Skip to main content
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease logoLink to Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
. 2020 Jun 20;9(13):e014933. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014933

Body Fat Distribution, Overweight, and Cardiac Structures in School‐Age Children: A Population‐Based Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Liza Toemen 1,2, Susana Santos 1,2, Arno A Roest 4, Gavro Jelic 1, Aad van der Lugt 3, Janine F Felix 1, Willem A Helbing 2,3, Romy Gaillard 1,2, Vincent W V Jaddoe 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7670529  PMID: 32567454

Abstract

Background

Adiposity is associated with larger left ventricular mass in children and adults. The role of body fat distribution in these associations is not clear. We examined the associations of body fat distribution and overweight with cardiac measures obtained by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in school‐age children.

Methods and Results

In a population‐based cohort study including 2836 children, 10 years of age, we used anthropometric measures, dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry, and magnetic resonance imaging to collect information on body mass index, lean mass index, fat mass index, and abdominal visceral adipose tissue index. Indexes were standardized by height. Cardiac measures included right and left ventricular end‐diastolic volume, left ventricular mass, and mass‐to‐volume ratio as a marker for concentricity. All body fat measures were positively associated with right and left ventricular end‐diastolic volumes and left ventricular mass, with the strongest associations for lean mass index (all P<0.05). Obese children had a 1.12 standard deviation score (95% CI, 0.94–1.30) larger left ventricular mass and a 0.35 standard deviation score (95% CI, 0.14–0.57) higher left ventricular mass‐to‐volume ratio than normal weight children. Conditional on body mass index, higher lean mass index was associated with higher right and left ventricular end‐diastolic volume and left ventricular mass, whereas higher fat mass measures were inversely associated with these cardiac measures (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

Higher childhood body mass index is associated with a larger right and left ventricular size. This association is influenced by higher lean mass. In childhood, lean mass may be a stronger determinant of heart growth than fat mass. Fat mass may influence cardiac structures at older ages.

Keywords: cardiac MRI, epidemiology, obesity, pediatrics

Subject Categories: Epidemiology, Obesity, Pediatrics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)


Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

BMI

body mass index

cMRI

cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

LMVR

left ventricular mass‐to‐volume ratio

LVEDV

left ventricular end‐diastolic volume

LVEF

left ventricular ejection fraction

LVM

left ventricular mass

RVEDV

right ventricular end‐diastolic volume

RVEF

right ventricular ejection fraction

SDS

standard deviation score

Clinical Perspective

What Is New?

  • Obese children have higher left ventricular mass and left ventricular mass‐to‐volume ratio than normal‐weight children.

  • Lean mass index is associated with relatively larger left and right cardiac measures.

  • Fat mass index is associated with relatively smaller left and right cardiac measures.

What Are the Clinical Implications?

  • In childhood, lean mass may be a stronger determinant of cardiac growth.

  • Fat mass may may influence cardiac structure at later ages.

Overweight and obesity are strongly associated with cardiovascular disease in adults.1 Previous studies suggested that cardiac adaptations in response to overweight start already in childhood.2 Higher childhood body mass index (BMI) is associated with adult left ventricular remodeling and larger left ventricular mass (LVM).2 Left ventricular remodeling is generally categorized in eccentric and concentric remodeling. Eccentric remodeling, an increase in both left ventricular mass and volume, is associated with heart failure.3 Concentric remodeling, in which the mass‐to‐volume ratio is increased, is also associated with stroke and coronary heart disease.3 Concentric remodeling is, in general, thought to be caused by hypertension, but is also observed in obesity, independent of blood pressure.4 Obesity is a condition associated with different and heterogeneous cardiovascular outcomes.5 This may be because obesity is based on BMI, which does not distinguish between lean mass, subcutaneous fat mass, and visceral fat mass. The important role of body fat distribution is reflected by studies showing that visceral adipose tissue is more strongly associated with metabolic syndrome and hypertension than subcutaneous adipose tissue.6 Body composition and, more specifically, fat distribution may also affect cardiac structure. Studies focused on body composition instead of BMI suggest that lean body mass is more strongly related to LVM than BMI or fat mass in adults.7 Also, adiposity around the hips was associated with eccentric remodeling characterized by an increase in LVM and left ventricular end‐diastolic volume (LVEDV), whereas central obesity was associated with concentric remodeling characterized by an increase in left ventricular mass‐to‐volume ratio (LMVR).8 We have previously reported that body fat distribution was associated with cardiovascular risk factors in childhood.9 To our knowledge, no studies have examined the associations of detailed general and abdominal adiposity measures with both right and left ventricular measures in childhood. Insight into the possible associations between body composition beyond BMI and cardiac measures in childhood could give clues to the primordial origins of cardiac disease.

We hypothesized that general and abdominal body fat distribution influence right and left cardiac measures from childhood onward. Therefore, in a population‐based study among 2836 school‐aged children, we examined the associations of general and abdominal body fat measures and being overweight with right and left ventricular structure and function based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI).

Methods

Data, analytical methods, and study materials will not be made available to other researchers for purposes of reproducing the results or replicating the procedure.

Design and Study Population

This study was embedded in the Generation R Study, a population‐based, prospective cohort study from fetal life onward in Rotterdam, The Netherlands.10 Response rate at birth was 61% (2002–2006).10 Child ethnicity was classified by country of parents’ birth, categorized as Dutch or non‐Dutch.10 The largest non‐Dutch ethnicities are European, Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese, Cape Verdian, and Dutch Antilles. The children's sex was obtained from midwife and hospital registries at birth. Childhood BMI, body composition, and cardiac measures were assessed during 2 visits at 10 years of age. Median time difference between the 2 visits was 1.1 (95% CI, 0–24.8) months. In total, 4135 singleton born children participated in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. We obtained good‐quality cMRI scans in 2836 children without cardiac abnormalities (see flowchart in Figure S1). Written informed consent was obtained from all parents of study participants. The study was approved by the local medical ethics committee.

General and Abdominal Body Fat Distribution Assessments

Trained staff at a dedicated research center measured the children's height and weight at 9.9 (95% CI, 9.5–11.8) years of age, according to specific research protocols. BMI (kg/m2) and body surface area were calculated.11 We obtained sex‐ and age‐specific BMI standard deviation scores (SDSs) based on Dutch reference growth curves.12 Childhood overweight status was defined according to age‐ and sex‐specific cutoff points.13

Total body and regional fat and lean mass were measured using a dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry scanner (iDXA; GE‐Lunar, 2008, Madison, WI) and analyzed using enCORE software version 12.6.14 We divided total fat mass by height4 to obtain a fat mass index uncorrelated with height, as confirmed by a log–log regression analysis.15 Lean body mass was divided by height squared to obtain lean mass index. Correlations between general and specific body composition measures are presented in Table S1.

Visceral fat was obtained by MRI, as described previously, and in Data S1.10, 16 IDEAL IQ and LavaFlex acquisitions were used to obtain abdominal fat imaging. These were analyzed by Precision Image Analysis (Precision Image Analysis, Kirkland, WA) using sliceOmatic (TomoVision, Magog, QC, Canada) software. The visceral adipose tissue index uncorrelated with height was calculated as visceral adipose tissue / height3.15

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

As described previously, we acquired localizer images, followed by ECG gated breath‐hold scans for 2 and 4‐chamber views.17 A short‐axis steady‐state free precession cine stack was then obtained over several end‐expiration breath‐holds. Offline image analyses were performed by Precision Image Analysis using QMASS software (Medis, Leiden, The Netherlands), following the guidelines of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.18 Papillary muscle was included in the ventricular cavity. Cardiac measurements included right ventricular end‐diastolic volume (RVEDV), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), LVEDV, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and LVM. We calculated LMVR as LVM/LVEDV, as a marker of concentric remodeling. We also obtained stroke volume and cardiac output. We used systemic vascular resistance as a proxy for afterload, which was calculated as mean arterial pressure divided by cardiac output. We added this measure to explore the associations between body composition and afterload, which may explain how adiposity is associated with cardiac remodeling through changes in cardiac hemodynamics and wall stress.

Blood Pressure Measurements

Childhood systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured on the right brachial artery 4 times using a validated automatic sphygmomanometer (Accutorr Plus; Datascope, Fairfield, NJ). Mean values of the last 3 measurements were used in our analyses. Mean arterial pressure was calculated as 1/3 × systolic blood pressure + 2/3 × diastolic blood pressure.19

Statistical Analysis

First, we compared childhood characteristics between different childhood weight categories using one‐way analysis of variance, Mann–Whitney U test, and chi‐square test. Second, we used linear regression models to assess the associations of childhood general and abdominal body fat measures (BMI, lean mass index, fat mass index, and visceral adipose tissue index) with cardiac measures (RVEDV, RVEF, LVEDV, LVEF, LVM, LMVR, stroke volume, and systemic vascular resistance). Basic models were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and time difference between the 2 visits. A second model was also adjusted for childhood blood pressure (blood pressure model). We used similar models to assess the associations of childhood overweight with LVM and LMVR. We created SDSs according to (observed value − mean) / SD, for all determinants and outcomes, to enable comparison of effect estimates. We did not observe a significant statistical interaction between child sex and being overweight or body composition in relation to cardiac measures. Finally, we used conditional regression analyses to assess whether the associations of general and abdominal body fat measures with cardiac outcomes were statistically independent of BMI.20 For these models, we regressed each of the body composition measures on BMI to create standardized residuals, independent of BMI (scatterplots before and after residualization are shown in Figure S2). This approach enables analyses of body composition measures independent of BMI in relation to cardiac outcomes.9, 20 Because our outcomes are correlated, we considered Bonferroni correction for multiple testing too strict; in Table 2, we specify P<0.01 or P<0.05. Missing data of covariates were imputed using multiple imputations. Five data sets were created and analyzed together.21 For multiple imputation, we used Fully Conditional Specification, an iterative of the Markov‐chain Monte Carlo approach. For each variable, the fully conditional specification method fits a model using all other available variables in the model as predictors, and then imputes missing values for the specific variable being fit.21 In the imputation model, we included all covariates. Furthermore, we also added the studied determinants and outcomes in the imputation model as prediction variables only; they were not imputed themselves.22 These analyses were performed using the SPSS version 21.0 for Windows (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY).

Results

Subject Characteristics

Overweight and obese children had higher lean mass index, fat mass index, visceral adipose tissue index, and blood pressure than normal‐weight children (Table 1). Also, cardiac volume, mass, mass‐to‐volume ratio, and stroke volume were highest in obese children. RVEF was lower in overweight and obese children, but no difference was observed for LVEF. Systemic vascular resistance was lowest in obese children.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Children in the Study

Underweight, N=189 (6.7%) Normal Weight, N=2149 (75.8%) Overweight, N=412 (14.5%) Obese, N=86 (3.0%) P Valuea
Age at magnetic resonance imaging, y 9.9 (9.4–11.8) 9.9 (9.5–11.8) 10.0 (9.5–11.8) 9.9 (9.5–11.7) 0.74
Male sex, N 99 (52.4) 1064 (49.5) 173 (42.0) 37 (43.0) 0.02
Non‐Dutch ethnicity, N 71 (38.4) 728 (34.6) 226 (56.1) 56 (67.5) <0.01
Height, cm 140.0 (7.1) 141.1 (6.4) 144.1 (6.9) 145.0 (6.6) <0.01
Weight, kg 27.6 (22.2–34.7) 33.0 (26.0–43.4) 44.0 (35.2–56.8) 53.2 (43.2–72.3) <0.01
Body mass index, kg/m2 14.2 (12.7–14.9) 16.6 (14.7–19.4) 21.1 (19.6–23.8) 25.1 (23.7–31.1) <0.01
Body surface area, m2 1.02 (0.88–1.20) 1.13 (0.97–1.36) 1.33 (1.14–1.58) 1.48 (1.27–1.81) <0.01
Lean mass index, kg/m2 10.6 (9.0–11.8) 11.8 (10.2–13.6) 12.8 (11.3–14.7) 13.8 (11.4–16.3) <0.01
Lean mass, kg 20.8 (15.8–26.1) 23.4 (18.2–30.2) 26.4 (20.4–33.7) 29.2 (23.0–37.5) <0.01
Fat mass index, kg/m4 1.43 (1.01–2.40) 2.04 (1.20–3.46) 3.69 (2.40–5.19) 5.02 (3.51–6.97) <0.01
Fat mass, kg 5.5 (3.6–8.3) 8.0 (4.7–13.9) 15.7 (10.2–22.5) 22.3 (15.5–34.5) <0.01
Visceral adipose tissue index, g/m3 0.09 (0.05–0.17) 0.12 (0.06–0.25) 0.21 (0.09–0.40) 0.26 (0.12–0.53) <0.01
Visceral adipose tissue, g 244 (133–496) 337 (162–696) 600 (266–1206) 853 (357–1648) <0.01
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 99.1 (7.2) 102.4 (7.4) 107.3 (7.7) 112.3 (8.9) <0.01
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 57.4 (6.3) 58.5 (6.3) 59.4 (6.2) 61.5 (7.6) <0.01
Right ventricular end‐diastolic volume, mL 87.9 (15.7) 98.7 (18.5) 110.0 (21.3) 114.5 (19.8) <0.01
Right ejection fraction, % 58.6 (5.2) 58.3 (4.9) 57.5 (4.7) 57.6 (4.4) <0.01
Left ventricular end‐diastolic volume, mL 88.3 (14.0) 99.2 (16.5) 109.3 (19.3) 115.1 (18.7) <0.01
Left ventricular ejection fraction, % 58.6 (4.6) 58.4 (4.6) 58.4 (4.6) 58.3 (4.7) 0.97
Left ventricular mass, g 42.5 (9.1) 48.2 (9.8) 54.3 (9.9) 59.0 (11.0) <0.01
Left ventricular mass‐to‐volume ratio 0.48 (0.08) 0.49 (0.08) 0.50 (0.08) 0.52 (0.08) <0.01
Left ventricular stroke volume, mL 51.6 (9.2) 57.9 (10.2) 63.9 (11.8) 67.0 (11.3) <0.01
Cardiac output, mL/min 3.8 (0.8) 4.2 (0.9) 4.7 (1.0) 5.0 (1.0) <0.01
Heart rate, bpm 74 (13) 73 (13) 74 (12) 75 (12) 0.17
Systemic vascular resistance, mm Hg/min/mL 19.6 (4.0) 18.2 (3.9) 16.9 (4.3) 16.3 (3.7) <0.01

Data expressed as mean (standard deviation), median (95% CI), or number (%), on the basis of original, nonimputed data.

a

Derived from analysis of variance, Mann–Whitney U test, or chi‐square test.

General and Abdominal Body Fat Distribution and Cardiac Measures

BMI was positively associated with RVEDV, LVEDV, and LVM, with the strongest association between BMI and LVEDV (a 1‐SD increase in BMI was associated with 0.41 SDS [95% CI, 0.38–0.44] higher LVEDV) (Table 2). The strength of the association of BMI with LMVR was smaller (difference: 0.07 SDS [95% CI, 0.04–0.11] per increase of 1 SD in BMI). BMI was inversely associated with systemic vascular resistance (difference: −0.20 SDS [95% CI, −0.24 to −0.17]). The associations of lean mass index with all cardiac measures were stronger than those for BMI, and the strongest associations were with LVEDV (difference: 0.51 SDS [95% CI, 0.48–0.54]). Fat mass index and visceral adipose tissue index were also positively associated with RVEDV, LVEDV, LVM, and LMVR, and inversely associated with systemic vascular resistance. Most associations attenuated only slightly after adjustment for blood pressure (Table S2). Associations with RVEF, LVEF, and stroke volume are shown in Table S3. Children with obesity had a 1.12‐SDS (95% CI, 0.94–1.30) higher LVM and a 0.35‐SDS (95% CI, 0.14–0.57) higher LVMR than normal‐weight children (Table S4).

Table 2.

Associations of General and Abdominal Body Fat Mass Measures With Cardiac Measures (N=2836)

Body fat mass measure in SDS Cardiac Measures in SDS
Right Ventricular End‐Diastolic Volume Left Ventricular End‐Diastolic Volume Left Ventricular Mass Left Ventricular Mass‐to‐Volume Ratio Systemic Vascular Resistance
Body mass index 0.39 (0.36–0.42)a 0.41 (0.38– 0.44)a 0.39 (0.36– 0.42)a 0.07 (0.04–0.11)a −0.20 (−0.24 to −0.17)a
Lean mass index 0.50 (0.47–0.53)a 0.51 (0.48– 0.54)a 0.47 (0.44–0.52)a 0.06 (0.02–0.10)a −0.24 (−0.27 to −0.20)a
Fat mass index 0.15 (0.11–0.19)a 0.17 (0.13–0.20)a 0.19 (0.15–0.23)a 0.07 (0.03–0.11)a −0.09 (−0.13 to −0.05)a
Visceral adipose tissue index 0.09 (0.05–0.12)a 0.09 (0.06–0.13)a 0.12 (0.09–0.16)a 0.09 (0.06–0.13)a −0.07 (−0.11 to −0.03)a

Data expressed as linear regression coefficients (95% CI). The estimates represent differences in SDS of the cardiac measures per SDS of childhood general and abdominal body fat measure (determinants). Models are adjusted for child age, sex, ethnicity, and time difference between measurement of body fat mass measures and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Models also adjusted for blood pressure are shown in Table S2. SDS indicates standard deviation score.

a

P<0.01.

Body Fat Distribution and Cardiac Measures

The associations of general and abdominal body fat mass measures with cardiac measures independent of BMI are shown in Figure. Children who had a higher lean mass index had larger RVEDV and LVEDV (all P<0.05; FigurA), whereas those who had a higher fat mass index or visceral adipose tissue index had smaller RVEDV and LVEDV (all P<0.05). Similar results were observed for LVM (FigurB), but no associations were observed with LMVR (FigurB). Children with higher lean mass index had lower systemic vascular resistance, independent of BMI, whereas higher fat mass index or visceral adipose tissue index was associated with higher systemic vascular resistance (FigurC). Higher lean mass index was associated with lower RVEF and LVEF, whereas higher fat mass index and visceral adipose tissue index were associated with higher RVEF and LVEF (all P<0.05; Figure S3).

Figure 1. Associations of general and abdominal body fat mass measures with cardiac measures, independent of body mass index.

Figure 1

A, Represents differences in right and left ventricular end‐diastolic volume per standardized residual change of general or abdominal fat mass measure conditional on body mass index. B, Represents differences in left ventricular mass and left ventricular mass‐to‐volume ratio per standardized residual change of general or abdominal fat mass measure conditional on body mass index. C, Represents differences in systemic vascular resistance per standardized residual change of general or abdominal fat mass measure conditional on body mass index. SDS indicates standard deviation score. Values are expressed as standardized regression coefficients (95% CI) from conditional analyses with body mass index as exposure. The estimates represent the differences in cardiac measures per standardized residual change of general or abdominal fat mass measure conditional on body mass index. Models are adjusted for child age, sex, ethnicity, time difference between measurement of body composition and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and childhood systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

Discussion

In this population‐based cohort study, we observed that overweight and obesity were associated with left and right cardiac measures. General and abdominal fat mass were across their full spectrum associated with higher RVEDV, LVEDV, LVM, and LMVR, and with lower systemic vascular resistance. Obese children have higher LVM and LMVR. The association of higher BMI with larger cardiac measures seems to be driven mainly by the increase in lean mass index.

Interpretation of Main Results

Studies in adults on the associations of adiposity with cardiac structure and function showed that obesity is associated with higher RVEDV, LVEDV, and LVM.23, 24 Obesity or BMI cannot distinguish between lean and adipose body mass, which are both increased in overweight and obese subjects.25, 26 The exact mechanisms that could explain the associations between obesity and cardiac disease remain unclear. An major role seems to be reserved for the cardiometabolic changes associated with obesity and visceral adipose tissue.27 In adults, abdominal fat mass is associated with cardiovascular disease.28 Visceral adiposity, but not subcutaneous adiposity, was found to be associated with LVM and LMVR, independent of weight.27 Another study showed that adiposity of the hip region was associated with eccentric remodeling of the left ventricle, and visceral adiposity was associated with concentric remodeling.8 Thus far, it remains unclear by which mechanisms general and abdominal fat mass affect cardiac structure and function in childhood.

In this cross‐sectional study we have examined the associations of childhood general and abdominal fat mass with cardiac structure and function. We observed that all general and abdominal fat mass measures were associated with larger RVEDV, LVEDV, and LVM, independently of blood pressure. However, independently of BMI, only higher lean mass index was associated with an increase in RVEDV, LVEDV, and LVM, whereas higher fat mass index and visceral adiposity index were associated with lower RVEDV, LVEDV, and LVM. Our results are in line with previous studies suggesting that obesity was associated with increase in LVEDV and LVM in both adults and children.29, 30 One study suggested that lean body mass was the main determinant of LVM in childhood, not total body fat or blood pressure.31 Lean body mass is associated with an increase in blood volume, leading to a higher preload and thus increase in LVM and LVEDV, whereas adipose mass is less metabolically active.32 Thus, the higher RVEDV, LVEDV, and LVM that can be observed in children who are overweight are mainly determined by the increase in lean mass and not by higher fat mass or higher blood pressure.

Measures of concentric remodeling, in which the LMVR is increased, add information additional to left ventricular hypertrophy on prediction of cardiovascular events.3, 33 Concentric remodeling is often thought to be caused by pressure overload and increased wall stress, as observed in individuals with hypertension.34 However, obese individuals have concentric remodeling, independent of blood pressure.35 Concentric remodeling has also been observed in obese children.36 Abdominal adiposity may play a major mechanistic role. A previous study showed that, although increased hip fat in adults was associated with eccentric remodeling, more abdominal fat was associated with concentric remodeling.8 That study also showed that increased hip fat was associated with lower systemic vascular resistance, whereas abdominal fat was associated with relatively higher systemic vascular resistance.8 These varied hemodynamic findings may relate to differences in arterial compliance; central obesity is associated with higher arterial stiffness, whereas hip fat is associated with lower arterial stiffness.8 We also observed lower systemic vascular resistance with increasing BMI, and that both fat mass index and visceral adipose tissue index were associated with relatively higher systemic vascular resistance. However, neither fat mass index nor visceral adipose tissue index was associated with increased LMVR, independently of BMI. When combined, these observations could indicate that hemodynamic changes related to total fat increase afterload and may lead to remodeling later in life. Other mechanisms leading from increased visceral adipose tissue to concentric remodeling may play a role. Visceral adiposity can elicit endocrine and immune responses that affect cardiovascular structure and function directly and through worsening of other cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors.24 A study in adults showed that LMVR was not only associated with abdominal adiposity, but also with insulin resistance and biomarkers of inflammation, independent of BMI.37 Because we did not yet observe an independent association of visceral adipose tissue index with LMVR, it is possible that these changes take place after longer exposure to adverse abdominal fat deposition.

Obesity is not only associated with cardiac structure, but also with function. Studies in adults and children showed changes in strain in obese individuals, indicating subclinical damage, but no changes in RVEF or LVEF were observed.29, 38 In line with these studies, we observed no associations between BMI and LVEF. However, we did observe that BMI was associated with lower RVEF. One other study has reported a relation between childhood body size and lower RVEF.39 A study in adults showed that increased visceral adipose tissue index was associated with lower LVEF.27 In obese adults, especially when sleep apnea is present, the right cardiac function can be affected.4 However, we consider it as unlikely that sleep apnea or pulmonary hypertension could have been a factor in our study with relatively healthy 10‐year‐old children. The associations and mechanisms connecting obesity and visceral adiposity with RVEF and LVEF require further study.

In our study, childhood body composition was associated with small changes in cardiac structure. In adults, cardiac hypertrophy and concentric remodeling are associated with increased cardiovascular disease and mortality.33 It remains unclear how childhood cardiac structure relates to adult cardiac structure. However, previous research has suggested that childhood body size is associated with adult cardiac structure, independent of adult body size.2 Also, cardiac structure has been shown to track from childhood to adulthood.40 These findings suggest that body composition across the full spectrum in childhood is associated with cardiac adaptations and subsequently predispose an individual for later cardiovascular disease. More research is needed to disentangle the mechanisms linking childhood body composition with adult cardiac structure and cardiovascular disease. To disentangle physiologic from pathologic remodeling in childhood, there may be a role for other imaging techniques, such as 3‐dimensional imaging of the ventricles or strain imaging. Strain imaging could provide more information on cardiac function and hold prognostic information.41 Three‐dimensional imaging could give better insight into cardiac remodeling patterns.42 Because weight loss in adults can have beneficial effects on cardiac structure, the adverse changes in childhood cardiac structure and geometry could also be reversible.43 It is important to better understand the mechanisms behind the associations between obesity, body composition, and cardiac remodeling, and how this progresses from early life onward. This could eventually help to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in future generations.

Methodological Considerations

The main strengths of this study are its population‐based design and the large number of body composition measurements and cardiac imaging available. Using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry, MRI, and cMRI, we were able to study the associations of specific body composition measures on both the right and the left ventricle, but there some limitations. Not all children participating in our studies had successful cMRIs. Poor‐quality cardiac MRI scans were often caused by logistical or participant constraints. This could lead to bias if obesity is related to the success rate of cMRI. We did not observe any association of BMI with success rate of cMRI in our nonresponse analyses (results not shown). In our study, BMI and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry measurements were performed at a different timepoint than the MRI scans. However, the majority of children (65%) had the 2 visits within 2 months, when there was more time between the measurements, so the body composition at the time of the cMRI may have changed. We adjusted our analyses for the time difference, so this measurement error could have led to some attenuation of the effect estimates. In our population, 17.5% of the children were overweight or obese, as compared with 75.8% of the normal‐weight children. This relatively lower number could have favored associations within the normal‐weight category; however, we did not observe an interaction between our determinants and outcomes and the weight categories. Although we adjusted for some confounders, residual confounding may be of concern, as with any observational study. We did not have information on physical activity and fitness, or on diet, and thus these factors could have influenced the associations observed.

Conclusions

Higher childhood BMI is associated with both larger right and left ventricular sizes. Our findings suggest that these associations are mainly influenced by higher lean mass. In childhood, lean mass may be a stronger determinant of heart growth than fat mass.

Sources of Funding

The Generation R Study is made possible by financial support from the Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam; the Erasmus University Rotterdam; and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development. Research leading to these findings was supported by grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (VIDI 016.136.361), the European Research Council Consolidator (ERC‐2014‐CoG‐648916), and the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (733206 from LifeCycle and grant 633595 from DynaHEALTH). The study was also supported by grants from the Dutch Heart Foundation (2017T013 to R.G.), the Dutch Diabetes Foundation (2017.81.002), and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW, 543003109).

Disclosures

None.

Supporting information

Data S1 Figures S1–S3 Tables S1–S4 References 15 and 16

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the participating children and mothers, their families, general practitioners, hospitals, midwives, and pharmacies in Rotterdam. The Generation R Study is conducted by the Erasmus Medical Center in close collaboration with the School of Law and Faculty of Social Sciences of the Erasmus University Rotterdam; the Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area, Rotterdam; the Rotterdam Homecare Foundation, Rotterdam; and the Stichting Trombosedienst and Artsenlaboratorium Rijnmond, Rotterdam.

(J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e014933 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014933.)

For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 8.

References

  • 1. Prospective Studies C , Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, Clarke R, Emberson J, Halsey J, Qizilbash N, Collins R, Peto R. Body‐mass index and cause‐specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373:1083–1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lai CC, Sun D, Cen R, Wang J, Li S, Fernandez‐Alonso C, Chen W, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Impact of long‐term burden of excessive adiposity and elevated blood pressure from childhood on adulthood left ventricular remodeling patterns: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1580–1587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bluemke DA, Kronmal RA, Lima JA, Liu K, Olson J, Burke GL, Folsom AR. The relationship of left ventricular mass and geometry to incident cardiovascular events: the MESA (Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2148–2155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Alpert MA, Karthikeyan K, Abdullah O, Ghadban R. Obesity and cardiac remodeling in adults: mechanisms and clinical implications. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;61:114–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Neeland IJ, Poirier P, Després J‐P. Cardiovascular and metabolic heterogeneity of obesity: clinical challenges and implications for management. Circulation. 2018;137:1391–1406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Liu J, Fox CS, Hickson DA, May WD, Hairston KG, Carr JJ, Taylor HA. Impact of abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue on cardiometabolic risk factors: the Jackson Heart Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:5419–5426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bella JN, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, O'Grady MJ, Welty TK, Lee ET, Fabsitz RR, Howard BV. Relations of left ventricular mass to fat‐free and adipose body mass: the Strong Heart Study. The Strong Heart Study Investigators. Circulation. 1998;98:2538–2544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Neeland IJ, Gupta S, Ayers CR, Turer AT, Rame JE, Das SR, Berry JD, Khera A, McGuire DK, Vega GL, et al. Relation of regional fat distribution to left ventricular structure and function. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:800–807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gishti O, Gaillard R, Durmus B, Abrahamse M, van der Beek EM, Hofman A, Franco OH, de Jonge LL, Jaddoe VW. BMI, total and abdominal fat distribution, and cardiovascular risk factors in school‐age children. Pediatr Res. 2015;77:710–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kooijman MN, Kruithof CJ, van Duijn CM, Duijts L, Franco OH, van IJzendoorn MH, de Jongste JC, Klaver CC, van der Lugt A, Mackenbach JP, et al. The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2017. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31:1243–1264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lopez L, Colan SD, Frommelt PC, Ensing GJ, Kendall K, Younoszai AK, Lai WW, Geva T. Recommendations for quantification methods during the performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the Pediatric Measurements Writing Group of the American Society of Echocardiography Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Council. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:465–495; quiz 576‐467. 2010/05/11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Fredriks AM, van Buuren S, Burgmeijer RJ, Meulmeester JF, Beuker RJ, Brugman E, Roede MJ, Verloove‐Vanhorick SP, Wit JM. Continuing positive secular growth change in The Netherlands 1955–1997. Pediatr Res. 2000;47:316–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320:1240–1243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kaul S, Rothney MP, Peters DM, Wacker WK, Davis CE, Shapiro MD, Ergun DL. Dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry for quantification of visceral fat. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20:1313–1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wells JC, Cole TJ; Steam As . Adjustment of fat‐free mass and fat mass for height in children aged 8 y. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:947–952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Hu HH, Nayak KS, Goran MI. Assessment of abdominal adipose tissue and organ fat content by magnetic resonance imaging. Obes Rev. 2011;12:e504–e515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Toemen L, Gaillard R, Roest AA, van der Geest RJ, Steegers EA, van der Lugt A, Helbing WA, Jaddoe VW. Fetal and infant growth patterns and left and right ventricular measures in childhood assessed by cardiac MRI. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27:63–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Schulz‐Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, Flamm SD, Fogel MA, Friedrich MG, Kim RJ, von Knobelsdorff‐Brenkenhoff F, Kramer CM, Pennell DJ, et al. Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sesso HD, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, Glynn RJ. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and mean arterial pressure as predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in men. Hypertension. 2000;36:801–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Keijzer‐Veen MG, Euser AM, van Montfoort N, Dekker FW, Vandenbroucke JP, Van Houwelingen HC. A regression model with unexplained residuals was preferred in the analysis of the fetal origins of adult diseases hypothesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:1320–1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sterne JA, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, Wood AM, Carpenter JR. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Gaillard R, Steegers EA, Tiemeier H, Hofman A, Jaddoe VW. Placental vascular dysfunction, fetal and childhood growth, and cardiovascular development: the Generation R Study. Circulation. 2013;128:2202–2210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bello NA, Cheng S, Claggett B, Shah AM, Ndumele CE, Roca GQ, Santos AB, Gupta D, Vardeny O, Aguilar D, et al. Association of weight and body composition on cardiac structure and function in the ARIC Study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities). Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9:e002978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Turkbey EB, McClelland RL, Kronmal RA, Burke GL, Bild DE, Tracy RP, Arai AE, Lima JA, Bluemke DA. The impact of obesity on the left ventricle: the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:266–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Shah NR, Braverman ER. Measuring adiposity in patients: the utility of body mass index (BMI), percent body fat, and leptin. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Forbes GB, Welle SL. Lean body mass in obesity. Int J Obes. 1983;7:99–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Abbasi SA, Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Jerosch‐Herold M, Blankstein R, Petersen SE, Rider OJ, Lima JA, Allison MA, Murthy VL, et al. Visceral adiposity and left ventricular remodeling: the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;25:667–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. de Koning L, Merchant AT, Pogue J, Anand SS. Waist circumference and waist‐to‐hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular events: meta‐regression analysis of prospective studies. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:850–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Mangner N, Scheuermann K, Winzer E, Wagner I, Hoellriegel R, Sandri M, Zimmer M, Mende M, Linke A, Kiess W, et al. Childhood obesity: impact on cardiac geometry and function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:1198–1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Wilner B, Garg S, Ayers CR, Maroules CD, McColl R, Matulevicius SA, de Lemos JA, Drazner MH, Peshock R, Neeland IJ. Dynamic relation of changes in weight and indices of fat distribution with cardiac structure and function: the Dallas Heart Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005897 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Daniels SR, Kimball TR, Morrison JA, Khoury P, Witt S, Meyer RA. Effect of lean body mass, fat mass, blood pressure, and sexual maturation on left ventricular mass in children and adolescents. Statistical, biological, and clinical significance. Circulation. 1995;92:3249–3254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Alpert MA, Omran J, Bostick BP. Effects of obesity on cardiovascular hemodynamics, cardiac morphology, and ventricular function. Curr Obes Rep. 2016;5:424–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Tsao CW, Gona PN, Salton CJ, Chuang ML, Levy D, Manning WJ, O'Donnell CJ. Left ventricular structure and risk of cardiovascular events: a Framingham Heart Study Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e002188 DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ganau A, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, de Simone G, Pickering TG, Saba PS, Vargiu P, Simongini I, Laragh JH. Patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric remodeling in essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1550–1558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Woodiwiss AJ, Libhaber CD, Majane OH, Libhaber E, Maseko M, Norton GR. Obesity promotes left ventricular concentric rather than eccentric geometric remodeling and hypertrophy independent of blood pressure. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:1144–1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Jing L, Binkley CM, Suever JD, Umasankar N, Haggerty CM, Rich J, Wehner GJ, Hamlet SM, Powell DK, Radulescu A, et al. Cardiac remodeling and dysfunction in childhood obesity: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Shah RV, Abbasi SA, Heydari B, Rickers C, Jacobs DR Jr, Wang L, Kwong RY, Bluemke DA, Lima JA, Jerosch‐Herold M. Insulin resistance, subclinical left ventricular remodeling, and the obesity paradox: MESA (Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1698–1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Monte IP, Mangiafico S, Buccheri S, Arcidiacono AA, Lavanco V, Privitera F, Leggio S, Deste W, Tamburino C. Early changes of left ventricular geometry and deformational analysis in obese subjects without cardiovascular risk factors: a three‐dimensional and speckle tracking echocardiographic study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30:1037–1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Buechel EV, Kaiser T, Jackson C, Schmitz A, Kellenberger CJ. Normal right‐ and left ventricular volumes and myocardial mass in children measured by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009;11:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Urbina EM, Gidding SS, Bao W, Pickoff AS, Berdusis K, Berenson GS. Effect of body size, ponderosity, and blood pressure on left ventricular growth in children and young adults in the Bogalusa Heart Study. Circulation. 1995;91:2400–2406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Dandel M, Lehmkuhl H, Knosalla C, Suramelashvili N, Hetzer R. Strain and strain rate imaging by echocardiography—basic concepts and clinical applicability. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2009;5:133–148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Lewandowski AJ, Augustine D, Lamata P, Davis EF, Lazdam M, Francis J, McCormick K, Wilkinson AR, Singhal A, Lucas A, et al. Preterm heart in adult life: cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals distinct differences in left ventricular mass, geometry, and function. Circulation. 2013;127:197–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Shah RV, Murthy VL, Abbasi SA, Eng J, Wu C, Ouyang P, Kwong RY, Goldfine A, Bluemke DA, Lima J, et al. Weight loss and progressive left ventricular remodelling: the Multi‐Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22:1408–1418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data S1 Figures S1–S3 Tables S1–S4 References 15 and 16


Articles from Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES