Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69785-3, published online 30 July 2020
The original version of this Article contained errors in the Abstract.
“Antenatal magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) treatment is widely used for fetal neuroprotection in women at risk of preterm delivery. However, some studies have recently suggested that in utero MgSO4 exposure is associated with an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). This study aimed to investigate the association between antenatal MgSO4 treatment and risk of NEC. This retrospective cohort study included 756 infants born at 24‒31 weeks’ gestation. Subjects were classified into three groups: period 1, when MgSO4 treatment protocol for fetal neuroprotection was not adopted (n = 267); period 2, when the protocol was adopted (n = 261); and period 3, when the protocol was withdrawn because of concern of risk of NEC (n = 228). Rates of NEC (≥ stage 2b) were analyzed according to time period and exposure to antenatal MgSO4. Significant difference in the rate of NEC was not found across the three time periods (2.6% vs. 6.5% vs. 4.8% in periods 1, 2 and 3, respectively, p = 0.103). The rate of NEC was comparable between the infants exposed and unexposed to antenatal MgSO4 (5.1% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.369). These results showed that antenatal MgSO4 treatment was not associated with risk of NEC in our study population.’’
now reads:
“Antenatal magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) treatment is widely used for fetal neuroprotection in women at risk of preterm delivery. However, some studies have recently suggested that in utero MgSO4 exposure is associated with an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). This study aimed to investigate the association between antenatal MgSO4 treatment and risk of NEC. This retrospective cohort study included 756 infants born at 24‒31 weeks’ gestation. Subjects were classified into three groups: period 1, when MgSO4 treatment protocol for fetal neuroprotection was not adopted (n = 267); period 2, when the protocol was adopted (n = 261); and period 3, when the protocol was withdrawn because of concern of risk of NEC (n = 228). Rates of NEC (≥ stage 2b) were analyzed according to time period and exposure to antenatal MgSO4. Significant difference in the rate of NEC was not found across the three time periods (2.6% vs. 6.5% vs. 4.8% in periods 1, 2 and 3, respectively, p = 0.103). The rate of NEC was comparable between the infants unexposed and exposed to antenatal MgSO4 (5.1% vs. 3.6%, p = 0.369). These results showed that antenatal MgSO4 treatment was not associated with risk of NEC in our study population.’’
These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.