Skip to main content
PMC home page
Atencion Primaria logoLink to Atencion Primaria
. 2008 Nov 18;38(5):293–298. [Article in Spanish] doi: 10.1157/13092989

Demanda inducida por el profesional: aplicaciones de la teoría económica a la práctica clínica☆

Juan Ángel Bellón Saameño 1,⁎
PMCID: PMC7668848  PMID: 17020715

The content is available as a PDF (103.6 KB).

Footnotes

☆

Parte de los contenidos de este trabajo han sido publicados como comunicación oral en el XXIV Congreso Nacional de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Sevilla 2004; obteniendo un premio a la mejor comunicación oral del congreso. También ha sido publicado en parte en la 11th Conference of European Society of General Practice/Family Medicine, Kos Island, Greece 2005.

Bibliografía

  • 1.Labelle R., Stoddart G., Rice T. A Re-examination of the meaning and importance of supplier-induced demand. J Health Econ. 1994;13:347–368. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)90036-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Deb P., Trivedi P.K. The structure of demand for health care: latent class versus two-part models. J Health Econ. 2002;21:601–625. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(02)00008-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Iversen T. The effects of a patient shortage on general practitioners’ future income and list of patients. J Health Econ. 2004;23:673–694. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carlsen F., Grytten J. Consumer satisfaction and supplier induced demand. J Health Econ. 2000;19:731–753. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00044-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Phillips K.A., Morrison K.R., Andersen R., Aday L.A. Understanding the context of healthcare utilization: assessing environmental and provider-related variables in the Behavioral Model of Utilization. Health Serv Res. 1998;33:571–596. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hurley J., Woodward C., Brown Changing patterns of physician services utilization in Ontario, Canada, and their relation to physician, practice, and market-area characteristics. Med Care Res Rev. 1996;53:179–206. doi: 10.1177/107755879605300204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Martínez-Cañavate T., Bellón J.A., Delgado A., Luna J.D., López L.A., Lardelli P. Modelo multinivel explicativo de la utilización de las consultas de atención primaria a partir de los factores del profesional y la organización. Aten Primaria. 2004;34:137–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.McPake B., Kumaranayake L., Normand D. Supplier-induced Demand Agency. In: McPake B., Kumaranayake L., Normand D., editors. Health Economics, an international perspective. Routledge; London: 2002. pp. 48–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Jaegher K., Jegers M. The physician-patient relationship as a game of strategic information transmission. Health Econ. 2001;10:601–668. doi: 10.1002/hec.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eisenberg J.M., Nicklin D. Use of diagnostic services by physicians in community practice. Med Care. 1981;19:297–309. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198103000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sorensen R.J., Grytten J. Compettion and supplier-induced demand in a health care system with fixed fees. Health Econ. 1999;8:497–508. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199909)8:6<497::aid-hec439>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Altisent R., Brotons C., González R., Serrat D., Júdez J., Gracia D. Ética de la actividad preventiva en atención primaria. Med Clin (Barc) 2001;117:740–750. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(01)72243-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wayland M.T., Culik D., Bonzelaar W., Lukas J., Dunchok R., Coombs T. Differences in the use of consultations by family medicine and internal medicine physicians. J Med Educ. 1988;63:921–923. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198812000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bertakis K.D., Callahan E.J., Helms L.J., Azari R., Robbins J.A., Miller J. Physician practice styles and patient outcomes. Differences between family practice and general internal medicine. Med Care. 1998;36:879–891. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199806000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eisenberg J.M. Physician utilization: the state of research about physicians’ practice patterns. Med Care. 2002;40:1016–1035. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000032181.98320.8D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wennberg J.E., Barnes B.A., Zubkoff M. Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16:811–824. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90234-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sarría A., Rodríguez P. Variabilidad en la práctica clínica. In: Del Llano J., Ortún V., Martín J.M., Millán J., Gené J., editors. Gestión sanitaria: innovaciones y desafíos. Masson; Barcelona: 1998. pp. 513–527. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Delgado A, Bellón JA, Martínez-Cañavate T, López LA, LunaJD, Lardelli P. Las dimensiones del clima organizacional percibidas por los médicos de familia. Aten Primaria. En prensa 2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 19.Simón P. La ética de las organizaciones sanitarias: el segundo estadio de desarrollo de la bioética. Rev Calidad Asistencial. 2002;17:247–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mooney G. Harvester Wheatsheaf; New York: 1994. Key issues in health economics. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ortún V. La economía en sanidad y medicina: instrumentos y limitaciones. EUGE, S.A.; Barcelona: 1991. Mercado y estado en sanidad. p. 47-68. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rossiter L.F., Wilensky G.R. A re-examination of the use of physician services: the role of physician-iniciated demand. Inquiry. 1983;20:162–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bellón JA. Como reducir la utilización de las consultas de atención primaria y no morir en el intento (II): estrategias con el profesional y la organización. 1998. Disponible en: http://www.cap-semfyc.com
  • 24.Bertakis K.D., Azari R., Callahan E.J., Robbins J.A., Helms L.J. Comparison of primary care resident physicians’ practice styles during initial and return patients visits. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:495–498. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.05068.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Armstrong D., Glanville T., Bailey E., O’Keefe G. Doctor-initiated consultations: a study of communication between general practitioners and patients about the need for reattendance. Br J Gen Pract. 1990;40:241–242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wennberg J.E. On patient need, supplier-induced demand, and the need to assess the outcome for common medical practices. Med Care. 1985;23:512–520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carlsen F., Grytten J. More phsysicians: improve availability or induced demand? Health Econ. 1998;7:495–508. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199809)7:6<495::aid-hec368>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bartlett W. The regulation of general practice in the UK. Int J Health Planning Manag. 1996;11:3–18. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199601)11:1<3::AID-HPM411>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Grytten J., Sorensen R. Type of contract and supplier-induced demand for primary physicians in Norway. J Health Econ. 2001;20:379–393. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00087-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bellón J.A., Martínez-Cañavate T., Delgado A., Luna J.D., López L.A., Lardelli P. WONCA Europe; Kos Island: 2005. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire of demand induced by GP. 11th Conference of the European Society of General Practice/Family Medicine. Book of Absstracs, p. 257-8. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Grytten J., Carlsen F., Sorensen R. Supplier inducement in a public health care system. J Health Econ. 1995;14:207–229. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00036-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hakkinen U. The production of health and the demand for health in Finland. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33:225–237. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90356-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Roos N.P., Carrière K.C., Friesen D. Factors influencing the frequency of visits by hypertensive patients to primary care physicians in Winnipeg. CMAJ. 1998;159:777–783. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Birtwhistle R.V., Godwin M.S., Delva M.D., Casson R.I., Lam M., McDonald S.E. Randomised equivalence trial comparing three and six months of follow up of patients with hypertension by family practitioners. BMJ. 2004;328:204–206. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37967.374063.EE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Carroli G., Villar J., Piaggio G., Khan-Neelofur D., Gülmezoglu M., Mugford M. WHO systematic review of randomised controlled trials of routine antenatal care. Lancet. 2001;357:1565–1570. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04723-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rosser W.W., Shafir M.S. Medical Trends, S.L.; Barcelona: 2001. Medicina familiar basada en pruebas científicas. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Casajuana J., Bellón J.A. Gestión de la consulta en Atención Primaria. In: Martín-Zurro A., Cano-Pérez J.F., editors. Atención primaria: conceptos, organización y práctica clínica. Elsevier España, S.A.; Barcelona: 2003. pp. 84–109. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Orozco D., Pedrera V., Gil V., Prieto I., Rivera M.C., Martínez P. Gestión clínica de la consulta: previsibilidad y contenido clínico (estudio SyN-PC) Aten Primaria. 2004;33:69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(04)79354-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Willis DR. Making every minute count: to improve office efficiency. Family Practice Management,April 2005. Disponible en: http://www.aafp.org/fpm/20050400/61maki.htm1 [PubMed]
  • 40.Gillam S., Pencheon D. Managing demand in general practice. BMJ. 1998;316:1895–1898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7148.1895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Keeler E.B. A model of demand for effective care. J Health Econ. 1995;14:231–238. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00046-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Atencion Primaria are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES