Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0240678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240678

The magnitude of anemia and associated factors among adult diabetic patients in Tertiary Teaching Hospital, Northern Ethiopia, 2019, cross-sectional study

Nigus Alemu Hailu 1,*, Tesfaye Tolessa 2, Zenawi Hagos Gufue 3, Etsay Weldekidan Tsegay 4, Kidanemaryam Berhe Tekola 5
Editor: Paolo Magni6
PMCID: PMC7671748  PMID: 33170882

Abstract

Background

Patients with Diabetic Mellitus are at higher risk of different complications. Many previous studies show that anemia among diabetic patients is poorly diagnosed.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the magnitude and associated factors of anemia among adult diabetes patients having regular follow up at the diabetic clinic of Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Tigray, 2018/19.

Methods

This study was conducted the Diabetic clinic of Ayder comprehensive specialized hospital, Tigray regional state, Northern Ethiopia from January to March 2019. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants. About 5 ml of venous blood was collected by experienced laboratory technologists under a complete aseptic technique. Two ml of the venous blood was used for hemoglobin determination. And three ml of the venous blood was used without any anticoagulant for creatinine determination. The association of variables was assessed using bivariate and multivariable analysis in the logistic regression model with p-value, odds ratio, and 95% CI in the SPSS version 24 software.

Results

From a total of 262 diabetes patients, forty-seven (17.9%) were found to be anemic (6.7% males and 11.5% females). Among the related factors, residency (Adjusted Odds Ratio, 7.69, 95% CI, 2.060, 28.69, p = 0.002,), age of the patients (Adjusted Odds Ratio, 4.007, 95%CI, 1.53–10.51, p = 0.005,) and sex (Adjusted Odds Ratio, 3.434, 95% CI, 1.582, 7.458, p = 0.042,) were significantly associated with anemia.

Conclusion

According to this study, the magnitude of anemia is high among diabetic patients. Occupation of the participants, residency, HIV status, being female, and age was significantly associated with anemia.

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a heterogeneous metabolic disorder characterized by the presence of hyperglycemia due to impairment of insulin secretion, defective insulin action, or both, which requires continuous medical care with multifactorial risk-reduction strategies beyond glycemic control. The chronic hyperglycemia of patients with diabetes mellitus is associated with relatively specific long-term microvascular complications affecting the eyes, kidneys, and nerves, as well as an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease [1,2].

Anemia is one of the preventable complications of DM, but it is less focused and estimated by the diabetes care providers [3]. Globally, Iron deficiency is the most common cause of anemia but other nutritional deficiencies (including folate, vitamin B12, and vitamin A), acute inflammation, chronic inflammations, and inherited or acquired disorders can also cause anemia by reducing hemoglobin synthesis, red blood cell production, or red blood cell survival '[2].

Hemoglobin concentration alone cannot be sufficient to diagnose iron-deficiency anemia, but it can provide general information on the magnitude and severity of anemia [4]. The cutoff points to diagnose anemia is <12 g/dl and <13 g/dl of Hemoglobin for females and males respectively [2]. DM and anemia are closely associated and diabetic patients tend to develop anemia because of different factors, including free radicals, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and renal disease [5].

The prevalence and incidence of diabetes has been reported to vary among populations and among age groups of the same population. According to the International Diabetic Federation 2015 estimate, and WHO 2016 report, the worldwide prevalence of DM is 1 in 11 adults, and 422 million people were living with DM. There were also 5 million deaths related to it [6]. Diabetes among adults is increased from 4.7% in 1980 to 8.5% in 2014 [7]. From this, Africa accounts for 14.2 million diabetic cases and this is expected to rise to 34.2 million by the end of 2035 [6].

DM affects virtually every system of our body. Most of the complications develop from hyperglycemia which in turn, increases the generation of oxygen-derived free radicals. The free radicals will cause further vascular complications and damage [8]. Anemia is one of the common complications of diabetes mellitus. It is poorly diagnosed and neglected disorder among diabetic patients. This is due to poor screening of their hematologic conditions. This will expose diabetic patients to different unwanted complications and it will be difficult to treat at its advanced stage [9].

Globally, anemia affects more than 1.62 billion people (24.8% of the global population) and it is responsible for 8.8% of the total disabilities globally. South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa are among the highly burdened zones, while the westerns are least affected. Ethiopia is one of the highly affected Sub-Saharan countries by anemia [10]. Anemia is the second target of global nutrition for 2025 [9]. Anemia has a significant negative impact on the overall global and national development [11].

The precise magnitude of anemia among chronic disease patients is difficult to ascertain because many of the patients with DM and other chronic diseases are not screened and investigated sufficiently to establish the diagnosis of anemia [10]. Anemia among diabetic patients is an augmenting risk factor for further complications like cardiovascular diseases, and increased morbidity and mortality. Diabetic Patients who are anemic are prone to develop left ventricular hypertrophy which eventually leads to full-blown cardiovascular disease and chronic renal disease [12].

In Ethiopia, there are only a few researches done on the association of hematologic profiles and renal disease among diabetic patients. Additionally, in Ethiopia anemia screening among diabetes patients is not practiced during their follow-ups. Therefore, anemia can put diabetes patients at high risk of hospitalization and premature death. But there is an information gap on the exact magnitude of anemia among adult diabetic patients. The information is critical to ensure optimum delivery of comprehensive follow-up services.

Therefore, this study was aimed to assess the magnitude and associated factors of anemia among diabetes mellitus patients at Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in 2018/19. So, there is a need to conduct a research to realize feasible solutions and to inform clinicians on successful monitoring anemia status among diabetes patients and to prevent the possible complications at their early stage. Besides, this study will help clinicians, policymakers, and health planners in designing the best and appropriate early anemia screening and approaching strategies.

Materials and methods

Study design, period and area

Institutional based cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2019. The study was conducted at the diabetic clinic of Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Tigray Regional State, Northern Ethiopia, which is found 783 Kilometers North of Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia. It is a public teaching hospital and research center in Northern Ethiopia, rendering its referral and specialized medical services to more than 9 million populations in its catchment areas. It stands as the second-largest hospital in the nation with a total capacity of about 500 inpatient beds in all departments and other specialty units, with more than 170,000 patient flows per year [13].

Study participants

The study was conducted on 262 adult diabetic patients. The target population is all adult diabetes patients while the adult diabetic patients who visited the clinic during the study period and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were considered as the study population. All confirmed outpatient adult diabetes patients who had regular follow up at the diabetic clinic of Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital during the study period were included in the study. The diabetic patients were diagnosed based on the WHO 2006 criteria of DM diagnosis. Adult diabetic patients who had confirmed cancer cases or taking immunosuppressive medications causing anemia, pregnant mothers, admitted patients, critically ill patients and those who had known hearing problem that and then cannot able to give informed consent; those who were taking anthelminthic medication in the last three months were excluded from the study. The medications were checked from the patient’s chart.

Sample size and sampling technique

The sample size was determined using single population proportion formula using STAT CALC menu of Epi info version 7.2.2.6 software (center for diseases control and prevention, Atlanta, USA) with the assumptions of two-sided significance level (α = 5%), 95% confidence level, considering 19% prevalence of anemia among adult diabetes patients [14], and accordingly, the calculated sample size was 236. Adjustment for non-response rate was made by taking 10% and then the final sample size was 262. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants. There were a total of 2400 diabetic patients with a regular follow up during the study period. And using systematic random sampling, every 9th patient was selected.

Data collection and laboratory methods

A pre-tested structured interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics of patients and their associated risk factors, which have been developed after reviewing different kinds of literature and previous similar studies by the authors. The questionnaire was prepared first in English and then translated to the local language (Tigrigna) and then back to English to maintain its consistency. Data were collected by two experienced nurses at the diabetic clinic of Ayder comprehensive specialized hospital and one supervisor with masters in diabetes care, who was recruited from the same Hospital. The data collection period was from January to March 2019.

Anthropometric measurements like height and weight were measured using the nearest centimeter without shoes and to the nearest 0.1kg respectively. Body mass index was calculated by dividing the weight in Kg by the square of height in meter. Waist circumference was measured midway between the lowest rib and iliac crest. Blood Pressure was measured using the sphygmomanometer from the upper arm after a patient sat for at least 5 minutes by qualified personnel. The hand was at heart level to minimize the gravity effect during blood pressure measurement, and all the anthropometric and BP measurements were measured twice, and the average value was taken.

A total of 5 ml venous blood was collected by an experienced laboratory technologist under a complete aseptic technique and from this, 2 ml venous blood was put into a test tube coated with EDTA anticoagulant for hemoglobin determination. The collected whole blood was properly mixed and put into an SYSMEX CBC machine for hemoglobin and hematocrit determination. The performance of the hematology analyzer was controlled by running quality control material alongside the study participant’s sample. For creatinine determination, 3 ml of the venous blood was used by a test tube without any anticoagulant and the whole blood was allowed to clot for 20 minutes. The separated serum was put in to fully automated chemistry machine to determine creatinine.

Data quality assurances

To assure the quality of the data, a properly designed data collection tool was prepared before starting the actual data collection process and closed supervision was given by the principal investigator during data collection, collected data was reviewed by the principal investigator, any problem faced at the time of data collection was discussed and corrective measures were made immediately. In the laboratory aspect, quality assurance checks were performed daily according to the laboratory's protocol. Standard operating procedures were followed during specimen collection and processing. All reagents used were checked for their expiry date and prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Data processing and analysis

The data was entered into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 for windows (Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were presented as means and standard deviations, while categorical variables were presented in frequencies and percentages. Logistic regression was computed to assess the statistical association. Bivariate analysis was done to check the existence of crude association and to select candidate variables, those variables which were clinically important and those which had a P-value of < 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were selected to enter into the final model.

A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify the independent factors associated with anemia. The summary measures of estimated crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were presented and P-value <0.05 was used to declare statistical significance.

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the research and ethical committee of the Department of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University. The chief executive director of Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital and head of the diabetic clinic of the hospital were informed about the objective of the study and written permission was obtained before starting data collection. All participants were asked to provide written informed consent if they were able to write and for those who cannot write they were asked to use inked thumbprint on the consent form in the presence of an independent witness. Each respondent was informed about the objective of the study and they were assured of the confidentiality, risks, and benefits of the study procedures.

Dissemination of findings

This finding was defended at the Department of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, and submitted to the School of graduate studies of Addis Ababa University, principal advisor of the thesis, Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital medical director office, and other concerned bodies. The result is also to be disseminated through workshops, seminars, and published in an international, professional high impact journal.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants

A total of 262 adult diabetes patients were included in this study; from whom, 134 (51.1%) were males while 128 (48.9%) were females. The response rate was 100%. The minimum age of the participants was 18 years, while the maximum was 84. About two hundred (76.3%) of the participants were between the age of 18 and 60 years old (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of diabetes mellitus patients in Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2019.

Variable Category Frequency Percent (%)
Educational status Not educated 120 45.8
Primary school 37 14.1
Secondary school 36 13.7
Above secondary school 69 26.3
Total 262 100
Occupation Governmental 70 26.7
Farmer 67 25.6
Self-employed 125 47.7
Total 262 100
Ethnicity Tigray 260 99.2
Afar 2 0.8
Total 262 100
Income level High 35 13.4
Medium 170 64.9
Low 57 21.8
Total 262 100

Clinical profile of the participants

Almost all the participants, 232 (85.5%) had good adherence to their medication and 168 (64.1%) patients had metformin as their first-line medication, while 35.1% of them were taking insulin as a first-line medication. The average stay with diabetes mellitus from the first time of diagnosis was about 8.7 ±6.8 years. Twenty-seven (10.3%) participants had chronic eye disease and twenty-nine (11.1%) had arthritis. Ten (3.8%) patients had confirmed retroviral infection. Fourteen (5.3%) patients had an un-specified chronic disease that they could not rule out, other than the above-mentioned diseases. In this study, about 26% of type-2 DM patients had a BMI of greater than 25 Kg/m², while only 1.9% of type-1 DM patients had a BMI greater than 25 Kg/m².

Biochemical profiles of the participants

A waist circumference of the patients was measured to see the presence or absence of central obesity. Majority (88.1%) of males had a waist circumference of less than 102 cm, while16 (11.9%) males had waist circumference above 102 cm. One hundred one (78.1%) female participant had a waist circumference of less than 88 cm, while 28 (21.9%) of them had a waist circumference of above 88 cm.

Majority (80.5%) of the participants had systolic blood pressure between 90 and 140 mmHg. Fifty (19.1%) patients had systolic blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg. Similarly (83.2%) of the participants had diastolic blood pressure between 60 to 85 mmHg and 42 (16%) had diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 mmHg. One hundred twenty-six (52.9%) of the participants had a fasting blood glucose of greater than 160 mg/dl, while 109 (45.8%) had to fast blood glucose level between 70 and 160 mg/dl. A majority (65.3%) of the patients had a normal range of BMI (18.5 and 24.9 kg/m²), while seventy patients (27.7%) had a BMI of above 25 kg/m². Besides, 11 patients had a BMI of <18.5 kg/m².

The prevalence of anemia among patients with a normal range of BMI was about 17%. Underweight patients have a 35.3% prevalence of anemia. Of the total anemic patients, 12.8% were underweight. From the total participants, One hundred sixty-nine (77.1%) patients had creatinine levels between 0.5 and 1.2 mg/dL, while 93 (35.6%) had creatinine levels of above 1.2 mg/dL.

From the total 47 anemic cases in this study, nearly half of the patients (46.8%) had a Cr level of greater than 1.2 mg/dL. The distribution of anemia differs from the sex of the participant, where females have a higher prevalence of anemia. In addition, the prevalence of anemia is higher among DM patients with the renal disease compared to DM patients with normal renal function.

Bivariable analysis of anemia showed that age, sex, residency area, occupational status, type of diabetes mellitus, hypertension status, and HIV infection were found to be candidates for the next model, the multivariable logistic regression model. The significance level for bivariate analysis was considered less than 0.25. The variables which were a candidate in the bivariable analysis entered into multivariable logistic analysis for identifying the most independent predictors of anemia.

The multivariable logistic regression analysis derived from binary logistic regression analysis showed that the area of residency, occupational status, HIV status, sex, and age of participants was found to be statistically significant to associate with anemia among adult diabetes patients. Even though eGFR is not statistically significant, clinically it is an important predictor of anemia among DM patients. The multivariable analysis of the candidate variables is summarized as follows, (Table 2)

Table 2. Multivariable analysis of anemia in diabetes mellitus patients.
Variable Anemia P-VALUE AOR 95%CI AOR
No Yes lower Upper
Residency area 0.002*
Urban 175 29 1
Rural 40 18 0.002 7.7 2.06 28.67
Occupational status 0.047*
Governmental 55 15 1
Farmer 52 15 0.025 .19 0.046 .159
Private 108 17 0.99 .48 .205 1.12
HIV status 0.023*
Non-reactive 62 15 1
Reactive 6 4 0.039 4.9 1.08 22.3
Unknown 147 28 0.26 .64 .297 1.39
Hypertension status
Yes 84 14 0.199 0.54 0.215 1.377
No 131 33 1
Type of DM 0.095
Type 1 44 14 1
Type 2 171 33 0.095 0.496 0.218 1.128
Sex of participant 0.002*
Male 117 17 1
Female 98 30 0.042 3.43 1.58 7.46
Age of participant 0.014*
18–60 years 167 33 1
>60 years 48 14 0.005 4.007 1.53 10.51

Discussion

Several studies have shown an increased risk of anemia among diabetic patients [15]. In this study, the number of male and female participants was similar (51.1%) and (48.9%) respectively. The minimum age of the participant was 18 years, while the maximum was 84 years. This happened because the study is conducted exclusively in adult diabetic patients, and the minimum cut off point of age to consider as an adult is 18 years in this setting. Since the study was conducted in adult diabetes patients, type-2 DM patients were high in number than type-1DM patients. This is because type-2 diabetes mellitus is more common in the adult population than type-1 diabetes [7].

Out of the total participants in this study, 18% of the diabetes patients had anemia. This finding is similar to a previous study done in England, which showed a 16.1% prevalence of anemia among diabetes patients [16]. This is also consistent with a study conducted in China which showed a 22.8% prevalence of anemia among diabetes patients [17]. In diabetic mellitus patients, concurrent infections like HIV, hookworm, and TB are common causes of anemia [18]. In this study, about 3.8% of the patients had confirmed retroviral infection and those reactive patients had 1.7 times increased chance of to be anemic compared with non-reactive diabetic patients.

A study conducted in Australia [19] showed a 19% prevalence of anemia among diabetes patients. This is similar to our finding (18%). This similarity may be explained by the inclusion of similar characteristics of patients. But our result is slightly higher than another study in Australia, which showed a 14.3% prevalence of anemia among diabetic patients [20]. This difference is explained by the composition of our study subjects. In this study, the study subjects were both type-1 and type-2 diabetic mellitus patients while the mentioned study was conducted only in type-1 diabetic patients. The other possible reason for the higher result in this study is the inclusion of a higher number of diabetes patients with renal failure, while that study includes only small number of patients with renal failure.

The result of this study is slightly higher than from a study conducted in Israel, which reported that the prevalence of anemia among diabetic patients was 10.8%. Compared to this report, our result is higher. This may be due to the inclusion of diabetes patients with different degrees of renal impairment and small sample size, unlike that study which includes only diabetic patients with normal renal function and a large sample size [15]. Those diabetic patients with hypertension had 3 times increased risk of anemia as compared to the normotensive diabetic group. This is in line with a study conducted in Korea. This may be due to the effect of vascular complications and anti-hypertensive drugs [21].

Our result is also in agreement with a study conducted in Nigeria, with a general prevalence of 15.3% in diabetes patients. Our result also shows that the prevalence of anemia was high (29.2%) with an AOR of 4.007, among patients of advanced age (>60 years), compared to patients below 60 years with (19.8%) prevalence. This is consistent with a study conducted in Nigeria [22]. This was expected because age is associated with anemia irrespective of the disease status.

The current study's finding revealed that rural residents of diabetes patients have a higher chance (AOR, 7.687 p = 0.002 CI, 2.060, 28.689) of getting anemia as compared to urban residents. This can be explained by the better level of living standards and increased health care seeking behavior in the urban. Reactive HIV status also shows a significant association with anemia among diabetes patients, with (p = 0.039 AOR, 4.92, 95%CI, 1.09–22.29) compared to non-reactive diabetes patients. HIV infection can cause anemia as it is a chronic catabolic disease and some of the highly active anti-retroviral drugs may even worsen the state of anemia.

In contrast to our study, research conducted in Gondar, Ethiopia [23] reveals that hematologic indices, like Hct, Hb, and WBC are increasing in diabetes patients. The difference observed in our result might be due to the indirect effect of insulin resistance on RBC hematopoietic precursor cells [24]. However, our study is in agreement with another study conducted in Finote Selam Hospital [25], which reported that 19.2% of diabetes patients had anemia. This concordance can be explained by a similar geographical location and living standard among diabetic patients.

Our study showed that 34.7% of the participants have impaired renal function, with 22.5%, 12.2% of them having eGFR of between 60 and 90, and less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m² respectively. This result is in agreement with a study conducted in China which showed 36% of the patients had impaired renal function using eGFR [17]. Similarly, this result is in line with a study conducted in Gojam, Finote Selam Hospital, Ethiopia, which showed 28.9% renal impairment among diabetic patients [25].

Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibits the release of erythropoietin by the kidney. Then Erythropoietin-stimulated hematopoietic proliferation, in turn, will be reduced. The proliferation of erythroid progenitors is also directly inhibited by TNFα, interferon-γ (IFNγ), and IL-1β). They also augment the erythrophagocytosis process by reticuloendothelial macrophage [15]. Bone marrow response is directly related to the activation of macrophages and the release of inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-1, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF α), and interferon-gamma (INF γ) which act by inhibiting the proliferation of erythroid precursors and therefore inhibit erythropoiesis. Furthermore, the suppressive action of these cytokines on erythropoiesis-stimulating overcomes the action of EPO resulting in decreased bone marrow response to EPO and erythropoiesis [26].

Anemia in diabetes patients plays a pervasive role in the development of microvascular complications, including cardiovascular complications and vice versa [17]. Besides, anemia hurts the sense of wellness, decrease work productivity, affects the quality of life, increases morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay.

The strength of this study is this is the first research to assess the burden of anemia among diabetic patients in the stated catchment area, and it tried also to assess the associated factors of anemia among diabetic patients. The limitations, it would have been more conclusive if it used a comparison group and assessed the level of their blood glucose level using hemoglobin A1c, to see the past three month's blood glucose status of the patients. But there was no fund to buy all the necessary materials and Hb A1C machine.

Conclusion

In this study, the prevalence of anemia among adult diabetic mellitus patients is high. Therefore, anemia is a public health problem according to the finding of this research. However, it is not prioritized as one of the top problems among these patients in this study area before. The prevalence of anemia is higher among female diabetic mellitus patients in this study. In addition, old aged diabetic mellitus patients are at high risk of developing anemia compared to the young adult diabetic mellitus patients. Therefore, it is important to incorporate an anemia screening strategy in all Diabetic Mellitus patients during their regular follow-ups.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. English and Tigrigna version of the questionnaire and the data set in zipped form.

(ZIP)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mekelle University for their technical support to this study. We would also want to thank all the participants and data collectors. Finally, we would like to thank the staff of Mekelle University, diabetic clinic, and laboratory for their cooperation during this work.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The corresponding author gets fund from Addis Ababa University (internal organization) but the funder had no role in study design, data collection, analysis and decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee, Punthakee Z, Goldenberg R, Katz P. Definition, Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes, Prediabetes and Metabolic Syndrome. Can J Diabetes. 2018. April;42 Suppl 1: S10–5. 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stoltzfus RJ, Dreyfuss ML. Guidelines for the use of iron supplements to prevent and treat iron deficiency anemia. Washington, DC: ILSI Pr; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Adejumo BI., Dimkpa U., Ewenighi CO., Onifade AA., Mokogwu AT., Erhabor TA. et al. Incidence and risk of anemia in type-2 diabetic patients in the absence of renal impairment. Health (NY). 2012. April 10;4(6):304–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.world health organization. Haemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anaemia and assessment of severity [Internet]. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Antwi-Bafour S., Hammond1 S., Adjei JK., Kyeremeh R., Martin-Odoom A., Ekem I. A case–control study of prevalence of anemia among patients with type 2 diabetes. J Med Case Reports. 2016;10(1):110–8. 10.1186/s13256-016-0889-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chan M. Global Report on Diabetes Mellitus [Internet]. 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2019 Jun 5] p. 1–88. Available from: (http://www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/index.html)
  • 7.Ohta M, Babazono T, Uchigata Y, Iwamoto Y. Comparison of the prevalence of chronic kidney disease in Japanese patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2010;27(1):1017–1023. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03049.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alemu F. Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus Disease and its Association with Level of Education Among Adult Patients Attending at Dilla Referral Hospital, Ethiopia. J Diabetes Metab. 2015;6(4):1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Roglic G, World Health Organization, editors. Global report on diabetes. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016. 86 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zarychanski R, Houston DS. Anemia of chronic disease: A harmful disorder or an adaptive, beneficial response? CMAJ Can Med Assoc J. 2008. August 12;179(4):333–7. 10.1503/cmaj.071131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Durrani AM. Prevalence of Anemia in Adolescents: A Challenge to the Global Health. Acta Sci Nutr Health. 2018. March 23;2(4). [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ritz E. Managing anaemia and diabetes: a future challenge for nephrologists. Nephrol Dialisis Transplant. 2005;vi21–vi25. 10.1093/ndt/gfh1093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mekelle University. Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Aug 11]. Available from: http://www.mu.edu.et/chs/index.php/ayder-referral-hospital
  • 14.Aljohani AH, Alrubyyi MA, Alharbi AB, Alomair AM, Alomair AA, Aldossari NA, et al. The Relation Between Diabetes Type II and Anemia. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2017. November 29;70(4):526–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grossman C., Dovrish Z, Koren-Morag N., Bornstein G, Leibowitz A. Diabetes mellitus with normal renal function is associated with anaemia. 2014;30(1):291–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Craig K, Williams J, Riley S, Smith H, Owens D, Worthing D. Anemia and Diabetes in the Absence of Nephropathy. Diabetes Care. 28(1):1118–1123. 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen CX, Li YC, Chan SL, Chan KH. Anemia and type 2 diabetes: implications from a retrospectively studied primary care case series. Hong Kong Med J. 2013. June;19(3):14–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bafour A. A case–control study of prevalence of anemia among patients with type 2 diabetes. J Med Case Reports. 2016;10(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thomas MC, Tsalamandris C, MacIsaac R, Jerums G. Functional erythropoietin deficiency in patients with Type 2 diabetes and anaemia. Diabet Med. 2006;23(5):502–9. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01829.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Thomas MC, MacIsaac RJ, Tsalamandris C, Molyneaux L, Goubina I, Fulcher G, et al. Anemia in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004. September 1;89(9):4359–63. 10.1210/jc.2004-0678 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yoon Hyun., Lee Jun Ho., Kim Gwang Seok., Kim Yu Jeong., Hwang Eun Young., Park Chang Eun.et al. The relationship between anemia and pulse pressure and hypertension: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2012. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2018;23(07):1–7. 10.1080/10641963.2017.1416123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Adejumo BI, Dimkpa U, Ewenighi CO, Onifade AA, Mokogwu AT, Erhabor TA. et al. Incidence and risk of anemia in type-2 diabetic patients in the absence of renal impairment. Health (N Y). 2012. April 10;4(6):304–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Biadgo B, Melku M, Abebe SM, Abebe M. Hematological indices and their correlation with fasting blood glucose level and anthropometric measurements in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Targets Ther. 2016. March 17;91–100. 10.2147/DMSO.S97563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ellinger V., Carlini L., Moreira R., Meirelles R. Relation Between Insulin Resistance and Hematological Parameters in a Brazilian Sample. Inst Estadual Diabetes E Endocrinol. 2006;50(1):114–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Abate A. Association of anemia and renal function test among diabetes mellitus patients attending Finote Selam Hospital, West Gojam, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. Biomed Cent Hematol. 2013;16(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Barbieri J, Fontela PC, Winkelmann ER, Zimmermann CEP, Sandri YP, Mallet EKV, et al. Anemia in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Anemia. 2015;2015(1):1–8. 10.1155/2015/354737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Paolo Magni

22 Apr 2020

PONE-D-20-02501

Magnitude of Anemia and Associated Factors among Adult Diabetes Patients in Tertiary Teaching Hospital, Northern Ethiopia, Cross Sectional Study

PLOS ONE

Dear Mr. Hailu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jun 06 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Paolo Magni

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The paper needs a very extensive revision.

The STROBE checklist needs to be doublechecked by the Authors.

Limitations of the study needs to be addressed in the Discussion and, concisely, in the Abstract.

All Reviewers' comments need to be addressed in full.

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements:

1.    Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.plosone.org/attachments/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include additional information regarding the survey or questionnaire used in the study and ensure that you have provided sufficient details that others could replicate the analyses. For instance, if you developed a questionnaire as part of this study and it is not under a copyright more restrictive than CC-BY, please include a copy, in both the original language and English, as Supporting Information.

3. In the Discussion section, please discuss any potential limitations of your study.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"We are grateful to Addis Ababa University and Adigrat University for funding this study. We would also want to thank all the participants and data collectors. Finally, we would like to thank the staff of Mekelle University, diabetic clinic and laboratory staff for their cooperation during the work."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."

5. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 2-3 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

6. Please upload a copy of Figure 5-6, to which you refer in your text on page 8-9. If the figure is no longer to be included as part of the submission please remove all reference to it within the text.

7. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 3 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Title: Magnitude of Anemia and Associated Factors among Adult Diabetes Patients in

Tertiary Teaching Hospital, Northern Ethiopia, Cross Sectional Study

Reviewer General Comments: The authors work may have significant contributions to understand the level of anemia cases among DM patients in Ethiopia set-up. Given the limited existence of similar researches in Ethiopia, this research outcome will have importance for devising or revising health policy in the country, specifically in Ayder Hospital. Considering the strong experimental design and the aforementioned reasons, I recommend the paper to be consider for publication after a minor revision.

On the other hand, the study could have been more strong were the authors recruited a control group (non-DM subjects).

Specific comments:

1. The authors declare that they don’t have specific funding source. However, they claim in the acknowledgement section that they have funding source from Addis Ababa University and Adigrat. This conflict of depiction need to be resolved.

2. Abstract: The authors ascertained that “anemia is higher in diabetes patients attending Ayder

Comprehensive Specialized Hospital” before the study conducted which is a wrong premise. How the author explain their claim about the existence of a high incidence of anemia among DM patients before the study conducted Vs the need to conduct the study to determine the magnitude?

In general, in the abstract part the problem statement and justification should be provided unambiguously.

3. In the discussion part, the authors should support “free radicals formation due to DM” with reference(s).

Reviewer #2: 1. General comment:

- The problem the researchers tried to address is very relevant and investigation could help to give emphasis by program managers and cliniciians.

- There are a number of editorial and English grammar issues in the document

2. Abstract

- Under background section: The authors stated that anemia is higher in diabetes patients ... and its magnitude is less emphasized. This can't be relevant reason to investigate this problem. If the magnitude is known and higher as stated by the authors, what is needed just intervention not research

- The objective is presented in the abstract and not shown in the introduction. Even here the formulated objective for magnitude but the title and result the authors presented include risk factors for anemia. Therefore, either the objective should be revised or the title and result should be revised

- Under result part of abstract the presented AOR for some of the variable is very wide. Does the author understand the meaning of wide CI and take care while concluding this study?

- Under conclusion section: It is stated that "... anemia is higher"; higher than which group?

- It is also stated "...Human Immune Deficiency Virus infection... . as associted with anemia." Bu not indicated in the result section

2. Background:

- The aim of the study was not shown

3. MATERIALS AND METHODS:

3.1 Study design, period and area

- The number of DM patients and care given for the patients must be outlined so that the reader can easily understand the sampling technique, and so on

3.2 Study participants

- How did the researcher assessed whether the medication is anti-helminthic or not?

3.3 Sample size and sampling technique

2020 10:24:18 PM

- Please show the interval and sampling procedure

3.4 Data collection and laboratory methods

- Please describe when and where the data was collected from the patients

- In page four paragraph two, it is presented that "And all the anthropometric and BP measurements were measured twice." Then which one was used in the analysis?

3.5 Data processing and Analysis

- What is the outcome and independent variables. The authors are expected to describe why they used logistic regression, model fitness check?....

4 Result:

4.1 socio-demographic characteristics:

In Table 1: How did you measure income? What is high, medium or low mean?? How did the author categorize it?

4.2 Very long and less informative table. Example: Table 2: Bivariate analysis of variables for anemia among diabetes mellitus patients in ACSH, 2018/19, (n=262);

- What type of regression model is it? Linear or logistic? The text in the table lack inconsistency font size...

-The author is has no objective or missed the aim. The title of the table says anemia but what is presented seems mean Hb.

- I don't see the advantage of this table. If needed the crude and adjusted result can be presented using one table

4.3 Table 3: Multivariable analysis of variables for Anemia in Diabetes patients

- Summary of the regression model should be presented

- I have serious reservation on the way model is fitted and what is presented here. The way OR is calculated is incorrect, please check.

- What is the importance of P-value here?

- very wide CI?? What does this show?

- The way OR is calculated is incorrect, please check. Even the 95% CI is much wider than what you presented here

- The way OR is calculated is incorrect, please check. Look at your discussion please

5. Discussion

There is major issues on the way the findings are discussed:

- The author compared two different non-comparable setting. Ex prevalence anemia in Ethiopia versus England. Look at paragraph 3

- Statistically non-significant variables were discussed as if they were. Example look at the following paragraph:"type-2 diabetic patients

have 1.7 times (AOR,

1.67, 95%CI, 0.81-3.3, P=0.17) high chance of anemia than type-1 diabetic patients"

- The justifications given are not consistent with the finding. Example "In DM, concurrent infections like

HIV, hookworm and TB are common causes of anemia "

- Or some of the justifications that were literature based were not cited. Look at paragraph 3. Ex "In this study prevalence of anemia was

found to be higher in females (11.5% vs. 6.4%), and this is due to the biological factors like menstrual loses in those who

were in their reproductive age. In addition the higher levels of androgen in males may contribute to the lower prevalence

of anemia among males."

- In general the discussion part must be revised using sound English language and should be well organized, using good scientific justification

- It should be in line with objective and result.- The OR presented is incorrect in most of the cases

- the author is expected to present the strength and limitation of the study

6 Conclusion

- Must made revised in line with update of document

7. Reference:

Please follow the guideline and correct the referencing

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dagnachew Eyachew Amare

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer comment-plos one.docx

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0240678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240678.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


12 Aug 2020

Response to Reviewers

Reviewers comment response

1. The authors declare that they don’t have specific funding source. However, they claim in the acknowledgement section that they have funding source from Addis Ababa University and Adigrat. This conflict of depiction need to be resolved.

We have changed that the funding was from Addis Ababa University (internal organization) and we corrected the cover letter also according this. But the funder had no role in study design, data collection, analysis and decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

2. Abstract: The authors ascertained that “anemia is higher in diabetes patients attending Ayder

Comprehensive Specialized Hospital” before the study conducted which is a wrong premise. How the author explains their claim about the existence of a high incidence of anemia among DM patients before the study conducted Vs the need to conduct the study to determine the magnitude?

In general, in the abstract part the problem statement and justification should be provided unambiguously.

I accept the comments and corrected accordingly.

1. In the discussion part, the authors should support “free radicals formation due to DM” with reference(s).

Here, reference number 32 is used to serve for that whole paragraph and to make it clear and specific I add that reference for that sentence specifically.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Paolo Magni

9 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-02501R1

The magnitude of Anemia and Associated Factors among Adult Diabetes Patients in Tertiary Teaching Hospital, Northern Ethiopia, 2019, cross-sectional study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hailu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please address the comments below.

The text requires to be extensively revised by an English mother tongue expert.

 

TITLE

In the title, correct to …adult diabetic patients….

 

ABSTRACT

Background

Correct to…Patients with diabetes mellitus…

 

The sentence …and the current study revealed that the magnitude of anemia among diabetes patients is high…. is not appropriate here as it reports the final results.

 

Conclusion

Correct to “HIV status”

 

TEXT

 

Methods

State which are the Criteria for diabetes diagnosis (WHO?, other?, which year?).

Please submit your revised manuscript by September 30, 2020. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Paolo Magni

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The text requires to be extensively revised by an English mother tongue expert.

TITLE

In the title, correct to …adult diabetic patients….

ABSTRACT

Background

Correct to…Patients with diabetes mellitus…

The sentence …and the current study revealed that the magnitude of anemia among diabetes patients is high…. is not appropriate here as it reports the final results.

Conclusion

Correct to “HIV status”

TEXT

Methods

State which are the Criteria for diabetes diagnosis (WHO?, other?, which year?).

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 2

Paolo Magni

1 Oct 2020

The magnitude of Anemia and Associated Factors among Adult Diabetic Patients in Tertiary Teaching Hospital, Northern Ethiopia, 2019, cross-sectional study.

PONE-D-20-02501R2

Dear Dr. Hailu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Paolo Magni

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

All questions have been addressed.

Some further polishing of the English language is recommended.

Acceptance letter

Paolo Magni

19 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-02501R2

The magnitude of Anemia and Associated Factors among Adult Diabetic Patients in Tertiary Teaching Hospital, Northern Ethiopia, 2019, cross-sectional study

Dear Dr. Hailu:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Paolo Magni

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix. English and Tigrigna version of the questionnaire and the data set in zipped form.

    (ZIP)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer comment-plos one.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 00Response to Reviewers8.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES