Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2020 Nov 11;8:e10034. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10034

The complete mitochondrial genome of Gyps coprotheres (Aves, Accipitridae, Accipitriformes): phylogenetic analysis of mitogenome among raptors

Emmanuel Oluwasegun Adawaren 1,, Morne Du Plessis 2, Essa Suleman 3,6, Duodane Kindler 3, Almero O Oosthuizen 2, Lillian Mukandiwa 4, Vinny Naidoo 5
Editor: Joseph Gillespie
PMCID: PMC7666543  PMID: 33240589

Abstract

Three species of Old World vultures on the Asian peninsula are slowly recovering from the lethal consequences of diclofenac. At present the reason for species sensitivity to diclofenac is unknown. Furthermore, it has since been demonstrated that other Old World vultures like the Cape (Gyps coprotheres; CGV) and griffon (G. fulvus) vultures are also susceptible to diclofenac toxicity. Oddly, the New World Turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) and pied crow (Corvus albus) are not susceptible to diclofenac toxicity. As a result of the latter, we postulate an evolutionary link to toxicity. As a first step in understanding the susceptibility to diclofenac toxicity, we use the CGV as a model species for phylogenetic evaluations, by comparing the relatedness of various raptor species known to be susceptible, non-susceptible and suspected by their relationship to the Cape vulture mitogenome. This was achieved by next generation sequencing and assembly. The Cape vulture mitogenome had a genome size of 16,908 bp. The mitogenome phylogenetic analysis indicated a close evolutionary relationship between Old World vultures and other members of the Accipitridae as indicated by bootstrap value of 100% on the phylogenetic trees. Based on this, we postulate that the other species could also be sensitive to the toxic effects of diclofenac. This warrants further investigations.

Keywords: Cape vulture, Accipitridae, Phylogeny, Susceptibility, Diclofenac toxicity, Raptors, Mitochondrial, Genome, Accipitriformes, Gyps coprotheres

Introduction

Generally, vultures may be classified as Old or New World vultures based on the apparent convergent evolutionary scavenging feeding habit (Seibold & Helbig, 1995). However, in reality, they are a morphologically and evolutionary diverse group of birds (Seibold & Helbig, 1995; Wink, 1995; Johnson et al., 2016). Old World vultures are descendants of the Accipitridae family, which also comprise eagles, hawks, kites and buzzards (Wink, 1995; Lerner & Mindell, 2005; Clements et al., 2019). Old and New World vultures belong to two different families, Accipitridae and Cathartidae, respectively (Wink, 1995; Clements et al., 2019). According to Clements’ taxonomic classification, Accipitridae, which belongs to the order Accipitriformes, is one of the largest non-passerine families comprising 252 species (227 are monophyletic while 25 are polyphyletic) (Clements et al., 2019). The order Accipitriformes also includes the families Sagittariidae, Pandionidae and Cathartidae, although the latter is now classified under the order Cathartiformes (Wink, 1995; Clements et al., 2019).

Raptors are primarily predator birds that hunt and kill their prey but also include carrion feeders. These include members of the Accipitridae, Falconidae, Cathartidae, Strigidae and Tytonidae families (Clements et al., 2019). Raptors are valuable indicators of habitat quality based on their ecological sensitivity as predators and scavengers (Lerner & Mindell, 2005). However, vultures belonging to the Accipitriformes order are currently facing devastating drops in their population numbers from an array of problems ranging from loss of their natural habitat, collision with high-tension electric cables and wind turbines, intentional poisoning of animal carcasses by poachers of endangered wildlife species and accidental ingestion of carcasses contaminated with pharmaceuticals (Ogada et al., 2016; Naidoo et al., 2018; Adawaren et al., 2018). One notable incident was the near complete extinction of three Gyps vulture species the white-rumped vulture (Gyps bengalenesis), the Indian vulture (G. indicus) and the slender-billed vulture (G. tenuirostris) in India, Nepal and Pakistan from the consumption of carcasses of animals dosed with diclofenac (Oaks et al., 2004; Swan et al., 2006b; Naidoo et al., 2009; Adawaren et al., 2018). At present, it is estimated that the drug caused the deaths of over 10 million vultures in the region (Naidoo et al., 2018). Furthermore, diclofenac has been implicated as the cause of death of a steppe eagle (Aquila nipalensis), a member of the Accipitridae family with classical sign of toxicity seen in vultures (Sharma et al., 2014). This incidence raises concern on the vulnerability of the Accipitriformes and other raptors to diclofenac toxicity. Complications due to the toxic consequences of diclofenac have also been reported in the Cape vulture (Swan et al., 2006b; Naidoo et al., 2009; Naidoo et al., 2010; Naidoo et al., 2018; Adawaren et al., 2018).

Diclofenac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) mostly understood for its analgesic, anti-inflammatory and an antipyretic characteristic, is used for the treatment of inflammatory disorders in humans and animals. The drug was, however, sufficient to cause death within 48 h of exposure in vultures that had fed on the carcasses in which the drug was present, with signs of renal failure associated with visceral and articular gout being evident on necropsy (Oaks et al., 2004; Swan et al., 2006b; Naidoo & Swan, 2009). While the general mechanism of action of the NSAIDs and their toxicity in mammals is well characterized, the same cannot be said for vultures. Despite the exact cellular mechanism underlying toxicity remaining unknown, the clinical progression of toxicity is well established (Swan et al., 2006b; Naidoo et al., 2009). Vultures generally show signs of depression as early as 24 h after exposure (depression characterized by head drooping, reluctance to move, open wings, decreased appetite, loss of aggression, etc.). At approximately 48 h post exposure, the affected animals usually died, with post-mortem showing characteristic gross lesions of visceral and articular gout and histological lesions of renal tubular necrosis, especially the proximal convoluted tubules (PCT) of the kidney and hepatocytes of the liver (Swan et al., 2006b; Naidoo et al., 2009). At the physiological level, the drug is associated with massive elevation in plasma uric acid amount, acidaemia, hyperkalaemia and increases in plasma liver enzyme activity. In terms of the temporal relationship, the first signs of depression correspond to the first elevation in uric acid amount indicative of early kidney damage, followed by increase in plasma liver enzyme activities indicative of hepatic necrosis, and, lastly, death associated with hyperkalaemia and acidosis. While speculative, the increase in potassium is purported to induce cardiac failure and death (Naidoo et al., 2007).

Following the discovery of diclofenac as the cause for these vulture deaths, research has shown that these Old World bird species are also vulnerable to other NSAIDs toxicity, with the notable exception being meloxicam thus far (Swan et al., 2006a; Naidoo et al., 2010; Adawaren et al., 2018). The scenario is, however, different with the New World vultures. In a study in which the Turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) was exposed to diclofenac 25 mg/kg, a concentration that was 100 times above the median lethal dose (0.1–0.2 mg/kg) in Old World vultures, no overt toxicity was evident. Furthermore, the diclofenac could hardly be detected in the tissue after necropsy, with the concurrent pharmacokinetics study demonstrating a low plasma half-life of elimination of 6 h, in comparison to 12–16 h observed in Cape vultures (Rattner et al., 2008; Naidoo et al., 2009). The high sensitivity of the Old World vultures also contrasts with other bird species whereby high doses in the region of 10 mg/kg was needed to induce toxicity in chickens (Gallus gallus), with a corresponding plasma half-life elimination predicted within the range of 14 h in domestic chicken. The Pied crow (Corvus albus) was less sensitive with no signs of toxicity at 10 mg/kg and a plasma half-life of 2.5 h (Naidoo et al., 2007; Naidoo et al., 2010).

Due to inter-species sensitivity and the apparent relationship between the plasma half-life of elimination, it was suggested that the lethal effect of the NSAIDs in avian species is associated with their ability to metabolise the drug in species-specific manner. From work in other species, this limitations tends to be an evolutionary link in the Cytochrome P450 enzyme network, which is responsible for xenobiotic metabolism. Naidoo et al. (2010) postulated that toxicity in vultures was due to zero-order metabolism related to a possible evolutionary pharmacogenetic defect in the CYP2C family resulting in non-expression of the enzyme system, based on similar effects in human with metabolic defects in the same enzyme family (Naidoo et al., 2010). The CYP enzyme of the vulture has yet to be identified. As CYP enzymes share an evolutionary link, we speculate that species susceptible to toxicity are closely related, which might be visualized using a phylogeny derived from complete mitogenomes (Bort et al., 1999; Goodman and Gilman, 2011; Watanabe et al., 2013; Yang, Ye & Huang, 2016).

Materials and Methods

Materials

Sodium pentobarbital (Euthapent®), ZR Genomic DNA Isolation kit (Zymo Research), BigDye Terminator sequencer Cycle Sequencing Kit, oligonucleotide primers (Integrated DNA Technologies), liquid nitrogen (Afrox), 2 ml cyrotubes (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen) were used in the study. The equipment used for the study were −80 °C refrigerator, NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), microcentrifuge (Eppendorf), ION Torrent S5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) Next Generation Sequencer, 540 ION chip (Thermo Fisher Scientific), ABI 3130 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems) and SimpliAmp Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Methods

Publicly available sequence information

The complete mitochondrial genomes (mtDNA) of the bird species used for these studies were obtained from GenBank. The species belonged to six families of raptors, namely, Accipitridae, Pandionidae, Sagittariidae, Cathartidae, Falconidae and Strigidae respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. Mitogenome accession number and Diclofenac Toxicity Status of Bird Species investigated in this study as classified by Clements et al. (2019).

(A) Bird species names, (B) Family name, (C) Accession number, (D) Genera Diclofenac toxicity status, (E) References.

Species Family Accession number
Accipiter gentilis (Northern Goshawk) Accipitridae NC_011818
Accipiter nisus (Eurasian Sparrowhawk) Accipitridae NC_025580
Accipiter soloensis (Chinese Sparrowhawk) Accipitridae KJ680303
Accipiter virgatus (Besra) Accipitridae NC_026082
Aegypius monachus (Cinereous Vulture) Accipitridae KF682364.1
Aquila chrysaetos (Golden Eagle) Accipitridae NC_024087
Aquila fasciata (Bonelli’s Eagle) Accipitridae KP329567
Aquila heliacal (Eastern imperial eagle) Accipitridae NC_035806
Buteo buteo (Common Buzzard) Accipitridae NC_003128
Buteo buteo burmanicus (Himalayan) Accipitridae KM364882
Buteo fasciatus (Bonelli’s eagle) Accipitridae NC_029188
Buteo hemilasius (Upland Buzzard) Accipitridae NC_029377.1
Buteo lagopus (Rough-legged Hawk) Accipitridae KP337337
Butastur indicus (Grey-faced Buzzard) Accipitridae NC_032362
Butastur liventer (Rufous-wing Buzzard) Accipitridae AB830617
Cathartes aura (Turkey Vulture) Cathartidae NC_007628
circus cyaneus (Northern Harrier) Accipitridae KX925606
circus melanoleucos (Pied Harrier) Accipitridae NC_035801
Gyps coprotheres (Cape vulture) Accipitridae MF683387
Gyps fulvus (Griffon vulture) Accipitridae NC_036050
Gyps himalayensis (Himalayan vulture) Accipitridae KY594709.1
Nisaetus alboniger (Blyth’s Hawk-Eagle) Accipitridae NC_007599
Nisaetus nipalensis (Mountain Hawk-Eagle) Accipitridae NC 007598.1
Spilornis cheela (Crested Serpent-Eagle) Accipitridae NC_015887
Sagittarius serpentarius (Secretary-bird) Sagittariidae NC_023788
Pandion haliaetus (Osprey) Pandionidae NC_008550
Strix leptogrammica (Brown wood owl) Strigidae KC953095.1
Falco columbarius (Merlin) Falconidae KM264304.1
Falco tinnunculus (Common Kestrel) Falconidae EU196361.1
Falco sparverius (American kestrel) Falconidae DQ780880.1
Falco naumanni (Lesser Kestrel) Falconidae KM251414.1
Falco peregrinus (Barbary falcon) Falconidae JQ282801.1
Falco cherry (Cherry Falcon) Falconidae KP337902.1
Falco rusticolus (Gyrfalcon) Falconidae KT989235.1

Collection of skin samples and genomic DNA extraction

This study was authorized by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Pretoria, South Africa, with project numbers V093-15 and V097-17 in 2015 to 2017. Samples were opportunistically collected immediately after the euthanasia of an individual Cape vulture (Gyps coprotheres) with intravenous injection of pentobarbitone for a non-treatable physical injury. Skin samples were stored in sterile cryotubes and placed immediately into liquid nitrogen (−196 °C) for 10 min to snap-freeze the samples, which were then transferred into the −80 °C refrigerator until genomic DNA extraction. The frozen Cape vulture skin samples were allowed to melt at ambient temperature and approximately 25 mg of the thawed tissue was excised for DNA extraction using the ZR Genomic DNA Isolation kit (Zymo Research) according to manual instructions. The quality of the extracted sample was examined using a NanoDrop reader.

Genome sequencing

Genome sequencing was performed at the Uppsala Genome Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, on the ION S5 XL platform (Thermo Fisher. 2015). The genome sequencing was conducted according to manual instruction. The run was performed on 200 bp read length chemistry on an ION-540 chip

Mitogenome assembly and annotation

The NGS sequence quality was evaluated using the FastQC software (Bioinformatics, 2011). Based on the quality assessment, the data was trimmed using the Trimmomatic program (Bolger, Lohse & Usadel, 2014) and the total dataset was down sampled to 10 million reads. Thereafter, reads with lengths exceeding 100 bp were selected for subsequent assembly. The de-novo assembly was conducted using the CLC Genomic Workbench version 6.0 software on the default settings. The subsequent assemblies were used to create a database against which a representative mitochondrial genome was queried. The contig with significant similarity to the query across its entire length was then submitted to the MITOS server (Bernt et al., 2013) in order to perform annotation of the mitochondrial genome.

Mitogenome structure, organization and characterization of Gyps coprotheres

The Cape vulture mitogenome order, organization and characterization were described as presented in Fig. 1 and Table 2. Gene overlap and intergenic-space sequences were determined manually. The putative origin of light-strand replication (OL) and control region were identified by comparison with the homologous sequences of other bird species from the Accipitriformes order.

Figure 1. Complete mitochondrial genome organization and mitogene arrangement of Gyps coprotheres.

Figure 1

Genes found on the coding strand are indicated outside the mitochondrial genome map, while the mitogenes coded on the complementary strand are indicated inside the map.

Table 2. Characteristics of the mitochondrial genome of Gyps coprotheres.

(A) Mitogene names, (B) mitogene position, (C) Mitogene nucleotide size, (D) Mitogene start and stop codon, (E) Mitogene intergenic overlap, (F) Mitogene strand, (G) Mitogene A + T% nucleotide composition.

Gene Position Size Condon Intergenic overlap Strand Nucleotide composition
From To Nucleotide Start Stop A + T%
tRNA-Phe 1 70 70 0 H 47.2
12S rRNA 70 1037 968 0 H 51.2
tRNA-Val 1037 1108 72 0 H 55.6
16S rRNA 1109 2709 1,601 1 H 54
tRNA-Leu 2710 2783 74 1 H 47.3
ND1 2822 3800 978 ATG AGG 39 H 53.9
tRNA-Ile 3769 3840 72 −31 H 55.5
tRNA-Gln 3854 3924 71 14 L 67.6
tRNA-Met 3924 3992 69 0 H 49.3
ND2 3993 5039 1,047 ATG TAG 1 H 52.6
tRNA-Trp 5038 5109 72 −1 H 62.5
tRNA-Ala 5111 5179 69 2 L 56.5
tRNA-Asn 5182 5254 73 3 L 50.7
tRNA-Cys 5257 5323 67 3 L 49.3
tRNA-Tyr 5324 5393 70 1 L 55.7
COX1 5395 6945 1,551 GTG AGG 2 H 52.8
tRNA-Ser 6937 7010 74 −8 L 52.7
tRNA-Asp 7015 7083 69 5 H 59.4
COXII 7086 7769 684 ATG TAA 3 H 52.8
tRNA-Lys 7771 7841 71 2 H 59.1
ATP8 7843 8010 168 ATG TAA 2 H 55.6
ATP6 8001 8684 684 ATG TAA −9 H 54.8
COXIII 8684 9467 784 ATG T 0 H 52.9
tRNA-Gly 9468 9536 69 1 H 66.6
ND3 9537 9710 351 ATT TAA 1 H 55.1
tRNA-Arg 9893 9961 69 183 H 59.4
ND4L 9963 10259 297 ATG TAA 2 H 53.9
ND4 10253 11630 1,378 ATG T −6 H 51.3
tRNA-His 11631 11700 70 1 H 65.7
tRNA-Ser 11702 11766 65 2 H 55.4
tRNA-Leu 11767 11837 71 1 H 62.0
ND5 11847 13652 1,806 ATA TAA 10 H 55.2
Cytb 13665 14807 1,143 ATG TAA 13 H 52.3
tRNA-Thr 14810 14877 68 3 H 64.8
tRNA-Pro 16083 16152 70 1206 L 61.4
ND6 16174 16692 519 ATG TAG 22 H 50.3
tRNA-Glu 16693 16763 71 1 L 62.0
D-loop 14878 16082 4 −1885 H 58.6
Unknown Region 16764 16908 145 682 H 62.7

Phylogenetics

The mitogenome phylogeny was inferred using maximum likelihood analysis model in MEGA X between bird species included in this study (Hall, 2013). The raptor species included in the phylogenetic analysis belong to the Accipitridae, Falconidae, Strigidae and Cathartidae families while Strix leptogrammica was used as an outgroup (Fig. 2). To determine the evolutionary relationship among the raptor bird species, each bird species complete mitogenome was analysed using the maximum likelihood method in MEGA X. The model test feature in MEGAX was used to evaluate the best-fit model of evolution, of which GTR + G + I was determined to be the best for constructing the phylogenetic tree. The preference model GTR + G + I was derived using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis (MEGA) software by conducting DNA/Protein models analysis to determine the Disparity Index Test Pattern of heterogeneity of the aligned nucleotide sequences used for the construction of a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree. This model was implemented in MEGAX to construct phylogenetic trees using the maximum likelihood algorithm by performing 1000 bootstrap replicates according to the protocol described by Hall (2013).

Figure 2. Phylogenetic Analysis Result using complete mitogenome.

Figure 2

Results of Phylogenetic analyses using maximum likelihood (ML) analysis indicated evolutionary relationships among 33 raptor species based on complete mitogenome sequences. Strix leptogrammica was used as outgroup. Bootstrap support values for ML analyses are indicated on the nodes. The solid border rectangle indicates a close phylogenetic relationship between Old World vultures, Hawk and Eagles confirmed with high bootstrap values with greater chances of shared susceptibility based on their close evolutionary relationship. While distantly related raptor bird species are less likely to succumb to diclofenac toxicity as reported for Turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) (Rattner et al., 2008).

Results

Mitogenome structure, organization and characterization of Gyps coprotheres

The Cape vulture mitogenome is a 16,908 bp circular DNA molecule with 13 protein coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA (tRNA), 2 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and a non-coding region known as the D-loop (GenBank accession no. MF683387; Fig. 1, Table 2). The most used start codon is ATG with 76.92% frequency while ATA, GTG and ATT were alternate initiation codons. On the other hand, TAA was the most used termination code with 53.85% frequency, while AGG and TAG served as alternate stop codons. Furthermore, NAD4 and COX3 do not have stop codons, but had T as their last nucleotide (Table 2). The architecture of the Cape vulture mtDNA was similar to those of the raptor bird species included in this study (Jiang et al., 2019).

Phylogenetic analyses

For this study, the evolutionary relationships among the bird species were investigated using phylogenetic analysis of the complete mitogenome among all the raptor species whose complete mitochondrial genome are available in GenBank. The choice of the mitogenomes as surrogates to investigate evolutionary relationships was because the mitogenome is composed of unique DNA sequences with evolutionary characteristic among animal species (Jiang et al., 2015; Jiang et al., 2019).

Discussion

The phylogenetic trees inferred from the complete mitogenome sequences among the raptor bird species included in this study indicated a monophyletic relationship among the Accipitridae. These monophyletic relationships were presented as clusters of Buteo + Butastur, Accipiter + Circus Gyps + Aegypius + Spilornis and Nisaetus + Aquila clades, respectively, with 100% bootstrap values (Fig. 2). Also the tree indicates that the Gyps species are closely related to Aegypius followed by Spilornis, Nisaetus, and Aquila genera respectively. Furthermore, the Pandion genus had close relationship to the Accipitridae followed by Sagittarius, Cathartes and the Falco genera, respectively (Johnson et al., 2016). In addition, the result showed a monophyletic relationship among falcons, which are closely related to Accipitridae compared to owls. The hierofalcons (Falco cherrug and Falco rusticolus) and Falco peregrinus cluster together into one clade with 100% bootstrap support values (Fig. 2). Furthermore, Falco tinnunculus and Falco naumanni had a monophyletic relationship with 100% bootstrap value, while Falco columbarius and Falco sparverius were outgroups. This study further confirmed the monophyletic relationship existing among falcons (Helbig et al., 1994; Wink et al., 2004; Nittinger et al., 2005; Doyle et al., 2018).

Earlier pharmacokinetics studies of NSAIDs in Old World vultures and other bird species indicated that there is a species-specific relationship associated to NSAIDs toxicity among bird species (Swan et al., 2006b; Rattner et al., 2008; Naidoo et al., 2009; Naidoo et al., 2010; Naidoo et al., 2011; Naidoo et al., 2018). In addition, the detrimental consequences of diclofenac have also been reported in the steppe eagle, a member of the Aquila genus (Sharma et al., 2014).

The phylogenetic analysis results (Fig. 2) clustered the Old World vultures (Gyps and Aegypius genera), hawks (Nisaetus genus) and eagles (Spilornis and Aquila genera) into the same clade. Considering the susceptibility of Old World vulture and eagle (Aquila nipalensis) species to diclofenac toxicity, it is possible that these closely-related bird species could also be sensitive to diclofenac toxicity (Fig. 2). The hawk and eagle families are of more particular concern than the other members of Accipitridae. However hawks and eagles may also be somewhat more protected as a result of their feeding habits which solely rely on hunting and less commonly on carrion feeding as opposed to the Old World vultures which are purely carrion feeders i.e., the opportunity to be exposed to medicated carrions is higher for the vultures. Thus, it would be important to ascertain these species sensitivity as already undertaken in the pied crow and Turkey vultures. Based on this premise, the results also tend to suggest that falcons, owls, harries, bustards, buzzards, kestrels and hawks would be less likely susceptible to diclofenac, since they are an out grouping as seen with the Turkey vulture which is resistant to diclofenac at a dose that is 100 times the lethal dose seen in Old World vultures.

The possible reason for a shared susceptibility among Accipitridae may be explained by evolutionary changes in the cytochrome P450 (CYP) group of enzymes. These enzymes are important in the detoxification of environmental pollutants and xenobiotics (Bort et al., 1999; Goodman and Gilman, 2011; Watanabe et al., 2013). It thus stands to reason that, with the mitogenome indicating species similarity, these species would evolve under similar environmental conditions and thus develop similar CYP enzyme capacity. This was demonstrated with the cholinesterase enzyme system in which the concentrations in herbivores is naturally higher than carnivores, due to plants having higher concentrations of natural acetyl choline like substances in comparison to animals (Ruiz-Garcia et al., 2008). As a result, the evolutionary adaption of higher enzyme concentration of these enzyme results in herbivores being less susceptible to organophosphorus toxicity (Ruiz-Garcia et al., 2008).

Evolutionary variations in the CYP450 enzymes between diclofenac resistant bird species (Turkey vulture, pied crow, chicken) and susceptible Old World vultures can better explain species-specific toxicity observed among avian. It is therefore imperative to identify members of the CYP450 group of genes in birds to fully elucidate the reason behind resistance and susceptibility to NSAIDs.

Conclusion

The architecture of the Cape vulture mitogenome was similar to the raptor bird species included in this study. The mitogenome phylogenetic analyses suggest the possibility of sensitivity to diclofenac toxicity among hawks and eagles.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Genomic sequences of Gyps coprotheres mitochondrial genome.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10034/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Phylogenetic Analysis Result using COX 1 Mitogene.

Results of Phylogenetic analyses using maximum likelihood (ML) analysis indicated evolutionary relationships among 32 raptor species based on COXI sequences. Strix leptogrammica was used as outgroup. Bootstrap support values for ML analyses are indicated on the nodes. The solid border rectangle indicates a close phylogenetic relationship between old world vultures and eagles confirmed with high bootstrap values with greater chances of shared susceptibility based on their close evolutionary relationship. While distantly related raptor bird species included within the broken border rectangle are less likely to succumb to diclofenac toxicity as reported for turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) (Rattner et al., 2008).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10034/supp-2

Acknowledgments

Kerri Wolter of VulPro is thanked for making the vulture tissue available.

Funding Statement

Sequencing was sponsored by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Mr Wayne Barnes). Emmanuel Adawaren was on a bursary sponsored by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (Grant no. 87772). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Emmanuel Oluwasegun Adawaren conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Morne Du Plessis and Lillian Mukandiwa analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Essa Suleman and Vinny Naidoo analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.

Duodane Kindler performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Almero O. Oosthuizen analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The bird species used during this study was authorised by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Pretoria, South Africa (#V093-15 and #V097-17).

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The data is available at GenBank: MF683387.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The data is available at GenBank: PRJNA389655.

References

  • Adawaren et al. (2018).Adawaren EO, Mukandiwa L, Njoya EM, Bekker L, Duncan N, Naidoo V. The use of liver slices from the Cape vulture (Gyps coprotheres) to better understand the role of liver toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in vultures. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2018;62:147–155. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernt et al. (2013).Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2013;69:313–319. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bioinformatics (2011).Bioinformatics, B . FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Institute; Cambridge: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Bolger, Lohse & Usadel (2014).Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bort et al. (1999).Bort R, Macé K, Boobis A, Gómez-Lechón M, Pfeifer A, Castell J. Hepatic metabolism of diclofenac: role of human CYP in the minor oxidative pathways. Biochemical Pharmacology. 1999;58:787–796. doi: 10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00167-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clements et al. (2019).Clements JF, Schulenberg TS, Iliff MJ, Roberson D, Fredericks TA, Sullivan BL, Wood CL. The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: Volume 3, [Online] 2019. http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/
  • Doyle et al. (2018).Doyle JM, Bell DA, Bloom PH, Emmons G, Fesnock A, Katzner TE, LaPre L, Leonard K, SanMiguel P, Westerman R, DeWoody JA. New insights into the phylogenetics and population structure of the prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus) BMC Genomics. 2018;19:233. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4615-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Goodman and Gilman (2011).Goodman and Gilman . The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 12th Edition Macmillan Press, Macmillan Administration; Houndmills, Basingstroke, Hampshire RG21, 2XS: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall (2013).Hall BG. Building phylogenetic trees from molecular data with MEGA. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2013;30:1229–1235. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Helbig et al. (1994).Helbig AJ, Seibold I, Bednarek W, Gaucher P, Ristow D, Scharlau W, Schmidl D, Wink M. Phylogenetic relationships among Falcon species (genus Falco) according to DNA sequence variation of the cytochrome b gene. In: Meyburg B-U, Chancellor RC, editors. Raptor conservation today. World Working Group Birds of Prey and Pica Press; Berlin: 1994. pp. 593–599. [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang et al. (2015).Jiang L, Chen J, Wang P, Ren Q, Yuan J, Qian C, Hua X, Guo Z, Zhang L, Yang J. The mitochondrial genomes of Aquila fasciata and Buteo lagopus (Aves, Accipitriformes): sequence, structure and phylogenetic analyses. PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0136297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang et al. (2019).Jiang L, Peng L, Tang M, You Z, Zhang M, West A, Ruan Q, Chen W, Merilä J. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the Himalayan Griffon, Gyps himalayensis (Accipitriformes: Accipitridae): sequence, structure, and phylogenetic analyses. Ecology and Evolution. 2019;9:8813–8828. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson et al. (2016).Johnson JA, Brown JW, Fuchs J, Mindell DP. Multi-locus phylogenetic inference among New World Vultures (Aves: Cathartidae) Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2016;105:193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lerner & Mindell (2005).Lerner HR, Mindell DP. Phylogeny of eagles, Old World vultures, and other Accipitridae based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2005;37:327–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naidoo et al. (2007).Naidoo V, Duncan N, Bekker L, Swan G. Validating the domestic fowl as a model to investigate the pathophysiology of diclofenac in Gyps vultures. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2007;24:260–266. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2007.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naidoo et al. (2011).Naidoo V, Mompati KF, Duncan N, Taggart MA. The pied crow (Corvus albus) is insensitive to diclofenac at concentrations present in carrion. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. 2011;47:936–944. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-47.4.936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naidoo & Swan (2009).Naidoo V, Swan GE. Diclofenac toxicity in Gyps vulture is associated with decreased uric acid excretion and not renal portal vasoconstriction. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C. 2009;149:269–274. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2008.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naidoo et al. (2018).Naidoo V, Taggart M, Duncan N, Wolter K, Chipangura J, Green R, Galligan T. The use of toxicokinetics and exposure studies to show that carprofen in cattle tissue could lead to secondary toxicity and death in wild vultures. Chemosphere. 2018;190:80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naidoo et al. (2010).Naidoo V, Venter L, Wolter K, Taggart M, Cuthbert R. The toxicokinetics of ketoprofen in Gyps coprotheres: toxicity due to zero-order metabolism. Archives of Toxicology. 2010;84(10):761–766. doi: 10.1007/s00204-010-0521-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naidoo et al. (2009).Naidoo V, Wolter K, Cuthbert R, Duncan N. Veterinary diclofenac threatens Africa’s endangered vulture species. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2009;53(3):205–208. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nittinger et al. (2005).Nittinger F, Haring E, Pinsker W, Wink M, Gamauf A. Out of Africa? Phylogenetic relationships between Falco biarmkus and the other hierofalcons (Aves: Falconidae) Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research. 2005;43:321–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2005.00326.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Oaks et al. (2004).Oaks JL, Gilbert M, Virani MZ, Watson RT, Meteyer CU, Rideout BA, Shivaprasad H, Ahmed S, Chaudhry MJI, Arshad M. Diclofenac residues as the cause of vulture population decline in Pakistan. Nature. 2004;427:630–633. doi: 10.1038/nature02317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ogada et al. (2016).Ogada D, Shaw P, Beyers RL, Buij R, Murn C, Thiollay JM, Beale CM, Holdo RM, Pomeroy D, Baker N. Another continental vulture crisis: Africa’s vultures collapsing toward extinction. Conservation Letters. 2016;9:89–97. doi: 10.1111/conl.12182. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Rattner et al. (2008).Rattner BA, Whitehead MA, Gasper G, Meteyer CU, Link WA, Taggart MA, Meharg AA, Pattee OH, Pain DJ. Apparent tolerance of turkey vultures (Cathartes aura) to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2008;27:2341–2345. doi: 10.1897/08-123.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruiz-Garcia et al. (2008).Ruiz-Garcia A, Bermejo M, Moss A, Casabo VG. Pharmacokinetics in drug discovery. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2008;97:654–690. doi: 10.1002/jps.21009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Seibold & Helbig (1995).Seibold I, Helbig AJ. Evolutionary history of New and Old World vultures inferred from nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society. 1995;350:163–178. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma et al. (2014).Sharma AK, Saini M, Singh SD, Prakash V, Das A, Dasan RB, Pandey S, Bohara D, Galligan TH, Green RE. Diclofenac is toxic to the Steppe Eagle Aquila nipalensis: widening the diversity of raptors threatened by NSAID misuse in South Asia. Bird Conservation International. 2014;24:282–286. doi: 10.1017/S0959270913000609. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Swan et al. (2006b).Swan GE, Cuthbert R, Quevedo M, Green RE, Pain DJ, Bartels P, Cunningham AA, Duncan N, Meharg AA, Oaks JL, Parry-Jones J, Shultz S, Taggart MA, Verdoorn G, Wolter K. Toxicity of diclofenac to Gyps vultures. Biology Letters. 2006b;2:279–282. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Swan et al. (2006a).Swan G, Naidoo V, Cuthbert R, Green RE, Pain DJ, Swarup D, Prakash V, Taggart M, Bekker L, Das D. Removing the threat of diclofenac to critically endangered Asian vultures. PLOS Biology. 2006a;4:e66. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Watanabe et al. (2013).Watanabe KP, Kawai YK, Ikenaka Y, Kawata M, Ikushiro S-I, Sakaki T, Ishizuka M. Avian cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1-3 family genes: isoforms, evolutionary relationships, and mRNA expression in chicken liver. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(9):e75689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wink (1995).Wink M. Phylogeny of Old and New World vultures (Aves: Accipitridae and Cathartidae) inferred from nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung C. 1995;50:868–882. doi: 10.1515/znc-1995-11-1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wink et al. (2004).Wink M, Sauer-Gurth H, Ellis D, Kenward R. Phylogenetic relationships in the Hierofalco complex (Saker-, Gyr-, Lanner-, Laggar Falcon) In: Chancellor RD, Meyburg B-U, editors. Raptors worldwide. Berlin: WWGPB; 2004. pp. 499–504. [Google Scholar]
  • Yang, Ye & Huang (2016).Yang J, Ye F, Huang Y. Mitochondrial genomes of four katydids (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae): New gene rearrangements and their phylogenetic implications. Gene. 2016;575:702–711. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.09.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Genomic sequences of Gyps coprotheres mitochondrial genome.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10034/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Phylogenetic Analysis Result using COX 1 Mitogene.

Results of Phylogenetic analyses using maximum likelihood (ML) analysis indicated evolutionary relationships among 32 raptor species based on COXI sequences. Strix leptogrammica was used as outgroup. Bootstrap support values for ML analyses are indicated on the nodes. The solid border rectangle indicates a close phylogenetic relationship between old world vultures and eagles confirmed with high bootstrap values with greater chances of shared susceptibility based on their close evolutionary relationship. While distantly related raptor bird species included within the broken border rectangle are less likely to succumb to diclofenac toxicity as reported for turkey vulture (Cathartes aura) (Rattner et al., 2008).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10034/supp-2

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The data is available at GenBank: PRJNA389655.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES