Abstract
Diarrhea is often a presenting symptom in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Frequently diagnosed in advanced stages, carcinoid syndrome diarrhea negatively impacts patients’ well-being and quality of life. This article will review the diagnostic work-up for neuroendocrine tumors and etiology and management of NET-related carcinoid syndrome diarrhea and provide guidance for advanced practitioners, including nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, and dieticians, focusing on their role in patient and caregiver education regarding disease, symptom monitoring and management, development of patient-specific treatment, and survivorship plans.
CASE STUDY
A 54-year-old male presented with complaints of periodic facial flushing and diarrhea for more than a year. He is experiencing debilitating diarrhea, with loose or watery stools accompanied by abdominal pain and fecal urgency up to 20 times per day. Medical history was significant for bowel obstruction requiring hospital admission, which eventually improved with medical management, including nasogastric decompression. Due to ongoing diarrhea, he is unable to work as a computer technician or participate in family and leisure activities.
Diagnostic workup for possible neuroendocrine tumor (NET) showed significant elevation in 24-hour urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) at 250 mg (normal: 0–6 mg/24 hr) and chromogranin A (CGA) at 525 ng/mL (normal: 0–5 ng/mL). A CT scan of the abdomen showed multiple tumors in the right lobe of the liver. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (octreotide scan) was strongly positive for somatostatin receptor expression within the tumors in the liver. An ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of a tumor in the liver showed a well-differentiated metastatic grade 2 NET.
The patient was initially treated with 30 mg of octreotide long-acting formulation (LAR; Sandostatin LAR) intramuscular (IM) injection once every 28 days for symptom management, with the added expectation of slowing tumor progression. His symptoms improved, and he was able to return to work. After nearly 3 years of octreotide LAR treatment, the diarrhea returned, creating significant disruption in his personal and work life and with substantial decline in his productivity level despite working from home. Steatorrhea from the somatostatin analog therapy was ruled out. Abdominal CT showed an increase in the number of tumors in the right lobe of the liver. Radioembolization was performed, and octreotide LAR was continued at the same dose. Subsequently, symptom improvement was noted, and the patient was able to return to work.
At the 6-month follow-up, diarrhea of up to 8 to 10 stools per day with abdominal pain and urgency had returned. Other causes of the diarrhea, such as steatorrhea, bile salt malabsorption, infection, and hyperglycemia, were ruled out, and abdominal CT showed no disease progression. Daily oral telotristat ethyl (Xermelo) 250 mg three times daily was added to octreotide to address control of diarrhea.
Restaging abdominal CT scans performed at later follow-up visits have shown stable disease, and the patient continues octreotide LAR at 30 mg every 28 days and telotristat ethyl at 250 mg three times daily. Diarrhea and other carcinoid syndrome symptoms are well controlled; the patient is currently having one to two semi-formed bowel movements daily and intermittent facial flushing. The 24-hour urine 5-HIAA is normal at 10 mg/24 hours and his chromogranin A is 141 ng/mL. He can participate in family and leisure activities, and he is able to work throughout the entire workday.
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are neoplasms found in neuroendocrine tissues, occurring most commonly in the bronchopulmonary system and gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The most common primary sites of GI-NETs include the small bowel, rectum, colon, pancreas, stomach, and appendix (Choti et al., 2012; Lawrence et al., 2011). Patients are often asymptomatic, and early tumor detection is usually an incidental finding. Diagnosis may be delayed for years. Small-bowel NETs present with metastases in 40% to 50% of cases, most commonly to the regional lymph nodes and liver (Bertani et al., 2015).
EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION
In the United States, both the incidence and prevalence of NETs across all primary tumor sites, stages, and grades has risen (Dasari et al., 2017). Neuroendocrine tumors are identified as functioning or nonfunctioning, and characterized by symptoms or syndromes associated with hormones secreted by the tumor (Table 1; Strosberg, 2017a). Symptoms are often vague and easily mistaken for more common diagnoses, and typical overt symptoms present only with liver metastases (Molina-Cerrillo, Alonso-Gordoa, Martínez-Sáez, & Grande, 2016; van der Lely & de Herder, 2005).
Table 1. Sites of NETs, Associated Symptoms, and Secreted Hormones.
Hormone | Common location | Tumor | Key symptoms |
---|---|---|---|
Serotonin | Small intestine, stomach, pancreas, duodenum, colon, appendix rectum | NET (carcinoid) | Diarrhea, cutaneous flushing, bronchospasm, valvular heart disease |
Insulin | Pancreas | Insulinoma | Hypoglycemia, confusion, loss of consciousness, sweating or dizziness, weight increase |
Gastrin | Duodenum, pancreas | Gastrinoma | Acid reflux, abdominal pain, diarrhea, fat malabsorption |
Glucagon | Pancreas | Glucagonoma | Diabetes mellitus, skin lesions (necrolytic migratory erythema), glossitis, anemia, weight loss, venous thrombosis |
VIP | Pancreas | VIPoma | Diarrhea, hypokalemia, metabolic acidosis |
ACTH | Lung, adrenals, thyroid, pancreas | ACTHoma | Muscle weakness, hypokalemia, weight changes, truncal obesity, hypertension, diabetes |
PTH | Lung, pancreas | PTH-like-oma | Hypercalcemia |
Somatostatin | Pancreas, duodenum | Somatostatinoma | Abdominal pain, jaundice, gastrointestinal bleeding, gallstones, diarrhea, diabetes, weight loss, hypochlorhydria |
Note. NET = neuroendocrine tumor; ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; PTH = parathyroid hormone; VIP = vasoactive intestinal peptide. Information from Camilleri (2015); Sandhu & Jialal (2018); Vinik et al. (2010); Zandee et al. (2017).
THE ROLE OF NETs IN CARCINOID SYNDROME AND CARCINOID SYNDROME-RELATED DIARRHEA
Carcinoid syndrome presents in 8% to 35% of NETs in the small bowel, terminal ileum, and the appendix, and less commonly in the pancreas and lung (Halperin et al., 2017; Molina-Cerrillo et al., 2016; Phan et al., 2017; Tsoukalas et al., 2017; Zandee et al., 2017). The most common symptoms are cutaneous flushing (45%–96%), diarrhea (58%–100%), wheezing (3%–18%) and, uncommonly, carcinoid heart disease, or mesenteric or pulmonary fibrosis (Creutzfeldt, 1996; Dimitriadis, Weickert, Randeva, Kaltsas, & Grossman, 2016; Ito, Lee, & Jensen, 2018; Mota, Sousa, & Riechelmann, 2016). Diarrhea may be explosive, watery, and loose multiple times a day, adversely impacting daily life and physical, emotional, and social well-being (Fröjd, Larsson, Lampic, & von Essen, 2007; Isenberg-Grzeda, Macgregor, Matsoukas, Reidy-Lagunes, & Alici, 2017).
PATHOBIOLOGY OF CARCINOID SYNDROME
Carcinoid syndrome is caused by the NET secretion of vasoactive compounds: serotonin, histamine, prostaglandin, tachykinins, and kallikrein (Molina-Cerrillo et al., 2016). Serotonin plays a central role by acting directly on the cell membrane receptors of enteric neurons enhancing peristalsis and secretory reflexes, increasing colonic mucus, and inhibiting absorption in the gastrointestinal tract, the combination of which leads to diarrhea (Lips, Lentjes, & Höppener, 2003). In the peripheral circulation, serotonin is metabolized by the liver and kidney and is converted to 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), which is eliminated by the urine.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF NONINFECTIOUS DIARRHEA IN PATIENTS WITH NETS ON SSAs
Differential diagnosis includes ruling out pancreatic insufficiency associated with somatostatin analogs (SSAs), short gut syndrome (particularly in the case of ileocecal valve resection), biliary salt malabsorption due to surgery, administration site fibrosis, infectious diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile, development or worsening of diabetes due to SSA treatment, food poisoning, and poor adherence to treatment (Strosberg et al., 2017b).
THE CARCINOID SYNDROME DIARRHEA PATIENT EXPERIENCE
Carcinoid syndrome diarrhea places a significant burden on affected patients, leading to long-term suffering due to diagnosis delays and misdiagnoses. One study of 758 patients reported delay in diagnosis from symptom onset to diagnosis of 5 or more years in 37% of patients (Wolin et al., 2017).
Compared to patients without NETs and those with other cancers, patients with NETs have higher rates of mortality and hepatic and gastrointestinal morbidities (Hess et al., 2012), depression (Isenberg-Grzeda et al., 2017), and cognitive impairment (Pasieka et al., 2014), including impairment of physical function, sleep, fatigue, and more anxiety (Beaumont et al., 2012; Pearman, Beaumont, Cella, Neary, & Yao, 2016). In patients with malignant tumors, weight loss and malnutrition are linked to negative outcomes, including excess mortality and morbidity, and higher treatment costs (Weickert et al., 2017). Diarrhea appears to have an overwhelming impact on patients’ sense of well-being. In the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) survey of global health, patients with more than 4 bowel movements per day had significantly worse quality-of-life (QOL) scores across all domains, including mental health, physical health, and social role satisfaction (Pearman et al, 2016). Diarrhea, bowel movement frequency, and urgency were most frequently identified as the most important or bothersome symptoms in a smaller study (Anthony et al., 2017).
TREATING CLINICAL SYMPTOMS OF CARCINOID SYNDROME DIARRHEA
According to NCCN Guidelines, first-line therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic NETs should target tumor progression and associated symptoms (Table 2; NCCN, 2018). Surgical debulking can promptly resolve symptoms of diarrhea and cutaneous flushing, and may translate to improved survival (Lee, Cheow, Teo, & Ooi, 2012). Because the disease course of NETs can span decades, palliative care is particularly important to maintain QOL, decrease complications, and prolong life (Anthony & Freda, 2009).
Table 2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for the Management of Symptomatic Patients With NET of the Gastrointestinal Tract.
Disease stage | Management | Guideline Recommendations |
---|---|---|
First line | Resection | • Resection of primary tumor should be considered in locally symptomatic patients |
• Ablative techniques (radiofrequency, microwave, and cryotherapy) are options for metastases; however, prospective data for these interventions are limited | ||
SSAs (octreotide or lanreotide) | • Recommended for first-line control of tumor growth | |
• Octreotide LAR is appropriate for long-term management of patients with carcinoid syndrome | ||
• Short-acting octreotide can be added to octreotide LAR for rapid relief of symptoms or breakthrough symptoms | ||
• SSA would better benefit patients who have positive somatostatin receptor expression on imaging (octreoscan/Ga-68 dotatate PET) | ||
Progressive disease | SSAs (octreotide or lanreotide) | • Treatment should be continued in patients with functional tumors and can be added to other treatment options |
• May be used in patients with low-grade tumors as first-line therapy to stabilize disease | ||
Everolimus | • Option for patients with disease progression; however, the safety and effectiveness of everolimus has not been established in patients with carcinoid syndrome | |
177Lu-DOTATATE | • Recommended for patients with somatostatin receptor–positive imaging | |
Hepatic-directed therapy | • Appropriate for hepatic-predominant disease/hepatic progression | |
• Options include arterial embolization, hepatic chemoembolization, hepatic radioembolization, or cytoreductive surgery/ablative therapy | ||
INFα | • Usually only initiated after failure of SSA treatment; out of favor now | |
Cytotoxic chemotherapy | • Should only be considered as a last treatment option | |
• There are no data to support a specific sequence of regional vs. systemic therapy and no data to guide sequencing of systemic options | ||
Refractory disease | Telotristat ethyl + SSAs | • Recommended for persistent diarrhea that is not controlled by SSAs alone |
Hepatic arterial embolization ± cytoreductive surgery | • Appropriate for hepatic predominant disease | |
Other systemic therapy based on disease site | • Cytotoxic chemotherapy can be used in patients with progressive disease and no other treatment options |
Note. LAR = long-acting release; PET = positron emission tomography; Lu = lutetium; SSA = somatostatin analog; INFα = interferon alpha. Information from NCCN (2018).
First-line medical treatment of carcinoid syndrome, typically with long-acting SSAs, is aimed at activating the somatostatin receptor to stabilize tumor growth, inhibit hormonal hypersecretion of NETs, reduce circulating hormone levels, and ameliorate patient symptoms (Anthony & Freda, 2009). Both octreotide (Sandostatin LAR) and lanreotide (Somatuline Depot) long-acting SSAs are administered as either an intramuscular or deep subcutaneous injection. Octreotide acetate (Sandostatin) may also be administered via short-acting subcutaneous injection (Table 3; NCCN 2018).
Table 3. Carcinoid Syndrome–Specific Therapies.
Agent class | MOA | Treatment | Indication | ROA | Schedule |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAs | Binds to somatostatin receptors to mimic somatostatin inhibition of various endocrine, neuroendocrine, exocrine, and paracrine functions | Octreotide acetate | Symptomatic treatment of severe diarrhea and cutaneous flushing episodes associated with metastatic carcinoid tumors | Subcutaneously or intravenously | • First 2 weeks of treatment: 100–600 μg/d in 2–4 divided doses (mean daily dosage: 300 μg) |
Octreotide LAR | Severe diarrhea and cutaneous flushing episodes associated with metastatic carcinoid tumors in patients who responded and tolerated octreotide acetate | Intramuscular | • 30 mg q4wka | ||
• Consider dose reducing to 20 mg q4wk for patients who are frail or do not tolerate therapy secondary to side effects | |||||
Lanreotide | Adult patients with unresectable, well- or moderately differentiated, locally advanced or metastatic GEP-NETs to improve PFS; adults with carcinoid syndrome to reduce frequency of short-acting somatostatin analog rescue therapy | Deep subcutaneous | • 120 mg q4wk | ||
• Consider dose reducing to 90 mg q4wk for patients who are frail or do not tolerate full dose secondary to side effects | |||||
Tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor | Inhibits tryptophan hydroxylase, which catalyzes the rate-limiting step in serotonin production | Telotristat ethyl | Carcinoid syndrome diarrhea in combination with SSAs in adults inadequately controlled by SSAs | Oral | • 250 mg po 3 times per day with food |
Note. MOA = mechanism of action; ROA = route of administration; SSA = somatostatin analog; GEP-NETs = gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; PFS = progression-free survival; po = by mouth; q4wk = every 4 weeks. Information from Ipsen Pharma Biotech (2018); Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. (2008, 2016); Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2017).
30 mg q4wk is the dose most commonly used.
Octreotide was the first agent used in managing NETs. Pooled data from 14 trials of approximately 400 patients reported the resolution of diarrhea in a median of 71% (range: 40%–88%) and cutaneous flushing in a median of 71% (range: 48%–100%; Modlin et al., 2006). In an 8-year study of 108 patients with symptomatic NETs, all patients showed clinical response within 3 months of initiating long-acting octreotide. The PROMID study demonstrated that long-acting octreotide significantly prolonged the median time to progression (14.3 vs. 6.0 months with placebo) or tumor-related death vs. placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.20–0.59; p < .0001; Rinke et al., 2009).
Lanreotide has also shown clinical efficacy in NETs. In the CLARINET trial (N = 204), lanreotide was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival vs. placebo (HR, 0.47; 95% CI = 0.30–0.73; p < .001; Caplin et al., 2014) and with significantly fewer days of octreotide rescue (–14.8%; 95% CI = –26.8% to –2.8%; p = .017) reported in the phase III, placebo-controlled ELECT trial (Vinick et al., 2016). A post hoc analysis of the ELECT trial reported lanreotide significantly improved diarrhea and cutaneous flushing control over 48 weeks (Fisher et al., 2018a, 2018b).
There are several potential causes of diarrhea in NET patients, and identifying the root cause is essential to optimizing treatment (Table 4). Antidiarrheal medications (tincture of opium, loperamide, and diphenoxylate atropine) do not address the underlying changes in motor function and have minimal effects on symptoms (von der Ohe, Camilleri, Kvols, & Thomforde, 1993).
Table 4. Differential Diagnosis of Noninfectious Diarrhea in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Type | Causes | Symptoms |
---|---|---|
Carcinoid syndrome | • Overproduction of serotonin produced by neuroendocrine tumors | • Diarrhea |
• Cutaneous flushing | ||
• /asthma-like symptoms | ||
Short gastrointestinal transit time | • Surgical resection of the small intestine for Crohn disease, trauma, malignancy, radiation, or mesenteric ischemia | • Diarrhea, loose watery stool |
• Dehydration, malnutrition, weight loss | ||
• Necrotizing enterocolitis and congenital intestinal anomalies, such as mid-gut volvulus, atresias, or gastroschisis | • Bloating, cramping, gas | |
• Weakness, fatigue | ||
• Food allergies | ||
Steatorrhea | • Pancreatic insufficiency due to chronic pancreatic inflammation and loss of acinar cells | • Passage of pale, bulky, and malodorous stool |
• Bile salt deficiency due to impaired production or secretion | • Usually BM right after eating, can be associated with bloating or abdominal discomfort, and with fatty foods | |
• Malabsorption due to small intestinal disease, surgery, or medications | ||
• Serotonin-induced hypermotility | ||
• Side effect of treatment with somatostatin analogs | ||
Bile acid diarrhea | • Ileal dysfunction and impaired reabsorption | • Watery stool |
• Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth | • Urgency | |
• Celiac disease | • Fecal incontinence | |
• Chronic pancreatitis | ||
• Excessive hepatic bile acid synthesis | ||
Uncontrolled blood glucose | • Development of diabetes, or worsening of preexisting diabetes due to SSA use | • Diarrhea, loose watery stools |
Note. BM = bowel movement; SSA = somatostatin analog. Information from Camilleri (2015); Riechelmann et al. (2017); Strosberg et al. (2017b).
Dose escalation of long-acting octreotide has been shown to be clinically effective in managing diarrhea that is responsive to initial treatment. In a retrospective review, 79% of those with persistent diarrhea who received octreotide LAR reported improvement or resolution of their symptoms following dose escalation (Strosberg et al., 2014). Tachyphylaxis has been reported, and some patients may not achieve control of diarrhea despite dose escalation or shortening of the dosing schedule to every 21 days (Al-Efraij, Aljama, & Kennecke, 2015; Chadha et al., 2009; Riechelmann, Pereira, Rego, & Costa, 2017). Another option is to switch to a different SSA (Riechelmann et al., 2017). One small study of 15 patients with metastatic NETs showed that switching from lanreotide to octreotide improved symptoms in 82% of patients. The median duration of response for diarrhea, abdominal pain, or both, was 6.5 months (Ricci et al., 2000).
Since the first SSA approval, there had been no new advances in treatments specifically for carcinoid syndrome diarrhea until the approval of telotristat ethyl (Xermelo) in 2017. Telotristat ethyl was approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration and by the European Medicines Agency in combination with SSA therapy in adults whose disease is not adequately controlled by SSA therapy and is the only treatment currently available that directly impacts symptoms of diarrhea by inhibiting tryptophan hydroxylase, resulting in blocking peripheral serotonin synthesis (Ipsen Pharmaceuticals, 2017; Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2017). National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines and prescribing information recommend the administration of telotristat ethyl at 250 mg orally three times per day with food to patients with carcinoid syndrome diarrhea that is unresponsive to first-line SSA therapy (NCCN, 2018).
The safety and efficacy of telotristat ethyl (250 mg or 500 mg) plus an SSA vs. placebo plus an SSA were established in the 12-week TELESTAR trial in 135 patients with four or more bowel movements per day despite stable SSA treatment (Kulke et al., 2017). Treatment was associated with significant reductions in bowel movement frequency over time in 44% and 42% of patients who received telotristat ethyl at 250 mg and 500 mg, respectively, compared to placebo, and an overall statistically significant reduction in urinary 5-HIAA levels at week 12 (p < .001) that was sustained through 48 weeks (Kulke et al., 2017; Pavel et al., 2018). An open-label extension noted sustained improvement in diarrhea and treatment over 48 weeks, with a dose-related improvement in weight gain vs. placebo (Weickert et al., 2017). A substudy in 35 patients who underwent exit interviews described a clinically meaningful reduction in bowel movement frequency (≥ 30% reduction in bowel movement frequency for at least 50% of the days) with telotristat ethyl treatment and satisfaction with symptom control (Anthony et al., 2017).
The overall incidence of adverse events, especially GI adverse events (nausea, abdominal pain, and vomiting), was greater among patients who received telotristat ethyl at 500 mg than 250 mg or placebo in the double-blind portion of the TELESTAR trial (Kulke et al., 2017). During the open-label portion of the study, the adverse event profile of the two doses of telotristat ethyl was generally similar to that seen in the double-blind portion of the study. Gastrointestinal events, while mild to moderate in severity, predominated (Pavel et al., 2018).
SUPPORTING THE CARCINOID SYNDROME DIARRHEA PATIENT
Advanced practice providers (APPs) have an opportunity to improve patient care by incorporating supportive measures to complement the pharmacologic and interventional management of carcinoid syndrome symptoms. Support encompasses patient and caregiver education regarding disease, monitoring, and managing the symptoms with nonpharmacologic measures, developing patient-specific treatment and survivorship plans, and coaching patients on how to best capture and communicate their symptoms to the health-care team.
Patients should be empowered to be participants in their care through education on the importance of keeping a record or diary of diarrhea, stool consistency, frequency, and accompanying symptoms and dietary triggers in order to have more productive discussions with health-care providers. For patients receiving treatment with SSAs who exhibit less relief of diarrhea, APPs should assess the preparation and administration technique.
It is important to determine the impact of symptoms on QOL, including anxiety, embarrassment, depression, and sleep disruptions due to nocturnal diarrhea (Yadegarfar et al., 2013). The negative impact of NET on a patient’s quality of life was demonstrated by the results of an anonymous, self-reported, global survey of nearly 2,000 patients with NET as reported by Singh and colleagues (2017). Questions regarding activities of daily living such as the ability to work, social interactions, and overall function help in assessing the level of QOL impact (Table 5).
Table 5. Questions to Assess the Impact of Carcinoid Syndrome Diarrhea on Patients’ Daily Lives.
Domain | Questions |
---|---|
Physical | • How many bowel movements do you have per day? |
• Do you have episodes of incontinence or fecal urgency during which you are not able to make it to the toilet in time? | |
• Have you experienced a change in your appetite? | |
• Have you experienced weight loss? Weight gain? | |
• Have you had a decrease in the number of bowel movements? | |
• Have you experienced a lessening of urgency with bowel movements? | |
• Have you had a decrease in the number of nocturnal bowel movements? | |
• Have you had an increase in abdominal pain? | |
• Have you experienced more nausea? Vomiting? Bloating? | |
• Has your blood glucose been elevated or decreased? Have you had hypoglycemic episodes (shaking, sweating, etc.)? | |
Social | • Do your diarrhea symptoms limit your ability to be active and/or social? |
• Do you have energy for the activities of daily living? | |
• Are you able to function throughout a full workday? | |
Emotional | • How is your overall sense of well-being? |
• Do you feel anxious or depressed due to your diarrhea? |
Note. Information from Yadegarfar et al. (2013).
Patients are often confused about the management of their NETs (Fröjd et al., 2007). Pearman and colleagues noted that more than 50% of patients desired clearer information on the long-term impact of NETs, increased access to NET specialist health-care professionals, better direction on where to find useful NET information, and more knowledgeable health-care professionals (Table 6; Pearman et al., 2016).
Table 6. Triggers for Excessive Symptoms: The Five “Es”.
Trigger | Response |
---|---|
Exercise | “Overexercise,” which could bring on excessive flushing and other symptoms |
Emotion | Avoid situations that evoke strong emotions, particularly anger and stress |
Ethanol | Small amounts of alcohol may be OK for some patients; red wine seems to be a particular trigger |
Eating | Avoid spicy food and “aged foods” like salami, certain cheeses, cooked tomatoes, and citrus |
Epinephrine | Alert emergency personnel in situations such as allergic reaction or a heart problem. Ask dentist for anesthetics without epinephrine. |
Note. Information from Northwood NETs (2012).
A collaborative approach to treatment that is patient centric and involves key stakeholders, such as family and caregivers, is particularly important in the development of a survivorship plan that manages and assesses patient expectations of treatment (Figure 1). Patients should be aware of what to expect, from imaging to lab work, and other testing that can contribute to a better sense of control and corresponding improvement in QOL. Reviewing the plan for managing breakthrough diarrhea provides the patient with a higher level of control. Finally, a patient may benefit from psychosocial assessment and support, potentially from an individual provider or patient groups, and social workers to help them navigate managing their disease (Oncology Nursing Society, 2015; Oncology Nursing Society Voice, 2018).
Figure 1.
Management of carcinoid syndrome diarrhea inadequately controlled by SSA therapy. SSA = somatostatin analog; 5-HIAA = 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid.
SUMMARY
Managing diarrhea in patients with NETs is an important aspect of managing carcinoid syndrome and enhancing QOL. Although SSAs are considered first-line therapy and commonly used, telotristat ethyl provides an effective, safe, and well-tolerated option for carcinoid syndrome diarrhea that is not controlled by SSAs alone.
Because NETs are often slow growing, chronic symptom management may be required for many years. The role of the APP in understanding the impact of carcinoid syndrome symptoms on patient QOL and oversight of care is critical. Coordination within the treatment team, patient education, monitoring of adherence to therapy, monitoring laboratory studies, and adjusting therapy based on individual response can improve the management of carcinoid syndrome diarrhea and patient QOL.
Acknowledgment
Medical writing and editorial assistance provided by Kathryn Martin (Publication Practice Counsel; Truposha, LLC), which was funded by Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Authors retain control of publication content and decisions, including the choice of journal.
Footnotes
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
REFERENCES
- Al-Efraij K., Aljama M. A., & Kennecke H. F. (2015). Association of dose escalation of octreotide long-acting release on clinical symptoms and tumor markers and response among patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Medicine, 4(6), 864–870. 10.1002/cam4.435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anthony L., & Freda P. U. (2009). From somatostatin to octreotide LAR: Evolution of a somatostatin analogue. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 25(12), 2989–2999. 10.1185/03007990903328959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anthony L., Ervin C., Lapuerta P., Kulke M. H., Kunz P., Bergsland E.,…DiBenedetti D. B. (2017). Understanding the patient experience with carcinoid syndrome: Exit interviews from a randomized, placebo-controlled study of telotristat ethyl. Clinical Therapeutics, 39(11), 2158–2168. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beaumont J. L., Cella D., Phan A. T., Choi S., Liu Z., & Yao J. C. (2012). Comparison of health-related quality of life in patients with neuroendocrine tumors with quality of life in the general US population. Pancreas, 41(3), 461–466. 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182328045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bertani E., Falconi M., Grana C., Botteri E., Chiappa A., Misitano P.,…Fazio N. (2015). Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastases and resection of the primary: Prognostic factors for decision making. International Journal of Surgery, 20, 58–64. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Camilleri M. (2015). Bile acid diarrhea: Prevelance, pathogenesis, and therapy. Gut Liver, 9(3), 332–339. 10.5009/gnl14397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caplin M. E., Pavel M., Ćwikła J. B., Phan A. T., Raderer M., Sedláčková E.,…Ruszniewski P. (2014). Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(3), 224–233. 10.1056/NEJMoa1316158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chadha M. K., Lombardo J., Mashtare T., Wilding G. E., Litwin A., Raczyk C.,…Iyer R. V. (2009). High-dose octreotide acetate for management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Anticancer Research, 29(10), 4127–4130. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19846960 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choti M. A., Bobiak S., Strosberg J. R., Benson A. B., Bloomston M., Yao Y. C.,…Shah M. H. (2012). Prevalence of functional tumors in neuroendocrine carcinoma: An analysis from the NCCN NET database [Abstract 4126]. Journal of Clinical Oncology (ASCO Annual Meeting Abstracts), 30(15_suppl). 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4126 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Creutzfeldt W. (1996). Carcinoid tumors: Development of our knowledge. World Journal of Surgery, 20(2), 126–131. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8661807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dasari A., Shen C., Halperin D., Zhao B., Zhou S., Xu Y.,…Yao J. C. (2017). Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncology, 3(10), 1335–1342. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dimitriadis G. K., Weickert M. O., Randeva H. S., Kaltsas G., & Grossman A. (2016). Medical management of secretory syndromes related to gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Endocrine-Related Cancer, 23(9), R423–R436. 10.1530/ERC-16-0200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher G. A., Wolin E. M., Liyanage N., Lowenthal S. P., Mirakhur B., Pommier R. F.,…Vinik A. I. (2018a). Lanreotide therapy in carcinoid syndrome: Prospective analysis of patient-reported symptoms in patients responsive to prior octreotide therapy and patients naïve somatostatin analogue therapy in the ELECT phase 3 study. Endocrine Practice, 24(3), 243–255. 10.4158/EP172000.OR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher G. A. Jr., Wolin E. M., Liyanage N., Lowenthal S. P., Mirakhur B., Pommier R. F.,…Vinik A. (2018b). Patient-reported symptom control of diarrhea and flushing in patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with lanreotide depot/autogel: Results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind and 32-week open-label study. The Oncologist, 23(1), 16–24. 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fröjd C., Larsson G., Lampic C., & von Essen L. (2007). Health related quality of life and psychosocial function among patients with carcinoid tumours. A longitudinal, prospective, and comparative study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5, 18 10.1186/1477-7525-5-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halperin D. M., Shen C., Dasari A., Xu Y., Chu Y., Zhou S.,…Yao J. C. (2017). Frequency of carcinoid syndrome at neuroendocrine tumour diagnosis: A population-based study. Lancet Oncology, 18(4), 525–534. 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30110-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hess G. P., Chen C.-C., Liu Z., Yao J. C., Phan A. T., & Hill J. W. (2012). Clinical burden of illness in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas, 41(7), 1058–1062. 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318249d8f7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ipsen Pharmaceuticals. (2014). Somatuline depot (lanreotide) injection package insert. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/022074s011lbl.pdf [Google Scholar]
- Ipsen Pharmaceuticals. (2017). Xermelo (250-mg coated tablets) summary of product characteristics. Retrieved from https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/product-information/xermelo-epar-product-information_en.pdf
- Isenberg-Grzeda E., Macgregor M., Matsoukas K., Reidy-Lagunes D., & Alici Y. (2017). Antidepressant use in patients with carcinoid tumors: Results of a systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 97, 154–155. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.03.252 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ito T., Lee L., & Jensen R. (2018). Carcinoid-syndrome: Recent advances, current status and controversies. Current Opinion in Endocrinology & Diabetes and Obesity, 25(1), 22–35. 10.1097/MED.0000000000000376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kulke M. H., Hörsch D., Caplin M. E., Anthony L. B., Bergsland E., Öberg K.,…Pavel M. (2017). Telotristat ethyl, a tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor for the treatment of carcinoid syndrome. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(1), 14–23. 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence B., Gustafsson B. I., Chan A., Svejda B., Kidd M., & Modlin I. M. (2011). The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, 40(1), 1–18. 10.1016/j.ecl.2010.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee S. Y., Cheow P. C., Teo J. Y., & Ooi L. L. P. J. (2012). Surgical treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases. International Journal of Hepatology, 2012, Article ID 146590 10.1155/2012/146590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2017). Xermelo (telotristat ethyl) package insert. Retrieved from https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/fda/fdaDrugXsl.cfm?setid=f11c21f8-f725-445e-b38e-1e4c5b05bcc6&type=display [Google Scholar]
- Lips C. J. M., Lentjes E. G. W. M., & Höppener J. W. M. (2003). The spectrum of carcinoid tumours and carcinoid syndromes. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 40(Pt 6), 612–627. 10.1258/000456303770367207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Modlin I. M., Latich I., Kidd M., Zikusoka M., & Eick G. (2006). Therapeutic options for gastrointestinal carcinoids. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 4(5), 526–547. 10.1016/j.cgh.2005.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molina-Cerrillo J., Alonso-Gordoa T., Martínez-Sáez O., & Grande E. (2016). Inhibition of peripheral synthesis of serotonin as a new target in neuroendocrine tumors. The Oncologist, 21(6), 701–707. 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mota J. M., Sousa L. G., & Riechelmann R. P. (2016). Complications from carcinoid syndrome: Review of the current evidence. Ecancermedicalscience, 10, 662 10.3332/ecancer.2016.662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2018). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors. V2.2018. Retrieved from https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/neuroendocrine.pdf [Google Scholar]
- NETs Northwood. (2012). The five E’s of carcinoid & neuroendocrine cancers. Retrieved from http://www.northwoodsnets.org/newly-diagnosed/the-five-es-of-carcinoid-and-neuroendocrine-cancers/ [Google Scholar]
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp (2008). Sandostatin LAR (octreotide acetate for injectable suspension) package insert. Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2008/021008s021lbl.pdf [Google Scholar]
- Oncology Nursing Society. (2015). Survivorship care standards for accreditation. Retrieved from https://www.ons.org/standards-and-reports/survivorship-care-standards-accreditation [Google Scholar]
- Oncology Nursing Society Voice. (2018). Creating and sustaining survivorship care plans in practice. Retrieved from https://voice.ons.org/news-and-views/survivorship-care-plans-in-practice. [Google Scholar]
- Pasieka J. L., Longman R. S., Chambers A., Rorstad O., Rach-Longman K., & Dixon E. (2014). Cognitive impairment associated with carcinoid syndrome. Annals of Surgery, 259(2), 355–359. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318288ff6d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pavel M., Gross D. J., Benavent M., Perros P., Srirajaskanthan R., Warner R. R. P.,…Garcia-Carbonero R. (2018). Telotristat ethyl in carcinoid syndrome: Safety and efficacy in the TELECAST phase 3 trial. Endocrine-Related Cancer, 25(3), 309–322. 10.1530/ERC-17-0455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearman T. P., Beaumont J. L., Cella D., Neary M. P., & Yao J. (2016). Health-related quality of life in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: an investigation of treatment type, disease status, and symptom burden. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24(9), 3695–3703. 10.1007/s00520-016-3189-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phan A. T., Wolin E. M., Liyanage N., Mirakhur B., Lowenthal S. W. P., Vinik A. I.,…Pavel M. E. (2017). Elevated levels of 5-HIAA and CgA in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs): Analyses from the CLARINET study. Abstract presented at the 2017 North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS) annual meeting. Abstract #C-16. [Google Scholar]
- Ricci S., Antonuzzo A., Galli L., Ferdeghini M., Bodei L., Orlandini C.,…Conte P. F. (2000). Octreotide acetate long-acting release in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors pretreated with lanreotide. Annals of Oncology, 11(9), 1127–1130. 10.1023/A:1008383132024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riechelmann R. P., Pereira A. A., Rego J. F. M., & Costa F. P. (2017). Refractory carcinoid syndrome: A review of treatment options. Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology, 9(2), 127–137. 10.1177/1758834016675803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rinke A., Müller H.-H., Schade-Brittinger C., Klose K.-J., Barth P., Wied M.,…Arnold R. (2009). Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide LAR in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: A report from the PROMID Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(28), 4656–4663. 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sandhu S., & Jialal I. (2018). ViPoma. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507698/ [PubMed]
- Singh S., Granberg D., Wolin E., Warner R., Sissons M., Kolarova T.,…Leyden J. (2017). Patient-reported burden of a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) diagnosis: Results from the first global survey of patients with NETs. Journal of Global Oncology, 3(1), 43–53. 10.1200/JGO.2015.002980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strosberg J. R., Benson A. B., Huynh L., Duh M. S., Goldman J., Sahai V.,…Kulke M. H. (2014). Clinical benefits of above-standard dose of octreotide LAR in patients with neuroendocrine tumors for control of carcinoid syndrome symptoms: A multicenter retrospective chart review study. The Oncologist, 19(9), 930–936. 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strosberg J. R. (2017a). Clinical characteristics of well-differentiated neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumors arising in the tubular digestive tract, lung, and genitourinary tract. Retrieved from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-characteristics-of-well-differentiated-neuroendocrine-carcinoid-tumors-arising-in-the-tubular-digestive-tract-lung-and-genitourinary-tract [Google Scholar]
- Strosberg J., Halfdanarson T., Bellizzi A., Chan J., Dillon J., Heaney A.,…Bergsland E. (2017b). The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors. Pancreas, 46(6), 707–714. 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tsoukalas N., Chatzellis E., Rontogianni D., Alexandraki K., Boutzios G., Angelousi A., & Kaltsas G. (2017). Pancreatic carcinoids (serotonin-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms): Report of 5 cases and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore), 96(16), e6201. 10.1097/MD.0000000000006201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Lely A. J., & de Herder W. W. (2005). Carcinoid syndrome: Diagnosis and medical management. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia & Metabologia, 49(5), 850–860. 10.1590/S0004-27302005000500028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- von der Ohe M. R., Camilleri M., Kvols L. K., & Thomforde G. M. (1993). Motor dysfunction of the small bowel and colon in patients with the carcinoid syndrome and diarrhea. New England Journal of Medicine, 329(15), 1073–1078. 10.1056/NEJM199310073291503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vinik A. I., Woltering E. A., Warner R. R., Caplin M., O’Dorisio T. M., Wiseman G. A.,...Go V. L. (2010). NANETS consensus guidelines for the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas, 39(6), 713–734. 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181ebaffd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weickert M. O., Kaltsas G., Hörsch D., Lapuerta P., Pavel M., Valle J. W.,…Kulke M. H. (2017). Association of weight change with telotristat ethyl in the treatment of carcinoid syndrome [Abstract e15692]. Journal of Clinical Oncology (ASCO Annual Meeting Abstracts), 35(15_suppl). 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.e15692 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wolin E. M., Leyden J., Goldstein G., Kolarova T., Hollander R., & Warner R. (2017). Patient-reported experience of diagnosis, management, and burden of neuroendocrine tumors: Results from a large patient survey in the United States. Pancreas, 46(5), 639–647. 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yadegarfar G., Friend L., Jones L., Plum L. M., Ardill J., Taal B.,…Ramage J. K. (2013). Validation of the EORTC QLQ-GINET21 questionnaire for assessing quality of life of patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours. British Journal of Cancer, 108(2), 301–310. 10.1038/bjc.2012.560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zandee W. T., van Adrichem R. C., Kamp K., Feelders R. A., van Velthuysen M.-L. F., & de Herder W. W. (2017). Incidence and prognostic value of serotonin secretion in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Clinical Endocrinology, 87(2), 165–170. 10.1111/cen.13364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]