Skip to main content
PMC home page
Atencion Primaria logoLink to Atencion Primaria
. 2013 Apr 3;33(7):391–399. [Article in Spanish] doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(04)78892-7

Navegando en Internet en busca de información sanitaria: no es oro todo lo que reluce…

JJ Mira a,b,*, V Pérez-Jover a, S Lorenzo b
PMCID: PMC7668641  PMID: 15117635

The content is available as a PDF (331.4 KB).

Este artículo ha sido realizado gracias a la financiación de los proyectos del Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria 1099/00 y 0480/01

Bibliografía

  • 1.Jadad A.R., Sigouin C., Cocking L., Whelan T., Browman G. Internet use among physicians, nurses, and their patients. Jama. 2001;286:1451–1452. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.12.1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Carrasco G. Medicina basada en la evidencia «electrónica» (e-MBE): metodología, ventajas y limitaciones. Rev Calidad Asistencial. 2002;17:113–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Eysenbach G., Ryoung E., Diepsen T.L. Shopping around the internet today and tomorrow: towards the millennium of cybermedicine. Bmj. 1999;319:1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jadad A.R., Delamothe T. From electronic gadgets to better health: where is the knowledge? Bmj. 2003;327:300–301. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gutierrez U., Blanco A. Información para pacientes en español en Internet. Aten Primaria. 2001;28:283–288. doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(01)78948-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sigouin C., Jadad A. Awareness of sources of peer-reviewed research evidence on the Internet. Jama. 2002;287:2867–2869. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eysenbach G. Consumer health informatics. Bmj. 2000;320:1713–1716. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Estudio General de Medios febrero-marzo 2003. Instituto de Estadística Comunidad de Madrid [consultado 1/05/2003]. Disponible http://www8.madrid.org/iestadis/es150403.htm
  • 9.The Society for Adolescent Medicine [consultado 29/04/2003]. Disponible http://www.adolescenthealth.org/
  • 10.Miller T.E., Derse A.R. Between strangers: the practice of medicine online. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21:168–179. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.El marco de desarrollo de la e-salud en España. Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Doc. ISCIII/ AITYSI/20010213 [consultado 24/3/2003]. Disponible en:http://api.isciii.es/e-salud/e-salud.html
  • 12.García-Eroles L., Illa C., Arias A., Casas M. Los top 20 2000: objetivos, ventajas y limitaciones del método. Rev Calidad Asistencial. 2001;16:107–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.US News [consultado 8/1/2003]. Disponible www.usnews.com/
  • 14.Marshall M.N., Shekekke P., Leatherman S. Brook RH.The public release of performance data? What do we to gain? A review of the evidence? Jama. 2000;283:1866–1874. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.14.1866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mira J.J., Lorenzo S., Martínez A. Difusión de resultados asistenciales: ventajas e inconvenientes de los report cards. Rev Calidad Asistencial. 2003;18:209–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jacob J. Consumer access to health care information: its effect on the physician-patient relationship. Alaska Med. 2002;44:75–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Murray E., Davis H., See Tai S., Coulter A., Gray A., Haines A. Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. Bmj. 2001;323:493–496. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7311.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eysenbach G., Köhler C.h. How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. Bmj. 2002;324:573–577. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Diario del Consumidor [consultado 29/04/03]. Disponible www.consumer.es/web/es/actualidad
  • 20.Abreu González R, Abreu Reyes JA, Ferrer-Roca O. Pacientes on-line: un reto para el médico. Arch Soc Canar Oftal 2001; 12 [consultado 29/04/03]. Disponible en:http://www.oftalmo.com/sco/revista-12/indi01.htm
  • 21.Whelan T., Gafni A., Charles C., Levine M. Lessons learned from the decision board: a unique and evolving decision aid. Health Expectations. 2000;3:69–76. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2000.00084.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mira J.J., Rodríguez-Marín J. Análisis de las condiciones en las que los pacientes toman decisiones responsables. Med Clin (Barc) 2001;116:104–110. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(01)71737-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Report on the Online Health Care Revolution [consultado 28/04/2003]. Disponible en:http://www.pewinternet.org
  • 24.Casino G. Salud de self-service. Escepticemia 2001;113 [consultado 30/04/03]. Disponible en:http://db2.doyma.es/cgi-bin/wdbcgi.exe/doyma/pescepticemia.plantilla?pident=1433
  • 25.Pandolfini C.h., Bonati M. Follow up of quality of public oriented health information on the world wide web: systematic re-evaluation. Bmj. 2002;324:582–583. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gilliam A.D., Speake W.J., Scholefield J.H., Beckingham I.J. Finding the best from the rest: evaluation of the quality of patient information on the Internet. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003;85:44–46. doi: 10.1308/003588403321001435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Health On The Net Foundation [consultado 28/04/03]. Disponible en:http://www.hon.ch/
  • 28.Louro González A., González Guitián C. Portales sanitarios para la atención primaria. Aten Primaria. 2001;27:346–350. doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(01)79380-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Impicciatore P., Pandolfini C., Casella N., Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide wed: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. Bmj. 1997;314:1875–1879. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wyatt J. Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the world wide web. Bmj. 1997;314:1879–1881. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sanz A. Publicidad de medicamentos y productos milagro en Internet. Farmacia Clínica. 1998;15:243–247. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sanz A. Calidad de la información de medicamentos en Internet: evaluación de la información al paciente sobre antirretrovíricos. Atención Farmacéutica. 1999;1:64–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li L., Irvin E., Guzman J., Bombardier C. Surgery for back pain patients. Spine. 2001;26:545–557. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103010-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Suárez-Almazor M.E., Kendall C.h., Dorgan M. Surfing the Net. Information on the World Wide Web for persons with arthritis: patient empowerment of patient deceit? J Rheumatol. 2001;28:185–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kunst H., Groot D., Latthe P., Khan K. Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics. Bmj. 2002;324:581–582. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bessell T., McDonald S., Silagy C.h., Anderson J., Hiller J., Sansom L. Do Internet interventions for consumers cause more harm than good? A systematic review. Health Expectations. 2002;5:28–37. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00156.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ávila de Tomás J.F., Portillo Boyero B.E., Pajares Izquierdo J.M. Calidad en la información biomédica existente en Internet. Aten Primaria. 2001;28:674–679. doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(01)70483-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Berland G., Elliot M.N., Morales L.S., Algazy J.I., Kravitz R.L., Broder M.S. Health information on the Internet. Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. Jama. 2001;285:2612–2621. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.20.2612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hain T. Improving the quality of health information: the contribution of C-H-I-Q. Health Expectations. 2002;5:270–273. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00189.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Eysenbach G., Powell J., Kuss O., Sa E.-R. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web. A systematic review. Jama. 2002;287:2691–2700. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gagliardi A., Jadad A. Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyager with an unclear destination. Bmj. 2002;324:569–573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Smith S.P. Internet visits: a new approach to chronic disease management. J Med Pract Manage. 2002;17:330–332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schaffer J.L., Plona S., Omori S., Miller H., Harris C.M. The consult is real, the visit is virtual. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2002;16:30–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bessell T.L., Anderson J.N., Silagy C.A., Sansom L.N., Hiller J.E. Surfing, self-medicating and safety: buying non-prescription and complementary medicines via the internet. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:88–92. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.2.88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Canal Salud [consultado 26/04/03]. Disponible http://www.canalsalud.com/massalud/lasdiez.htm
  • 46.Jadad A., Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet.Navigating to knowledge or to Babel? Jama. 1998;279:611–614. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.8.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Risk A., Petersen C. Health information on the Internet. Quality issues and international initiatives. Jama. 2002;287:2713–2715. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kim P., Eng T.R., Deering M.J., Maxfield F. Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites. Bmj. 1999;318:647–649. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7184.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Crocco A.G., Villasis-Keever M., Jadad A.R. Two wrongs don't make a right: harm aggravated by inaccurate information on internet. Pediatrics. 2002;109:522–523. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.3.522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Delamothe T. Quality of websites: kitemarking the west wind. Bmj. 2000;321:843–844. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7265.843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Atencion Primaria are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES