervision, Methodology, Writing - review and editing.

Supervision, Methodology, Writing - review and editing.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing - review and editing.

Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent was obtained for all participants. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board Arnhem/Nijmegen, the Netherlands and registered at the ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03172507).

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Gating strategy of circulating immune cells (related to Table 2).

Monocytes were selected based on CD45+ HLA-DR+ and monocyte scatter properties, after exclusion of dead cells and doublets. Then CD3+ lymphocytes and CD56+ NK-cells were excluded, and monocyte subsets were identified in the CD14/CD16 plot as the percentage of gated. CD11b and CCR2 expression was determined on the monocyte population.

elife-60939-supp1.pdf (5.3MB, pdf)
Transparent reporting form

Data availability

RNA-seq data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accession number E-MTAB-9399.

The following dataset was generated:

Noz M, Bekkering S, Riksen NP, Netea MG. 2020. Bone marrow progenitor cell populations of patients with severe coronary artery disease. ArrayExpress. E-MTAB-9399

References

  1. Arts RJW, Moorlag S, Novakovic B, Li Y, Wang SY, Oosting M, Kumar V, Xavier RJ, Wijmenga C, Joosten LAB, Reusken C, Benn CS, Aaby P, Koopmans MP, Stunnenberg HG, van Crevel R, Netea MG. BCG vaccination protects against experimental viral infection in humans through the induction of cytokines associated with trained immunity. Cell Host & Microbe. 2018;23:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology the gene ontology consortium. Nature Genetics. 2000;25:25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bekkering S, van den Munckhof I, Nielen T, Lamfers E, Dinarello C, Rutten J, de Graaf J, Joosten LA, Netea MG, Gomes ME, Riksen NP. Innate immune cell activation and epigenetic remodeling in symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerosis in humans in vivo. Atherosclerosis. 2016;254:228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bekkering S, Stiekema LCA, Bernelot Moens S, Verweij SL, Novakovic B, Prange K, Versloot M, Roeters van Lennep JE, Stunnenberg H, de Winther M, Stroes ESG, Joosten LAB, Netea MG, Riksen NP. Treatment with statins does not revert trained immunity in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Cell Metabolism. 2019;30:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bucerius J, Hyafil F, Verberne HJ, Slart RH, Lindner O, Sciagra R, Agostini D, Übleis C, Gimelli A, Hacker M, Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Position paper of the cardiovascular committee of the european association of nuclear medicine (EANM) on PET imaging of atherosclerosis. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2016;43:780–792. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3259-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Christ A, Günther P, Lauterbach MAR, Duewell P, Biswas D, Pelka K, Scholz CJ, Oosting M, Haendler K, Baßler K, Klee K, Schulte-Schrepping J, Ulas T, Moorlag S, Kumar V, Park MH, Joosten LAB, Groh LA, Riksen NP, Espevik T, Schlitzer A, Li Y, Fitzgerald ML, Netea MG, Schultze JL, Latz E. Western diet triggers NLRP3-Dependent innate immune reprogramming. Cell. 2018;172:162–175. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cirovic B, de Bree LCJ, Groh L, Blok BA, Chan J, van der Velden WJFM, Bremmers MEJ, van Crevel R, Händler K, Picelli S, Schulte-Schrepping J, Klee K, Oosting M, Koeken VACM, van Ingen J, Li Y, Benn CS, Schultze JL, Joosten LAB, Curtis N, Netea MG, Schlitzer A. BCG vaccination in humans elicits trained immunity via the hematopoietic progenitor compartment. Cell Host & Microbe. 2020;28:322–334. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Döring Y, Libby P, Soehnlein O. Neutrophil extracellular traps participate in cardiovascular diseases: recent experimental and clinical insights. Circulation Research. 2020;126:1228–1241. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.315931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dutta P, Courties G, Wei Y, Leuschner F, Gorbatov R, Robbins CS, Iwamoto Y, Thompson B, Carlson AL, Heidt T, Majmudar MD, Lasitschka F, Etzrodt M, Waterman P, Waring MT, Chicoine AT, van der Laan AM, Niessen HW, Piek JJ, Rubin BB, Butany J, Stone JR, Katus HA, Murphy SA, Morrow DA, Sabatine MS, Vinegoni C, Moskowitz MA, Pittet MJ, Libby P, Lin CP, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf M. Myocardial infarction accelerates atherosclerosis. Nature. 2012;487:325–329. doi: 10.1038/nature11260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Elsenberg EH, Sels JE, Hillaert MA, Schoneveld AH, van den Dungen NA, van Holten TC, Roest M, Jukema JW, van Zonneveld AJ, de Groot PG, Pijls N, Pasterkamp G, Hoefer IE. Increased cytokine response after toll-like receptor stimulation in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2013;231:346–351. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.09.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3047–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fani L, van der Willik KD, Bos D, Leening MJG, Koudstaal PJ, Rizopoulos D, Ruiter R, Stricker BHC, Kavousi M, Ikram MA, Ikram MK. The association of innate and adaptive immunity, subclinical atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease in the rotterdam study: a prospective cohort study. PLOS Medicine. 2020;17:e1003115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fernández-Friera L, Fuster V, López-Melgar B, Oliva B, Sánchez-González J, Macías A, Pérez-Asenjo B, Zamudio D, Alonso-Farto JC, España S, Mendiguren J, Bueno H, García-Ruiz JM, Ibañez B, Fernández-Ortiz A, Sanz J. Vascular inflammation in subclinical atherosclerosis detected by hybrid PET/MRI. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019;73:1371–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gomez I, Ward B, Souilhol C, Recarti C, Ariaans M, Johnston J, Burnett A, Mahmoud M, Luong LA, West L, Long M, Parry S, Woods R, Hulston C, Benedikter B, Niespolo C, Bazaz R, Francis S, Kiss-Toth E, van Zandvoort M, Schober A, Hellewell P, Evans PC, Ridger V. Neutrophil microvesicles drive atherosclerosis by delivering miR-155 to atheroprone endothelium. Nature Communications. 2020;11:214. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14043-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hashimshony T, Wagner F, Sher N, Yanai I. CEL-Seq: single-cell RNA-Seq by multiplexed linear amplification. Cell Reports. 2012;2:666–673. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heidt T, Sager HB, Courties G, Dutta P, Iwamoto Y, Zaltsman A, von Zur Muhlen C, Bode C, Fricchione GL, Denninger J, Lin CP, Vinegoni C, Libby P, Swirski FK, Weissleder R, Nahrendorf M. Chronic variable stress activates hematopoietic stem cells. Nature Medicine. 2014;20:754–758. doi: 10.1038/nm.3589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Karigane D, Takubo K. Metabolic regulation of hematopoietic and leukemic stem/progenitor cells under homeostatic and stress conditions. International Journal of Hematology. 2017;106:18–26. doi: 10.1007/s12185-017-2261-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McAlpine CS, Kiss MG, Rattik S, He S, Vassalli A, Valet C, Anzai A, Chan CT, Mindur JE, Kahles F, Poller WC, Frodermann V, Fenn AM, Gregory AF, Halle L, Iwamoto Y, Hoyer FF, Binder CJ, Libby P, Tafti M, Scammell TE, Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK. Sleep modulates haematopoiesis and protects against atherosclerosis. Nature. 2019;566:383–387. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0948-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mitroulis I, Ruppova K, Wang B, Chen LS, Grzybek M, Grinenko T, Eugster A, Troullinaki M, Palladini A, Kourtzelis I, Chatzigeorgiou A, Schlitzer A, Beyer M, Joosten LAB, Isermann B, Lesche M, Petzold A, Simons K, Henry I, Dahl A, Schultze JL, Wielockx B, Zamboni N, Mirtschink P, Coskun Ü, Hajishengallis G, Netea MG, Chavakis T. Modulation of myelopoiesis progenitors is an integral component of trained immunity. Cell. 2018;172:147–161. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Moore KJ, Sheedy FJ, Fisher EA. Macrophages in atherosclerosis: a dynamic balance. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2013;13:709–721. doi: 10.1038/nri3520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nagareddy PR, Murphy AJ, Stirzaker RA, Hu Y, Yu S, Miller RG, Ramkhelawon B, Distel E, Westerterp M, Huang LS, Schmidt AM, Orchard TJ, Fisher EA, Tall AR, Goldberg IJ. Hyperglycemia promotes myelopoiesis and impairs the resolution of atherosclerosis. Cell Metabolism. 2013;17:695–708. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Netea MG, Domínguez-Andrés J, Barreiro LB, Chavakis T, Divangahi M, Fuchs E, Joosten LAB, van der Meer JWM, Mhlanga MM, Mulder WJM, Riksen NP, Schlitzer A, Schultze JL, Stabell Benn C, Sun JC, Xavier RJ, Latz E. Defining trained immunity and its role in health and disease. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2020;20:375–388. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0285-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nidorf SM, Fiolet ATL, Mosterd A, Eikelboom JW, Schut A, Opstal TSJ, The SHK, Xu X-F, Ireland MA, Lenderink T, Latchem D, Hoogslag P, Jerzewski A, Nierop P, Whelan A, Hendriks R, Swart H, Schaap J, Kuijper AFM, van Hessen MWJ, Saklani P, Tan I, Thompson AG, Morton A, Judkins C, Bax WA, Dirksen M, Alings M, Hankey GJ, Budgeon CA, Tijssen JGP, Cornel JH, Thompson PL. Colchicine in patients with chronic coronary disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;31:2021372. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Opstal TSJ, Hoogeveen RM, Fiolet ATL, Silvis MJM, The SHK, Bax WA, de Kleijn DPV, Mosterd A, Stroes ESG, Cornel JH. Colchicine attenuates inflammation beyond the inflammasome in chronic coronary artery disease: a LoDoCo2 proteomic substudy. Circulation. 2020;381:50560. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pen A, Yam Y, Chen L, Dennie C, McPherson R, Chow BJ. Discordance between framingham risk score and atherosclerotic plaque burden. European Heart Journal. 2013;34:1075–1082. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pirro M, Simental-Mendía LE, Bianconi V, Watts GF, Banach M, Sahebkar A. Effect of statin therapy on arterial wall inflammation based on 18F-FDG PET/CT: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis of interventional studies. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019;8:118. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, Fonseca F, Nicolau J, Koenig W, Anker SD, Kastelein JJP, Cornel JH, Pais P, Pella D, Genest J, Cifkova R, Lorenzatti A, Forster T, Kobalava Z, Vida-Simiti L, Flather M, Shimokawa H, Ogawa H, Dellborg M, Rossi PRF, Troquay RPT, Libby P, Glynn RJ, CANTOS Trial Group Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;377:1119–1131. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shirai T, Nazarewicz RR, Wallis BB, Yanes RE, Watanabe R, Hilhorst M, Tian L, Harrison DG, Giacomini JC, Assimes TL, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. The glycolytic enzyme PKM2 bridges metabolic and inflammatory dysfunction in coronary artery disease. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2016;213:337–354. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Silvestre-Roig C, Braster Q, Ortega-Gomez A, Soehnlein O. Neutrophils as regulators of cardiovascular inflammation. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2020;17:327–340. doi: 10.1038/s41569-019-0326-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Simmini S, Bialecka M, Huch M, Kester L, van de Wetering M, Sato T, Beck F, van Oudenaarden A, Clevers H, Deschamps J. Transformation of intestinal stem cells into gastric stem cells on loss of transcription factor Cdx2. Nature Communications. 2014;5:5728. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Takubo K, Goda N, Yamada W, Iriuchishima H, Ikeda E, Kubota Y, Shima H, Johnson RS, Hirao A, Suematsu M, Suda T. Regulation of the HIF-1alpha level is essential for hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7:391–402. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tardif JC, Kouz S, Waters DD, Bertrand OF, Diaz R, Maggioni AP, Pinto FJ, Ibrahim R, Gamra H, Kiwan GS, Berry C, López-Sendón J, Ostadal P, Koenig W, Angoulvant D, Grégoire JC, Lavoie MA, Dubé MP, Rhainds D, Provencher M, Blondeau L, Orfanos A, L'Allier PL, Guertin MC, Roubille F. Efficacy and safety of Low-Dose colchicine after myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. 2019;381:2497–2505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tarkin JM, Joshi FR, Rudd JH. PET imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2014;11:443–457. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ter Horst R, Jaeger M, Smeekens SP, Oosting M, Swertz MA, Li Y, Kumar V, Diavatopoulos DA, Jansen AFM, Lemmers H, Toenhake-Dijkstra H, van Herwaarden AE, Janssen M, van der Molen RG, Joosten I, Sweep F, Smit JW, Netea-Maier RT, Koenders M, Xavier RJ, van der Meer JWM, Dinarello CA, Pavelka N, Wijmenga C, Notebaart RA, Joosten LAB, Netea MG. Host and environmental factors influencing individual human cytokine responses. Cell. 2016;167:1111–1124. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tsou CL, Peters W, Si Y, Slaymaker S, Aslanian AM, Weisberg SP, Mack M, Charo IF. Critical roles for CCR2 and MCP-3 in monocyte mobilization from bone marrow and recruitment to inflammatory sites. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2007;117:902–909. doi: 10.1172/JCI29919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. van der Heijden CDCC, Groh L, Keating ST, Kaffa C, Noz MP, Kersten S, van Herwaarden AE, Hoischen A, Joosten LAB, Timmers HJLM, Netea MG, Riksen NP. Catecholamines induce trained immunity in monocytes in vitro and in vivo. Circulation Research. 2020;127:269–283. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. van der Valk FM, Kuijk C, Verweij SL, Stiekema LCA, Kaiser Y, Zeerleder S, Nahrendorf M, Voermans C, Stroes ESG. Increased haematopoietic activity in patients with atherosclerosis. European Heart Journal. 2016;15:425–432. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, Hosny A, Aucoin N, Narayan V, Beets-Tan RGH, Fillion-Robin JC, Pieper S, Aerts H. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Research. 2017;77:e104–e107. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. van Wijk DF, Sjouke B, Figueroa A, Emami H, van der Valk FM, MacNabb MH, Hemphill LC, Schulte DM, Koopman MG, Lobatto ME, Verberne HJ, Fayad ZA, Kastelein JJ, Mulder WJ, Hovingh GK, Tawakol A, Stroes ES. Nonpharmacological lipoprotein apheresis reduces arterial inflammation in familial hypercholesterolemia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;64:1418–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Weber C, Shantsila E, Hristov M, Caligiuri G, Guzik T, Heine GH, Hoefer IE, Monaco C, Peter K, Rainger E, Siegbahn A, Steffens S, Wojta J, Lip GY. Role and analysis of monocyte subsets in cardiovascular disease. joint consensus document of the european society of cardiology (ESC) Working groups "Atherosclerosis & Vascular Biology" and "Thrombosis". Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2016;116:626–637. doi: 10.1160/TH16-02-0091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology. 2012;16:284–287. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yvan-Charvet L, Pagler T, Gautier EL, Avagyan S, Siry RL, Han S, Welch CL, Wang N, Randolph GJ, Snoeck HW, Tall AR. ATP-binding cassette transporters and HDL suppress hematopoietic stem cell proliferation. Science. 2010;328:1689–1693. doi: 10.1126/science.1189731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ziegler-Heitbrock L, Ancuta P, Crowe S, Dalod M, Grau V, Hart DN, Leenen PJ, Liu YJ, MacPherson G, Randolph GJ, Scherberich J, Schmitz J, Shortman K, Sozzani S, Strobl H, Zembala M, Austyn JM, Lutz MB. Nomenclature of monocytes and dendritic cells in blood. Blood. 2010;116:e74–e80. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-258558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision letter

Editor: Noriaki Emoto1
Reviewed by: Roxane Tussiwand

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Acceptance summary:

In an in-depth analysis of the transcriptional changes occurring in bone marrow progenitors of patients affected by severe coronary artery disease, Noz et al. demonstrate an increase in vitro cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes of affected patients upon stimulation with innate ligands. Furthermore, RNA-seq of progenitor cells shows an enrichment in the expression of genes indicative of neutrophil and monocyte activation and differentiation. This study provides the first evidence for bone marrow myeloid progenitor cells are reprogrammed towards myeloid skewing and inflammatory activation in patients with severe coronary artery disease.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Reprogramming of bone marrow myeloid progenitor cells in patients with severe coronary atherosclerosis" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and a Senior Editor. The following individual involved in review of your submission has agreed to reveal their identity: Roxane Tussiwand (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers have discussed the reviews with one another and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this decision to help you prepare a revised submission.

We would like to draw your attention to changes in our revision policy that we have made in response to COVID-19 (https://elifesciences.org/articles/57162). Specifically, we are asking editors to accept without delay manuscripts, like yours, that they judge can stand as eLife papers without additional data, even if they feel that they would make the manuscript stronger. Thus the revisions requested below only address clarity and presentation.

Summary:

The study by Noz et al. is an in-depth analysis of the transcriptional changes occurring in the bone marrow progenitors of patients affected by severe coronary atherosclerosis. The study collects data from 13 patients with severe coronary atherosclerosis and 13 healthy volunteers. The authors observed an increase in vitro cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes of affected patients upon stimulation with innate ligands. Furthermore, RNA-seq of progenitor cells shows an enrichment in the expression of genes related to neutrophils and monocyte activation and differentiation.

This is an interesting and well-written paper supported by a large amount of data suggesting that BM derived myeloid progenitor cells are reprogrammed in human atherosclerosis. The study is well-conducted with appropriate statistical approaches suitable for current exploitative study.

Essential revisions:

1) The reviewers understand that the authors investigated "severe coronary atherosclerosis", not "severe coronary disease". However, the reviewers would like to confirm that the recruited patients were free of clinical symptoms related to coronary artery disease including angina.

2) If possible, a cytokine and chemokines array should be performed on the serum of patients. Are neutrophil or myeloid related cytokines and chemokines systemically enriched? i.e. FLT3L, G-CSF, GM-CSF… (the increase in circulating HSCs could reflect increased systemic mobilizing factors)

3) Please include a complete panel of the patient's and donor's PBMC (Table 2). It is important to understand if skewing is observed in the periphery. Trained immunity leads increased myelopoiesis besides increased responsiveness.

4) Before and after the in vitro stimulation include a flow panel on the main subsets. It may be relevant to understand that population skewing can partially explain the differential cytokine expression.

5) Similarly, what is the subset distribution in the BM samples?

6) For the metabolic analysis a subset distribution showed be included before and after cytokine stimulation in parallel to the Seahorse analysis. Moreover, rather than showing an individual data point a time course should be performed using the different inhibitors for the evaluation of spare capacity and glycolytic reserve as it is normally done (OCR treatment with Oligomycin, FCCP and Rotenone/Antimycin; for ECAR Glucose, oligomycin and 2DG).

eLife. 2020 Nov 10;9:e60939. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60939.sa2

Author response


Essential revisions:

1) The reviewers understand that the authors investigated "severe coronary atherosclerosis", not "severe coronary disease". However, the reviewers would like to confirm that the recruited patients were free of clinical symptoms related to coronary artery disease including angina.

We apologize to the reviewers for not being clear on this point: the patients were all admitted to the cardiac emergency ward for evaluation of chest pain and were subsequently diagnosed with severe coronary atherosclerosis. So these patients suffer from symptomatic coronary atherosclerosis. In the revised version, we have stated this in the Materials and methods section and in the Abstract. In addition, we changed the title into ‘reprogramming of bone marrow myeloid progenitor cells in patients with coronary artery disease’, indicating the symptomatic nature of the atherosclerotic lesions.

2) If possible, a cytokine and chemokines array should be performed on the serum of patients. Are neutrophil or myeloid related cytokines and chemokines systemically enriched? i.e. FLT3L, G-CSF, GM-CSF… (the increase in circulating HSCs could reflect increased systemic mobilizing factors)

We would like to thank the reviewer for this interesting suggestions. We have now performed the additional ELISA’s after purchasing the ELISA kits. For FLT3L we observed a trend towards a higher circulating concentration in the CAD patients compared to the controls, albeit not statistically significant (see Author response image 1; P=0.12).

Author response image 1.

Author response image 1.

For the G-CSF and GM-CSF unfortunately all samples except one were below the limit of detection and we cannot draw any conclusions from this. We have chosen not to include these data in the manuscript. However, if the Editor would like them to be incorporated, we will do so.

3) Please include a complete panel of the patient's and donor's PBMC (Table 2). It is important to understand if skewing is observed in the periphery. Trained immunity leads increased myelopoiesis besides increased responsiveness.

All results of the leukocyte differentiation with the Sysmex analyser are shown in Table 2. The results of the flow cytometry are mentioned in the Table 2 for the monocytes and in Figure 2 for the circulating progenitor cells. We do not have any additional data. Table 2 clearly showed that there is no skewing in the circulating PBMC’s. This is consistent with the findings after BCG-induced trained immunity in vivo that we recently published (Cirovic et al., 2020): 90 days after BCG vaccination, circulating monocytes clearly showed a hyperresponsive trained phenotype, but Differential blood count analysis did not reveal significant differences between the BCG-vaccinated and BCG-naive group within neutrophils, total lymphocytes or monocyte counts. In addition, there was no difference within the PBMC fraction in percentages of classical/intermediate/non-classical monocytes, and DC’s.

4) Before and after the in vitro stimulation include a flow panel on the main subsets. It may be relevant to understand that population skewing can partially explain the differential cytokine expression.

The ex vivo stimulation experiments have been performed with isolated PBMCs from the patients and controls. As reported in Table 2, there are no differences in leukocyte differentiation and subsets in whole blood, and therefore the higher cytokine production capacity that we observed is not due the differential skewing. As an additional confirmation that there were no large differences after PBMC isolation, we also performed Sysmex analysis on the PBMC’s, which are shown in Table 3 and confirm no differences between patients and controls. We did not repeat the flow cytometry on the PBMC fractions. Also, we did not perform flow cytometry after the 24 hours of ex vivo stimulation, since the PBMCs are terminally differentiated cells and hence no skewing is to be expected, and the monocytes will be differentiated into macrophages. We hope that this explanation is helpful for the reviewer.

5) Similarly, what is the subset distribution in the BM samples?

For the bone marrow, we performed flow cytometry to identify the various progenitor cell types (HSC, MPP, CLP, CMP, GMP, MEP and pre-monocytes), and the results are shown in Figure 2.

We think that the reviewers now refers to the monocyte subset distribution of the monocytes in the bone marrow and we have added this information in the revised version “Within bone marrow, no difference in the percentage of monocytes (3.3 [3.1-4.4] % in patients versus 3.4 [3.0-4.6] in controls), and monocyte subpopulations, i.e. classical (87 [82-88] % versus 82 [79-89]), intermediate (7.5 [7.1-10.8] % versus 9.3 [6.1-11.5]) and non-classical monocytes (5.1 [4.2-8.1] % versus 8.1 [3.6-11.4]), was observed.”

6) For the metabolic analysis a subset distribution showed be included before and after cytokine stimulation in parallel to the Seahorse analysis. Moreover, rather than showing an individual data point a time course should be performed using the different inhibitors for the evaluation of spare capacity and glycolytic reserve as it is normally done (OCR treatment with Oligomycin, FCCP and Rotenone/Antimycin; for ECAR Glucose, oligomycin and 2DG).

With regard to the first request, we would like to stress that the subset distribution before the Seahorse analysis can be derived from Table 2: this is the baseline leukocyte differentiation in the blood of the patients and controls. We did not perform flow cytometry after the Seahorse measurements.

With regard to the second request: we have now added the time-plots of the Seahorse data with the effect of the different inhibitors indicated (see Figure 4).

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Noz M, Bekkering S, Riksen NP, Netea MG. 2020. Bone marrow progenitor cell populations of patients with severe coronary artery disease. ArrayExpress. E-MTAB-9399

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 6—source data 1. Contains source data for Figure 6B, and Figure 6—figure supplements 1B, 2, 3.

    Table of differential expressed genes between patients with CAD and individualswithout atherosclerosis, controlled for age, in a combined/separated analysis of HSCs, MPPs, and GMPs population.

    elife-60939-fig6-data1.xlsx (148.9KB, xlsx)
    Figure 6—source data 2. Contains source data for Figure 6C.

    Table of enrichment analysis of gene ontology terms and involved DE genes of HSCs, MPPs, and GMPs population.

    Supplementary file 1. Gating strategy of circulating immune cells (related to Table 2).

    Monocytes were selected based on CD45+ HLA-DR+ and monocyte scatter properties, after exclusion of dead cells and doublets. Then CD3+ lymphocytes and CD56+ NK-cells were excluded, and monocyte subsets were identified in the CD14/CD16 plot as the percentage of gated. CD11b and CCR2 expression was determined on the monocyte population.

    elife-60939-supp1.pdf (5.3MB, pdf)
    Transparent reporting form

    Data Availability Statement

    RNA-seq data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress database at EMBL-EBI (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accession number E-MTAB-9399.

    The following dataset was generated:

    Noz M, Bekkering S, Riksen NP, Netea MG. 2020. Bone marrow progenitor cell populations of patients with severe coronary artery disease. ArrayExpress. E-MTAB-9399


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES