In the original article, there was a mistake in the Supplementary Table named Table S3 AUCs, Sensitivity, Specificity of cox2, β-catenin and wnt3a in predicting diagnosis, myometrial invasion, vessel invasion, lymph node metastasis, and poor prognosis as published. The specificity of wnt3a in serum for myometrial invasion is 0.316 and the p value is 0.010. The corrected Supplementary Table S3 appears below.
Table S3.
AUCs, Sensitivity, Specificity of cox2, β-catenin and wnt3a in predicting diagnosis, myometrial invasion, vessel invasion, lymph node metastasis, and poor prognosis.
| Item | AUCs | Sensitivity | Specificity | 95% CI | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis | Cox2 expression | 0.931 | 0.918 | 0.812 | 0.882–0.981 | 0 |
| β-catenin expression | 0.933 | 0.902 | 0.750 | 0.886–0.980 | 0 | |
| Cox2 in serum | 0.887 | 0.951 | 0.719 | 0.805–0.968 | 0 | |
| Wnt3a in serum | 0.931 | 0.967 | 0.812 | 0.873–0.981 | 0 | |
| Myometrial invasion | Cox2 expression | 0.732 | 0.826 | 0.500 | 0.605–0.860 | 0.003 |
| β-catenin expression | 0.692 | 0.783 | 0.526 | 0.556–0.6827 | 0.013 | |
| Cox2 in serum | 0.590 | 0.913 | 0.237 | 0.437–0.744 | 0.240 | |
| Wnt3a in serum | 0.698 | 0.913 | 0.316 | 0.566–0.830 | 0.010 | |
| Vessel invasion | Cox2 expression | 0.702 | 0.739 | 0.632 | 0.567–0.837 | 0.009 |
| β-catenin expression | 0.763 | 0.783 | 0.526 | 0.619–0.906 | 0.001 | |
| Cox2 in serum | 0.696 | 0.739 | 0.632 | 0.558–0.834 | 0.011 | |
| Wnt3a in serum | 0.757 | 0.783 | 0.632 | 0.631–0.884 | 0.001 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | Cox2 expression | 0.692 | 0.800 | 0.549 | 0.537–0.847 | 0.056 |
| β-catenin expression | 0.693 | 0.700 | 0.686 | 0.522–0.864 | 0.055 | |
| Cox2 in serum | 0.732 | 0.800 | 0.627 | 0.596–0.869 | 0.021 | |
| Wnt3a in serum | 0.711 | 0.700 | 0.765 | 0.517–0.905 | 0.036 | |
| Prognosis | Cox2 expression | 0.789 | 0.850 | 0.659 | 0.676–0.902 | 0 |
| β-catenin expression | 0.869 | 0.850 | 0.854 | 0.767–0.971 | 0 | |
| Cox2 in serum | 0.752 | 0.800 | 0.732 | 0.623–0.881 | 0.002 | |
| Wnt3a in serum | 0.711 | 0.750 | 0.585 | 0.561–0.861 | 0.008 |
An author was incorrectly labeled as Haiyan Liang1, as she is the co-correspondence author. The correct label is Haiyan Liang1*.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
