Skip to main content
PMC home page
Atencion Primaria logoLink to Atencion Primaria
. 2013 Apr 5;29(6):378–384. [Article in Spanish] doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(02)70587-8

La evaluación de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en la consulta: las viñetas COOP/WONCA

L Lizán Tudela a,*, A Reig Ferrer b
PMCID: PMC7669103  PMID: 11996720

The content is available as a PDF (353.4 KB).

Bibliografía

  • 1.Meyboom-de Jong B., Smith R.J.A. How do we classify functional status? Fam Med. 1992;24:128–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Van Weel C. Functional status in primary care: COOP/WONCA charts. Disability and Rehabilitation. 1993;15:96–101. doi: 10.3109/09638289309165878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McHorney C.A. Generic health measurement: past accomplishments and a measurement Paradigm for the 21st century. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:743–750. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McHorney C.A., Tarlov A.R. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Res. 1995;4:293–307. doi: 10.1007/BF01593882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dolan P. Valuing health-related quality of life. Issues and controversies. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;15:119–127. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915020-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Testa M.A., Simonson D.C. Assessment of quality of life outcomes. N Eng J Med. 1996;334:835–840. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199603283341306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anderson R.T., Aaronson N.K., Wilkin D. Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life: generic instruments. In: Shumaker S.A., Berzon R., editors. Quality of life: theory, translation, measurement & analysis. Rapid Comunications of Oxford Ltd.; Oxford: 1995. pp. 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nelson E.C., Landgraf J.M., Hays R.D., Wasson J.H., Kirk J.W. The functional status of patients. How can it be measured in physicians´ offices? Med Care. 1990;28:1111–1126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nelson E.C., Wasson J.H., Kirk J.W. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice. Description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:55. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9681(87)80033-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Scholten J.H.G., Van Weel C. Functional status assessment in family practice. The Darmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCA. Meditekst; Lelystad: 1992. pp. 17–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lizán Tudela L., Reig Ferrer A. Adaptación transcultural de una medida de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud: la versión española de las viñetas COOP/WONCA. Aten Primaria. 1999;24:75–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Meyboom-de Jong B., Smith R.J.A. Studies with the Darmouth COOP charts in general practice: comparison with the Nottingham health profile and the general health questionnaire. In: Lipkin M. Jr, editor. Functional status measurement in primary care. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1990. pp. 132–149. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bruusgaard D., Nessioy I., Rutle O., Furuseth K., Natvig B. Measuring functional status in a population survey. The Darmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCA used in a epidemiological study. Family Practice. 1993;10:212–218. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.2.212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Essink-Bot M.L., Van Royen L., Krabbe P., Bonsel G., Rutten F. The impact of migraine on health status. Headache. 1995;35:200–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3504200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Larson C.O., Hays R.D., Nelson E.C. Do the pictures influence scores on the Darmouth COOP Charts? Quality of Life Res. 1992;1:247–249. doi: 10.1007/BF00435633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kempen G.I., Van Sonderen E., Sanderman R. Measuring health status with the Darmouth COOP charts in low-functioning elderly. Do the illustrations affect the outcomes? Qual Life Res. 1997;6:323–328. doi: 10.1023/a:1018427225299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Perneger T.V., Chamot E., Etter J.F., Richard J.L., Gallant S., Ricciardi P. Assessment of the COOP charts with and without pictures in a Swiss population. Qual Life Res. 2000;9:405–414. doi: 10.1023/a:1008965321161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nelson E.C., Landgraf J.M., Hays R.D., Kirk J.W., Wasson J.H., Keller A. The COOP function chart: a system to measure patient function in physicians´ offices. In: Lipkin Jr M., editor. Functional status measurement in primary care. Springer-Verlag; New York: 1990. pp. 97–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lk Lam C., Van Weel C., Lauder I. Can the Darmouth COOP/WONCA charts be used to assess the functional status of chinese patients? Family Practice. 1994;11:85–94. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.1.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Van Weel C. Functional status in primary care: COOP/WONCA charts. Disability and Rehabilitation. 1993;15:96–101. doi: 10.3109/09638289309165878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lizán Tudela L., Reig Ferrer A., Richart Martínez M., Cabrero García J. Evaluación de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud mediante las láminas COOP/WONCA. Med Clin (Barc) 2000;114(Supl 3):76–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Coons S.J., Rao S., Keininger D.L., Hays R.D. A comparative review of generic quality of life instruments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17:13–35. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017010-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lizán Tudela L., Reig Ferrer A., Uris Sellés J., Crespo Tudela M.J. La versión española del cuestionario de salud COOP/WONCA: estudio de validez aparente. Aten Primaria. 1996;8(Supl 1):374. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lizán L., Reig A., Ayala M.A. La versión española del cuestionario de salud COOP/WONCA: matriz multirrasgo multimétodo. Aten Primaria. 1997;20:219. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Siu A.L., Hays R.D., Ouslander J.G., Osterwell D., Valdez R.G., Krynski M. Measuring functioning and health in the very old. J Gerontol. 1993;1:10–14. doi: 10.1093/geronj/48.1.m10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Coates A.K., Wilkin D. Comparing the Nottingham Health Profile with the Darmouth COOP Charts. In: Scholten J.H.G., Van Weel C., editors. Functional status assessment in family practice. Meditekst; The Darmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCA. Lelystad: 1992. pp. 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bruusgaard D., Nessioy I., Rutle O., Furuseth K., Natvig B. Measuring functional status in a population survey. The Darmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCA used in an epidemiological study. Family Practice. 1993;10:212–218. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.2.212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lk Lam C., Lauder I.J. The impact of chronic diseases on the health-related quality of life of Chinese patients in primary care. Family Practice. 2000;17:159–166. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kaplan R.M., Alcaraz J.E., Anderson J.P., Weisman M. Quality-adjusted life years lost to arthritis: effects of gender, race, and social class. Arthritis Care Res. 1996;9:473–482. doi: 10.1002/art.1790090609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Glasgow R.E., Ruggiero L., Eakin E.G., Dryfoos J., Chobanian L. Quality of life and associated characteristics in a large national sample of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:562–567. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.4.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lizán Tudela L., Reig Ferrer A. Perspectiva del paciente en la evaluación de resultados en atención primaria: la medida de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud. Cuadernos de Gestión para el Profesional de Atención Primaria. 1998;4:119–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Patterson W.M. Peak expiratory flow rates and functional status in asthma. In: Scholten J.H.G., Van Weel C., editors. Functional status assessment in family practice. The Darmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCA. Meditekst; Lelystad: 1992. p. 74. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Van Weel C., Matteysen N., Wong Chung D., Revell L., West S.R. Change in functional status following an asthma exacerbation. In: Scholten J.H.G., Van Weel C., editors. Functional status assessment in family practice. The Darmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCA. Meditekst; Lelystad: 1992. p. 75. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bruusgaard D., Nessioy I., Rutle O., Furuseth K., Natvig B. Measuring functional status in a population survey. The Darmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCA used in a epidemiological study. Family Practice. 1993;10:212–218. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.2.212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ferreira P.L., Rosete M.L. Validation of the pregnancy COOP charts in Portugal. Qual Life Res. 1995;4:426. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Landgraf J.M., Nelson E.C., the Darmouth COOP Primary Care Network Summary of the WONCA/COOP International Health Assessment Field Trial. Australian Family Physician. 1992;21:255–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kinnersley P., Peters T., Stott N. Measuring functional helth status in primary care using the COOP/WONCA charts: acceptability, range of scores, construct validity, reliability and sensivity to change. Br J Gen Pract. 1994;44:545–549. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lizán L., Reig A., Bartolomé B., Moro J.J., Sancho A. The Spanish version of the COOP/WONCA charts: self-assessed quality of life in different populations Quality of Life Research. 1999;8:637. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.García Olmos L., Miranda C., Barrios M., Arias P., Ogando B., Villegas M.V. Medición de la capacidad funcional, con las láminas COOP-WONCA, en una población anciana. Aten Primaria. 1994;13:233–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Quartero A.O., Post M.W.M., Numans M.E., De Melker R.A., De Wit N.J. What makes the dyspeptic patient feel ill? A cross sectional survey of functional helth status, Helicobacter pylori infection, and psychological distress in dyspeptic patients in general practice. Gut. 1999;45:15–19. doi: 10.1136/gut.45.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bronfort G., Bouter L.M. Responsiveness of general health status in chronic low back pain: a comparison of the COOP charts and the SF-36. Pain. 1999;83:201–209. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00103-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Essink-Bot M.L., Van Royen L., Krabbe P., Bonsel G., Rutten F. The impact of migraine on health status. Headache. 1995;35:200–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1995.hed3504200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jenkinson C., Jenkinson D., Shepperd S., Layte R., Petersen S. Evaluation of treatment for congestive heart failure in patients aged 60 years and older using generic measures of health status (SF-36 and COOP charts) Age and Ageing. 1997;26:7–13. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Krousel-Wood M.A., Re R.N. Health status assessment in a hypertension section of an internal medicine clinic. Am J Med Sci. 1994;308:211–217. doi: 10.1097/00000441-199430840-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.De Grauw W.J., Van de Lisdonk E.H., Van Gerwn W.H., Van den Hoogen H.J., Van Weel C. Insulin therapy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients: does it affect quality of life? Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51:527–532. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Unal G., De Boer J.B., Borsboom G.J., Brouwer J.T., Essink-Bot M., Man R.A. A psychometric comparison of health-related quality of life measures in chronic liver disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54:587–596. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00372-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Doetch T.M., Alger B.H., Glasser M., Levenstein J. Detecting depression in elderly outpatients: finding from depression symptom scales and the Darmouth COOP charts. Fam Med. 1994;26:519–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lane D., Carroll D., Ring C., Beevers G., Lip G.Y.H. Mortality and quality of life 12 months after myocardial infarction: effects of depression and anxiety. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2001;63:221–230. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200103000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sneeuw K.C.A., Aaronson N.K., Sprangers M.A.G., Detmar S.B., Wever L.D.V., Schornagel J.H. Evaluating the quality of life of cancer patients: assessments by patients, significant others, physicians and nurses. Br J cancer. 1999;81:87–94. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Grant C., Goodenough T., Harvey I., Hine C. A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a referrals facilitator between primary care and the voluntary sector. BMJ. 2000;320:419–423. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7232.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Harvey I., Nelson S.J., Lyons R.A., Unwin C., Monaghan S., Ppeters T.J. A randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation of counselling in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 1998;48:1043–1048. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jenkinson C., Lawrence K., McWhinnie D., Gordon J. Sensivity to change of helth status measures in a randomized controlled trial: comparison of the COOP charts and the SF-36. Qual Life Res. 1995;4:47–52. doi: 10.1007/BF00434383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Becchi M.A., Franzelli A., Moscardelli S., De Pieri P., Zeni L., Paccagnella B. La diagnosi multidimensionale in medicina generale. Minerva Med. 1994;85:521–529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Holmes A.M., Parchman M.L., Bang H. Patient preference for health status screening instruments. Family practice. 1995;12:88–92. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.1.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Alonso J. La medida de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en la investigación y la práctica clínica. Gac Sanit. 2000;12:163–167. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(00)71450-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Atencion Primaria are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES