Table 1:
Response patterns for eligible households by SAPRIN node and interview round
| Node | Wave | Phone out of order /wrong number |
Phone not answered |
Refused call |
Successful | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agincourt | 1 | 257 | (14.6%) | 190 | (10.8%) | 155 | (6.2%) | 1,159 | (65.8%) |
| 2 | 35 | (3.1%) | 46 | (4.1%) | 28 | (2.5%) | 1,013 | (90.3%) | |
| 3 | 35 | (3.3%) | 48 | (4.6%) | 24 | (2.3%) | 944 | (89.8%) | |
| 4 | 56 | (4.8%) | 72 | (6.2%) | 27 | (2.3%) | 1,004 | (86.6%) | |
| 5 | 93 | (8.1%) | 76 | (6.6%) | 32 | (2.8%) | 951 | (82.6%) | |
| 6 | 42 | (7.4%) | 63 | (11.1%) | 26 | (4.6%) | 439 | (77.0%) | |
| AHRI | 1 | 69 | (9.2%) | 69 | (9.2%) | 8 | (1.1%) | 604 | (80.5%) |
| 2 | 63 | (8.4%) | 140 | (18.7%) | 17 | (2.3%) | 530 | (70.7%) | |
| 3 | 49 | (6.5%) | 185 | (24.7%) | 24 | (3.2%) | 492 | (65.6%) | |
| 4 | 69 | (9.2%) | 90 | (12.0%) | 20 | (2.7%) | 571 | (76.1%) | |
| 5 | 79 | (10.5%) | 136 | (18.1%) | 18 | (2.4%) | 517 | (68.9%) | |
| 6 | 52 | (6.9%) | 158 | (21.1%) | 8 | (1.1%) | 532 | (70.9%) | |
| 7 | 45 | (7.3%) | 126 | (20.6%) | 9 | (1.5%) | 433 | (70.6%) | |
| DIMAMO | 1 | 82 | (9.3%) | 63 | (7.2%) | 31 | (3.5%) | 705 | (80.0%) |
| 2 | 87 | (10.0%) | 78 | (8.9%) | 32 | (3.7%) | 677 | (77.5%) | |
| 3 | 41 | (8.0%) | 41 | (8.0%) | 38 | (7.4%) | 395 | (76.7%) | |
| Total | 1,053 | (7.6%) | 1,485 | (10.7%) | 435 | (3.1%) | 10,966 | (78.7%) | |
All interviews up to 31st August 2020. Last round at each node is incomplete, hence lower total numbers. 464 of the 2,225 households initially sampled by Agincourt, and 119 of the 1,000 households initially sampled by DIMAMO did not have valid telephone numbers and are excluded here. From wave 2, Agincourt only sought to reach the 1159 households that participated in wave 1, although in waves 2 and 3 some households were unintentionally not contacted and in wave 5 seven households were intentionally not contacted due to either involvement in other intensive studies or having left the area.