Abstract
Single-crystalline MoSe2 and MoTe2 platelets were grown by Chemical Vapor Transport (CVT), followed by exfoliation, device fabrication, optical and electrical characterization. We observed that for the field-effect-transistor (FET) channel thickness in range of 5.5 nm to 8.5 nm, MoTe2 shows p-type, whereas MoSe2 with channel thickness range of 1.6 nm to 10.5 nm, shows n-type conductivity behavior. At room temperature, both MoSe2 and MoTe2 FETs have high ON/OFF current ratio and low contact resistance. Controlling charge carrier type and mobility in MoSe2 and MoTe2 layers can pave a way for utilizing these materials for heterojunction nanoelctronic devices with superior performance.
Keywords: MoSe2, MoTe2, Chemical Vapor Transport, Phase Transition, X-ray Diffraction, Raman
I. Introduction
Molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2) and molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2) belong to a vast family of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), which have attracted a great interest due to the potential benefits for variety of device applications. These layered materials have a common formula MX2, where M is a transition metal from group IV-VII (Mo, W, Nb, etc.) and X is a chalcogen (S, Se or Te). One layer of MX2 consists of a ‘three-layer” structure with hexagonally packed sheet of M atoms sandwiched between two sheets of X atoms. Weak van der Waals bonding between the layers enables thinning of TMDs crystals down to a single layer by mechanical or chemical exfoliation.
Electronic properties of TMDs depend on crystal structure, composition and the number of layers. For example, bulk MoSe2 has an indirect bandgap of 0.85 eV while monolayer has a direct bandgap of 1.57 eV [1]. Similarly, bulk 2H-MoTe2 is an indirect-gap semiconductor with a bandgap of 0.81 eV and a monolayer MoTe2 exhibits a direct gap of 1.13 eV [2–3]. Due to its band-gap similar to Si (~1.1 eV) and a reversible metal-semiconductor phase transition, 2H-MoTe2 is a promising candidate for advanced electronic applications, including flexible and transparent electronics [4].
Here, we fabricated the field-effect transistors (FET) to study the semiconducting properties of the exfoliated MoTe2 and MoSe2 ultra-thin layers. The MoTe2 FETs with channel thickness in range of 5.5 nm to 8.5 nm showed p-type conductivity, whereas MoSe2 FETs, with channel thickness less in range of 1.6 nm to 10.5 nm, showed n-type behavior. Additional annealing of the devices at 350 °C in vacuum for 3 min improved their performance, in particular the field-effect mobility.
II. Experimental
A. Crystal Growth:
MoSe2 and MoTe2 single crystals were grown by chemical vapor transport (CVT) using SeBr4 and I2 transport agents, respectively. The quartz ampoules with a pre-synthesized polycrystalline MoSe2 and MoTe2 powders were placed in a horizontal tube furnace with a temperature gradient so that the charge was kept at 1000 °C and temperature at the opposite end of the ampoule was at about 940 °C. Slow cooling (20 °C /h) of the ampoules was implemented after 7 days of growth to obtain single crystals of MoSe2 and MoTe2 as shown in fig.1 (a,b).
Figure 1.

(a) MoTe2 crystals growing inside a quartz ampoule. (b) Representative pictures of individual MoTe2 crystals
B. Exfoliation method:
MoTe2 and MoSe2 layers were mechanically exfoliated onto SiO2/Si substrate. Prior to exfoliation, substrate was ultrasonically cleaned in acetone, 2-propanol and deionized (DI) water followed by oxygen plasma cleaning to remove the surface adsorbates [5]. MoTe2 layers were exfoliated using standard Scotch tape technique, while MoSe2 layers were exfoliated with a gold assisted method, adopted from [6]. The latter approach resulted in large-area (up to 150 μm in diameter), uniform few- to mono-layer thick MoSe2 layers as confirmed by AFM. To determine crystal structure of both materials, Raman spectra were collected on exfoliated layers at room temperature using a 532 nm laser with a ~1 μm spot size and 0.3 mW power.
C. Device Fabrication:
For FET design and fabrication, the p++ Si substrate was utilized as a back-gate electrode, with the 300 nm thick SiO2 layer acting as a gate dielectric. After exfoliation, optical lithography was conducted to create pattern of source/drain contacts for electrical measurements. Bi-layer Ti (15 nm)/ Au (150 nm) metal contacts were deposited using electron-beam evaporation followed by the lift-off process. Finally, the TMD channel was etched with RIE to obtain accurate channel length and width. Fig. 2 shows the optical image of a fabricated MoSe2 device. Electrically conducting silver paste was applied to the Si side of the wafer for back-gated FET measurements.
Figure 2.

(a) Optical image of MoSe2 fabricated device. (b) Etched channel of the material.
III. Results and Discussion
A. Raman Spectroscopy:
Raman spectroscopy is a non-destructive technique to analyze the crystal orientation. The lattice vibrational modes of MoTe2 and MoSe2 flakes were identified using Raman spectroscopy with laser of 532nm wavelength. Fig. 3a presents Raman spectra for MoTe2 with the E12g mode at 240 cm−1 and the B12g mode at about 290 cm−1, in agreement with other reports [2, 7]. The spectra for the MoSe2 flakes, Fig. 3b, exhibit an out-of-plane A1g mode around 242 cm−1, and an in-plane E2g mode at 289 cm−1. All lines are in excellent agreement with Raman studies on hexagonal MoTe2 reported in the literature [7–10], which confirms the phase and quality of the flakes.
Figure 3.

Raman spectra of (a) MoTe2 and (b) MoSe2 flakes, exfoliated onto SiO2/Si substrates.
D. Electrical Measurements:
Fig.4 shows schematic circuit measurement setup used to study the field-effect behavior of the devices. The current-voltage (Ids-Vds) characteristics of 5.6 nm thick MoTe2 and 2.4 nm thick MoSe2 devices at Vg = 0 V are shown in fig. 5(a) and fig. 5(b), respectively. After annealing the devices at 350 °C in vacuum for 3 min, the device performance improved as can be seen from the current-voltage characteristics in fig. 5.
Figure 4.

Schematic view of back-gated MoTe2 FET.
Figure 5.

Ids-Vds curves of (a) MoTe2 FETs with channel thickness 5.6 nm at Vgs= 0V. (b) MoSe2 FETs with channel thickness 2.4 nm at Vgs = 0V, before and after thermal annealing.
The corresponding transfer characteristics of MoTe2 and MoSe2 FET devices are shown in fig. 6(a) and fig. 6(b), respectively. The gate leakage currents (Igs) of the measured devices were negligible in a range of few picoamperes (pA).
Figure 6.

Transfer characteristics of back-gated (a) MoTe2 (b) MoSe2 of varying channel thickness FETs. The drain voltage (Vds) was set to 2V and source was grounded.
A p-type channel conductivity is observed in MoTe2 FET device as Vbg is varied from −60 V to 60 V as shown in fig.6 (a). MoTe2 FET shows p-type conducting behavior with varying back-gate voltage (Vbg) which is also seen in earlier literatures [11]. On the other hand, thin channel MoSe2 FET shows n-type transport behavior at varying gate voltage as shown in fig.6 (b) in agreement with early reports. [12] The ON/OFF current ratio is greater than 106 for MoSe2 transistors at Vds = 2 V, which matches most of the other 2D materials such as MoS2 and WSe2 [13, 14].
Field-effect mobility (μFE) of the devices is calculated using the following formula:
| (1) |
where L/W is the channel length-to-width ratio, Cox = (ε0 εr) /d is capacitance per unit area (F/cm2) of SiO2 dielectric (where, ε0 is the permittivity in vacuum, εr is 3.9 for SiO2, and d is the thickness of SiO2 which is 300 nm for devices used in this study). The calculated field-effect mobility from equation (1) is shown in fig.8 for MoTe2 and MoSe2 devices. Lower mobility value implies larger contact resistance and/or the presence of midgap trap states [13] in the TMD channel. At lower channel thickness, a significant increase in μFE is observed. This behavior of mobility, can be attributed to the presence of charge impurities at the interface [14].
Figure 8:

Mobility (cm2/V-s) versus channel thickness of (a) MoTe2 and (b) MoSe2 TFTs.
It was recently suggested that increase in mobility with thickness can be related to the reduced scattering of carriers by the Coulomb interaction [15]. Field-effect mobility saturates in MoTe2, which may be due to finite thickness channel conduction near the gate dielectric/MoTe2 junction [16]. As for the mobility decrease in thick channel, the interlayer coupling effect forms an inactive layer between metal contact and active layer. The stack of layers acting as series resistors and thus increases the contact resistance. [17] From fig. 8, it is observed that highest mobility obtained is ~ 0.9 cm2/ V·s and ~ 110 cm2/ V·s for MoTe2 and MoSe2 devices, respectively. Higher mobility of MoSe2 compared to MoTe2 transistors implies lower contact resistance in the MoSe2 case.
IV. conclusions
In conclusion, we reported the electrical characteristics of MoSe2 and MoTe2 FETs. The fabricated MoTe2 devices showed p-type conductivity for layer thickness less than 10 nm whereas, MoSe2 transistors showed n-type transfer behavior for thin 1.6nm – 10.5nm flakes. At room temperature, MoSe2 has very high ON/OFF current (~106) compared to MoTe2 transistors indicating very low contact resistance. From the study of both MoSe2 and MoTe2, different 2D materials can exhibit both n- and p-type behavior, which can pave way to utilize these materials for next generation MoTe2 and MoSe2 based nanoelectronic devices with improved performance.
Figure 7.

Output characteristics of the (a) MoTe2 TFT for channel thickness 5.6nm showing p-type conductivity. (b) MoSe2 TFT for channel thickness 2.4nm showing n-type conductivity.
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) of National Institute of Health (NIH) under award number U01EB021985. S.K. acknowledges support from the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology under financial assistance award 70NANB16H043.
V. references
- [1].Kioseoglou et al. , “Optical polarization and intervalley scattering in single layers of MoS2 and MoSe2”, Scientific Reports, 6: 25041, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Ruppert C, Aslan OB, and Heinz TF, “Optical properties and band gap of single-and few-layer MoTe2 crystals”, Nano Lett, vol. 14, pp. 6231–6236, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Keum DH et al. , “Bandgap opening in few-layered monoclinic MoTe2”, Nature Phys, vol. 11, pp. 482–487, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- [4].Duerloo K-AN, Li Yao, and Reed EJ, “Structural phase transitions in two-dimensional Mo- and W-dichalcogenide monolayers” Nature Commun, vol. 5, pp. 4214, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Huang Y, et al. “Reliable Exfoliation of Large-Area High-Quality Flakes of Graphene and Other Two-Dimensional Materials”, ACS Nano 9(11), 10612–201620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Desai Sujay B. et al. “Gold-Mediated Exfoliation of Ultralarge Optoelectronically-Perfect Monolayers”, Adv. Mater 28, 4053–4058, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Yamamoto M et al. “Strong enhancement of Raman scattering from a bulk-inactive vibrational mode in few-layer MoTe2”, ACS Nano, vol. 8, pp 3895–3903, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Nam D, Lee JU, and Cheong H, Excitation energy dependent Raman spectrum of MoSe2. Sci Rep, 2015. 5: p. 17113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].29. Arora A, et al. , Exciton band structure in layered MoSe2: from a monolayer to the bulk limit. Nanoscale, 2015. 7(48): p. 20769–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Stacy AM, Hodul DT, “Raman-Spectra of Ivb and Vib Transistion-Metal Disulfides Using Laser Energies near the Absorption Edges” J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1985, 46, 405–409. [Google Scholar]
- [11].Conan A, Bonnet A, Amrouche A, Siesser M,” Semiconducting properties and band structure of MoTe2 single crystals”. Journal de Physique, 45 (3), pp. 459–465, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- [12].Larentis S, Fallahazad B, and Tutuc E, Field-effect transistors and intrinsic mobility in ultra-thin MoSe2 layer, Appl. Phys. Lett 101 223104, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- [13].Radisavleivic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Griacometti V and Kis A, “Single-layer MoS2 transistors”, Nature Nanotechnology 6, 147–150, 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Fang Hui et al. “High-performance single layered WSe2 p-TFTs with Chemically Doped Contacts.” Nano. Lett 12(7), pp 3788–3792, 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Li SL, et al. , Thickness-dependent interfacial Coulomb scattering in atomically thin field-effect transistors. Nano Lett, 2013. 13(8): p. 3546–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Ji Hunjin et al. “Thickness-dependent carrier mobility of ambipolar MoTe2: Interplay between interface trap and Coulomb scattering “, App. Phy. Lett 110, 183501(2017). [Google Scholar]
- [17].Das S and Appenzeller J, Screening and interlayer coupling in multilayer MoS2. physica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters, 2013. 7(4): p. 268–27. [Google Scholar]
